La Bella of Sterling
3601 Sixteenth Avenue, Sterling, IL 61081 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (815) 626-0233 Medicaid only — no Medicare
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (20) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 28.8% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 6.3% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.2% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.3% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 52.8% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.9% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.8% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.6% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 100.0% | 21.7% | 17.1% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 39.4 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.48 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.56 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.58 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision to a resident (R1) while attending an outdoor activity. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining second degree burns from an outdoor fire.The findings include:R1's electronic face sheet printed on 10/3/25 showed R1 has diagnoses including but not limited to major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, and tremor.R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has no cognitive impairment.R1's nursing progress notes dated 9/23/25 showed, During afternoon activities today resident was attending an activity and was roasting marshmallows with her peers and staff. Each staff member had assigned areas to supervise and assist with for the activity. Dietary and business office manager assigned to area with marshmallows and candy. Dietary manager assisted and supervised residents with covered fire pit for entirety of activity. Dietary manager completed assistance with (R1) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was discharged in a safe manner and failed to ensure outside resources and durable medical equipment were in place prior to discharge for one of two residents (R1) reviewed for discharge in the sample of three. The findings include:R1's hospital records shows she was admitted to a psychiatric hospital on April 3, 2025, for acute stabilization and was experiencing acute psychosis and was a danger to herself prior to being admitted to the facility on [DATE].R1's Transfer Discharge Report dated June 11, 2026, shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, diabetes mellitus type 2, unspecified psychosis, mild intermittent asthma, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. R1's Face Sheet shows she was discharged from the facility on May 4, 2026.R1's Care Plan dated May 12, 2026, shows, [R1] can have short term memory issues at times in the evenings. She may return…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain comfortable temperatures in the facility. This failure has the potential to effect all 41 residents residing in the facility.The findings include: The facility provided resident roster shows there were 41 residents residing in the facility on 12/15/2025. On 12/15/25 at 9:28 AM, during initial tour of the building the west hallway, group and activity (TV) room in the west wing, and the nursing station outside of the west hallway were felt to be very cold.On 12/15/25 at 9:48 AM, The main dining area of the facility felt cold, and the back half of it felt even colder. R2 and R4 were sitting in the dining room finishing breakfast and said some areas of the building are cold, including the shower rooms, the dining room and other rooms. On 12/15/25 at 10:26 AM, V3 (Maintenance) said the building is very old and needs new windows. V3 said the building has electric floor heating in certain areas, and in some resident rooms in the west wing, there are electric heat vents in the wall. V3 said it is difficult to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's activity program was directed by a qualified professional. This failure has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The facility's Resident Census and Condition form dated March 10, 2025 shows the facility census was 43. On March 11, 2025 at 12:25 PM, V5 Activity Director/Social Services/CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant said she has been the facility's Activity Director for about two months. V5 said she works every other weekend. V5 said when she's not working, then the residents have activity packets to work on which include crosswords, sudoku puzzles, and coloring pages. On March 11, 2025 at 3:30 PM, V1 (Regional Director of Operations) said that V5 does not have any activity director certifications.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher sanitation solution was checked at the recommended level prior to use. This applies to all 43 residents in the facility. The findings include: The CMS 671: Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 3/10/25 shows the facility census as 43 residents. On 3/11/25 at 8:31 AM V7 (Cook) was asked to check the sanitation level in the dishwasher. V7 found Quaternary Ammonia test strips in the drawer and handed them to V8 (Dietary Aide). V8 then put the strip into the water reservoir on the dishwasher. The strip turned yellow. V7 then noticed that the sanitizing solution bucket was almost empty and proceeded to change it to a full bucket. V7 then used the same strips again and tested the water in the same reservoir of the dishwasher. The strip was even lighter yellow. Surveyor looked at the bucket on sanitizing solution. It read, Hypochlorite. V8 then noticed there was another roll of testing strips on the floor, under the dishwasher. (The strips, the plastic container and the key (chart) were all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide behavioral health care services for residents with diagnoses of mental illness. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R32, R41, R26, R22) reviewed for behavioral services in the sample of 12. The findings include: 1. R32's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms, PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder), generalized anxiety, and insomnia. R32's PASRR II (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) dated 6/16/24 shows he has a diagnosis of schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and PTSD. R32 has a hard time interacting with others, has unclear thoughts, gets easily upset, has feelings of worthlessness, hopelessness, trouble sleeping, sees and hears things, has nightmares R32 needs help to coordinate his care, needs encouragement and support to remain active and engaged in treatment, requires monitoring from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medically related social services were provided for 4 of 4 residents (R32, R41, R142, R26) reviewed for social services in the sample of 12. The findings include: 1. R32's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psychotic symptoms, PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder), generalized anxiety, and insomnia. On 3/10/25 at 9:56 AM, R32 was observed in his room playing video games. He said he has been at the facility for seven months of complete boredom. He came to the facility because he was told there would be a counselor on site, he was lied to on what this place was. He said he goes out for counseling services every two weeks but that's not enough. He said it would help if they had services in the facility, life skills offered and someone to talk to. On 3/12/25 at 1:50 PM, R32 was observed walking up and down the hall. He…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the pneumonia vaccine was consented or declined prior to administration. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R34, R35, R12 and R39) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 12. The findings include: On 3/11/25 R35 and R34's EMRs (Electronic Medical Records) show that R35 received the PCV 20 vaccine on 12/21/23. No consents were found in R35 and R34's EMR. On 3/11/25 R12 and R39's EMRs show that R12 and R39 both declined the Pneumonia vaccine. No declinations were found in R12 and R39's EMR. On 3/12/25 V1 (Corporate Regional Director of Operations) confirmed that the facility did not have the pneumonia consents or declinations for these 4 residents. The facility policy entitled Pneumococcal Vaccine dated 10/2023 states, The resident/representative retains the right to refuse the immunization. The facility will document in the clinical record the reason for refusal or the medical contraindications of the immunization. and A consent form shall be signed prior to the administration of the immunization and filed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a residents room was maintained in a comfortable homelike environment. This applies to 1 of 12 residents (R33) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 12. The findings include: On 3/11/25 at 8:45 AM, R33 was observed in her room lying in her bed. A section of the baseboard wall on the left lower side next to the bathroom door was missing approximately one foot fully exposed open hole. On the right lower side next to the bathroom door another section of the wall was missing approximately six inches with wood exposed and several ants observed around the area. R33 said she has notified the staff, but nothing has been done to repair the wall and ants are present year round. On 3/11/25 at 1:41 PM, V10 (Maintenance Supervisor) said the facility has been neglected over the years and it's catching up with lots of repairs needed. He is aware of the R33's room wall near the bathroom needing repair it has been like that for some time, but he is the only maintenance staff and has not had time to repair her wall. The facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities that meet residents physical, mental, and psychosocial well being were provided for two of 12 residents (R22, R26) in the sample of 12. The findings include: 1. R22's admission Record shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, psychotic features, obesity, alcohol abuse, major depressive disorder, and insomnia. R22's Care Plan written February 28, 2019 shows R22 independently structures his daily activities as evidenced by pursuing independent leisure activities daily and/or attending activities/groups of choice. Remind R22 of all activities available that are of his interest, R22 likes to go on dine outs with staff, donuts and coffee, offer one on one visits/activities as R22 will accept. R22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows he is cognitively intact. R22's MDS shows it is somewhat important to have books, newspapers, and magazines to read and participate in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement, develop, and provide resident centered mental health services for a resident with a diagnosis including PTSD (Post- Traumatic Stress Disorder). This applies to 1 resident (R142) reviewed for behavioral health in the sample of 12. The findings include: R142's face sheet shows R142 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, PTSD-chronic, borderline personality disorder and suicidal ideations. R142's PASRR II (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) dated 1/30/25 shows the facility should provide R142 with rehabilitate services for systemic plans which are designed to change inappropriate behaviors, provision of a structured environment to keep yourself safe and other safe, programs to teach daily living skills to help promote independence, individual, groups and family psychotherapy to decrease mental health symptoms, development…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 9 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered and failed to ensure controlled medications were accounted for and reconciled. This applies to 3 of 4 residents (R41, R21, R22) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 12. The findings include: 1. On 3/10/25 at 10:15 AM, R41 said on Saturday (3/9/25) he missed the evening medication pass because he was watching TV and was not paying attention to the time. About 12:30 AM, he went to the nurses station for his medications. The nurse said he was late and refused to give me my medications. She said I missed the window. He takes medication for his heart and was upset she refused to give my medications. No staff came to remind me about the time for his medications. On 3/10/25 at 11:17 AM, V2 (DON/Director of Nurses) said R41 did report to me yesterday he did not receive his evening medications on 3/9/25. If the resident does not show up to take their medications she would expect the staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address pharmacy recommendations for three of five residents (R18, R35, R33) reviewed for medication regimen review in the sample of 12. The findings include: 1. R18's admission Record dated March 12, 2025 shows R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, convulsions, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and insomnia. R18's Pharmacy Recommendations report dated February 12, 2025 shows, [R18] has orders for labs, but at the time of this review, they were not available in the medical record. The missing lab values include: CBC (Complete Blood Count), BMP (Basic Metabolic Profile), hepatic panel, GGT (Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase), ammonia, and A1C (Glycated Hemoglobin) every three months. Recommendation: Unless otherwise indicated, please ensure that ordered labs are obtained. Please disregard recommendation if these labs have been recently obtained. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to address a gradual dose reduction and failed to ensure an as needed anti-anxiety medication had a stop date for two of five residents (R18, R33) reviewed for gradual dose reductions in the sample of five. The findings include: 1. R18's admission Record dated March 12, 2025 shows R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, convulsions, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and insomnia. R18's Consultation Report dated January 9, 2025 shows, [R18] has received buspirone 10 MG (milligrams) three times daily since February 27, 2025. Please attempt a gradual dose reduction of buspirone to 10 MG twice daily. This report was not addressed by the physician. On March 12, 2025 at 10:09 AM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) said the DON and the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator are the staff members responsible for ensuring the gradual dose reductions are addressed. V2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure it was free from significant medication errors for one of one residents (R1) reviewed for medications in the sample of one. The findings include: R1's admission Record shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including alcohol abuse with alcohol induced psychotic disorder with delusions, visual hallucinations, depression, acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity, hypertension, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, abnormal weight loss, suicidal ideations, anxiety disorder, and epilepsy. R1's Order Summary Report shows an order for apixaban oral tablet 5 mg (milligram) give one tablet by mouth two times a day related to acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity to start on November 4, 2024. R1's Progress Notes show that R1's apixaban was on order on November 4, 2024 in the evening, November 5, 2024 in the morning and evening, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-09 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure RN (Registered Nurse) staffing data was accurately entered in the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) system. This applies to all 42 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS #671) dated 5/7/24 documents there are 42 residents residing in the facility. On 05/07/24 at 10:10 AM, V1 (Administrator) said, she is not sure what the problem with reporting is. V1 said, the issue may be that the corporate office, who is responsible for submitting the PBJ data, pulls punch codes from the time clock, but outside agency staff does not punch the time clock so those hours are not submitted. V1 said, it might also be how the time clock codes the nurses when they punch in. On 05/08/24 at 12:10 PM, V1 said, V17 (from the corporate office) is the person responsible for reporting the PBJ, V1 said, V17 only works the weekends and only does reporting. V1 said, she does not have a phone number for V17, but did provide V17's email address. On 05/08/24 at 12:44…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with manufacturer's directions; failed to monitor residents during medication administration; and failed to provide ordered medications. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R21 & R26) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 13. The findings include: 1. R21's admission Record (Face Sheet) showed an admission date of 1/14/22 with diagnoses to include high triglycerides (a specific type of fat found in the blood); bipolar; and schizoaffective disorder. R21's Order Summary Report (Physician Orders, as of 5/7/24) showed an order for Icosapent Ethyl (medication to treat high triglycerides and reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease) to be given twice daily. The order showed it was started on 8/31/23 and the order was active. On 5/7/23 at 8:20 AM, V4 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered R21's morning medications. V4 failed to provide R21 his Icosapent Ethyl. V4 stated the medication was not available and it was also not available on her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — widespreadEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety by utilizing portable space heaters in hallways and not monitoring air temperatures. This failure affects all 43 facility residents. The findings include: The 1/15/24 facility data sheet showed 43 residents in the facility. On 1/15/24 at 7:13 AM, there were space heaters on the floor in the north hall outside room [ROOM NUMBER], 4, 6, and 14. The space heaters outside rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were plugged into outlets inside the room and the cord was on the floor. The space heater outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was plugged into a power strip which was plugged into an outlet in the hallway ceiling. The cord rested on the hallway floor. The space heaters on the floor in the south hall (outside rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]) were plugged into an outlet inside the rooms as the heater and cord were on the floor outside the rooms. A portable space heater outside room [ROOM NUMBER] was plugged into a power strip which was plugged into an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to reconcile controlled medications and failed to ensure controlled medications were administered immediately after preparation for 3 of 3 residents (R16, R27, R35) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 12 and 2 residents (R8, R1) outside the sample. The findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 09:23 AM, a locked cabinet in the medication room had a medicine inventory bag labeled with R35's name. This label showed the bag contains a bottle of Norco (schedule II drug) - quantity 6 and Ativan (schedule IV drug) - quantity 6. There was no dosage for the medications on the bag label. This surveyor requested a reconciliation form for the Norco and Ativan. V3 (Registered Nurse/RN) was unable to provide a reconciliation form for R35's stored controlled medications. On [DATE] at 9:23 AM, V3 she did not count R35's Norco and Ativan at shift change and wasn't aware they were in the cabinet. V3 said she would leave them on the counter to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to remove resident medications from storage and failed to destroy medications prepared and not administered for 2 of 2 residents (R15, R29) reviewed for medication storage in the sample of 12 and three residents (R20, R39, and R41) outside the sample. The findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 8:58 AM, during the medication storage task, in the bottom drawer of the A-K medication cart there were two large clear plastic storage bags with pill bottles in them. The pill bottles were labeled as belonging to R15. There was a total of 20 pill bottles. On [DATE] at 9:00 AM, V3 (Registered Nurse/RN) said R15, R41, R29 and R20's medications found stored in the medication room were probably brought in when the resident was admitted . V3 did not know who was responsible for overseeing the facility's medication storage. On [DATE] at 10:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) said resident medications should not be stored in the facility more than 7 days according to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in IL
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 14E579. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.