McLeansboro Rehab & Hlth C Ctr
405 West Carpenter, McLeansboro, IL 62859 · For profit - Individual · 43 certified beds · (618) 643-3728 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- the CMS record shows $45,123 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-07)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 65.4% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free from staff to resident abuse for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing burning pain and irritation as a result of hand sanitizer being applied to her bottom and legs, some areas of which had excoriation. A reasonable person would also experience feelings of intimidation, fear, emotional distress, and helplessness as a result. Findings include: R1's face Sheet documented an admission date of 6/23/2017, and diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Chronic Pain, Excoriation (skin picking) Disorder, Anxiety, Hypertension, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), and Osteoporosis. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated for 4/17/2024, documents that R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, indicating that R1 has severe cognitive impairment . The same MDS documents that R1 is totally dependent on at least two persons assist for transfers, bed mobility, dressing, eating, and toileting needs. On 5/1/2024 at 9:40am,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-05-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to follow through with a wound referral for a worsening pressure ulcer, failed to timely reassess and identify worsening pressure ulcer, and timely treat new wounds for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 16. This failure resulted in the worsening and infection of R12's pressure ulcer to the right ankle. Findings: R12's medical record, New admission Information documents an admission date of 1/03/2023 with diagnoses including Hypertension, Edema (multifactorial component of Congested Heart Failure/Venous Stasis). R12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents in Section C, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score is 9, moderately impaired cognition, Section G, Functional Status, Extensive Assistance with one-person physical assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene, Extensive assistance with two-person physical assistance with transfers and toileting. R12's Nursing admission Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse working 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility. The Findings Include: Nursing schedules reviewed for June 7, 2024 through June 24, 2024 revealed the facility did not have Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on Saturday, 6/15/24 and Sunday, 6/16/24. On 6/24/2024 at 1:45pm, V5 (Corporate Administrator) said the facility does not have the required 8 hours of continuous RN coverage per day. V5 said the lack of RN coverage occurs on the weekends. On 6/24/24 at 2:00pm, V1 (Administrator) said there are weekends that the facility does not have the required RN coverage of 8 hours a day minimum. V1 said she was just happy to have nurses to work over the weekends even if they are not RNs. V1 verified no Registered Nurse worked 6/15/24 and 6/16/24. The facility's Resident Matrix dated 6/24/2024 documents 35 residents reside at this facility.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse working 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 30 residents residing in the facility. The Findings Include: On 6/6/24 at 11:00 AM, V3 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated that there are weekends that she sometimes cannot get covered with a Registered Nurse (RN) working. V3 further stated that they do not use a staffing agency, but they have a PRN (as needed) float pool within the company and a list of facility specific PRN RN's that they attempt to have cover these shifts. V3 stated that they do have advertisements out to hire RN's but if there are times they cannot get RN's to cover the shift they use their LPN (Licensed Practical Nurses) staff. On 6/6/24 at 11:13 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that there are days that no RN works 8 hours a day minimum, but that all her nursing staff are either licensed or registered. Nursing schedules reviewed for May revealed that no RN worked on 5/18/24, 5/19/24 and 5/31/24. The June scheduled revealed that no RN worked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately coded for 1 (R8) of 12 reviewed for accuracy of assessments in the sample of 23. Findings Include: R8's admission Record documented R8 is [AGE] years old with an Initial admission Date to the facility of 01/03/2019. Diagnoses listed on this document included anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, anemia, depression, and unspecified dementia. The OBRA Initial Screen for R8 dated 09/04/2017 documented under Part III, The individual has been formally diagnosed with a mental illness verified by a DSMIV classification which subsequently impairs the person's cognitive, emotional and/or behavioral functioning, excluding organic disorders/dementia, developmental disabilities, and alcohol/substance abuse. This section had an X marked to indicate the answer Yes. This OBRA Initial Screen also documented that R8 had a history of psychiatric hospitalization, a history of outpatient mental health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to add new person centered fall interventions to prevent falls for 1 (R120) of 2 residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 23. The findings include: R120's admission Record documented R120 was [AGE] years old with an admission date to the facility of 3/11/2023. Diagnoses listed include unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, coronary artery dissection, essential (primary) hypertension, disorder