Axiom Gardens of Mount Vernon
#5 Doctors Park Rd, Mount Vernon, IL 62864 · For profit - Corporation · 106 certified beds · (618) 242-1064 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (18) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $63,330 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-04)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 39.3% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 22.5% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 38.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 26.7% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 50.0% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective pain management and treatment was provided in a timely manner for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for pain management in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in R1, who was admitted to the facility with a right femur fracture, and displaced trimalleolar and bimalleolar fractures of the right lower leg, experiencing prolonged, significant pain due to necessary pain medication not being available.The findings include:R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 02/14/26 and included diagnoses of fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, cellulitis of right lower limb, displaced Tri malleolar fracture of right lower leg, displaced bimalleolar fracture of right lower leg and end stage renal disease. R1's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1's short term memory was ok and cognitive skills for daily decision making regarding tasks of daily life was marked as independent. In the Functional Abilities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident to resident physical abuse for 2 of 4 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a nasal fracture during and altercation with R2. R1's admission Record documents an admission date of 7/2/2025 and includes diagnoses of Encephalopathy, Unspecified Dementia with other behavioral disturbances, unspecified dementia with agitation, and convulsions.R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/11/2025 includes a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 2 suggesting R1 has severe cognition impairment. Section E-Behaviors documents R1 does not hallucinations or delusions. R1 has no behaviors of wandering. Section GG -Functional Abilities documents R1 has no impairment with upper or lower extremities. R1's care plan documents a focus area of: R1 is at risk for abuse with date initiated 7/3/25. Goal: R1 will remain free of abuse, mistreatment or otherwise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide enough staff to supervise and attend to the needs of the residents in a timely manner. This failure has the potential to affect all 70 residents that reside in the facility.Findings include: 1. R53's admission record documents an admission date of 9/15/2025 with the following diagnoses in part; Cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of right middle cerebral artery, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, age-related physical debility. R53's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating that R53 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents R53 has an impairment of lower extremities on both sides, requires substantial to maximum assistance with transfers. R53's MDS documents R53 requires supervision or touching assistance with eating. R53's care plan documents that he requires supervision with meal consumption and has an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to answer call lights for residents needing assistance in a timely manner to promote dignity for 1 residents of 9 residents (R68) reviewed for call light response in a sample of 51. The findings include: R68's admission Record documents an admission date of 3/13/26 and a discharge date of 3/18/26, with the following diagnoses in part; cerebral atherosclerosis, blindness in right eye category 5, blindness in left eye category 5.R68's Minimum Data Set (MDS) was incomplete due to being a new admission.R68's care plan documents that she is at high risk for falls intervention to include anticipate and meet her needs, be sure her call light in within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed, be aware of blindness.03/16/2026 at 10:01AM R68's call light was observed on. V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) responded promptly. V12 (Family Member) stated to V9 that R68 needed to use the restroom. V9 stated that she was the only one on the hall, R68 was a two assist and it would be a minute. V9 shut the call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and provide necessary controlled prescription pain medication in a timely manner for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 5.The findings include:R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 02/14/26 and included diagnoses of fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, displaced Tri malleolar and bimalleolar fractures of right lower leg, cellulitis of right lower limb, and end stage renal disease. R1's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1's short term memory was ok and cognitive skills for daily decision making regarding tasks of daily life was marked as independent. In the Functional Abilities and Goals section, this MDS documented R1 was dependent for toileting, rolling left to right, sitting to lying, lying to sitting on side of bed, sit to stand, chair/bed-to chair transfer, toilet transfers, and tub/shower transfers. In the section titled Health Conditions, R1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident to resident physical abuse for 2 (R3 and R4) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. Findings Include: R3's admission Record documented R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and included diagnoses of unspecified dementia, essential hypertension, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis of knee, adult failure to thrive, and unspecified macular degeneration. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented that R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating R3 is moderately impaired. R3's Care Plan with a date of 05/01/2025 included a focus area of I have a behavior problem (Physical altercation with roommate.) The interventions listed are administer meds as ordered, anticipate and meet residents needs, arrange placement with compatible roommate, and monitor for evidence of agitation. R4's admission Record documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to follow current CDC (Center for Disease Control) guidelines for proper PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) use and failed to effectively sanitize floors during COVID outbreak. This has the potential to affect all 53 residents living in the facility. The Findings Include: 1. On 3/27/25 at 11:00 am, V14 (Housekeeping Supervisor) said they use (Brand Cleaner) Lavender all purpose neutral cleaner when they mopped the floor currently and during the COVID outbreak. V14 said she is unsure if it kills COVID or not. On 3/26/25 at 2:30pm, V12 (Housekeeping) said there was cleaner in her mop water as she was moping. V12 said it is (Brand Cleaner) Lavender All Purpose Neutral Cleaner. V12 said she doesn't know if it kills COVID or not. On 3/27/25 at 10:37 am, V16 (floor cleaner manufacturer representative) said that (Brand Cleaner) Lavender All Purpose Neutral Floor Cleaner has zero kill time for COVID. V16 said it is just a multi purpose floor cleaner and does not kill COVID. On 3/27/25 at 1:00pm, V1 (Administrator) said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed provide respectful dining service by serving residents at the same table at the same time, keeping residents from taking food from other residents for 8 (R4, R9, R10, R24, R29, R39, R42, R44) of 21 residents reviewed for dining in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R24's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 09/30/24 with diagnoses in part of diabetes mellitus and vitamin d deficiency. R24's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 01/06/25 documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating as setup and clean-up assistance. Section K documents no weight loss or weight gain. R24's Care Plan with date revised date of 10/20/24 documents a focus area of R24 (resident) has potential nutritional problem r/t (related to) edentulous, receives therapeutic diet. Interventions include in part: provide and serve diet as ordered. On 03/10/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents with a history of weight loss or at risk for nutritional problems received ordered supplements with meals for 6 of 6 residents (R7, R12, R17, R19, R23, R35) reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 39. Findings Include: On 03/11/24 between 11:40 AM and 12:25 PM, R7, R12, R17, and R23 did not receive a health shake or a nutritional ice cream with the lunch meal. On 03/12/25 between 11:43 AM and 12:27 PM, R7, R17, R19 and R23 did not receive a nutritional ice cream with the lunch meal. 1. R23's admission record documents an admission date of 11/09/21 with diagnoses including: dementia, cerebral infarction, delusional disorders, hallucinations, vitamin D deficiency, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, muscle wasting and atrophy and fatigue. R23's care plan documents a focus area noting: the resident has a potential nutritional problem of weight loss r/t (relating to) CVA (cerebrovascular accident), dementia with behaviors, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-17 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a physician perform a comprehensive evaluation within 30 days post admission for 5 of 5 residents (R2, R13, R48, R49, and R102) reviewed for physicians' visits in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1.) R2's admission Record documents an admission date of 01/20/25 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, liver cell carcinoma, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, anemia, and hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy. 2.) R102's admission record documents an admission date of 02/12/25 with diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies, dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, acute systolic heart failure, chronic kidney disease stage 1, chronic atrial fibrillation, and depression. 3.) R49's admission record documents an admission date of 02/07/25 neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, hyperlipidemia, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis. 4.) R13's admission record documents an admission date of 01/30/25 with chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with dementia received the necessary person-centered care and services consistent with the resident goals and symptomology for 5 of 8 residents (R23, R29, R32, R42, R44) reviewed for dementia care in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R32's admission record dated 3/13/25, documents an admission date of 05/17/23 with a diagnosis in part of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with agitation. R32's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/01/25, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG document set-up and clean up assistance with eating. Section I documents non-Alzheimer's dementia. R32's Care Plan with a revised date of 09/24/24 documents a focus area of risk for malnutrition r/t (related) dementia. 09/23/24 Remeron daily as ordered. Interventions include in part: Provide supervision during meals, R32 has another focus area of resident has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to process the returning and/or destroying of unused medication for 4 of 4 (R12, R16, R32, R156) residents reviewed for medications storage in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R32's admission record dated 3/13/25, documents an admission date of 05/17/23 with a diagnosis in part of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with agitation. R32's Physician orders documents order for Ipratr-albuter 0.5mg (milligrams)-3mg/ml (milliliters) ordered on 01/10/24. On 03/12/25 at 9:45AM, R32 had an open box of ipratropium Bromide and Albuterol Sulfate inhalation solution 0.5mg/3mg/3ml in the medication room refrigerator that expired on 02/2025. 2. R156's admission record dated 03/13/25, documents an admission date of 01/14/2019 and a discharge date of 02/25/25 with diagnoses in part of Alzheimer's, Dementia severe with other behavior disturbances, anemia, and hyponatremia. R156's Immunization record documents no Shingrix vaccine was given to R156. On 03/12/25 at 10:30AM there was a Shingrix vial kit 50mcg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 6 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the approved menu for portion sizes and items to be served for 8 of 21 residents (R2, R5, R7, R10, R11, R12, R14, R44) reviewed for dining in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. On 03/10/25 between 11:50 AM and 12:15 PM while observing the plating of the lunch meal R5, R7, R10, and R44 were served a number 12 scoop (2 2/3 ounces) of ground chicken. The facility document titled Diet Spreadsheet documents day 16 Monday dental soft (mech (mechanical) soft) ground fried chicken w/ (with) gravy #8 dipper (4 ounces). R7's current Physician Orders dated 03/13/25 documents an order for regular diet with mechanical soft texture with an order date of 01/23/25. R5's current Physician Orders dated 03/13/25 documents an order dated 01/29/25 of CCD (controlled carb (carbohydrate) diet), mechanical soft texture with a start date of 01/29/25 and no end date listed. R10's current Physician Orders dated 03/13/25 documents an order dated 01/29/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have assessments and/or physician's orders for lap restraints for 2 (R12 and R19) of 2 residents reviewed for restraints in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R12's admission record documents an admission date of 06/13/19 with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, unsteadiness on feet, and encounter for palliative care. R12's order summary report dated 03/13/25 does not document any order for a lap cushion. R12's current care plan does not document a focus area documenting a lap cushion. R12's hospice team visitation log dated 10/15/24 documents problem/intervention/goal: leans forward in wheelchair/lap cushion when up in wheelchair/pt (patient) will not fall out of wheelchair. 2. R19's admission record documents an admission date of 07/27/24 with diagnoses including: cerebral atherosclerosis, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, history of falling, moderate dementia with psychotic disturbance, peripheral vascular disease, muscle wasting and atrophy, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to perform fall risk assessments timely and implement effective interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 6 residents (R17) reviewed for falls in a sample of 39. Findings include: R17's admission record documents an admission date of 05/15/19, with the following diagnoses in part, Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbances. R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 99, indicating R17 was unable to complete interview. Fall investigation dated 12/23/24 documents R17 was being walked to the dining room with 2 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants). This fall investigation documents the following interventions were implemented, Frequent reminders to have help and assist with ambulation when needed. Fall investigations dated 02/13/25 and 02/22/25 for R17 documents no new interventions were implemented. R17's most recent fall risk assessment is dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that tables were properly cleaned and sanitized, prior to residents eating on them for 3 of 16 (R32, R41, and R44) reviewed for dining in the sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R32's admission record dated 3/13/25, documents an admission date of 05/17/23 with a diagnosis in part of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity with agitation. R32's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 3/01/25, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 99 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG document set-up and clean up assistance with eating. Section I documents non-Alzheimer's dementia. On 03/10/25 at 12:10PM, R153 got up from the table after he was done eating leaving his plate on the table. R32 walked into the dining room and sat down at the table spot that R153 had been eating at. R32 started to eat off the plate that R153 left on the table. R32 ate the rest of R153's chicken and mashed potatoes. V11 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) took R153's plate away from R32 and told him that he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Enhanced Barrier Precautions according to professional standards of practice for 3 out of 3 residents (R13, R22, R38) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. R38's admission record documents an admission date of 12/24/24 with the following diagnoses in part, local infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue and necrotizing fasciitis. R38's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating R38 is cognitively intact. R38's Order Summary Sheet dated 03/13/25 documents the following active treatment orders; Wound Cleansing Site: Cleanse BLE (Bilateral Lower Extremities) with saline. Apply xeroform, cover with calcium alginate, ABD (abdominal) pad and wrap with gauze, every day shift related to necrotizing fasciitis. Wound Cleansing Site: Cleanse left heel with normal saline or sterile water, apply calcium alginate, and cover with dry dressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain/offer influenza vaccinations for one (R34) resident of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations in a sample of 39. Findings include: R34's admission Record documents an admission date of 09/12/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. R34's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents a brief interview of mental status score of 99 indicating resident was unable to complete the interview. R34's current Physician's orders dated 03/17/25 documents an order stating: immunization: may have annual flu vaccine with consent unless contraindicated with an order date 09/16/2024 with no start date or end date noted. R34's electronic medical record does not contain any documentation that R34 received an influenza vaccination in 2024, nor does it contain documentation that R34 was offered the vaccine or refused. On 03/11/25 at 3:30 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$63,330 in federal fines across 4 penalties.
- $25,830 — penalty dated 2026-03-04
- $7,000 — penalty dated 2024-10-03
- $10,000 — penalty dated 2024-06-27
- $20,500 — penalty dated 2024-03-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BERKOWITZ, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2024 |
| DAUBER, ELIANA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2024 |
| DAUBER, JONATHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| MEYSTEL, YOSEF | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 12/01/2024 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| AXIOM CARE, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| CHESTER, MEGAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| OSBORNE, KIERSTEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| ZAMAN, ASAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| FRANKEL, FREDERICK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/22/2025 |
| GOLDFARB, BRIAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/22/2025 |
| HAMUI, MORIEL | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/22/2025 |
| SEITLER, DOVID | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/22/2025 |
| ULBERT, LISA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/22/2025 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| PETERSEN SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/22/2025 |
| KAPLAN, MORDECHAI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| RAJCHENBACH, CHAIM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WEBB, JESSICA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146201. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.