Iroquois Resident Home, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 35 beds and averages 33.4 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.92 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2024-06-26 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to employ an Infection Preventionist. This failure has the potential to affect all 27 residents residing in facility. Findings include: The facility Daily Midnight Census dated 6/24/24 documents 27 residents residing in the facility. Observations were made during Annual Licensure and Certification survey from 6/24/24/-6/26/26 with no Infection Preventionist onsite. On 6/25/24 at 12:45 PM V2 Director of Nurses (DON) stated the facility does not currently have an Infection Preventionist (IP). V2 DON stated the previous IP left the facility a month ago. V2 stated V2 is planning on signing up for the IP class but has not yet. On 6/26/24 at 9:05 AM V1 Administrator confirmed the facility does not currently have an Infection Preventionist. V1 Administrator stated I know we (facility) are small but having an IP would be a great benefit. We (facility) do have residents who are prescribed antibiotics, who are on contact isolation and staff who need education and monitoring for proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess, treat, and notify the physician of newly acquired pressure ulcers and apply a physician ordered treatment for one of one (R23) resident reviewed for pressure ulcers on the sample list of 18. Findings include: On 6/24/24 at 1:25 PM, R23 was sitting in a recliner in his room. R23 stated he was having terrible pain to his bottom. R23 stated, It's sore! On 6/26/24 at 10:00 AM, V8 Certified Nurse's Assistant stated that she worked on Sunday (6/23/24) and noticed that R23 had open areas to his buttocks and coccyx. V8 stated she notified V10 Licensed Practical Nurse about the open areas. V8 stated she worked Sunday (6/23/24), yesterday (6/25/24), and today (6/26/24) and has not seen a treatment on R23's buttocks or coccyx. On 6/26/24 at 10:10 AM, a dime sized pressure ulcer was present to the left of R23's coccyx, an eraser head sized pressure ulcer was present to the right of R23's coccyx, and a thick, red, raised area of skin containing scattered open areas was present on R23's left buttock along the entire…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions, complete thorough fall investigations to determine root causes and failed to complete Neurological Assessments post falls for two (R2, R25) residents out of two residents reviewed for accidents in a sample list of 18 residents. Findings include: 1.) R2's undated Face Sheet documents R2's medical diagnoses as Cellulitis of the Right Lower Limb, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Atrial Fibrillation, Weakness, Repeated Falls and Altered Mental Status. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R2 as requiring moderate assistance for toileting, bed mobility and transferring. R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R2 as a high risk for falling. R2's Care Plan intervention dated 3/22/24 instructs staff to anticipate and meet the needs of the resident. This same care plan documents R2 should be offered toileting every two hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to position urinary drainage bags in a manner that prevented potential cross contamination for two of two residents (R23, R230) reviewed for catheters on the sample list of 18. Findings include: The facility's Catheter Care Handling policy with a revision date of August of 2022 documents to ensure catheter tubing and drainage bags are kept up off of the floor. 1. On 6/24/24 at 1:25 PM, R23's urinary drainage bag was clipped to the side of a trash can. This drainage bag was not covered and the bottom of the bag was sitting directly on the floor. On 6/26/24 at 11:16 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated all urinary drainage bags should be covered and not touching the floor. 2. On 6/24/24 at 2:02 PM, R230 was sitting in a recliner. R230's urinary drainage bag was hooked to the side of the recliner. The urinary drainage bag was not covered and the bottom of the bag was touching the floor. On 6/26/24 at 11:16 AM, V2 DON stated that urinary drainage bags should be below the bladder but not touching the floor.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess one (R2) resident for the use of side rails out of one resident reviewed for side rails in a sample list of 18 residents. Findings include: R2's undated Face Sheet documents R2's medical diagnoses as Cellulitis of the Right Lower Limb, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Atrial Fibrillation, Weakness, Repeated Falls and Altered Mental Status. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R2 as requiring moderate assistance for toileting, bed mobility and transferring. R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) does not document a side rail assessment for R2. On 6/25/24 at 2:00 PM R2 was laying in his bed with both siderails in the up position. On 6/26/24 at 10:35 AM V5 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator stated R2 has never been assessed for siderails. V5 stated (R2) should not have those side rails on his bed. We (facility) are taking them off. The facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain psychotropic medication consents, assess the need for psychotropic medications, determine symptoms or behaviors warranting use, utilize nonpharmacological interventions, monitor for adverse reactions, establish a psychotropic care plan, and establish parameters for the use of an as needed antianxiety medication for three (R230, 231, 232) of three residents reviewed for psychotropic medications on the sample list of 18. Findings include: The facility's Psychotropic Medication Protocol policy dated 8/31/2022 documents psychotropic/psychoactive medications will not be prescribed without the informed consent of the resident, the resident's guardian, or other authorized representatives, and will be provided with and have signed an Informed Consent for Psychotropic Medications. Information will also be provided with given information regarding the need for, the desired effects and the potential side effects of the medication. Residents will not be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for three residents (R23, R25, R230) out of four residents reviewed for Infection Control in a sample list of 18 residents. Findings include: 1. R25's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated June 2024 documents a physician order starting 4/17/24 for Jevity 1.5 calorie/Fiber liquid. Give 355 milliliters (ml) via Gastrostomy tube (G-Tube) every shift for nutritional supplement. Flush with 50 milliliter (ml) water before and after each feeding. On 6/24/24 at 10:30 AM R25's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documents R25 has a Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) in use. R25's room was not identified with an Enhanced Barrier Precaution sign. There was no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) available to enter R25's room. No isolation disposal bins were located in or near R25's room. On 6/25/24 at 2:45 PM V9 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) completed R25's Gastrostomy tube (G-tube) dressing change. V9 LPN did not wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) gown during R25's G-tube dressing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their Antibiotic Stewardship Protocol by administering a prophylactic antibiotic for one of four residents (R10) reviewed for Infection Control in a sample list of 18 residents. Findings include: R10's undated Face Sheet documents R10's medical diagnoses as: Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia and a personal history of Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R10 as severely cognitively impaired. R10's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated June 2024 document a physician order starting 12/24/23 for Cephalexin 250 milligrams (mg) daily for recurrent Urinary Tract Infections (UTI). R10's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated June 2024 documents R10 was administered Cephalexin 250 mg daily for the month of June, 2024. The facility antibiotic tracking log dated January-June 2024 documents R10 was on Cephalexin 250 mg daily prophylactically for a history of UTI's. On 6/25/24 at 1:30 PM V2 Director of Nurses (DON)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure bed rails were safely attached to a bed for one of one resident (R2) reviewed for side rails in a sample list of 18 residents. Findings include: R2's undated Face Sheet documents R2's medical diagnoses as Cellulitis of the Right Lower Limb, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Atrial Fibrillation, Weakness, Repeated Falls and Altered Mental Status. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R2 as severely cognitively impaired. This same MDS documents R2 as requiring moderate assistance for toileting, bed mobility and transferring. R2's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated June 2024 documents a physician order starting 3/15/24 for bed rails for bed mobility and positioning. R2's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents R2 as a high risk for falling. On 6/24/24 at 9:35 AM R2 was laying in bed with both legs hanging off of mattress from knees to feet. R2's quarter bed rail on the same side of bed was hanging at a 45…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of sexual abuse to the Administrator for two of three residents (R1, R2) reviewed for sexual abuse on the sample list of three. Findings Include: The facility's Serious Injury Incident and Communicable Disease Report dated 4/10/24 at 12:15 pm documents, on 4/9/24 at 12:45 pm, R2 leaned over and kissed R1 on the lips. Since both R1 and R2 have a very low BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score; R1 being a 1 {indicating severe cognitive impairments} and R2 being a 4 {indicating severe cognitive impairments}, the intervention in place is to make sure that residents are watched and separated to prevent this from happening again. On 4/17/24 at 11:09 am, V1 (Administrator) stated on 4/10/24, V8 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) came up to V1 and asked V1 if V1 was aware of what happened on 4/9/24 between R1 and R2. V1 explained V1 was unaware of anything happening, then V8 reported that V8 had been told that R2 kissed R1. V1 stated V8 did not know any of the specifics though and told V1 to talk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in IL