Good Samaritan Home
2130 Harrison Street, Quincy, IL 62301 · Non profit - Corporation · 203 certified beds · (217) 223-8717 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (16) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,640 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-19)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.5% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.2% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.0% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.2% | 20.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.2% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.8% | 26.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.8% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.82 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.02 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 39.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.9%CMS range 42.2–56.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.4–15.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 39.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 87.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 3.7–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.78 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 203 beds and averages 95.0 residents a day — about 47% occupied, or roughly 108 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.08 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.05 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.17 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
16 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond immediately to a sounding exit door alarm, failed to adequately supervise a known wandering resident (R8), failed to re-assess R8 as high risk for elopement once R8 started to exit seek, failed to develop and implement interventions and plan of care to address R8's exit-seeking behaviors after R8 attempted to exit seek, and failed investigate and report R8's elopement thoroughly for one of three residents (R8) reviewed for elopement in the sample of 41. These failures resulted in R8, a severely cognitively impaired resident with the diagnosis of Dementia, eloping from the facility approximately 70 feet from the facility, falling, and being found on the curb next to the road, after attempting to exit the building earlier that evening on 6-7-23. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. While the immediacy was removed on 8-19-23, the facility remains out of compliance at a severity Level II as the facility continues to investigate R8's elopement on June 7, 2023, and provide a final report to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2022-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Infection Prevention and Control Program policy was followed, failed to screen all staff for COVID-19 symptoms before the start of their scheduled shifts, filed to remove symptomatic employees from work immediately, failed to test and quarantine employees who had symptoms of COVID-19 immediately, and failed isolate residents who were unvaccinated or not up to date with the COVID-19 vaccination immediately after exposure to COVID-19 positive employees. These failure affected 24 of 24 residents (R4, R7, R12, R20, R22, R26, R38, R45, R49, R51, R63, R64, R72, R83, R85, R87, R88, R90, R91, R93, R94, R100, R107, R256) reviewed for COVID-19 infection control procedures in the sample of 60. These failures resulted in numerous symptomatic COVID-19 positive staff working directly with residents, resulting in an outbreak of COVID-19 within the facility and 24 residents developing symptomatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided timely provider notifications to ensure medical intervention was received with an acute change in condition for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for change in condition in the sample of four. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing a delay in evaluation and treatment while experiencing an acute ischemic stroke.Findings include:The facility's Change in Resident Condition Policy, dated 10/8/24, documents, Standard: The attending physician, resident representative, and RCC (Resident Care Coordinator) will be notified of any change in the condition of a resident. Policy: A significant change in a resident's condition must be relayed to the physician, resident, representative, RCC, and DON (Director of Nursing) or ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) timely. Procedure: 2. Any significant change in a resident's condition must be immediately relayed by phone to the attending physician and the resident representative. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions for 2 (R1 and R3) of 3 residents reviewed for wound care in a total sample of 5. Findings Include:The facility's undated Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy documents: It is the policy of the facility to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions in addition to standard precautions as a method of infection control, requiring the use of gown and gloves in situations of high-contact resident care. Definition: Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms. EBP requires gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities and prevents the spread of infection to and among residents and staff. EBP will also be initiated for all residents with indwelling medical devices such as, but not limited to central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes and tracheostomies. A peripheral intravenous line (not peripherally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-27 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide documentation by a physician regarding the basis of a resident's involuntary discharge with indications for why a resident should not return to the facility following hospitalization, what resident needs could not be met at the facility, what the facility's efforts were to meet those needs, and the specific services the receiving facility could provide to meet the needs of the resident which could not be met at the facility for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for involuntary discharge in the sample of four. Findings include: R1's Progress Notes, dated 8-31-24 at 4:00 PM, document R1 was sent to the emergency room by ambulance due to R1 having combative behaviors, threatening staff and (V10/R1's Family Member), hallucinating, and having increased paranoia. R1's Progress Notes, dated 9-1-24 at 2:16 AM, document R1 was being admitted to the hospital for treatment of a urinary tract infection and chronic kidney disease. R1's Progress Notes, dated 9-12-24 at 3:00 PM and signed by V4/Admission's Coordinator,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-27 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident, resident's representative, and the Ombudsman in writing of the reasons for discharge for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for involuntary discharge notice in the sample of four. Findings include: The Ombudsman's Residents' 'Rights for People in Long-Term Care Facilities policy, dated 11/2018, documents, You have the right to keep living in your facility. You must be given written notice if your facility wants you to move from the facility. The notice must: tell you why your facility wants you to move; tell you how to appeal the decision to the Illinois Department of Public Health; and provide a stamped and addressed envelope for you to mail your appeal in. R1's Progress Notes, dated 8-31-24 at 4:00 PM, document R1 was sent to the emergency room by ambulance due to R1 having combative behaviors, threatening staff and (V10/R1's Family Member), hallucinating, and having increased paranoia. R1's Progress Notes, dated 9-1-24 at 2:16 AM, document R1 was being admitted to the hospital for treatment of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-27 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to a resident and a resident's representative upon transfer to the hospital for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for bed hold notice in the sample of four. Findings include: The facility's Bed Hold and readmission Policy, dated 10-26-18, documents, Purpose: The primary purpose of the policy for bed hold and readmission to (the facility) is to establish uniform guidelines for the resident, family member, or legal representative in the event a resident is transferred to a hospital, to another level of care, or takes a leave of absence from the home. A written copy of the bed-hold policy will be provided to the resident at the time of transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave. R1's Progress Notes, dated 8-31-24, document R1 was sent to the emergency room and admitted to the hospital. R1's Medical Record does not include documentation of a bed hold noticed being given to R1 nor (V10/R1's Family Member) after R1 was sent to the hospital on 8-31-24. On 10-25-24 at 11:28 AM, V10 (R1's Family…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use the Heat Stickers to ensure dishes reach the correct/required surface temperature when in the rinse cycle in the dish machine and failed to have staff wash hands with soap and water as required between handling dirty dishes and clean dishes in the dish room. This has the potential to affect all 101 residents living in the facility. Findings: 1. The document, Dish Machine Temperature Recording for Food Service Staff Policy, 4/2024, states, It is the policy of the Food Service Department that the acceptable wash temperature (should be) 150 - 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the acceptable rinse temperature is 180 degrees F or above. Any temperature reading below 150 degrees F wash, or 180 degrees F rinse should be noted, and a department supervisor or designee notified. On 8/12/24 at 10:55 AM, V5, Assistant Dietary Manager, stated, We do not use the Surface Temperature Stickers for the dish machine. You (Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Surveyor) had me get the (surface temperature stickers) last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report bruises of unknown origin to the State Agency for two of two residents (R35 and R81) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 34. Findings include: Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy, dated 6/19/2021, documents, Internal Reporting Requirements and identification of Allegations: Any reasonable suspicion of a crime against a resident or individual receiving care from the facility, including but not limited to, alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation of mistreatment including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property must be reported to the state survey agency (IDPH/Illinois Department of Public Health) under the following time frames: Alleged Abuse or Serious Bodily Injury - Immediately but no later than 2 (two) hours after forming the suspicion. Allegation of neglect, exploitation, mistreatment, or misappropriation of resident property and does not result in serious bodily injury -not later than 24 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to initiate abuse investigations for bruises of unknown origin for two of two residents (R35 and R81) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 34. Findings include: Abuse Prevention Program Facility Policy, dated 6/19/2021, documents, Internal Reporting Requirements and identification of Allegations, The nursing staff is responsible for reporting on a facility incident report the appearance of bruises, lacerations, or other abnormalities as they occur. Upon report of such occurrences, the nursing supervisor is responsible for assessing the resident, reviewing the documentation, and reporting to the administrator. If the resident complains of physical injuries or if resident harm is suspected, the resident physician will be contacted for further instructions. Internal Investigation of Abuse, Neglect or Misappropriation Allegations and Response. 1. All incidents will be documented, whether or not abuse occurred, was alleged or suspected. 2. Any incident or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred safely during a shower to avoid falling for one of five residents (R45) reviewed for falls in the sample of 34. Findings include: The facility's Program for Reduction of Fall Risk, dated 7/23/15, documents, As part of the program for the prevention of falls, all newly admitted residents and those residents experiencing a change in function will be assessed for the risk of falls. Interventions to prevent falls will be implemented on the basis of the risk assessment. Purpose: To prevent falls and enable staff to recognize those residents who have been found to be at increased risk for falls. R45's current Care Plan, dated 5/28/24, documents, I (R45) have had a decline in my strength/independence during transfers. I use a (mechanical lift) lift for transfers. This same Care Plan documents, I am at increased risk for falls related to impaired cognition, poor safety awareness, diuretic use and weakness. I use a mechanical lift. R45's Safety Event Fall report, dated 7/19/24, documents R45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of potential verbal abuse to the administrator and the State Agency for one of three residents (R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of three. Findings include: The Facility's Abuse Prevention Program, dated 7/24/19, states, Employees are required to report any incident, allegation, or suspicion of potential abuse, neglect or misappropriation of property they observe, hear about, or suspect to the administrator or the person in charge of the facility acting on behalf of the administrator, or an immediate supervisor who must then immediately notify the administrator. A Final Incident Investigation Report, dated 11/6/23, documents an employee, V5/Dietary staff, reported R2 was attempting to get up from her chair after lunch, and V7/Licensed Practical Nurse was heard raising her voice at R2 and trying to get R2 to sit back down. This same investigation documents the incident occurred on 11/5/23, but was not reported to the Administrator or the State Agency until 11/6/23. On 11/14/23 at 2:10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess a resident for an underlying condition prior to increasing an anti-psychotic medication, and failed to attempt gradual dose reductions of an anti-psychotic medication for one of four residents (R8) reviewed for anti-psychotic use with the diagnosis of Dementia in the sample of 41. Findings include: The facility's Medication Monitoring Psychotropic Drug Management Program Policy, dated 3-11-19, documents, There will be an attempt at dose reduction of psychotropic medications and/or attempts of alternative behavioral interventions in two separate quarters at least one month apart and then annually thereafter. R8's admission Physician's Order Sheets (POS's), dated 5-5-20, document Risperidone one mg (milligram) at bedtime daily for the diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia without behavioral disturbance. R8's POSs, dated 4-29-21, document R8's Risperidone was increased to one mg at bedtime daily and 0.5 mg daily at 8:00 AM daily, for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-08 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) action plan to address symptomatic staff to resident COVID-19 outbreaks within the facility. This failure had the potential to affect all 114 residents residing within the facility. Findings include: The CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) Form 672 (Resident Census and Conditions of Residents), dated 8-31-22 and signed by V2 (Director of Nursing), documents 114 residents reside within the facility. The facility's Quality Assurance Performance Improvement policy, dated 2-11-21, documents, The long term care facility will develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven QAPI program that focuses on indicators of outcomes of care and quality of life. Based on resident interviews, observations, family interviews, or record reviews any issues that are identified as potentially causing harm to the resident will be immediately brought to the attention of the administrator, addressed, and resolved. Performance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-08 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to offer and administer all required boosters for the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) vaccinations to maintain these residents up to date for 24 of 26 residents (R3, R7, R11, R20, R26, R35, R41, R45, R50, R51, R63, R64, R75, R78, R79, R80, R81, R88, R89, R90, R91, R93, R96, R104) reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations in the sample of 60. Findings include: The facility's COVID-19 Infection Prevention and Control Program policy, dated March 22, 2022, documents, Description: (The facility) has developed a COVID-19 infection prevention and control program to decrease the risk of residents and staff becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2), the virus that causes COVID-19. Vaccinations and Vaccine Boosters: COVID-19 vaccinations and vaccine boosters will be offered to all consenting and eligible employees and residents onsite at scheduled dates and times through the (local health department). Additional vaccination locations will be used as they become…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a Physician ordered diet to one of three residents (R72) reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 60. Findings include: The facility's Using the Diet Order Communication Form Policy, dated 2022, documents, In health care communities, nutritional care and selection of diet therapy is accomplished through an organized process of assessment and communication. In licensed long term care communities, this occurs after admission, with diet order being written by the attending Physician or authorized designee (such as Registered and /or Licensed Dietitian when allowed by state regulator and licensing authorities). The Diet Order Form is a suggested tool to assist with the communication between nursing and dining services to ensure proper and accurate implementation of the Physician's order. It is suggested that the Dining Services Manager periodically review the written Physician's diet orders against the meal cards to ensure accuracy of meal delivery/service. R72's Nutritional Status plan of care, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,640 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $26,640 — penalty dated 2023-08-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| BARNES, ERIC | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 10/01/2022 |
| BIGELOW, SHARON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 10/01/2023 |
| BLICKHAN, GARY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2015 |
| CANFIELD, BRIAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2022 |
| DANIELS, CHRIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 10/01/2018 |
| DURANTE, BRIAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2022 |
| GABRIEL, MARTIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2021 |
| GIBBS, PATRICIA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2021 |
| HIGGINS, SHARON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2016 |
| KERN, KELLY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2024 |
| OTT, JOSEPH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2019 |
| RILEY, RANDY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2015 |
| WAVERING, STEVE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2024 |
| WHITE, TIM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2022 |
| DORIAN, MATTHEW | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 05/24/2021 |
| ANDERSON, HALLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/06/2025 |
| MCLEOD, EMMA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/22/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145773. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.