Meadowbrook Manor - Naperville
720 Raymond Drive, Naperville, IL 60563 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 249 certified beds · (630) 355-0220 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $133,390 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-23)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.9% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.8% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 95.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.6% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.9% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.0% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.0% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.7% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.9% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.9% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.71 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.78 | 2.22 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.0%CMS range 29.0–50.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.7%CMS range 9.9–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 28.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 5.6–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 249 beds and averages 211.8 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.85 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.59 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse. R6 was found with R7 in his closed bedroom with a chair placed to block the door. R6 is severely cognitively impaired and she was sitting on R7's bed, exposed, with her pants and incontinence brief around her ankles. R7 was naked from the waist down. Staff also failed to identify R7's behaviors (getting into a female resident's bed and disrobing in the hallway) as potentially sexually inappropriate behaviors, and failed to report those behaviors. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R6, R10) reviewed for abuse. As a result, this type of inappropriate, nonconsensual sexual contact would reasonably cause psycho-social harm, and it can be determined that a reasonable person in R6's position would have experienced psycho-social harm (such as humiliation and fear) as a result of the sexual abuse. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). The IJ began on December 24, 2023 when R7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-07-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a diabetic resident's feet were monitored to prevent complications. This failure resulted in the resident acquiring a necrotic diabetic ulcer on her left heel. This applies to 1 out of 3 residents (R5) reviewed for foot care. The findings include: R5's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, diabetes, stenosis, and vascular disease. R5's EMR said she was dependent on staff assistance with her mobility and hygiene care, and at risk for developing ulcers. On 6/30/2025 at 9 AM, V24 (Wound Care Nurse/WCN) changed R5's left heel wound dressing. R5's wound was open with serosanguinous drainage. V24 said R5's diabetic wound was acquired on 3/31/2025, and now required an outpatient vascular consultation for possible vascular surgical intervention because of her wound. V24 said nursing staff was expected to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident with high risk for falls. This failure resulted in the resident falling and requiring hospitalization for acute traumatic brain injury, seizures, and altered mental status. This applies to 1 out of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including history of falls, traumatic subdural hemorrhage, hydrocephalus with presence of cerebrospinal fluid drainage device, hallucinations, vascular dementia with moderate agitation, abnormalities of gait and mobility, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty in walking, cognitive deficit, and hearing loss. R1's EMR did not show a history of seizures. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/22/2024 said R1 was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with transfers. On 6/30/2025 at 3:15 PM, V9 (Nurse) said on 10/23/2024 at 12:30 PM, R1 was observed sitting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers were repositioned at regular intervals as ordered by the physician, received timely incontinence care, and received wound care treatments to ensure wounds are clean, as ordered by the physician. This failure resulted in delayed healing of R1's facility-acquired pressure ulcer. This failure applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 6. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR continues to show R1 was sent to the local hospital on January 2, 2025 and returned to the facility on January 9, 2025. R1 has multiple diagnoses including, acute encephalopathy due to sepsis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, major depressive disorder, PVD (Peripheral Vascular Disease), heart disease, idiopathic neuropathy, cognitive communication deficit,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform laboratory testing for residents with new respiratory illness symptoms. The facility also failed to follow their water management plan.This applies to all 212 residents residing in the facility.The finding include:The facility's Long-term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated [DATE], showed the facility census of 212 residents. 1. On [DATE], at 11:28 AM, R164 and R209 were residing in a room together. The sign outside of R164 and R209's room showed contact and droplet isolation. The signs did not show an N95 mask was required to enter the room. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R164 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease, epilepsy, nasal congestion, and cough. A progress note dated [DATE], at 1:01 AM by V17 (Nurse) showed Resident coughing, complained of sore throat and has raspy voice. Residents remain on [oseltamivir], Nurse Practitioner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dining experience in a manner that would promote dignity. This applies to 6 of 16 residents (R12, R42, R80, R138, R191, R199) reviewed for dining experience in the sample of 35. The findings include:On January 12, 2026, at 12:23 PM, during lunch time in the 3rd floor dining room there were several dining tables with group of residents sitting each table. Some of the residents were eating, and some were waiting for their trays to be served to them.1. A table by the TV area had a group of 5 residents sitting around including R42 and R191. R42 and R191 were waiting for their trays to be served and watching the other 3 residents who were already eating. At 12:41 PM, R42 and R191 received their trays while the other 3 residents were halfway through their meals. Though R42 and R191 received their lunch tray only R42 started eating because R191 needed assistance to eat. At 12:45 PM, a staff sat down by R191 and started setting up her tray to feed her, and as soon as R191 saw it, R191 tried to grab the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document the narcotic medication that were removed from its container for resident administration to ensure accurate count of the controlled medication. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R2, R18, R34, R55, R58, R109, R126, R141, R145, R74) reviewed for controlled medication count in the sample of 35. The finding include:On January 14, 2026, at 10:00 AM, narcotic count was conducted with V7 (Nurse) in the facility's memory care unit. 1. R55's Lorazepam 0.5 milligram (mg) tablet's log sheet showed 3 remaining tablets, however the actual count showed 2 tablets remaining. 2. R126's Alprazolam 0.5 mg tablet's log sheet showed 29 tablets, but the actual count showed 27 tablets remaining. 3. R145's Lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet's log sheet showed 9 remaining tablets, but the actual count showed 8 tablets remaining. 4. R74's Lorazepam 1 mg tablet log sheet showed 48 remaining tablets, however, actual count showed 47 tablets remaining. On January 14, 2026, at 10:16 AM, the narcotic count for 2B medication cart was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed offer the 2025-2026 Covid-19 vaccination to residents.This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R48, R71, R142, R162, and R164) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 35.The findings include:1.The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R48 was an [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including sleep apnea, hypertensive heart disease.R48's Immunization Report dated January 14, 2026, did not show R48 had received or offered the updated 2025-2026 COVID-19 vaccine.The facility did not have documentation to show R48 was offered the updated 2025-2026 COVID-19 vaccine.2. The EMR showed R71 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including transient ischemic attack, stroke and epilepsy.R71's Immunizations Report dated January 14, 2026, did not show R71 had received or offered the updated 2025-2026 COVID-19 vaccine.The facility did not have documentation to show R71 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep a resident free from chemical restraint. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R11) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 35. The findings include:R11's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with psychotic disturbances, major depressive disorder, and adjustment disorder with anxiety. R11's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated November 26, 2025, showed R11 had moderately impaired cognition. R11's MDS showed R11 takes and antipsychotic and antidepressant. R11's care plan showed R11 uses psychotropic medications (See MAR, Medication Administration Record) related to MDD (Major Depressive Disorder) and adjustment disorder with anxiety. The intervention included consult with pharmacy, MD (Medical Doctor) to consider dosage reduction when clinically appropriate at least quarterly. R11's January MAR showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide assistance in cleaning and trimming nails to residents that needed extensive assistance for personal hygiene.The applies to 3 of 5 (R1, R97, R108) residents, reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 35. The findings include:1. R1's face sheet showed multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, vascular dementia, moderate, with other behavioral disturbance, aphasia following cerebral infarction, unsteadiness on feet, cognitive communication deficit, personal history of other diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue.R1's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated January 1, 2026, showed that R1 was cognitively intact and required substantial maximal assistance (helper does more than half the effort, Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort) in personal hygiene. On January 12, 2026, at 11:58…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to meet the care needs of residents. Staffing was insufficient to provide residents with assistance with incontinence care, preventing the development of pressure wounds, assisting with care needs, answering the call light and screams for help.This applies to 4 residents R1, R2, R3 and R6 in a sample of 6. Findings include:1.On 9/2/25 at 11:48 AM, R1stated she had recently admitted , and had a pressure wound on her buttocks and UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) since arriving to the facility. R1 stated the facility is short staffed. R1 stated on a few occasions she had called for incontinence care and left waiting for hours. R1 stated on one occasion she called V8 (Family Member) requesting he call the nursing station after waiting hours to be cleaned up of urine and feces. On 9/2/25 at 11:55 AM, V6 (CNA -Certified Nursing Assistant) and V13 (PT -Physical Therapist) came to R1's bedside for skin and brief observation. R1's undergarment was dry with a large streak of dried feces. Dried…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide personal care to a resident with a pressure ulcer. This applies to 1 of 4 (R1) residents reviewed for pressure wounds in a sample of 6.Findings include:On 9/2/25 at 11:48 AM, R1stated she had recently admitted , but had developed a pressure wound on her buttocks and UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) since arriving to the facility. R1 stated the facility is short staffed. R1 stated on a few occasions she had called for incontinence care and left waiting for hours. R1 stated on one occasion she called V8 Family Member requesting he call the nursing station after waiting hours to be provided care. On 9/2/25 at 11:55 AM, V6 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and V13 PT (Physical Therapist) came to R1's bedside for skin and brief observation. R1's undergarment was dry with large streak of dried feces. Dried caked feces were between the gluteal fold. R1's labia and gluteal fold was reddened. R1 had a small open area on her coccyx.On 9/2/25 at 12:32 PM, V6 CNA stated her shift started a 6AM, but she had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate and report an allegation of financial abuse by a family member. This applies to 1 out of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for financial abuse. The findings include: On 6/30/2025 at 1:10 PM, R4 was fatigued in bed. R4 at times during the interview became frustrated and showed signs of impaired memory. R4 said V8 (Family Member) had stolen his money from his bank account. R4 was unable to provide details of when it occurred and how much money he believed was stolen. R4 said after the alleged incident, he made sure V8 no longer had access to his bank account. R4 said he also removed V8 from his financial power of attorney (POA). On 6/30/2025 at 3 PM, V5 (Nurse Practitioner/NP) said R4 had recently started to decline physically and cognitively. V5 said R4's cognition was impaired and unable to make decisions on his own now. On 6/30/2025 at 10:45 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said on 4/23/2025, V7 (R4's Family Member) called the facility, alleging R4 informed her V8 was stealing from his bank account. V2 said she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pressure ulcer intervention of a pressure-relieving mattress was working for a resident with known multiple pressure wounds. This applies to 1 out of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for pressure wounds. The findings include: On 6/29/2025 at 9:45 AM, R4 said he had pain all over his back. R4 was in bed on an air-loss mattress, with a beeping alarm. V20 (Certified Nurse Assistant) turned R4 in bed, and R4 was lying on two overlapping cloth pads and a sheet, which were bunched up together. V25 (Wound Care Nurse/WCN) said R4 was recently readmitted with multiple pressure wounds and required the use of an air-loss mattress. V25 changed R4's dressing to his left posterior lower leg vascular wound and pressure wounds to his bilateral mid buttock, coccyx, and right lateral buttock. At 10:15 AM, V20 and V25 finished providing care to R4's wounds. The beeping alarm on R4's mattress continued and the mattress was not inflated because the mattress was disconnected from the pump. V25 said she believed R4's mattress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident with his social services needs. This applies to 1 out of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for social service needs. The findings include: On 6/30/2025 at 1:10 PM, R4 was fatigued in bed. R4 at times during the interview became frustrated and showed signs of impaired memory. R4 said V8 (Family Member) was no longer his Power of Attorney (POA) for health and finance. R4 said he believed V7 (Family Member) was now his assigned POA for health and finance. On 6/30/2025 at 10:45 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said on 4/23/2025, V7 (R4's Family Member) called informing the facility that R4 was seeking legal aid to assist him in revoking his POA and divorce from V8. V2 said she informed V3 (Social Services/SS). On 6/30/2025 at 2:30 PM, V3 (SS) said residents were provided with social services, and if needed outside, referrals were made. V3 said R4 was a long-term care resident at the facility. V3 said she followed up with R4 on 4/25/2025, and he verbally revoked his financial and health POA from V8. V3 said R4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow insulin administration instructions for a diabetic resident. As a result of this failure, R4 had an acute episode of hypoglycemia, which required the administration of emergency reversal-medications by emergency paramedics. This applies to 1 out of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for diabetes management. The findings include: On 6/30/2025 at 11:45 AM, V11 (Nurse) said she administered R4's scheduled insulin on 6/17/2025. V11 said insulin was administered based on the order. V11 continued to say that if a resident refuses to eat, they should not receive their fast-acting insulin because their blood sugar would drop. V11 said she believed residents with diabetes required an active order for emergency glucagon for emergency episodes of hypoglycemia. On 6/30/2025 at 12 PM, V18 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) said on 6/17/2025, R4 refused his breakfast and lunch meals. V18 said she was concerned R4's blood sugar would drop and informed the nurse on duty and V18 documented R4's meal refusals. On 6/30/2024 at 11:50 AM, V12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use a two-person transfer with a gait belt, as shown in the EMR (Electronic Medical Record), for a resident with a history of multiple falls. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for accidents and supervision in the sample of 3. The findings include: On June 12, 2025, at 11:21 AM, V3 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) transferred R2 from the wheelchair to the toilet. No other staff were present. V3 said R2 was wearing regular socks and did not have shoes. V3 tightly held R2's waist band of her pants and R2's incontinence brief to lift the resident from the wheelchair to the toilet. V3 did not use a gait belt. As V3 was attempting to stand R2, R2's knees were buckling and R2 was unable to bear her full weight as she was being transferred to the toilet. R2 was unable to follow V3's instructions due to her cognitive status. V3 said R2 needed a new incontinence brief due to R2's previous incontinence brief being torn after it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to ensure residents received timely incontinence care, showers, oral care, and assistance with shaving. This failure applies to 5 of 6 residents (R1, R2, R3, R5, and R6) reviewed for assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) in the sample of 6. The findings include: 1. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR continues to show R1 was sent to the local hospital on January 2, 2025 and returned to the facility on January 9, 2025. R1 has multiple diagnoses including, acute encephalopathy due to sepsis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, major depressive disorder, PVD (Peripheral Vascular Disease), heart disease, idiopathic neuropathy, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, severe sepsis with septic shock, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, hydronephrosis, Stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy to immediately notify a resident's representative when a resident had a change in condition requiring transfer to the local hospital. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition notification in the sample of 6. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The EMR continues to show R1 was sent to the local hospital on January 2, 2025, and returned to the facility on January 9, 2025. R1 has multiple diagnoses including, acute encephalopathy due to sepsis, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, diabetes, multiple sclerosis, paraplegia, major depressive disorder, PVD (Peripheral Vascular Disease), heart disease, idiopathic neuropathy, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, severe sepsis with septic shock, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, hydronephrosis, Stage 4 pressure ulcer of the sacral region, weakness, dementia, hearing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview the facility failed to ensure that sanitary practices are maintained to prevent cross contamination during dishwashing procedure and storage of dish rags. This applies to 199 residents that receive foods prepared and served from the facility kitchen. The findings include: The facility provided information that on October 7, 2024 the facility census was 203 residents with 4 residents on NPO (nothing by mouth) status. On October 7, 2024 at 9:20 AM, during initial tour of the kitchen, multiple rags that were both dry and wet/dirty were seen strewn on free standing carts. On October 7, 2024 at 9:24 AM, during the dishwashing procedure at the high temperature dish machine, V10 (Dietary Aide), who was wearing gloves, was observed washing and rinsing dirty dishes prior to loading them on racks to send through the dish machine for sanitation. V10 was then seen going to the clean side without changing her gloves or washing her hands and unloading cleaned water pitchers and a plate guard and put them away on a shelf. V11 (Dietary Aide) was seen walking in from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene and grooming. This applies to 7 of 7 residents (R29, R58, R129, R149, R152, R153 and R180) reviewed for ADL (activities of daily living) in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R29 had multiple diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance and weakness, based on the face sheet. R29's admission MDS (minimum data set) dated September 27, 2024 showed that the resident was moderately impaired with cognitive skills for daily decision making and required substantial/maximum assistance with personal hygiene. On October 7, 2024 at 12:11 PM, R29 was eating inside the unit dining room. R29 was non-verbal. R29 had accumulation of facial hair above her upper lip. On October 8, 2024 at 10:20 AM, R29 was sitting in her wheelchair inside the unit dining room. R29 had accumulation of facial hair above her upper lip. V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing) was present…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to label and date medications after it was opened to determine expiration dates and failed to remove expired medications from the medication carts. In addition, the facility failed to ensure that a narcotic with a broken package/container is discarded. This applies to 10 of 10 residents (R16, R27, R88, R106, R115, R129, R132, R146, R148, and R180) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 35. The findings include: On October 09, 2024, from 10:59 AM through 12:16 PM, multiple medication carts were inspected with the corresponding nurses (V23, V29, V30, V31) assigned to each cart, and the following were observed. 1. R180's Insulin Glargine and Insulin Lispro were opened and not dated. 2. R27's Lantus Pen was opened and not dated. 3. R129's vial of Lispro has a label which shows that it was opened on 9/1/24 and expired on 10/1/24. 4. R16's Alprazolam 0.25 mg tab #25 container was torn open and taped over. 5. R148's Insulin Lispro has a label which shows that it was opened on 8/24/24 and expired on 9/23/24. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound treatment as ordered. This applies to 1 of 7 residents (R112) reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention and treatment in the sample of 35. This failure resulted in the worsening of an acquired pressure ulcer wound from a stage 2 to an unstageable wound. The findings include: R112's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R112, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including unspecified dementia, age related osteoporosis, unspecified macular degeneration, cognitive communication deficit, adult failure to thrive and mild protein-calorie malnutrition. R112's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated September 10, 2024, showed R112 had severe cognitive impairment and required assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) including substantial assistance with eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and bed mobility and was dependent on staff for transfer. R112's wound assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to apply a resting hand splint for a resident to prevent contractures. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R155) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 35. The findings include: R155's face sheet included diagnoses of Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, without mention of fluctuations, cognitive communication deficit, spinal stenosis, site unspecified. R155's significant change MDS (minimum data set) dated August 30, 2024 included that R155 is cognitively intact and has upper extremity impairment on both sides. R155's care plan-initiated May 15, 2024 included that R155 requires splint to left hand related to further deterioration. Interventions for the same included to apply splint/brace to left hand. On AM/Off at lunch by the restorative nurse. R155's Physician Order Sheet showed Patient to wear left hand resting splint, on with morning ADL (activities of daily living) and off after lunch, off for hygiene, exercise and skin check every shift by nursing staff. On October 7, 2024 at 12:12 PM, R155 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe transfer for a resident who requires 2 staff assistance for transfer from one area to another. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R99) reviewed for transfers in the sample of 35. The findings include: Face sheet shows R99 is 82 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, encounter for palliative care. R99 is under hospice care. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], shows R99 is cognitively impaired and requires maximum assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) care. On October 7, 2024, at 11:18 AM, V7 (Hospice Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) transferred R99 from bed to the reclining wheelchair via mechanical lift. V7 transferred R99 by himself (V7) without another staff to help him. On October 9, 2024, at 10:53 AM, V35 (Restorative Director) stated, there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the alternate meal with similar nutritive value as the main entrée for residents that had history of weight loss. This applies to 2 of 6 residents (R60, R152) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 35. The findings include: Facility spread sheet for Week 2 Tuesday showed that the main meal for lunch consisted of Turkey Burger Patty Melt (1 portion=3 oz protein). On October 8, 2024 at 12:05 PM, V12 (Assistant Cook) stated that she prepared egg salad sandwich for the substitute menu and put 2 oz/ounce of egg salad per sandwich using a #16 scoop. The egg salad sandwiches that were already prepared appeared to have a thin layer of egg salad within each sandwich. Facility scoop guidance titled Disher Capacity showed that blue color #16 scoop =2.07 fluid oz. Recipe for Egg Salad Sandwich for 3 oz portion serving included to portion 2 #10 scoops of egg salad unto half of bread slices. Serve 1 sandwich (2 halves) with 2,#10 scoops of egg salad for 3 oz protein serving. 1. R152's face sheet included diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's order during medication administration. There were 32 medication opportunities with 5 errors resulting to 15.63% medication error rate. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R25 and R164) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. On October 8, 2024, at 9:35 AM, V4 (Nurse) administered multiple medications to R25. Prior to the administration, V4 prepared the medications by putting it in the medication cup and identifying each medication and its dosage one of the medications and/or vitamins included was Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol). V4 said that she was giving one tablet of Vitamin D3 1000 units (IU) or 25 micrograms (mcg). V4 took one tablet of the Vitamin D3 from the container bottle in the cart and the bottle was labeled Vitamin D3 10mcg (400IU). R25's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month of October 2024, shows multiple medications scheduled for the morning which included Cholecalciferol 1000 units, Cyanocobalamin 1000 mcg, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices related to hand hygiene, removal of gown after leaving resident's bedroom, and disposal of soiled linen and gown. This applies to 3 of 35 residents (R25, R129, and R146) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 35. The findings include: 1. R25 is on EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precaution). On October 8, 2024, at 9:35 AM V4 (Nurse) administered intravenous (IV) medication to R25. Prior to administration, V4 donned isolation gown and gloves. After V4 administered the IV medication, V4 removed her gloves and left the bedroom still wearing the isolation gown. V4 went to the medication cart which was parked across the hallway from R25's bedroom, where V4 continued to prepare R125's oral medications. V4 re-entered R25's bedroom to administer the oral medications, while wearing the same gown. V4 came out again without removing the gown to write a label for the IV medication. When asked why she had not removed the gown, V4 said that that she was not yet done with R25. 2. On October…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of resident abuse for 1 of 6 residents (R1) in the sample of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: On 9/18/24 AT 10:00 AM, R1 was noted to have yellow/green bruising around her left eye orbit and a small purple mark under her left eye near her cheek bone. When asked what happened to her eye, R1 imitated a fist punching her in the left eye while saying the muchacho. R1 then became tearful and used a tissue to dab at her eyes. On 9/18/24 at 10:09 AM, V5, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), said if a resident had a new bruise, he would ask them what happened. He would ask the CNAs (certified nursing assistants) if they knew about any injuries to the resident. V5 said he would report it to the supervisor and the administrator. V5 said they would need to investigate it. V5 said the investigation would include interviewing staff from the present shift back 24-48 hours prior to find out if anything happened during care of the resident. They could review video to see if it would provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and obtain treatment orders for a resident with a known surgical wound. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed a readmission date of 8/05/2024. R1's EMR showed R1 had multiple diagnoses including left gluteal abscess, urinary tract infection, right arm deep vein thrombosis, metabolic encephalopathy, vascular dementia, morbid obesity, and malnutrition. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/03/2024 showed R1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required substantial to maximal staff assistance with toileting hygiene. On 8/09/2024 at 12:30 PM, V10 (Certified Nurse Assistant/CNA) and V11 (Restorative Aide) were providing care to R1 and were asked to check R1's skin. V10 said R1 was readmitted with a wound to her left inner groin area that was not covered. R1 had an exposed open tunneling wound to her left inner gluteal fold area. R1's wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff (V3, Registered Nurse) and (V16, CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant) failed to report an allegation of mistreatment and or potential sexual abuse to the administrator. This applies to one of nine residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 12. The findings include: The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed that R1, an [AGE] year-old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's diagnoses included osteomyelitis of vertebra, lumbar region, spinal stenosis, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), polyneuropathy, ASHD (atherosclerotic heart disease), depression, history of UTI (urinary tract infection), history of malignant neoplasm of uterus, and contact dermatitis. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] showed that R1 was cognitively intact with BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 15/15. The MDS showed R1's functional status that she required moderate to extensive assistance with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to isolate to control the spread of a potential communicable disease for residents identified with suspicious rashes. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1-R3) reviewed for infection control practices. The finding includes: On 12/26/2023 at 10:46 AM, R1 was in bed, he said he was itchy. R1 had scattered dry spots on his left arm, right posterior thigh area, neck area, and left chest fold area. R1 said he saw the dermatologist and had a skin biopsy and does not know the results. R1 said the dermatologist ordered the cream and told him to shower. R1 said he was never isolated for his rash. R1 said his roommate R2 was also itchy. On 12/26/2023 at 11:00 AM, R2 was in bed covered with a blanket and scratching his leg underneath the blanket. R2 was non-interviewable. On 12/26/2023 at 1:10 PM, R3 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room (R3's room is accross R1 and R2's room). R3 said her rash was terrible and could not stop scratching. R3 said that when she's in therapy she needs to constantly stop to scratch. R3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for self-administration of medications and, failed to obtain physician orders to have medications stored in resident rooms. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R27, R67, R84 and R105) reviewed for medications in the sample of 73. The findings include: 1. On 10/31/23 at 10:23 AM, during initial tour rounds, R67 was resting in bed. R67 had a bottle of Miconazole nitrate 2% (antifungal powder) on her bedside table. R67 said she uses if for the rash under her arms. R67's current physician order sheet (POS) reviewed; R67 did not have an order for the antifungal powder or to self-administer medications. R67's care plan was reviewed, R67 was to care planned to self-administer medications. 2. On 10/31/23 at 11:12 AM, R27 was sitting by the side of her bed; R27 had Albuterol Sulfate HFA (hydrofluoroalkane) inhaler, Qvar redihaler (Beclomethasone Dipropionate HFA) breath activated inhaler aerosol on her bedside table. R27 had a clear plastic bag which had a glucometer, bottle insulin test strips, and six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0557 — patternHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dignified care during medication administration and failed to promote dignity of a resident with indwelling catheter. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R56, R138, R141 and R195) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 73. The findings include: 1. On 11/1/23 at 11:00 AM, V23 (Agency Registered Nurse) administered R56's G-Tube (Gastrostomy) medications in her room. R56's bed was close to the window; V23 failed to close R56's privacy curtain and close the door during the medication administration. R56 was visible from the hallway, and R164 (R56's roommate) was in the room during the g-tube medication administration. R56's face sheet (11/1/23) showed the following diagnoses of generalized idiopathic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, adult failure to thrive. R56's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/6/23 shows that her cognition is moderately impaired. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have call lights accessible to dependent residents. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R24, R26, R164, R175, and R184) reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 73. The findings include: 1. On 10/31/23 at 11:54 AM, during initial tour rounds on the second floor, R175 was observed sitting in his wheelchair by the bedside. R175's call light could not be located. R175's face sheet (11/1/23) showed the following diagnoses of Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia, dementia, neuro cognitive disorder with Lewy bodies and history of falling. R175's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/18/23 showed that R175's cognition is severely impaired and needs extensive assistance with two or more person physical assist with toilet use. R175's care plan (revised on 9/22/23) is at risk for falls, with interventions to educate resident, family and care givers about safety reminders. 2. On 10/31/23 at 12:03 PM, R164 called out from her room and asked if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain hazard free environment to residents. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R27, R37, R157, R163 and R191) reviewed for accidents and supervision in a sample of 73. The findings include: 1. On 10/31/23 at 11:12 AM, R27 was sitting by the side of her bed. R27 had a clear plastic bag which had a glucometer, bottle insulin test strips, and six lancets on the dresser. On 11/1/23 at 9:22 AM, the glucometer, lancets, test strips were still on R27's dresser. On 11/2/23 at 9:10 AM, the glucometer, lancets, test strips were still on R27's dresser. R27 said she checks her glucose levels every night because her glucose levels runs high. There were no sharps container in R27's room; surveyor asked R27 where she disposes the used lancets, R27 pointed to the trash can by her bedside. R27's face sheet (11/1/23) showed the following diagnoses of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hypoglycemia, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with other circulatory complications, chronic kidney disease, stage 3 and acquired absence of kidney. R27's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY .Based on observation, interview and record review, facility failed to follow contact isolation precautions, follow appropriate hand hygiene, contain soiled linen and provide appropriate personal hygiene. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R5, R111, R46 and R114) reviewed for infection control in a sample size of 73. Findings include: 1. R177's stool culture report dated 11/1/23 showed clostridium difficile toxin antigen positive. Progress notes dated 10/30/23 at 10:41 showed stool sample was collected, as R177 had diarrhea two times. On 10/31/23 at 10:53 AM, R177's room had a 'contact isolation' sign board outside his room and PPE (personal protective equipment) was available outside the room. R177 was sitting on his adult reclining chair in his room with two visitors at his bedside without PPE on. Visitors were seen to be touching the bed of R177. R177's face-sheet showed, R177 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include congestive heart failure, encephalopathy and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and s reviews, the facility failed to report and provide necessary care to 2 residents (R24, R46) who were reviewed for change in condition in a sample of 73. 1. On 10/31/23 R24, who has a history of coronary artery disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation, and a history of myocardial infarction, was observed in her bed reporting to have chest pain and her call light was not in reach. R24 said she had not called for help because she was unable to find her call light. The surveyor reported to R24's nurse V5, that R24 was complaining of chest pain. At 11:59am V5 came into R24's room and R24 told her she was having chest pain. V5 told her she would go get her some Tylenol for her pain and left R24's room. V5 did not assess R24's vital signs at that time. Then at 12:05pm V5 returned to R24's room and gave R24 the Tylenol but still did not take R24's vital signs. On 10/31/23 at 11:59am V5 was asked why she did not take R24's vital signs and she said because she complains of chest pain a lot and was sent out to the hospital in the past for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a resident from developing a pressure ulcer. This applies to 1 of 4 resident R115 reviewed for facility acquired pressure ulcers in a sample of 73 residents. Findings include: R115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes dementia, osteoporosis, dysphagia, and failure to thrive. R115 developed a stage 4 pressure ulcer 11 months after admission to the faciity. On 11/01/23 at 10:24 AM, wound care was observed. Due to R115's positioning and severity of the finger ontracture the wound was not visualized. When the soiled dressing was removed from R115 right hand and bright red blood was observed. V30 (Restorative Aid) stated R115 was supposed to have a rolled washcloth in her contracted hand at all times. V31 (Wound Nurse) stated R115 was admitted to the facility with contractures, but developed the right hand wound while in the facility. If R115 had a hand splint or rolled washcloth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure anti-contracture devices were applied as ordered. This applies to 1 of 16 residents (R195) reviewed for anti-contracture devices in a sample size of 73. The findings include: On 10/31/2023 at 10:54 AM, R195 was observed with his left hand in a fist position. R195 did not have a splint on. He said staff has not been applying his splint. A sign on top of his bed said R195 needs a splint on his left hand, on after breakfast and off before dinner. On 11/1/2023 at 11:10 AM, R195 was not wearing a splint on his left hand. On 11/1/2023 at 2:23 PM, R195 had no splint on his left hand. On 11/02/2023 at 9:12 AM, V21 (Restorative Director) said R195 needs to wear splint for stiffness on his left hand. V21 said if splint is not worn, the stiffness will get worse. R195 admission Records show R195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R195's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left nondominant side. R195's Physician Order…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide necessary catheter care in a timely manner to 1 of 3 residents (R46) reviewed for catheter care in a sample of 73. On 10/31/23 at 1:35pm V9 CNA (Certified Nurse's Assistant) was preparing R46 for a shower. V9 removed R46's brief and observed urine in his brief, R46 has an indwelling catheter. V9 told R46 that his catheter must be leaking, and she would tell his nurse. On 11/1/23 at 2:58pm a review of R46's electronic records did not show any documentation of a report that R46's catheter was leaking urine. On 11/2/23 at 9:38am V5 (Nurse) said that V9 never reported that R45's catheter was leaking. On 11/2/23 at 10:08am V5 checked R46's brief and observed urine in his brief. At 10:13am V5 said that she notified R46's Nurse Practitioner about the leaking catheter and was given orders to change the catheter. On 11/2/23 at 1:47pm, V2 DON said that if urine is observed in a brief of a person with a catheter, it should be reported. V2 said This should be done because the catheter could be damaged or kinked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary storage of respiratory equipment when not in use. This applies to 3 out of 4 (R5, R27, and R97) residents reviewed for use of respiratory equipment in the sample size of 73. 1. Different observations on 10/31/2023 at 11:03 AM and 11/1/2023 showed R97's firm plastic suction tip was not contained and was left on top of the suction machine. R97 had a decannulated tracheostomy with stoma open to air. On 11/2/2023 at 9:31 AM, V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) said respiratory equipment should be cleaned and contained in a bag for infection control. R97's admission Records show R97 was admitted on 8/ 16/2023. R97's diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of lung and larynx. Facility's Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) - Prevention of Infection Policy revised on November 2011 sated the following: . Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to guide associated with respiratory tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$133,390 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $133,390 — penalty dated 2024-01-23
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DESCENDANTS S CORP FBO ASHLEY MARIA DIMAS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 07/11/1989 |
| DESCENDANTS S CORP TRUST FBO SASHA EVA DIMAS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 07/11/1989 |
| DESCENDANTS S CORP TRUST FBO SEAN WILLIAM DIMAS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 7% | since 07/11/1989 |
| DOROTHY VANGEL QSS TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 07/11/1989 |
| JAFARI, KIANOOSH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 13% | since 02/12/2015 |
| JAFARI, SOUSSAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 13% | since 07/11/1989 |
| VANGEL, DOROTHY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 10% | since 07/11/1989 |
| VANGEL, NICHOLAS | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 10% | since 07/11/1989 |
| VANGEL, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/23/1998 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145874. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.