Timbercreek Rehab and Health Care Center
2220 State Street, Pekin, IL 61554 · For profit - Corporation · 202 certified beds · (309) 347-1110 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jul 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (76) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $260,624 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-28)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 35.5% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.6% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 36.9% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.3% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 49.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.7% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.7% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 12.2% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.4% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.6% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.67 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.74 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
40.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 12.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 40.7%CMS range 28.1–54.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.5–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 12.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 12.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 16.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.2%CMS range 4.2–14.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.95 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 202 beds and averages 89.0 residents a day — about 44% occupied, or roughly 113 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.20 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.24 to 0.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
76 citations, most serious first. The 21 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2026-03-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure baseboard heaters were maintained in a safe manner and failed to implement an effective system to monitor heater surface temperatures and resident room arrangements, including bed placement, to prevent burn hazards and potential fire risks. These deficient practices resulted in R1 becoming entrapped between the bed and a baseboard heater, sustaining painful partial-thickness burns with blistering to the left upper arm, left forearm, and left hand that required emergency room treatment. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all 87 residents residing in the facility.These failures resulted in Immediate Jeopardy.While the immediacy was removed on 3/25/26, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of their removal plan and Quality Assurance monitoring.These requirements were not met as evidenced by:Based on observation,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a resident with known wandering and exit seeking behaviors from leaving the facility without staff supervision for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for elopement in a sample of four. R1 was last seen by staff in the facility on 7/13/24 at 6:00 pm and was located three days later (7/16/24) on a local park bench, approximately two and a half miles from the facility, in 90-degree Fahrenheit temperature. This failure resulted in R1 requiring transportation to the local hospital for evaluation and treatment. This failure has the potential to affect all Elopement Risk Residents residing in the facility. Findings include: This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 7/24/24, the facility remains out of compliance at a Severity Level two as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the removal plan including their In-service training and Quality Assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Interview and Record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of new onset, unilateral extremity pain for a resident with severe cognitive impairment for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for injury in the sample of four. This failure resulted in R1 waiting over 24 hours to receive emergency care/ imaging for a fracture of R1's right tibia and fibula.Findings include: R1's current Care Plan, dated 8/11/25, documents R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Anxiety, Senile Degeneration, and Severe Dementia with Psychotic disturbance. This care plan documents Resident has a behavior problem of increased confusion with anxiety related to: Alzheimer's or related dementia.R1's electronic progress note, dated 8/5/2025 at 1:26 PM and signed by V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse), documents, Late entry: 8/3/25 (R1) was observed in hallway acting per normal. Propelling herself while whimpering she wants to go home repeatedly. While in the dining room, this nurse attempted to administer medications and PRN (as need) ABH (Ativan, Benadryl,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident safety during van transportation for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for accidents in a sample of five. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a fall and suffering from pain and fractured ribs. Findings include: The facility's Fleet Safety Program, undated, documents, Safety Policy: (Named facility) has implemented a fleet management program to establish minimum safety requirements for the operation of vehicles used for company business. We are committed to providing and maintaining a safe working environment for our employees and protecting our residents and citizens of the community from injury and property loss. Your commitment to these policies and procedures are vital to building a safe driving culture within (named facility) and ensuring your own safety, the safety of others and the success of the business. This document continues to state Employee/Driver: Comply with the requirements of this program .Follow all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a wound and promptly initiate treatment upon identification of pressure ulcer for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for pressure ulcer wound treatment in the sample of eleven. This failure resulted in R2's pressure ulcer worsening to Unstageable. Findings include: Facility's Decubitus Care/Pressure Area Policy Revised 1/2018 documents: 2. The pressure area will be assessed and documented on the Treatment Administration Record/TAR or the Wound Documentation Record. 3. Complete all areas of the Treatment Administration Record or Wound Documentation Record. I) Document size, stage, depth, drainage, color, odor, and treatment (upon obtaining from the physician); 4) Notify the physician for treatment orders. R2's Face Sheet documents R2's diagnoses include: Cerebral infarction, aphasia, weakness, metabolic encephalopathy, myocardial infarction type, atherosclerotic heart disease, essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus. R2's current Care Plan documents: (R2) is at risk for impaired skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to prevent accidents/falls with injury for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in R1 requiring hospital evaluation and treatment for injuries and a decline in Activities of Daily Living (R1). Findings include: Facility Fall Prevention Policy, revised 1/10/18, documents: to provide for Resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls, decrease falls and still honor each Resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility; all staff observe residents for safety; final risk score will be determined by the Interdisciplinary Team/IDT based on fall risk score, history of falls, medical condition which directly impacts on equilibrium and/or ambulation; unit nurse will immediately assess the Resident and provide care or treatment if needed and a fall huddle will be conducted with staff on duty to help identify circumstances of the even and appropriate interventions; unit nurse will place documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to supply Physician ordered pain medication and manage pain for one Resident (R1) of three reviewed for pain in a sample of three. This failure resulted in R1's increased level of pain and decline in Activity of Daily Living. Findings include: Facility Pain Prevention and Treatment Policy, revised 12/7/17, documents: it is the Facility policy to assess for, reduce the incidence of and the severity of pain in an effort to minimize further health problems, maximize Activity of Daily Living functioning and enhance the quality of life; assessment of pain and if appropriate, treatment in order to assure the needs of the resident who experience problems with pain are met; intervention implemented to reduce pain which may include the use of medication, medical devices or treatments, but are not limited to heat or cold or massages; and a plan based on information gathered during a resident pain assessment that identifies the resident's needs and specifies appropriate interventions to alleviate pain to the extent feasible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to prevent a resident fall with injury for one of four residents (R3) reviewed for falls in a sample of four. This failure resulted in R3 sustaining a large hematoma to right forehead and R3 having pain. On 1/2/2023 at R3 was observed sitting in the main dining room in a reclining chair. R3 had a noticeable hematoma to right forehead with a yellowish color around the hematoma and down R3's right lateral face. R3's Nurses Notes, dated 12/202/2023, documents, (R3) was noted on the floor in her room. (R3's) face was down to right side of bed with head towards door and feet to window. (R3) was rolled over onto back and noted a large bump to right forehead. (R3) was sent to the local hospital for evaluation. On 1/3/2024 at 10:45AM V4/LPN (Licensed Practical Nurses) stated, When I entered R3's room the wheel was broken off R3's wheelchair and on the floor. R3 was laying on the floor face down. R3's Quality Care Reporting Form, dated 12/20/2023 at 3PM, documents, (R3) sent to local hospital for an evaluation after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall for one (R4) of three residents reviewed for accidents in a sample of three. This failure resulted in R4 being transferred to the Emergency Department/ED with injuries to face, sustaining a hematoma and an uncontrolled nose bleed. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention Policy, dated 11/10/18, documents: Policy: To provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decreases falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility. 2. Identify, on admission, the resident's risk for falls. 5. Immediately after any resident fall the unit nurse will assess the resident and provide any care or treatment needed for the resident. R4's diagnoses included: Adult Failure to thrive, Iron deficiency anemia, hypertension, osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder, obstructive sleep apnea, syncope, chronic subdural hematoma, diabetes mellitus, encephalopathy, unsteady gait, recurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for one resident (R64) of 19 residents reviewed for physician orders in the sample of 39. This failure resulted in R64 experiencing unresolved back and shoulder pain. Findings include: Facility Fall Prevention Policy, revised 11/10/18, documents: to provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decrease falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility; immediately after any resident fall the Unit Nurse will assess the resident and provide any care or treatment needed for the resident; a fall huddle will be conducted with staff on duty to help identify circumstances of the event and appropriate interventions; the Unit Nurse will place documentation of the circumstances of a fall in the Nurses Notes or on an AIM for Wellness form along with any new intervention deemed to be appropriate at the time. 1. R64's Physician Telephone Order, dated 8/16/23, documents an order for a Magnetic Resonance Imaging laboratory test/MRI to R64's Right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to evaluate each residents fall, failed to conduct root cause analysis and failed to implement interventions to reduce the risk of future falls for one of three residents (R38) reviewed for falls in the sample of 33. This failure resulted in R38 falling on 7/19/22 and receiving a trimalleolar fracture of the right ankle. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention policy, dated 11/10/18, documents, Policy: to provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decrease falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility. Immediately after any resident fall the unit nurse will assess the resident and provide any care or treatment needed for the resident. A fall huddle will be conducted with staff on duty to help identify circumstances of the event and appropriate interventions. The unit nurse will place documentation of the circumstances of a fall in the nurses notes or on an AIM for Wellness form along with any new intervention deemed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-20 · tag F0557 — widespreadHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain adequate laundry services due to department staffing shortages, resulting in delayed clothing returns and a lack of available personal clothing for residents. This failure has the potential to affect all 89 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: The facility's Environmental Services Account Manager Job Description, undated, documents Position Summary: Manages and supervises the environmental services staff at a single site according to policies and procedures, and federal/state requirements. Provides leadership, support, coordination, and guidance to ensure that quality standards, inventory levels, safety guidelines, and customer services expectations are met. This same Job Description documents The manager is also responsible for coordinating and insuring the satisfactory and timely completion of project and program work done in the building on various shifts. The facility's Laundry Worker Job Description,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-06-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained an effective pest control program. This has the potential to affect all 89 residents.Findings include:The facility's Pest Control Policy, dated 2019, documents Policy: The facility maintains an effective pest control program to remain free of pests and rodents. Facility-wide pest-control strategies are developed emphasizing kitchens, cafeterias, laundry, central sterile supply areas, loading docks, construction activities, and other regions prone to pest infestation. 1. On-going measures are taken to prevent, contain, and eradicate common household pests such as roaches, ants, mosquitoes, flies, mice, and rats. 2. General measures to decrease pests include the elimination of cracks and crevices, proper lighting and ventilation, use of screens on windows and doors, and use of self-closing doors. 4. All food stored in the dietary area is kept in a designated area in securely covered containers, is off the floor, and away from the walls.The Illinois Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-05-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview record review and observation the facility failed to provide appetizing or appealing-appearing food and appropriate condiments for residents of the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 94 residents currently residing in the facility.Findings include: The facility was unable to provide a Dietary policy.The Resident Roster provided by the Administrator on 5/5/26 documented 94 residents resided in the facility.On 5/6/26 at 12:20pm R1 and R3 stated meals served by the facility are not appealing and often inedible. On 5/6/26 at 12:30pm R4, R5, and R6 were eating lunch in the dining room. The posted lunch menu listed the lunch meal was: Chicken Fried [NAME] and Zucchini. The fried rice was brown with very small pieces of diced chicken, and the zucchini slices were limp and sitting in watery fluid. On 5/8/26 during the lunch meal service the menu posted in the Dining Room was dated Wednesday 5/6/26 and listed the Fried [NAME] and Zucchini meal served on Wednesday. The lunch menu for 5/8/26 lunch meal was documented as Ravioli and roasted yellow squash…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with personal hygiene cares for one resident (R1) of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living in the sample of 11. Findings include:R1 is a [AGE] year-old resident of the facility admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Scoliosis, Sciatica, COPD/Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease; CHF/Congestive Heart Failure; Lymphedema; Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.R1's current Care Plan documents the following: (R1) has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Self Care Performance Deficit. PERSONAL HYGIENE/ORAL CARE: The resident requires X1 Extensive staff assist with personal hygiene and oral care.On 5/5/26 at 2:10pm V5 CNA/Certified Nursing Assistant stated R1 requires set-up for morning and HS personal hygiene cares in her room. On 5/5/26 at 2:20 pm, R1 was sitting in a bariatric wheelchair in her room, awake, alert and oriented. R1 stated she is never given a face cloth, towel, soap or a basin of water for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation the facility failed to provide physician-ordered medication for one resident (R1) of six residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 11.Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obesity; CHF/Congestive Heart Failure, Scoliosis, Sciatica, Lymphedema, Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes.The facility's Medication Availability policy documents the following: Nursing administration to compare the orders to the medications in the med cart to ensure medications are available. Refills ordered timely through the EHR (pharmacy's electronic medication re-ordering system) .Night shift responsible for reordering insulins, inhalers, eye drops, controlled drugs every Monday and Thursday night, and If medication not available, staff to check (back-up medication) for med, staff to call the pharmacy if med not in (backup medication system), notify DON/Director of Nursing, notify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-03-28 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) training to all employees. This failure has the potential to affect all 87 residents residing within the facility.Findings include:The facility's Midnight Census Report dated 3/24/26 document 87 residents reside within the facility.The facility's Annual In-Service Schedule does not include in-servicing regarding QAPI.The facility's Staff In-Services and Computer Based Training dated 3/1/25 through 3/28/26 were reviewed and did not include QAPI training.On 3/28/26 at 9:50 AM V1 (Administrator In Training) verified facility staff have not received QAPI training.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform pressure ulcer care and skin checks as ordered for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for pressure ulcer care in a sample of four. The facility's Pressure Injury Assessment and Treatment policy, dated 12/2024, documents to document in the resident electronic medical record when the treatment is completed. On 12/4/25, R1 stated that his wound care varies as to when it is completed. R1 stated that the wound care is done at least daily. R1's Treatment Administration Record, dated 11/12/25 through 12/4/25, documents to cleanse R1's left heel with soap and water. Apply Dakins (antiseptic) soaked gauze to the wound bed and cover with an abdominal pad, and cover with a gauze wrap and apply heel boots every day shift. This treatment is not signed out as being completed 11/12/25, 11/18/25, 1/19/25, 11/22/25 through 11/26/25, 12/1/25, and 12/2/25. This form also documents to perform daily skin checks. R1's daily skin checks were not signed out as being completed on 11/12/25, 11/19/25, 11/22/25 through 11/26/25, and 12/1/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to perform nephrostomy care, urinary catheter care, and document urinary output as ordered for one of two residents (R1) reviewed for bowel and bladder in a sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Catheter Care, Urinary policy, dated 12/2024, documents to maintain accurate record of the residents' daily output every shift. This form documents to empty the collection bag at least every eight hours. Catheter irrigation may be ordered to prevent obstruction in residents at risk for obstruction. On 12/4/25 at 9:30am, R1 stated he thinks his catheter care and nephrostomy care are done at least daily but does not know for sure. R1's Treatment Administration Record, dated 11/12/26 through 12/4/25, documents to flush R1's urinary catheter with 30 milliliters of normal saline every day and night shift. This form documents R1's normal saline flush was only done once on 11/13/25 and 11/14/25, 11/22/25 through 11/26/25. R1's urinary catheter output monitor and record output every day and night shift were not done on 11/13/25, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, Interview and Record Review, the facility failed to ensure that direct resident care staffing was adequate to meet the needs of residents in the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 83 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:The facility's Resident Roster dated 8/22/25 and provided by V1 (Administrator), documents there are 83 residents residing in the facility.The facility's (undated) Resident Acuity spreadsheet provided by V1 (Administrator) on 8/25/25, documents the facility has 75 residents who require some level of staff assistance with Activities of Daily Living. Of those 75 residents, 27 of them require moderate assistance and 36 require total dependence on staff. This spreadsheet also documents 40 residents have behavioral mental health needs, 14 of which display aggression.R3's Grievance/ Complaint form, dated 8/4/25 and signed by V1 (Administrator), documents, This resident came to the SSD (Social Services Director, V5) to talk about the staffing. The resident is happy with staff but is unhappy with the cuts/ shortages.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and document a resident's pain and administer pain medication to a resident with severe cognitive impairment, who was later diagnosed with right lower leg fractures for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for accidents in the sample of four. Findings include:R1's current Care Plan, dated 8/11/25, documents R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Anxiety, Senile Degeneration, and Severe Dementia with Psychotic disturbance. This care plan documents Resident has a behavior problem of increased confusion with anxiety related to: Alzheimer's or related dementia.R1's Treatment Administration Record (TAR), dated 8/1/25-8/22/25, documents R1 has an order for Pain monitoring every shift, every day and night shift. Start Date, 3/10/2025. This record does not document dayshift pain monitoring was assessed on 8/2/25 or 8/3/25. This same TAR documents on the evening of 8/3/25, R1's pain was assessed to be a 7/10, severe pain.R1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 8/1/25-8/22/25, documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident (R2) from physical abuse by another resident (R1), reviewed for abuse, in a sample of seven.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident (R2) from physical abuse by another resident (R1), reviewed for abuse, in a sample of seven.FINDINGS INCLUDE:The facility policy, Abuse, Prevention and Prohibition Policy, dated 03/2025 directs staff, Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, corporal punishment and involuntary seclusion. Residents must not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the resident, family members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals.R1's facility form admission Record, documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Schizophrenia, Mood Disorder, Anxiety, Depression, Schizoaffective Disorder and Mild Intellectual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean and free of urine odor, resident room windows had privacy blinds or curtains in good repair, resident heating units were properly attached to the wall, and failed to ensure all resident rooms had adequate cooling for five of 18 residents (R4, R7, R9, R38 and R68) reviewed for homelike environment in the sample list of 40. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights policy dated 12/2024 documents it is the responsibility of the staff in the facility to provide services to the residents, and advocate for Resident Rights. 1.) 06/10/25 10:36 AM 06/09/25 11:17 AM R4 had two cardboard boxes taped to the window covering the windows with silver tape. On 6/10/25 at 12:10 PM, V20 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated there are cardboard boxes that cover windows because the windows let in hot/cold air. 06/09/25 11:00 AM, V5 (Maintenance Director) stated the blinds do not block out the sun, so residents will often ask to have boxes over the windows. V5 further stated the facility plans…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent abuse for one resident (R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of six. Findings include: The Initial Incident Report sent to (State agency) for 4/1/25 incident between R1 and R2 documents, (R1) allegedly walked a crossed the hallway to (R2's) room and swatted at (R2) while (R2) was in bed. The Final Incident Report sent to (State agency) for 4/1/25 incident between R1 and R2 documents, (R2) was lying in bed yelling out, as he does sometimes when he forgets to use the call light, and resident (R1) with dementia came in (R2's) room and swatted at (R2), (R1) left .right after, then staff came in and made sure he (R2) was okay. On 4/23/25 at 11:59 AM, V1/Administrator stated, (R2) was in his room in bed yelling for staff and (R1) went to (R2's) room to tell (R2) hush and swatted at (R2). (R1) swatted at (R2) more than once. V1 was asked if physical contact was made and V1 stated, Yes. On 4/24/25 at 11:20 AM, R2 stated, I had my call light on, but staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents consumed their medications for five residents (R1, R2, R3, R5 and R7) and the facility failed to have a physician's order for medication administered for one resident (R7) of 8 residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings Include: The Facility's Medication Administration policy dated 12/16/24 documents, Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological is given to a resident by an authorized person in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts. The complete act of administration entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a until dose container), verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident, and promptly recording the time and dose given. The Facility's Medication Administration policy documents, Observe the resident consume the medication to insure resident swallows medication. Never leave prepared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly store medications for 2 residents (R6 and R8) of seven residents reviewed for medication pass in a total sample of 8. Findings Include: The Facility's Procurement and Storage of Medication policy reviewed 12/16/24 documents, All medications, except those requiring refrigeration, shall be kept in the locked medicine room or locked medication cart. On 4/2/25 at 10:05 AM there were two albuterol inhalers each with over 100 doses left on R6's bedside table. The inhalers did not have any label on them with name or date dispensed. There was no one in the room. On 4/2/25 at 10:10 AM V5 (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed there were two albuterol inhalers on R6's bedside table. V5 stated R6 did not have an order for the albuterol inhaler. V5 stated, (R6) used to have an order for the inhalers. I don't know why he has some in his room, he shouldn't. On 4/2/25 at 10:15 AM there was a Combivent Inhaler on R8's bedside table. There was no one in the room. The inhaler had R8's name and dispensing information from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R1) was free from misappropriation of funds of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/2016 documents, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. This includes, but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of our residents. The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program also defines Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Observation, Interview and Record review, the facility failed to complete physician ordered wound treatments daily for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for Wound Care in the sample of three. Finding Include: The facility's Health Care Decubitus Care/Pressure Areas policy, dated 1/2018, documents, It is the policy of this facility to ensure a proper treatment program has been instituted and is being closely monitored to promote the healing of any pressure ulcer. Complete all areas of the Treatment Administration Record or Wound Documentation Record. Initiate physician order on the treatment sheet. Documentation of the pressure area must occur upon identification and at least once each week on the TAR (Treatment Administration Record) or Wound Documentation Form. On 11/4/2024, at 11:28 AM, R1 had a surgical wound to left stump that was red where sutures were, with minimal swelling. Wound was 3cm in length, 2cm in width, and was 1.2cm deep. Wound was bleeding and had blood dripping on the floor. R1 stated that the wound was sensitive to touch, and hurts when it is touched,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow Enhanced barrier precautions while performing wound care and follow hand hygiene for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for Wound Care, and Infection Control in a sample of three. Findings include: The Facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, dated 7/13/23, documents, Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) should be used when contact precautions do not apply, for residents with any of the following: Open wounds that require a dressing change. Enhance Barrier Precautions require use of a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for the transfer of MDRO's to staff hands and clothing. EBP is primarily intended to use for care that occurs within a resident's room, when high-contact resident care activities are bundled together. Outside of a resident's room, EBP should be followed when performing transfers in the shower/assisting with shower and when assisting a resident with toileting in common restrooms. High contact care activities include: Wound care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions and/or contact precautions were in place for six (R5, R8, R13, R16, R38, R43) of six residents reviewed for Infection Control) in the sample of 37. This failure has the potential to affect all 90 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings include: Facility Contact Precaution policy reviewed on 04/03/23 documents, In addition to Standard Precautions, use Contact Precautions or the equivalent for specified residents known or suspected to be infected or colonized with epidemiologically important microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident (hand or skin to skin contact that occurs when performing resident care activities that require touching the residents dry skin) or indirect contact (touching with environmental surfaces or resident care items in the residents environment). This policy also documents gowns and gloves should be used when entering resident rooms. Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy dated 07/13/23 documents, Purpose: To…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to monitor active infections in the facility and failed to implement their Antibiotic Stewardship Program. These failures have the potential to affect all 90 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings include: Facility Antibiotic Stewardship Program dated 11/1/17 documents, Purpose: To improve the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect residents and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance through a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing adverse events associated with antibiotic use. Infection Control Surveillance and Monitoring policy last reviewed by the facility on 12/7/18 documents, It is the policy of the facility to do routine surveillance and monitoring of the facility to determine if compliance with work practices and care of protective clothing and equipment is maintained. Procedure: Monitoring the effectiveness of the facility work practices and protective equipment will be conducted by the Administrator, ICP (Intervention Control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to issue a written Notification of Hospital Transfer upon Discharge for four (R38, R41, R51 and R61) of four Residents reviewed for hospitalization in the sample of 37. Findings include: 1.R51's Census List, dated 8/6/24, documents R51's Hospital Unpaid Leave dates of 4/13/24, 5/14/24, 5/18/24, 5/29/24 and 6/8/24. 2. The local hospital record for R38, document R38 was admitted to the local hospital on 6/4/24 through 6/8/24. The Dietary Progress Note for R38, dated 6/8/24, documents R38 returned to the facility after hospitalization. On 8/7/24 at 12:20 pm, V3 ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) confirmed R38 had a hospital stay, however, there are no Nursing Progress Notes documenting R38 had a hospitalization. 3. On 8/5/24 at 8:25 am, R41 stated he has been in and out of the hospital since his admission to the facility, always comes back, and does not have any complaints. The medical record for R41, documents R41 was sent to the local hospital on 1/8/24, 1/12/24, 3/13/24, 3/30/24, 6/11/24, and 7/30/24. R41 came back and does…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for eight of 19 residents (R16, R17, R21, R28, R33, R41, R43, R63) reviewed for care plans in the sample of 36. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy, revised 7/20/22, documents, It is the policy of (Name of Facility Organization) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each Resident admitted to this facility. The results of this Resident assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each Resident's strengths, needs, goals, life history and preferences to develop a person centered comprehensive plan of care for each Resident that will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the Resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being .The following procedures shall be utilized in the development and maintenance of care plans: 3.) Components of the CPC (Comprehensive Plan of Care) may include:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure physician orders were obtained, oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles were changed routinely and dated, oxygen signs were posted, and oxygen cylinders were stored safely for seven (R17, R28, R33, R38, R41, R48, R51) of seven residents reviewed for oxygen in a sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen Storage and Assembly policy, revised 01/02, documents, Policy: To properly store and assemble oxygen tanks and accessories in a safe and correct manner. This policy also states Safety and Storage of Oxygen Tanks: 1. Store tanks in a cool place away from a source of heat. 2. A chain, on a care or on a stand must secure tanks .5. Post oxygen safety warning sign outside the room where oxygen is stored or is in use. The facility's Oxygen Therapy policy, revised 8/03, documents, Note: Oxygen therapy may be used provided there is a written order by the physician. The order must state liter flow per minute, mask or cannula, time frame. On an emergency basis, oxygen may be administered until the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident Minimum Data Set/MDS Resident Assessments were completed correctly for two (R16 and R17) of two residents in a sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy, revised 7/20/22, documents, It is the policy of (named facility) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each Resident admitted to this facility. The results of this Resident assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each Resident's strengths, needs, goals, life history and preferences to develop a person centered comprehensive plan of care for each Resident that will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the Resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The Resident Assessment (RAI) shall be the guide utilized for all comprehensive assessments, care area assessments and care planning. 1. On 8/4/24, at 10:40am, R17 was in her room with oxygen infusing per nasal cannula. R17's Minimum Data Set/MDS assessments, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II screening for mental disorder was completed for one (R66) of one resident reviewed for PASRRs in a sample of 37. Findings include: R66's current Face sheet documents an admission date of 5/8/23. R66's Physician Order Sheet/POS, dated 5/8/23, documents diagnoses (including but not limited to) schizoaffective disorder. R66's Notice of PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level I Screen Outcome, dated 5/1/23, documents PASRR Level I Determination: No Level II Required - Situational Symptoms and Your Level I screen shows low-level behavioral health symptoms which appear to be situational. The nursing facility will watch your symptoms/behaviors to see if they improve or resolve within 30-60 days of this screen. If they do not, a nursing facility staff member must submit another Level I screen to maximus. This is called a status change. The status change will decide if you need a PASRR Level II evaluation for serious mental illness. This screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident Baseline Care plan includes oxygen for one (R28) of 19 residents reviewed for Care plans in a sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Care Plan policy, revised 1/11/23, documents, Purpose: To provide guidance to the facility in developing, implementation and communicating the individualized plan of care of residents.' On 8/4/24, at 6:25 am, R28 was in her room with oxygen infusing per nasal cannula. R28's Nurse's Note, dated 6/26/24, documents R28 arrived at the facility for admission with nasal oxygen via concentrator. R28's current Baseline Care plan does not document oxygen or any cares for oxygen. On 8/07/24, at 1:30pm, V23 Care Plan Coordinator confirmed that R28's Baseline care plan does not have oxygen on it. V23 stated, There is no place to mark it on the sheet. It should have been written in. V23 confirmed at this time that R28 was admitted to the facility with oxygen.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise resident Care Plans to reflect resident condition for three (R38, R41, and R43) of 19 residents reviewed for Care Planning in the sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy and procedure, revised 7/20/22, documents It is the policy of (the facility) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each Resident admitted to this facility. The CCP (Comprehensive Care Plan) shall be reviewed after each Annual, Significant Change and Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) and revised as necessary to reflect the resident's current medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs as identified by the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team). The Care Plan shall be revised as necessary when the needs/problems and care and services specified in the plan of care no longer reflect those of the Resident. The facility's Resident Weight Monitoring policy and procedure, revised 3/19, documents Significant changes in weights are documented in the care plan with goals and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and monitor pressure ulcers weekly and failed to perform hand hygiene in between glove changes for one (R16) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Decubitus Care/Pressure Areas policy and procedure, revised 1/18, documents, It is the policy of this facility to ensure a proper treatment program has been instituted and is being closely monitored to promote the healing of any pressure ulcer. Documentation of the pressure area must occur upon identification and at least once each week on the TAR (treatment administration record) or Wound Documentation Form. The facility's Hand Hygiene policy and procedure, updated 8/14/23, documents, All staff will comply with current CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) hand hygiene guidelines to reduce the incidence of healthcare associated infections. This policy documents hand washing should occur when hands are visibly soiled or contaminated with blood or other body fluids. After contact with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to investigate a resident fall and conduct a root cause analysis for one (R48) of two residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Accidents and Incidents policy and procedure, revised 9/6/23, documents, All accidents/incidents involving a resident shall require an incident report. The interdisciplinary team (IDT) will complete an investigation to determine root cause and implement appropriate interventions. It is the responsibility of the DON (Director of Nursing)/Designee to investigate and ensure appropriate completion, notification, and follow-up on all accidents and incidents. The Fall Risk Assessment for R48, dated 6/11/24 and 7/3/24 document R48 with a total score of 21 indicating R48 is a High risk for fall. A Quality Care Reporting Form for R48, dated 7/11/24 at 4:10 am, documents a CNA reported R48 had an alleged fall. This Form does not include any other fall details for R48's alleged fall. The Physician Progress Notes for R48, dated 6/14/24 and 7/30/24 do not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Registered Dietician recommendations were communicated to the Physician and failed to document daily weights on the Medication Administration Records for two (R41 and R48) of five residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Resident Weight Monitoring policy and procedure, revised 3/19, documents, It is the policy of (the facility) that resident weights are recorded and monitored at least monthly. Monthly weights are obtained by CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistants) or designated staff by the 5th of the month. Monthly weights are entered in the computer in batch by the Dietary Manager, Care Plan Coordinator, or designee. The Food Service Manager and interdisciplinary team review the resident's weights and nutritional status and make recommendations for intervention. The Dietitian shall review and document all significant weight changes along with any recommended nutritional interventions in the dietary progress notes in the medical record monthly. Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide gastrostomy feeding per order and provide gastrostomy tube care for one (R43) of two residents reviewed for enteral feedings in the sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Enteral Feeding policy and procedure, revised 2/08, documents, It is the policy of (the facility) to provide nutrition via Nasogastric or Gastrostomy tubes when ordered by physician. The resident may receive nutrition and hydration either by intermittent, continuous, or bolus feeding into the stomach by means of a tube when the oral route cannot be used. On 8/4/24 at 1:57 pm, An enteral feeding pump was resting in front of R43's bathroom door without a bottle hanging and not running. When writer asked R43 if she had a gastrostomy feeding tube, R43 raised her shirt to reveal a gastrostomy tube in her abdomen. The dressing covering R43's gastrostomy tube was undated and soiled a light tan at the split of the dressing. On this same date and time R43 stated she cannot remember when the dressing was changed last and stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at residents' bedside for one (R17) of 19 residents reviewed for medication storage in a sample of 37. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration policy, revised 11/18/17, documents, 14. Observe the resident consume the medication to insure resident swallows medication. Never leave prepared medications unattended. No medications should be left at bedside unless specifically ordered by the physician and then only in limited amounts as described by the physician. On 8/4/24, at 10:40 am, R17 was lying in bed with R17's pharmacy labeled Stiolto Inhaler and Ipratropium Nasal 0.06% spray resting on overbed table. At this time R17 stated, I can do my own inhalers. They just leave them here for me. R17's August 2024 POS/Physician Order Sheet documents orders for Ipratropium 0.06% Nasal for Atrovent Nasal Spray and Stiolto 2.5-2.5mcg/act (micrograms/activation) inhaler. R17's August 2024 POS/Physician Order Sheet does not include any order that allows R17 to keep any medications at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered Care Plan for one (R1) of four residents reviewed for Care Plans in a sample of four. Findings include: Facility Elopement Prevention Policy, revised 10/2006, documents: the Interdisciplinary Team/IDT will initiate a plan of care for any Resident determined high risk for elopement and specific measures will be included in each high risk Resident's plan of care to minimize risk factors and communication of these interventions will be made to direct care staff through exposure to the Resident's plan of care and periodic review; the plan of care for minimizing elopement risks will be reviewed each time the Risk Assessment is completed with initials and dating of the care plan by any member of the IDT present for review. Facility Care Plan Policy, revised 7/20/22, documents: it is the policy of the Facility to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each Resident admitted to the Facility; the results of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow their Abuse Prevention policy to perform a health care worker background check and failed to obtain a fingerprint based criminal history check of an employed unlicensed dietary aide with two disqualifying criminal offenses. These failures have the potential to affect all 89 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: The facility's Resident Directory dated 4-5-24 documents the facility's resident census as 89 residents currently residing within the facility. The facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy dated 11-28-26 documents, Pre-Employment Screening of Potential Employees. This facility will not knowingly employ any staff convicted of any of the crimes listed in the Illinois Healthcare Worker Background Check Act (unless waivered under the provision of the act), or with findings of abuse listed on the Illinois Health Care Worker Registry. Prior to a new employee starting a work schedule the facility will under the Health Care Worker Background Check Act and facility Criminal Background Check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that its medication cart was locked at all times when not in view, and failed to ensure Schedule II meds were double locked in the Medication Cart when the cart was not in view, per facility policy. This failure has the potential to affect five residents (R11, R12, R13, R14, and R15) of five residents reviewed for Pharmaceutical Services. Findings include: Procurement and Storage of Medications Policy darted 11/6/18, documents: 8. All medications, except those requiring refrigeration, shall be kept in the locked medicine room or locked medication cart. 10. Schedule II drugs are to be stored under double-lock subject to different key. Controlled Substances Policy dated 11/6/18 documents: Policy: It is the policy of the facility that all drugs listed as schedule II drugs are subject to specified handling, storage, disposal and record keeping. 1. Schedule II drugs are to be kept under two separate locks requiring two separate keys. A permanently affixed locked cabinet within the locked medication cart may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were showered twice weekly per their plan of care and their preferences for three of three residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living in the sample of three residents. 1. R1's Baseline Care Plan documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], is dependent on two staff for bathing, and dependent on one staff for grooming. The facility's Shower Log and R1's Shower/Abnormal Skin Reports dated 11-10-23 (Admission) through 11-28-23 document R1 has only had two baths/showers since R1's admission on [DATE] and document R1 has had no bath or shower since 11-17-23. On 11-28-23 at 8:45 AM R1 was lying in bed. R1's face had a dried crusty substance around his mouth and R1's hair was unkempt. R1's beard and mustache were grown out approximately a half an inch long. R1 stated, I have only had one shower since I have been here. I like to have a bath or shower at least three times a week and I like to be clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a registered nurse (RN) for eight hours in a 24-hour period, seven days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Facility Facility Assessment Tool, revised 8/15/23 documents the average daily census is 70-80 residents. Staffing Plan: The facility's plan to ensure sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents at any given time is based on the staffing calculator, which takes into consideration the facility census and acuity levels impacting staffing needs. Review expectations for minimum staffing requirements at the federal and state level. Federal law requires nursing homes to have sufficient staff to meet the needs of residents, to use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. Facility Nurse Staffing undated documents, It is the policy to provide sufficient licensed and unlicensed nursing staff on each shift of the day to attain or maintain the highest practical physical,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-21 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — widespreadHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to employ a qualified Social Service Director. This has the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Assessment Tool dated 8/15/23 documents the facility is licensed for 202 residents and documents that the facility provides services to patients having a variety of mental health illnesses as well as medical needs. The facility's Social Service Director Job Summary, undated, states, Job Summary: Assist in planning, developing, organizing, implementing, and directing social service programs in accordance with current existing federal, state, and local standards as well as our established policies and procedures in order to ensure that the medically related emotional and social needs of the resident are met and maintained on an individual basis. This same Job Summary documents general job duties: f. Evaluate social and family information and assist in determining plan for social treatment; g. Work with emotional problems including assisting resident/family with anxieties and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-21 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure that the designated Medical Director, designated Director of Nursing and designated Infection Preventionist was present at the Facility's Quality Assurance Meetings. This failure has the potential to affect all 81 Resident's residing in the Facility. Findings include: Facility Quality Assurance/QA Plan, undated, documents to continually improve the way Residents are cared for, safety and operations within the facility through the Quality Assurance process, Quality Assurance activities are to be completed continuously and objectively to provide a comprehensive review of the facility's activities; that the Facility will conduct a quarterly meeting (at the minimum); the Quality Assurance Committee reviews all the activities of daily Quality Assurance Team; and the Quality Assurance Committee will review patterns or trends, areas identified for improvement and make recommendations as needed. Facility's Resident Census and Condition Report, dated 9/18/23, documents 81 Residents residing in the Facility. The Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to thoroughly monitor active infections in the facility and failed to implement their Antibiotic Stewardship Program. These failures have the potential to affect all 81 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: The Facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program dated 3/20/23 documents the purpose of the program is, To improve the use of Antibiotics in healthcare to protect residents and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance through a set of commitments and actions designed to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing adverse events associated with antibiotic use. This will be accomplished utilizing the Core Elements. Tracking: Monitor at least one process measure of antibiotic use and at least one outcome from antibiotic use. The Facility's Infection Control Surveillance and Monitoring Policy dated 12/7/18 documents the Director of Nursing updates the Infection Control Log on a daily basis in order to analyze data and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a Comprehensive Care Plan for Hospice services for two residents (R36 and R52); Care Plan for PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) for one resident (R64) and Care Plan for smoking, weight loss, and risk for urinary tract infection for one resident (R131) of 20 residents reviewed for care planning in the sample of 39. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy and procedure, revised 7/20/22, documents It is the policy of (the facility) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each resident admitted to this facility. The results of this resident assessment shall serve as the basis for determining each resident's strengths, needs, goals, life history and preferences to develop a person centered comprehensive plan of care for each resident that will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) shall be developed within 7 days of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to revise resident care plans for five (R8, R36, R52, R54, R64) of 20 residents reviewed for care planning in the sample of 39. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy and procedure, revised 7/20/22, documents, It is the policy of (the facility) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each Resident admitted to this facility. It is to be noted that the Care Plan is for planning care and services. The CCP (Comprehensive Care Plan) shall be reviewed after each Annual, Significant Change and Quarterly MDS (minimum data set) and revised as necessary to reflect the resident's current medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs as identified by the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team). The Care Plan shall be revised as necessary when the needs/problems and care and services specified in the plan of care no longer reflect those of the Resident. On 9/20/23 at 8:50 am, V4 CPC (Care Plan Coordinator) stated the Nurses and Management staff are responsible to update the resident Care Plans for any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to offer and/or administer Influenza and Pneumonia Vaccinations for four residents (R12, R44, R49 and R77) of five reviewed for immunizations in a total sample of 39. Findings Include: The Facility's Immunization of Residents dated 5/19/23 documents (This Facility) will offer immunizations and vaccinations that aid in the prevention of infectious diseases unless medically contraindicated or otherwise ordered by the resident's attending physician or the facility's medical director. Assess all newly admitted residents' pneumococcal and influenza vaccination status upon admission and record last known immunization on the resident's Immunization Record. Offer the Pneumococcal vaccination within 30 days of admission. Offer the influenza immunization annually from September 1st through March 31st. R12's Immunization Record has no information under Influenza or Pneumococcal Vaccination. R44's Immunization Record has no information under Influenza or Pneumococcal Vaccination. R49's Immunization Record has no information under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to monitor unwitnessed fall injuries and initiate fall interventions (R64) and assess for Smoking Safety and Smoking assistance (R131) for two of six residents reviewed for accidents in a sample of 39. Findings include: 1. Facility Fall Prevention Policy, revised 11/10/18, documents: to provide for resident safety and to minimize injuries related to falls; decrease falls and still honor each resident's wishes/desires for maximum independence and mobility; immediately after any resident fall the Unit Nurse will assess the Resident and provide any care or treatment needed for the resident; a fall huddle will be conducted with staff on duty to help identify circumstances of the event and appropriate interventions; the Unit Nurse will place documentation of the circumstances of a fall in the Nurses Notes or on an AIM for Wellness form along with any new intervention deemed to be appropriate at the time. Facility Skin Condition Policy, revised 1/2018, documents: It is the policy of the Facility to provide proper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and put on Personal Protective Equipment upon entering an Enhanced Barrier Precautions room of residents with suprapubic indwelling urinary catheters for two residents (R26 and R33) of six residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters in a sample of 39. Findings include: The Facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy dated 7/13/23 documents: the purpose is to reduce transmission of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms/MDRO. Enhance Barrier Precautions/EBP should be used when contact precautions do not apply, for residents with any of the following: Indwelling Medical Devices and Infection or Colonized with a MDRO; EBP requires the use of a gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for the transfer of MDRO's to staff hands and clothing; EBP is primarily intended to use for care that occur within a resident's room; this same Policy documents high-contact care activities that include caring for medical devices such as urinary catheters; the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow their Resident Weight Monitoring policy and procedure for two (R54 and R131) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 39. Findings include: The facility's Resident Weight Monitoring policy and procedure, revised 3/2019, documents It is the policy of (the facility) that resident weights are recorded and monitored at least monthly. Procedure: 1. New admission weight is obtained within 24 hours of admit and on the following two consecutive days after admission by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) as directed by nurse 3. Monthly weights are entered in the computer in batch by the Dietary Manager, Care Plan Coordinator, or designee . 5. If the monthly weight shows a significant change in 30 days (i.e 5. % +/-) the resident will be re-weighed. Re-weights are done by CNA or designated staff. Re-weights are again reviewed, and entered in the computer by the Dietary Manager, Care Plan coordinator or designee. 6. Monthly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess a resident for Post Traumatic Stress disorder/PTSD for one of two residents (R50) reviewed for PTSD in a sample of 39. Findings Include: The Facility's Trauma Informed Care Policy dated 8/23/23 documents the purpose of the policy is to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. Upon admission the Social Service Director will review hospital discharge records and interview the resident or the resident's representative to determine any history of trauma. The Social Service Director will complete a Trauma Informed Care Screen to evaluate for any history of a traumatic experience that a resident may have had. The Facility's Trauma Informed Care Policy dated 8/23/23 documents, Residents will be assessed for any history of trauma annually, quarterly and with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications to one resident at a time for three residents (R17, R36, R61) of 19 residents reviewed for medications in the sample of 39. The Facility's Medication Administration Policy dated 11/18/17 documents, Drug administration shall be defined as an act in which a single dose of a prescribed drug or biological is given to a resident by an unauthorized person in accordance with all laws and regulations governing such acts. The complete act of administrations entails removing an individual dose from a previously dispensed, properly labeled container (including a unit dose container) verifying it with the physician's orders, giving the individual dose to the proper resident, and promptly recording the time and dose given. On 9/19/23 at 12:30 PM V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was walking in the dining room with three clear medicine cups stacked on each other in one hand. None of the clear cups in V6's hand were labeled in any way as to which medicine cup belonged to which resident. V6 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to address Medication Reconciliation Reports for two residents (R12 and R49) of five residents reviewed for medication review in a total sample of 39. Findings Include: The Facility's Consultant Reports policy dated 1/6/10 documents, It is the policy of (this facility) that any consultant reports with irregularities be reported to the resident's attending Physician and Director of Nursing and the report must be acted upon. The resident's attending Physician will review the consultant reports for acceptance or rejection and check the form accordingly. 1. R12's Consultation Report dated 6/8/23-6/9/223 documents, (R12) receives dual antiplatelet therapy with Aspirin Low Dose and Clopidogrel and does not have a CBC (Complete Blood Count) documented in the medical record within the previous 6 months. Recommendation: Please monitor a CBC on the next convenient lab day and every 6 months thereafter. Consider routine fecal occult blood tests, if clinical indicated (e.g., every 6 months for those at high risk for GI (Gastrointestinal)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to identify target behaviors for use of psychotropic medications for three residents (R12, R50 and R54) and failed to determine the origin of a psychosis diagnosis for one resident (R54) of five residents reviewed for mood and behavior in a total sample of 39. Findings Include: The Facility's Psychotropic Medication Policy documents It is the policy of this facility that residents shall not be given unnecessary drugs. Unnecessary drug is any drug used: 1. in an excessive dose, including in duplicative therapy 2. For excessive duration 3. Without adequate monitoring 4. Without adequate indications for its use 5. In the presence of adverse consequences that indicate the drugs should be reduced or discontinued. That these medications be withheld if the resident is lethargic and/or exhibiting signs of over sedation and the physician will be contacted if these conditions persist. These medications will not be given solely for staff convenience, This same policy also documents any resident receiving such medications shall have a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's complete/accurate medical records and thinned records were easily assessable for two (R26, R54) of two residents reviewed for medical records in the sample of 39. Findings include: The facility's undated Thinning Current Resident Records policy and procedure, documents, Information contained in the medical records of current residents will be thinned regularly. Once the information is removed, it will be filed chronologically in a 'thinned' folder or envelope. All information will be maintained in such a manner that it is easily accessible upon request from properly authorized persons such as nursing staff or surveyors. Information which must remain in the record and is never thinned. 1. admission record/admission transfer form. 2. Physician admission orders. 3. Original assessments by all disciplines. 4. Nursing admission assessment and nursing note. 5. History and physical examination. The facility's undated, Schedule for Thinning policy, documents, History and Physical is never removed, MD (Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written reason for residents' transfers to the hospital for evaluation and treatment to residents' representatives. This has the potential to affect all 82 residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: On 8/15/23 at 12:03 PM, V1 (Administrator in Training) stated written reasons for residents' transfers to the hospital are not provided to resident representatives. V1 stated resident representatives are only notified verbally. V1 stated, It is not a requirement that we do (notify resident representatives in writing). 1. R1's Profile Face Sheet documents V7 as R1's Family Member/Power of Attorney/POA. R1's current Power of Attorney for Health Care documents V7 as R1's POA. R1's Nursing Note on 6/18/23 (no time) documents R1 was sent to the local area hospital due to a change in condition. R1 is documented as not responding to questions, staring when questions are asked, jittery and lips quivering. R1's Nursing Note on 7/15/23 (no time) documents R1 was sent to the local area hospital due to altered mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide the services of a registered nurse eight hours a day, seven days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility's Facility Assessment Tool reviewed 8/15/23 documents the facility with an average daily census of 70-80 residents. This same Facility Assessment states, Federal law requires nursing homes to have sufficient staff to meet the needs of residents, to use the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The facility's Nurse Staffing Policy reviewed 12/7/17 documents the facility will provide sufficient licensed nursing staff on each shift of the day to attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The facility's Nurse's Daily Assignment Sheets document the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of registered nurse (RN) coverage in the building to provide services on the following dates: 7/1/23; 7/4/23; 7/8/23; 8/5/23;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure contact isolation precautions were initiated for one of four residents (R4) reviewed for change in condition in the sample of four. This failure has the potential to affect all 82 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Contact Precautions Policy reviewed 4/3/23 states, In addition to Standard Precautions, use Contact Precautions, or the equivalent for specified residents known or suspected to be infected or colonized with epidemiologically important microorganisms that can be transmitted by direct contact with the resident (hand or skin to skin contact that occurs when performing resident care activities that require touching the residents dry skin) or indirect contact (touching with environmental surfaces or resident care items in the residents environment). This same policy documents gown and gloves will be worn when entering the resident's room. The CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow facility policies to monitor antibiotic use to ensure proper antibiotic prescription and to identify antibiotic use trends to improve resident outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance. This has the potential to affect all 82 residents in facility. Findings include: The facility's Assessment of Infections and Antimicrobial Usage Policy reviewed 3/20/23 states, Assessing antimicrobial use is essential for determining antimicrobial use trends. Antimicrobial use should be reviewed regularly to measure progress of antimicrobial stewardship activities. After completing the review, the facility should be able to describe who is getting antibiotics and why. Additionally, the results are useful to identify gaps in communication, inconsistencies in documentation, and compliance with facility policies and evidence-based recommendation for antimicrobial prescribing. The policy further documents, Assessment: 1. Obtain the list of antimicrobials monthly. 2. For the first antibiotic on the list note the resident name, date of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-17 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a trained Infection Control Preventionist (ICP). This failure has the potential to affect all 82 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: The facility's Infection Control Surveillance and Monitoring Policy, revised 4/11/22, states, It is the policy of the facility to do routine surveillance and monitoring of the facility to determine if compliance with infection control practices is maintained. The facility shall employ, at a minimum, a part time Infection Control Preventionist (ICP). These duties may be performed by the Director of Nursing (DON) with an approved Infection Control Certification. This same policy documents that the DON/ICP will: Investigate and implement controls to prevent infections in the facility; Direct the correct procedures to prevent the spread of infections; Follows up on documentation and reporting of infections to the physicians; Maintains programs that prohibits employees with communicable diseases from direct resident contact; Maintains and enforces hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's Power of Attorney/Representative of a resident room change and of transfers to the hospital after a change in condition for two of four residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for notification of change in the sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Room Move Policy revised 9/17/18 states, It is the policy of (name of facility Corporation) to notify a resident, resident's roommate/s, and resident representative of any room move with as much advance notice as the situation allows. The residents, the resident's representative and the roommate/s have the right to know why the move is being made. The facility will take the residents preferences into account when those moves are made. Procedure: 1. With as much advanced notice as possible, notify the resident, resident representative, and the roommate of any impending room moves. 2. Fill out the Resident Notification of Room/Roommate Change form and have the resident/responsible party…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for a resident's Anticoagulant Use, Oxygen Use, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition in the sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning policy, dated 7/20/22, documents It is the policy of (name of facility company) to comprehensively assess and periodically reassess each resident admitted to this facility. The results of this resident assessment shall serve as the basis for determining resident strengths, needs, goals, life history and preferences to develop a comprehensive plan of care for each resident that will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintaining the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Comprehensive Care Plans shall strive to describe: b. The resident's medical, nursing, physical, mental and psychosocial needs and preferences. c. Person centered measurable objectives and timeframe's for ease of evaluating resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a resident's care plan for one of four residents (R4) reviewed for change in condition in the sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Comprehensive Care Planning Policy, revised 7/20/22, documents the Comprehensive Care Plan shall be revised as necessary to reflect the resident's current medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. R4's Current Care Plan documents R4 with altered elimination initiated on 11/21/22 with a goal to be free from infection for 90 days initiated on 2/19/23. R4's Urine Culture result reported on 7/28/23 documents a result of Escherichia coli ESBL (Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase). This same culture result states, Confirmed ESBL producing organism. R4's Physician Order Sheet/POS dated 7/01/23-7/31/23 documents orders on 7/30/23 to send R4 to the ER/emergency room for placement of a PICC/Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Line related to urinalysis culture and sensitivity results and for a Urology Consult. R4's After Visit Summary/AVS from the local area hospital on 7/30/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician of a resident's continued complaints of pain with urination after completion of oral antibiotics for a urinary tract infection (R4), failed to ensure physician orders for a PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) Line and Urology Consult were completed timely (R4) and failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were maintained for a resident with an indwelling urinary catheter during catheter care (R1) for two of four residents (R1 and R4) reviewed for change in condition in the sample of four. Findings include: 1. The facility's Notification for Change in Resident Condition or Status Policy, revised 12/7/17 documents the facility and/or facility staff shall promptly notify appropriate individuals, including the physician of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. This same policy states, Procedure: The nurse supervisor/charge nurse will notify the resident's attending…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-17 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident laboratory result values were reported to the physician in a timely manner for two of four residents (R1 and R3) reviewed for notification of change in laboratory results in the sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Notification for Change in Resident Condition or Status Policy revised 12/7/17 documents the facility and/or facility staff shall promptly notify appropriate individuals, including the physician of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. This same policy states, Procedure: The nurse supervisor/charge nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or on-call physician when there has been: m. Abnormal lab findings. 3. Except in medical emergencies, notifications will be made within twenty-four hours of a change occurring in the resident's medical/mental condition or status. The facility's Laboratory Tests Policy reviewed 9/27/17 states, Appropriate laboratory monitoring of disease processes and medications require consideration of many factors including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to perform a pressure ulcer wound treatment as ordered for one of two residents (R12) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 33. Findings Include: The facility policy titled Skin Condition Monitoring, dated 1/2018, documents It is the policy of this facility to provide proper monitoring, treatment, and documentation of any resident with skin abnormalities. On 10/4/2022 at 10:47 AM V7/LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) performed wound care on (R12) coccyx area. Cleansed area with a wound cleanser, area was patted dry, and Alginate Calcium with Silver (topical wound dressing) with a secondary dressing of gauze island border was applied. Wound size measured approximately 1.5 cm x 0.5 cm (centimeters) with yellow - tannish dead tissue in the wound bed. Peri-wound is red. (R12) Wound Evaluation and Management Summary, dated 10/4/2022, documents, (R12) has a stage 4 pressure wound on coccyx for at least 53 days duration. There is moderate serosanguinous exudate. (R12) TAR (Treatment Administration Record), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to justify duplicative antipsychotic therapy of three antipsychotics, failed to obtain a physician ordered psychiatric evaluation and failed to document a clinically indicated diagnosis and adverse behaviors to warrant the use of an antipsychotic for two of three residents (R15, R27) reviewed for antipsychotic medications in the sample of 33. Findings include: 1. The facility's Psychotropic Medication policy, dated 6/17/22, documents, It is the policy of this facility that residents shall not be given unnecessary drugs. Unnecessary drug is any drug used: In an excessive dose, including duplicative therapy and without adequate indications for its use. These medications will not be given solely for staff convenience. Definition of duplicative drug therapy: Any drug therapy that duplicates a particular drug effect on the resident without any demonstrative therapeutic benefit. For example, any two or more drugs, whether from the same drug category or not, that have a sedative effect. This policy also documents Any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-09-21 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the required nurse staffing information. This has the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Facility Facility Assessment Tool, dated 8/15/23 documents, Review expectations for minimum staffing requirements at the federal and state level. During the hours of 9/18/23 at 6:00 am through 9/20/23 at 1:00 pm the facility did not have the required nurse staffing information posted. On 9/20/23 at 1:05 pm, V2 DON/Director of Nursing stated I don't post any staffing information outside of my door, or the nurses desk. What is it you are looking for? I have seen the daily nurse staffing sheet posted in other buildings but not here. We do not post in the lobby or out front. On 9/21/22 at 1:30pm, V1 Administrator in Training stated, I did not know we were supposed to post nurse staffing information and I have been an administrator for about two years. Facility Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 9/18/23, documents 81 residents reside in the facility.
- No harm found · B2023-08-17 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Notice of Bed Hold Policy to a resident and/or resident's representative upon discharge to the hospital for two of four residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for change in condition in the sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Bed Hold Guarantee Policy revised 8/1/17 documents a resident who is discharged to an acute care setting has a bed reserved for his/her return. Beds shall be held for ten days for hospitalizations. This same policy states, The resident, resident family or legal representative will be given the appropriate Notice of Bed Hold Policy at the time of discharge or therapeutic leave, if possible, but notice will be given no longer than 24 hours after discharge or initiation of leave. On 8/15/23 at 12:03 PM, V1 (Administrator in Training) stated the facility's Notice of Bed Hold Policy should be sent with resident's at the time of discharge for acute care transfers. V1 stated V4 (Social Service Director) sends the notices. On 8/15/23 at 12:35 PM, V4 (Social Service Director) denied giving Bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$260,624 in federal fines across 7 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $64,120 — penalty dated 2026-03-28
- $16,965 — penalty dated 2024-12-12
- $31,993 — penalty dated 2024-10-04
- $52,679 — penalty dated 2024-07-25
- $22,950 — penalty dated 2024-03-13
- $62,654 — penalty dated 2023-11-17
- $9,263 — penalty dated 2023-09-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-29 for 25 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-07 for 9 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-15 for 32 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $806K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145275. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.