Alpine Fireside Health Center
3650 North Alpine Road, Rockford, IL 61114 · For profit - Corporation · 66 certified beds · (815) 877-7408 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jan 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (22) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $85,050 in federal fines (most recent 2025-12-07)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 15.3% | 13.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.4% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.7% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.9% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.9% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.2% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.5% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.3% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.2% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 38.3% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 7.1% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.2% | 63.1% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.0% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.8% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.81 | 2.02 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.33 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.1%CMS range 34.4–48.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.9–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 25.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 94.7% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 93.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.7%CMS range 4.9–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 34.3 residents a day — about 52% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.18 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.83 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
22 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for falls in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 falling and sustaining a right hip fracture and right knee fracture.The findings include:R1's Progress Note dated 12/23/25 shows Approximately 1:30 AM, R1 alarm was sounding and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) observed R1 on floor, lying on right side. R1 complained of pain to right hip during range of motion. R1 is alert and oriented to self, has a history of falls, and has diagnosis Alzheimer's ad Dementia. R1 has poor safety awareness, has impaired decision making and requires frequent redirection from staff.R1's Emergency Department Provider Note dated 12/23/25 shows R1 presents to the Emergency Department following a fall at the skilled nursing facility. The patient has sustained a right intertrochanteric (hip) fracture. She also sustained a right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to identify a pressure wound before developing into an unstageable pressure injury for one (R1). The facility also failed to prevent the development of three facility acquired State 2 pressure ulcers and one facility acquired unstageable pressure ulcer, a Stage 2 pressure ulcer worsening to unstageable, prevent cross contamination during dressing changes and apply pressure reduction devices for one (R2). This failure applies to two of three residents (R1 & R2) reviewed for pressure on the total sample of three. The findings include:1. The Physician Orders for August 2025 for R1 showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility's Body Check Form dated 8/14/25 for R1 documented R1 did not have a pressure injury to his coccyx.A Note dated 8/26/25 at 10:27 PM for R1 documented, R1 has a wound to the coccyx. It was covered with a dressing. Will notify power of attorney - POA tomorrow and do documentation. Initiated treatment to clean…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident coffee was served at a safe temperature for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of four. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining second degree burns to her thigh and calf. The findings include: The facility's incident report dated 12/31/24 showed R1 spilled coffee on herself on a Sunday (12/29/24). The report showed the physician and nurse practitioner had been notified. The report was completed by V3 (Director of Nurses). R1's undated record of admission form showed an admission date of 12/13/24 and a discharge date of 12/30/24. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed diagnoses including but not limited to fracture of the right femur, hypertension, anemia, and osteoporosis. The same assessment showed severe cognitive impairment and staff supervision or touch assistance required for eating. On 1/9/25 at 4:32 PM, V8 (CNA-Certified Nurse Aide) stated he was assigned to R1 the afternoon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's pain medication was administered for pain control. This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for pain in the sample of 5. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] following right femur fracture repair. R1's diagnosis includes peripheral vascular disease, Alzheimer's disease late onset, dementia unspecified, falls, diabetes, and osteoarthritis. R1's Physician Orders dated December 2025 shows orders including oxycodone (opioid) 5mg (milligrams) every 4 hours as needed for moderate or severe pain. R1's nurses notes dated 12/27/25 at 1:38 PM documents behaviors yelling/screaming. Pain severe pain interventions include scheduled pain medication administrated and as needed medication administration. R1's Medication Administration Record (M.A.R.) dated December 2025 shows there was no pain medication administered at 1:38 PM for R1's pain. R1's M.A.R. shows acetaminophen 325 mg was given…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation of monies. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for misappropriation in the sample of 8. The findings include:On 1/20/26 at 11:55 AM, R2 stated, she wanted to get her hair done but wasn't sure what day the hairdresser would be in. She asked her son to bring her some money so she could pay for her hair to be done. He brought the money in and put it in her purse in the bottom drawer of a dresser in her room. A day or two later, she went to get the money out of her purse and found the money was gone. She told her son the money was gone and asked him to bring her more so she could get her hair done. On 1/20/26 at 1:02 PM, V14 R2's son stated, his mom had asked him to bring $90.00 on Tuesday (1/6/26) because she wanted to get a hair cut and perm. Her hair appointment was scheduled for Thursday morning (1/8/26). He brought the money to her that evening and put it in her purse in the bottom drawer of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation of a resident's monies. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for misappropriation in the sample of 8. The findings include:On 1/20/26 at 11:55 AM, R2 stated, she had money stolen from the facility. The facility's reported incident report (no date) shows, R2 had money missing from her room. The same report continues to show, Several staff of varying departments and across all shifts were interviewed. No reports of questionable behavior reported. Cameras reviewed between the time Resident's son reportedly provided the $90.00 and the time of initial report. All staff that entered the room were assigned to the Resident. The times that each staff entered the room are appropriate for each staff's assigned responsibility. Staff that entered the room were interviewed, no concerns were identified. On 1/21/26 facility surveillance video footage from 1/6/26 starting at approximately 4:30 PM to 1/8/26 at approximately 8:30 AM was viewed with V16 Dietary Manager/IT and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with the diagnosis of dementia and known aggressive behaviors was cared for in a manner to prevent injury. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for dementia in the sample of 8. The findings include:R1's electronic medical records list his diagnoses to include: vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and benign prostatic hypertension. On 1/20/26 at 10:15 AM, R1 was sitting up in a reclining wheelchair in his room. He had a yellow, green and purple bruise under his right eye. A small red spot on the upper left side of his lip with some faint bruising to his chin. The spot appeared as if it was scabbed over and the scab recently fell off. R1 was very confused and incoherent. V3 R1's wife was in the room with R1. She stated, R1 got the bruising about a week prior. She had visited him on a Friday evening (1/9/26) and the facility called on 1/11/26 saying they found R1 with bruising to his right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure bed hold notices were provided for 2 residents (R1, R38) and failed to notify the ombudsman of resident transfers and discharges for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R38, R40) reviewed for discharge requirements in the sample of 12. The findings include: R38's face sheet and transfer packet shows he was transferred from the facility to the hospital on [DATE]. R38 did not return to the facility he was discharged to another placement. There is no bed hold or documentation in his electronic medical record (EMR) that one was provided on transfer or during hospitalization to R38 or to his representative. There is no documentation in the EMR that V14 (Ombudsman) was notified of his transfer or discharge. R40's face sheet and discharge summary shows he was a planned discharge from the facility on [DATE]. There is no documentation showing V14 was notified of his discharge. R1's facesheet and transfer packet shows she was transferred from the facility to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided timely for a resident that requires assistance for one of 12 residents (R32) reviewed for ADL care in the sample of 12.The findings include:R32's Record of admission shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R32's Physician Orders show she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including anorexia, polyarthritis, excoriation disorder, difficulty walking, and paranoid schizophrenia.On December 8, 2025, at 11:20 AM, V9 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stood R32 up via the mechanical stand lift. There was a large wet circle to the back of R32's pants. V9 placed R32 onto the toilet and removed R32's incontinence brief. R32 had a thick disposable incontinence pad plus an incontinence brief on. Both the pad and the brief were saturated with urine. There was a strong urine smell. V9 said that R32 has an incontinence pad and incontinence brief on because R32 is a heavy wetter.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were in place for a resident with a pressure injury for one of two residents (R3) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 12.The findings include:R3's Record of admission shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's Diagnoses Report shows she was admitted with diagnoses including sepsis, urinary tract infection, dementia, and pressure injury of sacral region.R3's Potential for skin breakdown assessment dated [DATE], shows she is a high risk for pressure injuries. R3 has an air mattress.R3's Physician Orders dated December 1, 2025-December 31, 2025, shows orders for waffle boots while in bed.R3's Care plan dated December 9, 2025, shows, Encourage resident to float heels while in bed and air mattress in bed.R3's Weekly Wound Assessment and Summary dated December 5, 2025, shows she has two stage 4 pressure injuries to her sacrum. These assessments show that R3 uses a low air loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to supervise a resident with a high risk of falls and a history of falls for 1 of 12 residents (R2) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 12.The findings include:R2's Record of admission shows she was admitted to the facility June 7, 2024. R2's Client Diagnosis Report shows she has diagnoses including depression, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, urinary tract infection, dementia, and nondisplaced fracture of lateral malleolus.R2's Fall Incidences shows that she fell five times in the last four months. R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], shows she is at risk for falls.R2's Care Plan effective October 30, 2025, shows R2 is at risk for falls and R2 self-transfers at times. Alarms on chair and bed to alert staff of unplanned movement and will receive oversight assistance with transfers to reduce the risk of falls.On December 8, 2025, at 1:33 PM there was a chair alarm going off in R2's room. V16 Certified Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. There were 28 opportunities with three errors resulting in a 10.71% error rate. This applies to two of five residents (R30, R24) observed in the medication pass. The findings include:1. R30's Record of admission shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE].R30's Client Diagnosis Report shows she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia, alcohol use with alcohol induced persisting dementia, anemia, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure, moderate protein malnutrition, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, delusional disorder, hypokalemia, anorexia, and dementia.R30's Medication Record dated December 1, 2025-December 31, 2025 shows orders for phosphorus/potassium/sodium give one packet by mouth four times daily at 8:00 AM, 12:00 PM, 5:00 PM, and 8:00 PM and calcium 600 mg (milligrams) + vitamin D3 20 mcg (micrograms) daily.On December 8, 2025, at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff wore personal protective equipment when providing a dressing change for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for wounds in the sample of three.The findings include:On 12/7/25 at 2:25 PM, R3 was laying in bed and V3 Registered Nurse - RN was at bedside with gloves on and had just completed the wound vac dressing change to R3's right knee. V3 did not have a gown on. V6 RN/Wound Care Nurse entered R3's room wearing a gown and gloves to troubleshoot the wound vac dressing. After V3 and V6 left R3's room, R3 stated V3 did not have a gown on when she did her dressing change. On 12/7/25 at 4:00 PM, V2 Director of Nursing stated gown and gloves are to be worn when doing close contact care to prevent contamination and infection. The Care Plan dated 11/6/25 for R3 showed, resident on isolation related to methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus - MRSA of nares, MRSA of right knee surgical wound revision. Protective personal equipment to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 9 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff safely transferred a resident who has history of falls. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including right hip fracture, hypertension, chronic kidney disease and congestive heart failure. On 2/18/25 at 9:05 AM, R1 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair. R1 had a dark purple hematoma to her right forehead and bruising surrounding her right eye, and bruising to her right side of her face. R1 said she fell transferring from her bed to the wheelchair. She said V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant-CNA) was on the opposite side of the wheelchair, away from her, and did not apply a gait belt during the transfer. When she stood up she lost her balance and fell on her knees and hit her head on the corner of the bedside table. R1 said she fell at home prior to coming and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff covered an open wound, and failed to ensure food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner. These failures have the potential to affect all of the residents in the facility. The findings include: The CMS Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form CMS-671 dated 10/8/24 showed 39 residents resided in the facility. The facility's undated list of residents' Diet Orders, provided by the facility on 10/10/24 showed all 39 residents take food by mouth. No residents on the list had a feeding tube. On 10/8/24 at 9:57 AM, V6 (Dietary Manager) was preparing the lunch meal. V6 said he and V12 (Cook) were both preparing the lunch meal. V6 had an open wound to his right inner forearm that was not covered. There was a small smear next to the open wound that appeared to be blood. At 12:11 PM V6 obtained the food temperatures prior to serving. V6 still had the open wound uncovered. At 12:27 PM, V6 was asked about the wound on his right inner forearm. V6 said he scratched himself on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician was notified when blood glucose levels were out of the set parameters ordered by the physician for 1 of 1 resident (R5) reviewed for blood glucose levels in the sample of 14. The findings include: R5's Physician's Orders, provided by the facility on 10/10/24, showed an order dated 5/21/24 for Accucheck (blood glucose check) twice daily. Call doctor if greater than 250 or less than 70. R5's Plan of Care, provided by the facility on 10/10/24, showed she has the potential for hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic (high and low blood glucose level episodes secondary to diabetes). The plan of care showed to Monitor blood sugar levels per MD/NP (Doctor/Nurse Practitioner) order, notify MD/NP of abnormal findings with follow up as indicated. R5's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she had short-term and long-term memory problems, moderately impaired cognitive skills, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, except…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess pressure wounds weekly for 2 of 4 residents (R23, R15) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 14. The findings include: 1. R23's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R23's client diagnoses report printed 10/10/24 showed R23 had diagnoses of orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Alzheimer's disease. R23's care plan initiated 6/26/24 showed, Resident has a Stage 3 Pressure Injury to right hip . Observe for changes in pressure ulcer, report to MD if there is an increase in size or stage and follow up as indicated . R23's 6/25/24 wound assessment showed a wound to R23's right hip was identified on 6/24/24 and the first assessment was completed 6/25/24. R23's next wound assessments were completed as follows: 7/7/24 (11 days between assessments), 7/31/24 (24 days between…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform incontinence care in a manner to prevent cross contamination (R15), failed to initiate enhanced barrier precautions for a resident with an indwelling catheter and open wounds (R25), and failed to administer medications in a manner to prevent cross contamination (R18) for 3 of 3 residents (R15, R25, and R18) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 14. The findings include: 1. R15's Client Diagnostic Report, provided by the facility on 10/10/24 showed she had diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic diastolic (congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, venous insufficiency, anemia, ulcerative (chronic) pancolitis, diarrhea, acute kidney failure, essential tremor, Alzheimer's disease, and dementia. R15's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed she had short-term and long-term memory problems, and moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment showed R15 was dependent on staff for toileting and bathing and was at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for residents with a history of falls for 2 of 3 residents (R2, R3) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] showed R2 had eight (8) falls in the facility from 2/2/24-3/27/24. The assessment showed the facility utilized chair and bed alarms as fall interventions for R2. R2's current care plan showed R2 remained at high risk for falls related to her unsteady gait, history of previous falls, and diagnosis of dementia with behaviors. The care plan listed alarms on chair and bed to alert staff of unplanned movement as one of R2's fall interventions since 3/1/23. On 3/28/24 at 9:50 AM, R2 was in bed. R2's upper body (head, torso, buttocks) were on the bed. R2's legs were off the bed, propped up on the seat of a wheelchair, that was positioned next to R2's bed. No mats were noted on the floor next to R2's bed. Folded floor mats…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and distributed in a manner to prevent cross-contamination, failed to ensure food items in the refrigerator and freezer were labeled and dated with an open date and failed to ensure that kitchen was kept in sanitary condition. This applies to all 36 residents residing in the the facility. The findings include: The Resident Roster printed on 12/18/23 shows there are 36 residents residing at the facility. On 12/18/23 at 8:37 AM, there was an open bag of cranberry sauce and an unlabelled bag of a half angel food cake in the freezer. In the refrigerator there was a dried pink substance splattered on a bag of mozzarella cheese and on the lid of a mayonnaise container. There was a dried pink substance on the shelf of the refrigerator. There was a white liquid under the jar of mayonnaise and food debris scattered throughout the bottom of the refrigerator. In the walk in refrigerator there was an unlabeled plastic bag of roast beef, an unlabeled, uncovered tray of apple crisp, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff used required personal protective equipment (PPE) when entering an isolation room, failed to perform hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination and failed to ensure residents and staff were tested for COVID-19 to prevent the spread of infection. This applies to all 36 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: 1. A Resident Roster dated 12/18/23 shows that there are 36 residents residing in the facility. An undated facility provided list of residents who were COVID positive shows that a resident on the 200 Hall tested positive for COVID-19 on 11/13/23. The list shows that 20 residents on the 100 Hall and 200 Hall tested positive between 11/13/23 and 11/24/23. The list shows that by 11/16/23 there were residents on all hallways testing positive. On 12/19/23 at 10:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) said that the COVID-19 outbreak started on 11/13/23 and all staff and residents were tested on the 11/14/23 and 11/15/23. V1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer preventions were in place and failed to ensure ordered treatments were in place for one of four residents (R89) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 15. The findings include: R89's Physician Orders Sheet dated December 1, 2023-December 31, 2023 shows orders were entered on December 11, 2023 for: Float heels every shift, discoloration to left heel-paint with betadine, cover with foam dressing every evening shift, and buttocks wound area-cleanse with wound cleanser, apply A & D ointment, cover with abdominal dressing every evening shift. R89's Care Plan effective December 11, 2023 shows, Resident has stage I pressure injury to right buttocks and stage II pressure injury to coccyx. Treatment as order, monitor and report if ineffective. December 18, 2023-float heels with heel protectors or pillow when in bed as needed. R89's Body Check form dated December 11 & 13, 2023 shows R89 had wounds to her buttock and left and right heel. On December 18, 2023 at 1:26 PM, V4 CNA (Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$85,050 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $85,050 — penalty dated 2025-12-07
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-12-26 for 35 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NJOLSTAD-OKSNEVAD, ELLEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 05/01/2019 |
| OKSNEVAD, ERIK | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 05/01/2019 |
| OKSNEVAD, ROY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | 20% | since 05/01/2019 |
| KRAM, COLINDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/08/2026 |
| OKSNEVAD, HOLGEIR | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2019 |
| OXMATI MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/10/2025 |
| NIKA, VASIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2016 |
| ALPINE FIRESIDE PROPERTIES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/15/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $408K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146066. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.