No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Southgate Health Care Center

900 East Ninth Street, Metropolis, IL 62960 · For profit - Corporation · 140 certified beds · (618) 524-2683 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Mar 20252 immediate-jeopardy citations$20,170 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,170 in federal fines (most recent 2024-09-13)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
1001 E 5th St · (618) 524-8316 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1200 E 5th St · (618) 524-8424 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(618) 524-4712 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
714 Filmore St · (270) 933-3466

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased23.5%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.1%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.1%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.1%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication27.5%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.3%20.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table30.4%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.8%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission23.8%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.0%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.792.021.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.092.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.6%CMS range 41.3–64.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.6–18.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge43.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified84.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 3.8–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.45
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.16
RN hoursweekends
58.4%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 91.9 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 48 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.445 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.91 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-18)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-31)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide effective pain management for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R2, and R3) reviewed for pain in a sample of 4. This failure resulted in R1, who has a diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma and at the end-of-life stage, not receiving an ordered narcotic pain medication for 6 hours and R1 experiencing intense pain and suffering prior to her death.This failure resulted in Immediate jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on [DATE] when the facility ran out of R1's oral Dilaudid pain medication resulting in R1 experiencing uncontrolled pain. V1 (Administrator), V21 (Regional Clinical Coordinator), V2 (Director of Nursing, and V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 2:10PM. The immediacy was removed on [DATE], but non-compliance remained at a Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of In-service training.Findings Include:1.R1's admission Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-04-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to recognize the urgency of a worsening wound and seek immediate evaluation and treatment after noting a significant change in the condition of the wound for 1 (R38) of 7 residents reviewed for wound care in a sample of 77. This failure resulted in R38 developing gas gangrene with underlying osteomyelitis requiring emergent trans-metatarsal amputation and subsequent Chopart's (forefoot and midfoot) amputation and R38 has been placed on hospice care. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] when R38 was observed to have a significant change to an existing necrotic wound of the left 2nd toe. The new, necrotic area was observed starting between the previous necrotic left 2nd toe, migrating over between the left great toe and down to the bottom of the left foot. V1 (Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE] at 1:55pm. The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the Immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safely transfer 4 (R1, R2, R3, R11) of 5 residents reviewed for transfers in a sample of 11. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a large hematoma to the chest wall and requiring a 5-day hospitalization in the Special Care Unit for monitoring and pain management. Findings include: 1. R1's document titled admission Record documents an admission date of 2/28/2024 and includes diagnoses of fracture of femur, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Hyperlipidemia, Abnormal Posture. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/9/2024 includes a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 5 indicating sever cognitive impairment. Section GG of MDS documents Functional Limitation in Range of Motion R1 has impairment to both sides of upper extremities, and impairment on one side of Lower extremity. Mobility devices used is a wheelchair. Documentation includes R1 is Dependent for Bed mobility, sit to lying, lying to siting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-09-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor weights and implement interventions to prevent weight loss for 1 of 3 (R3) residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 8. This failure resulted in R3 sustaining 9.5% weight loss in less than 1 month and. a 14% weight loss in less than 3 months. Findings include: R3's admission Record documents an admission date of 9/6/2024 with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Mild protein-calorie malnutrition, Pulmonary Hypertension, Parkinson's Disease, and Repeated Falls. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating R3's cognition is intact. Section GG, Functional Abilities, indicates R3 requires set up or clean up assistance with eating. Section K, Swallowing/Nutritional Status, documents that R3 weighs 180 lbs, R3 has had a gain of 5% or more in the last month or a gain of 10% or more in the last 6 months, and R3 is not on a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide dependent residents timely ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance with toileting/incontinence care for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for ADL assistance in the sample of 11. R1's admission Record (print date 6/24/26) documented an original admission date of 8/2/23 and included diagnoses of cognitive deficit due to cerebral infarction, Alzheimer's disease, anemia, arthritis, cognitive communication deficit, and repeated falls.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. This MDS documents R1 is frequently incontinent of urine and bowel, is dependent upon staff for toileting hygiene, and R1 needs substantial/maximum assistance for toilet transfer. R1's most current Care Plan documents R1 has an ADL self-care performance deficit related to Alzheimer's, impaired balance, and limited mobility (initiated on 10/23/24, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a medical provider of abnormal vital signs for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for change in condition in a sample of 6.Findings include:R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 3/19/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and anxiety disorder. R1's 5/8/26 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating R1 was severely cognitively impaired.R1's 5/19/26 at 12:30 AM progress noted authored by V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) documented in part . BP (Blood Pressure) 89/82, P (Pulse) 45, R (Respirations) 20, T (Temperature) 102.3 (degrees Fahrenheit), O2 (Oxygen Saturation) 90 (90%) . Sweating, shallow breathing, bilat (bilateral) arm tremors noted. Pupils equal reactive to light and accommodation. Minimal repose when addressing, no words given, only audible gasps made. Tylenol 500 mg given, fluids encouraged.R1's 5/19/26 at 6:12 AM progress note documented in part .: BP 113/84, P 62, R 17, T 98.1, O2 93. Sweating, shallow breathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interventions, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate incontinence care and oral care to 3 (R1, R2, R3) of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) in a sample of 4. Findings include:.1. R2's admission Record documents an admission date of 2/26/2022 and includes diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis, local Infections of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Paralytic Syndrome following Cerebrovascular Disease, Convulsions, Major Depressive Disorder, and Dysphagia. R2s Physician Order sheet documents R2 was placed on hospice on 2/27/26.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] includes a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 suggesting moderate cognition impairment. Section GG documents R2 is dependent for all activities of daily living including oral care. Section H- Bladder and Bowel documents R2 has an ileostomy, and is always incontinent of bowel, and urinary continence is not rated. R2's Care Plan documents R2 has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure authorized licensed personnel administered medications and failed to ensure accurate documentation of the personnel administering the medications. This failure has the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: On 1/16/26 at 11:16 AM, V1 (Administrator) presented surveillance footage from the night of 1/15/26 from 8:00 PM through 9:20 PM. In the footage V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) is observed pulling the keys to the medication cart and the medication room out of her pocket, opening the medication cart, popping medications into medication cups, taking the medication cups to resident rooms for administration, and opening the medication room door without a nurse present. V5 is observed to be documenting medications administered on a facility laptop computer. V1 said V5 did not have a log in for the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) and was unsure how V5 was documenting the medications.On 1/16/26 at 12:24 PM, V1 presented video surveillance footage of 1/15/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to only permit authorized individuals access to drugs, biologicals, and controlled Schedule II drugs. This failure has the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:On 1/16/26 at 11:16 AM, V1 (Administrator) presented surveillance footage from the night of 1/15/26 from 8:00 PM through 9:20 PM. In the footage V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) is observed pulling the keys to the medication cart and the medication room out of her pocket, opening the medication cart, popping medications into medication cups, taking the medication cups to resident rooms for administration, opening the schedule II controlled medication box, popping schedule II medications into medication cups, signing out schedule II medications in the schedule II count binder, and opening the medication room door without a nurse present.On 1/16/26 at 12:24 PM, V1 presented video surveillance footage of 1/15/26 with the time stamps as follows: 9:04 PM showing V5 taking a cup of medications to R1's room, 9:11 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-27 · tag F0839 — widespread
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure employees working as a licensed staff member had an active professional license. This failure has the potential to affect all 91 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:On 1/16/26 at 11:16 AM, V1 (Administrator) presented surveillance footage from the night of 1/15/26 from 8:00 PM through 9:20 PM. In the footage V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) is observed pulling the keys to the medication cart and the medication room out of her pocket, opening the medication cart, popping medications into medication cups, taking the medication cups to resident rooms for administration, opening the schedule II controlled medication box, popping schedule II medications into medication cups, signing out schedule II medications in the schedule II count binder, and opening the medication room door without a nurse present.On 1/16/26 at 12:24 PM, V1 presented video surveillance footage of 1/15/26 with the time stamps as follows: 9:04 PM showing V5 taking a cup of medications to R1's room, 9:11 PM V5 taking a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain safe water temperatures for 3 residents of 12 (R10, R11, R12) reviewed for water temperatures in the sample of 12. This failure has the potential to affect 45 confused and ambulatory residents of the 90 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:On 1/20/26 at 1:35 PM, a digital metal stemmed thermometer used for taking temperatures for this survey was checked for accuracy using the ice-point method and was accurate within +/- 2 degrees Fahrenheit.On 1/20/26 at 1:50 PM, the hot water temperature taken with a calibrated digital metal stemmed thermometer was taken at the hand sink of the A hall shower room registered 121.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F). At that time the A hall hot water heater mixing valve was set at 104 degrees Fahrenheit.On 1/20/26 at 2:18 PM, the hot water temperature taken with a calibrated digital metal stemmed thermometer was taken at the hand sink of the 200-hall shower room registered 128.0 degrees F and slowly dropped below 110 degrees F after approximately one minute. At that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-11-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain the kitchen free from roaches. This failure has the potential to affect all 94 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:On 11/18/25 at 10:25 AM, a cockroach was crawling across the back of the hand washing sink in the kitchen.On 11/18/25 at 10:33 AM, a cockroach was crawling along the wall under the 3-compartment sink in the kitchen.On 11/18/25 at 11:28 AM, two cockroaches were crawling along the wall next to the three-compartment sink in the kitchen.On 11/18/25 at 10:28 AM, V3 (Cook) said the kitchen had a lot of cockroaches and had been trying to get rid of them since V3 started in January of 2025. V3 said a pest control company would come to the facility once a month and the cockroach problem would get better, but they would slowly return. V3 said staff tried to keep the kitchen as clean as possible to decrease the cockroach population.On 11/18/25 at 3:50 PM, V4 (Chief Executive Officer) said the dietary manager should have told us there were roaches in the kitchen and he would have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure life sustaining measures were initiated to 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) in a sample of 6. The findings include: R1's admission Record documents an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including Encounter for Palliative Care, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Anxiety, Major Depressive Disorder. Special instruction document Residential Hospice of Southern Illinois. R1's Hospice Initial Plan of Care dated [DATE] documents a start of care date of [DATE] with a Terminal Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). This same document is marked yes under the category of DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). R1's facility Care Plan documents a Focus area of R1's wish is to be resuscitated and CPR to be initiated if his heart stops with an initiation date of [DATE]. Interventions documented include: all staff should perform Heimlich maneuver if choking and proceed with CPR,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices while providing incontinence care and handling contaminated linens for 2 (R19 and R23) of 8 residents reviewed for incontinence and contact precautions. Findings include: 1. R19's admission Record documented an admission date of 6/3/2021 and included diagnoses of methicillin staphylococcus aureus infections as the cause of the diseases classified elsewhere, osteomyelitis unspecified, vasculitis limited to the skin unspecified, and major depressive disorder, single episode, unspecified. R19's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R19 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R19 is cognitively intact. R19's MDS Section for Functional Abilities and Goals documented impairment under range of motion in her lower extremities on both sides. R19's MDS Section for Active Diagnoses documented R19 having an Infection of a Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient staff to provide timely care and assistance to its residents. This has the potential to affect all 91 residents who currently reside at the facility. Findings Include: The facility Daily Census Report dated 3/6/25 documents 91 residents reside at the facility. 1. R2's admission Record with a print date of 3/6/25 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diabetes, heart disease, and muscle weakness. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/22/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. R2's current Care Plan with a Focus area of, (R2) has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Activity Intolerance, Impaired balance, Limited ROM (Range of Motion) Date Initiated: 10/28/2024. This Focus area include interventions of, Bathing/Showering: (R2) requires extensive assistance by x1 (times 1)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure showers were provided and residents received timely toileting assistance 4 of 6 residents (R2, R3, R12, and R14) reviewed for showers in the sample of 14. Findings Include: 1. R2's admission Record with a print date of 3/6/25 documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diabetes, heart disease, and muscle weakness. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/22/25 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, which indicates R2 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R2 requires partial to moderate assistance of staff for toilet transfers. R2's current Care Plan with a Focus area of, (R2) has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Activity Intolerance, Impaired balance, Limited ROM (Range of Motion) Date Initiated: 10/28/2024. This Focus area include interventions of, Bathing/Showering: (R2) requires extensive assistance by x1 (times 1) staff with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported timely to the Administrator and to the State Survey Agency for 2 of 3 (R1 and R13) residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 14. Findings Include. 1. R1's admission Record with a print date of 3/6/25 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include multiple fractures, osteoarthritis, and hypertension. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/5/25 documents R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates R1 is cognitively intact. On 3/5/25 at 11:45 AM, R1 stated V13 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) came in his room talking louder than normal and handed him about 16 pills in one cup. R1 stated he sat the pills down and asked for a list of his medications and V13 stated she didn't have time to get him the list and walked around to the other side of his bed. R1 stated V13 picked up his left hand and started to do an accu check. R1 stated he gave V13 his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated and residents were protected from possible further abuse for 2 of 3 (R1 and R13) residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 14. Findings Include. 1. R1's admission Record with a print date of 3/6/25 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include multiple fractures, osteoarthritis, and hypertension. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/5/25 documents R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates R1 is cognitively intact. R1's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of (R1) has potential for a behavior problem R/T (related to) making false allegations toward staff of assault during routine cares, or bullying, yelling, being belligerent, not cooperative with care at times. Date Initiated: 03/05/2025. The interventions included for this Focus area include, Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to notify a family member and physician of a change in condition due to injuries of 2 of 4 resident (R1 and R2) in the sample of 11. Findings include: R2's admission Record includes admission date of 9/11/2024 and diagnoses of ST Elevation (Stemi) Myocardial Infarction, Pneumonitis, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Aortocoronary Bypass Graft, Dependence of Supplemental Oxygen. R2's Responsible party was listed as V30 (family member). R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/18/2024 includes a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section GG Functional Abilities and Goals document R2 requires partial/moderate assistance with toileting, shower, upper body dressing and lower body dressing. R2 requires supervision/or touching assistance with car transfer, walking 10 feet, 50 feet, and 150 feet, transferring to toilet, sit to stand. R2's current Care plan documents R2 is a potential risk for falls and injury. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure completely trained, qualified Certified Nurse Aide staff were present to provide routine care and meet residents' needs, including safe transfer/ambulation assistance for 1 of 3 (R2) residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 7. Findings include: R2's admission Record documents admission date of 8/2/2023 including diagnoses of Muscle weakness, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, Cerebral Infarct followed by aphasia, dysphagia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and Alzheimer. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 24th, 2024, includes BIMS (Basic Interview for Mental Status) score of 4 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section GG indicates R2 is a set up for eating, partial/moderate assistance is needed for toileting, bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. R2 requires supervision or touching assistance with ambulation. R2's Care plan includes a focus date 3/14/2024, that documents R2 requires restorative nursing for ambulation to maintain or increase current level of function related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer to prevent falls for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 7. This past non-compliance occurred between 7/25/24 and 8/9/24. The findings include: R3's admission Record documents that R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The same admission Record also documents some of R3's diagnoses as repeated falls, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis or left posterior cerebral artery, difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified. R3's care plan notes a focus area of R3 has a potential for falls and injury, non-ambulatory, history of falls, requires assist with all ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). One of the interventions listed is mechanical lift with assist of 2 as needed for transfers. R3's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/3/24 documents R3 is dependent for transfers which indicates the helper does all the effort, resident does none of the effort to complete the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately label resident's insulin and eye drops with date of opening and failed to maintain security of controlled medications for 4 of 12 residents (R16, R24, R62, and R64) reviewed for medication labeling and storage in a sample of 39. Findings including: 1. R16's face sheet documented an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including: aphasia, muscle weakness, other symbolic dysfunctions, history of falling. R16's Order Summary Report documented a [DATE] order for basaglar kwikpen subcutaneous solution inject 7 units subcutaneously one time a day. On [DATE] at 12:22 PM, R16's basaglar kwikpen was in the medication cart with the seal broken and was not dated with an open date. V21 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) verified R16's basaglar kwikpen did not have an open date was not sure when it was opened. V21 stated R16's undated basaglar kwikpen would be disposed of and a new one would be obtained per the facility policy. 2. R24's face…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess a resident's skin on admission for 1 of 5 residents (R4) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a sample of 39 residents. Findings include: 1. R4's face sheet documented an admission of 4/1/24 with diagnoses including: osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of sacral region, obesity, heart failure, multiple sclerosis, urinary incontinence. R4's 4/1/24 Nursing admission Screening/History documented no pressure ulcers on R4's right lower extremity. R4's 4/1/24 Wound - Weekly Observation Tool documented no pressure ulcers on R4's right lower extremity. R4's 4/3/24 Treatment Nurse Weekly Note documented no pressure ulcers on R4's right lower extremity. R4's 4/2/24 Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk documented a score of 9, indicating R4 was at very high risk of developing pressure ulcers. R4's Medication Review Report on or After Date: 4/2/24 documented a 4/2/24 order .Walking boot to Left ankle (at) all times for stabilization/ protection. (Nondisplaced impacted commuted left distal (tibia fibula) fracture…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to assess residents for smoking safety to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 3 residents (R44, R27) reviewed for smoking in the sample of 39. The findings include: 1. R44's admission Record notes that R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R44's admission record documents R44's diagnoses in part as Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, epilepsy, bipolar disorder, and encounter for palliative care. R44's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/15/24 document that R44 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of mental status) of 14 which indicates R44 is cognitively intact. R44's current care plan notes R44 is a smoker. R44's interventions listed: resident can smoke unsupervised, initiated on 10/11/21. Resident is able to smoke unsupervised and hold onto own smoking materials, initiated 10/11/21. Observe clothing and skin for signs of cigarette burns. There were no smoking assessments located in R44's Clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide urinary catheter care per current standards of practice for 1 of 4 residents (R18) reviewed for urinary catheters in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R18's face sheet documented an admission date of 6/27/16 with diagnoses including: hypothyroidism, aphasia, dementia, retention of urine, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia. R18's Order Summary Report documented a 5/10/24 order for catheter care every shift and as needed. On 5/30/24 at 9:29 AM, V33 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) preformed urinary catheter care for R18. V33 removed R18's incontinence brief which was soiled with feces. V33 cleaned feces from R18's scrotum and groin folds from front to back with wipes. V33 assisted R18 to turn in the bed and cleaned the feces from R18's gluteal cleft from front to back with wipes and removed R18's soiled incontinence brief. Without changing gloves or performing hand hygiene, V33 used a wipe to clean R18's penis with strokes away from R18's body. V33 pinched R18's urinary catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medication in the form recommended by the pharmacy for 1 of 12 residents (R20) reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R20's face sheet documented an admission date of 6/12/23 with diagnoses including: unspecified dementia, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, essential (primary) hypertension. R20's 5/31/24 Order Summary Report documented a 6/12/23 order for nifedipine ER (Extended Release) oral tablet extended release 24-hour 30 mg (milligram) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential (primary) hypertension. On 5/28/24 at 12:11 PM, V21 (Licensed Practical Nurse/ LPN) was administering R20's medications. V21 placed R20's nifedipine ER tablet in a medication crushing bag and crushed R20 nifedipine ER tablet. V21 placed R20's crushed nifedipine ER in applesauce and administered R20's nifedipine. On 5/31/24 at 3:12 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/ DON) stated she expected staff would not crush an extended release medication per the pharmacy's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide wound care per current standards of practice for 3 of 5 residents (R4, R6, and R55) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a sample of 39 residents. Findings include: 1. R4's face sheet documented an admission of 4/1/24 with diagnoses including: osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of sacral region, obesity, heart failure, multiple sclerosis, urinary incontinence. R4's Order Summary Report documented the following orders: 5/22/24 Pressure area to Left Medial Ankle with n/s, apply Santyl Ointment to wound bed cover with Adaptic and cover with dry gauze and cover loosely with roll gauze drsg (dressing). Change daily and as needed. 5/22/24 Pressure to Left Medial Calcaneus (Heel), cleanse with n/s, apply Santyl Ointment to wound bed, apply Adaptic and then apply dry gauze and cover loosely with roll gauze drsg. Change daily and as needed. 5/22/24 Pressure to Left Medial Foot, cleanse with n/s apply Santyl to wound bed, apply Adaptic and cover…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1.) offer pneumococcal vaccinations for 2 of 5 residents (R18 and R12) reviewed for immunization in a sample of 39; and 2.) update the facility's Pneumonia Vaccine policy and to include Vaccination Timing for Adults following the most recent recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This has the potential to affect any residents eligible to receive the Pneumococcal vaccines. Findings include: 1. R18's Face Sheet documents a birthdate indicating that R18 is [AGE] years of age and documents an admission date of 06/27/16. R18's Face Sheet documents diagnoses including major depressive disorder, hypothyroidism, essential hypertension, dementia, pancytopenia, and alcoholic cirrhosis of liver without ascites. R18's Immunization Report with a date range of 05/01/15 - 05/31/24 documents that R18 received Prevnar 13 vaccination (Pneumococcal 13-Valent Conjugate/PCV13) on 08/08/17. R18's Immunization Report does not document any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-31 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer the updated (2023-2024 Formula) COVID-19 vaccine to 3 of 5 residents (R18, R67 and R36) reviewed for immunizations in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R18's Face Sheet documents a birthdate indicating that R18 is [AGE] years of age and documents an admission date of 06/27/16. R18's Face Sheet documents diagnoses including: Major Depressive Disorder, Hypothyroidism, Essential Hypertension, Dementia, Pancytopenia, and Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver without Ascites. R18's Immunization Report with a date range of 05/01/15 - 05/31/24 documents: R18 was administered the COVID-19 vaccine on the following dates: 01/12/21, 02/02/21, 11/02/21 and 06/08/22. There is no order in R18's medical record for the updated (2023-2024 Formula) COVID-19 vaccine or documentation that it was administered. 2. R36's Face Sheet documents and admission date of 04/04/24 and a date of birth indicating R36 is [AGE] years of age. R36's Face Sheet documents diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-14 · tag F0620 — widespread
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement resident admission contracts free of requiring residents to waive their right to hold the facility responsible for losses of personal property. This has the potential to affects all 74 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Contract Between Resident and (facility) documented in part .XII. Facility Rights and Obligations: .Facility and/or its employees shall not be held responsible for damages or loss of the Resident's personal property . On 4/7/23 at 10:49 AM, V4 (Marketing Director) said all residents or the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) must sign the Contract Between Resident and (facility) to be admitted to the facility. V4 said she or the Social Services Director will go through the contract with the resident or resident's POA. V4 said the part XII. Facility Rights and Obligations of the contract meant the facility was not responsible for keeping track of resident's personal property at all times and the facility was not responsible for reimbursing residents for any lost…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide 8 hours of daily Registered Nurse coverage. This failure has the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 04/7/23 at 10:20 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) acknowledged there are days that the facility does not have Registered Nurse (RN) coverage, and on those days, she is on call. V2 stated that the facility has two Registered Nurses employed at the facility, herself and V16 (RN). V2 verified the accuracy of nursing schedules provided and stated the facility does not have any nursing waivers. Review of the Nursing Schedules from 1/1/23 - current documents no RN coverage was provided at the facility on the following dates: 1/1/23, 1/7/23, 1/8/23, 1/14/23, 1/15/23, 1/21/23, 1/22/23, 1/28/23, 1/29/23, 2/4/23, 2/5/23, 2/12/23, 2/13/23, 2/19/23, 2/25/23, 2/26/23, 3/4/23, 3/5/23, 3/11/23, 3/12/23, 3/18/23, 3/19/23, 3/25/23, 3/26/23, 4/1/23, 4/2/23, 4/8/23, and 4/9/23. The resident census and conditions list provided by the facility on 4/4/74 documents 74 residents reside at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-14 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately report Registered Nurse hours to the payroll-based journal. This has the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Fiscal Year Quarter 1 2023 (October 1-December 31) payroll-based journal report documents that the facility reported adequate Registered Nurse hours. On 4/7/23 at 10:00 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that she does not have an RN that works weekends and hasn't had one for the last year. V2 stated they are actively looking for more to hire but have not had any applicants. V2 stated she is available by phone, as is V16 (RN) who is a PRN (as needed) facility nurse. On 04/7/23 at 11:43 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated that he adds in the hours of the Hospice Nurse and Certified Nurse Instructor (CNA) instructor as Registered Nurse (RN) hours and that V2 (Registered Nurse) is always available by phone. The nursing schedules during this time reflect that no RN was scheduled to work in the facility on the following days: 10/1/22, 10/2/22, 10/8/22, 10/9/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide hot/comfortable water temperatures in resident rooms and shower rooms and failed to empty bedside commodes of feces in a timely manner for 67 of 77 residents (R1, R3, R4, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R14, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22, R23, R24, R25, R26, R27, R28, R30, R31, R32, R33, R34, R35, R36, R37, R38, R39, R41, R42, R44, R45, R46, R48, R49, R50, R51, R52, R53, R54, R55, R56, R57, R58, R59, R61, R62, R63, R64, R65, R66, R67, R68, R69, R70, R71, R72, R73, R128, R278, R279, and R280) reviewed for environment in the sample of 77. Findings include: 1. R23's face sheet documented an admission date of 4/1/15 and documented diagnoses including pancytopenia, major depressive disorder, gout, and constipation. R23's 1/29/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating R23 was cognitively intact. On 4/4/23 at 10:05 AM, R23 was lying in bed with two areas of dried feces on his blanket and a bedside commode sitting next to bed with feces in it. R23's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-14 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer 1 of 1 resident (R26) for a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) level II screening after receiving a new mental health diagnosis review in a sample of 77. Findings include: R26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with primary diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, Anxiety, and Major Depressive Disorder according to her facility diagnoses sheet. R26's OBRA I (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) dated 10/26/17 indicates she is appropriate for nursing services at this time. On 02/05/20, R26 was subsequently diagnosed with hallucinations and a psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition. On 04/05/23 at 2:00 PM, when asked for R26's referral for a PASARR II (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review), V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) stated social services usually does those and she is out of the facility this week but was able to confirm R26 did not have a referral for a PASARR II screening. On 04/11/23 at 10:55 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to complete serial neurologic checks after an unwitnessed fall and have fall interventions in place for 2 of 9 residents (R22 and R40) reviewed for falls out of a sample of 77. Findings include: 1. R40's face sheet documented an admission date of 1/14/20 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, dementia, and repeated falls. R40's Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating unable to complete. R40's Morse Fall Scale assessment dated [DATE] documented R40 was a high risk for falls. R40's Fall Investigation dated 3/6/23 documented R40 had an unwitnessed fall and was found on the floor in her room at 12:55 AM. R40's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented neurological checks were performed on 3/6/23 at 2:40 AM, 3:41 AM, 4:40 AM, 5:40 AM, 9:47 AM, 1:42 PM, 5:40 PM, and 9:40 PM. The facility's undated Neuro (Neurological) Check Protocol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,170 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $12,761 — penalty dated 2024-09-13
  • $7,409 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-09 for 8 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BELL, SHELLYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF6%since 01/01/1995
PARKER, JANEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF81%since 01/01/1975
THOMPSON, JEFFIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF6%since 01/01/1995
THOMPSON, SAMUELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF6%since 08/01/1995
DAUBERT, MARYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2024
WRIGHT, ALEXIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-13.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 47%Medicare 8%Other / private 46%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$281per resident / day
operating cost
$8,539per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$248per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145386. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next