No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Friendship Manor

1209 21st Avenue, Rock Island, IL 61201 · Non profit - Corporation · 94 certified beds · (309) 786-9667 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (309) 786-9667 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited May 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$10,519 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • the CMS record shows $10,519 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-09)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Riverside0.7 mi
2701 17th St · (309) 779-2999 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.8 mi
3100 11th St · (309) 786-4312 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2369 11th St · (309) 317-6664 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1619 18th Ave · (309) 732-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1115 21st Ave · (309) 794-9621

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.7%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.4%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.3%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.7%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.5%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened33.2%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.2%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.3%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.6%20.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.2%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.8%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit22.7%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.152.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.622.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

42.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
26.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.03U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Met the expected recovery: 26.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 42 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF42.2%CMS range 32.6–51.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.8%CMS range 8.0–16.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge26.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge26.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.0%CMS range 3.4–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.91
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
37.4%
Total nursing turnover
35.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 86.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.16 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-24)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-19)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (R1) was transferred safely. This failure resulted in R1 falling and fracturing her right femur.The findings include: On 9/12/25 at 12:45 PM, V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) said she was R1's CNA when R1 fell on the morning of 9/2/25. V9 said a couple days prior when she was caring for R1, R1 complained of arm pain and wanted to get up in her chair because of her arm pain. The morning of 9/2/25, R1 complained of right arm pain again and asked V9 to put her in her chair (recliner). V9 said she changed and dressed R1 with pants, shoes, socks, and a clean brief, then she helped position R1 on the side of her bed. V9 said she put the transfer aid device/lift machine, up against the bed and assisted R1 to put her feet on the platform, then R1 grabbed the bar and V9 used the back of R1's pants to help her stand up. V9 said the lift machine was so close to the bed, she couldn't get the paddles down, so she took the brakes off and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was safely positioned in bed for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for safety in the sample of 5. This failure resulted in R2 falling from her bed and sustaining a laceration requiring staples. The findings include: R2's physician visit form documents she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including vascular dementia, and history of falling. R2's quarterly resident assessment and care screening of 2/17/25 documents her to have severe cognitive impairment. Her mobility assessment shows she requires substantial/maximal assistance with rolling right to left. Meaning the helper provides more than half of the effort to perform the task. The 2/17/25 care plan for hospice services notes R2 requires extensive to dependent assistance with 1 staff for all cares and uses a mechanical lift for transfers. The facility incident report of 3/26/25 documents R2 had a fall at 4:50 AM in her bedroom by the bedside.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the facility's fall program and provide supervision for three (R15, R18, and R60) of six residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 28. These failures resulted in: R15's hospitalization resulting from nasal fractures; R18's hospitalization resulting from a tibial fracture; and R60's hospitalizations resulting from a right hip fracture and then left hip fracture. Findings include: The facility's undated Managing Falls and Fall Risk policy and procedure, documents: Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Resident-Centered Approaches to Managing Falls and Fall Risk: 1. The staff will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls . 5. If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and use two staff members to perform a mechanical lift transfer for one of three Residents (R1) reviewed for Falls in a sample of six.Findings include:The Facility Lifting Machine, Using a Mechanical Lift Policy, revised 7/2017, documents: to establish general principles of safe lifting using a mechanical lifting device; at least two people are needed to safely move a Resident with a mechanical lift; and before the Resident is lifted, double check the security of the sling attachment; check the stability of the straps.The Facility Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents Policy, revised 9/17/25, documents: to protect the safety and well-being of staff and Residents to promote quality care, this Facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move Residents; Resident safety, dignity, comfort and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of Residents; staff responsible for direct Resident care will be trained in the use of mechanical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions throughout the facility to protect vulnerable residents and prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs). This failure has the potential to affect all 73 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 8/2022, documents Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) are utilized to prevent the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not otherwise apply. Examples of high contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBPs include Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Providing Hygiene, Changing Linens, Changing briefs or Assisting with toileting, Device care or use (Central Line, Urinary Catheter, Feeding Tube, Tracheostomy/Ventilator), and Wound Care (any skin opening requiring a dressing). This same policy also documents EBPs are indicated (when contact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store food items in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility refrigerator by not discarding outdated food items. This failure has the potential to affect all 79 Residents residing in the Facility. Findings include: Facility Census and Conditions Report, dated 7/16/23, documents 79 Residents residing in the Facility. Facility Food Storage Policy and Procedure Manual, dated 3/2023, documents: sufficient storage facilities will be provided to keep foods safe, wholesome and appetizing; food will be stored by methods designed to prevent contamination or cross contamination; food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves if required by state regulation; leftover food must be used within three days or discarded; and all foods should be covered, labeled and dated and routinely monitored to assure foods (including leftovers) will be consumed by their safe use by dates or discarded. On 07/16/23, at 6:35 am, the Facility refrigerator located closest to the food preparation area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform catheter care in a clean manner for one resident (R62) of three residents reviewed for catheters in a total sample of 38. This failure resulted in R62 having repeated Urinary Tract Infections. Findings Include: The Facility's undated Catheter Care Policy documents the purpose of this procedure is to prevent urinary catheter-associated complications, including urinary tract infections. General Guidelines: follow aseptic technique. The Center for Disease Control website documents Require healthcare personnel to perform hand hygiene in accordance with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. Use an alcohol-based hand rub or wash with soap and water for the following clinical indications: Immediately before touching a patient; Before performing an aseptic task (e.g., placing an indwelling device) or handling invasive medical devices; Before moving from work on a soiled body site to a clean body site on the same patient; After touching a patient or the patient ' s immediate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify an appropriate indication for use of an antipsychotic medication and failed to identify specific target behaviors in the care plan for one residents (R178) with Dementia diagnosis of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 38. Findings include: Facility Policy/Psychopharmacological Medication Use (undated) documents: Residents will receive psychotropic medication when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. Policy does not include obtaining consent to administer psychotropic medications, indications or expressions of distress or potential adverse consequences. On 7/18/23 at 2:45pm V9 (Social Service Director/SSD) acknowledged the facility's Psychotropic policy is very outdated and does not cover some of the necessary elements of psychotropic medication management. 1) Current Physician's Orders indicate R178 is [AGE] years old, was admitted on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-05-09 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to COVID-19 test unvaccinated staff two times a week. This has the potential to affect all 71 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Plan for Staff and Residents Who Aren't Vaccinated or Won't Test, no date available, documents, Staff who aren't vaccinated or aren't up to date must file for an exemption; Exemptions are tracked through the HR (Human Resources) department. Staff who aren't vaccinated or aren't up to date must test according to mandated schedules. The facility's COVID-19 Daily Briefing, dated 5/2/22, documents, Next testing round: Monday & Thursday 1:00-3:00 p.m.; testing frequency two times this week for all not up to date staff. The facility's Fully Unvaccinated staff log, provided on 5/5/22 by V4 (Assistant Administrator), documents that V8 and V19 (Both Certified Nursing Assistants) are not vaccinated due to religious exemptions. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Data Tracker, Community Transmission Level, the Community Transmission Level in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three allegations of abuse were immediately reported to the Administrator for three of five residents (R12, R17 and R39) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 39. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Investigation and Reporting policy (revised 7/2017) documents the following: All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. This policy also documents, Reporting: All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the facility Administrator, or his/her designee to the following persons or agencies: The state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility; The resident's representative (sponsor) of record; Adult protective…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Care Plans were revised following a physical altercation between residents for two of five residents (R21 and R65) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 39. Findings include: The facility's Incident Report Investigation (dated 03/31/22) documents R65 cursed at R21, punched R21 in the leg, and ran over R21's feet when propelling her wheelchair attempting to exit the dining room. R21 and the R65 were immediately separated, R65 was placed on 15-minute checks and the new intervention to provide R65 with a walker to ambulate to and from the dining room during meals for easier entrance and exit was implemented. R21's and R65's current Care Plans have no documentation of the 03/31/22 incident that occurred in the dining room. On 05/04/22 at 1:50 PM, V10 (Social Service Director) stated that R65's and R21's Care Plans were not revised to note the physical altercation that occurred on 03/31/22.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to stage and assess a pressure ulcer when it was discovered, perform incontinence care prior to wound care, and perform hand hygiene during pressure ulcer care for one of two residents (R59) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 39. Findings include: The facility's Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown policy, dated 4/2018, documents, The nurse shall describe and document/report the following: Full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudates or necrotic tissue. The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy, no date available, documents, This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: All nursing staff shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or alternatively, soap and water for the following situations: After…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use a gait belt and provide supervision while transferring a dependent resident for one of two residents (R46) reviewed for falls in the sample of 39. Findings include: The facility's (undated) Transferring with use of Gait Belt policy, documents, Purpose: To safely assist in resident transfer while minimizing the chance of injury to staff or resident. R46's Profile Face Sheet documents R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Unsteadiness on Feet, Muscle Weakness (generalized), Unspecified Dementia Without Behavioral Disturbance and History of Falling. R46's Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 3/21/22, documents R46 requires extensive assistance of one person for walking and toileting. R46's Nursing admission Evaluation, dated 9/16/21, documents Fall Risk: (R46's has/had a) Fall in the last 30 days, Impaired balance, Cardiovascular drug (prescription medication) use, Unsteady gait (walking), Impaired safety awareness. R46's Post…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-09 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all facility staff have been fully vaccinated for COVID-19, unvaccinated staff have requested an exemption, and failed to track and document all facility contract staff for COVID-19 vaccination status. This has the potential to affect all 71 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Plan for Staff and Residents Who Aren't Vaccinated or Won't Test, no date available, documents, Staff who aren't vaccinated or aren't up to date must file for an exemption; Exemptions are tracked through the HR (Human Resources) department. Staff who aren't vaccinated or aren't up to date must test according to mandated schedules. The facility's Visitor/Vendor Access Information, provided on 5/2/22 by V2 (Director of Nursing), documents, Vendors who are providing direct care (touching/being directly close to residents) are not allowed to come in unless they are on the list below or provide a copy of their up to date COVID-19 vaccination card or provide an up to date card on the spot (a copy must be taken for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$10,519 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $10,519 — penalty dated 2025-04-09
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-22 for 12 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AUSTIN, ANNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
CHRISTOPHER, ADAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
COLVIN, DAMONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
DEPAUW ELSBERG, CHRISTINEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DOYLE, SHEAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
FOLEY, MOLLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
HULLON, JESSEYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
LOQUIST, JONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2021
MCEVOY, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
PAPPAS, THEODOSISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/08/2005
ROGALSKI, EDWARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
SHATTUCK, MOLLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
SPITZFADEN, THOMASIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
TALLMAN, ELIZABETHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
THORSON, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DEVINNEY, PATRICKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2008
LEVERENZ, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2021
STALEY, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 18%Medicare 5%Other / private 76%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$727per resident / day
operating cost
$22,087per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$287per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146099. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next