Hillcrest Retirement Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 13.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 140 beds and averages 129.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.82 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.93 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 15% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to supervise a resident with a history of falls, failed to ensure a safe transfer was performed, and failed to review/revise fall interventions post fall for 3 of 24 residents (R114, R23, R93) reviewed for safety in the sample of 24. This failure resulting in R114 sustaining a right hip fracture and R23 sustaining a head wound. The findings include: 1. On 09/23/24 at 10:54 AM, R114 was sitting in his wheelchair, in the activity room by nurses station. R114 was unable to answer any questions. The facility's Reporting to IDPH worksheet dated 6/25/24 shows fall with injury-R114 was sent to hospital for evaluation and treatment of bruising to right groin. Notified that R114 had a femur fracture and would be admitted for treatment. On 09/25/24 at 10:02 AM, V1 Administrator said V17 CNA came and told V2 Director of Nursing that something was wrong with R114, he was not walking right. V1 said upon assessment, R114 had some discoloration in his right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a nurse reported a potential injury promptly to another nurse or physician. This applies to 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 10. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing a delay in care/assessment and experiencing increased pain. The findings include: On 2/20/2024 at 10:56AM, V5 Registered Nurse (RN) said on 1/27/2024 she could see [R1's] right foot stuck behind the front wheel of the wheelchair. V5 said [R1] did say oww while her foot was stuck behind the wheel. V5 said [R1] did complain of pain upon palpation of the leg. V5 said she did not see any swelling at that time. V5 said she moved [R1] down to the nurse's station she was working at to watch the patient. V5 said she was not the primary nurse for [R1] that day. V5 said she did not report the information to [R1's] primary nurse. V5 said she told V8 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) about the incident when (V8) came to get (R1) approximately 30 minutes after the incident occurred. V5 said she should have told [R1's] primary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility staff failed to safely transport a resident in a wheelchair for 1 of 3 (R1) residents in the sample of 10 reviewed for accidents/incidents. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing a femur fracture. The findings include: On 2/20/2024 at 11:12AM, V7 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) said on 1/27/2024 she was in a resident's room when she heard the door alarm going off. V7 said she left the residents room and saw [R1] trying to leave the facility out the back door. V7 said she approached [R1] to prevent her from going outside because it was cold and icy that day. V7 said [R1] became agitated and began hitting her. V7 said she was able to turn around [R1's] wheelchair and started pushing her down the hallway. V7 said there were no foot pedals on [R1's] chair because she self-propels down the hallway on her own using her feet. V7 said [R1] began trying to put her feet on the floor to stop the wheelchair from going and putting her feet behind the front wheel of the wheelchair. V7 said she tried to redirect [R1] from putting her feet down…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was not abused for one of seven residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of seven.The findings include:R1's admission Record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including suicidal ideation, dementia, Parkinson's disease, insomnia, generalized anxiety disorder, spinal fusion, chronic pain, alcohol abuse, and history of falling. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], shows that R1 is cognitively intact. R1's MDS also shows that that R1 does not have any behavioral symptoms. R1's Care plan-initiated October 1, 2025, shows, Caregivers to provide opportunity for positive interaction, attention. Resident has interactional problems with both staff and peers. When conflict arises, remove residents to a calm safe environment and allow to vent/share feelings.The facility's Final Investigation shows, On May 2, 2026, at 8:35 PM, the administrator received a phone call from the nurse stating that the alleged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their abuse policy was implemented for one of seven residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of seven.The findings include:R1's admission Record shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including suicidal ideation, dementia, Parkinson's disease, insomnia, generalized anxiety disorder, spinal fusion, chronic pain, alcohol abuse, and history of falling. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], shows that R1 is cognitively intact. R1's MDS also shows that that R1 does not have any behavioral symptoms. The facility's Final Investigation shows, On May 2, 2026, at 8:35 PM, the administrator received a phone call from the nurse stating that the alleged certified nursing assistant (CNA) [V7] yelled and pushed resident [R1]. After reviewing the interviews, it was determined that verbal and physical abuse had occurred. Police were called and report was made on May 2, 2026.On May 13, 2026, at 9:19 AM, V1 (Administrator/Abuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure R1 was provided care that enhanced the quality of life for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Resident Rights in the sample of 4.The findings include: On 02/17/2026 at 9:50AM, R1 was sitting in her room in an overstuffed reclining chair. On 02/17/2026 at 9:31AM, V1 Administrator said, R1 did not like the tone of voice V3 CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant used when providing care. R1 felt like it was condescending and reported it to me. V3 CNA received disciplinary action. V3 CNA's Disciplinary Warning Notice dated 01/14/2026 shows, Discourteous behaviors to resident.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document a residents fall and update a care plan post fall for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of seven.The findings include: R2's Progress Notes showed, 12/24/25 at 10:09 AM, catheter dislodged. New 16 French catheter inserted per physician order using aseptic technique. At 6:30 PM, R2 has catheter removed during her recent fall. At 9:43 PM, catheter removed during fall. R1's Progress Notes did not show the date, time, location or any additional information related to her fall.R2's Care Plan dated 12/15/25 showed R2 is at risk for falls related to hallucinations, antidepressant use, behaviors (resident intentionally slides herself out of wheelchair to the floor when she is up longer than she wants). The care plan was not reviewed and/or revised after her fall on 12/24/25.On 1/13/25 at 1:35 PM V4 Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN stated if a resident falls, they are assessed immediately. Neurological checks are done if it is an unwitnessed fall or a fall that they hit their head. V4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the sanitizing solution level was within range to sanitize food contact surfaces and failed to ensure expired bread was discarded. This applies to all residents residing at the facility.The findings include:On 8/25/25 at 9:30 AM, the sanitation solution in the bucket was checked for sanitation level. V3 (Dietary Manager) took a strip and checked the solution, after 10 seconds it registered as light orange. V3 then compared the strip quat color coded level- the light orange was 0 level. V3 placed the strip again in the sanitizing solution and this time V3 waited for approximate 20-30 seconds. The strip still registered as light orange which was still in the 0' level. V3 said the sanitizing solution should be in the 200's-400's which the strip should turn dark blue to be able to sanitize food prep areas to prevent foodborne illness. V3 also said the sanitizing solution was only good for 2 hours, it needed to be replaced now. At 12 PM, V5 Dietary Aide said she mixed the sanitizing solution at 6AM, it was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for 6 of 26 residents (R8, R46, R65, R11, R3 and R64) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 26.The findings include: 1. On 8/25/25 at 9:38 AM R8's room had no EBP signs on or near the entrance to his room and no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was located outside of his room. R8's admission Record dated 8/25/25 shows R8 has a diagnosis of gastrostomy status. R8's Order Summary Report dated 8/25/25 shows he receives enteral nutrition via a gastrostomy tube and a current order from 3/11/25 for EBP. 2. On 8/25/25 at 9:45 AM, R46's room had no EBP signs on or near the entrance to his room and no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was located outside of his room. R46 said he has had a (urinary) catheter for at least three months. R46's Order Summary Report dated 8/25/25 shows a current order for EBP from 1/3/25 and a current order from 3/18/25 to change his indwelling urinary catheter every month. 3. On 8/25/25 at 10:06 AM, R65's room had no EBP signs on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed accommodate a residents needs and preferences. This applies 1 of 26 residents (R30) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 26.The findings include:On 8/25/25 at 9:13 AM, during initial tour, R30 was observed in her wheelchair leaving the dining room. R30 said she's having problems with R121 (her roommate). R30 said R121 gets jealous when she has visitors and says inappropriate things to her. I don't have to put up with this and I don't want to go back to my room.On 8/25/25 at 11:25 AM, R30 was in the dining room for the noon meals. R30 said the facility talked about moving rooms, but I shouldn't have to move, she should. I like my room. R30 said she feels uncomfortable when R121 has behaviors toward her.On 8/25/25 at 1:35 PM, R121 was lying in her bed, crying. R30 (her roommate) was sitting next to her in her wheelchair, holding her hand trying to console her. V10 and V11 (Both Certified Nursing Assistant's) came into the room to transfer and provide care to R30. R121 was calling out for R30 Are you here, don't leave me,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a female resident was shaved and free of facial hair for 1 of 26 residents (R1) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) in the sample of 26.The findings include:On 8/25/25 at 10:26 AM, R1 was in the dining room drinking coffee. R1 had prominent whiskers covering her chin.On 8/26/25 at 10:40 AM, V16, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), said all residents gets a shower twice a week and they include shaving for men and women.On 8/26/25 at 1:40 PM, V19, CNA, said resident have a shower at least twice a week and shaving is included.On 8/27/25 at 10:32 AM, V1, Administrator said shaving takes place on shower days.R1's current care plan provided by the facility shows R1 has an ADL self-care performance deficit and has limited physical mobility. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R1 has severe cognitive impairment and requires substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene, including shaving.The facility's Grooming…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have pressure relieving interventions in place for residents at risk for pressure injuries for 2 of 6 residents (R5 and R30) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 26.The findings include:1. R5's Medication Review Report printed on 8/26/25 showed an order for an air mattress and it was to be on at all times. On 8/25/2025 at 2:06 PM, R5 was in bed. There was an air mattress pump hanging on the foot of R5's bed. The lights on the air mattress pump were off and the pump was unplugged. On 08/26/2025 at 1:42 PM, R5 was in bed. The air mattress pump on the foot of the bed remained with the lights off and unplugged. On 08/27/2025 at 9:01 AM, V13 Licensed Practical Nurse said an air mattress pump is a pressure relieving intervention. R5's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk with an effective date of 8/18/25 showed R5 was at risk for pressure injuries. R5's care plan with a revised date of 8/19/25 showed R5 had the potential for skin impairment. Listed under interventions was an air mattress. 2. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a catheter drainage bag was maintained below the level of the bladder for 1 of 4 residents (R11) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 26. The findings include:On 8/25/25 at 12:53 PM, R11 was in the dining room sitting in her wheelchair. R11's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag (leg bag) was attached to the top of her thigh in a position which did not allow for gravity to aid with drainage. The tubing was short and there was no slack in the tubing. On 8/26/25 at 1:40 PM, V19, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), said the urinary catheter drainage bag should be below the waist to prevent Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)/infections. R11's current care plan provided by the facility shows R11 has a history of frequent UTIs. R11 has an indwelling urinary catheter, and the drainage bag and tubing should be below the level of the bladder. R11 is at risk for developing an infection due to the presence of the indwelling catheter.The facility's Catheter Care Policy (undated) shows drainage bags should be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$18,974 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $18,974 — penalty dated 2024-09-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $958K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL