No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Eden Vista Prospect Heights

700 East Euclid Avenue, Prospect Heights, IL 60070 · For profit - Corporation · 30 certified beds · (847) 797-2700 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (847) 797-2700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
3 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
800 Biermann Ct · (847) 634-7400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
409 E Euclid Ave · (224) 735-2588 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1100 N Boxwood Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.7%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.1%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.7%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.8%20.6%21.2%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.5%2.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine64.4%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.6%13.9%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

31.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 84 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

31.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.32U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.72hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.52hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF31.9%CMS range 23.8–40.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 7.0–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge76.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.2–12.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.261.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

2.00
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.27
RN hoursweekends
26.5%
Total nursing turnover
26.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 23.3 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.03 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.32 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.30 to 1.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-12)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-09)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure ongoing monitoring, assessment to identify worsening of skin impairment and notify the physician for appropriate treatment in a timely manner. This failure resulted in R11's Moisture Associated Skin Disorder (MASD) on left buttocks to progress to sacral/coccyx area stage 3 pressure ulcer with slough formation. This deficiency affects one (R11) of one resident in the sample of 9 reviewed for Wound Care Management. Findings include: On 12/9/25 at 11:36AM, Observed V15 CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) and V16 CNA repositioned R11 to her left side for wound care. Observed open wound on sacrococcygeal area without dressing exposed to disposable adult brief soiled with urine. V16 said that she provided incontinence care to R11 this morning at around 7:00am and her wound dressing fell off. She forgot to inform the V17 RN (Registered Nurse) and V3 Assistant DON (ADON)/Wound Care Coordinator (WCC). V3 said that V16 CNA should notify her or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions according to resident's plan of care in preventing the development of a pressure ulcer for one (R13) of two residents in the sample of 21 reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure resulted in R13's intact skin developing moisture associated skin damage on the left buttock which progressed to a Stage 4 pressure ulcer. Findings include: R13 is an [AGE] year-old female, admitted in the facility on 09/30/22 with diagnoses of Pressure Ulcer of Sacral, Stage 4, Neurocognitive Disorder with Lewy Bodies and Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance and Anxiety. R13's POS (Physician Order Sheet) dated 04/14/23 recorded: Left buttock: Apply skin prep to surrounding skin. Cleanse with normal saline. Pat dry. Hypochlorous Acid Solution 0.05% and cover with gauze island with border dressing once daily one time a day for Stage 4 pressure wound of the left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for fall prevention by not consistently assessing risks for falls, not ensuring fall interventions were implemented, not implementing effective fall interventions for residents experiencing multiple falls, and not providing adequate supervision for high risk fall residents who required increased supervision. This failure applied to two (R122 and R274) of four residents reviewed for falls and resulted in R274 sustaining a left femur fracture. Findings include: R274 is a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted on [DATE] and currently resides in the facility. R274 has multiple diagnoses including but not limited to the following: left femur fracture, respiratory failure, CHF, COPD, need for assistance with personal care, unsteadiness on feet, difficulty in walking, and HTN. Per hospital discharge records dated 1/27/23, R274 was admitted to the skilled nursing side of the facility from assisted living…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely oral care for one of three (R6) dependent residents reviewed for oral care in a sample of nine.Findings Include:On 12/9/2025 at 11:05am R6 was observed in bed with a foul mouth odor.On 12/9/2025 at 11:10am V16 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) said I did oral care for R6 her mouth has an odor.On 12/9/2025 at 11:20am V2(Director of Nursing-DON), said I expect the nursing assistants to perform mouth care daily and as needed. An admission record dated 12/10/2025 indicates that R6 has an diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting left dominant side, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, GERD, and gastrostomy status, a order summary report dated 12/10/2025 that indicates NPO diet for failed speech swallowing dated 7/17/2023, a care plan dated 4/17/2024 with a focus of ADL self-care performance deficit impaired mobility, impaired cognition, hemiplegia left side a interventions for personal hygiene/oral care assist-one with grooming, oral hygiene-oral care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation the facility failed to apply ace wrap bandage to resident's bilateral lower extremities for edema as ordered by physician. The facility also failed to develop plan of care in managing resident's edema. This deficiency affects one (R11) of one resident in the sample of 9 reviewed for Quality of care.Findings include: On 12/9/25 at 11:26AM, Observed R11 with swollen bilateral lower extremities with V17 RN (Registered Nurse). V17 assessed R11's bilateral lower extremities for pitting edema. V17 said that she has bilateral pitting edema but more prominent on left lower leg. R11 is alert and responsive with periods of confusion. She has impaired hearing and slurred speech. On 12/9/25 at 3:05PM, Reviewed R11's medical records with V2 DON (Director of Nursing). R11 is admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis listed in part but not limited to Essential hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation, History of falling, Muscle weakness, Muscle wasting, Unsteadiness on feet and hearing loss. Active Physician order sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician order and implement care plan intervention for resident with limited mobility on left arm. This deficiency affects one (R3) of one resident in the sample of 9 reviewed for Limited mobility. Findings include: On 12/9/25 at 11:15AM, Observed R3 in Broda (Recliner chair) in the activity room leaning to right side off the recliner chair in front of V14 Activity Aide. No hand splint or wheelchair resting hand splint applied. Showed observation to V2 Director of Nursing (DON). V2 repositioned R3 in upright position. R3 is re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis listed in part but not limited to Senile degeneration of brain, Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, Abnormal posture. Active physician orders indicated Apply functional hand splint to left hand, may remove for hygiene, skin checks and as per patient's tolerance. Wheelchair arm through the left side to facilitate proper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall prevention intervention to resident who has history of multiple falls. This deficiency affects one (R11) of one resident in the sample of 9 reviewed for Fall prevention program. Findings include: On 12/9/25 at 11:06AM, Observed R11 sitting in wheelchair in her room. She is alert with impaired hearing and slurred speech. The call light is away from her, unable to reach. Showed observation to V2 DON (Director of Nursing). V2 said that call light should be accessible and placed within resident reach for safety.On 12/9/25 at 3:05PM, Reviewed R11's medical records with V2 DON. R11 is admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis listed in part but not limited to History of falling, displaced Tri malleolar fracture of left lower leg, Closed fracture with routine healing, Subluxation of left ankle joint, Muscle weakness, Muscle wasting, Unsteadiness on feet and hearing loss. Care plan intervention indicated: Assist resident to meet needs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pain was thoroughly assessed and adequately treated for teeth pain for one of three residents (R6) in a sample of nine reviewed for pain.Findings include:On 12/10/2025 at 11:00am R6 was observed in bed with dark areas, a foul odor to mouth and broken teeth with yellow to brown build up. R6 was asked did she have pain to her teeth R6 said pain.On 12/10/2025 at 11:25am V2(Director of Nursing-DON) said I expect all nurses to assess for pain, I did assess R6 for mouth pain and R6 did confirm that she was in pain which I administered acetaminophen 625mg two tabs and called the physician for an assessment for dental ASAP and notified the power of attorney-POA.An admission record dated 12/10/2025 indicates that R6 has an diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting left dominant side, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, GERD, and gastrostomy status, an order summary report dated 12/10/2025 that indicates NPO diet for failed speech swallowing dated 7/17/2023, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided for a dependent resident for one of three residents (R6) reviewed for dental services in a sample of nine.Findings Include:On 12/9/2025 at 11:00am this writer observed R6 teeth very dark, broken in places, and a build up of yellowish film and foul odor.On 12/9/2025 at 11:20am this writer asks V2(Director of Nursing-DON) when was R6 last dental referral or exam.On 12/9/2025 at 11:25am V2 said I was unable to find a dental referral for R6, I did call the physician for a referral as soon as possible, I think because she is private pay, she has not had a dental exam she's been here for several years. An admission record dated 12/10/2025 indicates that R6 has an diagnosis of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting left dominant side, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, GERD, and gastrostomy status, an order summary report dated 12/10/2025 that indicates NPO diet for failed speech swallowing dated 7/17/2023, a care plan dated 4/17/2024 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene after providing incontinence care and before handling clean disposable brief. This deficiency affects one (R11) of three residents in the sample 9 reviewed for Infection Control Program.Findings include: On 12/9/25 at 11:31AM, Observed V15 CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) and V16 CNA repositioned R11 to her left side. Observed R11 soiled with urine. V15 removed the soiled disposable adult brief. She cleansed the perinium and sacral area with disposable cleansing wipes. V15 did not remove and perform hand hygiene. V15 took clean disposable adult brief and placed underneath R11. Informed V15, V16 and V3 ADON (Assistant Director for Nursing) of observation made regarding failure to perform hand hygiene after providing incontinence care and before handling clean adult brief. V3 said that V15 should perform hand hygiene after incontinence care and before handling clean brief. On 12/9/25 at 12:01PM, Informed V2 Director of Nursing (DON) of above observation and concern. Requested for hand hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their pressure injury prevention and wound care management policy for one resident who was at moderate risk for skin breakdown by not implementing an air loss mattress, delay in evaluation by wound care doctor, failing to document skin assessments on admission/weekly, failure to obtain physician orders and document treatments. This affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for wound care. Findings include: R1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, anemia, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, hypertension, and heart disease. R13's Braden scale dated 2/13/25 documents moderate risk for skin breakdown. R1's admission screener dated 1/30/25 document under skin coccyx tiny skin opening. R1's progress note dated 1/31/25 documents: Readmit from skilled unit. Seen by V5 (MD),orders verified and noted. Skin check done. With skin discoloration [greenish ] in back of right hand, with brownish skin discoloration in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow the individualized plan of care for safety to ensure a resident remains in common area when awake. This affected one of three (R1) residents reviewed for implementation of care plan interventions. Findings include: R1 face sheet denotes R1 has diagnosis of vascular dementia, unsteady on feet, history of falling, difficulty walking. R1 MDS dated 6.4.2023 section C denotes in-part attempt to conduct brief interview 0 is noted for No- resident rarely /never understood. Section C0700 denotes staff assessed R1 to have short term memory problems, and long-term memory problems. Cognitive skills for daily decision making- 2 are denoted for moderately impaired. 1 is denoted for yes there is evidence of acute change in mental status. One is denoted for inattention (behavior continuously present, does not fluctuate). One is denoted for disorganized thinking (behavior continuously present, does not fluctuate). Section E for behavior denotes Wandering- 3 (behavior of this type occurs daily). One is denoted that wandering places…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to supervise and monitor a resident with identified to be an elopement risk, wandering behavior, and poor safety awareness from exitingh the facility without staff knowledge. This affected one of three residents (R1) reviewed for supervsion and elopement risk. This failure resulted in R1 exiting the facility via wheel chair through an exit door without staff knowledge. R1 was eventually found outside past the exit door on the ground after falling from the wheelchair. R1 was sent to the local hospital for evaluation Findings include: R1 face sheet denotes R1 has diagnosis of vascular dementia, unsteady on feet, history of falling, difficulty walking. R1 MDS dated 6.4.2023 section C denotes in-part attempt to conduct brief interview 0 is noted for No- resident rarely /never understood. Section C0700 denotes staff assessed R1 to have short term memory problems, and long-term memory problems. Cognitive skills for daily decision making- 2 are denoted for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for preparing and storing food under sanitary conditions by not ensuring food was stored to prevent contamination, not ensuring all dishware, food storage containers, and kitchen equipment were properly cleaned, not ensuring kitchen employees and facility staff practiced appropriate hygiene in the kitchen area, and not performing safe food thawing practices. This failure has the potential to affect all 18 residents who currently reside in the facility and receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 05/15/23 from 09:50 AM - 10:05AM, observed a whole turkey thawing in a sink under sitting water. V12 (Dietary Manager) stated the turkey should be thawed under running water. Observed ice machine scoop stored in the ice machine in contact with ice. V12 stated the ice machine originally came with an internal storage piece for the scoop, however, the scoop is usually stored outside the ice machine in a holder. Observed V12 and V13 (Cook/Mentor) with their hairnets not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that multidose vials and insulin pens are labeled with dates opened; and discontinued medications are disposed of per policy. This failure affected two (R2 and R122) of two residents reviewed for medication storage and labeling. Findings include: Per facility matrix dated [DATE], current census is 18 residents. On [DATE] at 10:36 AM during inspection of medication room and medication carts, the following were observed: Three multidose vials of Tubersol, opened and undated as to its first use were observed stored in the refrigerator in the medication room. V6 (Registered Nurse, RN) was asked if the vials should be dated when opened. V6 stated, We're supposed to label it with date opened, expiry date and our initials. Inside medication cart number 2, R2's and R122's Insulin Glargine pens were observed opened and used but not dated. V6 verbalized, We have to date the insulin pens when opened, because it is only good for 30 days from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedures for fall prevention by not comprehensively assessing risks for all falls and not ensuring fall interventions were implemented for a resident who is at high risk of falls. This failure applied to one (R122) of four residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: R122 is an [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses history including Dementia, Alzheimer's, Restlessness and Agitation, Bipolar Disorder, Anxiety Disorder, Difficulty in Walking, Unsteadiness on Feet, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, and Chronic Congestive Heart Failure who was admitted to the facility 03/16/23. The facility's fall log from 11/15/22 to 05/15/23 documents R122 had 15 unwitnessed falls from 03/28/23 - 05/15/23. There were no post fall/fall risk assessments completed for R122's falls occurring 03/26/23, 03/28/23, 03/31/23, 04/05/23, and 04/08/23. R122's medical records did not include progress notes or incident reports for 10 of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PROSPECT HEIGHTS OPERATIONS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 03/01/2024
CHICAGOLAND SENIOR LIVING HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2024
APPOLLONA PARTNERS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/28/2024
EMPOWER STAFFING LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
JOHN ANTOLIK REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/19/2024
SARA YEVEROVICH REVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
STERN FAMILY INVESTMENT TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
BERMAN, ILYAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
BOYKO, OLEGIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
KEENER, DANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
LERMAN, YECHOVEDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
LIBERMAN, ROBERTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
MALISHEVICH, MIKHAILIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
MAUER, DOVIEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
NEMAD, BORISIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
POLSTEIN, MORDECHAIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
RICE, PAMELAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
STESEL, MAXIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
ZARKH, GLEBIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2024
PROSPECT HEIGHTS REALTY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
VISTA SENIOR MANAGEMENT LIVING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
KROPP, CHRISTOPHERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
HUSSAIN, JAWWADIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 48 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-19.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 11%Other / private 89%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$381per resident / day
operating cost
$11,592per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Illinois Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145852. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next