Piatt County Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 85.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.95 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.43 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to report repetitive instances of verbal and physical abuse of a resident (R45) by V13 Certified Nurse's Assistant and failed to report a resident to resident physical altercation to the facility's Administrator. These failures resulted in V13 having continued access to R45 in which V13 provided direct cares and in the further instances of verbal and physical abuse of R45 by V13. As a result of this abuse R45's hands and chest were bruised and R45 displayed emotional symptoms of residual harm as evidenced by flinching(making sudden startled movements) and increased behaviors with cares. These failures affected three (R45, R35, and R69) of six residents reviewed for abuse on the sample list of 47. This failure has the potential to affect all 24 residents (R66, R77, R70, R3, R47, R55, R20, R74, R9, R59, R76, R45, R62, R79, R19, R8, R35, R10, R69, R61, R5, R65, R36, and R32) residing on the Dementia unit. These Failures resulted in an immediate jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 1/9/24 when V16 Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from physical and verbal abuse by staff. R45, who resides on the dementia unit, was subjected to physical and verbal abuse on three separate occasions by V13 Certified Nurse's Assistant. R45's hands and chest were bruised, R45 was fearful showing emotional symptoms following the incidents as evidenced by increased behaviors with cares, making more sudden abrupt startled movements when approached by caregivers. These failures affect one (R45) of six residents reviewed for abuse on the sample list of 47. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 1/9/24 when V13 Certified Nurse's Assistant verbally abused R45 during a shower, V13 was suspended from work 3/13/24. V1 Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 4/4/24 at 10:00 AM. The surveyor confirmed by interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 4/4/24, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent an injury by failing to ensure a bed was in a low position for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for falls on the sample list of three. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a laceration to the right forearm, a hematoma, and spinal fracture which required emergency medical treatment. Findings include: The facility's Managing Falls and Fall Risk Policy with a revision date of 12/2021 documents that staff will identify and implement relevant interventions to try to minimize serious consequences of falling. R1's Care Plan initiated on 9/3/2019 documents that R1 was at risk for injury related to mobility status. This Care Plan documents that R1 has a history of skin tears, bruises, and a history of falls. This Care Plan documents an intervention for the bed to be in the lowest, most appropriate position when resident is resting in bed. R1's Incident report dated 4/14/2025 documents R1 was found on the floor next to the bed at 10:40 PM by V9,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe and effective supervision during a total body mechanical lift transfer to prevent a traumatic fall. This failure resulted in R1 falling from R1's transfer sling, striking R1's head on an adjacent bedside table, and landing on the floor, resulting in a collarbone fracture and scalp laceration requiring emergency medical treatment at the hospital. R1 is one of three residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of three. Findings include: R1's medical diagnosis list dated 2/6/25 documents R1's diagnoses include: Neuropathy, Left Knee Pain, Hyperlipidemia, Arthritis, Anxiety, and Depression. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 has severely impaired cognition and is totally dependent on staff for transfers. On 2/10/2025 at 09:50 AM, V4 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and V5 Certified Nursing Assistant reported R1's transfer is supposed to be completed by two staff members using the total body mechanical lift. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-05-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly perform and complete catheter care, and maintain urinary drainage collection chambers off of the floor. The facility also failed to treat and complete physician ordered recommendations after the development of a penile wound for two of three residents (R53 and R52) reviewed for indwelling catheter use on the total sample list of 39. This failure resulted in R53's penile wound worsening and becoming split from the urethral opening to the scrotal sac area. Findings include: 1) R53's medical record documents the following diagnosis: Retention of Urine, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia without lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. On 5/8/23 at 1:26 PM R53's urinary drainage collection chamber bag was laying on the floor at the end of the bed. R53's medical record did not contain a comprehensive care plan for the use of an indwelling urinary drainage device or a comprehensive care plan after the development of the wound to R53's penis. R53's medical record documents on 2/8/23, (V10 Wound Physician) here on 2/6/23 to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-05-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify significant weight loss, notify the physician and Registered Dietitian, implement nutritional interventions, complete nutritional assessments, and record nutritional supplement intake for two (R13, R16) of four residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 39. These failures resulted in R13 experiencing an additional significant weight loss of 6.65 % in one month. Findings include: The facility's Impaired Nutrition/Unplanned Weight Loss Clinical Protocol revised October 2020 documents the nursing department are responsible for monitoring resident weights. Significant weight loss is identified as a loss of at least 5% in one month, 7.5 % in 3 months, and 10 % in 6 months. The physician will review possible causes of weight loss. Interventions will be implemented to address weight loss. The Dietitian and Physician will determine the resident's diet including if nutritional supplements need to be added. Monitoring weight…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level required more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label insulin, eye drops, and nose spray containers with the date opened for three of eighteen residents (R24, R33, R46) reviewed for medication administration on a sample list of 39. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to discard expired insulin for two of eighteen residents (R3, R68) reviewed for medication administration on a sample list of 39. Findings include: a. The facility's Storage of Medications Policy dated 2023 documents that all injectable medications, eye drops, nose spray, ear drops, liquid medications shall be labeled with date upon opening containers. R24's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated [DATE] documents R24 is receiving Fluticasone Propionate nose spray. R33's MAR dated [DATE] documents R33 is receiving Dorzolamide HCl-Timolol eye drops. R46's MAR dated [DATE] documents R46 is receiving Lantus…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to use required personal protective equipment during the transfer of a resident on contact isolation and failed to prevented cross contamination during incontinence care and urinary catheter care for three of four residents (R26, R68, R76) reviewed for infection control on the sample list of 39. Findings Include: 1. R26's Physician Order dated June 2025 documents R26 is to be on contact isolation related to Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) of the foot. On 6/17/25 at 8:45 AM V8 Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) and V18 CNA transferred R26 using a full mechanical lift. R26 was on contact isolation for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) of the right foot. Neither V8 nor V18 wore gowns during the transfer. On 6/17/25 at 9:00 AM V2 Director of Nurses confirmed R26 is on contact isolation related to MRSA of his foot and both V8 and V18 should have been wearing both gloves and gowns during the transfer. The undated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain dignified quality of life for one of one resident (R68) reviewed for dignity on the sample list of 39. Findings Include: The facility's Quality of Life - Dignity policy revised in 2024 documents each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect, and individuality. Staff should always treat resident with respect and dignity. Treating with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff should promote dignity and assist residents as needed by promptly responding to a resident's request for toileting assistance (incontinence care). R68's Medical Diagnoses List dated June 2025 documents R68 is diagnosed with Diarrhea, Legal Blindness, Age-related physical debility, and Depression. R68's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R68…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain call lights within reach for one of one resident (R68) reviewed for call lights on the sample list of 39. Findings Include: The facility's Call Light Policy dated October 2010 documents when residents are in bed or confined to a chair staff are to make sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. R68's Medical Diagnoses List dated June 2025 documents R68 is diagnosed with Diarrhea, Legal Blindness, Age-related physical debility, and Depression. R68's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R68 has some cognitive impairment, uses a wheelchair, is always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and is dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and transfers. R68's Care Plan dated 9/25/24 documents R68 is at risk for skin breakdown, is legally blind, and staff are to place the call light within easy reach, place frequently used personal items within easy reach and respond to requests for assistance promptly. R68 is at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a notice of bed hold to a resident being discharged to a local hospital. This failure affects one resident (R11) out of one reviewed for hospitalization on the sample list of 39. Findings include: R11's Census Detail dated 6/18/25 documents R11 was hospitalized starting on 8/20/24 through 8/26/24. R11's comprehensive Electronic Medical Record did not contain a notice of bed hold provided to R11. On 6/17/25 at 9:17 AM, R11 stated she had been to the hospital several times for various reasons. R11 further stated she did not remember anyone telling her anything about being able to come back to the facility nor that the facility would hold a bed for her. R11's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R11 received a score of 15 out of a possible 15 during a Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating R11 is cognitively intact and without memory recall problems. On 6/17/25 at 3:50 PM, V3, Administrative Assistant, stated there was not a bed hold…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit minimum data set resident assessments for significant change in status, and discharge, in the required time frame. These failures affect one resident (R5) out of one reviewed for minimum data set transmissions on the sample list of 39. Findings include: R5's Minimum Data Set for significant change in status dated as completed 5/16/25 did not document any transmitted or accepted date. R5's Minimum Data Set for discharge with return anticipated, likewise dated as completed 5/16/25, did not document any transmitted or accepted date. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual dated October 2024 documents these minimum data sets for R5 are required to be transmitted within 14 days of the completion date. On 6/17/25 at 1:58 PM, V5, Minimum Data Set Assistant, stated he was not sure about the timing requirements for the Minimum Data Sets as he was new to his position. On 6/17/25 at 2:00 PM, V19, Dementia Unit Coordinator/ Dementia Unit Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and maintain Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) required twelve hours of inservice training per year to ensure continued competence. This failure has the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility on the sample list of 47. Findings include: V20's training record documents, V20's Continuing Education Hours completed for 2023 total 7.00 hours. V27's training record documents, V27's Continuing Education Hours completed for 2023 total 11.50 hours. V28's training record documents, V28's Continuing Education Hours completed for 2023 total 11.50 hours. On 4/04/24 at 10:15 AM, V2 Director of Nursing states V2 is aware of the required Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) requirement of 12 hours of annual education. V2 indicates V15, Wound Nurse, is responsible for monitoring CNA education and informing those CNA's that are in need of completing education hours. V2 acknowledges V2 and V15 are aware that several CNA's do not have the required 12 continuing education hours for 2023. V2 confirmed V20, V27, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow it's abuse prohibition policy by failing to report allegations of abuse to the facility Administrator and prevent further resident abuse. These failures affected three (R45, R35, and R69) of six residents reviewed for abuse on the sample list of 47. These failures have the potential to affect all 24 residents (R66, R77, R70, R3, R47, R55, R20, R74, R9, R59, R76, R45, R62, R79, R19, R8, R35, R10, R69, R61, R5, R65, R36, and R32) residing on the Dementia unit. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prohibition policy dated 8/22/16 documents all residents have the right to be free from verbal and physical abuse. This policy documents the definition of physical abuse as, the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means. This policy documents the definition of verbal abuse as, the use by an employee or agent of oral, written or gestured language that includes disparaging and derogatory terms to a resident or within his or her hearing or seeing distance, regardless of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one (R57) of four residents reviewed for dignity in a sample list of 47 residents. Findings include: R57's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R57 as cognitively intact. R57's Final Incident Report to the State Agency dated 4/3/24 documents R57 reported V19 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) used the 'F' (expletive) word and it is offensive to women. On 4/1/24 at 10:00 AM, R57 stated, There is a male CNA (V19) that comes in my room and uses the 'F' (expletive) word like it is okay to say that. (V19) always brings in another female CNA in with him. (V19) says things like 'F* (expletive) this and f* (expletive) that' when he talks to the other CNA and when he talks to me. It is very disrespectful. First of all, I do not require two CNA's to help me with anything. Second of all, I do not allow the use of the 'F' (expletive) word from anyone. I have told (V19) not to say that but he continually does. On 4/3/24 at 10:30 AM, V1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide access to a hand washing sink for two residents (R21, R12) of 18 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample list of 47. Findings Include: 1. R21's electronic health record diagnosis list, printed on 4/3/24 at 3:05 PM, documents the following diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, History of Falling, Right Knee Pain, Abnormal Gait and Mobility, Unsteadiness on Feet, Neuropathy, Muscle Weakness, and Anxiety Disorder. R21's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R21 is cognitively intact and uses a wheelchair for mobility. On 4/2/24 at 4:00 PM, R21 stated I have to use the sit-to-stand lift to go to the toilet and it's tight in there, but we manage. I'd really like to use the sink to wash my hands and face, comb my hair and brush my teeth, I can't get my wheelchair anywhere close to the sink. I like to do as much as I can for myself. The sink is observed to be between a wall and a cabinet and does not have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$182,948 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $14,505 — penalty dated 2025-05-05
• $12,425 — penalty dated 2025-02-10
• $156,018 — penalty dated 2024-04-09
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-23 for 39 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL