Randolph County Care Center
312 West Belmont, Sparta, IL 62286 · Government - County · 100 certified beds · (618) 443-4351 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0608, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $172,932 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-22)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 5.7% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 5.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.1% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.6% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 25.3% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.2% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.8% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.1% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.74 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.02 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.1–16.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.3–11.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.45 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 55.0 residents a day — about 55% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
21 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to supervise residents to prevent elopement for one of 9 residents (R2) reviewed for supervision to prevent elopements in the sample of 11. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy when on 4/11/25, R2, a resident with dementia, left without staff knowledge and was found 1 mile away from the facility. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 4/11/25 at 4:45 PM when the facility staff noticed the wander guard alarm was sounding at the front door. R2, with diagnosis with dementia and elopement risk, eloped from the facility and was found in a ditch along a busy road by a passerby at 5:22 PM per the police report. R2 admitted ly removed his (resident monitoring device) bracelet by filing it off with an emery board. R2 then left the facility by entering the front door code which is directly posted above the keypad on a red sign with bold white numbers. R2 continues to state he will attempt to leave the facility again. V1, Administrator, was notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's coffee was served at safe temperatures to prevent burns/injury. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy when R21 sustained a second degree burn from spilling hot coffee on himself on 2/8/2024 and the facility continued to provide all residents' coffee at unsafe temperatures. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy began on 2/8/2024 when R21 sustained a second degree burn from spilling hot coffee on himself. On 4/26/2024 at 1:50 PM, V1 (Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) and V3 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy. The surveyor confirmed by observations, record review and interview, that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 4/30/2024 but non-compliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of in-service training. 1. R21's Physicians Order Sheet (POS) dated April 2024, documented a diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-22 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure and implement an individualized plan of care for a resident experiencing psychosocial adjustment difficulty for one of one resident (R2) reviewed for psychosocial adjustment difficulties in the sample of 11. This failure resulted in harm as evidence by R2 expressing feelings of self-harm, displaying tearfulness, and wanting to leave the facility. Findings includes: R2's Face Sheet, print date of 04/16/25, documented R2 had diagnoses of depression and dementia. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 and required supervision/touching assistance with ambulation. He wears a wander/elopement alarm daily. Section D of the MDS documented under the symptom's presence R2 was having feelings of feeling down, depressed, or feeling hopeless. Under the symptoms frequency documented he was having these feelings 12-14 days (nearly every day).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement fall interventions for 1 of 4 residents (R33) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 25. This failure resulted in R33 suffering a fall resulting in a subdural hematoma requiring hospitalization for monitoring and treatment. Findings Include: R33's admission Record documents R33's original admission date to facility as 1/3/22. R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a BIMS score of 09, indicating cognitive impairment. This same MDS documents in Section G0110 that R33 requires limited assistance from 1-person physical assist for transfers, walking in room, and walking in corridor. R33's Morse Fall Scale dated 1/3/22 documents a score of 75, indicating R33 is at high risk for falls. R33's Plan of Care documents a focus area that states, The resident is high risk for falls r/t (related to) Confusion, Gait/balance problems, unaware of safety needs. An intervention listed for this focus area documents a date initiated as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide enough CNAS (Certified Nurse Assistants) to ensure residents receive assistance with care including toileting in a timely manner. These failures have the potential to affect all 53 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include:1.R1's admission Record, print date of 10/27/25, documented R1 has diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of female breast, neoplasm of brain, epilepsy, cerebral infarction, and dysphagia.R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 8/29/25, documented R1 is cognitively intact although at time of interview R1 was lethargic and confused. R1's Care Plan Report, undated, documented R1 has a terminal diagnosis related to metastatic breast cancer. This care plan also documented R1 is at risk for falls with interventions including low bed at all times, 15-minute checks to ensure proper bed positioning, and floor mat with an initiation date of 10/18/25. On 10/23/25 at 12:20 PM R1 was observed resting on a low bed, no mat was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to implement care plan fall interventions as documented for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for falls in the sample of 6. Findings Include:1.R1's admission Record, print date of 10/27/25, documented R1 has diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of female breast, neoplasm of brain, epilepsy, cerebral infarction, and dysphagia.R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 8/29/25, documented R1 is cognitively intact although at time of interview R1 was lethargic and confused. R1's Care Plan Report, undated, documented R1 has a terminal diagnosis related to metastatic breast cancer. This care plan also documented R1 is at risk for falls with interventions including low bed at all times, 15-minute checks to ensure proper bed positioning, and floor mat with an initiation date of 10/18/25. R1's Incident Report, date 10/18/25, documented CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) came to this nurse, resident's father was in her room and said resident climbed out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-22 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing was part of the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee. This failure has the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: The Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee attendance sheet dated 03/05/25 documented the last QAA meeting had in attendance V1, Administrator, V6, Medical Director, V40, Pharmacist, V41, Medical Records consultant, and V3, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). There was no Director of Nursing (DON) in attendance. On 04/29/2025 at 12:11 PM, V1, Administrator, stated the facility currently doesn't have a DON. The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, not dated, documented It is the policy of the facility to develop a QAPI plan in accordance with Federal Guidelines to describe how the facility will address clinical care, resident quality of life and residents' choice and is based on the scope and complexity of services defined by the Facility Assessment. It further documented 5. The Quality Assessment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-22 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse aides completed the required 12 hours of education per year. This has the potential to affect all 46 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 4/29/25 at 11:33 AM V1, Administrator, stated the facility provides education to the facility staff including Certified Nurse Assistants, CNAs, in person and the facility does not provide any online education. V1 stated she or any of the managers keep the in-service records with hours of education in one location and she will have to get the records from the department managers who did the in-services. On 4/29/25 at 11:53 AM V1 stated the facility did not provide any dementia care training for any of the CNAs in the past year, and the facility only has documentation for 3 in-services provided to CNAs in the last 12 months and those in-services were for sexual harassment, resident rights, abuse, and emergency preparedness. V1 stated the records do not have the amount of time each in-service lasted, just the dates the in-services were conducted. V1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the Power of Attorney (POA)/family of a resident who was experiencing self-harm thoughts for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for self-harm in a sample of 11. Findings Include: R2's Face Sheet, print date of 04/16/25, documented R2 had diagnoses of depression and dementia. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R2 is cognitively intact with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 and required supervision/touching assistance with ambulation. He wears a wander/elopement alarm daily. Section D of the MDS documented under the symptom's presence R2 was having feelings of feeling down, depressed, or feeling hopeless. Under the symptoms frequency documented he was having these feelings 12-14 days (nearly every day). R2's Care Plan, with admission date of 09/27/24, was reviewed and had no documentation regarding R2 having a diagnosis of depression. R2's Physician Notification for Routine Orders, dated 04/10/25, sent at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to provide supervision for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for sufficient staffing in a sample of 11. Findings include: The facility's daily assignment sheet, dated 4/11/25, documented 1 nurse, Agency Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) and 2 Certified Nurse Assistants, CNAs, (V12, V13) were assigned to the first floor of the facility from 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM and a CNA (V28) assigned as floater for the first and second floor from 3:30 PM to 10 PM. On 4/11/25 between 4 PM and 5 PM R2, with Alzheimer's dementia eloped from the facility and was found approximately a mile away from the facility in a ditch along a busy road. It was determined that on 4/11/25 only 1 CNA (V12) was present on the first floor of the facility at times between 4 PM and 5 PM due to a CNA (V13) being on her lunch break, nurse (V20) being on break outside of the facility, and V23 float CNA working on the 2nd floor. The facility's incident report of R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure abuse did not occur for 2 of 3 residents (R9 and R149) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 31. Findings include: 1.) R149 Physician Order Sheet for September 2023 documents, a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, pneumonia, arthropathies in other specified diseases, type 2 diabetes mellites with diabetic neuropathy, major depression, hypertension, acute ischemic heart disease, typical atrial flutter, peripheral vascular disease, asthma, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, respiratory failure unspecified with hypoxia, Gerd, heart failure. R149's Care Plan with a revision date of 1/25/2023 documents, The resident has a communication problem, related to minimal hearing deficit. Intervention: Allow adequate time to respond. Repeat as necessary, do not rush. Request clarification from the resident to ensure understanding. Face when speaking, make eye contact. Turn off TV/radio reduce environmental noise. R149's Minimum Data Set, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the Facility failed to ensure all abuse allegations were investigated thoroughly and completed for 1 of 4 residents (R149) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 31. Findings include: R149's Initial Investigation Report sent 9/18/2023 at 10:59 AM, documents, To whom it may concern: Resident's family member brought to my attention this morning a picture from 9/16/2023 of his white board with a handwritten message stating to Stop abusing the call light, last warning. MD (Medical Doctor) notified. DON (Director of Nursing) interviewed resident. He has no recollection of seeing the message. Investigation to continue. (Author V1- Administrator). On 4/25/2024 at 4:14 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated, I cannot find the final report for this investigation. I am not sure who the staff member was and/or what the outcome was regarding this allegation. (R149) is no longer in the facility. I have no interviews from other residents and or staff regarding this allegation. On 4/25/2024 at 4:22 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, I was not working here, that was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-02-09 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) at least 8 consecutive hours, 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect all 49 residents who reside at this facility. This past non-compliance occurred between 7/2/22 and 9/20/22. Findings include: On 2/7/2023 at 2:00 p.m., V2 (Director of Nursing/DON), stated that for the following dates in July 2022 (7/2, 7/3, 7/4, 7/10, 7/22, 7/26, & 7/30), August 2022 (8/5, 8/10, 8/17, & 8/20), and September 2022, (9/3, 9/4, 9/8, & 9/20) there was no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for those days. V2 provided handwritten documentation regarding the facility's nursing schedule for July, August and September 2022 to clarify the missing RN staffing hours. This documentation showed there were no RN coverage hours on the following dates: 7/02, 7/03, 7/04, 7/10, 7/22, 7/26, 7/30, 8/05, 8/10, 8/17, 8/20, 9/03, 9/04, 9/08 & 9/20/2022. A facility document titled Resident Census and Condition documented the facility had 49 residents on 2/06/2023. Prior to the survey date, the facility implemented the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide 8 hours of daily Registered Nurse coverage. This failure has the potential to affect all 43 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 2/17/22 at 10:20 am, V2 (Director of Nursing) acknowledges there are days that the facility does not have Registered Nurse (RN) coverage. V2 states that the facility has two Registered Nurses employed at the facility, V13 and V14 (Registered Nurse), but since the beginning of the year they have worked on the same weekend, which then leaves the opposite weekend with no RN coverage. V2 verifies the accuracy of nursing schedules provided and states the facility does not have any nursing waivers. Review of the Nursing Schedules from 2/1/22- 3/28/21 documents no RN coverage was provided at the facility on 2/1/22, 2/5/22, 2/6/22, and 2/15/22. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents Form (CMS-672) dated 2/15/22 there are 43 residents living in the facility.
Show the remaining 7 citations
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review failed to accommodate residents' food preferences for 8 of 12 residents (R14, R22, R23, R24, R25, R27, R28, and R43) reviewed for preferences in a sample of 25. The Findings Include: 1. On 2/17/22 at 1:10 pm, R25 and R28 were seated in the dining room with their lunch plate still on the table. Both resides were alert to person, place and time R28 stated that R28 asked for sliced onion for R28's ham today and V8 (Dietary Aide) told him They were fresh out. R28 went on to state that R28 never gets what R28 asks for during the meals. R28 stated that today at lunch R28 also asked for some juice for the ham and the black-eyed peas but no one would give R28 any. R25 and R28 further stated that they do not know what they have to offer other than what is served. If the staff remember to write the menu on the board, they cannot see the board that far away and no one tells them what the substitute is. R25 and R28 went on to state that the staff do not listen to them when they ask for food items on the menu, so they do not bother to ask for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to operationalize its Abuse Policy by thoroughly investigating an incident of resident-to-resident sexual abuse and reporting the incident to law enforcement as stated in the policy for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R24) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 25. Findings include: A correspondence titled, Report to IDPH (the Illinois Department of Public Health) authored by V1 (Administrator) dated 12/31/21 stated, On 12/30/21 at approximately 13:16(1:16pm), V12 (Housekeeping Supervisor) witnessed and reported (R3) rubbing (R24) breast. The residents were separated with (R3) being redirected. No injury (to R24) was noted. (Both resident's) [NAME] of Attorney and Medical Doctors were notified. (When interviewed about the incident), (R3) stated he was patting him down. No further incidents were noted. (V12) was interviewed and she stated (R3 and R24) were in the hall and (R3 ) was patting (R24 ) breasts with both hands. (R24) clothing was in place. (R3) was (previously) an employee at (a mental health facility) for many years, (and)has a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0608 — failed to report suspected crimes — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to ensure (1) employees report any suspicion of a crime against any resident, according to timelines; (2) post the notice of employee rights; and (3) prohibit and prevent retaliation for reporting.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an incident of resident-to-resident sexual abuse to local law enforcement for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R24) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 25. Findings include: A correspondence titled, Report to IDPH (the Illinois Department of Public Health) authored by V1 (Administrator) dated 12/31/21 stated, On 12/30/21 at approximately 13:16(1:16pm), (V12 Housekeeping Supervisor) witnessed and reported (R3) rubbing (R24) breast. The residents were separated with R3 being redirected. No injury (to R24) was noted. (Both resident's) [NAME] of Attorney and Medical Doctors were notified. (When interviewed about the incident), (R3) stated he was patting him down. No further incidents were noted. (V12) was interviewed and she stated (R3 and R24) were in the hall and (R3 ) was patting (R24 ) breasts with both hands. (R24) clothing was in place. (R3) was (previously) an employee at (a mental health facility) for many years, (and)has a diagnosis of dementia, with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status Score) of 5 (indicating severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident of resident-to-resident sexual abuse for 2 of 2 residents (R3, R24) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 25. Findings include: A correspondence titled, Report to IDPH (the Illinois Department of Public Health) authored by V1, Administrator, dated 12/31/21 stated, On 12/30/21 at approximately 13:16(1:16pm), (V12, Housekeeping Supervisor) witnessed and reported (R3) rubbing (R24) breast. The residents were separated with R3 being redirected. No injury (to R24) was noted. (Both residents) [NAME] of Attorney and Medical Doctors were notified. (When interviewed about the incident), (R3) stated he was patting him down. No further incidents were noted. (V12) was interviewed and she stated (R3 and R24) were in the hall and (R3 ) was patting (R24 ) breasts with both hands. (R24) clothing was in place. (R3) was (previously) an employee at (a mental health facility) for many years, (and)has a diagnosis of dementia, with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status Score) of 5 (indicating severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident and/or resident's representatives in writing of hospital transfers for 3 of 3 residents (R1, R3, R33) reviewed for hospitalizations in a sample of 25. Findings Include: 1. Review of R33's admission Record documents R33's original admission date to the facility as 1/3/22. This same document lists V10 (Resident Representative) as R33's responsible party. On 2/15/22 at 10:36 pm, R33 was alert to person only. Review of R33's Clinical Record documents an entry on 1/17/22 at 5:45 pm which states R33 was found lying on the floor on R33's back. R33 knows R33's name but unable to explain how R33 got on the floor. Neurological flow sheet started due to 3.0 cc (cubic centimeter) hematoma on left, upper, back of head. Blood pressure and pulse elevated. Order received to send to local hospital for evaluation and treatment. Review of R33's Clinical Record documents after being evaluated at the local hospital, R33 was transferred to an out-of-town…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's Bed Hold policy to a resident and/or resident's representative at the time of a resident transfer to the hospital for 3 of 3 (R1, R3, R33) residents reviewed for hospitalization in the sample of 25. Findings Include: 1. Review of R33's admission Record documents her original admission date to the facility as 1/3/22. This same document lists V10 (Resident Representative) as R33's responsible party. On 2/15/22 at 10:36 am, R33 is alert to person only. Review of R33's Clinical Record documents an entry on 1/17/22 at 5:45 pm which states R33 was found lying on the floor on R33's back. R33 knows R33's name but unable to explain how R33 got on the floor. Neurological flow sheet started due to 3.0 cc (cubic centimeter) hematoma on left, upper, back of head. Blood pressure and pulse elevated. Order received to send to local hospital for evaluation and treatment. Review of R33's Clinical Record documents after being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a Plan of Care encompassing Dementia Care Services for 2 of 12 residents (R3, R33) reviewed for Care Planning in the sample of 25. Findings include: On 2/15/22 at 10:26 am, R3 was observed in R3's room, sitting in the wheelchair. R3 was alert but oriented only to self, at times giving nonsensical responses to the surveyor's questions. A correspondence titled, Report to IDPH (the Illinois Department of Public Health) authored by V1 (Administrator) dated 12/31/21 stated, On 12/30/21 at approximately 13:16(1:16 pm), (V12 Housekeeping Supervisor) witnessed and reported (R3) rubbing (R24) breast. The residents were separated with R3 being redirected. No injury (to R24) was noted. [NAME] of Attorney and Medical Doctors were notified. (R3) stated he was patting him down. No further incidents were noted. (V12) was interviewed and she stated (R3 and R24) were in the hall and (R3) was patting (R24) breasts with both hands. (R24) clothing was in place. (R3) was (previously) an employee at (a mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$172,932 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $96,272 — penalty dated 2025-04-22
- $76,660 — penalty dated 2024-04-30
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-26 for 41 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RANDOLPH COUNTY | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/1966 |
| CATO, MICHELLE | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/17/2016 |
| COULTER, RUSSELL | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/1999 |
| HOLDER, DAVID | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| KIEHNA, MARC | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/01/2014 |
| WHITE, RONALD | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 12/01/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145406. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.