No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Meadowbrook Manor - Lagrange

339 9th Avenue, La Grange, IL 60525 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 197 certified beds · (708) 354-4660 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$57,714 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $57,714 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-13)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
507 S La Grange Rd · (708) 354-9599 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2 N La Grange Rd · (708) 352-3116 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Olivaceto0.4 mi
77 S La Grange Rd · (708) 639-4408 · Call to confirm hours
Park
536 East Ave · (708) 588-2280 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.8%13.4%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.8%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms83.8%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.0%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.4%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.8%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.1%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.5%21.7%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.4%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.1%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.3%13.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.452.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.582.221.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 689 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
31.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.47U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 31.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 210 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.5%CMS range 55.8–63.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 8.8–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge31.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.8%CMS range 6.7–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.211.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.89
RN hours/ resident / day
0.78
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.05
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.68
RN hoursweekends
46.8%
Total nursing turnover
51.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 197 beds and averages 151.6 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-06)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident identified with confusion, poor safety awareness, ambulatory, and had verbalization of wanting to exit the facility, was provided supervision to prevent elopement from the facility. The facility also failed to ensure the door on the ground floor leads to courtyard and main street was in good repair and had a working alarm system to alert facility staff of a resident attempting to exit the facility. This failure resulted in R1 eloping from the facility without being witnessed by facility staff during the early hours on December 29, 2024. This applies to 1 of 7 residents (R1) reviewed for risk of elopement in the sample of 7. R1 was found standing on the sidewalk of a local street near an intersection with 4 traffic lanes, which was approximately 183 feet from the entrance of the facility by a bystander, who alerted the police on December 29, 2024, at 5:14AM. The local police and fire department found R1 wet, with no shoes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who developed facility-acquired pressure ulcers were assessed by the wound care physician/NP-Nurse Practitioner; failed to ensure the residents received nutritional interventions to promote wound healing; failed to put interventions in place to prevent pressure ulcers from deteriorating; failed to provide wound care treatments as ordered by the physician; and failed to follow their policy to do a root cause analysis for residents with facility-acquired pressure ulcers. This failures resulted in R1's facility-acquired pressure ulcer increasing in size, and R1's DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) progressing to an unstageable pressure ulcer. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for facility-acquired pressure ulcers in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including nondisplaced fracture of the right great…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer a resident while using a mechanical lift. As a result of this failure, R1 sustained a laceration to the head and fracture of the thoracic 8 and 12 vertebral bodies after falling. R1 was transferred to the local hospital and received 2 staples to the back of R1's head. This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R1 and R7) reviewed for falls and accidents. The findings include: On 10/22/24 at 11:15 AM, R1 was observed in bed in her room. R1 said fall incident happened on a Thursday, which was her shower day. R1 said 2 Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) transferred her using the mechanical lift from the bed to the shower chair and gave her a shower. R1 has a shower in her room. R1 said after the shower, the same CNAs were transferring her back to the bed using the mechanical lift. R1 said while they were attempting to put her back in bed, she fell to the floor on the bathroom side of her bed. R1 said she hit her head and there was some bleeding, and the staff called the ambulance, and she was sent to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the plan of care regarding the required number of staff assistance during bed mobility of a resident. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining an acute closed displaced supracondylar fracture of the distal end of the right femur after R1 fell off the bed during care on 11/4/2023. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of 3. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 as an [AGE] year-old resident, with diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, idiopathic gout, quadriplegia, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right knee, vitamin D deficiency, vitamin B12 deficiency, anemia, polyneuropathy, anxiety disorder, major depression, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, and osteoarthritis. The EMR also showed R1 had a history of right knee arthroplasty. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) 7/21/2023 showed R1 as cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient unlicensed nursing staff to meet resident needs.This applies to 15 residents (R1, R4, R6, R8-R11, R14-R21) reviewed for daily staffing levels. The findings include: 1. R1's 12/22/2025 Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed she is cognitively intact. On 2/20/2026 at 10:41 AM, R1 stated her shower days are Mondays on day shift and Thursdays on evening shift. R1 stated she did not get her shower the evening before on 2/19. R1 stated staff did not get her up and staff had to supervise the residents in the TV room. R1 stated they never have enough help.last Sunday, they had no help. On 2/24/2026 at 2:41 PM, V6 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated she was assigned to R1 on 2/19/2026. V6 stated she gave R1 a bed bath and not a shower since there was too much to do. V6 stated she wiped [R1's] hot spots and gave a quick wash down instead. V6 stated it was too hard to get R1 up with the mechanical lift for a shower since CNAs have three showers to give when they work short, she did not complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure progress notes and orders from a Dermatologist were obtained and carried out in a timely manner for a resident with basal cell carcinoma.This applies to 1 resident (R2) reviewed for non-pressure wounds. Findings include: On 2/20/2026 at 10:40 AM, R2 was in the activity room with other residents. R2's left cheek had a wound on it that was open to air. R2's fingernails were long and were stained with a dried red substance. At 11:45 AM, V3 LPN/WCD (Licensed Practical Nurse/Wound Care Director) stated R2 has a state guardian and the Wound Care Nurse Practitioner sees R2 weekly. V3 stated staff try to put a wound dressing on R2's face to cover the lesion but he removes it, and he likes to pick at the area.R2's faxed Dermatologist notes from his 2/4/2026 appointment showed a 2/9/2026 post-biopsy addendum identifying his lesion as basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The Assessment and Plan section of R2's 2/4/2026 notes showed his lesion was exacerbated from scratching and R2 had bloody residue under his left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 6. The findings include:R1's face sheet showed she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of bronchus or lung, tachycardia, congestive heart failure, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), chronic respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism without acute cor pulmonale, and asthma.R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed an order for Prednisone 30 MG (Milligrams) once daily for three days starting on 1/18/2026 due to be given at 5 PM through 1/20/2026. R1's EMR showed the next order for Prednisone 40 MG once daily was ordered on 1/20/2026 starting on 1/21/2026 for seven days. R1's MAR (Medication Administration Record) showed R1 received the Prednisone 30 MG on 1/18/2026 and 1/19/2026, but the dose was not given on 1/20/2026. On 1/27/2026 at 3:25 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said V8 (Pulmonary NP/Nurse Practitioner) ordered a new dose of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriately sized incontinence briefs to a resident to prevent skin irritation. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 11. The findings include:On September 23, 2025 at 11:36 AM, R1 said she had requested the white incontinence briefs but were not given them. R1 said she had the green incontinence brief on, which were not comfortable for her. At 1:59 PM, R1 said she had skin irritation from the green incontinence brief, as they were too small for her. At 2:16 PM, R1's skin was checked by V6 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) and V7 (Infection Control nurse), and her perineal area and bilateral groin areas were excoriated and red. R1 said the redness was because the brief was too small. When V6 was wiping R1's perineal and groin areas, R1 was wincing and said those areas hurt. On September 23, 2025 at 1:55 PM, V5 (CNA) said she had taken care of R1 before, and the green briefs did not fit her. V5 said R1's thighs were irritated, and she had notified the nurse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen in a manner that prevent foodborne illness.This applies to 128 residents receiving dietary services.Findings include:On 07/22/2025 at 3:01 PM, V1 Administrator confirmed 128 residents were receiving food services from the dietary department.On 07/22/2025 at 09:02 AM, the kitchen tour began with V32 (Dietary Manager).V32 stated the dishwasher disinfects by temperature. The goal is 180 degrees F (Fahrenheit). The staff are to look at the gauge and the test strip to assure the temperature reach 180 degrees F.V35 (Dishwasher) ran a load of dishes to test the dishwasher temperature. V35 stated the wash temperature should reach 180 degrees to disinfect the dishes. V35 placed a temperature sensitive test strip that read 160-degree F / 71 degree C (Celsius) on a plate. The wash cycle gauge maximum temperature reached 148 degrees F. The rinse tank gauge maximum temperature was 156 degrees F. The temperature sensitive test strip…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents to self-medicate. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R96, R16, R2, R25) reviewed for self-administration in a sample of 30. The findings include: 1. On July 22, 2025 at 11:32 AM, R96 was sleeping in bed. R96’s bedside table had a medication cup with five medications within it. The medication cup had two round, chewable tablets, one orange and one red. The medication cup also had three abnormally shaped medications, two of which were red and one purple. On July 24, 2025 at 12:50 PM, R96 said the medications in his cup were all Tums. R96 said the nurses did not stop to watch him take the Tums. R96 said he had his own bottle of Tums in the drawer next to his bed, which he said the CNAs (Certified Nurse Assistant) would grab for him when he asked for it. R96 said on July 22, 2025, of the five Tums in the medication cup, he ate two of the Tums from the facility nurse and two of his own supply of Tums. R96’s drawer had a bottle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store medications.This applies to 10 out of 10 residents (R136, R153, R154, R155, R156, R126, R127, R138, R66, and R52) reviewed for medication storage in a sample of 30.Findings include:1. On 7/23/2025 at 10:20 AM, the facility's first floor medication room fridge and a medication cart that housed R136's and R152's medications was checked for medication storage with V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON). R136 and R153's opened Ozempic pens were stored in the fridge. The pens were not labeled with opened-on dates, and the weekly pre-scheduled dates for dosage administrations had been left blank. R154's opened Lispro pen was also stored in the fridge without an opened-on date. R136 and R154's opened Albuterol inhalers were stored in the medication cart and did not include their opened-on dates. R136's Order Summary Report dated 7/23/2025 showed orders for Ozempic subcutaneous solution pen-Injector and Albuterol inhaler.2. R153's Order Summary Report dated 7/23/2025 showed an order for Ozempic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement transmission-based precautions for a resident with an acute GI (gastrointestinal infection). The facility also failed to follow contact and enhanced-barrier precautions and hand-hygiene when providing resident care.This applies to 5 out of 5 residents (R152, R117, R41, R104, and R8) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 30. The findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 1:30 PM, V36 (Physician) was assessing R152 in her room. R152’s room did not have any posted transmission-based precautions sign. V36 was not wearing any PPE (Personal Protective Equipment). At 1:35 PM, R152 said she had ongoing diarrhea that started on [DATE]. R152 said her stool was collected to check for C. diff (Clostridium difficile is an acute contagious GI infection) and the results were pending. R152 said she was not placed on transmission-based precautions for her suspected GI infection and staff was continuing to provide her care. On [DATE] at 1:15 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its antibiotic stewardship program to monitor residents receiving antibiotics.This applies to 4 out of 4 residents (R152, R75, R117, and R136) reviewed for antibiotic use in a sample of 30. The findings include:1. On 7/23/2025 at 1:00 PM, V13 (Infection Preventionist/IP Nurse) said the facility's antibiotic stewardship program was to ensure safe antibiotic use. V13 said inappropriate use could result in antibiotic overuse and resistance. V13 said she was responsible for completing antibiotic review forms in the residents' EMRs (Electronical Medical Records) when admitted with or prescribed antibiotics. V13 said the facility determined appropriate antibiotic use based on the McGeer Criteria and if determined inappropriate the prescribing provider was notified to ensure safe use.V13 reviewed R152, R75, R117, and R136's EMRs and said they received antibiotics as prescribed. V13 said their antibiotic review forms were not completed to determine if they met the McGeer Criteria for appropriate use. On 7/23/2025 at 3:45…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide maintenance services for a safe, comfortable and homelike environment. This applies to 1 of 1 (R48) resident reviewed for safe home like environment, in a sample of 30Findings include:On 07/22/2025 at 10:37 AM the molding of R48's cardiac table, stationed next to R48's bed, was broken and hanging downwards. R48 stated it had been broken for more than two weeks, that he had asked them to repair it and it was not done yet. On 7/23/25 at 2:15 PM the molding of R48's over bed table was still broken and hanging to the floor. R48 stated he had told multiple nursing staff about it.On 7/24/25 at 1:10 PM the molding around R48's cardiac table next to R48's bed was still broken and hanging downwards. On 7/24/25 at 1:10 PM, V5 (RN-Registered Nurse) stated, resident could scrape his skin due to the broken over-bed table.On 7/24/25 at 1:30 PM V29 (Maintenance Director) stated, he did not know about the broken table and that nobody had informed him about it. V29 stated, it could be a cause for potential injury to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to facilitate non-discriminatory discharge planning that meets the resident's preferences by allowing the resident to remain in the facility and paying privately for a bed.This applies to 1 resident (R5) reviewed for discharge planning in a sample of 30 residents.Findings include:On 7/22/25 at 11:53 AM, R5 and V31 (R5's Son-in Law) said they are concerned because they want R5 to be able to remain in the facility, but they were told R5 is going to be transferred to another facility on 7/29/25 when her Medicare days run out. V31 said they had a meeting with the facility staff and told the staff they want to remain in the facility after the 29th as private pay, but the staff said they will not have a room for R5 after 7/29/25.V1's (Administrator) progress note dated 7/10/25 at 9:12AM states V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) and V1 met with R5's POA (Power of Attorney) and son to discuss discharge planning. Progress note states R5's 100th day is on 7/29/25 and V1 explained to POA that at this time the facility does not have long term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise resident care plans to reflect significant incidents/changes in condition. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R25 and R36) reviewed for care plans in a sample of 30. The findings include: 1. R25’s face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gout, dependence of renal dialysis, lymphedema, osteoarthritis, and hypertension. R25 had a fall incident on June 13, 2025 at 4:15 AM per V45’s (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) “Post Fall Observation” assessment form. V45’s progress noted dated June 13,2025, states she saw R25 “tipped back against the wall with her legs in the air and her head tilted to the right against the wall.” Per V45, “leaving her (R25) on the floor was not an option due to the Hoyer lift being stuck under the geri-chair.” V45’s “Post-Fall Observation” assessment form dated June 13, 2025, states that resident sustained a fall in her room and was sent to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care for a dependent resident.This applies to 1 of 9 residents (R11) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) in a sample of 30 .Findings include:On 07/24/2025 at 12:29 PM, a head-to-toe skin check for R11 was conducted with V40 RN (Registered Nurse). V40 RN stated R11 sacral area was a little red due to frequent stooling related a chronic infection. V40 stated to minimize the irritation R11 is cleaned frequently, and barrier cream is applied. Before V40 started the skin assessment R11 requested butt cream be applied. When V40 RN pulled R11 blanket and top sheet back, her undergarment was saturated and soaked through to her bottom sheet. R11 had stool up through her vagina and her buttocks were reddened. No barrier cream was noted on R11.On 07/24/2025 at 12:44 PM, V41 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) assigned to R11 stated her work shift started at 06:00 AM. V41 stated the last time she provided incontinence care to R11 was between 08:00 and 08:30 AM. V41 stated she saw R11 at 10:00 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's equipment and environment were free from accident hazards, and failed to ensure a resident with known wandering habits was supervised to prevent a fall. This failure resulted in the emergent transfer to the hospital for 2 residents due to fall incidents. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R25 and R36) reviewed for accidents and supervision in a sample of 30. The findings include: 1. R25’s face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gout, dependence of renal dialysis, lymphedema, osteoarthritis, and hypertension. R25’s MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated May 5, 2025, shows R25 is cognitively intact, non-ambulatory, and requires total assist with transfers with 2 staff members via Hoyer lift. R25’s latest fall risk assessment (prior to fall on June 13,2025) dated January 25, 2024, states R25 has a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely maintain and reconcile controlled medication counting logs for residents receiving narcotics.This applies to 2 out of 3 residents (R11 and R34) reviewed for narcotics in a sample of 30.Findings include:1. On 7/23/2025 at 10:40 AM, R11's Tramadol 50 mg (milligrams) medication punch card was observed with no tablets available. R11's Controlled Substances Proof of Use sheet for Tramadol showed R11 had 1 tablet remaining for use. R11's Pregabalin 75 mg medication punch cards were observed with 30 capsules available. R11's Controlled Substance Proof of Use sheet for Pregabalin showed R11 had 31 capsules remaining for use. The Pregabalin punch cards showed #5, #8, #14, and #16 medication punch slots were torn with loose capsules inside, not secured. V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) was present during the observations and said she was not sure why the medication logs were inaccurate. V3 said controlled medications had to be logged when removed and if not properly secured they had to be reconciled and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct quarterly Interdisciplinary Team meetings and invite residents and / or their POA (Power of Attorney) to participate in their care planning process. This applies to 6 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, and R6) reviewed for care plan meetings in a sample of 6. Findings include: On 6/6/25 at 7:55 AM, V3 (Family Member) stated she and R1 had not attended a care plan meeting in over a year. On 6/6/25 at 1:34 PM, R1 stated V3 is her POA would be the one to attend her care plan meetings. On 6/6/25 at 10:25 AM, R2 stated she had no knowledge of what a care plan meeting was. On 6/6/25 at 10:40 AM, R6 stated she has never had a care plan meeting. On 6/6/25 at 10:53 AM, R5 stated she has never had a care plan meeting. On 6/6/25 at 11:07 AM, R4 and V4 (Family Member) stated they had not been invited to a care plan meeting. On 6/6/25 at 11:25 AM, R3 stated she did not know the facility conducted care plan meetings. R3 stated she did not think her brother had been invited to a care plan meeting for her. On 6/6/25 at 12:24 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have physician-ordered medications available. This applies to 3 of 7 residents (R1, R2 and R3) reviewed for medication availability in a sample of 6. Findings include: 1.On 6/6/25 at 7:55 AM, V3 (Family Member) stated she refills R1's medications from an outside pharmacy. V3 stated most of the medications are on auto-refill, but there are times the facility runs out of medication and don't notify her that a refill is needed. On 6/6/25 at 12:24 PM, the medication cart was reviewed with V5 LPN Licensed Practical Nurse assigned to R1 and R2. R1's regularly scheduled medications Ammonium Lactate 12% cream that are to be applied to the bottom of both feet every evening, and propylene glycol-glycerin 1-0.3% that are scheduled one drop to both eyes two times per day were not available. R1 had orders for Albuterol Sulfate inhalation aerosol solution 108 (90 base) MCG (Micrograms) that is taken every four hours as needed for wheezing related to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that was also unavailable. V5 LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow safe medication administration practice to avoid a significant medication error. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for significant medication error in a sample of 3. The findings include: On May 6, 2025 at 12:03 PM, R1 said a few weeks earlier, he was given three white pills which he was not supposed to take and were supposed to be for another resident. R1 said he went to the hospital to be evaluated for the reaction to the pills. On May 6, 2025 at 1:33 PM, V3 (RN/Registered Nurse) said she had floated onto a different unit than her normal and had received a phone call from the cardiologist. V3 said she had worked with R1 before but had misheard the cardiologist and did not realize there was another resident who had the same first name and same letter for the last name. V3 said she pulled the medication and went to R1's room and said the labs showed he needed his potassium replaced. V3 administered the potassium to R1 and after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications at ordered times. There were 31 opportunities with 8 errors resulting in a 25.8% medication error rate. This applies to 5 of 6 residents (R12, R13, R17, R18, R19) observed in the medication pass. 1) R12's electronic face sheet printed on 7/28/24 showed R12 has diagnoses including but not limited to dementia without behaviors, type 2 diabetes, diverticulitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, major depressive disorder. R12's medication administration record for July 2024 showed R12 receives famotidine 10mg at 8:00AM and memantine 10mg at 8:00AM and 4:00PM. On 7/28/24 at 10:30AM, V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse) administered R12's memantine 10mg. (2 hours and 30 minutes past the scheduled administration time). V3 was unable to locate R12's famotidine 10mg that was due to be administered at 8:00AM and stated it was reordered from the pharmacy on 7/27/24. On 7/28/24 at 11:25AM, V3 stated she normally comes in at 7AM but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident's wound, failed to initiate treatment as ordered by a physician for a resident (R1) that obtained a skin tear. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds in the sample of 19. The findings include: R1's electronic face sheet printed on 7/28/24 showed R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to heart failure, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and dementia with behaviors. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has mild cognitive impairment and does not have non-pressure wounds. R1's nursing progress notes dated 7/1/24 showed, 7/1/24 Writer alerted by CNA (certified nursing assistant) that resident was being transferred into bed and now has a skin tear. Writer entered resident room and observed a long laceration noted to right leg. Writer assessed area of laceration .resident right leg dressed with pressure dressing physician ordered to send to hospital for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment as ordered by a physician for a resident (R1) with a stage 4 pressure ulcer. This applies to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wounds in the sample of 19. The findings include: R1's electronic face sheet printed on 7/28/24 showed R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to heart failure, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and dementia with behaviors. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has mild cognitive impairment and has 1 stage 4 pressure wound. R1's care plan dated 4/10/24 showed, (R1) has potential for further pressure ulcer development/impaired skin integrity related to decreased mobility and comorbidities. Currently has a stage 4 pressure injury on sacrum. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. R1's wound physician note dated 4/25/24 showed, Stage 4 pressure injury to sacrum .recommend calcium alginate with dry dressing daily and as needed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R13) was free from a significant medication error. This applies to 1 of 6 residents observed in the medication pass. The findings include: R13's electronic face sheet printed on 7/28/24 showed R13 has diagnoses including but not limited to pulmonary hypertension, anemia, chronic atrial fibrillation, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. R13's medication administration record for July 2024 showed R12 receives apixaban 2.5mg at 8:00AM and 8:00PM. On 7/28/24 at 11:25AM, V3 was passing medications for R13 and stated she was unable to find any apixaban 2.5mg to administer to R13. V3 stated this would be considered a medication error due to R13 being unable to receive her ordered medication. V3 stated R13's apixaban was ordered on 7/27/24 and it must have been after the last dose was given. On 7/28/24 at 3:29PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, We do not keep apixaban in our extra supply of medications. This would be considered a significant medication error to it being an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure menus were followed. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for menus in the sample of 19. The findings include: R4's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia, vascular dementia with anxiety, vision loss, and protein calorie malnutrition. R4's care plan initiated 7/6/2023 showed, Nutrition: On Therapeutic diet . Obtain food preferences/dislikes . Provide some encouragement to increase oral intake as needed. Offer substitute on food dislikes . R4's Dietary Profile dated 7/12/24 showed, . Likes to eat/drink . coffee, juice, bacon, eggs, oatmeal with brown sugar . R4's Dietary Ticket for Sunday, July 28 showed, . choice of vitamin C juice, fresh fruit; choice of hot or cold cereal, Entree: Scrambled Egg; Sides: Crispy bacon strip . Likes/serve: Oatmeal (2 bowls), coffee, juice, Double Protein. Dislikes: Sausage . On 7/28/24 at 10:05 AM, V10 RN (Registered Nurse) went into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident medications were available for administration for 2 of 3 residents (R3, R4) reviewed for medications in the sample of 4. The findings include: 1. R3's face sheet printed on 6/27/24 showed an admission date of 6/18/24. The same face sheet showed diagnoses including but not limited to surgical after care following respiratory system surgery, larynx and glottis cancer, tracheostomy, major depression, and anxiety disorder. R3's admission assessment showed no cognitive impairment. On 6/27/24 at 9:44 AM, R3 communicated via handwritten notes, she did not receive her anti-anxiety medication when she arrived at the facility. R3 said she has severe anxiety and missed several doses before anyone finally gave her the medication. R3's progress notes showed a facility arrival day of 6/18/24 at 5:00 PM. R3's June 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record) showed an order start dated 6/18/24 at 5 PM for bupropion 75 milligrams two times a day for depression and 15 milligrams two times a day for anxiety. The MAR showed an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices with regards to hand hygiene and gloving during provisions of incontinence carer and administration of medications. This applies to 4 of 31 residents (R79, R85, R94, R503) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 31. The findings include: 1. Face sheet shows that R503 is 70 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) Resistance in the urine, and urinary tract infection. R503 was observed on isolation. On June 3, 2024, at 10:50 AM, V21 (Nurse) stated R503 was on isolation for ESBL in urine. On June 4, 2024, at 3:21 PM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V15 (Wound Care CNA) rendered incontinence care to R503. V15 removed the soiled diaper which was heavily saturated with urine. V15 changed her gloves without hand hygiene. V15 wiped R503's buttocks then she took the clean incontinence pad and diaper and placed it underneath R503 while wearing same gloves. V14 continued to changed gloves multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who requires assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) care were assisted for shaving and nail clipping. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R84, R85) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 31. The findings include: 1. According from face sheet, R85 is 80 years-old who has multiple medical diagnose which include dependence on hemodialysis. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], shows R85 is alert and oriented, and requires substantial to maximum assistance with hygiene and grooming. On June 4, 2024, at 1:54 PM, R85 was in bed resting. R85 displayed long dirty fingernails with black/brown substances underneath his fingernails. He had unkept, overgrown facial hair. R85 said that he would like his facial hair shaven, and his nails clipped, this would be more comfortable for him. On June 4, 2024, at 2:11 PM, V19 (Nurse) was prompted to assess R85's nails and said that she would clip it and clean…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's medications were administered by the nurse and not left at the bedside for the resident to take on his own. This applies to 1 of 31 residents (R41) reviewed for medications at the bedside in the sample of 31. The findings include: R41 had multiple diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, altered mental status, alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, cognitive communication deficit, bipolar disorder and hypocalcemia, based on the face sheet. R41's admission MDS (minimum data set) dated March 30, 2024 showed R41 was moderately impaired with cognition. The MDS showed R41 had functional limitation/impairment on both sides of his upper extremities. The same MDS showed R41 required maximum to total assistance from the staff with regards to most of his ADLs (activities of daily living). On June 3,2024 at 11:32 AM, R41 was in bed, alert and verbally responsive. R41 was observed attempting to take his medications from a medication cup and had spilled his pills on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order and treatment plan for a resident who has pressure ulcers. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R503) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 31. The findings include: On June 4, 2024, at 3:00 PM, R503 was sitting at the edge of the bed. R503 was alert but forgetful. When R503 was asked if received wound treatment that day, R503 replied that she could not remember if wound care was done. R503 laid down in bed and showed her wounds. R503 had pressure ulcers to her left and right inner buttocks which extends down to the gluteal folds and posterior left and right thighs. The wounds were uncovered. There was no trace of any ointment or cream to her wounds. The wound bed looks tender and raw. The spot at the edge of the bed where R503 was sitting was heavily saturated with urine which shows brown ring formation at the edges of the wetness on the fitted sheet. R503 was unable to recall of when she was last changed or cleaned for incontinence care. On June 4, 2024, at 3:30 PM, V20 (Wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and provide splints and therapy services to residents, to prevent further reduction in ROM (range of motion). This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R34 and R40) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 31. The findings include: 1. R34 had multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, based on the face sheet. R34's annual MDS (minimum data set) dated April 19, 2024 showed R34 was moderately impaired with cognition. The MDS showed R34 had impairment in range of motion on one side of both upper and lower extremities. The same MDS showed that R34 required maximum to total assistance from the staff with her ADL's (activities of daily living). On June 3, 2024 at 10:56 AM, R34 was sitting in her wheelchair inside her room. R34 was alert, verbally responsive and was able to respond appropriately to questions. R34 had left arm and left hand weakness. R34 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and peri-care in a manner that would prevent urinary tract infection (UTI). This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R94, R503) reviewed for bowel and bladder care in the sample of 31. The findings include: 1. Face sheet shows that R503 is 70 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include Extended Spectrum Beta Lactamase (ESBL) Resistance in the urine, and urinary tract infection. On June 4, 2024, at 03:00 PM, R503 was sitting at the edge of her bed. R503 was alert but forgetful. R503's incontinence brief was heavily saturated with urine which overflowed to the incontinence pad and fitted bedsheet. The urine flowed down the side of the mattress and was observed with brown ring formation at the edge of the wetness. R503 was unable to say the exact time of when she was last checked and change for incontinence. On June 4, 2024, at 3:21 PM, V14 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V15 (Wound Care CNA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to change a resident's Midline line dressing per facility policy and procedure. This applies to 1 of 3 resident's (R19) reviewed for IV (intravenous) catheter care in the sample of 31. The findings include: R19 had multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, based on the face sheet. R19's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated April 23, 2024 showed R19 was moderately impaired with cognition. On June 3, 2024 at 10:45 AM, R19 was in bed, alert, verbally responsive but with confusion. R19 had a single lumen Midline catheter (inserted into a vein) on her right inner upper arm. R19's Midline catheter site had a gauze dressing covered with a transparent tape and the dressing was dated 5/31/24. The transparent tape covering the gauze dressing was not intact. The tape was rolling and loose towards the antecubital fossa (depression located between the forearm and front of the arm). The transparent tape was not fully sealing the Midline catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medication as prescribed by the physician and failed to ensure the medications being administered via gastrostomy tube were completely given to the resident. There were 6 errors observed out of the 25-medication opportunities resulting in a 24% medication error rate. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R112, R129) reviewed during medication pass in the sample of 31. The findings include: 1. On June 4, 2024, at 4:45 PM, V11 (Nurse) checked R112's blood sugar level. R112's blood sugar showed 213 milligram (mg)/deciliter (dl). V11 administered Insulin Fiasp 5 units to R112. V11 confirmed to surveyor that it was the only dose prescribed by the physician for that hour. R112's Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed to give Insulin Fiasp (Insulin Aspart with Niacinamide)1000 units/ml. Inject 5 units subcutaneously three times a day for diabetes hold for blood sugar less than 140 mg/dl. The same MAR showed to give Fiasp Injection Solution 100 UNIT/ML (Insulin Aspart (with Niacinamide). Inject as per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility dietary staff failed to follow a resident's tray card and served the resident a food item she was known to be allergic to. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R18) reviewed for food allergies in the sample of 31. The findings include: R18's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including congestive heart failure, other sequelae following unspecified cerebral vascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, polyneuropathy, and unspecified dementia. R18's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated May 21, 2024, showed R18 had moderate cognitive impairment, and required staff assistance with ADL's (Activities of daily Living) including dependent on staff for lower body dressing, and transfer and required substantial assistance with eating, bed mobility, bathing, toileting, and personal hygiene. R18's EMR physician order summary, showed R18's diet order, initiated on May 29, 2024, was regular texture,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food to residents at a palatable temperature. This has the potential to affect all 155 residents consuming food from the kitchen. The Findings include: On 9/21/23 at 10:29 AM, V4 (Dietary Director) stated, We have 155 residents eating from the kitchen. R2 is a [AGE] year-old female with moderate cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 9/20/23 at 9:05 AM, R2 stated, Eggs were cold for today's breakfast. The coffee was lukewarm. R3 is an [AGE] year-old female with moderate cognitive impairment as per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 9/20/23 at 9:10 AM, R3 stated, Food is always cold; It's terrible that the egg was cold in the morning, and I sent it back. I didn't eat it. Bacon was also cold. R4 is an [AGE] year-old male with mild cognitive impairment per Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE]. On 9/20/23 at 9:25 AM, R4 stated, Lots of time, food is cold. You are getting something not as warm as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with eating in a dignified manner for 2 of 26 residents (R91 and R105) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 26. The findings include: 1. On 5/22/23 during the noon meal, V10 (Social Service Designee) was standing up feeding R105 in the dining room. 2. On 5/22/23 during the noon meal, V11, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was standing up feeding R91 in the dining room. On 5/23/23 1:40 PM, V18 (CNA) said that staff should always be sitting down and eye to eye with a resident when feeding them. V18 stated, They will eat better that way. The facility Assistance with Meals Policy revised July 2017 shows, Residents who cannot feed themselves will be fed with attention to safety, comfort and dignity, for example: Not standing over residents while assisting them with meals

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for a resident who is dependent on staff for assistance for 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed for call lights in the sample of 26. The findings include: R57's Face sheet printed 5/23/23 showed diagnoses to include, but not limited to chronic congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease, osteoporosis, adult failure to thrive, major depressive disorder, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 2. On 5/23/23 at 10:42 AM, R57 was sitting in his recliner chair in the middle of the room. The call light was lying on the bed out of R57's reach. At 10:43 AM, V17 License Practical Nurse (LPN) came into R57's room and said, Where is your call light. Let me find it? On 5/24/23 at 8:43 AM, V15 LPN said it (call light) is important for his safety and for him to get help when he needs it. They (residents) may fall because of trying to reach the call light if it is not where they can reach it. V15 said if in an emergency,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with dysphagia was fed safely and failed to ensure a gait belt was used to safely transfer a resident for 2 of 26 residents (R14 and R27) reviewed for safety in the sample of 26. The findings include: 1. R14's Speech Therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] shows that she has a diagnosis of dementia, Parkinson's disease and dysphagia. R14's discharge recommendations shows, To facilitate safety and efficiency, it is recommended the patient use the following strategies during oral intake: general swallow techniques/precautions, bolus size modifications and alternation of liquid/solids along with the following maneuvers: head turn to unaffected side. On 5/22/23 during the noon meal, V8 (Resident Aide) was in the dining room feeding R14 a mechanically altered diet. On 5/24/23 at 9:50 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said that Resident Aides are not allowed to feed residents. The facility's Hospitality Aide Job Description does not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a urinary drainage bag was secure and off the floor for a resident and failed to ensure incontinence care was thoroughly completed for a resident. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R22 & R19) reviewed for catheters and urinary tract infections in the sample of 23. The findings include: 1. R22's face sheet shows he has diagnoses including: calculus of the kidney, presence of urogenital implants, chronic kidney disease, and encounter for artificial openings of urinary tract. R22's Order Summary Report shows he is on contact isolation for ESBL and VRE (bacterial infections) in the urine. R22's active care plan shows he has a nephrostomy tube (catheter inserted in the kidney to drain urine). R22's 5/20/23 2:01 PM, Progress Notes shows R22 is on an antibiotic for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). On 5/22/23 at 10:24 AM, R22 was sitting in the dining area doing an activity. A urinary drainage bag was seen under R22's wheelchair resting on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was observed during medication administration for 1 of 26 residents (R39) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 26. The findings include: On 5/22/23 at 10:11 AM, R39 was in her room with her breakfast tray in front of her. On the tray was a plastic medicine cup with 2 yellow pills and 2 white pills. R39 said she was not sure when the pills were left, she must have fallen asleep. R39 was unable to indicate what pills were in the cup. On 5/22/23 at 10:17 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse/RN) said she was the nurse who left the medication in the room for R39 and it was 2 Tylenol and 2 baby aspirin. V5 said she was sorry and she should have stayed in the room and watched R39 take her medication. R39's Physician Order Summary Report shows she has orders for Acetaminophen 325 milligrams (mg.) give 2 tablets by mouth four times a day and an order for Aspirin 81 mg. give 2 tablets by mouth one time a day. R39's Physician Order Summary does not show an order for R39 to self-administer her medications.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) anti-anxiety (psychotropic) medications had a duration/end date. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R429, R48) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 26. The findings include: 1. On 5/23/2023, R429's Order Summary Report, dated 5/23/2023, shows an order for Lorazepam Oral Concentrate 2MG/ML - Give 0.5mg every 4 hours as needed for Anxiety/Agitation with a start date of 5/3/2023 and no specified end date. 2. On 5/23/2023, R48's Order Summary Report, dated 5/23/2023, shows an order for Lorazepam Concentrate 2MG/ML - Give 0.25 ml every 6 hours as needed for agitation and restlessness with a start date of 6/17/2022 and no specified end date. On 5/23/2023 at 1:22PM, V3 Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) said PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications must indicate a stop date of 14 days. The facility's Antipsychotic Medication Use policy, revised December 2016, states the need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility staff failed to ensure the ordered dose of insulin was administered to a resident for 1 of 4 residents (R88) reviewed for significant medication errors in the sample of 26. The findings include: On 5/23/22 at 9:29 AM, V13 (Registered Nurse) brought a glucometer and R88's insulin pen into R88's room. V13 checked R88's blood sugar. R88's blood sugar was 165. Without exiting the room to verify the insulin dose needed, V13 attached the needle to the pen and primed the pen. V13 then turned the dial to 2 units and said that she would be giving 2 units. This surveyor verified that the pen was set to 2 units. V13 administered 2 units of insulin to R88 in his left upper arm. R88's Physician's Order Sheet printed on 5/24/23 shows an order for, Humalog Kwik Pen-Inject as per sliding scale: if 150-199 = give 1 unit: 200-249 = give 2 units . On 5/24/23 at 10:58 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said that if a resident gets sliding scale insulin, the blood sugar should be check and then the nurse should refer to the order to see how much…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet were served protein at the noon meal. This applies to 2 of 15 residents (R6 & R14) reviewed for pureed diets in the sample of 26. The findings include: The facility menu for the noon meal on May 22, 2023 showed, Entrée: golden oven fried chicken, baked beans, chuckwagon corn, dinner roll or shrimp fettuccine alfredo, mixed green salad, choice of dressing, broccoli florets . On May 22, 2023 at 12:03 PM, V7 Dietary Aide was serving the noon meal to residents on the third floor. Residents receiving a puree diet were to get pureed chicken, pureed baked beans and pureed creamed corn. Mashed potatoes were also available. V7 Dietary Aide served R14 and R6 pureed baked beans, pureed creamed corn and mashed potatoes with gravy. R14 and R6 did not get any pureed chicken (protein) at the noon meal. On May 23, 2023 at 1:34 PM, V14 Dietary Manager stated, residents should get a meat, starch and veggie at every meal. The facility did not provide a policy on pureed diets.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$57,714 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $36,986 — penalty dated 2025-01-13
  • $20,728 — penalty dated 2024-12-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHRIS VANGEL GST EXEMPT DESCENDANTS TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 08/22/2005
JAFARI FAMILY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 08/22/2005
KATHERINE HOCUK GST EXEMPT DESCENDANTS TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 08/26/2005
LOUIS WILLIAM DIMAS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 08/26/2005
RBJ INVESTMENTS LPOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 08/22/2005
VANGEL, DOROTHYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST13%since 08/22/2005
VANGEL, NICHOLASIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR13%since 08/22/2005
VANGEL, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/07/2005
JAFARI, KIANOOSHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/07/2005

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.5M
Related-party expense27% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 27%Other / private 34%

This home reported $6.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$445per resident / day
operating cost
$13,529per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$440per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146093. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next