No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ahva Care Of Winfield

28 West 141 Liberty Street, Winfield, IL 60190 · For profit - Individual · 138 certified beds · (630) 668-9696 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (630) 668-9696 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2025
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (19) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • about 23% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
25 N Winfield Rd Ste 501 · (630) 260-0600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
111 N County Farm Rd Ste 101 · (331) 218-1362 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
238 N Gables Blvd · (469) 261-3071 · Call to confirm hours
Park
0N020 County Farm Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
0S347 Jefferson St · (630) 791-5007

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.1%13.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.2%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms91.7%54.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.5%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.6%14.3%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication30.0%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.7%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.2%20.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table77.2%21.7%17.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication21.4%2.2%1.4%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine81.8%63.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.1%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.1%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.952.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.552.221.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
13.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 13.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 43 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.0%CMS range 27.5–61.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.1–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge13.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge11.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge4.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.1–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.70
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.77
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
43.6%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 138 beds and averages 128.4 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.77 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.89 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-14)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their POA (Power of Attorney) with a bed hold notice and written documentation for the reason of transfer to the hospital.This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R1, R2, R10, R129, R138) reviewed for transfers in a sample of 30.The findings include: 1.R1's progress note dated 1/23/26 at 4:56 PM shows: NOD (Nurse on Duty) noted a change in mental status of resident during her neuro checks. (R1) appeared confused and verbalized feeling nervous. Although (R1) remained alert and orientated x 4, (R1) appeared not at her baseline behavior. Vitals shown an elevated blood pressure from baseline of BP (Blood Pressure) 158/89 and respiratory rate increased to 28 breaths per minute from baseline. Oxygen saturation rate of 98%, Temperature—98.4 F (Fahrenheit), Heart Rate—104.medical doctor notified and orders to send to ER (Emergency Room) for evaluation. Orders carried out 911 was called for ambulance. ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing), DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-14 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and provide snacks to residents at bedtime.This applies to 5 of 5 residents (R25, R65, R82, R94, R100) reviewed for bedtime snacks in a sample of 30.The findings include:R25's face sheet documents admission date of 12/28/25. Diagnoses include bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, Schizophrenia, hypertension, and peripheral vascular disease. MDS (Minimum Data Sheet) dated 4/20/26 documents he has intact cognitive functions. R65's face sheet documents admission date of 9/25/23. Diagnoses include major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, psychosis, hypertension and chronic kidney disease, stage II. MDS dated [DATE] documents she has intact cognitive functions. R82's face sheet documents admission date of 11/14/24. Diagnoses include chronic kidney disease, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, polyneuropathy, osteoarthritis, bipolar disorder, hypertension, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable water temperature in the shower. This applies to 1 resident (R82) reviewed for homelike environment in a sample of 30 residents.The findings include:On 5/13/26 at 10:07 AM, R82 said the shower in the hallway that she likes to use does not have hot water. R82 said she has mentioned it in past resident council meetings, but it has yet to be fixed. On 5/14/26 at 12:06 PM, R82 said the shower temperature has been cold for over a year. R82 said she prefers to take showers in that shower room because it is more private, but it is uncomfortable and she can't sit under the water long to enjoy it, so she tries to get in and out quickly. On 5/14/26 at 10:49 AM, V10 (Maintenance Director) said R82 told him the water was not getting hot enough in the shower, but he checked the temperature and it was okay. V10 said hot water temperatures should range between 100-110 degrees F (Fahrenheit). On 5/14/26 at 10:52 AM, V10 checked shower temperature and let the water run for 6 minutes to see how hot it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer and assist resident to participate in activities of her interest and preference.This applies to 1 of 1 residents R109 reviewed for activities in a sample of 30.Findings include:05/14/2026 at 1:53 PM, R109 stated it makes her angry not being able to participate in activities. R109 stated she likes music, trivia and would like to exercise but staff is too busy to assist her. R109 stated she can't participate in activities like bingo the staff offers to her because she is blind. R109 stated she doesn't always know what activities are available because no one reads the activity schedule to her. R109 stated there was a previous activity that staff left her in the activity area after the activity was over. R109 stated a housekeeper heard her scream and assisted her back to her room.05/13/2026 at 3:21 PM. V14 RN (Registered Nurse) stated R109 is mostly in her room sleeping.On 05/14/2026 at 11:08 AM, V9 Activities Director stated R109 likes music related activities and going outside. V9 stated activities staff see R109 every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store medications for residents who were not assessed to keep medications at bedside.This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R31, R43, R97) reviewed for medication storage in a sample of 30.The findings include: 1. On 05/12/26 at 9:55 AM, R31 had an Anoro Ellipta 62.5 mcg/25 mcg (Micrograms) on his bedside table. On 05/13/26 10:46 AM, R31 was sitting at the bedside and said he had emphysema, which he used an inhaler to treat. R31 opened his top drawer and pulled out the Anoro Ellipta inhaler. R31 said he got the inhaler from the nurse and would administer it by himself. R31's face sheet showed he was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, depression, epilepsy, cocaine abuse, delusional disorders, and chronic bronchitis. R31's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 04/14/26 showed R31 had mild cognitive impairment. R31's POS (Physician Order Sheet) did not show an order for R31 to store medications at the bedside. R31's Care Plan did not show any care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-14 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to provide built up eating utensils to support a residents independent eating.This applies to 1 or 1 residents R3 reviewed for meal assistive devices in a sample of 30.Findings include:On 05/12/2026 at 12:09 PM, during the meal observation R3 struggled to feed herself by dropping her food on her chest. R3 stated she was having a hard time handling her spoon to feed herself. R3's meal ticket list built up utensils for all meals.On 05/13/2026 at 12:18 PM, V8 CNA. (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated the meal trays are for the residents are set up by the CNAs. The CNA that prepares the meal tray and the CNA that delivers the tray to the resident are responsible to assure the tray s correct. If the resident does not have the utensils they need, they will struggle to eat their meal.On 05/13/2026 at 4:15 PM, V2 DON (Director of Nursing) stated residents are assessed by speech or occupational therapy for built up utensils. Residents are not able to eat independently if they don't have utensils when they are eating. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' right to be free from physical abuse by another resident. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for resident-to-resident abuse in the sample of 3. The findings include: 1. On June 30, 2025, at 1:10 PM, R1 was lying in bed in her room. R1 refused to discuss the altercation between R1 and R2 that occurred on June 7, 2025. The EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has multiple diagnoses including, polyneuropathy, delusional disorders, hallucinations, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, asthma, heart failure, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, paranoid personality disorder, and psychosis. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated June 23, 2025, shows R1 is cognitively intact, requires partial/moderate assistance with eating and oral hygiene, and substantial/maximal assistance with all other ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). R1 is frequently incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean and comfortable room. This applies to 4 out of 4 residents (R7, R117, R127, R130) reviewed for environment from a total sample of 30. Findings include: 1. On 2/18/25 at 11:35AM R127 was in bed covered with two comforters. R127's MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment of 12/13/2024 defines R127 as cognitively intact. R127 stated her room was always cold. R127's face-sheet shows R127 was an 80 y/o female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Schizoaffective Disorder, Hypertension, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. 2. On 2/18/25 at 11:38AAM R117 was observed in bed covered with a comforter. R117 stated her room was very cold, and it was always cold. R117 stated that she is comfortable under her blanket. R117's face-sheet showed R117 is admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Schizoaffective Disorder, Depression,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of controlled medications accordingly and have as-needed medication available for administration upon resident request. This applies to 5 out of 5 (R103, R65, R26, R10, and R73) residents reviewed for medication storage and pharmacy services in a sample of 30. The findings include: 1. On 2/18/2025 at 12:55 PM, the medication storage task was done with V15 (Registered Nurse/RN) on the second floor. R10's Ativan 0.5 mg (milligrams) medication bottle containing 20 tablets was in the medication room's refrigerator. R10's Ativan Controlled Substances Proof of Use record sheet was wrapped around the medication (not in the unit's narcotic control counting log binder). V15 said the medication did not require refrigeration and was unsure why it was stored in the refrigerator. V15 also said the record sheet had to be in the narcotic control binder to ensure the medication was being accounted for. V15 then gave R10's medication and record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the call light within access for one resident. This applies to 1 resident (R130) reviewed for accommodation of needs in a sample of 30. Findings include: On 2/18/25 at 1:13 PM, R130 was observed sitting on the side of his bed with his pants half falling off his hips and his brief sticking out of his pants. R130s call button was noted to be draped over the side of his wheelchair and out of R130's reach. R130 stated, how am I supposed to get this without falling down. R130 added that the nurse had been in the room to give him medications and did not give him the call button. R130 stated that 75% of the time the staff does not give him the call button. R130 also stated that he fell on February 12, 2025 because his button was not in reach and he was reaching for it. R130's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/13/25 shows his cognition is intact and R130 needs substantial/maximal assistance for personal hygiene. R130's care plan dated 1/7/2025 documents that R130 is at risk for falls and interventions include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 9 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate advanced directives in the residents' medical records. This applies to 3 out of 4 (R27, R76, and R47) residents reviewed for advance directives in a sample of 30. The findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 11:15 AM, V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said the facility maintained a binder with Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) advance directive forms on top of the unit's emergency crash cart. V12 also said all residents required a code status order in their EMRs (Electronic Medical Records) to reflect their selected advanced directives. V12 was asked to review R27, R47, and R76's EMRs code status. V12 said R27 and R47's EMRs showed full code orders (to be resuscitated) and R76's EMR did not show a code status order. V12 then reviewed the DNR binder which showed R27, R47, and R76 had POLST (Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment) forms indicating they had selected DNR (not to be resuscitated). V12 said the DNR binder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the POA (Power of Attorney), physician, and hospice provider in a timely manner before transferring R131 to the hospital for evaluation after a fall incident. This applies to 1 of 2 hospice residents (R131) who were reviewed for significant change in condition and hospitalization in a sample of 30. Findings include: On 02/18/2025 at 10:31 AM with V15 (Registered Nurse/RN), R131 was observed with a skin tear on the left elbow. V15 said R131 had a fall on 02/17/2025 and went to the hospital for evaluation. V15 said she was not involved in the incident and was not aware of the details. On 02/18/25 at 01:46 PM, V17(RN) said R131 had an unwitnessed fall, and the facility called 911 and transferred R131 to the hospital. V17 stated she informed later the hospice provider and the physician and forgot to notify R131's POA (Power of Attorney) R131's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) showed R131 was admitted to hospice care on 01/30/2025 due to cerebra…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the hospice physician's order for hospitalization. This applies to 1 of 2 hospice resident (R131) who was reviewed for hospitalization in a sample of 30. Findings include: Hospice provider order dated 01/30/2025 for R131 indicated do not hospitalize, call with change in condition, and comfort care only. On 02/18/25 at 01:46 PM, V17(Registered Nurse) said R131 had an unwitnessed fall, and the facility called 911 and transferred R131 to the hospital. V17 stated she informed the R131's physician later. V17 said she did not realize that R131 was not to be hospitalized . 02/19/25 V2 (Director of Nursing) said nurses should follow physician orders. R131's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) showed R131 was admitted to hospice care on 01/30/2025 due to cerebra vascular disease for comfort care only and diagnoses including cerebral infarction, protein-calorie malnutrition, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer residents who required the use of a mechanical lift. This applies to 3 out of 3 (R32, R75, R104) residents reviewed for transfers in a sample of 30. The findings include: 1. R104's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) showed his diagnoses including lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, muscle weakness in his right lower leg, gout, epilepsy, and dementia. R104's EMR said he required the use of a mechanical sit-to-stand machine lift for all transfers. R104's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/30/2025 said he was dependent on facility staff for transfers. On 2/19/2025 at 9:10 AM, V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V8 (CNA) said they were going to transfer R104 from his wheelchair to the toilet. V7 said R104 required the use of the sit-to-stand mechanical lift for transfers. V7 said R104's right lower leg was weak and required additional support. V7 and V8 then placed R104's feet on the machine's footplate.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely administer a resident's extended-release antihypertensive medication. This applies to 1 out of 3 (R92) residents reviewed for medications in a sample of 30. The findings include: On 2/19/2025 at 8:15 AM during medication administration, V16 (Registered Nurse/RN) said she was going to administer R92's scheduled antihypertensive medication, Diltiazem ER (extended-release) 120 mg (milligrams) one tablet. V16 crushed and mixed R92's Diltiazem ER tablet with applesauce. V16 then administered R92's medication orally. On 2/19/2025 at 11:00 AM, V14 (Pharmacist) said R92's Diltiazem ER was an antihypertensive medication to lower the blood pressure. V14 said the tablet should have not been crushed because it lost its extended-release properties, and the dosage would have been absorbed quicker in the body. V14 also said the medication was listed in the Do Not Crush list which was provided to the facility. R92's Order Summary Report dated 2/19/2025 showed an order for diTIAZem HCI ER Oral Tablet Extended Release…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' privacy were maintained while performing blood glucose monitoring and insulin injections. The facility also failed to ensure a resident's private medical information was kept confidential. This applies to 4 of 4 residents (R32, R65, R103 and R107) reviewed for privacy in the sample of 25. Findings include: 1. R107's face sheet showed multiple diagnoses including dementia, and diabetes mellitus. On January 8, 2024 at 10:46 AM, R107 was sleeping in a wheelchair in the hallway outside of her room. V9 (Nurse) rolled R107 to the nurses' station, used a lancet to extract blood from R107's finger and then used a blood glucose monitoring machine to determine R107's blood glucose level. During R107's blood glucose monitoring procedure, no privacy was provided to the resident and during the same procedure, R107 was visible to multiple residents and staff at the nurses' station. V9 stated she usually checks resident's lunchtime and dinnertime blood glucose at the nurses' station or wherever residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assist residents identified as needing assistance with personal hygiene. This applies to 4 of 5 residents (R86, R88, R110 and R113) reviewed for ADLs (activities of daily living) in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On January 8, 2024 at 1:02pm, R110 had facial hair up to a quarter inch in length. On January 9, 2024 at 9:47am, R110 continued to have unshaved facial hair. According to R110 the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) normally shave him with his shower or bed bath but they hadn't shaved him during his last 3 bath times. R110 stated his bath days are Wednesday and Saturday (the last being January 6, 2024). The facility provided a record of R110's baths which showed R110 did get a bath on January 6, 2024, 2 days before the January 8 observation. According to the facility face sheet for R110 shows the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and is treated for medical and psychiatric illnesses. According to the most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess and provide adaptive devices to residents, to prevent further reduction in ROM (range of motion). This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R80 and R86) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. R80 had multiple diagnoses including hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side and joint contracture, based on the face sheet. R80's quarterly MDS (minimum data set) dated November 17, 2023 showed that the resident was moderately impaired with cognition. The MDS showed that R80 had functional limitation in ROM (range of motion) on one side of both upper and lower extremities. The same MDS showed that R80 required substantial/maximal assistance to total dependence from the staff with most of her ADLs (activities of daily living). On January 8, 2024 at 11:41 AM, R80 was sitting in her wheelchair inside her room. R80's left hand was contracted with four fingers (except thumb) curled into the palm. R80 could not extend her index, middle, ring, and little fingers. R80 had no splint and/or no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed flush an intravenous (IV) line prior to administration of medication and failed to label and change an IV dressing. This applies to 2 of 2 residents (R81, R86) reviewed for intravenous line in the sample of 25. The findings include: 1. On January 8, 2024, at 5:35 PM, V6 (Registered Nurse) administered multiple medications to R86 which included Meropenem 2 gm (grams) intravenously (IV). This Meropenem was incorporated into 0.9 NS (normal saline) 100 ml (milliliter). V6 did not flush the IV line prior to administering Meropenem. On January 8, 2024, at 6:00 PM, V6 stated that they are supposed to flush the IV line before and after infusion, however, she (V6) forgot to do it. Physician order summary shows R86 has peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). Medication administration record (MAR) showed: Sodium Chloride Solution 0.9 NSS (Normal Saline Solution). Use 10 ml intravenously every day and night shift for flush. Flush double lumen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WINFIELD WOODS HEALTHCARE CENTER LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/02/2020
AHVA SOUTHWEST HOLDCO, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/02/2020
AHVA SOUTHWEST IRREVOCABLE 2020 TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/02/2020
LOPIN, NAOMIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/02/2020
LOPIN, YISROELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/02/2020
BAVER, ELANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2023
O'GORMAN, NORAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2025
SMITH, JAMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2025
AHVA WINFIELD PROPERTY, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/27/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.0M
Related-party expense23% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 91%Medicare 5%Other / private 4%

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 23% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$286per resident / day
operating cost
$8,695per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$237per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146168. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next