Arcadia Care Watseka
715 East Raymond Road, Watseka, IL 60970 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 123 certified beds · (815) 432-5476 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0570)
- it has 9 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $421,200 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-26)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2025-04, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2025-04 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.5% | 13.4% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 10.1% | 6.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 86.2% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.7% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.3% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.6% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.9% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 36.9% | 21.7% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 9.4% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.0% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.44 | 2.02 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 5.47 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 18% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 6.6–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.79 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 123 beds and averages 60.7 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.28 to 0.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
74 citations, most serious first. The 19 most serious are shown; the remaining 55 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse and verbal abuse for three (R26, R24, R61) of four residents reviewed for abuse in a sample list of 35. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting Policy dated September 2024 documents the facility affirms the right of the residents to be free from abuse. Physical Abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other then by accidental means. Examples of physical abuse include hitting, slapping, and kicking. Verbal abuse may be considered a type of mental abuse and includes the use of oral communication to residents within hearing distance. Examples include harassing a resident, mocking, insulting, yelling at, and threatening residents. A resident to resident altercation should be reviewed as a potential situation of abuse. This policy also documents employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential abuse to the administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to use proper equipment to transport a resident (R1) resulting in R1 sustaining an impacted tibia fracture and associated proximal fibula fracture. The facility also failed to follow its incident/accident policy by failing to report a serious injury to the state survey agency and thoroughly investigate an injury to determine the root cause and develop interventions for one (R1) of three residents reviewed for accidents in the sample list of seven. Findings include: On 12/3/24 at 1:56 PM R1 stated on 10/20/24 R1 had a left leg tibia/fibula fracture caused while V9 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was pushing R1 in a shower chair down the hallway, R1 started to slip and attempted to push herself back up and R1's left toe/foot caught on the rug in the hallway. R1 screamed ow and thought it was broken. R1 stated x-rays were not taken for two to three days. R1 stated R1 was seen by V15 Orthopedic Physician on 11/6/24, who told R1 that R1's leg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's (R2) right to be free from sexual abuse by another resident (R1). This failure resulted in R2, who is cognitively impaired, as a reasonable person that would not expect to be sexually abused in their own home or health care facility, causing them to feel fear, anxiety, and anger.The facility also failed to protect a resident's (R4) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R3) and protect a resident's (R6) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R4). These failures affected 5 (R1, R2, R3, R4, and R6) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse in a sample list of 14. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents the facility's residents have the right to be free from abuse and dementia management is listed as one of the measures implemented to prevent abuse. This policy documents abuse is the willful infliction, a deliberate act, of injury, unreasonable confinement,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement safety measures, failed to provide adequate supervision and toileting assistance to prevent falls (R2, R5); and failed to develop and implement fall interventions and thoroughly complete fall investigations (R1, R2, R5). These failures affected 3 (R1, R2, and R5) of 3 residents reviewed for falls in the sample list of 14. These failures resulted in R2 and R5 sustaining falls with lacerations that required emergency room treatment of medical glue closure. Findings include: The facility's Fall Prevention policy dated 11/10/18 documents all staff must observe residents for safety and if residents who are high risk for falls are observed up assistance must be summoned/provided. This policy documents to conduct a fall huddle after the fall with the staff on duty to identify details of the event and appropriate interventions, and the nurse will document the circumstances of the fall and the new interventions. Falls will be reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R1) was free from misappropriation of funds by an employee (V3 (Business Office Manager/BOM). This failure resulted in psychosocial harm for R1. R1 is one of four residents reviewed for misappropriation of property in the sample list of six. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents abuse includes misappropriation of resident property and exploitation, which includes unauthorized use of a resident's belongings or money. The facility's undated Resident Funds Policy and Procedure documents The facility will institute security measures to insure that resident funds managed by the facility are safeguarded from theft or mismanagement and shall include: signed vouchers for all resident transactions, computerized tracking of account activity, monthly oversight by the facility Administrator, and signed quarterly statements. The facility's Fax (Electronic Facsimile) Worksheet IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Notification Form dated 9/13/24 documents on 9/13/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide dialysis services to one (R15) of two residents reviewed for dialysis services from a total sample list of 36. This failure resulted in R15 being hospitalized for Hypervolemia. Findings include: On 8/27/24 at 1:10PM, R15 stated, I missed nearly two and a half months of dialysis because V11 Social Services Director didn't understand that I needed dialysis and didn't get a nurse involved. I ended up in the hospital really sick. I was doing dialysis three times a week before I came here. R15's undated census report documents that R15 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R15's undated diagnosis sheet documents that R15 was admitted with a diagnosis of kidney failure. R15's admission record dated 12/18/23 documents that R15 was admitted to the facility with a renal shunt for dialysis. R15's medical record documents that R15 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for Hypervolemia. R15's hospital discharge notes dated 2/6/24 document that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by another resident. This failure affected three of five residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of nine. R1 pushed R2 who sustained skin tears to both elbows. R1 shoved R3 who fell into the wall, hit her head/back against the wall, then fell to the ground. R3 complained of back pain and was sent to the emergency room. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents the facility affirms the right of it's residents to be free from abuse or mistreatment. Physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means. Physical abuse can include such things as hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. The Abuse Investigation Summary dated 4/24/24 documents on 4/24/24 at 6:15 PM R1 and R2 were involved in an incident of physical aggression. R1 and R2 were ambulating in the hallway. R1 stopped walking and as R2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to adequately supervise and maintain a safe environment for residents, thoroughly investigate a fall, and failed to include a focus area, goal and interventions for a resident. These failures affect three residents (R2, R4, R6) out of three residents reviewed for falls in a sample list of nine residents. R6 sustained a dislocated Right Fourth finger and Left Foot Contusion as a result of an unwitnessed fall when the resident was found with dresser on top of him. Findings Include: 1. R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents R6's medical diagnoses as Dislocated Right Fourth Finger, Contusion to Left Foot, Moderate Dementia with Agitation, Delusional Disorder, Dysthymic Disorder and history of Embolism and Thrombosis of Deep Veins of Left Lower Extremity. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R6 was severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R6 requires supervision with toileting, dressing, personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a resident's fall risk by inaccurately completing the admission fall risk assessment, develop an at risk for falls care plan and implement fall prevention interventions, provide appropriate supervision and assistance to prevent falls, investigate falls and implement appropriate post fall interventions for two of three residents (R1, R2) reviewed for falls on the sample list of three. This failure resulted in a newly admitted resident (R2) not being identified as a fall risk therefore not having any fall prevention interventions implemented. R2 experienced daily falls, including a fall on 1/26/24 in which R2 sustained a facial laceration requiring closure with adhesive glue and strips at the Emergency Room. Findings Include: 1. On 2/6/24 at 9:20 am, R2 was walking down hallway on the Dementia Unit, bent forward and leaning to the right, while holding onto the hand rail. R2 was repeatedly asking for help stating, I need help, I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain resident equipment in a safe operable condition, failed to replace/repair equipment in disrepair after resident fall with injury and failed to implement new interventions post fall and an accident. These failures affected two of three residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for resident injury/injury of unknown origin on the sample list of seven.Findings include:1.) R2's current diagnoses sheet documents the following: Hemiplegia, Unspecified, Affecting Left Nondominant Side; Cerebral Infarction Due to Embolism of Right Vertebral Artery; and Generalized Muscle Weakness.R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents the following: R2's Brief Interview of Mental Status score was 15 out of a possible 15, indicating R2 has no cognitive impairment. The same MDS documents R2 is dependent on staff to roll left and right, defined as the ability to roll from lying on the back to the left and right side and return to lying on the back in bed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse when (R1) struck (R2). This failure resulted in (R2) experiencing physical abuse and exposing other residents to potential harm. (R1) and (R2) are two residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of three residents.Findings include:The facility's reported incident report titled Preliminary 24-Hour Abuse Investigation Report dated 3/4/26 documents an allegation of resident-to-resident physical abuse involving R1 and R2. The facility's final investigation report dated 3/5/26 completed by V1 Administrator documents R2 was sitting at a table and sipping a drink when R1 approached R2. R1 tried to take R2's personal walker and R2 would not let R1 have walker so R1 slapped R2 on the back with an open hand. V3 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) nurse on duty immediately tried to separate the two residents. R2 was trying to hit R1 but accidentally hit V3 LPN in the mouth. While V3 was trying to keep R1 away from R2, R1 became…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) coverage of at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 62 residents within the facility.Findings Include: Facility Midnight Census dated 2/21/26 documents 62 residents in house. The Facility Assessment Tool dated 11/2025-11/2026 Appendix 3 documents staffing information for units per shift. The facility has two shifts, shift one is 6:00am to 6:00pm and shift two is 6:00pm to 6:00am. Shift one requires one Registered Nurse (RN), two Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and six Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). Shift two requires one RN, one LPN, and five CNAs. Daily Schedules dated 1/3/26, 1/4/26, 1/17/26, 1/18/26, 1/31/26, 2/1/26, 2/7/26, 2/8/26, 2/21/26, and 2/22/26 document no RN coverage for each 24-hour timeframe. On 2/24/26 at 2:40PM V2 Director of Nursing stated she is aware they have a shortage of Registered Nurses (RN) and often do not have an RN in the building on the weekends. V2 stated facility is actively hiring RNs.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified Director of Food and Nutrition Services and failed to employ a person-in-charge (PIC) with the required Food Protection Manager Certification. These failures have the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility.Findings include:1. On 2/24/2026 at 10:58AM, V7 (Dietary Manager) was actively supervising dietary operations in the facility kitchen. V7 reported being the full-time manager of the facility food service and reported not being a clinically qualified Certified Dietary Manager (also known as Certified Food Protection Professional) or having equivalent training. V7 denied meeting the State of Illinois standards to be a food service manager or dietary manager (required in states that have their own established standards to be a food service manager or dietary manager (483.60(a) (2)ii). V7 reported only completing a one-day course (Certified Food Protection Manager) on food service sanitation which did not include any instruction on clinical nutrition. V7 denied:-being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve diets as planned on the menu. These failures have the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility. Findings include:The facility Diet Spreadsheet (2/13/2026) documents residents receiving regular diets are to receive a dinner roll/margarine with their lunch meal on 2/22/2026. The same record documents residents who receive pureed diets are to receive a #20 scoop of pureed dinner roll/margarine and a #12 scoop of pureed peaches with their lunch meal on 2/22/2026.On 2/22/2026 at the lunch meal service, no dinner rolls/margarine and no pureed dinner rolls/margarine and no pureed peaches were present at the service line where kitchen staff were preparing resident lunch meals. No resident lunch meals on 2/22/2026 included a dinner roll/margarine or a pureed dinner roll/margarine or pureed peaches. On 2/22/2026 at 12:32PM, V9 (Dietary Aide) reported pureed peaches were not made or served at lunch for residents who received puree diets, and dinner roll/margarine were not prepared or served today for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively sanitize dishes, failed to follow manufacturer's instructions for safe disinfectant use, failed to utilize appropriate sanitation test equipment, failed to ensure an ice machine drain line was was properly plumbed to prevent the potential for cross-contamination of ice, and failed to maintain sanitary floor surface areas. These failures have the potential to affect all 62 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:1. On 2/22/2026 at 8:45AM, V8 (Cook) was operating the kitchen mechanical sanitizing dishwasher and reported being the Person in Charge for the shift. V8 retrieved chemical sanitizer test strips to test the sanitizer concentration in the dishwasher. The test strips did not detect any sanitizer was present in the operating dishwasher (a concentration of zero parts per million). V8 observed the test strip and stated I don't know anything about the dishwasher. V8 reported V8 would inform the dietary manager of the dishwasher sanitizer dispenser not dispensing sanitizer correctly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for residents with mental illness diagnoses during their residency at the facility. This failure affects two (R5, R23) of five residents reviewed for PASARR II completion in the sample list of 34. Findings include: 1. R5's Face Sheet dated 2/24/26 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R5's Electronic Medical Record documents R5 has the following medical diagnoses Psychotic Disorder and Mood Affective Disorder (9/17/24). R5's PASARR Level I dated 9/20/23 documents a Level II screening is not indicated because there is no evidence of a serious behavioral health condition/SMI/ID/RC (Serious Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability and/or Related Condition). If changes occur or new information refutes these findings, a new screen must be submitted. 2. R23s Face Sheet dated 2/24/26 documents R23 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R23's Electronic Medical Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments for one of one resident (R8) reviewed for pressure sores on a sample list of 34.Findings Include:The Facility Skin Condition Assessment & Monitoring - Pressure and Non-Pressure Policy with no revision date documents Pressure and other Ulcers (diabetic, arterial, venous) will be assessed and measured at least weekly by licensed nurse and documented in the resident's clinical record. Resident identified will have a weekly skin assessment by a licensed nurse and each resident will be observed for skin breakdown daily during care and on the assigned bath day by the Certified Nursing Assistant. Changes shall be promptly reported to the charge nurse who will perform the detailed assessment. The Wound Round assessment dated completed 2/19/26 by V4 Wound Nurse documents R8 has stage three pressure sores to the coccyx measuring 0.50 centimeters (cm) length, 0.50 cm width, and 0.10 cm depth, the left iliac crest measuring 3.00 cm length, 3.50 cm width and 0.10 cm depth and the right iliac crest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly clean, store, change, and label oxygen tubing, and a nebulizer mask according to facility policy for one of four residents (R66) reviewed for respiratory care on the sample list of 34. Findings Include:R66's admission Record dated 2/24/26 documents an admission date of 2/7/26 with medical diagnoses of Alcohol Abuse, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver without Ascites, Pan Lobular Emphysema, Spinal Stenosis, Cervical Region, Vitamin D Deficiency, Nicotine Dependence, Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode, Moderate, Developmental Disorder of Scholastic Skills, Other Nonspecific Abnormal Finding of Lung Field, Orthopnea, and Interstitial Pulmonary Disease.On 2/23/2026 at 2:31 PM R66 was moving down the hallway in the wheelchair. A portable oxygen tank with tubing was on the back of the wheelchair and was not being used by R66. R66…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders to complete laboratory tests for two of two (R14, R16) residents reviewed for Laboratory Services on a sample list of 34.Findings Include:R14's admission Record dated 2/24/26 documents an admission date of 5/27/25 with medical diagnoses of Cerebral Infarction, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction, Epilepsy, Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Hyperlipidemia, Nicotine Dependence, Cigarettes, Long Term (Current) Use Of Aspirin, Abnormalities Of Gait And Mobility, Unsteadiness On Feet, Difficulty In Walking, and Dysphagia.R14's Physician Order dated 2/5/26 documents an order to collect a Keppra (anti-epileptic drug) level.R14's Laboratory Results Report dated 2/6/26 documents no specimen collected for the Keppra level and nurse to order redraw.R14's Progress Notes dated 2/24/26 do not document physician notification of the missed Keppra level or that a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 55 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a residents (R1) right to be free from inappropriate touching and sexual comments by another resident (R2), for 1of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:The Facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting Policy dated 9/2024 documents: Guidelines: This facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff, or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. In order to do so, the facility has attempted to establish a resident-sensitive and resident-secure environment. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within its control to prevent the occurrence of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff, and mistreatment of residents. Definitions:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient Registered Nursing (RN) hours on nine of forty-four days reviewed for RN staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 61 residents in the facility. Findings include:The Facility Nursing Daily Schedule dated July 12,2025 through August 24, 2025, documents on 7/12/25, 7/13/25, 7/22/25, 7/23/25, 7/30/25, 8/6/25, 8/14/25, 8/20/25 and 8/24/25, the facility scheduled zero (0) hours of RN coverage for a 24-hour period. On 8/25/25 at 12:30pm, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) and V5 Regional Director of Operations confirmed the hours listed on the facility nursing daily schedule were correct and the facility failed to have RN coverage on 7/12/25, 7/13/25, 7/22/25, 7/23/25, 7/30/25, 8/6/25, 8/14/25, 8/20/25 and 8/24/25The Facility Resident Midnight Census dated 8/24/25 documents 61 residents reside in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the director of food services met the regulatory qualifications. The current Dietary manager was not a certified dietary manager, certified food service manager, or credentialed as required. This failure effects all 61 residents.Findings include:On 8/24/25, 8/25/25 and 8/26/25, V6 (Dietary Manager) was actively supervising dietary operations in the facility kitchen during resident meal preparations. V6 reported being the full-time manager of the facility food service and reported not being a clinically qualified Certified Dietary Manager or having the equivalent training. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report dated 8/24/25 documents 61 residents reside in the facility.Facility Assessment Tool documents: Facility Resources Needed to Provide Competent Support and Care for our resident Population Every Day and During Emergencies. Position Dietitian or other clinically qualified nutrition professional to serve as the director of food and nutrition services. 1 Full Time Food Service Manager.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-26 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for residents with mental illness diagnosis during their residency at the facility. This failure affects three (R4, R6, and R37) of five residents reviewed for PASARR II completion in the sample list of 29. 1. R4's Face Sheet dated 8/26/25 documents R4 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R4's Electronic Medical Record documents R4 had the following medical diagnoses Schizoaffective and Bi-polar (4/19/23). R4's PASARR Level I dated 5/12/22 documents a Level II screening is not indicated because there is no evidence of a serious behavioral health condition/SMI/ID/RC (Serious Mental Illness, Intellectual Disability and/or Related Condition). If changes occur or new information refutes these findings, a new screen must be submitted. 2. R37s Face Sheet dated 8/26/25 documents R6 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R37's Electronic Medical Record documents R37 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications according to physician's orders for one (R6) of three residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample list of 29. This failure resulted in five medication errors out of 25 opportunities, resulting in a 20% medication error rate.On 8/24/25 at 9:33am, V3 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administered the following medications to R6: Fluticasone-Salmeterol (Advair) Inhaler 100-50 micrograms (mcg) 1 puff, Loratadine 10 milligrams (mg), Famotidine 40mg, Folic Acid 800mcg, Furosemide 40mg, Gabapentin 300mg, Losartan Potassium 50mg, Oxybutynin ER 10mg, Psyllium Husk Powder 1 tablespoon in water, Sennosides-Docusate Sodium (Senna) 8.6-50mg, and Oxycodone 5mg.R6's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated 8/25/25 documents the following orders: Fluticasone-Salmeterol (Advair) Inhaler 100-50 micrograms (mcg) 1 puff inhaled to be given twice a day, Loratadine 10 milligrams (mg) daily, Famotidine 40mg daily, Folic Acid 1mg daily, Duloxetine 60mg daily, Furosemide 40mg twice a day, Gabapentin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reweigh a resident (R3) for a documented significant weight gain, failed to accurately document meal intakes and provide nutritional supplementation as ordered for a nutritionally high-risk resident (R61), and failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered for two (R3 and R61) of four residents reviewed for nutrition in the sample list of 29.1. R61's Face Sheet dated 8/26/25 documents R61 has a diagnosis of Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. R61's Dietary Note dated 7/14/25 documents R61 has significant weight lost noted times six months and continue to monitor weights and intakes. Further documents R61 is on multiple supplements including fortified ice cream daily and nutritional shake three times a day. R61's Care Plan (current) documents R61 is at nutritional risk with interventions including monitoring weights/meal intakes and providing supplements as ordered. Further documents to alert nurse/dietician if not consuming supplements on a routine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Registered Nurse (RN) providing services at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This failure has the potential to affect all 62 residents currently residing in facility. Findings Include: The Facility Assessment Tool for Arcadia Care of Watseka dated November 2024 through November 2025 documents staffing should include one registered nurse (RN), two licensed practical nurses (LPN), and six certified nursing assistants (CNA's) for the 6:00 AM thru 6:00 PM shift and one registered nurse (RN), one licensed practical nurse (LPN), and five certified nursing assistants (CNA's) for the 6:00 PM thru 6:00 AM shift. The facility's March 2025 Nursing Schedule documents no Registered Nurses coverage on the following dates 3/8, 3/9, 3/13, 3/14, 3/17, and 3/18/25. The facility's daily assignments document indicates no RN coverage over a 24 hour period for the dates of 3/8, 3/9, 3/13, 3/14, 3/17 and 3/18/25. On 3/24/25 at 1:20 PM, V7 Regional Registered Nurse and V2 Director of Nursing confirmed there are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ a clinically qualified Director of Food and Nutrition Services. This failure has the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility. Findings Include: On 3/22/25, 3/23/25 and 3/24/25 V3 Dietary Manager was actively supervising dietary operations in the facility kitchen. On 3/11/25 at 11:04 AM V3 Dietary Manager stated that V3 was hired a couple of weeks ago as Dietary Manager. V3 stated that V3 is not currently a Certified Dietary Manger. V3 stated at this time V3 fails to meet the State of Illinois standards to be a food service manager/dietary manager. On 3/22/25 at 2:02 PM V1 Administrator confirmed that V3 Dietary Manager does not currently have a valid Food Safety/Dietary Manager Certificate as required. The Facility Assessment (not dated) documents a full-time dietician or other clinically qualified nutrition professional to serve as the director of food and nutrition services is needed to provide competent support and care for the facility's resident population every day and during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon observation, interview and record review the facility failed to employ an Infection Prevention Nurse that physically works onsite in the facility at least part time. This failure has the potential to affect all 62 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Observations were made on 3/22/25, 3/23/25 and 3/24/25 between the hours of 8:30 AM and 4:00 PM. During these times, no certified Infection Preventionist nurse was in facility. On 3/24/25 at 2:00 PM, V7 Regional Registered Nurse stated the facility's Infection Preventionist is a Regional Infection Preventionist (V25) who works offsite. V7 stated V25 is responsible for all infection tracking and logs and that these are not kept/maintained in the facility. On 3/25/25 at 9:18 AM V2 Director Of Nursing (DON) stated she believes they are supposed to be tracking resident infections but that V25 Regional Infection Preventionist keeps track of resident infections. V2 stated she herself does not have access to the infection tracking log. On 3/25/25 at 9:32 AM V25 Regional Infection Preventionist stated she is at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility repeatedly failed to provide showers to residents according to their plans of care, physician orders, and preferences. This failure affects three residents (R17, R45, R61) out of five reviewed for activities of daily living on the sample list of 35. Findings Include: Facilities Bathing - Shower and Tub Bath Policy dated October 2024 documents: Purpose: To ensure resident's cleanliness to maintain proper hygiene and dignity. Guidelines: A shower, tub bath or bed/sponge bath will be offered according to resident's preference, no less than once per week or according to the resident's preferred frequency and as needed or requested. 1. On 3/22/25 at 10:20 AM, R45 was seated in a tilt back wheelchair in R45's room. R45 was unshaven and had long nails. R45 Medical diagnoses; Encounter for Palliative Care, Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation and Schizoaffective Disorder. R45's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R45's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide and implement activities to meet the interest and needs of the residents. This failure affects four residents (R8, R55, R57, R63) of thirteen residents reviewed for activities in the sample list of 35. Findings Include: All four residents (R8, R55, R57, R63) reside on the facility's locked memory care unit/hallway. On 3/22/25 at 9:45 AM, 10:00 AM, 2:00 PM and 3/23/25 at 9:40 AM, and 11:00 AM. all four residents (R8, R55, R57, R63) were in their rooms asleep or sitting not engaged, with no structured activities. 1. R8's undated diagnoses list includes: Unspecified Dementia, unspecified severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. R8's Care Plan (current), documents R8's preferences for activities are horticulture based activities or crafts, allow resident to choose preferred craft activity; assist with arranging community activities; and ensure the activities the residents is attending is compatible with physical and mental capabilities, compatible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse for one (R36) of four resident reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 35. Findings Include: On 3/23/25 at 11:39 AM V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated R36 told V2 last week that the agency nurse V13 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was very rough in her approach with him, her tone was harsh to him and that the nurse was talking about other residents to R36. V2 stated V2 did not tell V1 Administrator about it but stated she thought R36 told V1 himself. V2 stated she did not recognize R36's allegation as potential abuse at the time. V2 (DON) stated all potential abuse is supposed to be reported immediately to V1 Administrator. On 3/2/25 at 9:10 AM V1 Administrator stated R36 had not reported any abuse to V1 and no staff member reported any abuse regarding R36. V1 was not aware of R36's potential abuse allegation. The facility's Abuse Prevention and Reporting-Illinois Policy dated October 2022 documents employees are required to report any incident, allegation or suspicion of potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level II evaluation for two (R21, R62) of three residents reviewed for PASARR II completion in the sample list of 35. Findings Include: 1. R21's Medical Diagnoses List dated March 2025 documents R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder: Bipolar Type and Anxiety Disorder. R21's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I screening dated 10/9/23 documents a Level II screening is not indicated because there is no evidence of a serious behavioral health condition (Serious Mental Illness) however, if changes occur or new information refutes those findings a new screen must be submitted. On 3/23/25 at 9:25 AM V5 Business Office Manager confirmed the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I was completed for R21 on 10/9/23 before he was transferred to the facility. V5 confirmed R21's PASARR Level I screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate indwelling urinary catheter collection bag and failed to secure the bag in a safe and dignified manner for one of one resident (R63) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters on the sample list of 35. Findings Include: R63's undated diagnoses list documents R63's diagnoses as: Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage IV, Calculus of Ureter, and presence of Urogenital Implants. R63's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated March 2025, documents an order for 16 (french)Fr/10 (cubic centimeters)cc related to other Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy. On 03/22/25 at 9:30 AM, R63's catheter bag was attached to R63's pants visible to all. R63's catheter tubing is looped down through his pant leg, exiting at the bottom then looped back up and secured on the outside of R63's pants. On 3/22/25 at 9:40 AM, V9 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) stated there are no leg bags available but confirmed R63 should have a leg bag on for safety and dignity. On 3/22/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient Registered Nursing (RN) hours on six of fifteen days reviewed for RN staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 66 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility Nursing Daily Schedule (February 20, 2025 through March 6, 2025) documents on 2/22/25, 2/23/25, 2/27/25, 3/3/25, 3/4/25, and 3/5/25, the facility scheduled zero (0) hours of RN coverage for a 24 hour period. On 3/6/25 at 12:25pm, V3 Regional Director confirmed the hours listed on the facility nursing daily schedule were correct and the facility failed to have RN coverage on 2/22/25, 2/23/25, 2/27/25, 3/3/25, 3/4/25, and 3/5/25. The facility Resident Midnight Census dated 3/6/25 documents 66 residents reside in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents (R1) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R2) for one of five residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 10. Findings include: R1's Facility Census documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses: Sequelae of Cerebrovascular Disease, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Infarction Affecting Right Dominant Side, Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar type, Anxiety Disorder, Acute Kidney failure, Cerebral Infarction, muscle Weakness and Difficulty in Walking. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 11, moderate cognitive impairment. R1's Abuse and Neglect Screening assessment dated [DATE] documents R1 is a high risk for abuse. R1's Social Service Note dated 1/31/25 at 12:04pm documents Psychosocial assessment reviewed for R1. Assessment completed due to Verbal Altercation - R1 to R2. Behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan with intervention for behaviors. This failure affects one resident (R6) of four residents reviewed for behaviors in the sample list of ten. Findings include: R6's Facility Census documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has the following medical diagnoses: Dementia and Schizophrenia. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R6's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score 10, moderate cognitive impairment. R6's Nursing Note dated 1/4/25 at 3:49am documents R6 was restless during night shift and declined to go to sleep. R6 also refused help with personal cares from Certified Nursing Aides and R6 also refused to wear brief. R6's Nursing Note dated 1/15/25 at 5:57am documents R6 came out of R6's room around 2:00am, with no pants/underwear or (brief) on. R6 did have on a hat, coat, gloves and appropriate footwear. When writer told R6, R6 didn't have any pants, R6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide showers for four (R6, R7, R8 and R9) of four dependent residents reviewed for showers and failed to provide dental care for one (R9) of four residents reviewed for dental care from a total sample list of nine residents reviewed for dependent care. Findings include: The facility bathing policy dated October 2024 documents that a shower or bath will be offerred according to resident preference at a minimum of once per week. The facility morning and bedtime care policies dated October 2024 document that dental care will be provided both morning and night to promote comfort, cleanliness, and dignity. 1.) On 12/31/24 at 1:30PM, R6 was laying in bed with yellowed fingernails measuring over an inch past the nail, with particulates of unknown substances under them. R6 appeared disheveled and stale smelling. On 12/31/24 at 1:30PM, R6 stated, I haven't had a shower in a long time, I don't know how long, but its been more than a week. They…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a residents right (R3) to be free from Abuse by another resident (R1), for two (R1, R3) out of three residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of nine residents. Findings include: The facility policy titled 'Abuse Prevention and Reporting', reviewed 9/2024, documents this facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, deprivation of goods and services by staff or mistreatment. This facility therefore prohibits abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. The purpose of this policy is to assure that the facility is doing all that is within it's control to prevent occurrences of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, and mistreatment of residents. Abuse: Abuse means any physical or mental abuse injury or sexual assault inflicted upon a resident other than by accidental means. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to staff a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day. This failure has the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 12/3/24 at 11:54 AM V3 RN was working on the memory care unit of the facility. V3 stated this is V3's third day working for the facility. The facility's Daily Assignment Sheets dated 11/21/24-11/24/24, 11/27/24, 11/28/24, 11/30/24, and 12/1/24 do not document the facility had an RN on duty for eight consecutive hours each day. The facility's Daily Assignment Sheets dated 11/20/24, 11/25/24, and 11/26/24 document V2 Director of Nursing worked between three and four hours on second shift on these dates and there were no other RNs listed. On 12/3/24 at 2:20 PM the Daily Assignment Sheets were reviewed with V2. V2 confirmed all of the nurses listed on the assignment sheets for 11/21/24-11/24/24, 11/27/24, 11/28/24, 11/30/24, and 12/1/24 are Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNS) and the facility did not have eight consecutive hours of RN coverage each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer insulin and diabetic medications timely and as ordered for four (R1, R2, R4, R7) of four residents reviewed for insulin in the sample list of seven. Findings include: The facility's Medication Administration Policy dated October 2024 documents medication administration is documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR), medications must be administered according to physician's orders including the right time, and to notify the physician of medication errors. The Resident Council Minutes dated 11/27/24 documents concerns with morning medications taking three hours to get and an insulin problem. 1.) R1's November 2024 MARs document to administer Humulin R (Regular insulin) U-500 (concentrated) units/milliliter give 40 units subcutaneously three times daily at 8:00 AM, 11:00 AM and 4:00 PM. There is no documentation that this medication was administered as ordered on 11/6/24 for all doses, 11/9/24 at 4:00 PM, 11/11/24 at 4:00 PM, 11/14/24 at 11:00 AM and 4:00 PM, and 11/25/24 at 4:00 PM. R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to routinely assess for pain and develop a care plan to address pain for one (R1) of five residents reviewed for accidents in the sample list of seven. Findings include: The facility's Pain Management Program dated October 2024 documents the pain assessment protocol will be initiated when: the pain assessment identifies pain on admission with changes in condition including incidents associated with potential for pain, identified on the Minimum Data Set (MDS), pain medication is given routinely or pain is not controlled, a change in condition occurs that requires pain control, a significant increase in use of PRN (as needed) pain medication, there is a change in pain related to behavior/cognition/mood, and when there is a diagnosis associated with pain/discomfort. This policy documents to use a pain rating scale to determine level of pain, develop and implement a care plan to address pain, assess for pain during routine medication administrations and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to address behavioral disturbances associated with dementia for three (R3, R4, R6) of five residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 14. Findings include: 1.) The facility's Final Report to IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) documents on 2/28/24 at 3:45 PM R7 walked into R3 and R3 pushed R7 causing R7 to fall. The facility's Final Report to IDPH documents the following: On 10/13/2024 at 1:45 PM V1 Administrator in Training was notified of an altercation between R3 and R4. Staff heard scuffling in R4's room and witnessed R3 had R4 by the arm and would not let go. R3 is very territorial (per usual). This most likely occurred due to a recent room change that caused R3 and R4 to share a bathroom. R4 was moved to a different room. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3 has severe cognitive impairment, hallucinations, and daily verbal, physical, and other behaviors during the review period.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-30 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed provide quarterly statements for Resident Trust Funds for five (R1, R2, R3, R5, R6) of five residents reviewed for Trust Funds in the sample list of six. Findings include: The facility's undated Resident Funds Policy and Procedure documents The facility will institute security measures to insure that resident funds managed by the facility are safeguarded from theft or mismanagement and shall include: signed vouchers for all resident transactions, computerized tracking of account activity, monthly oversight by the facility Administrator, and signed quarterly statements. On 9/30/24 V1 Administrator in Training provided the facility's Resident Trust Fund binder which contained monthly logs that document transactions, withdrawals, and balances for residents. The binder included R1's, R2's, R3's, R5's, and R6's Resident Trust Fund Transaction Logs dated July-September 2024. These logs were not signed by the residents and there were no signed quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-30 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure its Surety Bond provided adequate coverage of Resident Trust Funds. This failure affects five (R1, R2, R3, R5, R6) of five residents reviewed for Resident Trust Funds in the sample list of six. Findings include: The facility's undated Resident Funds Policy and Procedure documents a Surety Bond has been purchased to insure the total amount of the facility's Resident Trust Funds. On 9/30/24 V1 Administrator in Training provided the facility's Resident Trust Fund binder which contained monthly logs that document transactions, withdrawals, and balances for each resident. The binder included R1's, R2's, R3's, R5's, and R6's Resident Trust Fund Transaction Logs dated July-September 2024. The facility's July 2024 Resident Trust Fund bank statement documents an ending balance of $136,483.09 on 7/31/24. The facility's August 2024 Resident Trust Fund bank statement documents an ending balance of $146,255.16 on 8/30/24. The facility's September 2024 Resident Trust Fund bank statement documents a balance of $168,628.65 as of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse for one (R1) of four residents reviewed for abuse in the sample list of six. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents all allegations involving abuse and exploitation must be reported to officials in accordance with state law, including notifying the Illinois Department of Public Health if there is suspicion of sexual abuse within two hours of forming the suspicion, otherwise report within 24 hours. The facility's Fax (Electronic Facsimile) Worksheet IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Notification Form dated 9/13/24 documents on 9/13/24 at 11:00 PM V1 Administrator In Training was notified of an allegation of misappropriation of R1's property involving V3 Business Office Manager and V4 Activity Aide. The facility's investigative file for this allegation included V1's handwritten notes dated 9/13/24 at 11:00 PM which document the facility received an anonymous call alleging that V3 and V4 allowed R1 to touch their breasts and kiss them in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Failures at this level require more than one deficient practice statement. A. Based on record review and interview the facility failed to monitor potential exposure sites for Legionella. This failure has the potential to affect all 44 residents who reside in the facility. B.) Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to don PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) prior to entering a contact isolation room for one of one resident (R34) reviewed for transmission based precautions in the sample list of 36. Findings include: a.) The Long-Term Care Facility Application For Medicare and Medicaid dated 8/25/24 documents 44 residents reside in the facility. The facility's policy Legionella Policy and Procedures (not dated) states Legionella Bacteria thrive and multiply in hot or cold water systems and storage tanks and then spread through spray from showers and taps. Should concerns are identified the following measures may be initiated to minimize and control the risks: Have the water system inspected, maintained, and cleaned. (Annually). Ensure water cannot…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to employ a certified Infection Preventionist. This failure has the potential to affect all 44 residents who reside at the facility. Findings Include: The Long-Term Care Facility Application For Medicare and Medicaid dated 8/25/24 documents 44 residents reside in the facility. The facility's Infection Control Surveillance and Monitoring Policy reviewed 12/7/18 states It is the policy of the facility to do routine surveillance and and monitoring of the facility to determine if compliance with work practices and care of protective clothing and equipment is maintained. Procedure: Monitoring the effectiveness of the facility work practices and protective equipment will be conducted by the Administrator, Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) and the Director of nursing (DON). This includes but is not limited to: a. Surveillance of the facility to ensure that required work practices are observed and that protective equipment and clothing are provided and properly used; b. Investigation of known or suspected parenteral exposure to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable, and functional environment by failing to maintain the building structure to prevent roof leaks. This failure affects one (R12) of 16 residents reviewed for environment in the sample of 36. This failure has the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 8/25/24 at 8:09 AM near the nurse's station, centralized area where all of the resident halls connect, and the beginning of the C Hall the ceiling tiles were sagging and had large brown stains. One tile had been removed and there were cords visible hanging down approximately a couple inches below the ceiling. On 8/25/24 at 8:20 AM R12 was lying in bed. R12's room had a brown stained ceiling tile near R12's doorway. R12 stated R12 admitted to the facility in October 2023 and the brown area on the ceiling tile has gotten larger since R12's admission. R12 stated the facility's roof leaks when it rains which is what causes the brown discoloration. On 8/28/24 at 8:40 AM the ceiling tiles near the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain laboratory tests as ordered and repeatedly failed to document blood glucose results for three of three residents (R4, R25, R46) reviewed for laboratory services in the sample list of 36. Findings include: The facility's Glucose Monitoring policy with a revised date of August 2018 documents, Purpose: To monitor resident's blood glucose to assist in the development of an appropriate medication and treatment regime for resident's with a metabolic disorder caused by an imbalance between insulin supply and demand. Document results of blood glucose and insulin dosage on medication sheet. The facility's undated Laboratory Tests policy documents, Obtain laboratory orders upon admission, readmission and PRN (as needed) for medication and condition monitoring per the physician's order. 1.) R4's Order Summary Report documents a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with an admission date of 11/18/22. This Order Summary document an order for an A1C (glycated hemoglobin) every three months. R4's pharmacy consultation report dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure for the dignity of two (R5, R15) of 16 residents reviewed for dignity from a total sample list of 36 residents. Findings include: The facility Abuse Prevention Program Policy dated 11/28/16 documents that the facility prohibits mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse of its residents, and has attempted to establish a resident sensitive and resident secure environment. Additionally the facility seeks to establish an environment that promotes resident sensitivity, resident security, and prevention of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of resident misappropriation of resident property. 1.) R5's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents that R5 is cognitively intact. R5's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents that R5 is dependent for personal hygiene. On 8/25/26 at 12:26PM, R5 said that V12 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) wasn't always nice to her and could make her feel bad and hurt her feelings. R5 said that V12 CNA would get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to schedule a follow up cardiology appointment for one (R46) of two residents reviewed for dialysis in the sample list of 36. Findings include: R46's Diagnoses List documents R46's diagnoses include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Seizures, Stenosis of Carotid Artery, and Nonrheumatic Mitral Valve Prolapse. R46's Census documents R46 expired on [DATE]. R46's Hospital Discharge Instructions dated [DATE] documents R46's discharge problems were Acute Respiratory Failure and Hypertension, R46 has dialysis scheduled three times weekly, and to contact V27's office (Cardiologist) to schedule a follow up appointment. There is no documentation in R46's medical record that the facility contacted V27's office to schedule this appointment. On [DATE] at 11:02 AM V11 Social Services Director stated V11 is responsible for scheduling resident appointments. V11 reviewed the facility's appointment calendar and did not see that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain treatment orders and implement pressure relieving interventions for three (R5, R14 and R4) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcer wounds from a total sample list of 36 residents. Findings include: The facility Preventative Skin Care Policy dated October 2006 documents that it is the policy of the facility to provide preventative skin care through repositioning and careful washing, rinsing, drying and observation of the residents skin condition to keep them clean, comfortable, well groomed and free from pressure ulcers. If reddened areas are noted, it will be reported to the Charge Nurse. Any resident identified as being at high risk for potential skin breakdown shall be turned and reposition a minimum of every two hours. The facility Decubitus Care/Pressure Areas Policy dated January 2018 documents that it is the policy of this facility to ensure a proper treatment program has been instituted and is being closely monitored to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for one (R2) resident from another resident (R1) with known aggressive behaviors. This failure affects two (R1, R2) out of three residents reviewed for abuse in a sample list of three residents. Findings include: R2's undated Face Sheet documents R2's medical diagnoses as Alzheimer's Disease, Altered Mental Status, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Muscle Weakness, Glaucoma and Delusional Disorders. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS document R2 as being dependent on staff for all areas of Activities of Daily Living. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R1 had no impairment in functional ability and did not require any mobility device. R2's Careplan intervention dated 10/12/2023 instructs staff to cue, orient and supervise as needed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by a staff member. This failure affected two of four residents (R2, R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of four. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents the facility affirms the right of it's residents to be free from abuse or mistreatment. Verbal abuse is the use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Examples of verbal abuse include, but are not limited to, threats of harm, or saying things to frighten a resident, such as telling a resident that he/she will never to be able to see his/her family again. The Abuse Investigation Report dated 5/1/24 documents on 4/30/24 at 9:00 PM V5 Agency Nurse was taking residents outside to smoke. R2 reminded V5 that R3 needed a smoking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to employ a Registered Nurse to serve as full time Director of Nurses (DON). This failure has the potential to affect all 47 residents in the facility. Findings Include: Upon survey entrance and throughout the survey (5/2/24- 5/3/24) there was no Director of Nurses present and employed by the facility. On 5/3/24 at 1:40 PM V1 Administrator confirmed the facility does not currently employ a full time Director of Nurses. There has not been a full time DON employed by the facility since March 2024. V1 confirmed the facility census is currently 47 residents. The facility's Facility assessment dated [DATE] documents a full time nursing supervisor (Director of Nurses) is required in order to meet the resident's needs and provide competent support and care for the facility's resident population.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by another resident by failing to follow the Abuse Prevention Program and remove an alleged perpetrator and implement interventions in order to keep others free from abuse. This failure affected three of five residents (R1, R2, R3) reviewed for abuse in the sample of nine. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents the facility affirms the right of it's residents to be free from abuse or mistreatment. Physical abuse is the infliction of injury on a resident that occurs other than by accidental means. Physical abuse can include such things as hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. The policy documents residents who allegedly mistreat or abuse another resident will be removed from contact with other residents during the course of the investigation. The accused resident's condition shall be immediately evaluated to determine the most suitable intervention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient Registered Nursing (RN) hours on three of eight days reviewed for RN staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 48 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility Nursing Schedule (April 19, 2024 through April 26, 2024) document on 4/19/24, 4/20/24, and 4/21/24, the facility scheduled zero (0) hours of RN coverage for a 24 hour period. On 4/26/24 at 10:22am, V1 Administrator in Training confirmed the hours listed on the facility nursing schedule were correct and the facility failed to have RN coverage on 4/19/24, 4/20/24, and 4/21/24. The facility Resident Midnight Census dated 4/26/24 documents 48 residents reside in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient Registered Nursing (RN) hours on two of 18 days reviewed for RN staffing. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents in the facility. Findings include: The facility Nursing Schedule (April 1, 2024 through April 18, 2024) document on Saturday 4/6/24 and Sunday 47/24, the facility scheduled zero (0) hours of RN coverage for a 24 hour period. On 4/18/24 at 9:55am, V1 Administrator in Training confirmed the hours listed on the facility nursing schedule were correct and the facility failed to have RN coverage on 4/6/24 and 4/7/24. The facility Resident Midnight Census dated 4/18/24 documents 49 residents reside in the facility.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and homelike environment for nine of nine (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, and R9) residents reviewed for their environment on the sample list of seven. This failure also has the potential to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 4/15/24 at 10:00 AM, the facility's drop ceiling had multiple water stained, missing, and bulging ceiling tiles in the hallways, common areas, and in the residents' bedrooms and bathrooms. The stains on these tiles were dark yellow to brown in color, circular, and ranged from saucer to dinner plate width in size. These observations included: two water stained ceiling tiles outside of room [ROOM NUMBER], three water stained ceiling tiles outside of the double doors entering the D hall, five water stained ceiling tiles in a common area where residents watch television, a missing ceiling tile and three water stained ceiling tiles by the double doors going into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from abuse perpetrated by another resident. This failure affects two residents (R1 and R3) out of five reviewed for abuse allegations on the sample list of 24. Findings include: 1. The facility's Initial Report to the Illinois Department of Public Health dated 3/8/24 documents an alleged resident to resident altercation. This same report documents the aggressor (R2) was sent to the emergency room for evaluation. The facility's Final Report to IDPH dated 3/11/24 documents R1 had been wandering in and out of other resident's rooms including R2's room. R2 had grabbed hold of R1's wrist and jerked R1's arm. This report documents a staff member (V3, Activity Assistant) attempted to intervene but R2 also grabbed hold of V3's wrist. Another staff member (V14, Certified Nursing Assistant) intervened and was able to separate the involved residents and staff member. This Final Report documents R2 had been hospitalized at a geriatric psychiatric service clinic for evaluation and treatment. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-20 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide therapy services as ordered by the physician for three of three residents (R17, R18, R19) out of seven reviewed for therapy on the sample list of 24. Findings Include: The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documents the facility provides therapy services through a contract agency. On 3/20/24 at 1:32 pm, V1 AIT (Administrator in Training) stated the facility currently does not have a therapy service and hasn't since 2/20/24. V1 stated the prior contracted therapy company walked out and stopped providing [NAME] due to non-payment by the facility's corporate ownership entity. V1 further stated a new company had been scheduled to begin providing services at the facility on 3/4/24 but had not yet come to the facility. V1 concluded by stating there were three residents who did not complete their prescribed course of therapy, R17, R18, and R19. 1. R18's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 2/13/24 documents R18 is alert and oriented. On 3/20/24 at 10:39 am,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a full time Director of Nursing. This failure has the potential to affect all 48 residents who reside at the facility. Findings Include: On 2/6/24 at 8:45 am, V2 AIT (Administrator in Training) stated the facility does not have a DON (Director of Nursing) or anyone serving as a DON full time explaining that the former DON quit on 1/19/24. The Facility assessment dated [DATE] documents the facility will have an RN with administrative duties 8-12 hours a day. The facility Nurses Midnight Census dated 2/5/24 documents 48 residents reside at the facility.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Director of Nursing was working full time in the facility and failed to have a Registered Nurse working eight consecutive hours in a 24 hour period for five of 11 days reviewed. This has the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The Facility Assessment with a review date of 8/14/23 documents the Administrator as V1 Administrator in Training and does not document any Director of Nursing. The Assessment documents the Facility Staff Needs (hours per day) of Licensed nurses providing direct care as 24 hours per day and Other nursing personnel (e.g. {example} those with administrative duties) as 8-12 hours per day. This Assessment does not distinguish how many of those hours should be from a Registered Nurse or the Director of Nursing. On 1/23/24 at 9:39 AM, V1 Administrator in Training stated that they do not currently have a Director of Nursing. On 1/23/24 at 1:35 PM, V2 former Director of Nursing stated that her last day working for the facility was on 1/12/24.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-24 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a licensed administrator managing the facility. This failure has the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 1/24/24 at 10:53 AM, V1 stated that V1 is the facility's Administrator In Training and has been since 8/16/23. V1 stated V1 has not yet applied for a temporary administrator license but is taking classes to do so. V1 stated that V15 Regional Administrator currently holds the administrator license for the facility but is not in the building. The facility's Facility assessment dated [DATE] documents staffing is scheduled based on the facility's needs and required staffing guidelines and does not include an Administrator in those calculations. This assessment lists V1 as the facility's Administrator. The facility's Midnight Census dated 1/23/24 documents 48 residents reside in the building.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse (R1) to the Abuse Coordinator. This failure affects 11 residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13) residing on the Dementia unit reviewed for abuse in the sample list of 13. Findings include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program policy with a revised date of 11/28/2016 documents, The facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation as defined below. Internal Reporting Requirements and Identification of Allegations Employees are required to immediately report any occurrences of potential/alleged mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, and abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property they observe, hear about, or suspect to a supervisor and the administrator. The facility's Final Report for the incident dated 1/9/24 at 8:30 PM documents, Summary: (V1/Administrator in Training) was notified of alleged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one of five residents (R1) reviewed for accuracy of medical records on the sample list of four. Findings include: On 1/23/24 at 9:00 AM, V1 Administrator in Training provided the Abuse Investigations for the prior three months. R1 is documented as having a resident to employee incident on 1/9/24. The facility's Final Report for the incident dated 1/9/24 at 8:30 PM documents, Summary: (V1/Administrator in Training) was notified of alleged verbal abuse from staff-(V4 Certified Nursing Assistant) towards (R1). Investigation: (V1) reviews the facility cameras, and interviewed staff and residents. Based on staff interviews, (V4) was heard yelling and using inappropriate language at (R1) to keep her clothes on. The review of cameras are inconclusive, show (V4) walk off the unit and leaving it unattended. Conclusion: Abuse is unfound, due to lack of evidence. However the employee will be terminated due to not a good fit for our resident or facility. (V1) in-serviced all staff on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize their Abuse Prevention Program by failing to complete pre-employment background screenings for an employee and failing to investigate and report allegations of misappropriation of property. This failure has the potential to affect four of four residents (R1, R2, R3 and R4) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of four. Findings Include: The facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents the facility will implement systems to investigate all reports and allegations of mistreatment, exploitation, neglect, abuse of residents and misappropriation of resident property; promptly and aggressively, and make necessary changes to prevent future occurrences. Prior to a new employee starting a work schedule this facility will initiate a reference check from previous employer(s), check the Illinois Health Care Worker Registry on all individuals being hired for a position and potentially bordering states that the individual is known to have been licensed/certified in, based on the individuals resume or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are free of misappropriation of property for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of four. Findings Include: The facility Abuse Prevention Program dated 11/28/16 documents this facility affirms the right of our residents to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation as defined below. Misappropriation of resident property means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation or wrongful temporary or permanent use of a resident's belongings or money without the resident's consent. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/30/23 documents R1 is alert and oriented. R1's abuse folder contained a Facility Reported Incidents Smart Sheet Form dated 12/7/23 documents, R1 reported that R1's debit card was missing. R1 called the banking company and was told that R1's card had been used several times. The facility assisted R1 with calling the local police department to file a report on 11/8/23. A print out of transactions dated 11/8/23 documents a total of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of misappropriation of resident property to the State Survey Agency and local police for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of four. Findings Include: The facility's Grievance Log contained the following grievance's from R1: 8/29/23 - R1 reported someone tried to use R1's card to pay a bill at Verizon. R1 asked to get more information. R1 called card company and they will refund the money to the card in 7-14 days. Police called and R1 was educated on not giving R1's card to anyone to use and R1 said R1 would work on it. 10/6/23 - R1 claims $105 is missing from R1's room and that the money was in a black sock. This grievance has a response from V9 SSD (Social Service Director) that documents V9 talked with R1 about money and asked R1 questions like where the money came from, is there a receipt to show that much was taken out of the bank or credit card and to verify how R1 knew it was $105. R1 claims R1 received the money from a friend and that person said it was $105. V9 then…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate allegations of misappropriation of resident property for one of four residents (R1) reviewed for abuse on the sample list of four. Findings Include: The facility's Grievance Log contained the following grievance's from R1: 8/29/23 - R1 reported someone tried to use R1's card to pay a bill at Verizon. R1 asked to get more information. R1 called card company and they will refund the money to the card in 7-14 days. Police called and R1 was educated on not giving R1's card to anyone to use and R1 said R1 would work on it. 10/6/23 - R1 claims $105 is missing from R1's room and that the money was in a black sock. This grievance has a response from V9 SSD (Social Service Director) that documents V9 talked with R1 about money and asked R1 questions like where the money came from, is there a receipt to show that much was taken out of the bank or credit card and to verify how R1 knew it was $105. R1 claims R1 received the money from a friend and that person said it was $105. V9 then asked R1 if R1 had any witnesses and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist had completed required training on infection prevention and control. This failure has the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: The facility's Infection Control Surveillance and Monitoring policy dated as revised 4/11/22 documents the facility will have routine surveillance and monitoring to determine compliance with infection control practices and the Director of Nursing (DON) may perform these duties if the DON has an approved Infection Control Certification. On 10/4/23 at 7:53 AM V1 Administrator in Training (AIT) stated the facility has a few Scabies cases, one confirmed, and two suspected. V1 stated V2 is the DON and is also the facility's Infection Preventionist. On 10/4/23 at 1:27 PM V2 DON stated V2 does not have Infection Preventionist training, and V2 wasn't aware until today that V2 was also responsible for the Infection Preventionist duties. V2 stated V2's employment began on 9/27/23. The facility's Nurses Midnight Census dated 10/3/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain updated infection control logs, report a communicable disease to the local health department, label isolation linen containers, handle linens appropriately, and implement isolation for a resident (R2) with suspected Scabies (a highly contagious skin condition caused by a mite). These failures affect four (R1, R2, R3, R4) of four residents reviewed for infection control in the sample list of four. Findings include: 1.) The facility's Infection Control Logs dated 3/23/23-10/3/23 do not document R1 was diagnosed with Scabies on 10/2/23 or that R2 and R3 were treated for Scabies. R1's Dermatology Progress Note dated 10/2/23 documents R1 had a rash with pustules noted throughout entire body, and R1 tested positive for Scabies on 10/2/23. This note documents orders to administer Elimite 5% cream apply from neck to toes and administer Ivermectin 3 milligrams five tablets once on 10/2/23 and then repeat in 7 days. R2's Nursing Note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for one (R3) of three residents reviewed for showers in the sample list of four. Findings include: R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R3 has severe cognitive impairment and bathing did not occur during the 7 day lookback period. R3's shower documentation for September-October 2023 provided by V1 Administrator in Training and V2 Director of Nursing, documents NA Not Applicable for R3's showers that were scheduled on 9/9/23, 9/15/23, and 9/19/23 and R3 is scheduled to receive showers twice weekly. There was no documentation that R3 received showers scheduled on 9/9/23, 9/15/23, and 9/19/23. On 10/4/23 at 1:27 PM V2 stated R3 is scheduled for showers twice weekly. V2 confirmed staff should document the shower as given or refused, and not NA. At 4:40 PM V2 stated V2 had no additional shower documentation to provide for R3. .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor a rash, document weekly skin assessments, and report a newly identified rash to the physician to obtain treatment orders. These failures affect two (R1, R3) of four residents reviewed for rashes in the sample list of four. Findings include: 1.) R1's Physician Progress Note dated 8/17/23 documents R1 has a dermatological rash that is resolving. R1's Shower Sheet dated 8/15/23 and 9/13/23 documents redness to R1's groin. R1's September 2023 Medication/Treatment Administration Record (MAR/TAR) documents to apply Hydrocortisone 0.5 % cream to the right ankle daily as of 4/4/23, apply Clotrimazole External Ointment 1 % topically to perineum twice daily as of 7/31/23, and apply Triamcinolone Acetonide 0.1 % Cream topically to trunk, abdomen, back twice daily for allergic dermatitis. These treatments are documented as administered between 9/1/23 and 9/30/23. This MAR/TAR documents to complete a skin assessment weekly and indicate C=Clear; R=Rash, O=Other, P=Pressure, S= Skin Tear. R1's skin assessments are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$421,200 in federal fines across 5 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $12,142 — penalty dated 2025-08-26
- $18,680 — penalty dated 2025-08-26
- $204,887 — penalty dated 2024-08-28
- $147,089 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
- $38,402 — penalty dated 2023-10-04
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-25 for 83 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-25 for 95 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOLDFARB, BRIAN | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/01/2024 |
| ANUGWOM, VIVIAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| GRONSKY, AMANDA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| MCCLURE, MICHELLE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| ARCADIA CARE MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/16/2025 |
| AHEARN, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| MCCANN, THOMAS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| SEITLER, DOVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| SPECTOR, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| TUROFSKY, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| WILHELM, NAFTALI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| CURIS SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
| PETERSEN SNF HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/16/2025 |
| RAJCHENBACH, CHAIM | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $615K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145389. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.