Dupage Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 97 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 366 beds and averages 208.8 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 157 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.17 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.29 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 17% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two staff assisted in transferring a resident safely while using a mechanical lift. This failure resulted in R2 falling from the mechanical lift to the floor, sustaining a right tibia fracture and an occipital contusion and transfer to the emergency department. This Applies to 1 of 5 residents (R2) reviewed for falls and accidents in a sample of 9. A care plan initiated on 10/30/2023 showed that R2 needs two staff members to assist with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), including transfers from bed to wheelchair and vice versa. The MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 11/22/2023, showed that R2 is cognitively intact and dependent on ADLs, requiring two or more staff members to complete activities such as transfers, dressing, personal hygiene, and bathing. A review of R2's face sheet and physician's progress notes dated 01/24/2024 showed R2 was an [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility initially on 05/01/2023 with diagnoses including muscular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents their meal trays with others seated at the same table. This applies to 6 of 9 residents (R25, R62, R116, R153, R161, and R165) observed for dining in the sample of 35. The findings include: On September 8, 2025, at 12:09 PM during lunch meal observation on the first floor, 1 (one) North dining room, several residents were noted eating their meal when others on the same table had not received their meal tray. R160 was fed by V9 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and had almost finished her meal, whereas R161 and R25 who were seated at the same table and had not received their meal trays. On a separate table in the same dining room, R68 was eating her lunch and R165 and R116 who were seated at the same table were looking on. On inquiry why R25, R116, R161, and R165 did not get their trays at the same time as other residents on the same table, V10 (Certified Nursing Restorative Aide) stated that these residents' trays are on the second cart, and it has not yet arrived. On September 8, 2025, at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to change a wound dressing as ordered by the physician and the facility failed to prepare medications per facility policy. This applies to 4 of 35 residents (R134, R165, R177, R195) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 35. The findings include:1. R134's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) states R134 is 93 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses including unspecified open wound, right lower leg, initial encounter. On September 8, 2025, at 11:25 AM, R134 was in her bedroom sitting on her wheelchair. R134's right leg was covered with elastic bandage which was stained with red and brown color discharges on the lateral area of her right leg. V23 (4th Floor Head Nurse) stated R134 has venous stasis ulcer on her right leg. On September 9, 2025, at 10:51 AM, V21 (Wound Care Nurse) rendered wound care to R134 venous stasis ulcer in the right leg. R134's Unna Boot dressing was stained with new and old dry discharge which overflowed to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a device or equipment for a resident with a limited range of motion to prevent potential further decrease in the range of motion (ROM). This applies to 1 of 8 residents (R9) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 35. The findings include:R9's Face sheet shows that R9 is 75 years-old who has multiple medical diagnoses which include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, aphasia following cerebral infarction, vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance, and weakness. MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated July 25, 2025, shows that R9 is cognitively impaired and totally dependent on staff for ADL (activities of daily living) care. On September 8, 9, and 10, from 9:30 AM through 1:30 PM, R9 was observed multiple times. R9 was in bed and non-verbal. R9's left hand noted in one position, it was slightly closed with the index and middle fingers in straight position while the ring and other fingers were bent to the joints. There was no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement feeding interventions to ensure safety for a resident (R173) while eating meals. This applies to 1 (R173) of 35 of residents reviewed for accidents and supervision in the sample of 35. The findings include:R173's electronic medical record showed R173 has diagnoses that include dementia, anxiety, retention of urine, depression, cochlear implants, and dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. R173 Minimum Data Set showed R173 to be severely cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for eating and all activities of daily living (ADL). R173's care plan dated February 11, 2025, showed that R173 has a need for hands on feeding assistance. R173 ADL care plan dated 2/26/2024 showed that R173 required purple swallow assistance- pureed diet with thick liquids, and standard swallow precaution as follows: eat only when alert, sit upright, small sips/bites, eat drink slowly.On September 8, 2025, at 11:40 AM, R173 was observed sleeping in the dining room. On September 8, 2025, at 12:37 pm observed still sleeping then V19…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to put nutrition interventions in place in a timely manner for a resident with significant weight loss.This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R14) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 35. The findings include:The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including sequelae of cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.R14's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated June 13, 2025, showed R14 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS continued to show R14 did not have a behavior of refusing care. R14's nutrition care plan dated September 26, 2023, showed [R14] has potential nutritional problem related to vascular dementia, depression, anxiety may affect meal intakes. Diagnoses sequelae of cerebral infarction, hypertension. Diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Diagnosis hypothyroidism. The care plan continued to show multiple interventions dated September 26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician order for medication administration. There were 25 medication opportunities with 2 errors, resulting to 7.69% error rate. This applies to 2 of the 8 residents (R9, R13) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 35. The finding include:1. On September 9, 2025, at 9:44 AM, V17 (Nurse) administered multiple medications to R13 including Esomeprazole via gastric tube (g-tube). The Esomeprazole cup remained with decent amount of medication residuals after V17 completed the medication administration. R13's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated September 2025 shows to give Esomeprazole 20 mg via g-tube once daily for GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease). 2. On September 9, 2025, at 1:39 PM, V18 (Nurse) administered Rifampin oral suspension to R9. The thick Rifampin liquid suspension was mixed with water when V18 administered it to R9 via g-tube. However, V18 did not give the full dose of this antibiotic because there were still residues of this medication left from the medicine…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident with a pneumococcal vaccine.This applies to 1 of 5 residents (R34) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 35. The findings include:The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed R34 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses including dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and ventricular tachycardia.R34's Pneumococcal Vaccine Consent/Declination Form showed on June 23, 2025, R34's POA (Power of Attorney) consented for R34 to receive the pneumococcal vaccine.R34's Immunization Report dated September 10, 2025, showed R34 did not receive the pneumococcal vaccine until September 9, 2025.On September 10, 2025, at 1:17 PM, V2 (DON/Director of Nursing) said R34 received the vaccine on September 9, 2025, after V5 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) started compiling the requested vaccination information, V5 saw R34 did not receive the pneumococcal vaccine so the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly label/date/seal/store items, remove expired items, and perform hand hygiene while in the facility kitchen. This applies to all residents that receive oral nutrition and foods prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: The facility's Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid (Form CMS-Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-671) dated 8/20/24 documents that the total census was 211 residents. On 8/22/24 at 1:16 PM, V39 (ADON/Assistant Director of Nursing) said there are 6 NPO (Nothing by Mouth) residents; all other residents eat from the facility kitchen. On 8/21/24 starting at 10:19 AM, V23 (Chef) was observed pureeing lunch items. After V23 pureed the chicken, she removed her gloves, pulled the garbage can out from under the counter with her bare left hand (while touching the rim of the garbage can) and threw away her gloves with her right hand. V23 then put on a new pair of gloves and did not wash her hands after touching the garbage can. V23 then put some of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to date and discard as indicated insulin vials when opened. The facility failed to store medications in their original packaging until they were administered. This applies to 8 of 8 residents reviewed (R104, R96, R160, R197, R75, R121, R146, R73) for medication storage in the sample of 37. Findings include: 1. On 8/20/2024 at 3:40 PM, V9 (RN/Registered Nurse) was asked to check the fourth floor's medication room for medication storage. V9 said R73's opened and filled Levemir insulin vial was not dated with the open date. V9 said R146's opened and filled Fiasp insulin vial was not dated with the open date. V9 said R121's opened and filled Lantus insulin vial was not dated with the open date. V9 said R75's opened and filled Fiasp and Glargine insulin vials were not dated with the open dates. V9 said insulin vials should be dated when they are opened for proper medication storage. On 8/20/2024 at 4:40 PM, V11's (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) medication cart was checked for medication storage. V11 said R197's opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) for a resident on EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) and failed to do proper hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection. This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R68, R41, R155, R364, R365) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 37. The findings include: 1. On 8/20/24 at 11:23 AM, V27 (CNA/Certified Nurse Assistant) was providing personal hygiene and incontinence care for R68. R68 was on EBP due to having a G-Tube (Gastrostomy Tube). V27 applied a gown and gloves and provided incontinence care to R68, who had stool and urine in her disposable brief. V27 wiped the urine and stool off R68, then took a new incontinence brief and applied it under R68. V27 did not change her gloves or perform hand hygiene when going from the dirty brief to the clean brief. At 11:48 AM, V27 left R68's room without removing the PPE to throw the dirty linen bag in a container in the hallway. At 11:49 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 39 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $6.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL