Newman Rehab & Health Care Ctr
418 South Memorial Park Drive, Newman, IL 61942 · For profit - Individual · 60 certified beds · (217) 837-2421 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (73%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.3% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 73.9% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.7% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.2% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.0% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.3% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 40.9% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 46.5 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.46 on weekdays — 30% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to administer the accurate dose of a liquid concentration, of the physician ordered, Oxycodone (narcotic analgesic) medication. Subsequently, R90 was administered an excessive dose of Oxycodone, twenty times greater than prescribed. The significant medication administration error resulted in R90 experiencing depressed respirations, prolonged apnea episodes, unresponsiveness, and lethargy. R90 is one of one resident reviewed for Hospice/Pain management on the sample list of 20. Findings include: R90's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 7/17/23- 7/31/23 documents R90 was admitted on [DATE] on Hospice (care services for terminally ill). R90's same POS documents the following medication order dated 7/17/23: Oxycodone one milligram (mg) per one milliliter (ml), (concentration) oral solution, take five ml (equals five milligrams) by mouth every three hours as needed for pain (PRN). R90's same POS documents for the above medication, one mg per one ml, liquid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents dignity and respect for two (R3, R4) residents out of five residents reviewed in a sample list of nine residents.Findings include:1.R4's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents R4's medical diagnoses as Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage affecting right non-dominant side, Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, Cerebral Infarction, Anxiety and history of Trans Ischemic Attack (TIA).R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R4 as moderately cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R4 requires moderate assistance with transfers.R4's Care Plan intervention dated 3/13/25 documents R4 is totally dependent on one staff member for locomotion using a wheelchair.On 5/3/26 at 11:20 AM V11 [NAME] stated she witnessed V4 CNA use inappropriate language in front of R4. V11 [NAME] stated she was standing by R4's dinner table when V4 CNA walked up to R4 and stated in R4's ear Let's go to f…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of verbal and physical abuse to the abuse coordinator for two of five residents (R3, R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample list of nine residents. Findings include:1.R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3 is severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R3 requires moderate assistance for bed mobility, personal hygiene and is dependent on the assistance of staff for toileting and transfers. The facility report to the State Agency dated 4/30/26 documents V3 Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) reported an allegation of verbal and physical abuse of R3 by staff member V4 CNA on 4/29/26. This same report documents V3 CNA allegedly witnessed the incident on the evening of 4/28/26 and reported it to V7 Registered Nurse (RN) on the evening of 4/29/26. On 5/2/26 at 1:00 PM V7 Registered Nurse (RN) stated about three weeks ago (early to mid April) at 2 AM, she heard R3 screaming from down the hall, went to investigate and found V4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the Administrator and the State Agency for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for abuse in a sample list of five residents. Findings include: The facility Abuse Prevention Program revised 11/28/16 states The nursing staff is additionally responsible for reporting on a facility incident report the appearance of bruises, lacerations, other abnormalities, or injuries of unknown origin as they occur. Upon report of such occurrences, the Nursing Supervisor is responsible for assessing the resident, reviewing the documentation and reporting to the administrator or designee. This policy also documents, Final Investigation Report: The investigator will report the conclusions of the investigation in writing to the administrator or designee within five working days of the reported incident. The final investigation report shall contain the following: Name, age, diagnoses, and mental status of the resident allegedly abused or neglected; The original allegation (note day, time, location,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly and thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for abuse in a sample list of five residents. Findings include: The facility Abuse Prevention Program revised 11/28/16 states The nursing staff is additionally responsible for reporting on a facility incident report the appearance of bruises, lacerations, other abnormalities, or injuries of unknown origin as they occur. Upon report of such occurrences, the Nursing Supervisor is responsible for assessing the resident, reviewing the documentation and reporting to the administrator or designee. This policy also documents, Final Investigation Report: The investigator will report the conclusions of the investigation in writing to the administrator or designee within five working days of the reported incident. The final investigation report shall contain the following: Name, age, diagnoses, and mental status of the resident allegedly abused or neglected; The original allegation (note day, time, location, the specific…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) according to current standards of practice for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a sample list of five residents. Findings Include: R1's diagnoses list printed [DATE] at 2:52 PM includes the following diagnoses: Encephalopathy, Fall, Urinary Tract Infection, Cardiac Arrhythmia, Anticoagulant Use, Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Hyperlipidemia, Mild Dementia with Anxiety, Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Weakness, and Pressure Ulcers of both heels Stage II. R1's Hospital Discharge Orders dated [DATE] document R1 was hospitalized from [DATE] to [DATE] for Urinary Tract Infection with Sepsis and Metabolic Encephalopathy. R1's admission Progress Note documents R1 was admitted to the facility [DATE] with orders for Physical Therapy and Occupational Therapy with the intent of Rehabilitation to home. R1's POLST (Uniform Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified Director of Food and Nutrition. This failure has the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 9/15/24 at 8:16 AM, there were opened food items in the refrigerator that were not labeled with open dates and there were open food items in the dry storage room that were not labeled with open dates. At this same time there was dust and debris hanging directly above the cook top and the toaster was dirty with crumbs inside and around the outside. On 9/16/24 at 9:00 AM, V19 Dietary Manager stated that she is not a certified Dietary Manager. V19 stated that she has taken some courses but has not had time to complete all of the courses. The facility assessment dated [DATE] documents that a dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional will serve as the director of food and nutrition services. The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 9/15/24…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to properly label the open date on open food items, failed to have an internal thermometer in a refrigerator and failed to maintain the range hood and the toaster in sanitary conditions to protect food that was being prepared on the range and in the toaster. This failure has the potential to affect all 35 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's storage policy with a revised date of October 2020 documents, It is the policy of (the facility) that food shall be stored on shelves in areas that provide the best preservation. Food shall be stored at the proper temperature and for appropriate lengths of time to protect quality of food and food costs. Procedure: 1. All items will be dated upon receipt. Individual cans or bags shall each be dated to ensure that stock is rotated properly. 5. Store leftovers in covered, labeled and dated containers under refrigeration or frozen. 6. When using only part of a product, the remaining product should be in the original package or air tight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level require more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify high risk areas for Legionella and implement control measures. This failure has the potential to affect all 35 residents that reside in the facility. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment (PPE) properly during a COVID-19 (human coronavirus infection) outbreak. This failure affects eight of sixteen residents reviewed for infection control in the sample list of 25. Findings include: a.) The facility's undated Legionella Policy and Procedure, provided by V1 Administrator, documents Legionella is a bacterium that is common in the natural water system (ponds, [NAME], lochs, etc (etcetera)) and Legionella are widespread in the environment they may contaminate and grow in artificial water systems ( cooling towers, hot and cold water systems, storage tanks, pipe work, taps and showers).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was completed for two (R11, R10) of two residents reviewed for PASARR screening in the sample list of 25 residents. Findings include: 1.) The facility provided admission sheet dated 9/15/24 documents that R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R11's (State) Department of Healthcare and Family Services Interagency Certification of Screening Results sheet dated 10/6/11 documents that R11 should have further assessment to determine the need for a Level II screening. R11's September 2024 physician order sheet documents a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and an order for Buspirone (antidepressant) 5milligrams daily. R11's Care Plan dated 3/18/24 documents diagnoses including Anxiety, Depression, and Schizoaffective Disorder with behaviors that include inappropriate sexual remarks to staff and visitors, demanding/attention seeking behaviors, false accusations and resistance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record the facility failed to initiate care plans to include resident centered problems, goals, and interventions for one (R11) of 16 residents for care plans from a sample list of 25 residents. Findings include: The facility Comprehensive Care Planning Policy dated 7/20/22 documents that the care plan will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The comprehensive care plan shall be revised as necessary to reflect the resident's current medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. On 9/15/24 at 9:19AM, R11's right hand was contracted. R11 said that she has hand splints to prevent contracting and that she wants to wear them but the girls forget to put them on. No splints were in R11's hands at this time. On 9/16/24 at 10:45AM, V21 Licensed Practical Nurse found a right hand splint and hand roll in R11's bedside drawer. On 9/16/24 at 10:47AM, V5 Certified Nursing Assistant stated R11 had her hand roll in her right hand this morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide hygienic incontinence and urinary catheter care to prevent cross contamination for two (R12, R18) of four residents reviewed for urinary care in the sample list of 25. Findings include: 1.) R12's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R12 has severe cognitive impairment, is always incontinent of bowel and bladder, and is dependent on staff assistance for toileting hygiene. On 9/16/24 at 2:33 PM V11 and V12 Certified Nursing Assistants transferred R12 into bed with a full mechanical lift and R12 was incontinent of urine. V12 provided R12's incontinence cares starting with R12's buttocks. V12 wiped R12's buttocks three times with wash cloths and bowel movement was visible on the cloths. V12 turned R12 onto R12's back, and used wash cloths to cleanse R12's frontal perineal area using the same gloves worn to cleanse R12's buttocks. V12 did not change gloves until after V12 applied R12's clean incontinence brief. On 9/16/24 at 2:49 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow facility policy and document/record the daily amount of enteral feeding administered to a resident for one of one resident (R18) reviewed for Gastrostomy tube feedings in the sample list of 25. Findings include: The facility's Enteral Feeding policy with a revised date of February/2008 documents, Purpose: To ensure a safe, nutritionally appropriate product which provides a source of complete nutrition in a form that will pass through a tube into the digestive system and which will maintain nutritional status as designated. 1. The Dietician/Consultant will monitor all diet orders for tube feedings and will recommend as appropriate changes in product according to resident need. 4. The fluid intake for the resident receiving a tube feeding should be equivalent to the fluid needs as assessed by the Dietician. Fluid need not be met by product alone in which case water flush ordered may be recommended to meet the needs of the tube fed resident. A record of daily intake of the tube feeding and the flushes for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain consents, complete assessments, document nonpharmacological interventions, develop a care plan and document stop dates for psychotropic medications for two (R10, R12) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample list of 25. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Policy dated 12/30/13 documents to attempt to rule out social and environmental factors as causes for behaviors, initiate a Pre-Psychotropic Medication Assessment, attempt nonpharmacological interventions prior to prescribing psychotropic medications, and obtain consent for psychotropic medication use from the resident or resident representative. This policy documents psychotropic medication assessments will be completed at least quarterly, and psychotropic medication use, potential side effects and targeted behaviors will be included in the resident's plan of care. This policy does not address stop dates for psychotropic medications ordered to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store and secure controlled medications behind a separately locked compartment for three (R10, R12 and R23) of three residents reviewed for medication storage from a total sample list of 25 residents. Findings include: The facility provided Procurement and Storage of Medications Policy date reviewed October 2006, documents that Schedule II drugs are to be stored under a double-lock subject to a different key. On 9/16/24 at 3:03PM, an unlocked refrigerator contained five bottles of Lorazepam (schedule IV controlled substance) 30 milliliters, with a concentration of 2 milligrams per milliliter. One bottle was documented for R23, three bottles were documented for R12 and one bottle was documented for R10. On 9/16/24 at 3:04PM, V3 Registered Nurse stated the refrigerator should have been locked because it had Lorazepam in it. On 9/16/24 at 3:06PM, V2 Director of Nursing observed that the refrigerator housing five bottles of Lorazepam was unlocked and confirmed that the refrigerator should have been locked.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain documentation of COVID-19 vaccination for three (R9, R19, R36) of five residents reviewed for immunizations in the sample list of 25. Findings include: The facility's Immunization of Residents policy dated 5/19/23 documents the facility will offer immunizations to aid in preventing infectious diseases. This policy documents to offer the current recommended COVID-19 vaccine upon admission for residents who are not considered up to date with the vaccine, review consent forms to verify timing of previous vaccinations and document immunizations on the resident's Immunization Record. 1.) R9's Face Sheet documents R9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and R9 is over age [AGE]. R9's Cumulative Diagnosis Log documents R9's diagnoses include Congestive Heart Failure, Coronary Artery Disease, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. R9's COVID-19 Vaccination Record Card documents vaccine administrations on 2/4/21, 3/4/21, 11/4/21, and 6/29/22. There is no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure therapy services were provided for two (R1 and R3) of three residents reviewed for therapy services in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's admission Packet (current) documents the following information: Dear Residents and Family Members: Our facility offers services that may be covered by the Medicare Program. These services include skilled nursing care, therapy services, pharmacy, and medical supplies. If you have Medicare benefits and you or a family member consents, we will bill the Medicare program for services that are rendered at this facility. 1. R1's Face Sheet (current) documents R1 being admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's Therapy Evaluation and Treatment order dated 1/22/24 per Physician Order Sheet (POS) documents R1 is to receive Therapeutic Treatment for Neurological Re-Education, Gait Training, Group Therapy and Therapeutic Activities 2 times a week for 4 weeks (ending on 2/23/24). R1 is also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to designate a qualified director of food and nutrition services. This failure has the potential to affect 38 out of 39 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 8/8/23 at 9:41 am, V3, Director of Food and Nutrition Services (Dietary Manager) was actively managing and directing the services of the facility's kitchen and staff preparing residents food. On 8/8/23 at 9:50 am, V3 exhibited a Certified Food Protection Manager certificate, valid through 8/12/24. V3 stated this certificate was achieved from an 8 hour course in food sanitation. V3 stated she is a high school graduate, does not have a Certified Dietary Manager certificate, nor a Certified Food Protection Professional certificate. V3 stated she is not a Registered Dietician. V3 also stated she did not meet any of the state requirements for a Dietetic Service Supervisor by stating she is [AGE] years old so has had no courses prior to 1990 and does not have any military…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food and food service utensils in a manner to prevent cross contamination of residents food. This failure has the potential to affect 38 of 39 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 8/7/23 at 9:15 am, there was a 10 pound package of ground beef thawing in the reach-in refrigerator. This thawing ground beef was stored above a package of hard boiled eggs. On 8/8/23 at 9:45 am, V3, Dietary Manager, stated, That meat shouldn't have been above the eggs. On 8/8/23 at 9:50 am, there was a bulk container of flour in the facility's dry food storage room. Inside this bulk container was a foam cup, approximately 12 ounces, laying in direct contact with the flour. On 8/8/23 at 9:50 am, V3 stated, That cup should is not supposed to be left inside the container. The facility's policy Storage dated 10/2020 documents, Do not leave any serving utensils or tools in food containers. The facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 8/7/23 documents 39 residents reside in the facility, all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide alternate meals to residents that did not eat what was served/or requested a substitute menu item. This failure affected five R9, R11, R17, R32, and R89 reviewed during resident group on the sample list of 20. Findings include: On 08/08/23 at 1:30 PM during a group meeting, residents stated the following: R9, stated the facility does not offer a substitution menu. R11 stated there are no substitute food items every available. R11 also stated R11 has asked several times. R17, stated there are no alternate menu items available during meals. R32 stated there are no substitutes offered for meals. R32 stated R32 sees many residents (unidentified) that can't speak for themselves, that don't eat what is served. Staff (unidentified) just remove the residents plate and do not offer anything else. R89 stated there are no substitutes for meals. Everybody gets whatever the facility wants to serve. R89 also stated R89 has asked staff (unidentified) and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify resident's family and physician of changes in condition for two (R25, R31) of 16 residents reviewed for change in condition in the sample list of 20. Findings include: The facility's Notification for Change in Resident Condition or Status dated 7/1/23 documents the nurse will notify the resident's representative/family and physician when there has been a change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition, a need to alter medical treatment, symptoms of infection, abnormal lab results, and weight loss of 5% in 30 days and 7.5% in 90 days. 1.) R25's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R25 has severe cognitive impairment. R25's May 2023 POS documents an order dated 5/25/23 for a urinalysis with culture and sensitivity and an order dated 5/30/23 for Nitrofurantoin (antibiotic) 100 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 12 hours for 5 days. R25's Urine Culture with reported date of 5/30/23 documents R25's urine contained Proteus Mirabilis…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately encode three falls, on three different minimum data set assessments for a resident. The facility also failed to make corrections on the minimum data sets regarding residents falls, as directed by the facility policy. This failure affects one resident (R16) out of four residents reviewed for accident hazard/falls on the sample list of 20. Findings include: On 08/07/23 at 10:30 am, R16 was seated in a recliner next to her bed. R16 had deep purple, full facial bruising, below and above both eyes, chin, right side of her nose and her left cheek from a fall on 8/3/23. R16 stated R16 has had four falls from bed, which resulted in fractured left collarbone, and stitches in her head from those falls. 1. On 8/7/23 at 10:40 am V1, Administrator provided an Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) reportable fall on 2/5/23. This report documents R16 sustained a Left Clavicle fracture (major injury) from attempting to get out of bed. 2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update comprehensive care plans for three residents (R2, R26, R31) of 12 residents reviewed for care plans in a sample list of 20. The facility failed to update care plans in four care areas (accidents, nutrition, anticoagulant, urinary catheter). Findings include: 1.) R2's Final report of incident dated 4/29/23 documents (R2) is independent with ambulation was found on the floor in her bedroom and sent to the emergency room for evaluation and treatment. (The facility was) notifies today of closed compression fracture of L3 and L5 Lumbar Vertebrae. R2's Care Plan includes an entry dated 6/8/22 documenting Falls: Risk factors Include: Hip Replacement, Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Psychotropic Medication Use. The only updated intervention for falls since 6/8/22 is dated 4/14/23 and document Nonskid Strips in front of the toilet. The facility's policy Fall Prevention revised 11/10/18 states Immediately after any resident fall the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with shaving/grooming for two (R19, R25) of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in the sample list of 20. Findings include: 1.) On 8/07/23 at 9:30 AM R19 was sitting in a wheelchair in R19's room. R19 had long, dark, facial hair to R19's upper lip, chin, and cheeks. At 12:11 PM R19 was sitting in the dining room and had long, dark, facial hair. On 8/8/23 at 9:48 AM R19 was sitting in R19's room and had long dark facial hair to R19's upper lip, chin, and cheek. R19 made a shaving motion to R19's face and nodded yes when asked if R19 preferred to be shaved. At 3:34 PM R19 still had long, dark facial hair. R19's August 2023 Physician's Order Summary documents R19's has diagnoses of Self Care - Total Deficit, and history of intercranial injury and traumatic birth injury. R19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R19 requires extensive assistance of one staff for personal hygiene. 2.) On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to clean a wound during a wound treatment and label a dressing with a date for one resident (R31) reviewed for wounds in the sample list of 20. Findings include: R31's Physician Progress Notes dated 8/7/23 and recorded by V21 Podiatrist, documents R31's full thickness burn wound of the lower leg daily treatment order as collagen moistened with saline, cut to fit the wound, apply petroleum jelly dressing, cover with dry gauze, wrap with rolled gauze, and apply an elastic dressing to secure. This note documents to cleanse the wound with saline and the wound measured 10.5 centimeters (cm) by 2 cm by 0.1 cm. On 8/9/23 at 10:39 AM V22 Licensed Practical Nurse administered R31's wound treatment. V22 removed the undated dressing from R31's right outer calf wound. The wound was linear and had red/pink tissue. V22 did not cleanse the wound prior to applying the wound treatment of saline moistened collagen, petroleum jelly dressing, gauze dressing, and rolled gauze. V22 labeled the dressing with a date. At 11:02 AM V22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label a pressure ulcer dressing with a date, implement pressure relieving interventions, and implement a treatment order for one resident (R31) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample list of 20. Findings include: R31's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R31 has severe cognitive impairment, 4 unstageable pressure ulcers present on admission, requires extensive assistance of one staff for bed mobility, and requires dependence on two staff for transfers. R31's Care Plan initiated on 6/25/23 documents R31 is at high risk for pressure ulcers and includes an intervention to notify the physician of any open or bruised areas. There is an intervention dated 2/24/23 to refer to the Physician's Order Summary for current wound treatment orders and interventions dated 3/6/23 to check right heel every 2 hours, air mattress, and heel protector boots. There is no documentation of any new pressure relieving interventions for R31's heels after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for residents at risk for falls, failed to care plan a targeted intervention post fall, failed to investigate an improper transfer of a resident and implement interventions to prevent improper transfers. This failure affects three of four residents (R4, R16, R239) reviewed for accidents/falls on the sample list of 20. Findings include: 1. R4's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 8/1/23- 8/31/23 documents the following diagnoses Chronic Back Pain, Kyphosis, Spinal Stenosis, History of Stroke, and Restless Leg Syndrome. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents the following: R4's Brief Interview of Mental Status score of nine, out of possible 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS documents R4 requires extensive physical staff assist of one person with bed mobility, is totally dependent of two staff for transfers, and has bilateral lower extremity impairment in range of motions. R4 Fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely report urine culture results to the physician and timely implement antibiotic orders for one resident (R26) reviewed for Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) in the sample list of 20. Findings include: On 08/07/23 at 2:48 PM V8 (R26's Family) stated R26 gets frequent UTIs and one time R26's urine sample was collected on a Friday and the results were not available until Thursday. V8 stated that day an unidentified nurse told V8 that a prescription was ordered, and the medication would be delivered that night. R26's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R26 has severe cognitive impairment. R26's Care Plan dated 3/15/23 documents R26 has bladder incontinence and includes interventions to notify the physician of symptoms of UTIs. R26's Urine Culture collected on 5/24/23 and reported on 5/27/23 documents Proteus Mirabilis (bacteria) greater than 100,000 Colony Forming Units (CFU). This lab result includes a handwritten order dated 5/29/23 for Levaquin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer nutritional supplements as ordered, failed to document nutritional supplement intakes, and failed to timely identify significant weight loss and report significant weight loss to the physician and dietitian for two (R31, R2) residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 20. This failure resulted in R31 experiencing a significant weight loss of 13.53% in 90 days. Findings include: The facility's Resident Weight Monitoring policy dated as revised March 2019 documents the following: Monthly weights are to be obtained by the 5th of each month. The Dietary Manager and Director of Nursing are responsible for reviewing the monthly weights by the 8th of each month. The Food Service Manager and interdisciplinary team review weights, nutritional status, and make recommendations for nutritional interventions. The physician and dietitian will be notified of significant weight loss of 5% or more in one month, 7.5 % or more in three…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess at least quarterly, document nonpharmacological interventions, and obtain informed consent for one resident (R2) who receives psychotropic medication of five residents reviewed for psychotropic medications in a sample list of 20 residents. Findings Include: R2's Physician's Order Sheet (POS) for August 1st, 2023, through August 31st, 2023, includes the following current physician's orders for psychotropic medication: Citalopram (Antidepressant) 40 milligrams daily. 2. Risperdal (Antipsychotic) 2 milligrams twice daily. 3. Geodon (antipsychotic) 60 milligrams twice daily. 4. Trazadone (antidepressant) 50 milligrams twice daily. and 5. Melatonin (sleep aid) 3 milligrams at bedtime daily. The most recent assessment for R2's citalopram, Risperdal, and Geodon are dated 4/7/23. There are no documented assessments for R2's Trazadone or Melatonin. The dosage on R2's consent for Trazadone is documented as 25 milligrams. The current dosage being administered is 50 milligrams twice daily. There is no documentation to support…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to designate a Registered Nurse to serve as the Director of Nursing. This failure has the potential to affect all 43 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 8/9/22 at 9:30 am, V1, Administrator, stated, We do not have a Director of Nursing at this time. We do not have anyone acting as Director of Nursing. The facility's Quality Assurance Committee sign in sheets dated for 1/19/22, 4/20/22, and 7/20/22, have a blank line where a D.O.N. (Director of Nursing) should have signed. The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documents the facility requires the services of a Registered Nurse as full time Director of Nursing to provide competent support and care for the resident population, documented as 40% of the residents require skilled rehabilitation, 11% special high care, 8% clinically complex, 10% IV medications, and 75% isolation or quarantine for active infectious disease. On 8/10/22 at 4:15 pm, V4, MDS Coordinator/ Licensed Practical Nurse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a sanitary manner and failed to store food products with documented dates of opening packages and dates to discard opened food items. This failure has the potential to affect nearly all 43 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: 1) On 8/9/22 at 10:27 am, the facility's ice machine, located in the facility kitchen, had thick encrusted mineral deposits streaking on multiple surfaces, and there was a pink slime substance on the plastic ice discharge chute on the interior of the ice machine (direct contact with the ice). V15, Dietary Manager, obtained a clean hand towel and wiped pink substance congealed onto the hand towel in a 1 inch area of thick red gelatinous residue. On 8/9/22 at 10:27 am, V15, Dietary Manager, stated, What is that. I suppose it doesn't matter what it is, it's dirty. On 8/11/22 at 1:58 pm, V15 stated, The ice machine is the only ice machine in the building. Every resident gets ice from that machine with the exception of 1 resident who is nothing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-08-11 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to include a minimum required member, the Director of Nursing, in their Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee for the past three quarterly meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 43 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 8/9/22 at 9:30 am, V1, Administrator, stated, We do not have a Director of Nursing at this time. We do not have anyone acting as Director of Nursing. The facility's Quality Assurance Committee sign in sheets dated for 1/19/22, 4/20/22, and 7/20/22, have a blank line where a D.O.N. (Director of Nursing) should have signed as attending the meeting. The facility assessment dated [DATE] documents the facility requires the services of a Registered Nurse as full time Director of Nursing. The facility Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 8/9/22 documents 43 residents reside in the facility.
- Potential for harm · E2022-08-11 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete quarterly assessments not less frequently than once every three months. This failure affects seven residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R6, R8, and R12) out of nine reviewed for assessments on the sample list of 29. Findings include: 1) R1's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documents this MDS was transmitted as completed on 8/5/22. R1's previous quarterly MDS was dated 3/10/22. On 8/9/22 at 3:51 pm, V4, MDS Coordinator, stated and confirmed, I transmitted (R1's) most recent quarterly MDS on 8/5/22 and (R1's) previous MDS was dated 3/10/22. 2) R2's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set documents this MDS was transmitted as completed on 8/5/22. R2's previous quarterly MDS was dated 3/15/22. On 8/9/22 at 3:51 pm, V4, MDS Coordinator, stated and confirmed, I transmitted (R2's) most recent quarterly MDS on 8/5/22 and (R2's) previous quarterly MDS was dated 3/15/22. 3) R3's most recent quarterly MDS was dated as completed on 8/6/22 but had not yet been transmitted. R3's previous quarterly MDS was dated 3/16/22. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-11 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete required comprehensive assessments within 14 days after admission, and annually. This failure affects two residents (R5 and R135) out of nine reviewed for assessments on the sample list of 29. Findings include: 1) R5's most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents this MDS was an annual assessment. There was not a subsequent annual MDS in R5's medical record as of 8/9/22. On 8/10/22 at 3:51 pm, V4, Minimum Data Set Coordinator, stated, I am currently working on (R5's) annual comprehensive MDS which was due in June (2022). (R5's) last annual was done on 6/14/21. 2) The facility's Form 802 Matrix dated 8/9/22 documents R135 was admitted to the facility 7/7/22. R135's Profile Sheet confirms R135's admission date of 7/7/22, as does R135's Nursing admission Sheet. R135 did not have a completed comprehensive initial MDS in the medical record as of 8/10/22. On 8/10/22 at 2:50 pm, V4, Minimum Data Set Coordinator,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a Comprehensive Plan of Care for R135. R135 is one of one resident reviewed as a new admission on the sample list of 29. Findings include: R135's Profile Sheet documents a facility admit date of 7/7/22. R135's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated August 2022 includes the following medical diagnoses: Acute Cerebral Vascular Accident, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, Anxiety, and Chronic Kidney Disease (Stage III). R135's Baseline Care Plan, dated 7/7/22 was located in the Medical Record, however, there was no Comprehensive Care Plan in the Medical Record for staff guidance in the ongoing care of R135. On 8/10/22 at 3:20 pm, V4, Care Plan Coordinator, confirmed R135's Comprehensive Plan of Care had not been completed, along with R135's Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI). V4 stated I am behind on RAI's and Care Plans and (R135) is one of them that I have not got to yet. V4 confirmed R135's Comprehensive Care Plan was due no later than 7/28/22. The facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Planning dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions according to resident's care plans. This failure affects two residents (R1 and R11) out of five reviewed for falls on the sample list of 29. Findings include: 1) On 8/9/22 at 1:19 pm, R11 was seated in a wheelchair in the facility dining room. R11 did not have a personal alarm on the wheelchair. On 8/10/22 at 11:57 am, R11 was seated in the facility dining room in a wheelchair. There was not a personal alarm in the wheelchair for R11. R11's Care Plan for fall prevention documents R11 slid out of the wheelchair on 7/3/22 and a post fall intervention was documented for a personal alarm for R11 while R11 is in the wheelchair, dated as initiated 7/3/22. R11's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R11 received 22 points with a score of 10 or more being rated as high risk for falls. On 8/10/22 at 12:38 pm, V4, Minimum Data Set/ Care Plan Coordinator, stated, The alarm is a current intervention for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide nutrition, according to Dietician recommendations and physician orders, through a gastrostomy tube for a resident experiencing weight loss. This failure affects one resident (R19) out of four reviewed for nutrition on the sample list of 29. Findings include: On 8/9/22 at 10:25 am, R19 was in bed with a gastrostomy tube feeding pump delivering Fibersource HN 1.2 (tube feeding product) at 70 cubic centimeters (cc's) per hour to R19 through R19's gastrostomy tube. At 2:47 pm, R19 remained in bed with the gastrostomy tube feeding pump delivering Fibersource HN 1.2 to R19 at the same 70 cc's per hour. R19's Dietary Services Communication dated 7/21/22 documents R19 had lost 3 pounds in the past month, and 7 pounds in the last 3 months. This same Dietary Services Communication documents R19's gastrostomy tube feeding rate on 7/21/22 was 70 cc's per hour for 20 hours per day and documented a recommendation from the Registered Dietician (V5) to increase R19's tube feeding to 75 cc's per hour for 20 hours per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete Quarterly Psychotropic Medication Assessments and failed to complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movements Scale (AIMS). This failure effected one of five residents (R10) reviewed for Psychotropic Medications on the sample list of 29. Findings include: R10's Physician Order Sheet dated August 2022 documents R10 is diagnosed with Dementia, Major Depression, and Schizoaffective Disorder Mixed Type. R10 is prescribed Citalopram (Antidepressant) 40 milligrams once per day, Risperidone (Antipsychotic) 2 milligrams two times daily, and Geodon (Antipsychotic) 40 milligrams with breakfast and 60 milligrams with dinner. R10's Citalopram, Risperidone, and Geodon Psychotropic Medication Quarterly Evaluations dated 6/13/22 were the only quarterly evaluations the facility completed within the last year. R10's AIMS (Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale) dated 6/8/22 and 7/18/22 were the only AIMS completed for R10's Antipsychotic medications Risperidone or Geodon within the last year. The facility's Psychotropic Medication Policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-04 for 26 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOND, TAUREN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 33% | since 12/01/2024 |
| SMITH, CHRISTINA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 33% | since 12/01/2024 |
| TOSSELL, LANCE | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| ONEEIGHTY SOLUTIONS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| CLARK, KELLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| MELVIN, ANTOINETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2025 |
| ZAMAN, ASAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| NIEUKIRK, MATTHEW | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $176K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145631. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.