Nexus at Mascoutah

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 64% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 47.8 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly clean an indwelling urinary catheter, failed to complete and document indwelling catheter care as ordered, failed to verify an indwelling urinary catheter flush order, failed to monitor intake and output as ordered, and failed to ensure a resident's indwelling was properly positioned and covered for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, R5) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in the sample of 11. These failures caused R2 to experience increased pain and sepsis secondary to developing a catheter associated urinary tract infection. Findings Include:1. R2's admission Record document, print date of 8/18/25, documented R2 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Wernicke's encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic gout, insomnia, alcohol abuse, major depressive disorder, polyneuropathy, hypertension, and obstructive and reflux uropathy.R2's MDS, dated [DATE], documented R2 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide resident care in a timely manner to promote resident's dignity for 3 of 5 residents (R1, R2, and R5) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 5. This failure resulted in R2 having feelings of frustration due to soiling herself and being left on a bedpan for 29 minutes and reporting pain related to this. Findings include: 1. R2's Face sheet documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, in part, congenital subaortic stenosis, type two diabetes mellitus, and acquired absence of bilateral legs below the knee. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented she was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for toileting hygiene assistance. R2's Care Plan dated 6/27/25 documented she was at risk for skin complications related to immobility. R2's Care Plan dated 6/20/25 documented she has an alteration in comfort advanced disease process, chronic physical or psychological disability circulatory,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure an environment free from abuse for 2 of 4 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. This Failure caused R1 to be fearful of R2 and causes her to have trouble sleeping. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documents, R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, anxiety, depression, osteoarthritis, and muscle weakness and atrophy. R1's Minimum Data Set, (MDS), dated [DATE] documented, R1 was independent with cognitive skills for daily decision making with short term memory intact. The MDS documented R1 required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and transfer and ambulated with manual wheelchair. R1's Undated Care Plan, documents, R1 is at risk for abuse and neglect. R2's Face Sheet, documents, R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, including encephalopathy, multiple sclerosis, difficulty…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The Facility failed to ensure a bruise of unknown origin was investigated and the appropriate corrective actions were initiated for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for injuries in the sample of 9. Findings include: R2's Physician Order Sheet for January 2024 documents a diagnosis of: Abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, displaced supracondylar fracture without intercondylar extension of lower end of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, abnormal weight gain, cognitive communication deficit, major depression, paraplegia, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, anemia, acute infraction of spinal cord, pressure ulcer of sacral region, and altered mental status. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) documents she is moderately impaired for cognition. Bed mobility R2 was scored as 3/3 (extensive assist of two plus staff). Transfer 4/3, (total dependence on staff of two plus staff members). R2 does not walk, for toilet use she was scored a 4/3, and for personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure a safe transfer for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for transfers in the sample of 9. This failure resulted in R2 being picked up by staff after a fall and transferred to a chair and sent out to the hospital later where she sustained a tibia spiral fracture. Findings include: R2's Physician Order Sheet for January 2024 documents a diagnosis of : Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abnormalities of gait and mobility, lack of coordination, displaced supracondylar fracture without intercondylar extension of lower end of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, abnormal weight gain, cognitive communication deficit, major depression, reflex neuropathic bladder, paraplegia, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, anemia, acute infraction of spinal cord, pressure ulcer of sacral region, and altered mental status. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) documents she is moderately impaired for cognition. Bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse for 4 of 5 residents (R4, R13, R38, R102) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 43. This failure resulted R102 who is demented being fondled by R38 in the dining room and a reasonable person would not want to be sexually fondled/abused. Findings include: 1.R38's Face Sheet, with print date of 10/192/3, documents R38 has diagnoses of personal history of traumatic brain injury, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and altered mental status. R38's Care Plan, dated 9/11/23, documents Resident's memory is impaired, and resident has difficulty with decision-making, insight, logic, planning, and organization of the thoughts. The Care Plan Interventions documented Provide clear explanations regarding expectations and procedures prior to providing care. R38's Care Plan documents Resident has a history of aggressive, inappropriate, attention-seeking and/or maladaptive behavior, but has demonstrated stability during the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility failed to conduct ongoing assessment and monitoring of a resident with significant weight loss for 1 of 5 residents (R12)reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 26. This failure resulted in continued weight loss for the resident. Findings include: On 8/31/22 at 1:14 PM, R12 was sitting in a geriatric chair at a table in the dining room and stated, I've been here before. R12 was feeding herself pureed spaghetti, mixed vegetables, ice cream, and cake fortified with powdered milk. R12's Face Sheet documents R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses including unspecified severe protein calorie malnutrition, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), abnormal weight loss, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, and gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. R12's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R12 has significant cognitive impairment and requires extensive 2+ person assistance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of resident medications in 2 of 7 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7. This past non-compliance occurred on 6/2/26 with a correction date of 6/2/26. Findings Include:1) R1's Face Sheet, undated, documents R1, in part, has the following diagnosis: Osteomyelitis, Malignant Neoplasm of the Endometrium, Pain in Bilateral Feet, Neuropathy, and OA (Osteoarthritis). R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 5/27/26, documents R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. R1's Care Plan, dated 5/4/23, documents R1 is at risk for abuse. R1's Progress Note, dated 6/2/26 9:00 PM, documents the following: Resident notified by administrator (she is her own responsible party) of an ongoing investigation regarding a potential medication diversion incident involving facility staff. Resident was informed that a review of medication administration records is being conducted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to verify and implement a consultant physician's instructions, failed to follow hospital discharge orders for normal saline indwelling urinary catheter flushes, and failed to document a resident's response to antibiotics for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 11.Findings include:R2's admission Record document, print date of 8/18/25, documented R2 was a [AGE] year-old male initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Wernicke's encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic gout, insomnia, alcohol abuse, major depressive disorder, polyneuropathy, hypertension, and obstructive and reflux uropathy.R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/14/25, documented R2 was severely cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for toileting and hygiene needs, and had an indwelling urinary catheter.R2's care plan, initiation date of 6/30/25, documented R2 required use of an indwelling catheter related to obstructive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the facilities policy and don proper PPE (personal protective equipment) while providing care for 2 of 3 (R1, R5) residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheter in the sample of 11. 1.R1's admission Record, print date of 8/18/25, documented R1 has diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, malnutrition, chronic fatigue, heart failure, altered mental status, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, cognitive communication deficit, hypertension, and acquired absence of right shoulder. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 7/11/25, documented R1 is moderately cognitively impaired.R1's care plan, undated, documented R1 has an (indwelling urinary catheter) related to neurogenic bladder and is at risk of infection. R1's care plan also documented R1 requires enhanced barrier precautions with interventions including staff to wear gown and gloves when performing ADL'S (activities of daily living). On 8/18/25 at 8:38 AM R1 was observed in bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clean linen carts were kept covered and protected from contaminates. This failure has to potential to affect all 51 residents who reside at the facility. Findings include:On 07/21/25 at 10:15 AM, in the shower room/bathroom on the 100-hallway, the clean linen cart was sitting next to the commode in the shower room and the clean linen cart did not have the front cover pulled down to cover all the clean linen and thus the clean linen was exposed to different contaminates. In the shower room there was also dirty linen barrels as well as the clean linen.On 07/22/25 at 10:40 AM, in the women's shower room on the 200-hallway, the clean linen cart was sitting up against the wall with the cover thrown up over the top of the cart and all the linen on the cart was exposed. There were two barrels containing dirty linen on wheels sitting about three feet away from the clean linen.On 07/22/25 at 10:45 AM, in the men's shower room on the 200-hallway there was a clean linen cart sitting up against the wall with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to address residents needs by answering call lights in a timely manner for 4 of 5 residents (R1, R3, R4, and R6) reviewed for call lights in a sample of 9. Findings include:1. R1's Face Sheet, with original admission date of 01/15/18, documented R1 has diagnoses of but not limited to multiple sclerosis, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R1 is moderately cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 10 out of 15, she is dependent on staff for most of her activities of daily living (ADL), and she is always incontinent of bowel and bladder.On 07/22/25 at 9:55 AM, R1 said it can sometimes take the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) a little while to answer her call light.2. R3's Face Sheet, admission date of 06/20/25, documented R3 has diagnoses of but not limited to congenital subaortic stenosis, type II diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, and hypertension (HTN). R3's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent an employee from misappropriating narcotic pain medication for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for misappropriation of property in a sample of 3. Findings include: 1. R2's Undated Face Sheet documents she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of pain and GERD. R2's Undated Care Plan, documents chronic pain related to GERD and chronic knee pain. R2's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) dated 4/2025 and 5/2025 documents a physician's order, start date of 7/14/2024, hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams (mg) give 2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents resident is cognitively impaired and has occasional pain. R2's Controlled Drug Received Record/Disposition Form, received from the pharmacy on 7/26/2024 documents V4, Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN, signed off she administered hydrocodone 5-325 mg to R2 on 4/17/2025, 4/22/2025, 4/27/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure progressive fall interventions were in place and staff were aware of these interventions for 1 of 4 residents (R5) reviewed for falls in the sample of 7. Findings include: R5's Face Sheet documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, hypotension, dementia and abnormalities of gait and mobility. R5's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented R5 was severely cognitively impaired, used wheelchair and required partial assistance with walking. R5's Care Plan documents R5 is at risk for falls. R5's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documented R5 was at high risk for falls. R5's Fall Investigation dated 10/9/24 documents R5 tripped while ambulating and fell. There was no injury. R5's Care Plan Update on 10/9/24 documents staff were educated to ensure R5 is wearing grippy socks at all times when out of bed. R5's Fall Investigation dated 4/13/25 documents R5 was found on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident rights were respected regarding a social media post for 1 (R2) of 3 residents in a sample of 3. R2's Undated Face Sheet, documents R2 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pain, generalized anxiety disorder and mild cognitive impairment. R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents resident is alert. On 3/28/2025 at 9:32 AM V1, Administrator stated she recently received an anonymous call on Monday morning 3/24/2025, the call ID was blocked, and the caller reported that (V5), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) posted on social media talking about a resident and the anonymous caller sent screen shots of the social media post to V1. She stated no residents or facility name was listed in the post. V1 forwarded the social media screen shots to human resources, and they stated no issues because no residents were named and no facility was named. V5's Social Media Post dated 9/10/2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure progressive interventions were being implemented for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for falls in the sample of 6. Findings include: R2's Physician Order Sheet for October 2024 documents a diagnosis of encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hemiplegia affecting left non dominant side, cerebral infarction, diabetes, weakness, pain in right hip, unspecified convulsions, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified dementia, and unspecified psychosis. R2's Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 was moderately impaired for cognitive impairment for decision making of activities of daily living. R2 requires use of a wheelchair. R2 requires moderate assistance with showering and personal hygiene. He requires set up for eating, oral hygiene, upper and lower body dressing and taking off and applying footwear. R2 also has a (urinary) catheter and is frequently incontinent of bowel. R2's Fall risk evaluation dated 8/25/2024 at 6:07…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, cerebral infarction, and unspecified dementia with agitation. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 was moderately cognitively impaired, required partial assistance with bed mobility, was dependent with transfer, and ambulated via wheelchair. R1's Undated Care Plan documents R1 has potential to be verbally aggressive to other residents and staff related to poor impulse control. The Care Plan update on 11/26/22 documents, Pulled female resident's hair in dining room. The Care Plan update on 8/26/24 documents, Hit female resident in the mouth. R2's Face Sheet documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, and unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$73,886 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $14,170 — penalty dated 2025-07-07
• $30,602 — penalty dated 2024-04-26
• $19,890 — penalty dated 2024-01-12
• $9,224 — penalty dated 2023-10-24
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-25 for 32 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $158K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL