Waukegan Health And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

30.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 23.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 78.8 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.27 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safely transfer a resident (R1). This failure resulted in R1 being hit in the head with the arm of the mechanical lift, resulting in a large skin tear, being admitted to the hospital, and requirng sutures to her head. This applies to one of three residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of five. The findings include: The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R1 to be cognitively intact, requires maximum assistance for her activities of daily living and uses a mechanical lift for her transfers. On 12/21/23 at 11:15 AM, R1 said she was being lifted from her bed to her wheelchair using the mechanical lift. R1 said as she was being lowered to her wheelchair, the arm bar on the lift hit her in the head. R1 said she saw stars and was in a lot of pain. R1 said she had to be taken to the hospital for sutures, and had to spend the night and have scans to her brain to rule out a brain injury. R1 said she was very scared and in a lot of pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was assisted in safe manner to prevent injury for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 4. This failure resulted in (R1) sustaining a fall and receiving a right ankle fracture. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows she has diagnoses including: Parkinsonism, anxiety disorder, auditory and visual hallucinations, and a history of falls. R1's current care plan shows on 10/6/23 Impaired Memory care plan was initiated which says R1 is having impaired memory and problems with decision-making, insight, logic, calculation, reasoning, planning and judgement. R1's active Fall Risk care plan initiated 3/9/17 shows R1 is at risk for falls and she requires a one person assist for transfers. R1's active Transfer-Restorative care plan initiated on 3/9/17 shows R1 is unable to transfer independently and requires a one person assist and a gait belt for transfers. R1's Physical Therapy Progress Report from 10/27/23-11/13/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7. The findings include:R1's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility 3/17/26 with diagnoses to include senile degeneration of brain, cellulitis of left upper limb, dementia, muscle weakness, and atrial fibrillation. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed he has severe cognitive impairment and requires substantial to maximum assist of staff for most cares. R1's Care Plan initiated 3/20/26 showed, The resident's memory is impaired. Consequently, the resident has problems with decision-making, insight, logic, calculation, reasoning, planning, and judgement. R1's Care Plan initiated 4/2/26 showed, the resident has a history of behavior problem such as hitting staff related disease process. Intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others. Approach/Speak in a calm manner.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement safety interventions for 2 of 2 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for safety in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 being hit in the face by R2's involuntary movements. The findings include: R1's face sheet printed on 12/2/25 showed diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, non-traumatic brain dysfunction, and mood disorder. R1's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 has severe cognitive impairment and uses a wheelchair. R1's progress note dated 11/25/25 stated: At around 6:30 pm resident was sitting near the first-floor nurses' station next to a male resident who struck her on the right side of her face. Writer immediately separated the residents and assessed resident's eye and face, there appeared to be no injury, 911 called,. Progress notes showed R1 was transported to the local emergency room and returned the same day without injury. R2's face sheet printed on 12/2/25 showed diagnoses including but not limited to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-28 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
  Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide R1 with the necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 6.The findings include:On 10/27/25 at 10:35AM, R1 was lying in bed watching television. R1 sat up on the side of the bed and placed her feet on the floor. R1 said, a couple of weeks ago one of the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant) took my vital signs and said, I am going to help you with your shower. I told the CNA I can do it myself. I have been here 5 years and only needed someone to help me with my back. The CNA's hands were all over me. I told the CNA to stop. The CNA said, take it easy. In the past, the staff would provide privacy while I washed myself. The staff may have washed my back, now I have a back brush; no one is touching me again. When the CNA started washing me. I told the CNA to stop. The CNA thought I was being funny. I said, you…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe food handling practices were followed to prevent cross-contamination. This has the potential to affect all residents that receive food and nourishments from the kitchen. The findings include: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid form 671 dated 5/19/25, shows there are 88 residents that reside in the facility. On 5/21/25 at 10:40 AM, V10 (Director of Culinary Services) said at this time, all residents residing in the facility receive food, beverage, or nourishment from the kitchen at this time; even those receiving a tube feeding because they are ordered pleasure feeding. 1. On 5/19/25 at 11:25 AM, V11 (Cook) dropped a white cleaning towel onto the floor. V11 picked up the towel and continued to wipe down the food prep counter next to the oven, wipe down and clean a thermometer, clean down the prep counter that attaches in front of the steam table, and then placed the towel by the three-compartment sink. On 5/19/25 at 11:36 AM, V10 began the mechanical soft chicken process and used a green handle scoop…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the bathroom was clean and homelike. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R48, R50, R56, R60) in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 5/20/25 at 9:31 AM, during the resident council meeting, R48, R50, R56 and R60 said the first bathroom/shower room looks like there is mold on the ceiling, it's been like that for a while. There has been no maintenance staff over a month to fix repairs, the last one was fired. On 5/20/25 at 10:06 AM, in the bathroom/shower room on the first floor a brown/yellowish discoloration of dried water rings with pieces of peeled paint and drywall hanging from the ceiling above the toilet. On 5/21/25 at 10:55 AM, V1 (Administrator) said we don't have a maintenance staff right now, our permanent maintenance staff left in October 2024, since then we have hired a couple of new maintenance staff and they have not worked out. The bathroom ceiling does not have mold, there was a leaky toilet upstairs on the 2nd floor that caused the damage. We were waiting to repair the ceiling after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure anti-psychotic psychotropic medications had a stop date of 14 days for 1 of 6 residents (R15) reviewed for unnecessary medications in the sample of 18. The findings include: R15's face sheet shows she has diagnoses including cerebral infarction, unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. R15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) shows she entered hospice care on 1/28/25. A Hospice Interdisciplinary Plan of Care completed on 3/20/25 shows an order for R15 to receive Risperdal (risperidone) (Anti-psychotic medication) 1 milligram (mg.) every morning and to continue PRN (as needed) Risperdal 0.5 mg. every 8 hours for agitation. There is no stop date identified. R15's EMR shows the hospice order for the PRN Risperdal was entered into the Physicians Orders with the following statement added, Do not discontinue without discussing with Hospice. A facility provided a not dated Medication Regimen Review Prescriber Recommendations shows the pharmacy had notified the facility on this form of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's splint/palm protector was in place to her left hand for 1 of 4 residents (R36) reviewed for splints/restorative care in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 5/19/25 at 10:30 AM R36 was in bed, asleep with no splint on her left hand. Again on 5/20/25 at 9:00 AM at 12:49 PM R36 was in bed with no splint on her left hand. R36's left hand is contracted in a closed fist position with her fingers pressing into her palm. On 5/20/25 at 12:55 PM V9 (Agency Certified Nursing Assistant) was asked about R36's left hand splint. V9 stated she didn't know anything about it and proceeded to take R36 out of the room in her reclining wheelchair and placed her in the dining room. On 5/21/25 at 9:32 AM V8 (Restorative Nurse) stated, I didn't know she didn't have it. It is a palm protector to keep her fingers from pressing into her palm. She takes it off with her other hand. I don't know where is was, I asked night shift to find it for me. R36's current Physician's Order Sheet shows an order dated 9/10/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietary supplements were provided for 1 of 6 residents (R22) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 18. The findings include: R22's face sheet shows she has diagnoses including dementia. R22's Weight Summary shows she weighed 116.4 pounds (lbs.) on 4/1/24 and she weighed 108.3 lbs. on 3/3/25 a 8.1 lb. 7.75% weight loss in 1 year. R22's 3/12/24 Dietary Note completed by V12 (Dietician) shows that R22 has had some weight fluctuations possibly due to dementia. The Dietary Note shows that supplements to promote higher protein and calorie consumption had been added prior to the weight change including yogurt 6 ounces with meals, skim milk three times a day with meals, double eggs at breakfast, and a new dietary supplement of peanut butter and jelly sandwiches with meals was added. On 5/19/25 the noon meal service on the 1st floor was observed. At 1:20 PM R22's meal tray was brought out to her, and staff assisted R22 to start eating and sat at the table with her. On R22's meal tray was a copy of her meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document a numerical value for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) measurements for 1 of 1 resident (R61) reviewed for intravenous (IV) access in the sample of 18. The findings include: R61's face sheet printed on 5/19/25 showed he was a [AGE] year-old male that had the diagnosis of osteomyelitis (bone infection). A facility assessment done on 4/10/25 showed R61's mental status was intact. On 5/19/25 at 12:19 PM, R61 said he was getting IV antibiotics for a bone infection through a PICC that had been removed. R61 said staff did not measure the catheter length or the circumference of his arm. R61's Medication Administration Records (MAR) for April 2025 and May 2025 showed an order to measure the catheter length of the PICC weekly from the insertion site to the tip of the cap and to call the doctor if the length changed more than 2 centimeters. Also, to measure the arm circumference weekly. The measurements were to be done on the following…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident consumed their medications when administering medications for 1 of 18 residents (R42) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 18. The findings include: R42's Care Plan with an initiated date of 4/24/24 showed R42's memory is or may be impaired. Consequently, the resident has problems with decision-making, insight, logic, calculation, reasoning, planning, and judgement. On 5/19/25 at 9:37 AM, R42 was in bed. On the bedside table was a clear medication cup with 4 pills (one white, one yellow, and two brown). R42 said he had not received his morning medications. R42 was asked about the pills on his bedside table. R42 said he was not aware there were pills sitting on his bedside table. R42 added sometimes staff will leave his medication on the bedside table for him to take later. On 5/19/25 at 10:21 AM, the pills remained on R42's bedside table. On 5/19/25 at 10:50 AM, the pills were no longer on R42's bedside table. On 5/19/25 at 11:09 AM, V5 (Registered Nurse) said he noticed the pills…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,328 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $8,328 — penalty dated 2023-11-15
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-23 for 11 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL