Sharon Health Care Pines
3614 North Rochelle, Peoria, IL 61604 · For profit - Corporation · 116 certified beds · (309) 688-0350 Medicaid only — no Medicare
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $235,100 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-24)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 100.0% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.1% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.1% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.2% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.9% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 67.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.36 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.46 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 116 beds and averages 107.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.77 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.95 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate and implement safety interventions for a resident who was on a restricted pass due to impaired thought process and poor safety awareness to prevent an elopement, failed to ensure staff were educated on identifying residents with restricted passes to leave the facility, failed to assess a resident after elopement, and failed to educate staff or implement additional safety interventions once a resident eloped for three (R37, R72, and R75) of four residents reviewed for elopement. These failures resulted in R75, who the facility identified as not being capable of unsupervised outside pass privileges due to poor safety awareness, impaired thought process, and psychiatric diagnoses (including Schizophrenia), from exiting the facility without staff knowledge or supervision on 8/24/25 when R75 left the grounds in a Taxi. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 8-24-25 when R75 left the Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespreadProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident (R1) from mental and verbal abuse and failed to protect residents from further potential abuse. This failure resulted in residents experiencing emotional distress and persistent fear of V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant). This failure has the potential to affect all 102 residents who reside in the facility. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 3/19/25 at approximately 5:00 pm, when V3 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) responded inappropriately to R1. V3 taunted R1 by sticking her tongue out at R1; calling R1's significant other ugly; and asking if R1 was going to fight V3. R1 experienced emotional distress and fear of V3. V3's termination was rescinded and V3 returned to work in the facility, leaving residents fearful. While the immediacy was removed on 4/24/25, the facility remains out of compliance at Severity Level II as additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of their removal plan and Quality Assurance monitoring. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a vulnerable resident (R1) who is known to become agitated with loud noises and too much stimulation, from being a victim of resident-to-resident abuse on 4/7/2024 and 4/11/2024 and failed to maintain the intervention of 15-minute monitoring for (R1). These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy starting 4/7/2024. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 5/2/2024, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity level two. Additional time is needed to monitor the effectiveness of the implementation of protocols and oversight visits Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy, reviewed 11/10/2023, documents, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect, or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent abuse of five (R2, R4, R5, R6, R7) of 7 residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R1 picking up a chair and hitting R2 in the head causing R2 to go unconscious, sustaining a bleeding laceration to upper lip requiring sutures and sustaining a laceration to left side of head requiring three staples. Findings include:The facility policy, Abuse Prevention Program Facility Procedure, reviewed 9/1/25, documents not in its entirety, This facility desires to prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment and misappropriation of resident property by establishing a resident sensitive and resident secure environment.1. Facility incident report dated 5/24/26 documents that R1 and R2 got into a physical altercation after R2 became agitated at R1 over table seating in the dining room. R1 asked R2 to go to another table causing R2 to strike out at R1 and R1 picking up a chair and hitting R2 in the head causing R2 to go unconscious and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse for two of four (R1 and R3) residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of four. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a complex fracture of the left hip requiring surgical intervention. Findings include:The facility's Abuse Prevention Program, reviewed 7/21/25, documents that abuse means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. This form also documents that willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. Physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means and that requires medical attention.R1's electronic medical record documents the following diagnoses: Schizophrenia, Major Depression, Dementia, EPS, HTN,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident-to-resident physical and sexual abuse and failed to implement abuse risk assessment and care plans for four of four residents (R1-R4) reviewed for abuse in a sample of four. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a left femoral neck fracture, requiring surgical intervention. Findings include: The Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy, revised 12/18/24, documents that the facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This form also documents that abuse means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of a mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. This form documents that physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means and that requires medical attention. Physical abuse includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R2) was free from physical abuse by another resident (R1) for two of four residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of four. This failure resulted in R2 receiving sutures at the hospital for a facial laceration. Findings include: The facility's undated Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy documents Policy: This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. the purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, neglect or abuse of our residents. This policy continues to state, This facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to facility staff, other residents,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (R1 and R6) of four residents were free from abuse in a sample of eight. These failures resulted in R1 and R6 both going to the hospital after R1 was struck in the head, and R6 getting a bloody nose. Findings include: Facility Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy, reviewed 9/26/23, documents This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse. Abuse means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident. Abuse is the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Physical Abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means and requires medical attention. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. 1. Facility reported incident, dated 10/7/23 documents R1 and R2 got in a verbal altercation, yelling at one another, R2 swung at R1, and both began pulling each other's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R2), for one of three residents (R1), reviewed for abuse, in a sample of five. Due to the physical abuse R1 experienced an abrasion to R (right) hand knuckles, skin tear to bridge of nose and laceration to L (Left) cheek. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The facility policy, Abuse Prevention and Reporting, dated (reviewed 7/11/23) directs staff, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. Physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means and that requires medical attention. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. R1's Nursing Progress Notes, dated 8/1/2023 at 6:30 P.M. document, (R1) got in a physical altercation with peer (R2) at the smoking patio. Abrasion to R (right) hand knuckles, skin tear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-22 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician ordered Dilantin level for one of two residents (R47) reviewed for hospitalizations in the sample of 30. This failure resulted in R47 being hospitalized with a critically high Dilantin level. Findings include: On 06/20/23 at 10:41 AM, R47 was alert self-propelling himself in the hallway. R47 stated, A few weeks ago, I had to go to the hospital because they messed something up with my medicine. R47's Care plan, dated 6/21/23, documents, (R47) has a seizure disorder. (R47) has a (vagal nerve) Interventions: Give seizure medication as ordered by doctor. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. Obtain and monitor lab/diagnostic work as ordered. Report results to physician and follow up as indicated. R47's Nurses' notes, dated 4/15/23 at 10:23 a.m., document, This nurse was notified that (R47) was out on the patio having a seizure. (R47) was having a seizure for 4 minutes. No falls or no injuries. (R47) stayed in a catatonic state for 15 minutes. Doctor was notified and his orders are as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report a resident-to-resident abuse allegation to the state agency for one (R1) of seven residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:Facility policy, Abuse Prevention Program Facility Procedures, reviewed 9/1/25, documents not in its entirety, Initial Reporting of Allegations. When an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property has occurred, the resident's representative and the Department of Public Health's regional office shall be informed by telephone or fax. Public Health shall be informed that an occurrence of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property has been reported and is being investigated. The report shall include the following information, if known at the time of the report: Name, age, diagnosis and mental status of the resident allegedly abused, neglected, exploited, mistreated, or from whom property was misappropriated, type of abuse reported (physical, sexual, neglect, verbal or mental abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent abuse for one (R2) of three residents reviewed for abuse in a total sample of ten.The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Policy revised 12/18/24 documents that the facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse.R2's medical record documents R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alcohol Abuse, Diabetes, Anxiety Disorder, and Psychoactive Substance Abuse.R2's Nursing Progress Note dated 1/18/26 at 12:21 PM documents Resident in a physical altercation with peer, resident separated by staff, no injuries noted.R2's Brief Interview for Mental Status dated 3/10/26 documents a score of 14, indicating R2 has little or no or little cognitive impairment. R3's medical record documents R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Ischemic Heart Disease, Mood Disorder with Manic Features, and Encephalopathy.R3's Nursing Progress Note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there are sufficient number of licensed nursing staff to provide care and supervision for dependent residents. This has the potential to affect all 110 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Staffing Policy, dated 4/30/25, documents, It is the policy of the facility that minimum numbers of nursing staff members within the facility be established and maintained. Staffing levels may vary by shift and by the day of the week and should be based on census, and level of care needed/medical acuity of the in-house resident population.The facility Staffing Requirements calculators, dated 8/5/25, 8/12/25, 8/16/25, 8/17/25, 8/23/25, 8/24/25, documents the number of licensed nursing staff required for day shift (7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.) was four nurses/32 licensed nursing hours, for evening shift (3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.) three nurses/24 licensed nursing hours, and for night shift (11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) two nurses/16 licensed nursing hours.On 8/28/25 at 8:30 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse was working eight consecutive hours in a twenty four hour period. This has the potential to affect all 110 residents residing in the facility. On 8/28/25 at 8:30 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) provided all nurse timecard reports for 8/5/25 through 8/24/25. The timecard reports have no documentation of a registered nurse working eight consecutive hours on 8/12/25. On 08/28/2025 at 10:15 AM, V2 confirmed there was not a Registered Nurse working on 8/12/25.The facility's Center's for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long Term Care Application, dated 8/25/25 and signed by V1 (Administrator), documents there are 110 residents residing in the facility.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label, and date opened food items in the kitchen's refrigerator and freezer and discard expired food, ensure kitchen ceiling tiles/vents were kept clean, and ensure kitchen freezer was maintaining proper temperature. This failure has the potential to affect all 110 residents. Findings include:The facility's Labeling and Dating and Food Policy, dated 4/25/25, documents Purpose: To prevent foodborne illness and ensure safe storage, handling, and consumption of all foods served to resident by clearly labeling and dating all food items upon receipt, preparation, or opening, in accordance will Illinois state regulations and facility policies. This policy applies to: All dietary services staff, caregivers, and any staff handling food. All food items stored in the main kitchen, refrigerators, freezers, pantries, meal prep areas, and resident rooms (as applicable). Definitions: Label: A written or printed tag or marker attached to or placed on a food item that identifies the item, date opened, and any other required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained an effective pest control program. This has the potential to affect all 110 residents. Findings include:The facility's Pest Control Policy, dated 4/25/25, documents Purpose: Ensure a safe, healthy, and comfortable living, environment for residents, staff, visitors, and guests by managed and preventing pest infestations. 2. Scope: Applies to all buildings and grounds owned, leased, or operated by the facility, including resident rooms, common areas, kitchens, dining areas, laundry, maintenance spaces, and storage areas. Covers all staff, contractors, vendors, volunteers, residents, and visitors. 3. Definitions: Pest: Any unwanted animal (insects, rodents, birds, etcetera) or related hazard affecting health, sanitation, and comfort. Integrated Pest Management: A holistic approach combining prevention, monitoring, sanitation, exclusion, mechanical and cultural controls, and limited, targeted use of pesticides as a last resort. 5. Policy Statements: Prevention and Sanitation: Maintain high standards…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-03 · tag F0944 — widespreadConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure all staff received annual QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) in-service training. This failure has the potential to affect all 110 residents residing within the facility. Findings include:The facility's Center's for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long Term Care Application dated 8/25/25 and signed by V1 (Administrator), documents there are 110 residents residing in the facility. The facility's List of Staff In-services, dated 8/8/24 through 8/25/25, do not include documentation of facility staff receiving annual QAPI training.On 8/28/25 at 12:55 PM V21/Administrative Assistant verified no staff at the facility has received the annual QAPI training.
- Potential for harm · E2025-09-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document medications at the time of administration for nine of nine residents (R3, R4, R6, R8, R13, R15, R18, R61 and R89), reviewed for medication administration, in a sample of 40. FINDINGS INCLUDE: The (undated) facility policy, Medication Administration directs staff, Documentation: Initial Medication Administration Record immediately after administering medications. No pre-signing or post-signing. A review of R4's current Medication Administration Record, dated August 2025 includes the following medications Aspirin 81 MG (milligrams), Escitalopram 15 MG, Fenofibrate 200 MG, Fluticasone Inhalation Aerosol, Incuse Ellipta Inhalation Aerosol 62.5 Mcg/ACT, Loratadine 10 MG, Omeprazole 20 MG, Oxybutynin Extended Release 10 MG, Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation 108 MCG/ACT 2, Eliquis 5 MG, Hydroxyzine 25 MG, Lasix 40 MG, Metformin 1000 MG, Risperidone 1 MG, Divalproex Delayed Release Sprinkle 125 MG and Pregabalin Oral Capsule 100 MG, not documented as administered 10+ times from August 1- August 25, 2025. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide physician ordered treatments to one of one resident (R108) reviewed for skin conditions in the sample of 40. Findings include: On 8/25/25 at 10:41 AM, R108 had multiple round, red, raised, and flaky areas scattered throughout his bilateral upper and lower extremities. R108 stated the areas are psoriasis and eczema. R108 also stated the areas have gotten worse recently. R108's care plan, dated 8/14/25, documents R108 has psoriasis on his body and interventions to apply Nystatin powder to abdominal folds as ordered and triamcinolone as ordered. R108's physician's order, dated 8/26/25, documents R108 has the following orders: triamcinolone acetonide external cream 0.1 % apply to R108's affected area topically two times a day every Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday for diagnosis of psoriasis ordered 8/22/25; antifungal powder apply to R108's abdominal fold topically three times a day for excoriation ordered 7/5/23. R108's MAR (Medication Administration Record), dated August 2025 documents as of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to give medications as ordered by the physician to three residents (R4, R8 and R18) of eleven residents reviewed for medication pass. This failure resulted in three errors out of twenty-five opportunities for a 12% medication error rate.FINDINGS INCLUDE:The (undated) facility policy, Medication Administration directs staff, Follow the seven rights- right patient, right medication, right dose, right time, right route, right documentation and right to be informed. Medication Preparation: Follow special directions: Shake Well, Do Not Crush, etc. Medication Errors: Manufacturer specifications/Professional Standards: Failure to Shake Well. Inhalers should be given with 1 minute between puffs of the same med and 5 minutes between puffs of different medications. Metered dose inhalers should be shaken well, and resident instructed on correct technique. 1. R4's current Physician Order Sheet, dated [DATE] includes the following medication: Albuterol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to date an opened bottle of insulin for two of two residents (R8 and R101) reviewed for insulin administration, in a sample of 40.FINDINGS INCLUDE:R8's current Physician Order Sheet, dated August 2025 includes the following medications: Insulin Lispro 100 Unit/ML (Milliliter) Inject as per sliding scale.On 8/25/2025 8:51 A.M., V4/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepared to administer insulin for R8. V4/LPN withdrew 18 units of insulin from an opened, undated insulin bottle and administered it to R8 in her abdomen. At that time, V4/LPN verified the opened, undated insulin and stated she didn't know what date the insulin bottle was first accessed.R101's current Physician Order Sheet, dated August 2025 includes the following medications: Insulin Lispro 100 Unit/ML inject as per sliding scale.On 8/25/2025 8:51 A.M., V5/Registered Nurse (RN) prepared to administer insulin for R101. V5/RN withdrew 2 units of insulin from an opened, undated insulin bottle and administered it to R101 in the left arm. At that time, V5/RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record by documenting physician- ordered blood glucose testing for one of four residents (R101), reviewed for blood glucose monitoring, in a sample of 40.FINDINGS INCLUDE:R101's current Physician Order Sheet, dated August 2025 includes the following medications: Insulin Lispro 100 Unit/ML inject as per sliding scale, from blood glucose monitoring before each meal for Diabetes Mellitus.On 8/25/25 a review of R101's current Medication Administration Record, dated August 1- August 25, 2025, documents facility staff failed to document R101's fingerstick blood glucose result on August 6, 8, 10, 15, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24, 2025.On 8/27/2025 at 8:40 A.M., V2/Director of Nurses confirmed R101's current physician order for fingerstick blood glucose monitoring twice daily. At that time, V2 stated staff were to perform the testing and record the results in R101's medical record, for R101's physician to monitor R101's blood sugar levels.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review facility staff failed to disinfect a shared blood glucose monitoring machine after use for two of two residents (R8 and R103) reviewed for blood glucose monitoring, in a sample of 40. FINDINGS INCLUDE:The facility policy, Glucometer Cleaning Policy and Procedure, dated 6/5/25 directs staff, This procedure should be done as needed, but is expected to be performed after each use of the equipment. Open (disinfectant) packet, removed pre-moistened towelette, wipe desired surface to be disinfected, allow a 5-minute dry time.R8's current Physician Order Sheet, dated August 2025 includes the following physician's orders: Blood Glucose Monitoring three times daily.R103's current Physician Order Sheet, dated August 2025 includes the following physician's orders: Blood Glucose Monitoring three times daily.On 8/25/2025 at 11:52 A.M., V4\/Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) performed a blood glucose finger stick on R8. After V4/LPN completed the finger stick blood glucose testing, V4 cleansed the glucometer with an alcohol pad and immediately placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident from physical abuse for one of four residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 11. Findings include: The Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy, revised 12/18/24, documents that the facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This form also documents that abuse means any physical or mental injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of a mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Physical abuse includes hitting, slapping, pinching, kicking, and controlling behaviors through corporal punishment. R2's Progress Notes, dated 8/6/25, documents that R2 was involved in a physical altercation with a peer. Peer (R10) pushed resident (R2). (R2) fell to the floor, landing on his left side. R2's Brief Interview for Mental Status, dated 6/3/25 documents a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report resident-to-resident physical abuse to the State Agency for one (R2) of four residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 11. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy, dated 8/12/25, documents that employees are required to report any incident allegation or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator immediately, or to an immediate supervisor who must then immediately report it to the administrator. In the absence of the administrator, reporting can be made to an individual who has been designated to act as administrator in the administrator's absence. This form also documents that when an allegation of abuse, exploitation, neglect, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property has occurred, the resident's representative and the Department of Public Health's regional office shall be informed by telephone or fax. R2's Progress Notes, dated 8/6/25, documents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate resident-to-resident physical abuse for one of four residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 11. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy, dated 8/12/25, documents that upon learning of the report of an allegation of abuse, the administrator or designee shall initiate an incident investigation. R2's Progress Notes, dated 8/6/25, documents that R2 was involved in a physical altercation with a peer. Peer (R10) pushed resident (R2). (R2) fell to the floor, landing on his left side. R10's Progress Notes, dated 8/6/25, documents that R10 was involved in a physical altercation with a peer (R2). (R10) pushed (R2), causing him to fall and land on his left side. On 8/22/25 at 10:30am, V1, Administrator, verified that he was not notified of this incident, so no investigation or reporting was done. V1 stated that any allegation or incident to supposed to be reported to him or V9 as soon as it happens. V1 also stated that an investigation is initiated immediately, even on weekends…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify local law enforcement of a resident-to-resident physical altercation resulting in an injury, for one of two residents (R1) reviewed for reporting abuse in a sample of four. The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Facility Procedures, reviewed 7/21/25, documents that the facility shall contact local law enforcement authorities (i.e., non-emergency police number or 911) in the following situations: Physical abuse involving physical injury inflicted on a resident by another resident, except in situations where the behavior is associated with dementia or developmental disability.R1's Progress Notes, dated 7/22/25, document that resident (R1) was involved in an altercation with a peer (R2) while outside on the smoking patio. (R1) was lying on the patio, stating his hip hurt. (R1) was lying on his left side near his wheelchair on the pavement of the smoking patio. (R1) stated that his right hip hurt; however, he was lying on his left side. (R1) stated that he was unable to stand up due to the pain. Orders were received to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate an incident when residents were exposed to a toxic chemical and failed to follow their policy regarding Safety/Supervision related to Incidents/Accidents. The facility failed to perform and document an individual assessment after a resident was known to have been exposed to a toxic chemical for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for quality of care and treatment in the sample of three. Findings include: The facility's undated Incidents/Accidents Policy and Procedure documents an accident is an unexpected, unintended event that can cause a resident bodily injury. An Incident is any occurrence that could result in physical harm or great emotional upset to a resident. Each incident or accident must be detailed in the medical record of the involved resident. This includes drug reactions or any happening or experience which may be traumatic or inflict bodily injury to a resident. This policy further documents a nurse will assess the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from physical abuse for one (R6) of seven residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of seven. Findings Include: The Facility's undated Abuse Policy documents, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation as defined below, this includes, but is not limited to, freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and any physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. The purpose of this proclaims is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of our residents. This facility is committed to protection out residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to, facility staff, other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-03 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to respond to repeated resident council concerns. This has the potential to affect all 96 residents who reside in the facility. Findings Include: The Facility's admission Packet contained information on Resident Council that documented At least once a month, the residents of this facility participate in Resident Council meetings to discuss the diverse matters of nursing home life. The officers of the resident council communicate any matters of concern to the facility's management. The staff at our facility and the Resident Council will work cooperatively to effectively address resident concerns and advice. Participation in the Resident Council is not mandatory, and any issues raised by the residents, whether at the Resident Council meeting or otherwise will be addressed. The Facility's undated Procedure for Resident Grievances or Complaints policy documents, Residents, guardians, responsible parties and/or legal representatives are encouraged to make known their problems or complaints. Open discussion or written communication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions throughout the facility to protect vulnerable residents and prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). This failure has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's (undated) Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) policy documents It is the policy to implement enhanced barrier precautions for the prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organism (MDROs). Enhanced barrier precautions are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes. EBPs involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk for MDRO acquisition (residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). High-contact resident activities include: dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to prevent and monitor residents for Physical Abuse and Verbal Abuse for four (R1, R23, R59, and R66) of 32 Residents reviewed for Abuse in a sample of 34. Findings include: Facility Abuse Prevention Program Policy, reviewed 11/10/23, documents: the Facility affirms the right of our Residents to be free from Abuse; has attempted to establish a Resident sensitive and Resident secure environment; the purpose of the policy is to assure that the Facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent occurrences of Abuse; the Facility is committed to protecting our Residents from Abuse by anyone including, but not limited to, Facility Staff and other Residents; the following definitions are based on Federal and State laws, regulations and interpretive guidelines; Abuse is a willful infliction of injury; any instance of Abuse of Residents irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause harm, pain or mental anguish; including verbal abuse and physical abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to treat one resident (R91) with dignity and respect of 24 residents reviewed for dignity and respect in a total sample of 34. Findings Include: The Facility's undated Resident Dignity policy documents (This Facility) promotes care for residents in a manner and in an environment that maintains or enhances each resident's dignity and respect in full recognition of his or individuality. Dignity means that in their interactions with residents, staff carry out activities which assist the resident to maintain and enhance his/her self esteem and self worth. For example: promoting residents independence and dignity in the dining room, respecting resident's social status, speaking respectfully, listening carefully, treating residents with respect and focusing on residents as individuals when they talk to them and addressing residents as individuals when providing care and services. A person's dignity is vitally important to each individual's mental and emotional wellbeing. When your dignity is violated, you begin to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to assist one resident (R93) to find an alternate nursing home placement of 20 residents reviewed for discharge planning in a total sample of 34. Findings Include: The Facility's admission Packet includes the following Discharge Planning information The Social Service Department is the department dedicated within the facility to assist with discharge planning. The resident or family should contact Social Service as soon as the option of leaving the facility is being considered. It is the philosophy of this facility to help residents make transition to alternative living arrangements as smooth as possible. To achieve this, the Social Service Department works to maintain current information about services available to assist with independent living and other communal settings, which may be less restrictive, than an intermediate or skilled nursing facility discharge planning assistance has no additional charge. On 9/17/24 at 9:30 AM R93 stated I hate it here; I want to go back to (A different long term care facility). I have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review/PASARR including an initial Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act/OBRA were revised for 2 of 2 residents (R8, R67) who were diagnosed with a psychiatric condition after admission in the sample of 34. Findings include: 1) R8's Interagency Certification of Screening Results document R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R8's OBRA-1 Initial Screen does not document a psychiatric diagnosis. R8's electronic medical record documents a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type on 12/12/2018. On 09/19/24 at 11:03 AM V4/Quality Assurance stated she cannot provide an updated screening of a Level I PASARR to determine the need for a Level II PASARR after R8 was diagnosed with a psychiatric condition. 2) R67's Interagency Certification of Screening Results document R67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R67's OBRA-1 Initial Screen does not document a psychiatric diagnosis. R67's electronic medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to update one resident's chart (R99) for a code status change from Full Code to Modified DNR (Do Not Resuscitate). This failure resulted in R99 receiving full CPR including chest compressions after being found unresponsive. Findings Include: R99's POLST (Physician Order Life Sustaining Treatment) dated [DATE] documents Modified DNAR (Do Not Attempt Resuscitation) to include: non-invasive airway and breathing, IV (Intravenous medications) and transfer to the hospital. Do Not perform chest compressions. R99's care plan dated [DATE] documents (R99) wishes to be full code. R99's care plan was updated on [DATE] (one day after her death) to (R99) has DNR (Do Not resuscitate) order. R99's Nurse' Notes written by V13 (Licensed Practical Nurse) document that on [DATE] at 3:15 AM At about 2:30 am resident was found unresponsive after several room checks through the night. I retrieved an ambu-bag and used it until EMS (Emergency Medical Services) arrived as she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure therapy services were provided as ordered for 1 of 2 (R96) residents reviewed for limited range of motion in the sample of 34. Findings include: On 09/17/24 at 3:15 PM R96 was observed sitting in a community room watching videos on his phone using his right hand. R96 appeared to have left upper extremity weakness and lack of coordination. R96's Physician Order Sheet dated September 19, 2024; documents he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R96 had an order dated 08/15/24 for a referral to outpatient ST/speech therapy, PT/physical therapy and OT/occupational therapy. On 09/17/24 at 3:15 PM R96 stated he is not receiving therapy. R96 stated, I've been here for 6 weeks, and they are finally getting me a paper for therapy today. My mom and I had to set it up ourselves. On 09/18/24 1:30 PM V11/R96's Power of Attorney stated she has spoken with staff regarding getting R96 screened for physical, occupational and speech therapy and he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow registered dietician recommendations to prevent weight loss for one (R75) of three residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's Weight policy and procedure, dated 1/12/22, documents Within a week after weights have been received and reviewed by the Nursing Department and Dietary Manager, the Weight Committee will meet to discuss and recommend the need for any possible dietary interventions or diet order changes. If the Dietician is present in the facility, the Committee will consult with her. If not, they will simply notify the physician for the possibility of new orders. Order changes will be recorded in the clinical record as well as any needed care plan intervention changes. At any time when the Dietician is in the facility, any recommendations she makes will be referred to the physician for approval. The facility Significant Weight Changes weekly weight meeting form, dated 9/2024, documents R75 weight as 159.2 lbs (pounds) down 5.4 % (percent) in one month…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident of abuse for one (R6) of four residents reviewed for abuse investigations in a sample of eight. Findings include: Facility Abuse Prevention Program Facility Procedures, reviewed 9/26/23, documents All incidents involving a physical altercation, with or without injuries will be investigated. The appointed investigator will attempt to interview the person who reported the incident, anyone likely to have direct knowledge of the incident, and the resident. Any written statements. Facility Preliminary abuse investigation report, dated 9/1/23 at 6:35pm, documents (R6) involved in a physical altercation. Swelling and bleeding on nose and mouth. Facility Final Abuse Investigation Report, dated 9/6/23, documents (R6) was involved in an alleged altercation in resident room with (R7) resulting in (R6) getting a bloody nose. This final investigation report documents a nurse who assessed R6 and R7, V3 social services interviewed R6 and R7, and V1 Administrator interviewed R6 and R7. No other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse for one of one resident (R81) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 30. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy, dated 12/1/22, documents, This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, corporal punishment, and involuntary seclusion. This facility therefore prohibits mistreatment, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. This facility is committed to protecting our residents from abuse by anyone including, but not limited to, facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers, staff from other agencies providing services to the individual, family members or legal guardians, friends, or any other individuals. The policy also documents, Verbal abuse is the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all medication was stored and labeled in accordance with facility policy and procedure, for three of 15 residents (R26, R32, R49) observed for medication pass, in a sample of 30. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Medication Administration Treatment Management Evaluation (no date), documents that the facility utilizes a plastic cassette packaging system that is prepared by the pharmacy and adheres to the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) guidelines. This packaging system includes a label on each cassette that contains the following information: Doctor's name, Resident's name, original date of prescription, prescription number, brand name of medication, room number, direction of medication, facility code, and time of administration. The policy advises, (Medication) Containers with no labels are destroyed by the pharmacist and/or nurse as stated in the Destruction of Medication Protocol. The policy later documents, If a medication is prepared and the resident is not available at the time to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a glucose monitor was disinfected between use for two of four residents (R80, R84) reviewed during the medication pass with blood glucose monitoring, in a sample of 30. Findings include: The facility policy, titled Infection Control - Glucometers Use and Cleaning (no date), documents According to recommendations published by the Centers for Disease Control: 'Glucometers should be assigned to individual patients. If a glucometer that has been used for one patient must be used for another patient, the device must be cleaned and disinfected. The policy further documents, All glucometers shall be disinfected using a chlorine-based wipe prior to and following each use; the glucometer shall be wiped completely with a new, saturated, chlorine cloth and set aside until dry. The drying time for each sanitized glucometer is generally 2 minutes, unless otherwise specified by the manufacturer of the disinfectant. On 6/20/23 at 11:33 am, while observing the Medication Pass, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse) used the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-10-03 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure the (state agency) survey inspection book contained three years of previous survey results for complaint and certification inspections and ensure the survey book was readily accessible to residents and families without asking for assistance to view. This failure has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 9/18/24 at 10:15 AM, during the resident group meeting, residents who have previously attended resident council meetings R44, R53, R65, R70, R78, R79, and R85 all confirmed they did not know where in the facility to access the facility's previous annual and complaint investigation results and did not know that (State Agency) survey results are something accessible for them to review. On 9/18/24 at 11:00 AM, the facility's main hall bulletin board contained a posting that documents (State Agency) survey results are available for inspection in our survey room. Please let us know and we can provide this to you if the survey room is locked. On 9/18/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$235,100 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $80,600 — penalty dated 2025-04-24
- $154,500 — penalty dated 2024-05-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in IL
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 14E322. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.