Central Baptist Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 41.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 86.1 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.03 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.87 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.82 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.21 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-15 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy to the resident and/or resident representative at the time of transfer to the hospital or within 24 hours of transfer for two (R1, R2) of three residents reviewed for hospital transfers; the facility also failed to complete a discharge summary/recapitulation of stay when R1 and R2 did not return to the facility and were discharged from the facility.Findings include:R1's face sheet documented R1 was Medicare Part A on 04/30/26. R1 was transferred to a local hospital on [DATE]. A physician progress note dated 04/30/26 documented, Patient being transferred to the acute hospital for evaluation of abdominal abscess as the abdomen is getting bigger and hardening. She has stable pain in the abdomen without worsening. Review of R1's clinical record revealed no documented bed-hold notice was provided to R1 and/or R1's representative at the time of transfer to the hospital or within 24 hours of transfer.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene when providing resident care and failed to ensure staff adhered to Enhanced Barrier Precautions. This applies to 6 of 6 (R3, R4, R6, R44, R81, and R8) residents reviewed for infection control in a sample of 25. Findings include: 1. [DATE] at 11:00 AM, V14 (CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant) and V18 (CNA) provided morning care to R6. R6 had a supra-pubic catheter draining urine into the urine bag. V14 emptied the urine from the urine drainage bag into a urinal. After emptying, V14 did not clean the spout and replaced it in its slot. After discarding the urine into the toilet, V14 removed his gloves, did not perform hand hygiene and put on another pair of gloves. V14 opened R6's soiled diaper, and while wearing the same gloves, reached into his pockets and pulled out a roll of plastic bags, tore off two bags, and placed the roll back in his pockets. V14 turned R6 to her right side, held by V18 (CNA), and wiped off stool…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist residents with feeding in a dignified manner.This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R56, R83, and R79) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 25. Findings include:1. On 8/05/2025 at 12:50 PM, V7 (Registered Nurse/RN) was assisting R56 with her meal in the dining room. V7 mixed R56's served pureed entree food items together. V7 proceeded to feed R56 her mixed pureed meal.On 8/07/2025 at 8:50 AM, R56 was in bed. V8 (RN) was standing over R56 and assisting her with her meal. V8 mixed R56's served pureed entree food items together. V8 said R56 was served eggs, hash brown, and an unknown brownish food item. V8 said R56 consumed 50 % of the main entree.R56's care plan reviewed on 8/07/2025, said R56 was cognitively impaired and required physical staff assistance with eating. R56's care plan did not include mixing all R56's different pureed foods together for meals.2. On 8/05/2025 at 12:20 PM, R83 was in the dining room for lunch. R83 was exhibiting increased anxiety. R83 was attempting to grab her pureed meal items.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide ADL (Activities of Daily Living) cares for residents who require assistance with their ADLs.This applies to 2 out of 2 residents (R5 and R64) reviewed ADLs in a sample of 25.The findings include:Findings include: 1. On 8/05/2025 at 10:58 AM, R64 was sitting in her wheelchair in the hallway right outside of her room. Her call light was going off. R64 was observed crying. R64, stated, I have to go to the bathroom, but my roommate is in our bathroom. R64 stated she pressed the call light and is waiting for staff to clean her up but she herself has been waiting a long time to be taken to the bathroom. R64 stated It's been a while I really have to go .I can't wait any longer .someone came and then left .I think I'm going in my pants. At 11:35 AM, R64 was in the day room. Her hair was greasy and not combed. She had hair strands above her lip. R64 said she was blind and wanted the whiskers above her lip shaved. R64 stated staff didn't comb her hair today and staff didn't brush her teeth either when they got…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply left and right palm protectors as ordered by physician.This applies to 1 resident (R76) reviewed for range of motion and contractures in a sample of 25.The findings include:On 8/6/25 at 11:41 AM R76 was observed sitting in large activity room with no palm protector on her right hand. Her right hand was closed with fingers extended against palm. On 8/6/25 at 11:46 AM, V8 (LPN/Licensed Practical Nurse) was asked if R76 had an order for palm protectors. V8 said he was not sure and V7 (RN/Registered Nurse) was R76's nurse. On 8/6/25 at 11:49 AM V7 was observed removing R76 from the dining room. V7 (RN) said the CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) forgot to put R76's palm protectors on this morning. On 8/6/25 at 11:58 AM, V7 wheeled R76 back into dining room for lunch and pointed out to surveyor that she put both R76's left and right palm protector on. Both R76's left and right palm protectors remained on throughout lunch service. On 8/6/25 at 2:19 PM, V12 (CNA) said she was taking care of R76, and it was her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide catheter care in a manner to prevent urinary tract infections for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. This applies to 1 resident (R8) reviewed for urinary catheters in a sample of 25.The findings include:R8's Face Sheet shows the following diagnoses: flaccid neuropathic bladder, personal history of urinary tract infections, retention of urine, and dementia. R8's POS (Physician Order Sheet) showed a 3/21/2024 order of catheter care (clean catheter with soap and water. Start at entry site. Clean catheter every incontinence episode).On 8/6/25 at 12:24 PM, R8 was in her wheelchair in the dining room. R8's urinary catheter drainage bag was in a privacy bag under her wheelchair. The privacy bag was dragging on the floor and had a dried-up white stain on it across the entire width of the bag, about halfway up the bag. On 8/7/25 at 9:50 AM, R8's catheter care was performed by V13 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant). V13 emptied R8's drainage bag. R8's urinary catheter privacy bag was attached to her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to aspirate gastric contents to check the placement of a resident's gastrostomy tube (GT). This applies to 1 of 1 (R3) residents reviewed for GT care in a sample of 25.Findings include:On 8/5/25 at 1:40 PM, V17 RN (Registered Nurse) used a large syringe and pushed 10-15 ml of air through R3's GT and auscultated her abdomen to check the placement of the tubing.On 8/6/25 at 11:23 AM, V10 (RN) used a large syringe and pushed 15 ml air into the GT and auscultated R3's abdomen with a stethoscope. V10 stated she heard the gurgling sound of the air being pushed in. V10 then pushed 160 ml water with the syringe into the GT as per orders. V10 stated the facility had taught them to check for GT placement in this manner.R3's 4/24/2025 care plan showed, check for tube placement and gastric contents prior to beginning feeding. R3's physician orders showed a 4/6/25 order to check G-tube placement before feeding and medication administration every shift.On 8/7/25 at 12:30 PM V2 (DON-Director of Nursing) stated facility has not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 30 opportunities with 3 errors resulting in a 10% error rate. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R17) observed in medication pass.The findings include:Findings include:On 08/06/2025 at 9:20 AM, V10 (Registered Nurse/RN) prepared R17's 8:00 AM scheduled medications. R17's prepared medications did not include tablets of spironolactone 25 mg (milligram) tablet, vitamin B12 1000 mcg (microgram) tablet, or the furosemide 40 mg tablet. V10 said she forgot to include the medications as ordered. On 08/07/2025 11:50 AM, V4 (Assistant Director of Nursing) said nurses received medication administration training routinely to ensure safe administration of medications. V4 said V10 should have checked R17's EMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) to ensure all scheduled medications were prepared and administered as ordered. On 08/07/2025 11:25 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said nurses were expected to check medication rights prior to administering medications to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the required staff assistance for bed mobility and ambulation for dependent residents as per the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment. This applies to 2 of the 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for resident falls and injuries in a sample of 3. The Findings Include: 1. R1 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted on the dementia floor on 8/18/22 with an admitting diagnosis, including vascular dementia and multiple sclerosis. On 12/31/24 at 9:25 AM, R1 was observed in her bed and was unable to move her lower extremities except wiggling toes. On 12/31/24 at 9:25 AM, R1 stated, I had a fall to the right side of my bed. My leg didn't move the way I want to. I don't remember what my CNA was doing at that time. A review of R1's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] document that R1 is high risk for fall. A review of the R1's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care plan document interventions including the resident requires physical assistance by staff to turn…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and track HCP (Health Care Providers) covid test results during a covid outbreak in accordance with their policy. This applies to all 102 residents who reside in the facility. The findings include: The form 671 completed on August 12, 2024, showed a facility census of 102. Upon annual survey entrance conference on August 12, 2024, at 9:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated there are 16 covid positive residents on the second floor. On August 14, 2024, at 10:17 AM, V3 (IP-Infection Preventionist)) stated R66 tested positive for covid on August 8, 2024, and was tested by a nurse on the second-floor unit due to displaying symptoms of covid. V3 was unable to provide testing results of HCP (Health Care Providers) who were exposed to R66. V3 stated in response to R66 positive test results, all the residents on the second floor were tested for covid, but HCPs tested themselves and V3 did not have any documentation to validate HCP testing. V3 provided a list of staff who had tested positive for covid, titled Staff Syndromic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL