Tabor Hills Health Care Fac
1347 Crystal Court, Naperville, IL 60563 · Non profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (630) 778-6677 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.2% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.7% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.6% | 14.3% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.6% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.4% | 21.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.8% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.6% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.1% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.05 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.84 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 287 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 220 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.2%CMS range 53.2–64.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 7.7–12.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 81.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 4.3–9.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.06 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 71.8 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.90 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.23 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.11 to 1.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the hot water dish machine reached 160 degrees Fahrenheit rinse temperature, failed to ensure staff changed gloves between handling soiled and clean dishes and failed to ensure the dry storage area did not contain expired canned food products. This applies to all 63 residents who receive oral diets from the kitchen. The findings include: On May 6, 2024, at 10:11 AM, V6 (Dietary Aide) was washing dishes using the hot water dish machine. V3 (Maintenance Director) and V4 (Dining Room Supervisor) were present and were asked to validate the dish machine temperature, V3 placed the disc thermometer in the dish rack. V3 then placed the rack on the conveyor and ran it through the dish machine. Upon exiting the machine, the thermometer showed a temperature of 153 F (Fahrenheit) degrees. V3 and V4 were both present and aware of the temperature reading. At 10:19 AM, V3 placed the thermometer in the dish rack again, placed the dish rack on the conveyor, and upon exiting the machine the thermometer showed 157.6 F. V6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer the pneumococcal vaccine to residents according to the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R8, R13, R17, and R56) in the sample of 19. The findings include: On May 7, 2024, at 1:22 PM, V7 (Infection Preventionist Nurse) said the facility follows CDC recommendations for pneumococcal vaccine timing. 1. R8's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R8 was a [AGE] year-old resident, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including hypertension, pneumonia, and anemia. R8's Immunization Record showed R8 received the PCV13 (13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) on March 15, 2022. R8's undated Consent to Administer Pneumococcal Polysaccharide (PPSV) Vaccine showed R8's Resident Representative consented for R8 to receive the pneumococcal vaccine. On May 8, 2024, at 1:01 PM, V8 (Infection Control Nurse) said R8 should have received the PPSV23 vaccine one year after receiving the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative therapies to a resident scheduled for therapies per her plan of care. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R41) reviewed for rehabilitation in a sample of 19. The findings include: R41's Medical Record, dated May 2024, shows R41's diagnoses included artificial hip, osteoarthritis right and left shoulders, cerebral infarction and transient ischemic attack, osteoarthritis left shoulder, scoliosis, and osteoporosis. Restorative Joint Mobility Evaluation 3/12/24, shows R41 had limited ROM of the front left shoulder related to stiffness, arthritic digits of the left and right hand. The evaluation shows R41 required AROM (Active Range of Motion) of BUE (Bilateral Upper Extremity) and bilateral ankles. R41 had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis of bilateral shoulders and transferred with a standing lift assisted by two staff. Care plan, initiated 3/12/24, shows R41 had a wedge compression fracture of her thoracic 11-12 vertebrae, thoraco-lumbar anterolisthesis of L4 on L5, osteoarthritis of bilateral knees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to apply palm protectors to a resident's contracted hands per her plan of care. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R14) reviewed for ROM (Range of Motion) in a sample of 19. The findings include: R14's Care Plan, initiated March 20, 2020, shows R14 was at risk for contractures due to decreased strength, impaired coordination, poor endurance and balance, and poor memory. The care plan shows R14 was to wear a palm protector which should be applied in the morning and removed at bedtime. The care plan shows staff should check for redness on the surrounding area. Physician order, dated March 18, 2024, shows R14 was to have Palm Protector applied to her hands every morning and removed before bedtime. The staff were to check for redness in the surrounding areas. On May 6, 2024, at 10:56 AM, R14 was in reclining wheelchair in the dining room. The fingers of both of R14's hands were very contracted and were closing toward palm of each hand. R14 was holding white gauze between her contracted fingers and palm in her left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly positioned in a shower chair during a shower. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R265) reviewed for falls in the sample of 19. The findings include: R265's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R265 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including encephalopathy, fall, weakness, and dementia. R265's Brief Interview for Mental Status dated May 7, 2024, showed R265 was cognitively intact. R265's Functional Abilities and Goals dated May 1, 2024, showed R265 required maximal assistance from facility staff for transferring to and from the tub/shower. On May 8, 2024, at 11:28 AM, R265 said she got a shower a few days ago and the shower chair tipped over when the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) was done washing her. On May 8, 2024, at 11:38 AM, V9 (CNA) said she was giving R265 a shower in her room and R265 attempted to stand up to wash herself. V9 said she instructed R265 to sit back…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food items in sanitary conditions by having unlabeled and undated food items in dry storage and in a walk-in cooler, and ice buildup on food items and the ceiling in the freezer. This affects all 70 residents consuming food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 6/14/23 at 10:10 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing - DON) stated, We have 70 residents on the certified side. Two are on gastrostomy tube (GT) feeding, but they are also on pleasure feeding. So, all 70 residents are eating from the kitchen. On 6/16/23 at 9:40 AM, during the initial kitchen tour with V5 (Assistant Dietary Manager), the dry kitchen storage was observed with a partially used five-pound [NAME] Cracker Crumbs with no label or date. On 6/16/23 at 9:45 AM, the kitchen walk-in cooler was observed with two apple pies with no label or date, and two pounds of sliced ham dated 6/5/23 (11 days earlier), partially covered with plastic wrap. On 6/16/23 at 9:45 AM, V5 stated, Sliced hams are good for seven days and should be fully covered . All food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures to prevent cross-contamination from soiled linens, soiled gloves, incontinence wipes, and resident trays. This applies to 11 of 23 residents (R4, R12, R17, R28, R42, R49, R52, R56, R60, R68, and R278) reviewed for infection control. Findings include: 1. On June 13, 2023, at 11:26 am, V7 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) placed a disposable incontinence brief and pants on R278 while R278 was in a standing position, V7 threw R278's soiled under pad onto the floor. R278 was assisted to her wheelchair. While still wearing soiled gloves, V7 walked out of R278's bedroom to the clean linen cart in the hallway. V7 lifted the covering of the linen cart wearing the soiled gloves and removed towels and a pillowcase. V7 returned to R278's room, removed the soiled gloves, and used hand sanitizer. R278's room contained three beds and R278 is assigned to bed #3; beds #1 and #2 were both made and ready for new admissions. V7 moved R278's soiled linen and clothing she had previously placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen food storage was free of pests which applies to all 81 residents reviewed for sanitary food storage. The findings include: The CMS-672 dated 8/22/22 showed a census of 81 residents. On 8/22/22 at 10:00 AM, upon entering the kitchen's dry storage area, a swarm of flying insects were concentrated on and around the bread and bread cart in the middle of the storage room. Across the storage room there was a smaller swarm of flying insects centralized around bananas stored on a shelf. On 8/22/22 at 10:15 AM, V17 Dietary Manager and V20 Maintenance/Housekeeping Manager (while on kitchen tour) stated the facility has had problems with drain flies for about 2 months. We have had pest control in, but I am not sure what they have done in the storage area. On 8/23/22 at 9:15 AM, flying insects were in and around the bread cart. The food storage room has no drains, bug zappers lights, or other types of insect pest controls (fly traps) devices in it. On 8/23/22 at 10:10 AM, V21 Pest Control Representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure meal intakes were monitored and ordered interventions were followed through for a resident with significant weight loss, failed to initiate dietary recommendations for a resident with significant weight loss and failed to provide dietary supplements for residents with weight loss. This applies to 4 of 15 residents (R20, R21, R12, R26) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. R20's Physician Order Sheets (P.O.S.) dated through August 2022 shows she is a [AGE] year old female with diagnoses including esophgeal stricture, irritable bowel syndrome, cerebral infarct, dysphagia following cerebral infarct, encounter for attention for gastrostomy, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarct, and anxiety. The P.O.S. shows orders to give enteral feeding Jevity 1.5 if 50 % or less of meal consumed and hold if 50 % or more of meal consumed. R20's meal intake report from August 1, 2022 to August 23, 2022…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen was applied by a licensed professional as ordered and failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed as ordered for 5 of 8 residents (R12, R21, R26, R50 and R78) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. R21's Care Plan for oxygen shows, I am currently on O2 at 3L/NC Administer my O2 as MD ordered. The position for the intervention says registered nurse or licensed practical nurse. On 8/22/22 at 12:45 PM, V13, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) turned off R21's portable oxygen tank to transfer her to bed for care. R21 was provided care and transferred back to her chair. V13 turned the portable oxygen dial to 2 liters and applied the oxygen to R21. On 8/23/22 at 12:14 PM, V14, Registered Nurse (RN) said that CNA's can adjust the oxygen tubing but they should not be turning on the portable tanks and adjusting the liters of oxygen administered. V14 said that the orders should be checked and followed any time oxygen is administered. The facility's Oxygen Therapy Policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity, affecting one of twenty residents (R40) reviewed for dignity in the sample of twenty. The finding include: R40's Minimum Data Set, dated , July 1, 2022, shows, Brief Interview for Mental Status 15/15-Cognitively Intact. On 08/22/22 at 10:06 AM, R40 said, I asked V8 CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant to help me get out of bed. She became very irritated. She took my clothing out of the closet and threw them on my bed. She told me I was a racist; She said I was entitled. On 08/24/22 at 10:28 AM, R40 said, V8 CNA called me a racist. I asked her to help me get up. I reported it to the nurse on duty when it happened. I do not remember the date or the nurse that was working that day. I told the nurse when it happened. R40 said, when V8 CNA called me a racist and was speaking to me rudely I was bewildered. I had never treated her poorly. It was like she was having a bad day and decided to take it out on me. The way V8 CNA acted when calling me a racist made me feel bad. On 08/24/22 at 11:51…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to verify a resident's code status upon admission to ensure residents wishes were followed for 1 of 20 (R331) reviewed for advance directives in the sample of 12. The findings include: R331's admission Record dated 8/23/2022 shows an admission date of 8/15/2022. R331's admission Record dated 8/23/2022 does not have a code status listed under advance directives. R331's Order Summery Report as of 8/23/2022 does not have a code status order in place. On 8/24/2022 at 9:49, V3 Assistant Director of Nursing said the resident's code status should be addressed upon admission and their wishes should be entered in the computer charting system. V3 said the residents code status should match in all places. V3 said the resident's code status is found in the physician orders.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided perineal cleansing in a manner to prevent infections for a resident with a history of urinary tract infections. This applies to 1 of 4 residents (R60) reviewed for bladder services in the sample of 20. The findings include: R60's Physician Order Sheets dated through August 2022 shows she is an [AGE] year old female with diagnoses including history of urinary tract infections, dementia and acute cystitis. R60's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows her cognition is severely impaired, requires extensive assist for toileting and frequently incontinent. On 8/22/22 at 1:19 PM, V8 (CNA) transferred R60 from the wheelchair to the toilet using the mechanical stand lift and removed her soiled incontinent brief. V8 cleansed R60's perineal area from front to back and continued to use the same contaminated area of the wipe to cleanse her. V8 did not use a clean area of the wipe with each swipe. On 8/22/22 at 12:15 PM, V9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident on contact/droplet isolation remained in the room, and failed to perform hand hygiene and glove exchange during peri care to prevent cross contamination. This applies to 3 of 20 residents (R331, R78, R14) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1. R331's admission Record shows R331 being admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 8/22/2022 at 12:15AM, R331 was observed in the communal dining room with her mask off sitting at a table waiting for lunch to be served. There were other residents sitting in the same communal dining room as R331. On 8/22/2022 at 1:29PM, V11 Registered Nurse said R331 was on contact/droplet isolation precautions because she didn't have her boosters and wasn't up to date. V11 said R331 has been eating meals in the dining room. On 8/22/2022 at 1:51PM, V4 Infection Control Preventionist said R331 was on contact/droplet isolation precautions for 10 days because she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BULTAS, ANGELINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/1994 |
| FILIPELLO, LYNDA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2010 |
| MICHALEK, FRANK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/1998 |
| PEILER, ROBERT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2008 |
| PINDIAK, GLORIA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 11/01/2018 |
| TROY, AARON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/09/2017 |
| HARVAT, ANTHONY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 06/20/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145840. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.