Pleasant View Luther Home
505 College Avenue, Ottawa, IL 61350 · Non profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (815) 434-1130 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $87,819 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-20)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.4% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.9% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.1% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.5% | 18.3% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.6% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.1% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.8% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.7% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.9% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.51 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.07 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 214 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 73.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.1%CMS range 55.7–66.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 7.1–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 73.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 76.2% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 4.8–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 69.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect a demented resident (R1) from sexual abuse by R2 with dementia and a known history of pacing, wandering, disrobing, and violence/aggression towards staff/others. This failure resulted in R2 placing his hand down R1's pants and performing repeated aggressive up and down sexual type motions. This failure resulted in R1 feeling frightened and requiring hospital examination where a minor tear near R1's vagina was noted. This failure has the potential to affect R1 and other dementia residents residing in the facility. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 12/18/24 the facility remains out of compliance at Severity Level 2 as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the facility's removal plan and quality assurance monitoring. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on 12/12/24 at 7:15pm when the facility failed to protect a demented resident (R1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify environmental hazards and implement fall prevention interventions for a resident who has a history of falls. This failure resulted in R1 tripping over a resident's wheelchair, falling and hitting his head on the floor sustaining a C1 (neck) fracture. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 5. Findings include: R1's Final Incident Report dated 4/14/25 shows (R1) is alert to self only. He requires the assistance of one caregiver to complete activities of daily living. He ambulates with his walker. On 4/10/25, (R1) finished breakfast in the dining room and began ambulating back to his room when he tripped and fell to the ground .(R1) complained of right shoulder pain and head pain. (R1) had a vomiting episode and superficial abrasion to right side of forehead he was transferred to the ER for evaluation. (R1) had imaging performed in the ER that showed a C1 fracture. R1's face sheet shows he is an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety during assisted ambulation for one (R1) resident of four reviewed for falls in a sample of four. This failure resulted in R1 receiving a fractured femur followed by a decline in condition and subsequent death. Findings include: The facility's Falls Prevention and Post-Falls Management policy, dated [DATE], documents Policy: The nursing staff, in conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist, therapy staff, and other members of the multidisciplinary team, will seek to identify and document resident risk factors for falls and establish a resident-centered falls prevention plan based on relevant assessment information. This policy also states Resident-Centered Approaches to Fall Risk Assessment: 5. The staff, with the support of the attending physician, will evaluate functional and psychological factors that may increase fall risk, including ambulation, mobility, gait, balance, Excessive motor activity, activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to perform skin risk assessments, implement additional pressure relieving interventions after a change in condition, and identify a pressure ulcer prior to its status worsening to a Stage III for one of three residents (R9) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 38. This failure resulted in R9's pressure ulcer worseing without new interventions implemented. Findings Include: The facility's Pressure Injury Prevention policy (revised 01/10/24) documents the following: The community must ensure that : A resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This policy also documents, Each resident is formally assessed for risk of developing pressure injuries using the Braden Scale completed upon admission, quarterly, significant changes, and after developing pressure injury. This same policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety during van transport for one (R1) of four residents reviewed for falls in a sample of three. This failure resulted in a 5th metacarpal fracture of R1's hand. Findings include: R1's current clinical record documents R1 is cognitively intact, and has diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness, low back pain, history of falls, and a left artificial hip joint (since 05/2023). R1's Incident note, dated 11/21/23, by V9, Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN, documents Resident slid from w/c (wheelchair) while exiting transport van. Small abrasion to forehead. Bleeding stopped and no c/o (complaint of) pain elsewhere. Neuros (neurological signs) WNL (within normal limits). On blood thinner. Witnessed by (V4, CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant). Ambulance call for transport to ER (Emergency Room) further evaluation. R1's Incident note, dated 11/21/23, by V8, LPN, documents Resident returned from (named ER/Emergency Room) due to fall. CT…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure licensed staff dispensed physician-ordered medications for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for medication administration in a sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 02/26, documents that medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications, good nursing principles and practices, and only by persons legally authorized to do so. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication. This form also documents that medications are prepared only by licensed nursing, medical, pharmacy, or other personnel authorized by state regulations to prepare medications. V4's, Certified Nursing Assistant, Termination Detail, dated 4/16/26, documents involuntary gross misconduct and breach of policy/procedures. V5's, Registered Nurse, Termination Detail, dated 4/16/26, documents involuntary gross misconduct for termination.R1's current Physician Order Sheet documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator and freezer temperatures were monitored and expired food products were discarded and not available for resident use. This failure has the potential to affect all residents who reside in the facility with a current census of 68 residents. Findings include:The Facility Resident Census Roster and Facility Matrix/802, dated 1/27/26, were reviewed. The Census Roster documented 68 Residents resided in the Facility.The Storage Procedures policy documents refrigerated storage temperature will be at 41 degrees Fahrenheit or below and frozen storage temperatures will be 0 degrees Fahrenheit or below. Temperatures will be recorded on the refrigerator and/or freezer log at least twice daily. The Date Marking policy dated 11/20/25 documents items will be marked using the attached food shelf life and dating guidelines. If a food hasn't been opened check the manufacturers date to ensure it hasn't expired. If expired discard and report to manager. The Ice Cream Freezer Temperature Log dated 09/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 4 of 6 residents (R3, R19, R40, R55) reviewed for transmission based precautions in a sample of 33.The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) Policy, dated 4/15/2025, documents EBP refers to an infection control intervention that employs targeted gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities to reduce transmission of multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs). EBPs are indicated (when contact precautions do not otherwise apply) for residents with wounds and/or indwelling medical devices regardless of MDRO colonization. Signs are to be posted on the door or wall outside the resident room indicating the type of precautions and (Personal Protective Equipment) PPE required as well as ensure PPE is available outside of the resident rooms. 1. R3 is an [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Displaced Intertrochanteric Fracture of Left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication was necessary based on an appropriate diagnosis, associated behaviors, non-pharmacological intervention were care planned nor was the resident or resident representative informed in advance of the risks and benefits the medication, the treatment alternatives or other options for 1 of 6 residents (R61) who receive psychotropic medications.Findings include:The Psychotropic Medication Management System policy, dated 10/26/22, documents a psychotropic drug includes anti-depressants. Behavior monitoring involves identifying behaviors, the number of behavior episodes and success of interventions. A care plan is developed to reflect specific non-pharmacological approaches to care to meet the individual needs of a resident. Prior to administration of a psychotropic medication, the following must be documented: any new antipsychotic medication order will be discussed and reviewed by the Interdisciplinary Team; must have an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a PASRR Level I (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) re-evaluated with a new psychotic diagnosis for one of one resident (R9) reviewed for PASRRs in the sample of 33.R9's admission record documents R9 was admitted to facility on 2/18/23.R9's PASRR Level I screening, dated 2/6/23, documents, PASRR Level I determination: No Level II required - No SMI/ID/RC (Serious Mental Illness/Intellectual Disease/Related Condition). Your Level I screen does not show that you have a serious mental illness or an intellectual/developmental disability (IDD). You do not need more screening unless you have or may have a serious mental illness or an IDD and experience a significant change in treatment needs. R9's Diagnosis Report dated 1/28/26 documents R9 was newly diagnosed with psychotic disorder on 2/28/23. Then on 4/1/23, R9 was newly diagnosed with Vascular Dementia with Psychotic Disturbance, Major Depressive Disorder, and Visual Hallucinations.As of 1/28/26, R9's medical record had no documentation of a new PASRR Level I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care to address resident specific concerns for three of twenty residents (R5, R9 and R28), reviewed for care plans, in a sample of 33. The facility policy, Person- Centered Care Plan, dated (revised) 11/28/2017 directs staff, Person- centered care means to support the resident in making their own choices and having over their daily lives. The Person- centered care plan is in accordance with professional standards of practice and includes the resident's choice. The plan of care addresses the following: Identification of resident areas of needs, problems, strengths, goals, life history and preferences. 1.R5's Physician Order Sheet, dated January 2026 includes the following medications and diagnosis: 1/22/26 Cipro Oral Tablet 500 MG (milligrams) (antibiotic). Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) for 7 Days. A review of R5's current Care Plan, dated 2/14/2025 includes no documentation of R5's current urinary tract infection. On 01/29/2026 at 11:00 A.M., V4/Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician to two (R26 and R60) of nine residents reviewed for medication pass. This failure resulted in two errors out of twenty-eight opportunities for a 6.9 percent medication error rate.Findings include:The facility's Medication Administration policy, undated, documents in section 7.1, page 3, that medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber.The facility's Medication Ordering and Receiving From Pharmacy Provider policy, dated 1/25, documents that all medications shall be reordered in advance by writing the medication name and prescription number or applying the peel-off bar coded labeled from the prescription label on the reorder sheet and faxing or otherwise transmitting the order to the pharmacyR26's Physician Order Sheet documents for R26 to take Cetirizine HCL Oral tablet 10MG (milligrams) one time a day for allergies.On 1/28/26 at 8:10am, V7, Registered Nurse, prepared all R26's scheduled 9:00am medications except for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement safety interventions for a resident at moderate risk for falls while on the toilet for one (R2) of three residents reviewed for falls in a sample of three. The facility's Mechanical Lift policy, reviewed 5/23/25, documents for the Power Stand-Up Lift Procedure: Assemble all supplies within reach, including lift and lift harness. b. Position the top of the harness around the upper body of the resident (approximately 4-5 inches below the underarm). c. Securely fasten the harness safety strap around the resident's chest. This form documents that when lifting a resident from a wheelchair or other chair, secure the harness loops onto the lift. b. Secure the shin straps around the resident's legs. The facility's Falls Prevention and Post-Falls Management policy, reviewed 9/6/25, documents that the staff, with the support of the attending physician, will evaluate functional and psychological factors that may increase fall risk, including ambulation, mobility, gait balance, excessive motor activity, activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-15 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement psychosocial service interventions for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for social services in sample of three. Findings include:The facility's Behavioral Health policy, reviewed 12/18/24, documents that the organization will provide residents with behavioral health services as needed to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. This form documents that behavioral health services are provided to residents as needed as part of the interdisciplinary, person-centered approach to care, and residents who exhibit signs of emotional/psychosocial distress receive services and supportthat address their individual needs and goals for care. On 11/15/25 at 8:45am, R1 stated that he and his wife lived in an apartment in the assisted living portion of the facility. R1 stated that he and his wife had separated and are getting divorced after 40-plus years of marriage. R1 stated that he was moved to the long-term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the recommended guidelines to properly treat and disinfect a resident room with suspected bed bugs to prevent the spread of bed bugs for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 3. The findings include: On 6/27/25 at 9:33 AM, R2 was in him room, sitting in his wheelchair. R2 said the staff reported bed bugs were found in this room on 6/23/25. R2 said they bagged his clothing this time on 6/24/25 (Tuesday) and he moved to another room and came back to his room on 6/26/25. On 6/27/25 at 9:47 AM, R1 was in his wheelchair out of his room on the computer in the lounge area. R1's hair was past his shoulder, long, scraggly, greasy and matted in the back. R1 had a long facial beard approximately 3 inches past his chin. R1 said on 6/23/25, the staff found a bed bug on his blanket near his leg. R1 said he stayed in his room until 6/26/25, when his room was sprayed by a pest exterminator. R1 said when they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of a change on resident's anti depressant medication to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for notification of change in the sample of 5. Findings include: R2's electronic face sheet printed last 5/7/25 show R2 has diagnoses of dementia and major depressive disorder. The face sheet show V14 (R2's Daughter) is R2's power of attorney (POA). On 5/7/25 at 12PM, V14 said R2's antidepressant medication's dose (Zoloft) was decreased without the facility notifying her. V14 said when she came back from vacation last March 2025, she noticed R2 was being tearful and emotional. V14 said she requested a copy of R2's medication record and found out that R2's dose of Zoloft was decreased from 75 milligrams (mg) to 50 mg. V14 said she did not consent to the dose change. V14 said she informed V4 that she would have not given permission of R2's antidepressant dose decreased. R2's electronic medical record (EMAR) documents that from 12/24 to 1/22/25, R2 was on Zoloft 75 mg. On 1/23/25, R2 was put on Zoloft 50 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify a resolution of a grievance to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for grievances in the sample of 5. Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 1:30 PM, V14 (R2's POA and daughter) said on 4/16/25 while she was at the facility, she sent an electronic communication (text) with V4 (Resource Nurse) letting her know that she wanted to file a grievance regarding R2. V14 said she arrived at R2's room close to 10AM last 4/16/25. Upon opening R2's door, R2's room was with strong urine odor. R2 was in bed, soaked and wet with urine, R2 had not been gotten up and had not eaten her breakfast. V14 said she wanted V4 to come to R2's room and see what was going on. V14 said she saw V4 in the elevator and said to V4, I hope you are figuring out what happened this morning (with R2) and get back to me. V14 said she had not heard from V4 or any staff from the facility regarding the findings of her grievance regarding R2's issue, it's almost a month now. On 5/6/25 at 10:30 AM, V4 (Resource Nurse) said on 4/16/25 around 10AM, she received a text from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide incontinence care to a resident that need extensive assist with Activities of daily living (ADL) to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 5. Findings include: R2's facility assessment dated [DATE] show R2 is frequently incontinent of urine and need assist with toileting and transfers. On 5/6/25 at 12:30 PM, V14 (R2's daughter) said last 4/16/25 she arrived at the facility almost 10AM. R2's room was permeating with strong urine odor. R2 was still in bed, she was soaked and wet. R2 was trying to get up from bed, her foot was already dangling at the side of the bed. V14 said she was very upset, R2 was not toileted. On 5/7/25 at 2:30 PM, V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) said she was R2's CNA the night shift from 4/15/25 going to 4/16/25. R2 went to bed at 11:30 PM. V16 said at around 2:30 AM, she went to R2's room and offered R2 to be toileted but R2 refused. At 7AM, V16 said she did not go and check on R2 again…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff completely covered hair in a sanitary manner while in the kitchen; failed to ensure food items were stored and labeled with dates and identification, and failed to ensure chemical product was not stored in the facility's Dry Food Storage Room. These failures have the potential to affect 76 of the 77 residents who consume food in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Use of Hair Restraints Policy dated 1/17/25 documents: Culinary employees will practice safe food handling to prevent food borne illness. The organization has strict requirements regarding hair restraints: A. Employees will wear hairnets or ball caps that completely cover the hair while in the kitchen or service food. If hair hangs below the ball cap, a hairnet must be worn. B. Beards and mustaches must be covered with effective hair restraint if longer than one-half inch in length, otherwise neatly trimmed close to the face. The facility's Storage Procedures Policy dated 1/17/25 documents: Food and supplies shall be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-28 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff were educated and competent in providing Hospice and End of Life Care for Hospice Residents for nine of nine residents (R14, R23, R40, R43, R51, R52, R61, R62, R65) reviewed for Hospice services in a sample of 38 residents Findings include: The Hospice Agreement for Nursing Facility, Inpatient and Inpatient Respite Care Services dated 8/10/16 documented 4.6 Experience and Competence. It and its employees and personnel providing services pursuant to this agreement are (i) familiar with the administrative and patient care needs associated with hospice patients, (ii) competent in the care of terminally ill persons and in recordkeeping, and (iii) otherwise fully capable of performing its and their obligations hereunder in accordance with generally recognized professional standards of care. The facility's current Matrix 802 documents R14, R23, R40, R43, R51, R52, R61, R62, and R65 receive Hospice care. On 2/26/25 at 12:10 PM, V5 (Registered Nurse/ Date of Hire: 5/14/24) and V9 (Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene, glove changes and perform pressure ulcer dressing change in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one (R48) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 38. Findings include: The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 7/19/25, documents: Good hand hygiene is a requirement of Standard Precautions. Hand hygiene is performed before and after each care contact for which hand hygiene is indicated by acceptable professional practice, utilizing designated time frames and products. Alcohol based hand rub (ABHR) is the preferred method, however, hands should be washed with soap and water when they are visibly soiled, before or after eating or handling food, after using the restroom and after caring for a resident with known or suspected clostridium Difficile or norovirus infection. Standard Precautions are designed to reduce the risk of transmission of blood borne and other significant pathogens. Standard Precautions apply to all contact with any blood,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles were dated and changed per policy for two (R25 and R127) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 38. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen Policy, dated 3/8/24, documents Oxygen tubing will be changed routinely. 1. The current Order Summary Report for R25, documents the following physician orders dated 1/14/25: O2 (oxygen) 1-3 LPM (liters per minute) per nasal cannula continuously to maintain O2 saturation greater than 90% every shift; and to change and label oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle weekly every Sunday night shift. On 2/25/25 at 10:15 am, R25 was sitting up in a wheelchair with oxygen infusing at 1.5 liters via nasal cannula, by way of oxygen concentrator. A humidifier bottle dated 2/16/25 was attached to the concentrator and there was no visible date on R25's oxygen tubing. 2. The current Order Summary Report for R127, documents the following dated physician orders: 2/23/25 O2 at 2 LPM per nasal cannula continuously to maintain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Hospice providers provided the facility with written physician orders for one of three residents (R42) reviewed for Hospice services in a sample of 38 residents. Findings include: The Hospice's Agreement for Nursing Facility, Inpatient and Inpatient Respite Services dated [DATE] stated Appendix C Facility Services 1.4 Physician Orders: To the extent permitted by applicable law, rules, and regulations, (Hospice) nurses may receive and transcribe physician orders in the Facility's clinical records for any Residential Hospice Patient. Such physician orders will be countersigned by Facility's Director of Nursing or other Facility nurse. The Physician Orders-Obtaining and Transcribing policy dated [DATE] documented 1. All orders for medications, tests and treatments shall be written on the physician's order form and signed by the physician or physician extender unless entered into EHR (Electronic Health Record). R42's Care Plan documented R42 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document clinical rationale for extending PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication for one (R6) of two residents reviewed for psychotropic medications in a sample of 38. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Management System policy, dated 10/26/24, documents (Named facility) has developed a system to ensure a resident is not given psychotropic medications unless a comprehensive assessment identifies clear indications and parameters for their use, based upon regulatory compliance and best practice. With administration of a psychotropic medication, the following will be documented: PRN orders are limited to 14 days unless the prescriber believes it is appropriate to extend the order beyond 14 days and documents their rationale in the clinical record and indicates the duration for the PRN order. R6's current Physician Order Statement/POS, dated 2/5/25, documents an order for Alprazolam (psychotropic) oral tablet 0.5mg (milligrams) give one tablet by mouth as needed for Anxiety for 30 Days TID (three times…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-28 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Hospice's coordinated communication and required documents were available and accessible to the facility staff. This deficiency affects three of four residents (R23, R42, R43) reviewed for Hospice care management in a sample of 38 residents. Findings include: The Hospice Agreement for Nursing Facility, Inpatient and Inpatient Respite Care Services dated [DATE] stated 2.1.5 Medical Record Documentation. Facility shall allow (Hospice) access to appropriate medical records and permit the inclusion of (Hospice) care plans and other appropriate documentation in the Patient's Facility medical record. 2.1.7 Plan of Care (Hospice) shall provide Facility with a copy of a Hospice Plan of Care for each Hospice Patient admitted to Facility. Appendix C Facility Services 1.4 Physician Orders: To the extent permitted by applicable law, rules, and regulations, (Hospice) nurses may receive and transcribe physician orders in the Facility's clinical records…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement their abuse prevention program to screen, protect, and report allegations of sexual abuse for two (R1 and R2) of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Abuse and Neglect of a Resident policy, last revised 6/16/23, documents Policy Statement: The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. Definitions: Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident, including, but not limited to, assault, rape, or sexual harassment. Examples are: exhibitionism by the service provider, forcing the individual receiving services to view pornographic material, intimate touching of the individual receiving services by the service provider during bathing, molesting the individual receiving services. Capacity and Consent - residents have the right to engage in consensual sexual activity. However, anytime the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and report a potential allegation of resident to resident (R1 and R2) sexual abuse to the Abuse Coordinator for three residents reviewed for Abuse in a sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Abuse and Neglect of a Resident policy, last revised 6/16/24, documents, Policy Statement: The resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. Sexual Abuse - is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident, including but not limited to, assault, rape, or sexual harassment. Examples are: exhibitionism by the service provider, forcing the individual receiving services to view pornographic material, intimate touching of the individual receiving services by the service provider during bathing, molesting the individual receiving services. Capacity and Consent - residents have the right to engage in consensual sexual activity. However, anytime the facility has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report allegations of Employee to Resident Physical Abuse to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator for one (R1) resident reviewed for abuse in a sample of three. Findings include: The facility's Abuse and Neglect of a Resident Policy, dated 6/16/23 documents: 6. Protection of Residents: Team members of this facility who have been accused of mistreatment will be removed from resident contact immediately until the administrator or designee has reviewed the results of the investigation. Team members accused of possible mistreatment shall not complete the shift as a direct care provider to residents. 7. Internal Reporting: If a resident is alleging abuse or neglect (physical, sexual, verbal, emotional, mental), the team member receiving the complaint will immediately notify their direct supervisor and the Coordinator of Abuse Prevention. Facility's Initial Report to State Department on R1 dated 3/27/24 documents: (V1 Administrator) of (Facility) was notified on 3/27/24 by (V5 Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to answer a resident's call light in a timely manner for one of one resident (R34) reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of 38. Finding include: The facility's Resident Call System policy, dated 5/15/23, documents It is the policy of the community to ensure all residents and patients have access to a system by which they can alert the staff to their needs and that staff respond in a timely manner to their request. It is the expectation that all call lights will be answered in a timely manner. The facility's Resident Council minutes, dated 1/16/24, document residents who attended the meeting voiced concerns with call light times. These minutes document Residents state they are waiting for long times after putting call lights on but delayed on the system itself. Residents are afraid if an emergency arises they won't be assisted in time. R34's current Care Plan, dated 1/31/24, documents (R34) is a risk for falls related to weakness due to hip fracture and history of prior falls. Interventions: Be sure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for chronic urinary tract infections, antibiotic and oxygen use for two residents (R21 and R53) of 18 reviewed for comprehensive care plans in a sample of 38. Findings include: The facility's Person-Centered Care Plan (Baseline and Comprehensive) policy, revised 11/28/23, documents the baseline plan of care includes, but not limited to: Identification of resident areas of needs, problems, strengths, goals, life history and preferences. 1. R21's Physician Order Sheet, dated 1/24/24, documents to take Nitrofurantoin Oral Capsule (antibiotic) 100mg (milligrams) by mouth two times a day for a urinary tract infection for 14 days. R21's urinalysis, dated 1/24/24, indicates that R 21 currently has a urinary tract infection. R21's current care plan does not have any goals or interventions to address R21's chronic, UTI's, (Urinary Tract Infections) or antibiotic use. On 1/31/24 at 10:20am, V4, Registered Nurse, Minimum Data Set/Care plan/Wound Care, stated that R21 has had chronic UTI's within the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review the facility failed to ensure a range of motion program was in place for a resident with functional limitations in range of motion for two of three residents (R36 and R53) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 38. Findings include: The facility's Restorative Nursing Services policy (revised 12/19/23) documents the following: Restorative nursing care consists of nursing interventions that may or may not be accompanied by formalized rehabilitation services. The components of a restorative program may include goals on range of motion (active and passive), splint and brace, bed mobility, transfer, walking, dressing or grooming, eating or swallowing, amputation/prosthesis care and communication. 1. R36's current medical record documents R36's diagnoses to include: Cerebral Palsy, History of Falling, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. R36's Minimum Data Set Assessment (dated 11/14/23), Section GG, Functional Limitation in Range of Motion documents the following: R36 has impairment on one side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on (observation), interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide justification for the use of an antipsychotic medication and create a care plan for the use of an antipsychotic medication for R34, failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction for an antipsychotic medication for R51 and failed to identify specific target behaviors to warrant the use of an antipsychotic medication for (R34, R47 and R51) three of five residents reviewed for antipsychotics in the sample of 38. Findings Include: The facility policy, Psychotropic Medication Management System, dated (revised) 10/26/2022 directs staff, (The facility) has developed a system to ensure a resident is not given psychotropic medications unless a comprehensive assessment identifies clear indications and parameters for their use, based upon regulatory compliance and best practices. Behavior Management: (the facility) is committed to provide necessary behavioral, mental and/or emotional health care and services to each resident. Behavioral monitoring is initiated on all residents who exhibited behaviors in the past…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-02-28 · tag F0574 — widespreadThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility Ombudsman posting was visible to residents residing on the second, third, and fourth floors of the facility. This has the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities policy and procedure, dated November 2018, documents You have the right to meet with the Long-Term Care Ombudsman, community organizations, social service groups, legal advocates, and members of the general public who come to your facility. On 2/26/25 at 1:42 pm R32 and R33 from the second floor, R72 from the third floor, and R24 and R35 from the fourth floor attended the Resident Group meeting. R24, R32, R33, R35, and R72 stated they are unaware of who the facility Ombudsman is, how to contact the Ombudsman and have not seen an Ombudsman posting on their floors. On 2/26/25 at 3:45 pm, an Ombudsman poster with contact information was posted at the entrance to the facility on the first floor, where no residents reside. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-02-28 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility's Survey Binder included all prior survey results conducted by the State Agency and was easily accessible to residents. This has the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities policy and procedure documents You have the right to see reports of all inspections by the (State Agency) from the last five years and the most recent review of your facility along with any plan that your facility gave to the surveyors saying how your facility plans to correct the problem. On 2/26/25 at 1:42 pm R32 and R33 from the second floor, R72 from the third floor, and R24 and R35 from the fourth floor attended the Resident Group meeting. R24, R32, R33, R35, and R72 stated they are unaware the facility kept record of State Agency surveys, have not seen this information, and do not know where to locate the Survey Binder. On 2/26/25 at 2:41 pm, The facility Survey Binder was located on the upper level of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-02-28 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident/resident representative of the reason for transfer in writing for six (R1, R5, R6, R11, R31, R127) of six residents reviewed for emergency hospital transfer in a sample of 38. This has the potential to affect all 77 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Admission, Transfer and Discharge Policy, dated 12/11/24, documents: 3. Notice of Transfer: Before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must- a. Notify the resident and the resident's representative(s) of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. 1. R5's Electronic Medical Records documentation indicated that R5 was sent to the hospital on 5/23/24. There was no documentation indicating that R5 or R5's representative was given transfer documents at the time of transfer to the hospital. 2. R31's Progress Notes, dated 2/8/25, documents R31 was transferred to the local hospital after a fall with injury. There is no documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-02-28 · tag F0625 — widespreadNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a copy of the Bed Hold Policy for six (R1, R5, R6, R11, R31, R127) of six residents reviewed for emergency hospital transfer in the sample of 38.This has the potential to affect all residents that currently reside in the faclity. Findings include: The facility's Bed Hold Policy-Healthcare Policy, dated 12/4/20, documents: Notice of Bed Hold and readmission Policy will be provided before hospitalization or leave. A second notice will be provided to resident at time of transfer or within 24 hours of emergency. 1. R5's Electronic Medical Records documentation indicated that R5 was sent to the hospital on 5/23/24. There was no documentation indicating that R5 or R5's representative was given a copy of the Bed Hold Policy at the time of transfer to the hospital. 2. R31's Progress Notes, dated 2/5/25, documents R31 was transferred to the local hospital after a fall with injury. There is no documentation indicating that R31 or R31's representative was given a copy of the facility's Bed Hold policy and procedure at the time…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$87,819 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $38,711 — penalty dated 2024-12-20
- $21,450 — penalty dated 2024-06-20
- $27,658 — penalty dated 2024-01-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-25 for 14 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-06 for 10 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLACK, TERRI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/01/2023 |
| BENTLEY, MEREDITH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/14/2020 |
| LACROIX, AMY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/03/2022 |
| RENETZKY, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/2003 |
| RICHTER AND ASSOCIATES | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/04/2026 |
| SELECT REHABILITATION, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2023 |
| THOMAS MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/20/2022 |
| MAGUIRE, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2020 |
| ZELLERS, AMY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/17/2024 |
| LUTHERAN LIFE COMMUNITIES | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2012 |
| LUTHERAN LIFE MINISTRIES | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2012 |
| OLD NATIONAL BANK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/17/1992 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $494K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145801. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.