Sharon Health Care Elms
3611 North Rochelle, Peoria, IL 61604 · For profit - Corporation · 96 certified beds · (309) 688-4412 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $185,971 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-22)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.6% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.4% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 91.7% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 8.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.5% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 29.0% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.0% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 27.2% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 88.9% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.3% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 22.7% | 13.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.98 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.53 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 32 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 4.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.1%CMS range 26.1–56.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 5.4–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 4.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 2.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 9.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 4.9–15.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 71.2 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.52 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident received adequate supervision and dietary management to prevent a choking incident for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for choking in the sample of six. These failures resulted in the resident (R2) consuming food inconsistent with his prescribed mechanical soft diet, leading to a fatal choking event at the facility.These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy that began on 7/23/25. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 12/17/25, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity level two. Additional time is needed to monitor the effectiveness of the implementation of protocols and oversight visits.Findings include: The facility's undated policy titled Food Brought in by Visitors documents that visitors must notify nursing staff prior to providing outside food to a resident. The policy further documents that nursing staff are responsible for confirming whether the food complies with the resident's prescribed diet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-05-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately supervise a resident (R1) to prevent resident-to-resident physical abuse for five of five residents (R1-R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of five. These failures resulted in R1 punching R2 in the left eye, causing a hematoma under R2's left eye and bruising surrounding R2's left eye, and R1 punching R5 in the right arm, causing R5 right arm pain for three days. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy undated documents, Policy: The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, neglect,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety after a transfer and failed to keep a resident free from injury for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for accidents/injuries in a sample of four. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining pain, bruising and a hospital visit with fractures to the left ankle and foot. Findings include: The facility's undated Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities documents Your rights to safety: The facility must provide services to keep your physical and mental health, at their highest practical levels. The facility's Resident Accident/Incident Policy, revised 5/12/15, documents It is the Policy of (named facility) to provide a safe environment for all residents. We understand there will be a time when our best efforts will not be enough. Accidents will happen. Residents will fall. The facility's Fall Policy and Procedure, revised 1/2/19, documents It is the Policy of (named facility) to provide an environment conducive to reducing risk for falls. (Named facility) provides…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident with the required mechanical lift, for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 falling twice and during the second fall sustaining a periprosthetic distal left femur fracture, ongoing pain, and psychosocial fear of being transferred with a mechanical lift. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Fall Policy and Procedure directs staff, It is the policy of (the facility) to provide an environment conducive to reducing risk for falls. (The facility) provides interventions to reduce risk factors for falling .Should the resident be observed sitting on the floor or being assisted by staff to sit down on the floor, the nurse will be notified and a fall report will be completed R1's current facility Face Sheet documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a fall with a Left Hip Fracture. This same form includes the following diagnoses: Cerebral Palsy,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Failures at this level required more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to conduct a resident assessment to determine the resident's degree of mobility, physical impairment and the proper transfer method needed once a resident experienced increased weakness. The facility also failed to maintain an adequate working electrical supply to adjust an electric bed into the lowest position prior to a transfer for one resident (R9) and failed to implement appropriate fall interventions for one resident (R8.) These failures affect two of three residents (R8, R9) reviewed for falls in the sample of 27. These failures resulted in R9 losing grip of the sit-to-stand mechanical lift handles and falling to the floor, sustaining a coccyx fracture and severe pain that required hospitalization. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess the smoking safety yearly for one of five residents (R40) reviewed for smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat, monitor, and prevent new and worsening pressure ulcers that required surgical debridement for one (R69) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 26. This failure resulted in house acquired pressure ulcers and worsening pressure ulcers, that required surgical debridement for R69. Findings include: Facility Pressure Ulcer and Skin Care Management Policy, effective 3/2000, documents: a resident who enters the facility without pressure ulcers does not develop pressure ulcers; a resident having pressure ulcers receives treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and reduce the risk of new pressure ulcers developing; a licensed nurse checks the resident's body for the presence of pressure ulcers, wounds and other skin conditions on admission and weekly; the presence of any pressure ulcer, wound or other skin condition is documented weekly on pressure ulcer or skin report forms in the progress notes and care plan; implements treatment procedures in accordance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to investigate and prevent multiple injuries for one resident (R44) of three residents reviewed for wounds from injury in the sample of 26. This failure resulted in an infection of an elbow wound requiring antibiotics and isolation precautions. The facility also failed to use the assessed number of individuals needed to transfer residents for two residents (R57 and R322) of eight residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 26. Findings include: 1) Facility Policy/Resident Accident/Incident Policy dated/revised 8/22/21 documents: It is the policy of (the facility) to provide a safe environment for all residents. Residents that end up with an unexplained bruise or skin tear will be investigated to ensure there has been no abuse. On a daily basis incidents/accidents will be investigated and reviewed by the facility administrative staff. Necessary intervention changes will be made in the resident's care plan. The ADON (Assistant Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act quickly to get medical care for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for injuries in a sample of four. This failure resulted in R1 continuing to be in pain at the nursing home after an incident that caused facial and body bruising for four and a half hours before the emergency personnel were summoned to the nursing home.Findings include: Facility Change of Condition Policy and Procedure, undated, documents The Facility shall promptly notify the resident his/her attending physician of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or on-call physician when there has been: An accidents or incident involving the resident; A discovery of injuries of an unknown source; and A need to transfer the resident to a hospital /treatment center.Facility medical record for R1 documents R1 was sent to the (local) hospital on 2/24/26.Facility Nursing Note for R1, dated 2/24/2026 at 8:21AM by V5 RN/Registered Nurse, documents the following: This nurse observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy for reducing falls and using a portable lifting machine for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for accident/incidents in a sample of four. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining multiple bruises to her face and body, and pain which required R1 to be transferred to the hospital.Findings include: Facility Using a Portable Lifting Machine, dated May 2008, documents The primary purpose of using a portable lifting machine is to help lift residents who may be too heavy to lift. The portable lift is also used to promote comfort and to maintain good body alignment while the resident is being moved. This procedure requires the assistance of two (2) persons.Facility Fall Policy and Procedure, revised 1/2/2019, documents It is the Policy of (nursing home) to provide an environment conducive to reducing risk for falls. (Nursing home) provides interventions to reduce risk factors for falling.Facility medical record for R1 documents R1 was sent to the (local) hospital on 2/24/26. Facility Mobility Assessment for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date multi-use medications upon opening, discard expired medications, and double lock controlled substances for seven residents (R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13) reviewed for medication storage in a sample of 13. Findings Include:The facility's Storage of Medications policy (not dated) documents, No discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals may be retained for use. All such drugs must be returned to the issuing pharmacy or destroyed in accordance with our established procedures governing the destruction of medication. 14. All controlled substances must be stored under double lock and key.The facility's Labeling of Drugs and Medications policy (not dated) documents, All drugs and biologicals must be properly labeled and legible at all times. 11. f. Other as appropriate or necessary.On 12/15/2025 at 11:00 AM, a facility medication cart contained: R7's opened Lantus vial with no documented date of when it was opened; R8's opened insulin garlgine vial with no documented date of when it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow Physician ordered wound treatments and implement Registered Dietician recommendations for wound healing for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of 13. Finding Include:The facility's Physician's Order Policy (not dated) documents, The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for the ordering, processing, and management of physician's orders in a long-term care facility, ensuring compliance with State and Federal regulations, and promoting the health and safety of residents. Order implementation, orders must be implemented promptly by licensed nursing staff according to the facility's protocols. The facility's Pressure Ulcer Preventive Measures policy (not dated) documents, Residents at risk for the development of pressure ulcers receive interventions to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers. Procedure: 26. Maintain adequate intake of protein, calories, and fluids by offering support with eating. 27. Provide nutritional support and/or food supplements (protein, calories, vitamin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow Registered Dietician recommendations to obtain weekly weights to monitor for and prevent further weight loss for one (R1) of four residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of six. Findings include:R1's Care Plan, dated 12/22/2025 documents, R1 has had a significant weight loss 6.1% (percent) in one month weight 153.3 lbs. (pounds), R1 eats 50% sometimes less. R1 will get up from table before completing his meals. R1's significant weight loss 10.7% (percent) in three out of six months (December 2024-March 2025).R1's Registered Dietician note dated 1/24/2025 documents, Weight on 12/16/2024, 163 lbs. (pounds), weight on 1/10/2025, 153 lbs. Weight change: weight loss of 10 lbs/6.1% (percent) in one month. Recommendation: weekly weight.R1's Weight Summary, dated 1/2025, documents R1's weight was only obtained once during the month of January on 1/10/2025 (153.3lbs (pounds)).R1's Registered Dietician note dated 2/26/2025 documents, Nutritional weight change note, weight 145.8 lbs. (pounds), more than 30-day weight of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-11-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an Infection Control log for June, July, August and September of 2025. This failure has the potential to affect all 69 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:The facility's Resident Roster dated 9/16/25 was provided by V1/Administrator and documents 69 residents reside in the facility at the time of the survey.The facility's undated Infection Control Protocol and Antibiotic Stewardship policy documents, The Infection Control Preventionist/Antibiotic Stewardship Leader will track all Facility Infections, monthly laboratory organism reporting . On 9/18/25, V2 Infection Preventionist and DON/Director of Nursing could not provide a complete list of residents currently on isolation precautions including Enhanced Barrier Precaution/EBP, Contact or Droplet isolation, or an Infection Control Log for June, July, August, or September 2025. On 9/16/25 at 2:45pm V2 stated she was the facility's Infection Preventionist and produced the certificate of completion of the Infection Prevention Program Training dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain one resident's (R23) room in good repair of 24 residents' rooms observed during the initial tour for maintenance in a sample of 28. Findings include:R23 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Malignant Neoplasm of the Right Lung.R23's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R23 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, no cognitive impairments.On 9/16/25 at 9:40 AM, R23's window ledge was broken off, had sharp hard edges and had exposed wood. Heat from the outdoors could be felt through the broken area.R23 stated she can feel the wind come through the window and the ledge had been broke since admission approximately nine months ago. R23 stated her room would get cold in the wintertime due to the broken window ledge.On 9/18/25 at 11:30 AM, V20 (Maintenance Director) stated he was unaware of R23's broken window ledge. V20 stated the residents' rooms had been renovated and windows had been replaced over the past year or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained and the physician was notified of weight gains per Physicians Order. The facility also failed to monitor weights for discrepancies for one of three residents (R19) with daily weights in a sample of 28. Findings include:The facility's Weight policy, revised 5/18/25, documents the purpose of this policy is to monitor the residents' weights, and track weight changes as they occur.The facility's Documentation Guidelines policy, revised 3/14/17, documents, Not documented, not done, and document facts.R19's Physician Order, dated 2/27/25, documents to weigh R19 daily related to R19's diagnosis of congestive heart failure and to notify the physician if R19's weight gain is greater than three pounds (lbs.) in a day or five pounds in a week.R19's Weight Summary, dated 6/1/25 to 9/17/25, has no documentation of R19's daily weights being obtained for 28 out of the 59 days during the time span of 6/1/25 through 9/15/25. R19's Weight Summary also documents daily weight gain fluctuations varying from 13.6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to initiate Enhanced Barrier Precautions for two residents (R66, R2) out of five residents reviewed in a total sample of 28. Findings include: The facility's undated Enhanced Barrier Policy documents, Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents at increased risk of MDRO (Multidrug-resistant organism) acquisition (e.g., residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). 1. R2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Encephalopathy, Lymphedema, Sepsis, Cellulitis Right lower Limb, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Failure to Thrive. R2's current Care Plan documents R2 has actual impairment to skin integrity of the (bilateral) legs related to lymphedema. R2's Hospital records documented on 8/24/25 R2 was admitted to the hospital from the facility with diagnoses of right lower leg cellulitis resulting in Sepsis (Life-threatening condition to an infection which can cause…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and glove changes during pressure ulcer treatments. The facility also failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were completed as ordered. These failures effect three of three residents (R2, R3, R4) reviewed for pressure ulcers in a sample of four. Findings include: The facility's undated Wound Care policy documents Purpose: To provide guidelines for the care of wounds and soiled dressings to decrease the potential for nosocomial infections. Steps in the Procedure: 1. Wash your hands thoroughly before beginning the procedure. 11. Put on exam glove. Loosen tape and remove dressing. 12. Pull glove over dressing and discard into appropriate receptacle. Wash hands. 13. Put on disposable gloves. 14. Use no-touch technique. Use tongue blades and applicators to remove ointments and creams from their containers. 15. Pour liquid solutions directly on gauze sponges. 17. Cleanse wound with solution. 20. Dress wound. [NAME] tape with initials, time, and date and apply to dressing. 21. Pick up soiled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-08 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a bed hold notification to the resident or resident representative for four of four residents (R6, R9, R11, R46) reviewed for hospital transfers in the sample of 27. Findings include: The facility's Bed Reserve policy, undated, documents Notification Process: All residents will be provided notification of bed reserve policy upon admission. In addition, a copy of the policy will be provided upon hospitalization along with other pertinent documents. Responsible parties will be notified by phone of the bed reserve policy within 24 hours. 1. R6's Census List, dated 10/8/2024, documents R6 was discharged to the hospital on 3/6/24, 3/9/24, and 5/13/24. There was no evidence in R6's medical record of a bed hold notification given to R6 or R6's representative for 3/6/24, 3/9/24, and 5/13/24. 2. R9's Census List, dated 10/8/2024, documents R9 was discharged to the hospital on 7/9/24, 7/19/24, 9/8/24, 9/16/24, and 9/19/24. There was no evidence in R9's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a Care Plan for pain for one resident (R4) of 24 residents reviewed for pain in the sample of 27. Findings include: The Care Plan Policy dated 6/1/23 documents Residents admitted to the facility will have a care plan initiated within 48 hours of admission and completed no later than 21 days after admission. Care plans are revised at least quarterly, whenever there is a significant change in the patient's condition and on an as needed basis. Patients receive care and treatment based on an assessment of their needs, the severity of their disease, condition, impairment, or disability. The data obtained from the assessment is used to determine and prioritize the patients plan of care. The development, implementation, and maintenance of a patient's plan of care is an interdisciplinary process. All disciplines involved in the care of a patient collaborate to develop the care plan. Each healthcare team member provides input based on comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide monitoring and documentation of dialysis access site observations, failed to provide communication with the dialysis center, failed to identify type of dialysis access site/device, failed to provide a current/valid dialysis contract and failed to develop and implement a policy and procedure for residents receiving offsite dialysis for one resident (R60) of one resident reviewed for Hemodialysis in the sample of 27. Findings include: No Policy and Procedure for the care of a Dialysis resident residing at the facility was provided during the survey. On 10/6/24 at 10:30am V1, Administrator confirmed only one resident (R60) in the facility received dialysis. R60's Current Physician Orders indicate R60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease, Cardiac Arrest and Diabetes Mellitus. R60's orders include One time a day every Monday, Wednesday and Friday related to End Stage Renal disease.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store all controlled medications (schedule II medications) in a secured locked box in the medication cart and failed to destroy all controlled medications once discontinued for four of four residents (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Schedule II Drug Inventory policy dated 03/2000 documents, Procedure: Maintain a declining inventory record by resident by drug on all schedule II drugs. Records must be accurate. Reconcile the declining inventory record at the end of each shift. Reconciliation is performed by a physical count of the remaining medication by two persons who are legally authorized to administer medications. Store all controlled drugs in a separate locked box within the medication cart. The facility's High-Alert Medications policy (undated) documents, When an opioid or narcotic medication is discontinued, it shall be destroyed in the presence of two nurses and a destruction log completed. Verification at shift turnover occurs when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to immediately remove a staff member that was accused of abuse. This failure has the potential to affect all 73 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings Include: The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 2011 documents This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, neglect or abuse of our residents. The Abuse Prevention Program defines abuse as any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, punishment with resulting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 2011 documents This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, neglect or abuse of our residents. The Abuse Prevention Program defines abuse as any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. This also includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a clinical indication for use of an indwelling catheter for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for catheters. Findings Include: The Facility's Indwelling Catheter Insertion policy dated 03/00 documents Indications should be evaluated before insertion of an indwelling catheter and reevaluated quarterly. These indications are: the resident is in a coma or has terminal illness; a stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer in an area affected by the incontinence; untreatable urethral blockage; the need for exact measurement of urine output; a history of being unable to void after having a catheter removed in the past or a resident with a quad or paraplegia who failed a past attempt to remove a catheter. On 11/1/23 at 9:00 AM R1 stated she had a catheter for a while so the girls wouldn't have to change me, but it kept getting infected so now I don't have one. Provider care notes by V10 (Nurse Practitioner) dated 5/30/23, 6/30/23 and 7/4/23 document The patient is requesting a(n) (Indwelling catheter) during today's visit.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
A. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate precautions were utilized to prevent cross contamination, failed to properly don an N95 mask (respirator), failed to fit test employee annually for N95, failed to wear an N95 in the patients room per policy. These failures have the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility. These failures resulted in three deficient practices. Findings include: A. The facility's NOVEL CORONAVIRUS/COVID-19 Infection Prevention and Control including Outbreaks policy, dated 5/30/23, documents 6. Implement Source Control Measures * HCP (Health Care Personnel): Source control options for HCP include: * A NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) approved particulate respirator with N95 filters or higher. 8. Universal PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for HCP * If a resident is suspected or confirmed to have COVID-19, HCP must wear an N95 respirator, eye protection, gown, and gloves. The facility's RESPIRATORY PROTECTION PROGRAM policy, dated 1/10/21 noted Contracted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-14 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a designated infection preventionist. This failure has the potential to affect all 73 residents within the facility. Findings include: The facility's Infection Control Protocol and Antibiotic Stewardship policy's (undated) document the facility must employee a full time infection preventionist that will be responsible for making rounds and observations throughout the facility to monitor that staff and residents are practicing good infection control and accordance with CDC (Center for Disease Control) guidelines, perform education to the staff regarding infection control matters, track facility infections, ensure proper stewardship practices and interventions are implemented, and meet with the Quality Assurance team monthly to identify trends. The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 672 dated 9-11-23 and signed by V9 (MDS/Minimum Data Set Coordinator) documents 73 residents reside within the facility. On 9/11/23, 09/12/23, and 09/13/23 from 8:45 AM through 2:30 PM there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pain was assessed per policy for 3 of 3 residents (R20, R30, R61) reviewed for pain. Findings include: The facility's Pain Management Protocol, no date, documented All residents are monitored for pain upon admission and on every shift. The following residents lacked a pain assessment every shift (3 shifts, nights, days, evenings): According to R20's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated September 2023, documents Ibuprofen (pain medication) 400 mg (milligram) was administered twice daily, Tramadol 50 mg was administered three times daily and Acetaminophen 650 mg every 4 hours as needed for pain was ordered as needed. The pain assessment summary lacked documentation pain assessments were conducted between 9/1/23 through 9/13/23 on 8 days. According to R30's MAR dated September 2023, documents Tramadol 50 mg was administered daily at night and Acetaminophen 650 mg every 6 hours as needed for pain was ordered. The pain assessment summary lacked documentation pain assessments were conducted between 9/1/23 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated in a dignified manner for one of one resident (R51) reviewed for dignity in a sample of 36. Findings include: A Residents' Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities booklet dated 11/2018 states, Your facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life. On 9/11/23 at 9:50a.m. R51 was seated in a wheelchair in his room. R51's pants were soaked with urine on R51's entire lap area, and from the top of the back of R51's pants all the way down to R51's ankles. R51's call light was turned on and R51 stated he was waiting for staff to assist him with incontinence care. At 10:00a.m. V13 (Activities Aide) and V14 (Certified Nurse Aide/CNA) walked down the hall to R51's room. V13 entered R51's room and asked what he needed. R51 said, I'm wet and V13 stated, I see that. Without explaining what she planned to do for R51, V13 turned around and stepped out of R51's room, spoke to V14 for a few moments then walked down the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the residents needs with a TV (television) for 1 of 36 residents (R30) reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 36. Findings include: R30's record noted a diagnosis of COVID-19 on 9/8/23 and a physician's order for Droplet Isolation . All cares, treatment, meals and activities must occur in patient room. was initiated on 9/8/23 through 9/15/23. On 9/11/23 at 8:15 AM R30's room was observed to have the door shut and a Droplet Isolation sign posted on the door. On 9/11/23 at 12:35 PM, R30 stated he had not had a working TV since he had been in isolation (9/8/23) and had asked many staff members to fix it. On 9/13/23 at 9:20 AM, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she had no idea the TV was not working in R30's room. On 9/13/23 at 11:30, V16 was observed in R30's room trying to turn TV on. V16 stated R30 doesn't have a remote. V16 stated I'm trying to get it working. On 9/14/23 at 1:00 PM, R30 was observed to have the TV on although he stated he still had no remote control. On 9/14/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a physician was notified when a resident developed a full body rash for one of one resident (R52) reviewed for notification of changes in a sample of 36. Findings include: A Change in Condition policy (undated) states, The Facility shall promptly notify the resident, his/her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status. In addition, this policy instructs for the nurse to notify the resident's attending physician or on-call physician when there has been, d. A need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly. On 9/11/23 at 9:43a.m. R52 was laying in bed scratching his chest and wriggling his body to scratch his back against the bed. R52 stated that he had been having an itchy rash off and on for the past two months which was driving him crazy. R52 proceeded to lift his shirt and stated See? R52's entire chest and back were covered with red, scabbed bumps. R52 stated his arms and legs were covered with these bumps too. R52 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a care plan with interventions was developed to address a residents' limitation in range of motion for one of 36 residents (R11) reviewed for care plans in a sample of 36. Findings include: A Care Plan Policy dated 6/1/23 states, Residents receive care and treatment based on an assessment of their needs, the severity of their disease, condition, impairment or disability. The data obtained from the assessment is used to determine and prioritize the patient's plan of care. R11's list of current diagnoses includes Scoliosis. R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents R11 requires extensive assistance from one or two people for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene; has total dependence on one person for locomotion on and off the unit; has a functional limitation in range of motion to both lower extremities, does not walk, and uses a wheelchair for mobility. R11's current care plan documents R11 needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly clean a resident during incontinence care and failed to perform hand hygiene between incontinence care tasks for one of one resident (R51) reviewed for incontinence care in a sample of 36. Findings include: A Perineal Care policy dated 03/2000 gives as its purpose to provide perineal care to promote cleanliness, prevent infection, and to remove irritating and odorous secretions from the perineal area. A Bladder and Bowel Incontinence policy dated 04/2000 states, Wash hands before and after providing incontinent care, and Wash hands and skin exposed to urine or feces as soon as practical. A Standard Precautions policy dated 04/2000 states, Wash hands between tasks and procedures on the same resident when contaminated with body fluids to prevent cross-contamination of different body sites. R51's current care plan documents R51 requires moderate to extensive assistance with personal hygiene and extensive assistance with toilet use. In addition, this care plan instructs staff to wash, rinse and dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limitations in range of motion received range of motion services which affected one of eight residents (R11) reviewed for range of motion in a sample of 36. Findings include: A Range of Motion Exercises policy dated 3/2000 states, Range of Motion exercises are passive or active movements performed to maintain flexibility and useful motion in the joints of the body. R11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documents R11 requires extensive assistance from one or two people for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene; has total dependence of one person for locomotion on and off the unit; has a functional limitation in range of motion to both lower extremities, does not walk, and uses a wheelchair for mobility. R11's Contracture Potential assessment dated [DATE] documents R11 is at moderate risk for developing joint contractures. On 9/11/23 at 2:08p.m. R11 was resting in bed with his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a floor mat was in place as ordered for 1 of 2 resident (R61) reviewed for falls in a sample of 36. Findings include: On 9/11/23 at 2:30 PM, 9/12/23 at 9:07 AM, 9/13/23 at 11:00 AM and 9/14/23 at 1:00 PM, R61 was observed in bed without a floor mat in place. R61's physician order dated 8/21/23 documents low bed when in bed with floor mat next to bed every shift for falls. R61's Careplan documents R61 is at risk for falls with an intervention dated 8/21/23 for bed in lowest position with floor mat. On 9/13/23 at 2:30 PM, V16 (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated I've seen it (floor mat) in there (R61's room). I think the CNA's (Certified Nurse Aide) don't know how to use it (floor mat) all the time.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a urinary indwelling catheter bag was placed in a dignity bag for one (R49) of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheters in a sample of 36. Findings include: On 9-11-23 at 10:25 AM, R49 was sitting in his high back wheelchair in the TV (television) room with his indwelling urinary catheter bag hanging at the bottom of the chair. R49's urinary bag was not in a dignity bag. On 9-14-23 at 9:35 AM, R49 was again sitting in his high back wheelchair in the TV room with his indwelling urinary catheter bag hanging at the bottom of the chair. R49's urinary bag was not in a dignity bag. On 9-14-23 at 9:40 AM V30/Certified Nursing Assistant stated, I didn't realize R49's urinary catheter bag was not in a dignity bag. Most of our (urinary) catheter bags are bags with the dignity cover on them. I will change it right now. On 9-14-23 at 9:45 AM, V2/Director of Nursing stated, yes all urinary catheter bags should be in dignity bags. I thought all our urinary catheter bags had the dignity bag built on them. I will have to make…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with tube feedings and water as ordered by the physician for one (R10) of five residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration in a sample of 36. Findings include: A Nutrition Policy dated 03/2000 stated, A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition. This policy also states, Each resident is provided with sufficient fluid to maintain proper hydration and health. Proper treatment and care for enteral fluids is provided. R10's list of current diagnoses includes Multiple Sclerosis. R10's physician's orders (POS) dated 8/2/23 document R10 cannot take any medications or nutrition orally and is to receive Osmolite 1.5 tube feeding at a rate of 70cc (cubic centimeters) per hour for 22 hours per day and 100cc of free fluid (water) four times per day through R10's gastrostomy tube. R10's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 9/2023 documents that R10 is scheduled to have her tube feeding of Osmolite…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to document resident behaviors to warrant the use of antipsychotic medications and failed to document targeted behaviors for the use of antipsychotic medications for two (R33 and R45) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 36. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication policy (undated) states (The Facility) follows state and federal regulations related to the use of psychotropic medication in the long term care facility to ensure the absolute best care for the resident; Psychotropic medications include: anti-anxiety, hypnotic, antipsychotic and antidepressant classes of drugs; Actions Required: Documents rationale and diagnosis of use and identified target symptoms and behaviors; Monitor for the presence of behaviors on a daily basis. The facility's Behavior Monitoring policy dated 5/17/21, states (V32/Social Rehabilitation Worker) will keep monthly behavior tracking records of resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer scheduled nebulizer treatments for one resident (R2) of three residents reviewed for respiratory treatments. Findings include: Facility Policy/Nebulizer Therapy dated 3/2000 documents: Aerosol medications will be administered to restore and maintain normal function of (mucus movement), improve efficiency of cough mechanism, and to administer medications topically to the airways (i.e., antibiotics, bronchodilators, and vasoconstrictors). Documentation: In the treatment record, record date and time of therapy. Facility Policy/Medication Pass Guidelines dated 3/2000documents: Purpose: To assure the most complete and accurate implementation of physicians' medication orders and to optimize drug therapy for each resident by providing for administration of drugs in an accurate, safe, timely, sanitary manner. Medications are in accordance with written orders of the attending physician. R2's August 2023 Physician Order Sheet (POS) documents R2 has diagnoses which include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow care plan instructions to use only disposable incontinence pads for one (R1) of five residents reviewed for nursing care in the total sample of five. Findings include: The facility's Resident Rights Policy brochure (undated) documents: You have the right to safety and good care; Your facility must provide services to keep your physical and mental health, and sense of satisfaction. R1's diagnoses includes: Cerebrovascular Accident/CVA affecting right side; right sided hemiparesis, right below knee amputation, diabetes, aphasia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease/COPD, history of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus/MRSA, right below knee amputation/BKA. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents R1's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) was not scored/unable to be scored. (MDS indicates that on a scale of 0 - 15, 13 to 15 cognitively intact; 8 to 12 moderate impairment; and 0 to 7 severe impairment.) R1's Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-15 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep dietary worker certifications up to date. This failure has the potential to affect all 68 residents who consume food in the facility except R15 who NPO is (Nothing by Mouth). Findings include: The facility's Dietary Aide job description, undated, states, Position Qualifications and Continuing Requirements: Possess current State and/or local (as appropriate) sanitation certification or State Food Handler Certification. The local state agency website https://dph.illinois.gov/topics-services/food-safety/food-handler-training.html states, Food employee or food handler means an individual working with unpackaged food, food equipment or utensils, or food-contact surfaces. This same website states, Food Handler Training: Food Handler Training is still required for ALL paid employees who meets the definition of a food handler in both restaurants and non-restaurants within 30 days of hire, unless that food handler has a valid Certified Food Protection Manager (CFPM) certification. The ANSI (American National…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's representative of significant changes in weight (R30, R33, R44, R68) and accidents causing changes in skin integrity (R44) for four of four residents reviewed for changes in condition in the sample of 26. Findings include: The facility's Weight Policy, revised 10/17, states, The physician and responsible party will be notified when there is a significant weight loss. A significant weight loss is classified as follows: 1. If being weighed weekly, a 2% (two percent) in one week. 2. 5% (five percent) or more in one month. 3. 7.5% or more in three months. 4. 10% (ten percent) or more in six months. If a resident's weight gain is significant, the physician or responsible party will be notified. The facility's Change of Condition Policy and Procedure, undated, states, The facility shall promptly notify the resident, his/her attending physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for one resident (R53) in the sample of five residents reviewed for medication administration. This failure resulted in two medication errors out of 35 opportunities for error, for a 5.71% error rate. Findings include: The facility's policy Medication Pass Guidelines, effective date 3/2000, documents Purpose: To assure the most complete and accurate implementation of physicians' medication orders and to optimize drug therapy for each resident by providing for administration of drugs in an accurate, safe, timely, and sanitary manner .Procedure: 2. Verify the medication label against the medication sheet for accuracy of drug frequency, duration, strength, and route. a. The nurse is responsible to read and follow precautionary or instructions on prescription labels .4. Follow safe preparation practices .e. Check the Do Not Crush list before crushing medications. Direct specific questions to the pharmacist. If necessary, contact the ordering physician for a change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$185,971 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $32,610 — penalty dated 2025-12-22
- $95,836 — penalty dated 2025-05-31
- $37,349 — penalty dated 2025-04-01
- $20,176 — penalty dated 2025-02-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-01-22 for 14 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-07 for 26 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARON, STANTON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 19% | since 08/18/1987 |
| DUROS, RICHARD | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 01/01/2002 |
| SHLOFROCK, ELISA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 25% | since 08/11/1997 |
| WEINTRAUB, GARY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | 13% | since 08/18/1987 |
| SHLOFROCK, JOHN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/11/1997 |
| MEIXSELL, KELLY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2024 |
| MUSAITIF, ZIAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2015 |
| PEORIA FOREST, L.L.C | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/1987 |
| REDWOOD MANAGEMENT, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/1992 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $274K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146098. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.