of thyroid, unspecified, hyperlipidemia, unspecified, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, insomnia unspecified, unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site, muscle weakness (generalized), hypomagnesemia and other forms of dyspnea. R120's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section C, dated 5/8/2024, documents that R120 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, indicating R120 has severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS section GG0170, Mobility documents that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement abuse policies by not reporting abuse within the designated time frames for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 3. Findings Include: 1. R1's face Sheet documents an admission date of 6/23/2017 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Chronic Pain, Excoriation (skin picking) Disorder, Anxiety, Hypertension, GERD, and Osteoporosis. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated for 4/17/2024, documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2, indicating that R1 has severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS documents that R1 is totally dependent of at least two persons for transfers, bed mobility, dressing, eating, and toileting needs. On 5/1/2024 at 10:26am, V1 (Administrator) stated she was notified on 4/14/2024 at approximately 9:00am by V3 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) about an allegation of abuse. The allegation of abuse involved staff V11 (Certified Nurse's Assistant/CNA) to R1. V1 stated through the investigation process, it was discovered the actual incident occurred on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate and thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 3. The Findings Include: R3 's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 2/4/2021 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Anxiety. R3's Minimum Data Set, dated for 4/23/2024, documented R3 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R3 is cognitively intact. The same MDS documents that R3 requires set up assistance with showers/bathing and assistance of 1 to transfer in and out of shower chair for safety. On 5/2/2024 at 9:30am, R3 stated she was abused during a shower. R3 stated V12 (CNA) wadded up a washcloth and jabbed it in her stomach (belly button area). R3 stated it left a big red area and bothered her for a bit. R3 stated she wasn't sure of the date that it occurred, but it had been a little while, maybe a few weeks. R3 stated she reported it to V1 (Administrator) and things are better now because V1 changed R3's shower times so V12 will not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain the required specialized rehabilitative services for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for therapy services in a sample of 3. The findings include: R2's admission Record documents that R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of chronic kidney disease, unspecified, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, hyperlipidemia, unspecified, essential (primary) hypertension, unspecified atrial fibrillation, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, depression, unspecified, anemia in chronic kidney disease, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, edema, unspecified, and other seasonal allergic rhinitis. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents Section C, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating that R2 is cognitively intact. Section GG, Functional Abilities and Goals, of the same MDS documents that R2 requires setup or clean-up assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a registered nurse, at least 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 23 residents who reside at this facility. Findings include: On 11/13/2023, at 1:00 p.m., V2, (Director of Nursing), stated that the following dates in September 2023 (9/9, 9/13, 9/15), October 2023 (10/3, 10/5, 10/6,), and November 2023, (11/04) there was no registered nurse (RN) coverage for those days. The facility's nursing schedules for the months of September, October, & November 2023 documents the following dates with no RN coverage: September 2023 (9/9, 9/13, 9/15), October 2023 (10/3, 10/5, 10/6) and November 2023 (11/4). A facility document titled Daily Census dated 11/13/23 documented the facility had 23 residents residing in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide 8 hours daily, 7 days a week of Registered Nurse coverage for the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 19 residents living in the facility. Findings Include: The Nursing Schedules from January 2023 - May 4, 2023 documents no RN coverage was provided at the facility on 1/3, 1/14, 1/18, 1/19, 1/20, 1/21, 1/25, 1/26, 1/27, 2/4, 2/7, 2/8, 2/11, 2/18, 3/4, 3/11, 3/14, 3/22, 3/25, 3/26, 3/27, 3/31, 4/7, 4/8, 4/9, 4/14, 4/15, 4/20, 4/21, 4/22, 4/27, 4/28, & 5/1. On 5/4/2023 at 12:00 p.m., V1 (Acting Administrator) stated there are three registered nurses (RNs) that work at the facility. V1 stated that there is not a current Director of Nursing at the facility and that V3 (Regional RN) fills in at the facility at times. V1 verified the nursing schedules for January to May were accurate and they didn't have nurse coverage 8 hours a day 7 days a week. On 5/2/2023 - 5/04/2023, observed V3 (Regional RN) at the facility during this survey. The Resident Census and Conditions Form dated 5/1/2023 documents 19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$45,123 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $45,123 — penalty dated 2024-05-07
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-30 for 32 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $207K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145964. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.