La Salle County Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 67.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-08-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify a severe weight loss and put interventions in place for one (R33) of one resident reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 27. This failure resulted in R33 having a continued severe weight loss of 10.2% in one month and 12.9% loss in six months. Findings include: The facility's Resident Weight policy, dated 7/1/18, documents Any significant weight discrepancy from the previous weight is to be investigated at that time to rule out errors in weighing the resident (scale errors, incorrect procedure.) The nurse will report significant weight gains or losses to the physician and to the dietary department. (Significant weight gains or losses are defined as 5% in one month, 7.5% in 3 months, or 10% in 6 months. The Monthly Weight Summary for R33, documents the following weights: 8/15/24 at 128.0 pounds; 8/6/24 at 132.0 pounds; 7/3/24 at 147.0 pounds; 6/4/24 at 144.4 pounds; 5/2/24 at 148.0 pounds; 4/8/24 at 146.0 pounds; 3/12/24 at 145.0 pounds; and 2/12/24 at 147.0 pounds. This weight record documents a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-03-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement fall interventions for a resident at risk for falls for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of three. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing an unwitnessed fall, subsequently sustaining a left hip fracture requiring surgical repair. Findings include: R1's admission Fall Risk Assessment, dated 2/2/24 documents that R1 is at risk for falls. R1's Baseline Care Plan, dated 2/2/24, documents that R1 requires one-person physical assist for locomotion on the unit. This form documents that R1 is cognitively impaired. R1's baseline care plan does not have fall or safety interventions in place. R1's Restorative/Rehabilitation Evaluation, dated 2/2/24, documents that R1 requires extensive assist of one person for transfers. R1's Progress Notes, dated 2/11/24 at 6:45am, documents that R1 was awake at 4:15am. R1 was assisted to bed, but got out of bed. R1 was taken to the bathroom and fluids were offered, will continue to monitor. R1's Progress Notes, dated 2/12/24, documents that at 8:30pm, V4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their emergency menu. This applies to 4 of 6 (R1, R4, R5, R6) in the sample of 6. The findings include: On 2/10/2025 at 9:26AM and 10:15AM, R1 said on Wednesday 1/29/2025 the kitchen wasn't working. R1 said he was served graham crackers and peanut butter for breakfast. R1 said he received two packages of crackers for breakfast. R1 said he was still hungry, and breakfast didn't have enough food to fill him up. On 2/10/2025 at 10:44AM, R4 said he remembers Wednesday 1/29/2025 being served 2 packages (4 crackers) for breakfast that day. R4 said he doesn't recall being hungry after breakfast. On 2/10/2025 at 9:47AM, V5 (Kitchen Manager) said on Monday 1/27/2025 through Wednesday 1/29/2025 said the kitchen had electrical issues and the facility was on emergency meals for three days. V5 said the breakfast while on the emergency meal plan included graham crackers and the residents should have received six graham crackers or three packages of graham crackers each. On 2/10/2025 at 10:05AM and 1:02PM, V7 (Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to date opened food items, use items within the opened date timeframe, and failed to implement the cleaning schedule of equipment. This has the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Food Storage: Cold Foods, revised 04/2018, documents that all foods will be stored wrapped or in covered containers, labeled and dated, and arranged in a manner to prevent cross contamination. The facility's Equipment policy, revised 09/2017, documents that all food service equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order. This form also documents that all food contact equipment will be cleaned and sanitized after every use. This form documents that all non-foods contact equipment will be clean and free of debris. On 8/12/24 at 9:00am there were four plastic containers of open, undated cereal on the counter. V4 (Dietary Manager) stated that the cereal is supposed to be dated when it is opened and put into the containers. V4 stated that it is only good for seven…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0868 — widespread
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all required staff attended the facility's Quality Assurance Meetings. This has the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) last modified 6-20-18, documents Procedures: 1) The facility will maintain, at all times including staff transitions, a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee which will meet at least quarterly and more frequently according to the facility's needs. The committee will consist of at least the following: 1. The QAPI officer. 2. The Medical Director of this facility. 3. The Administrator of this facility. 4. The Director of Nursing. 5. The Restorative RN (Registered Nurse). 6. The Admissions Coordinator. 7. The Dietary Service Coordinator. 8. The Director of Social Services. 9. The Pharmaceutical Representative. 10. The Infection Control/Preventionist Coordinator. 11. Activities Coordinator. 12. MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator. 13. Administrative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the Antibiotic Stewardship Program was complete, accurate and done monthly for residents who are receiving antibiotics or have any type of infection. This failure has the potential to affect all 59 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: The facility policy, named Antibiotic Stewardship-Infection Control Program, no date, documents the following: It is the policy of the facility is to monitor and maintain an Antibiotic Stewardship Program that monitors the use of antibiotics and their order specifics to decrease the amount antibiotic resistant organisms following the procedure: A.) Utilize the antibiotic tracking form to monitor reason for antibiotics and; B.) Identify the use of antibiotics and the appropriateness of the situation. C.) Analyze if antibiotic meets the appropriate criteria for infection using the algorithm for treatment of specific infections if available. D.) Track whether the patient is colonized and/or if they are clinically infected. Only treat if warranted. E.) Monitor for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident call devices were in reach for one (R8) of 15 reviewed for call devices in a sample of 27. Findings include: The undated facility's Call Light, Use Of policy documents Procedure: 11. Be sure call lights are placed within resident reach at all times, never on the floor or bedside stand. On 8/12/24, at 10:05am, R8 sat in a recliner in her room. R8 stated that she uses the call light for help to get to the bathroom. I am on a water pill, so I go a lot. At this time R8's call device is on the floor beside her and out of R8's reach. On 8/12/24, at 10:10am, V18 (Unit Attendant), stated the following: As a Unit Attendant I answer call lights and also when in a room I check to make sure the residents have their call light. On 8/12/24, at 10:16am, V18 confirmed R8's call device was on the floor and stated, It must have fallen when she got up in the chair earlier and I didn't see it. R8's current Care Plan includes a focus of The resident is at moderate risk for falls related to incontinence, hemiplegia,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to perform a PASRR (Pre-admission Screening & Resident Review) rescreen after a severe mental illness diagnosis was added for one (R22) one resident reviewed for PASRRs in a sample of 27. Findings include: The facility's undated PASRR policy documents a Project Introductions including but not limited to PASRR. Level I screen identifies known/suspected PASRR conditions: MI (Mental Illness)/ID (Intellectual Disability)/RC (related condition). Level II assessment - individualized to determine presence of MI/ID/RC and needed services and supports. Determination & Needs - (NFs) Nursing Facility's must incorporate PASRR findings in the person's plan of care. Refer for Level II - Has/suspected PASRR condition; Requires a Level II. R22's Face Sheet documents R22 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and includes a diagnosis of Unspecified Psychosis not due to a Substance or known Physiological Condition with a revised date of 4/20/23. R22's PASARR Level I, review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a respiratory assessment was completed pre and post nebulizer treatment for one (R5) of one resident reviewed for nebulizer treatments in a sample of 27. Findings include: The facility's undated Nebulizer policy documents Purpose: 1. To administer bronchial medications and humidifying agents into the lungs. 2. To assist in loosening lung secretions .Procedure: 6. Note pre-treatment data such as pulse and breath sounds .14. Note post treatment data (pulse, breath sounds and any side effects) and record in the medical record. (If pulse is increased more than 20 beats per minute over baseline, notify Physician.). R5's current Physician Order Sheet/POS documents R5 has an order for Ipratropium-Albuterol Inhalation Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) mg (milligrams)/3ml (millimeters) (Ipratropium-Albuterol) 1 vial inhale orally via nebulizer four times a day related to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Unspecified. On 8/14/24, from 9:45am - 10:00am, R5 sat in her room. V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) administered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a rationale was documented by the physician for a pharmacy recommendation for one (R53) of five residents reviewed for Medication Regimen Review in a sample of 27. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, revised 10/24/22, documents Definition - Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to antipsychotics, anti-anxiety, antidepressants, or sedative-hypnotics that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior .14.1 Physician/Prescriber should document the clinical rationale for why any additional attempted dose reduction at that time would be likely to impair the resident's function or increase distressed behavior. R53's Physician Order Sheet/POS includes orders for Trazadone HCl (Hydrochloride) 100mg (milligrams) by mouth at bedtime for insomnia related to Primary Insomnia and Melatonin 5 mg by mouth at bedtime for insomnia related to Primary Insomnia. R53's Consultation Report, dated on 7/24/24 and signed by V23 (R53's Nurse Practitioner), documents Comment:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to document the rational for the continued use of an antibiotic for two of three residents (R16 and R51) reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 27. Findings Include: The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship-Infection Control policy, undated, documents the following: Procedure of Core Elements, D.) Action-Implementing at least one policy or practice to improve antibiotic use this facility will implement a stricter policy (s) on antibiotic order specifics including, but not limited to identifying clinical situations in which inappropriate antibiotics are used such as asymptomatic urinary tract infections, treating a colonized asymptomatic resident, prophylaxis, and guidelines for treating infections. The key element involved is control over antibiotic use which will reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance. The goal is to add one or two activities to start the program and over time as the program evolves implement more strategies to improve antibiotic use. Procedure 3.) The nurse shall document any signs and symptoms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper diagnoses and targeted behaviors were in place for psychotropic medications for two residents (R53 and R49) of three residents reviewed for psychotropic medications in a sample of 27. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Use policy, revised 10/24/22, documents Definition - Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to antipsychotics, anti-anxiety, antidepressants, or sedative-hypnotics that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior. Procedure - 1. Psychotropic medication is prescribed for a diagnosed condition and not being used for convenience or discipline .2.1 The facility should not use psychotropic medications to address behaviors without first determining if there is a medical, physical, functional, psychological, social or environmental cause of the resident's behaviors .2.1.3 Staff should become familiar with the cultural, medical, and psychological information about the resident to identify potential environmental and other triggers to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$146,063 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

• $118,080 — penalty dated 2025-08-06
• $27,983 — penalty dated 2024-08-15
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-04 for 27 days
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-14 for 9 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL