La Bella of Woodstock
309 McHenry Avenue, Woodstock, IL 60098 · For profit - Individual · 115 certified beds · (815) 338-1700 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (92) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $673,254 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 77.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.3% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.8% | 14.3% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.8% | 18.3% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.0% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.8% | 26.1% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.0% | 13.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.31 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.52 | 2.22 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 58% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.0%CMS range 7.7–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 80.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.3%CMS range 4.5–15.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.23 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 77.6 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.83 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.48 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.97 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
5 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
92 citations, most serious first. The 27 most serious are shown; the remaining 65 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an exit door with an audible alarm was in functional order and alerting staff when opened, and failed to ensure a resident with severe cognitive impairment and increased confusion was appropriately assessed and supervised to prevent elopement for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for elopement in the sample of 13. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 10/22/24 when R1 could not be located in the facility. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 11/8/24 at 8:20 AM. This surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the immediacy was removed on 11/8/24, but noncompliance remains at Level two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. The findings include: R1's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, COPD, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and cerebral infarction. R1's Final…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
I. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure female residents were protected from sexual abuse by male residents. This resulted in R4 placing his penis on R11's knee and telling her to touch it on 5/26/24, and R18 touching R21's breast on 7/5/24, R17's breast on 7/5/24 and R1's breast on 7/7/24. This applies to 6 of 14 residents (R1, R4, R11, R17, R18, R21) reviewed for sexual abuse in the sample of 22. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/26/24 when R4 placed his penis on R11's leg and told her to touch it. V1 (Assistant Administrator), V2 (Director of Nursing) and V20 (Corporate Nurse) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 7/10/24 at 11:35 AM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 7/10/24, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training. The findings include: 1. On 7/3/24 at 9:55 AM V3 (Registered Nurse/RN) stated, I heard that he (R4) was being inappropriate with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide supervision for R12, a severely cognitively impaired resident and failed to provide progressive intentions to address R12's exit seeking behavior. This failure resulted in R12 exiting the building on 6/27/24 around 4:15 PM, walking across a small gravel area to the end of a driveway (approximately 75 feet) and attempting to step onto the street, a two lane highway with a speed limit of 30 mph. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R12) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 22. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 6/24/24 when R12 first exited the facility without staff supervision. V20 (Corporate Nurse), V1 (Assistant Administrator) and V2 (Director of Nursing) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 7/10/24 at 11:50 AM. The surveyor confirmed by observation and interview that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 7/10/24, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview and record review the facility failed to safely transfer a resident. This failure resulted in R3 sustaining an ankle fracture that required surgical repair. This applies to one of three residents (R3) reviewed for safety in the sample of three.The findings include:The facility face sheet for R3 shows she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include but not limited to Stage 5 kidney disease, Type 2 Diabetes, and other specified disorders of bone density. The facility assessment dated [DATE] shows R3 to be cognitively intact and requires maximum assistance from staff with transfers from bed to chair.A facility reported incident report dated 6/4/26 shows R3 was being assisted out of bed by a staff CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and when R3 stood up from her bed her legs became weak, and she twisted her left ankle, and the CNA lowered her to the floor. The report shows R3 was sent to the local hospital where it was discovered she had sustained a fracture on her left ankle. R3 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was not neglected from receiving nutrition, hydration and medications to manage medical symptoms. This failure resulted in R1 developing severe dehydration, sepsis and acute renal failure requiring hospitalization on 5/30/26. This applies to 1 of 9 residents (R1) reviewed for neglect in the sample of 9. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, Muscle Weakness, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Acute Cystitis with Hematuria and Metabolic Encephalopathy.R1's Care Plan dated 5/27/26 shows that R1 has Imbalanced nutrition: Less than body requirements, related to lack of knowledge and inadequate food intake.R1's Hospital Notes dated 5/4/26 state, Discharge to Sub Acute Rehab: benefit from high frequency therapeutic program, demonstrating high level of burden on primary caregiver, demonstrating decline from prior level of functioning,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify a resident's pressure injury prior to an advanced stage. This failure resulted in R1 being identified with a DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) to his bilateral buttocks on 5/20/26. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pressure injuries in a sample of 9. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, Muscle Weakness, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Acute Cystitis with Hematuria and Metabolic Encephalopathy. R1's Skin and Wound Note dated 5/13/26 written by V9 (Wound Nurse Practitioner) states, No wounds. On 6/9/26 at 9:44AM V2 (Assistant Director of Nursing) stated, He is not here anymore. It started with a DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) to his left buttocks. I put an assessment in wound rounds. He was not eating or drinking. Had a low air loss mattress. It was added the day we found the DTI. He was agitated and resistant to care. R1's Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-06-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic medication order was transcribed to the medication administration record. This failure resulted in R1 not receiving the medication for the purpose of managing R1's behaviors and improving his quality of life. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for significant medication errors in the sample of 9. The findings include: R1's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Hypertension, Muscle Weakness, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Acute Cystitis with Hematuria and Metabolic Encephalopathy.R1's Progress Note written by the Psychiatric Nurse Practitioner dated 5/22/26 states, Patient is noncompliant with oral medications, limiting effectiveness of current PO regimen. Initiate ZyPREXA (olanzapine- an antipsychotic) 5 mg (milligrams) IM (intramuscularly) every 8 hours PRN (as needed) for anxiety/agitation for 7 days. Continue behavioral interventions including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review that facility failed to have fall prevention interventions in place for a resident at risk for fall. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 7. This failure resulted in R1 slipping out of his high back wheelchair and sustaining a left femur fracture.The findings include:R4's Face Sheet shows diagnoses of end stage renal disease and dependance on dialysis, acquired absence of right leg-below the knee, osteoporosis, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, anxiety, dementia and Alzheimer's disease.R4's Hospital admission History and Physical dated 3/6/26 shows, Patient reportedly had a fall at the facility yesterday, however it is unclear if any evaluation was performed afterwards. He was sent for his scheduled dialysis session this morning where he appeared agitated and pointed to his left leg-appeared uncomfortable. Dialysis staff directed patient to the ER for further evaluation. XR (Xray) left femur with minimally displaced fracture of the distal femoral metadiaphysis.Patient to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2026-01-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide R3, a resident assessed to have a high level of pain, with pain medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for pain in the sample of 15. This failure allowed R3's pain from a traumatic rib fracture go untreated in the facility from 1:00PM to 6:49PM. The findings include: On 01/26/2026 at 11:30AM, On 01/26/2026 R3 was not in the facility. On 01/26/2026 at 9:23AM, R3 said, I fell at home. I was discharged from the hospital with multiple rib fractures. I was using intravenous hydromorphone in the hospital to control the pain. I was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation and pain control. I had pain 20 out of 10. I waited 7.5 hours to get a pain pill. The facility had pain medication available but something about the rules would not allow them to treat me. I was in a lot of pain. I could not even open the door to the room I hurt so bad. I called my friend to pick me up and left. The nurse said I was leaving against their will. What WILL? I had no idea what their will was, no one saw me. V3 RN-Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of mental abuse for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 suffering undue, ongoing anxiety and contributed to his leaving the facility and made R2 feel badly. The findings include: On 4/29/25 at 10:17 AM, R1 said he has lived in the facility for over two years but is transferring to another facility later today due to the abusive environment. R1 said on one particular Sunday, V3, Regional Director of Operations/Former Administrator, came into the facility, rounded up all of the staff and lined them up in the hall. R1 said V3 began to walk up and down the line of employees yelling at them and pointing his finger at them. R1 said V3 was reprimanding these adults, these professionals and it was terrible, demeaning, and unprofessional. R1 said he felt upset and intimidated. R1 said the incident upset him immensely, and he was totally and completely stressed out. R1 said V3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident that was on an oral anticoagulant medication (blood thinner) was free from physical abuse. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R12, R13) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 15. This failure resulted in R12 complaining of 5/10 sharp pain to right parietal and temporal area during head examination. The findings include: 1. The facility's Final Abuse Investigation dated 3/18/25 documents on 3/16/25, (R12) reported that (R13) allegedly hit her on the head (R12) reported that she was backing out of the common area with her wheelchair and mistakenly ran into (R13) and (R13) hit her. R13's face sheet shows R13 is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnosis including bipolar, paranoid schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified mood (affective) disorder, anxiety, disorders of and psychosocial development. R12's progress notes printed 3/18/25 at 3:16pm in part documents diagnosis of chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietitian recommendations for an increased tube feeding order were carried out. This failure resulted in R8 experiencing a significant weight loss of 13.9% in 6 months. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R8) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 15. The findings include: R8's Face sheet dated 3/18/25 shows R8 has diagnoses that include but are not limited to: dysphagia following cerebral infarction, acute metabolic acidosis, and abnormal weight loss. On 3/17/25 at 12:23 PM, R8 was lying in bed with the head of bed elevated approximately 30 degrees. R8 was not receiving a bolus feed at that time. R8 showed some signs of muscle wasting on his collar bones and cheeks. R8 was unable to make his needs known verbally but was able and willing to provide a thumb up for a yes and a thumb down for a no. When asked if they provided a bolus feed via syringe through his percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube two times that day, the resident gave a thumbs up. R8's Weights and Vitals Summary dated 3/18/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hot liquids are served in a safe manner and failed to ensure 1 of 7 residents (R1) in the sample of 7 reviewed for safety and supervision was supervised and assisted while drinking hot coffee. These failures resulted in R1 spilling coffee on herself and sustaining second degree burns to her thighs. The findings include: The Facility Data Sheet dated 2/5/25 shows the facility has 76 residents in residing in the facility. On 2/5/25 at 9:24 AM, R1 said she was drinking coffee out of a Styrofoam cup and somehow the coffee got out of her hand and spilled on her upper thighs and it was really hot. R1 said no one (staff) was in the dining room and she yelled for help. R1 said someone eventually came and a nurse looked at her thighs. R1 said she was sent to the hospital and returned later the same day. R1 said she has been receiving treatment to her burns every day since then. On 2/5/25 at 10:56 AM, R3 said he was in the dining room at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident (R3) was free of physical abuse by a resident (R4) with known aggressive and verbal behaviors. This failure resulted in R3 not feeling safe in the facility. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R3, R4, R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 11. This failure resulted in R3 experiencing pain and fearfulness. The findings include: On 11/6/24 at 9:25 AM, R4 was seen self-ambulating in R4's room and throughout the 100 unit hallway. R4's room is directly across the hallway from R3's room. R3 was seen in R3's room in R3's wheelchair. On 11/6/24 at 10:44 AM, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant- CNA) said R4 is frequently confused related to a diagnosis of dementia and that R4 wanders the facility. V12 also said R4 has a history of being aggressive in the evenings towards both staff and residents. V12 said R4's aggression has slowly escalated through time and has gotten worse. R4's Care Plan focus initiated on 4/29/24 states, [R4] has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2024-07-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the facility was administered in a manner to protect the health and well-being of the residents who reside in the facility. This applies to 7 of 22 residents (R1, R4, R11, R12, R17, R17, R21) reviewed for administration in the sample of 22. The findings include: The IDPH (Illinois Department of Public Health) Facility Data Sheet filled out and signed by V1 (Assistant Administrator) dated 7/3/24 lists V25 as the facility Administrator. On 7/11/24, the facility provided a copy of V25's license showing he is a Licensed Nursing Home Administrator. On 7/8/24 at 4:15 PM, V25 introduced himself to Surveyor for the first time. (Survey Entrance date 7/3/24). V25 stated, I am here every Monday. I have another facility that I own. We had the opportunity to take this place over when they had some problems. Surveyor explained that there were some very serious concerns in the survey so far. V25 said, These are just allegations, not substantiated allegations. Did you see the tape on the wall in the dining room? We…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's safety when in bed and failed to put interventions in place to protect a resident from injury. This failure resulted in R27 sustaining a fractured right ankle on 3/2/24. The facility also failed to ensure a resident ordered to have nectar thick liquids was not given thin liquids, failed to assess a resident for safety when smoking, and failed to ensure that medical equipment was not plugged into power strips in 3 resident rooms. This applies to 6 of 18 residents (R27, R30, R75, R38, R4 & R17) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. The facility's undated initial incident report for R27 states, On 3/2/2024, at approximately 7:00 PM, (R27) was in her room in her Broda chair resting comfortably, no agitation or discomfort noted by staff. When the CNA (V19) came into the room shortly after to render care, noted (R27) on the floor next to her bed. The nurse (V18) was immediately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-04-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to keep an indwelling urinary catheter bag below the level of the bladder, clean the end to the drain on the catheter bag, and ensure a secure device was in place for 3 of 3 residents (R59, R22, & R6) reviewed for catheters in the sample of 19. This failure resulted in R59 sustaining trauma to the tip of his penis. The findings include: 1. On 4/12/23 at 9:10 AM, R59 was sitting up in bed and had a urinary catheter drainage bag attached to the lower side of his bed. R59 stated V11 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) had just recently started putting an anchor on the catheter tubing. R59 stated he doesn't want his catheter to get pulled out on accident. On 4/12/23 at 9:30 AM, V11 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated R59 has had urogenital damage because the tape that was supposed to secure the catheter tubing kept pulling and coming off. V11 stated it didn't stick to R59's skin like it should. V11 stated the secure tape for the catheter tubing was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff change their gloves during food service after coming in contact with potentially dirty objects/areas to prevent cross contamination. This has the potential to affect all 73 residents in the facility. The findings include: On 6/9/26 at 11:40AM V5 (Head Cook) was checking food temps with a thermometer at the steam table in the kitchen. V5 was wearing gloves. V5 reached up and touched his glasses with his gloved hand and then continued to check temperatures. V5 then rubbed the side of his nose, opened the service window door, and rubbed his eye wearing the same gloves. Without changing his gloves V5 then started stacking plates and bowls onto the counter getting ready for service. V5 was speaking to Surveyor and resting his gloved hand on the top plate. V5 picked up his notebook used for collecting food temperatures and put his notebook back in the pocket of his apron. V5 then touched his glasses again. Without removing the gloves V5 began serving the noon meal. V4(Dietary Manager) asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered, at ordered times for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R3) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 6.The findings include:1. On 5/27/26 at 11:42 AM, R1 said he can recall receiving his meds very late last week. It was after 12PM when he finally got his morning medications. R1 said the nurse that was working was not on time giving his meds. Review of R1's Physician Order Sheet (POS) shows an order of: Valproic Acid Oral Capsule 250 mg (milligrams), Give 500 mg by mouth three times a day for seizures Take 2 capsules (250 x2=500mg) to be given at 9AM, 1PM and 2100 (9PM); Clonazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 mg, Give 0.5 mg by mouth two times a day for anxiety/ aggression to be given at 8AM and 4PM.Review of R1's Medication Administration Audit report shows that on 5/18/26, the morning dose of Valproic Acid that was supposed to be given at 9AM was given to R1 at 12:42 PM (more than 3 hours late).R1's morning dose of Clonazepam that was supposed to be given at 8AM, was given to R1 at 12:44 PM (more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered, at ordered times for 4 of 7 residents (R4, R5, R6 and R2) reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 7.The findings include:1.On 5/15/26 at 8:55 AM, R4 was in her room sitting in her wheelchair. R4 said she wants to take her medications on time. Review of R4's Medication Administration Audit report show an order of:Duloxetine delayed release 30 mg two times a day for depression, with the morning dose to be given at 8AM. On 5/11/26 the morning dose was given at 11:42 AM.Furosemide 20 mg two times a day (diuretic) with the morning dose to be given at 8AM. On 5/11/26, the morning dose was given at 11:42 AM.Midodrine 5 mg BID for hypotension with the morning dose to be given at 8AM. On 5/11/26 the morning dose was given at 13:28 (1:28 PM)Eliquis 5 mg two times a day for a fib (abnormal heart rate) with morning dose to be given at 9AM. On 5/11/26 the morning dose was given at 11:42 AM.Azelastine nasal spray 2 spray in both nostrils two times a day, with morning dose to be given 9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow R6's Menu Preferences for 1 of 8 residents (R6) reviewed for dietary in the sample of 8.The findings include: On 05/05/2026 at 12:30PM, R6 was eating the noon meal. R6 did not have any yogurt during the noon meal.On 05/05/2026 at 11:51AM, R6 said, I did not get any yogurt for breakfast. I was told there was no yogurt on the delivery truck. I was served yogurt last Thursday night (04/30/2026). Many excuses, the most common is, The truck comes on Monday. Yogurt was added to my diet menu a month ago during my care plan meeting. On 05/05/2026 at 12:43PM, V8 Dietary Manager said, we are out of yogurt. Yogurt was added to R6's Menu Preference during the Care Plan meeting a month ago. I ordered the yogurt for R6; the yogurt is gone within one day. This is the second time R6 has not gotten yogurt. R6's Dietary Card dated 05/05/2026 at Lunch shows, Regular Diet, Regular texture, yogurt at all meals.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's environmental noise was at a comfortable level. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R5-R7) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 11. The findings include: On 4/27/26 at 10:48 AM, R5's TV sound was heard loudly from the nurse's station. At 1:49 PM, R5's door was open, a sign posted on the door, Do Not Shut Door. R5's TV volume was excessively loud it was heard from the end of the hallway. On 4/27/26 at 1:50 PM, R6 was in her room with the door closed. R5's TV was heard across the hall with the door closed. R6 said R5 always has her TV on loud. They say it's her right to have it loud. R6 said R5's loud is disruptive at night when she is trying to sleep. R6 said it's been an issue for a while and affects other residents on this hall. On 4/27/26 at 2:09 PM, R7's room was located one door down from R5. R5's TV was heard loudly from R7's room with her door shut. R7 said the lady next door (R5) has her TV really loud at night especially. R5 turns it down for a little bit and then turns the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse for 4 of 4 residents (R1,R2,R3,R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 4. Findings include:1. On 04/16/2026 R1's at 9:30AM, R1 was lying in his bed in his room. At 1:05PM, R2 was lying in his bed in his room. On 04/16/2026 at 9:30AM, R1 said, on 03/28/2026 I was sitting in my wheelchair in the hallway when R2 said, get out of my way, I am going to kick your ass. He threatened me and there was a scuffle. We threw some punches; I was hit with a coffee cup. A couple days later (03/30/2026) I went down to a community area to sit with my buddies. V3 RN-Registered Nurse started making a fuss. R2 heard V3. R2 came out of his room and started another fight with me. R2 was in his room; R2 came out when the nurse started a big commotion asking me to leave.On 04/16/2026 at 10:09AM, V1 Administrator said, R2 pushed R1's wheelchair with his foot. R2 was attempting to move R1's wheelchair out of the way. R2 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of verbal and mental abuse for 2 of 5 residents (R1 and R2) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 7. The findings include:1. On 3/30/26 at 9:20 AM, R1 said that last week a black male Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) came into the room around 5:55 AM to provide care to R2. R1 said that the CNA left the room door open. R1 said that he sat up in bed and told the CNA that the door needed to be closed and the CNA responded that he does not close the doors when he is providing care because he is working. R1 said that he then said to the CNA, I could make a complaint to the state and the CNA responded, Do what you have to do mother f*er. R1 said that he then got up from bed, closed the door and went to the bathroom. R1 said that morning, he told V3 (Activity Director) what had happened. On 3/30/26 at 2:30 PM, R2 said that last week he was receiving incontinence care from a CNA when R1 and the CNA started to argue about the door…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received timely medical treatment of a fractured leg that was sustained from a fall for 1 of 3 residents (R4) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 7. The findings include:R4's Face Sheet shows diagnoses of end stage renal disease and dependance on dialysis, acquired absence of right leg-below the knee, osteoporosis, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, anxiety, dementia and Alzheimer's disease.R4's Hospital admission History and Physical dated 3/6/26 shows, Patient reportedly had a fall at the facility yesterday, however it is unclear if any evaluation was performed afterwards. He was sent for his scheduled dialysis session this morning where he appeared agitated and pointed to his left leg-appeared uncomfortable. Dialysis staff directed patient to the ER (emergency room) for further evaluation. XR (Xray) left femur with minimally displaced fracture of the distal femoral metadiaphysis.Patient to be kept n.p.o (nothing by mouth) in anticipation of internal fixation procedure per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who receives continuous oxygen was provided oxygen services during transportation to an outpatient procedure. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for oxygen services in the sample of 9.The findings include: R3's Facesheet dated 2/11/26 shows R3 has diagnoses including, but not limited to: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and dementia. On 2/11/26 at 10:32 AM, R3 was seen lying in bed with a nasal canula adorned and the oxygen concentrator supplying oxygen at a rate of 2 liters per minute.R3's Health Status Note from 1/23/26 at 2:49 PM, by V11 (Nurse Practitioner) shows R3 receives chronic 2L (liters) [oxygen] N/C (nasal canula) for COPD.On 2/17/26 at 8:17 AM, V13 (Receptionist/Transportation Coordinator) called R3's insurance company to confirm the information provided at the time R3's transportation services were requested. On the phone, V17 (Insurance Representative) confirmed that V13 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure grievances were recorded, investigated, summarized, confirmed or not confirmed for 2 of 3 residents (R1,R11) reviewed for grievances in the sample of 15. The findings include:On 01/26/2026 at 10:00AM, R1 was lying in bed on her back. R1's left, and right arms were contracted close to the body. At 2:33PM, R11 was lying in bed on her back. R1's MDS-Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] shows, R1 is cognitively intact, with impairment to left and right upper and left and right lower extremities. R1 needs extensive assistance from staff to total dependence on staff for all ADLs-Activities of Daily Living. R11's MDS dated [DATE] shows, R11 is cognitively intact, with upper extremity impairment on both sides, lower extremity impairment on both sides. R11 needs partial assist, extensive assist, and is also dependent on staff for ADLs. R1 and R11 need to be supervised when eating. On 01/26/26 at 10:00AM, R1 said, (V5 CNA-Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 65 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' non-invasive ventilation machine Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) masks fit securely on residents faces to provide the prescribed treatment for their obstructive sleep apnea for 2 of 3 residents (R1, R2) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 4.The findings include:1.R1's physician order dated 12/12/25 showed an order for R1 to be placed on CPAP at night when sleeping due to his diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. On 1/20/26 at 8:54 AM, R1 was awake, lying in bed. A CPAP machine with attached tubing and face mask was noted on a table by the foot of R1's bed. The CPAP machine and equipment appeared clean and unused. R1 stated he had not used his CPAP at night for months because the mask doesn't fit. It leaks air and blows into my eyes. R1 stated he told nursing and a pulmonology nurse practitioner about his ill-fitting mask, but nothing had been done about it. R1's Health Status note dated 12/10/25 showed R1 was seen and examined by V5 Nurse Practitioner (NP). The note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff wore a beard guard/net while handling/serving food. This has the potential to affect all 73 residents in the facility.The findings include: The facility's Facility Data Sheet dated 12/19/25 shows 73 residents reside in the facility.On 12/19/25 as the lunch meal was being served/plated in the dining room at 12:08 PM, V15, Cook, was observed to have a beard and was not wearing a beard guard as he plated the residents' meals.On 12/19/25 at 12:30 PM, V4, Dietary Manager, stated a beard guard is required if the (facial) hair is more than an inch long. The facility's Dietary Policies and Procedures Dress Code Policy (not dated) shows beard nets should be used for employees with facial hair.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had privacy during personal activities of daily living for 1 of 4 residents (R2) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 4. The findings include:On 12/19/25 at 8:44 AM, R2 said about a week and a half ago she was getting ready to get up and V3, Maintenance Director, told V6 and V7, Housekeeping, to do a deep cleaning of her room. R2 said the three of them all said she was getting up, but V3 told them to do it anyways. R2 said they closed the curtains while the CNA (certified nursing assistant), V8, was getting her ready (cleaned and dressed), but she still felt uncomfortable. R2 said V6 said R2 is getting up and asked if they could wait until she was done, but V3 said to do it anyway. R2 said she contacted the Ombudsman and asked him to file a formal complaint.On 12/19/25 at 9:58 AM, V6 said they clean residents' rooms when residents are in there, but they absolutely do not clean while residents are getting personal cares. V6 said about two weeks ago, V3 told her to clean a resident room. V6 said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene after touching their face/nose and handling resident food for 1 of 4 residents (R4) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 4.The findings include: On 12/19/25 at 12:22 PM, V11, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was sitting in the dining room feeding R4. V11 had her left hand over her mouth, resting her head on her left hand as she was feeding R4. V11 then rubbed her hands together and ran them over her nose. R4 asked for more bread and V11 went to the serving counter and got more garlic bread and brought it to R4. V11 did not wash her hands or perform hand hygiene before delivering the bread to R4.On 12/29/25 at 12:44 PM, V4, Dietary Manager, stated staff should not touch their face/nose and deliver food to the resident without washing or sanitizing their hands first; it's not sanitary.The facility's Hand Washing Policy (not dated) shows staff should wash their hands before handling food. Staff should wash hands to remove contamination after touching bare human…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-25 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation for one of four residents (R2) reviewed for misappropriation in the sample of four. This past noncompliance occurred from August 14, 2025-August 14, 2025.Findings include:R2's admission Record dated August 25, 2025, shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder.R2's Care Plan initiated July 17, 2025, shows R2 is functioning at an independent level in his leisure pursuits. He is alert, oriented and able to express his needs, desires, and opinions. R1's admission Record dated August 25, 2025, shows she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes mellites II, syphilis, adjustment disorder, schizophrenia, ataxia, and depression.R1's Care Plan initiated August 15, 2024, shows R1 displays behavioral symptoms that are manifested by always asking peers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R11) was free from restraints. This applies to 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for restraints in the sample of 11.The findings include:R11's electronic face sheet printed on 8/6/25 showed R11 has diagnoses including but not limited to chronic respiratory failure, heart failure, history of falls, bipolar disorder, and unsteadiness on feet.R11's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R11 has moderate cognitive impairment and does not utilize restraints.On 8/6/25 at 12:15PM, V12 (Licensed Practical Nurse) assisted R11 into his bed and put the half side rail down on the left side of the bed. (The bed rail is positioned so it covers the middle of the bed and R11's bed is pushed against the wall on the right side).On 8/6/25 at 12:17PM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) stated, We always put the siderail down for (R11) to help with positioning and so he knows to ask for help to get up. If he did try to get up, he would have to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 residents (R8,R11) had fall prevention measures in place. This applies to 2 of 3 resident's reviewed for fall prevention in the sample of 11.The findings include:1) R8's electronic face sheet printed on 8/6/25 showed R8 has diagnoses including but not limited to metabolic encephalopathy, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, restlessness and agitation, and major depressive disorder.R8's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R8 has severe cognitive impairment, has not had any falls since admission to the facility, and does not utilize alarms while in her bed or chair.R8's fall risk assessment dated [DATE] showed R8 is a high fall risk.The facility's Incident Report Log as of 8/5/25 showed R8 has experienced 11 falls within the past 3 months at the facility.On 8/5/25 at 12:53PM, R8 was in her bed laying on her right-side sleeping. R8's alarm clip was hanging on the mattress next to her bed on the floor and was not clipped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have evidence that R4's alleged allegations were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 6 residents (R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. The findings include:On 07/23/2025 at 12:22PM, R4 was lying in bed on his left side with eyes closed. On 07/23/2025 at 12:22PM, R4 said, the staff have been giving me a hard time when I call for help. I went to the bathroom; the staff gave me a hard time due to them getting off work soon. I told the administrator. V5 CNA's-Certified Nursing Assistant told me she did not want to come in my room to provide care. I told her to shut her mouth. She started walking down the hallway cussing. I watch the security video with the administrator yesterday. It showed V5 CNA walking down the hallway. The video did not have sound at the time, V1 may not have turned the volume on.On 07/23/2025 at 12:30PM, V1 Administrator was not in the facility.On 07/28/2025 at 8:37AM, V1 Administrator said, I will call you back. On 07/28/2025 at 11:19AM, V4 Nurse Consultant said, V1 Administrator has been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure R1 did not leave the facility unsupervised, this applies to 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for supervision in the sample of 6.The findings include: R1'S Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] shows, R1 has a moderate cognitive impairment. On 07/23/2025 at 9:00AM, R1 was lying in bed. R1 sat up on the side of the bed. R1 then moved her wheelchair into position, engaged the left and right brake, stood to her feet, and sat herself down in the wheelchair. On 07/23/2025 at 9:00AM, R1 said, I can move myself in my wheelchair using my arms and legs. I am not able to move quickly. On 07/23/2025 at 11:30AM, V4 Nurse Consultant said, after R1 was found outside we initiated 1:1 monitoring and then applied a bracelet to her arm. When R1 gets close to the doors that lead outside an alarm will go off. On 07/23/2025 at 12:53PM, V2 DON-Director of Nursing said, the front door alarm went off around 9:30PM. There is no receptionist at the front door during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's funds were safeguarded and free from misappropriation. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R4, R5) reviewed for misappropriation in the sample of 5. The findings include:(1.) R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], shows that R4 is cognitively intact.On 7/14/25 at 9:06 AM, R4's bedside drawer had a latch attached, allowing the top drawer to be locked by a pad lock. There was not a pad lock on the drawer at this time. The back panel of R4's bedside drawer was originally fastened with nails. However, at this time, the back panel of R4's bedside drawer was still half off, allowing access into R4's bedside drawer through the back. On 7/14/25 at 9:06 AM, R4 said after returning from a day out on pass with family on a Saturday in June, R4 noticed that R4's bedside drawer had been pulled away from the wall and a plastic shoebox containing compact discs and a compact disc player was on the floor behind the bedside drawer. R4 thought nothing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R4, R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 5. The findings include:(1.) On 7/14/25 at 12:00 PM, R1 said approximately three months ago, R1 lost his wallet in the facility. R1 stated the facility found the wallet in laundry, but when it was returned, R1 noticed there was a $100 bill missing from inside the wallet. Nothing else was removed or misplaced from R1's wallet. R1 said everybody knew the money was missing, including V10 (Social Services Director). R4 requested the facility to not contact the local police or R4's husband regarding the missing money.On 7/14/25 at 1:38 PM, V1 (Administrator) said he believes the incident regarding R1's lost money and wallet happened prior to V1 started working at the facility in April. V1 said V1 heard about the incident a few weeks ago when V1 heard staff talking about the incident in the hallway. V1 states he spoke with R1 and laundry employees, but V1 never completed a formal investigation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of misappropriation were thoroughly investigated. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R1, R4, R5) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 5. The findings include:(1.) On 7/14/25 at 12:00 PM, R1 said approximately three months ago, R1 lost R1's wallet. R1 said it was later found in the laundry and was returned to R1, but was missing a $100 bill. R1 notified staff of the missing money, but R1 said R1 has not been reimbursed for the missing money. Facility resident council minutes for April 2025 shows that a resident mentioned they were missing money during laundry. The resident council minutes also show that R1 was in attendance for the April meeting. (2.) On 7/14/25 at 9:06 AM, R4 said after returning from a day out on pass with family on a Saturday in June, R4 noticed that R4's bedside drawer had been pulled away from the wall and a plastic shoebox containing compact discs and a compact disc player was on the floor behind the bedside drawer. R4 thought nothing of it that evening and asked staff to help pick up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred safely using a mechanical lift for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety in the sample of 5.The findings include:On 7/14/25 at 10:05 AM, R1 was sitting in his wheelchair in the dining room. R1 had a raised discolored area on his right posterior forearm. R1 said that he had a fall while being transferred from his bed to the wheelchair with a mechanical lift. R1 said that there was only one aide in the room when he fell. R1 said that the lift tipped over and landed on the aide. R1 said that he went to the hospital right afterwards and got an X-ray of his right arm and a scan of his head. R1's Nurse Practitioner Note dated 7/1/25 at 11:40 AM shows, Patient seen and examined today per nursing request for a witnessed fall. Per CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), patient being lifted by Hoyer (mechanical) lift then sling tipped to the side and patient fell on the floor. DON (Director of Nursing) reports patient had loss of consciousness and awoke only after stimuli, shaking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's needs were accommodated by not assisting a resident with obtaining a replacement motorized wheelchair for one of five residents (R1) reviewed for accommodation of needs in the sample of five.The findings include:R1's admission Record shows he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, restless legs syndrome, nicotine dependence (cigarettes), and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of right lower extremity.R1's Care Plan revised on January 11, 2025 shows R1 has been noted with behaviors of self-propelling his wheel chair backwards in order to get to his destinations. R1's Care Plan initiated November 18, 2024, shows R1 has limited physical mobility, the resident is non weight bearing and provide supportive care, assistance with mobility as needed, and document assistance as needed. R1's provider visit note done…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-04 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an as needed psychotropic medication order had a stop date for 4 of 5 residents (R49,R175,R16,R54) reviewed for chemical restraints in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1.R49 Physician's Order shows, lorazepam 0.5 milligram give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for anxiety. Start date 04/28/2025, no stop date or duration provided. 2.R175 Physician's Order shows, lorazepam 1 milligram give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety/restlessness/agitation. Start 05/22/2025, no stop date or duration provided. 3. R54's Face Sheet printed on 6/3/25 showed R54 had a diagnosis of anxiety. R54's Order Summary Report printed on 6/3/25 showed an order for lorazepam (anxiety psychotropic medication) to be given as needed. The order had a start date of 5/13/25. There was no duration or stop date for the medication. 4. R16's Face Sheet printed on 6/3/25 showed R16 had a diagnosis of anxiety. R16's Order Summary Report showed an order for lorazepam to be given as needed. The order had a start date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity while being fed for 1 of 20 residents (R41) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 20. The findings include: On 6/2/25 at 11:49 AM, V11, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was standing up feeding R41 lunch in the dining room. On 6/3/25 at 12:37 PM, V2, Director of Nursing (DON), said when staff is feeding a resident, they should sit down with the resident at eye level and have a conversation with the resident. V2 said it's important to provide social interaction and make the interaction more pleasant. The facility's Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity During Mealtimes Policy (implemented 5/2025) shows it is the practice of the facility to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner that enhances her quality of life. All staff members involved in providing feeding assistance to residents promote and maintain resident dignity during mealtimes. All staff will be seated while feeding a resident.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents fingernails were clean and trimmed for 2 of 20 residents (R47, R27) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living care in the sample of 20. The findings include: 1.) On 06/02/25 at 1:34PM, R47 was sitting in the hall. R47 had scratches to his forehead, right eye orbit, and left temple area. R47's right middle, ring, and small fingers was contracted. R47's fingernails extended past the tip of his fingers. On 06/02/25 at 1:34PM, R47 was asked, do you like your fingernails long? R47 responded, No. On 06/02/25 at 1:40 PM, V10 CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant said, when R47 becomes anxious he tends to scratch himself, he has scratches all over his body. R47's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], shows, R47 is dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Staff does all of the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. 2.) On 6/2/25 at 9:45 AM, and again on 6/3/25 at 8:58 AM, R27 was observed and had very long nails with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with congestive heart failure (CHF) had weights done as ordered for 1 of 2 residents (R14) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 20. The findings include: R14's Face Sheet printed on 6/3/25 listed heart failure as a diagnosis. R14's Physician Progress Note dated 5/25/25 showed R14, .suffers from congestive heart failure. The same note showed R14 had no worsening of lower extremity edema. On 06/02/25 at 11:12 AM, R14 was sitting at the edge of the bed. R14's pant legs ended mid shin. R14 did not have socks on and was wearing slippers. R14 had what appeared to be edema to both legs. R14's Order Summary Report printed on 06/03/25 showed an order for daily weights and to notify the health care provider if there was an increase of more than two pounds and the weights were being done for edema. The order had a start date of 5/5/25. R23's Medication Administration Record for May 2025 showed a recorded weight on 5/6/25, 5/20/25, and 5/27/25. R23's Monthly Weight Report printed on 6/3/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure relieving interventions were in place for a resident at risk for pressure injuries for 1 of 2 residents (R54) reviewed for pressure injuries in the sample of 20. The findings include: R54's Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Score Risk done on 04/11/25 showed R54 was at risk for developing pressure injuries. R54's Order Summary Report printed on 6/3/25 showed an order for and air mattress while in bed. On 06/02/25 at 09:12 AM and at 2:05 PM, R54 was in bed. Hanging on the foot of the bed was an air mattress pump. The power switch was not lit up and in the off position. On 06/03/25 at 08:13 AM and at 11:47 AM, R54 was in bed. Hanging on the foot of the bed was air mattress pump. The power switch was not lit up and in the off position. On 06/03/25 at 11:56 AM, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was asked by the survey if R54's air mattress pump was on. V13 looked at R54's pump and said the air mattress pump was off. V13 said the air mattress pump is an intervention to help prevent pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify and assess a resident's contracted left hand. The facility also failed to ensure a resident's wheelchair was the appropriate fit to allow him to sit comfortably in the chair. This applies to 1 of 6 residents (R37) reviewed for range of motion and mobility in a sample of 20. The findings include: On 6/2/25 at 10:17 AM R37 stated that the facility took his wheelchair and gave him a high back wheelchair that he can't propel himself in and is not comfortable and he gets stuck in the hallway for long periods of time. R37 stated he did not know why they changed his wheelchair, but he does not like this one. On 6/3/25 at 9:19 AM R37 was transferred from his bed to his high back reclining wheelchair using a mechanical lift. R37's left hand was in a closed position with his fingernails pressing into the palm of his hand. R37 was asked if he could straighten his fingers on his left hand and R37 stated, I used to have a ball that I would hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dietitian's recommendations were implemented and failed to ensure a dietary supplement was given to a resident. This applies to 2 of 5 residents (R23 and R27) reviewed for weight loss in the sample of 20. The Findings include: 1.) R23's Weight Summary report printed on 6/4/25 showed the following weights: 173.2 pounds on 4/17/25, 169 pounds on 5/14/25, and 167.6 pounds on 6/3/25. R23's Nutrition/Dietary Note dated 4/17/25 indicated the dietitian recommended to add double portions to breakfast with the goal of stabilizing R23's weight and allowing weight gain. R23's Nutrition/Dietary Note dated 5/22/25 indicated the dietitian recommended adding a house supplement to be given twice a day. R23's Order Summary Report printed in 6/3/25 did not indicate orders for double portions at breakfast or a house supplement. The same document showed an order that R23 may receive calorie, protein, and/or nutrient supplements per the dietitian's recommendation. R23's meal ticket printed on 6/4/25 did not indicate he was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow dialysis recommendations for daily weights for 1 of 2 residents (R27) reviewed for dialysis in the sample of 20. The findings include: R27's face sheet shows he has diagnoses including: End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, and Dementia. A Health Status Note completed by V15 (Registered Nurse) on 5/21/25 at 9:14 PM, shows that R27 had gone out to dialysis and returned at 3:55 PM. The note also states, Per dialysis they would like pt (patient) on a 1200 CC fluid restriction and daily weights. R27's active Physician Order Summaries show the dialysis recommended daily weights was added into the active orders on 5/21/25. R27's Electronic Medical Record (EMR's) Weight Summary report and Medication Administration Record Summary (MAR) show he was weighed on 5/24/25 with no additional recorded weights after that date. On 6/3/25 at 11:48 AM, V9 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) said R27 is weighed via a mechanical lift scale and does not refuse to be weighed. V9 said R27 goes to dialysis 3 times a week and she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3.On 06/02/25 at 1:32 PM, V10 CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant emptied R47's indwelling urinary catheter bag. V10 CNA did not wear a gown when emptying the urinary collection bag. R47's room door had a sign that showed, Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Staff must wear gloves and a gown when providing care for a resident with a urinary catheter. On 06/04/25 at 10:05 AM, V2 DON-Director of Nursing said, residents with indwelling urinary catheters are on EBP-Enhanced Barrier Precautions. There is a chance of being splashed by urine when emptying the urinary catheter bag, gloves and a gown should be worn. We also provide face shields to protect the staff's eyes. The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions dated 04/2024 shows, Implementation of Enhanced Barrier Precautions: Make gowns and gloves available immediately near or outside of the resident's room. Note: face protection may also be needed if performing activity with risk of splash or spray. PPE-Personal Protective Equipment for enhanced barrier precautions is only necessary when performing high-contact care activities High-Contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have documentation that residents received or refused the pneumococcal vaccine for 2 of 5 residents (R11 and R28) reviewed for immunizations in the sample of 20. The findings include: R11 and R28's immunization records printed on 6/3/25 did not indicate they received or declined the pneumococcal vaccine On 06/03/25 at 11:28 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said the facility did not have documentations indicating R11 or R28 received or declined the pneumococcal vaccine. The immunization policy was requested on 6/3/25 and the facility could not provide the policy prior to exiting the facility on 6/4/25.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications at the scheduled times for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for pharmacy services in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated 5/5/25 showed R1 was diagnosed with congestive heart failure and lymphedema. A facility assessment done on 3/5/25 showed R1's mental status was intact. R1's orders showed an order for bumetanide (water pill) and potassium to be given twice a day. On 5/5/25 at 10:00 AM, R1 said his morning medications were late on 5/1/25 and 5/4/25 by nearly 3 hours. R1's Medication Admin Audit Report for 5/1/25 showed the morning doses of R1's bumetanide and potassium were scheduled for 7:30 AM. The document showed the medications were administered at 10:15 AM (2 hours and 45 minutes late). The medications were signed off by V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse). R1's Medication Admin Audit Report for 5/4/25 showed the morning doses of R1's bumetanide and potassium were scheduled for 7:30 AM. The bumetanide was signed off as administered at 9:35 AM (2 hours and 5 minutes late). R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an incident of verbal abuse was reported to the state agency. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1000, R1001) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 3. The findings include: On 6/11/25 at 9:25 AM, V2 (Director of Nursing) said on the morning of 6/9/25, R1001 was being assisted back to R1001's room when R1001 became verbally aggressive, shouting at staff using foul language and using racial slurs. V2 said as R1001 passed R1000's doorway, R1001 and R1000 exchanged words leading to R1001 calling R1000 a fat*ss and R1001 was being nasty towards R1000. V2 said the incident was not reported to the state agency and she felt the incident was more of a verbal altercation and not verbal abuse. On 6/11/25 at 1:15 PM, V1 (Administrator) said he was initially unaware of the altercation on 6/9/25 between R1000 and R1001 and believed the incident talked about with V2 at 9:25 AM was a previous incident. V1 also talked with R1000 about the incident and said that R1000 did believe the incident was verbally abusive and not just a verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse from another resident. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R5 and R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. The findings include: R6's Face Sheet dated 3/31/25 shows R6 has diagnoses that include, but are not limited to: adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood and other specified depressive episodes. R5's Care Plan initiated 10/23/24 shows that R5 has a history of becoming verbally aggressive towards staff. On 3/31/25 at 1:35 PM, V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant- CNA) said towards the end of V9's shift on Saturday, 3/29/25, V9 was providing care to another resident when V9 entered the hallway and saw R5's call light on. Without going to R5's room, V9 asked R5 what R5 needed and R5 responded saying R5 needed water. V9 acknowledged R5's request and told R5 that V9 will get R5 water when V9 finished caring for the resident V9 was working with. When V9 finished and exited the other resident's room, V9 saw that R5's call light was no longer on and had believed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of resident to resident verbal abuse was immediately reported to the administrator, and reported to the state agency. This applies to 2 of 4 residents (R5 and R6) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. The findings include: On 3/31/25 at 1:35 PM, V9 (Certified Nursing Assistant- CNA) said on Saturday, 3/29/25 during V9's shift, R5 got verbally and physically aggressive towards V9 which turned into R5 and R6 engaging in a verbal altercation. This verbal altercation resulted in R5 calling R6 a f*ucking b*tch and a fat b*tch. V9 said after leaving the facility after V9's shift ended, V9 sent V2 (Director of Nursing) a text message informing V2 about the altercation involving V9 and R5. V9 did not notify V2 of the details about R5 and R6. On 3/31/25 at 1:52 PM, V10 (RN) said after talking with and assessing R5 and R6 and providing R6 with anxiety medication, V10 called V1 (Administrator) and V2 and informed them of the incident. V10 did not provide V1 and V2 with all of the specific words that were used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to supervise a resident who wanders and has physical aggressive behaviors towards others. This applies to 2 of 15 residents (R12, R13) reviewed for safety in the sample of 15. The findings include: 1. R13's face sheet shows he is a [AGE] year-old male with diagnosis including bipolar, paranoid schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified mood (affective) disorder, anxiety, disorders of and psychosocial development. The facility's Final Abuse Investigation dated 3/18/25 documents on 3/16/25, (R12) reported that (R13) allegedly hit her on the head (R12) reported that she was backing out of the common area with her wheelchair and mistakenly ran into (R13) and (R13) hit her. The Final report shows (R12) stated staff members were in the dining room monitoring them all along and this happened before the staff could stop (R13). (R12) stated the staff separated (R13) from her .residents who witnessed this allegation stated, (R12) ran into R13…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received their medications. This applies to 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for medications in the sample of 15. The findings include: R2's Face sheet shows R2 has diagnoses that include but are not limited to; acute combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, acute and chronic respiratory failure, lymphedema, hypertension, anemia, and hypokalemia. On 3/17/25 at 9:25 AM, R2 said V10 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) doesn't provide his diuretic and potassium pills at the correct time, and he frequently gets delayed medications. R2 also stated that his legs were no longer weeping fluid, the fluid in his legs has decreased, and he no longer needs to wear tight bandages on his legs. On 3/18/25 at 9:35 AM, V10 (LPN) said for roughly a month or longer, V10 stopped caring for R2 when V10 worked, because R2 would get verbally aggressive towards V10 and use racial slurs against V10. V10 is no longer comfortable providing care for R2 and does not provide V10 medications. V10 said the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity for 7 of 9 residents (R1, R3, R4, R6, R7, R8, R9) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 9. The findings include: On 3/4/25 at 10:13 AM, R1 stated she told staff that she did not want a specific agency CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) caring for her anymore. R1 said the CNA had a bad attitude, spoke in a loud tone, and did not change her wet briefs quick enough. R1 said she told V3 (CNA Scheduler) about the request. R1 said the same aide was in her room about two weeks later and helping her roommate. R1 said the overnight aides are lazy and ignore her call light. On 3/4/25 at 10:50 AM, R3 stated she only trusts facility staff to care for her. R3 said the agency CNAs tell her to mind her own business if she complains. R3 said they speak rudely, don't know how to listen, and call her bossy. R3 said she has seen agency CNAs get reported and then they are still allowed to come back to the facility. On 3/4/25 at 12:48 PM, R4 said a CNA yelled at him when he asked where his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-02 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was allowed to stay in there room. This failure applies to 1 of 7 residents (R1) reviewed for room transfers in a sample of 7. The findings include: R1's Electronic Medical Record showed R1 is a cognitively intact [AGE] year old female who was admitted to the facility into a room on the 300 hallway. On 12/30/24 at 08:45 AM, R1 stated on 12/24/24 V1 Administrator came to R1's room, and told R1 they had to move to a different room. R1 stated V1 told her it was because they needed the room for a COVID positive resident. R1 stated she had been in that room since she was admitted to the facility in mid September. R1 stated she told V1 she did not want to move to a different room which ended up in an argument. R1 stated she was asked again on 12/25/24 about moving rooms. R1 stated she told V1 she did not want to move. R1 stated on 12/27/24 she was out on pass. R1 stated she left the facility around 10:00 AM with V5 (R1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse which applies to 1 of 7 residents (R1) reviewed for verbal abuse in a sample of 7. The findings include: R1's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 is a cognitively intact [AGE] year old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 12/30/24 at 9:00 AM, R1 stated on 12/24/24 V1 had come to her room and told her she needed to move rooms. R1 stated she did not want to move. R1 stated sometime after 4:00 PM, V1 came back and started arguing with her about changing rooms. R1 stated at one point V1 closed the door and started yelling at her about moving my belongings to another room. R1 stated it made her worried when he shut the door, came closer to her, and started yelling at her she had to move rooms. R1 stated V8 Registered Nurse opened the door, and V1 left. R1 stated she was mad after V1 left the room. On 12/30/24 at 10:30 AM, V1 stated he did go into R1's room to try to get her to move so they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the facility designee and failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency in a timely manner which applies to 1 of 7 residents (R1) reviewed abuse notification in a sample of 7. The findings include: R1's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 is a cognitively intact [AGE] year old female resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 12/30/24 at 9:00 AM, R1 stated on 12/24/24 V1 had come into her room and started yelling at her about moving rooms. V1 came into the room and closed the door. R1 stated V1 came over, went to pick up my pop off the floor. R1 stated she went to pull the pop away from V1. R1 stated V1's arm and the pop struck her in the face. R1 stated she yelled Ow, you hit me! then V1 stated No, you pulled me!. On 12/30/24 at 10:30 AM, V1 stated he did go into R1's room to try to get her to move so they could use the room for a COVID-19 positive resident. R1 stated she did not want to move.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate an investigation after an allegation of abuse and failed to remove an alleged perpetrator from the building following an allegation of abuse for 1 of 7 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse investigations in a sample of 7. The findings include: 1. The facility final Incidents Report showed R1's documentation was sent to (State Agency) on 12/27/24. This report showed the police were called to the facility and found no evidence to substantiate the allegation of physical abuse. The report showed no entries of any verbal allegations of abuse. On 12/30/24 at 10:30 AM, V1 (Administrator) stated the police were in the facility after R1 said V1 struck her. V1 stated the police talked to myself, and they said R1 had no signs of physical abuse. The police who came said it was unsubstantiated. V1 stated he sent all the information about the incident to (State Agency) On 12/30/24 at 3:25 PM, V5 (R1's driver) stated he was in the room when R1 and V1 were yelling at each other. V5 stated his back was to R1 and V1 when R1 said she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure five residents with norovirus-like symptoms (R7, R8, R11, R13, R15) were isolated to prevent cross contamination during the facility norovirus outbreak. This has the potential to affect all 76 residents residing at the facility. The findings include: 1. On 12/17/24 at 10:00 AM, R7 said she had vomiting and diarrhea over the weekend. R7 said she stayed in her room with her roommates (R8 and R13). R8 said she also had diarrhea last Sunday and another episode of diarrhea last night. R13 said today she does not feel well. R13 said she felt nauseous. Last Sunday night (12/15/24) she vomited and then started to also have diarrhea last night. The facility's line list for residents with norovirus (a highly contagious viral illness that causes vomiting and diarrhea) shows that both R7 and R8 had norovirus-like symptoms of diarrhea that started on 12/13/24. On 12/16/24 the line list shows the other roommate, R13, had vomiting on 12/16/24. The line list did not include R13's diarrhea last night (per R13). 2. On 12/17/24 at 9:12…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facility-initiated discharge documentation was included in the resident's medical record for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for resident discharge documentation in a sample of 5. The findings include: R1's Facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R1 is a sixty-six-year-old, cognitively intact resident. This assessment showed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included seizures, foot drop, post-traumatic osteoarthritis, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, and hypertension. R1's Physician Orders dated 12/11/24 showed no physician order for R1's discharge/transfer out of the facility. On 12/11/24 at 2:30 PM, R1 stated the facility did not talk to me about discharging until the day I was sent out. They told me they found me placement in a facility and got sent out later that night. R1's Progress Notes, Social Services Notes, Primary Care Notes, and Psychiatric Notes showed no summary or discussions of discharge plans…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate supervision was in place for a resident on pass to the community for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 16. The findings include: On 10/10/24 at 11:11 AM, R1 said R2 drove her to a local store to go shopping for gym shoes. R1 said on the way back from the store, R2 pulled into a local forest preserve and exposed his penis to her and propositioned her. R1 said R2 gave her a ride a couple times. R1 said the facility knew that she was going shopping with R2. On 10/10/24 at 12:36 PM, R2 said he had a car at the facility and he went out on pass a few times a week. R2 said he had driven R1 around a couple of times. R2 said he took R1 to the store and they did stop at the forest preserve, but he didn't expose himself. R2 said he stopped there to use the bathroom. R2 said the facility knew he took R1 shopping. R2 said R1 started blowing up his phone and hounding him for rides and he didn't want to. R2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide an ankle brace and hand splint for residents with limited range of motion. This applies to 2 of 3 residents (R1, R6) reviewed for splints/devices in the sample of 7. The findings include: 1. R1's face sheet shows she is a [AGE] year-old female with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting the right dominant side, fibromyalgia, history of falls, muscle weakness, other specified disorders of muscle, torus fracture of lower end of right fibula. On 9/9/24 at 9:42 AM, R1 was observed in her room sitting in her electric wheelchair. Her right foot was positioned outward towards the right on the wheelchair's foot board. R1 said she is supposed to have an ankle brace months ago. R1 said, V2 (Assistant Administrator) said he ordered the brace, and it was coming for several weeks. First, he said it was sent to the wrong facility and the previous maintenance staff was going to pick…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their Abuse Policy by not ensuring that staff reported an allegation of sexual abuse to the Administrator and by not investigating an allegation of sexual abuse. This applies to 4 of 14 residents (R4, R11, R18 and R22) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 22. The findings include: The facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 9/2023 states, It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. This policy also defines sexual abuse as non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident and lists the 8 components of abuse prevention as Screening, Employee Training, Prevention of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, Identification of Abuse Neglect and Exploitation, Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, Protection of Residents, Reporting/Response and Coordination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff report an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse to the Administrator or designee. This applies to 2 of 14 residents (R22 and R18) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 22. The findings include: The facility reported incident dated 7/10/24 states, On 7/10/24 at approximately 5:15 PM it was reported to the (V20- Director for Clinical Excellence/Corporate Nurse) while conducting interviews of residents on if they experienced any inappropriate behaviors towards them by other residents, (R22) stated no. As (V20) walked out of the room, the (R22) then stated actually 'yes, (R18) touched my breast on Thursday 7/4/24.' Upon initial investigation it was discovered that this allegation was actually on Friday 7/5/24 as staff that she said was working in the facility that day, was in fact not. (R18) is currently on 1:1 supervision. Family, MD and ombudsman of both residents were notified. Investigation initiated. Final report due in 5 days. On 7/11/24 at 10:00 AM R22 stated, It was during the day in the dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse. This applies to 1 of 14 residents (R11 and R4) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 22. The findings include: On 7/5/24 at 11:30 AM, V8 (Registered Nurse) stated, I was doing my 8:00 PM med pass and (R11) was shaking and crying and very upset. I went in and asked her what was wrong, and she told me her and (R4) had eaten dinner together in the dining room. (R4) followed her back to her room and came in her room and pulled his penis out and put it on her leg and told her to touch it. She excused herself and went into the bathroom and through the to the other room and told (R14) that she 'needed the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) now' and (R14) got the CNA to remove (R4) from the room. I don't know who the CNA was, and I don't think (R11) ever told the CNA what had happened. I notified (R2- Director of Nursing/DON) but I didn't notify (V1- Assistant Administrator) because he doesn't answer his phone after dark. I charted all of it and it should be there. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was assessed and documented for 1 of 18 residents (R75) reviewed for advanced directives in the sample of 18. The findings include: As of 5/15/24 at 1:00 PM, R75s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) shows nothing under Code Status in the heading section. R75's admission Record dated 5/14/24 shows R75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and his diagnoses include, but are not limited to, Multiple Sclerosis, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, cognitive communication deficit, diabetes, hypertension, chronic pain syndrome, hypothyroidism, and need for assistance with personal care. R75's Order Summary Report dated 5/14/24 shows no order for a code status. R75's EMR has no Advanced Directives forms. R75's current care plan provided by the facility does not address advanced directives. On 5/15/24 at 10:17 AM, V23, Licensed Practical Nurse, said she will look at the heading on a resident's EMR for their code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a male resident did not expose his private areas to female residents while outside on the smoking patio. This applies to 2 of 18 residents (R8 & R279) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 18. The findings include: R279's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows that R279 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Morbid Obesity, Nicotine Dependence, Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Anxiety Disorder. R279 was discharged to another facility on 4/5/24. On 5/14/24 at 1:05 PM R8 stated, (R279) was very sexually perverted. I saw his private organ. He let it hang out outside and then he would come in leave it is hanging out when he was going down the hall. Then he molested a helpless little old lady. He did it twice. The first time he got reprimanded for it and then he did it again. Both times he was touching her breast. About one month in between. That…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement Physician Ordered treatments for 2 of 18 residents (R50, R179) reviewed for physician orders in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1.On 05/13/24 at 9:43 AM, R50 was lying in bed. There was a sign on wall that shows, COMPRESSION STOCKING ON IN AM OFF AT BEDTIME. Abdominal binder on when up. R50 was not wearing his compression stockings. On 05/14/24 at 9:10AM, R50 was not wearing compression socks. On 05/13/24 at 9:43AM, R50 stated, I wear the compression stockings to help with circulation. On 05/14/24 at 9:12AM, V10 LPN-Licensed Practical Nurse said, the nurses or the CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant will put the socks on. When the physician order is AM, it means between 8:00AM, to 9:00AM. R50's Physician Order dated 04/16/2023 at 2:18PM, shows, compression stockings on in AM off in PM for hypotension. The facility's Applying Anti-emboli Stockings dated 10/2010 shows, the purpose of this procedure is to improve venous return to the heart, to improve arterial circulation to the feet, to minimize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were administered as ordered for 1 of 18 residents (R28) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 5/13/24 at 9:30 AM, R28 had a dressing to the top of his head initialed and dated 5/10. The dressing was soiled with drainage saturating about one half of the dressing. On 5/13/24 at 11:55 AM, V9, Registered Nurse, said the wound care nurse does the wound treatments, as ordered, but if a resident's dressing comes off or becomes soiled, the nurse caring for the resident will need to change/replace the dressing. V9 said the nurse initials and dates the dressing after completing the treatment. R28's Order Summary Report dated 5/14/24 shows orders dated 3/28/24 as follows: Scalp lesion: cleanse with normal saline solution, cover with calcium alginate, then island dressing every other day and every six hours as needed for soiled/missing dressing. The facility's Wound Treatment Management Policy (revised 6/23) shows wound treatments will be provided in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents wore their prescribed orthotic devices (splints) and failed to ensure residents were provided with a restorative program for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 18. The findings include: 1. On 5/13/24 at 10:08 AM, R25 was in his wheelchair in the hall. R25 had no brace on his right hand. On 5/14/24 at 8:36 AM R25 again had no brace to his right hand. On 5/14/24 at 9:26 AM, V13, Director of Rehab, said R25 has a hand splint for his right hand to prevent contractures. V13 said R25 is supposed to wear the splint during the day, and it can be off at night. V13 said if a resident does not wear their brace, they risk loss of mobility, pain, swelling, and contractures. V13 said R25 should have a care plan to include range of motion (ROM). V13 said if therapy recommends restorative therapy for residents, they discuss it in the care plan meeting, as there is no restorative nurse in the facility. V13 said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with insidious weight loss received a dietary intervention of ice cream with lunch for 1 of 6 residents (R71) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 18. The findings include: R71's weight summary showed R71 weighed 166 pounds on 3/5/2024 and 157.5 pounds on 5/7/2024 (8.5 pound weight loss). R71's Order Summary Report showed an order that R71 may receive calorie, protein and/or nutrient supplements per dietician recommendation. R71 had an active order per dietician's recommendation for ice cream with lunch and dinner. R71's Nutrition/Dietary Note dated 11/9/2023 showed R71 was to get ice cream with lunch and dinner for additional calories and protein. On 05/13/24 at 12:53 PM, R71 was in his room. V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was assisting R71 to eat. R71 did not have ice cream on his meal tray. V5 confirmed R71 did not receive ice cream with his lunch on 5/13/24. On 5/14/24 at 12:48 PM, V3 (Dietician) said R71 had lost weight (insidious) but had not triggered for a significant weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen humidifier bottle was changed every 72 hours for 1 of 5 residents (R30) reviewed for respiratory care in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 5/13/24 at 10:11 AM, R30 was in his wheelchair in his room. R30 had his oxygen tubing in his nares and the oxygen humidifier bottle was dated 2/8/24. On 5/14/24 at 3:08 PM, V10, Licensed Practical Nurse, said residents' oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle is supposed to be changed every week, usually on Sundays, by the nurse. R30's Order Summary Report dated 5/14/24 shows an active order for R30 to receive oxygen at 2-3 liters/minute per nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. The facility's Oxygen Administration Policy dated 1/2024 shows the oxygen humidifier bottle is to be changed every 72 hours.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident on Transmission Based Precautions had signage outside his room to indicate the isolation precautions for 1 of 18 residents (R28) reviewed for infection prevention in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 5/13/24 at 1:37 PM, R28's room had no signage displayed to indicate he was on isolation precautions of any kind. On 5/14/24 at 8:15 AM, R28's room had no signage displayed to indicate he was on isolation precautions of any kind. On 5/14/24 at 9:20 AM, V12, Certified Nursing Assistant, said she knows when a resident is on isolation because residents on isolation have a sign on their door showing they are on isolation. V12 said the sign tells what Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) should be worn in the room. R28's admission Record dated 5/14/24 shows R28 has an unspecified open wound of his scalp, an unspecified open wound of his right lower leg, and need for assistance with personal care. R28's Order Summary Report dated 5/14/24 shows R28 has an active order for Enhanced Barrier…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their Abuse Policy by not ensuring that staff report an allegation of sexual abuse to the Administrator and by not investigating an allegation of sexual abuse. This applies to 2 of 18 residents (R27 & R279) reviewed for abuse in a sample of 18. The finding include: On 5/14/24 an allegation of sexual abuse was given to a surveyor from an anonymous complainant. The allegation stated, On April 3 there was an incident verbally reported (but not charted) that (R279) sexually assaulted a mute, cognitively impaired resident, (R27). (V1- Administrator) and several managers reviewed the video footage (behind closed doors), and it was determined that a sexual assault had occurred. On 5/14/24 at 1:25PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, (R279) is no longer here. At times he would go out to smoke, and he would expose himself. He was called out on it a couple of times and he said he wouldn't do it again, but it didn't stop. He didn't ever verbalize anything sexual towards staff or other residents. There was an issue with one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the administrator and to the State Agency. This applies to 2 of 18 residents (R27 & R279) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 5/14/24 an allegation of sexual abuse was given to a surveyor from an anonymous complainant. The allegation stated, On April 3 there was an incident verbally reported (but not charted) that (R279) sexually assaulted a mute, cognitively impaired resident, (R27). (V1- Administrator) and several managers reviewed the video footage (behind closed doors) and it was determined that a sexual assault had occurred. On 5/14/24 at 1:25PM, V2 (Director of Nursing) stated, (R279) is no longer here. At times he would go out to smoke, and he would expose himself. He was called out on it a couple of times and he said he wouldn't do it again, but it didn't stop. He didn't ever verbalize anything sexual towards staff or other residents. There was an issue with one resident (R27) and they thought that he had touched her. (R27) was in the hallway in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to investigate an allegation of sexual abuse. This applies to 2 of 18 residents (R27 & R279) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 18. The findings include: On 5/14/24 an allegation of sexual abuse was given to a surveyor from an anonymous complainant. The allegation stated, On April 3 there was an incident verbally reported (but not charted) that (R279) sexually assaulted a mute, cognitively impaired resident, (R27). (V1- Administrator) and several managers reviewed the video footage (behind closed doors) and it was determined that a sexual assault had occurred. R279's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) shows that R279 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Morbid Obesity, Nicotine Dependence, Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Congestive Heart Failure, Peripheral Vascular Disease and Anxiety Disorder. R279 was discharged to another facility on 4/5/24. R27's EMR shows that she was admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the alarms on 2 of 7 exit doors were functional. This applies to 3 of 3 residents (R5, R8, R9) reviewed for elopement risk in the sample of 9. The findings include: 1. On 2/27/24 at 9:45 AM, this surveyor was able to open the emergency exit door at the end of the 400 hall and exit the building without the alarm sounding. On 2/27/24 at 1:22 PM, this surveyor was able to open the emergency exit door in the 300 conference room located at the end of the 300 hall and exit the building without the alarm sounding. Facility provided list of residents at risk for elopement shows that R5, R8, and R9 are at risk for elopement. R5's Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 11/15/23 shows R5 has purposeful exit seeking behavior and is at risk for elopement. R5's Behavior Note dated 11/10/23 at 4:13 PM states, resident eloped out the 300 emergency exit door, second registered nurse (RN) was able to redirect resident back into building, resident is very…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolatedHonor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to honor a resident's right to have a visitor by informing a visitor that visiting hours ended at 8:00 PM. This applies to 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 3. The findings include: R1's face sheet showed R1 was [AGE] years old and had the following diagnoses: osteomyelitis (bone infection), diabetes, high blood pressure, and history of cancer. On 1/31/24 at 12:56 PM, V6 (Social Worker) described R1 as alert and oriented and aware of what was going on. On 1/31/24 at 8:15 AM, R1 said on 1/28/24 V4 (R1's sister) was visiting him and staff wanted her to leave by 8:00 PM because that was when visiting hours ended. R1 said V4 left because visiting hours were ending, and he wanted V4 to stay longer. R1 said he was visiting with V4 in his room and he did not have a roommate. On 1/31/24 at 12:33 PM, V4 said on 1/28/24 V8 (Register Nurse) informed her visiting hours were from 8:00 AM - 8:00 PM and she had to leave by 8:00 PM. V4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal and mental abuse for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 5. The findings include: R1's Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] shows R1's cognition is intact. On 11/28/23 at 9:33 AM, R1 said the other day (11/20/23) he went to the nurses station to get his medication from V3 (Registered Nurse/RN). R1 said he then went back a short while later to ask if he had received his as needed medication. R1 said he did not remember the name of it but it started with a 'T. R1 said V3 then said, I can't keep getting up and down, up and down. R1 said V3 stated, How am I supposed to give you a medication if you don't even know the name of it. R1 said he has Alzheimer's Disease and has trouble remembering things. R1 said at time he said to her, Why are you bching at me? R1 said at one point, V3 got very upset and started yelling at him and told R1 he could not call her a bch. R1 said V3 then went to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility staff failed to immediately report an allegation of abuse to the administrator and the State Survey Agency for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 5. The findings include: On 11/28/23 at 9:33 AM, R1 said the other day (11/20/23) he went to the nurses station to get his medication from V3 (Registered Nurse/RN). R1 said he then went back a short while later to ask if he had received his as needed medication. R1 said he did not remember the name of it but it started with a 'T. R1 said V3 then said, I can't keep getting up and down, up and down. R1 said V3 stated, How am I supposed to give you a medication if you don't even know the name of it. R1 said he has Alzheimer's Disease and has trouble remembering things. R1 said at time he said to her, Why are you bching at me? R1 said at one point, V3 got very upset and started yelling at him and told R1 he could not call her a bch. R1 said V3 then went to the medication cart and started slamming things around. R1 said he then asked her if she found the medication and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility staff failed to investigate an allegation of abuse and protect the resident from further abuse while the investigation is in progress for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for abuse in the sample of 5. The findings include: On 11/28/23 at 9:33 AM, R1 said the other day (11/20/23) he went to the nurses station to get his medication from V3 (Registered Nurse/RN). R1 said he then went back a short while later to ask if he had received his as needed medication. R1 said he did not remember the name of it but it started with a 'T. R1 said V3 then said, I can't keep getting up and down, up and down. R1 said V3 stated, How am I supposed to give you a medication if you don't even know the name of it. R1 said he has Alzheimer's Disease and has trouble remembering things. R1 said at time he said to her, Why are you bching at me? R1 said at one point, V3 got very upset and started yelling at him and told R1 he could not call her a bch. R1 said V3 then went to the medication cart and started slamming things around. R1 said he then asked her if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure residents' shower was maintained comfortable and homelike for 4 of 11 residents (R1, R2, R5, and R8) reviewed for safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment in the sample of eleven. The finding include: On 09/11/23 at 8:54AM, R2 said, there is mold in the 300-hall shower. On 09/11/23 at 12:11PM, the 300-hall shower had a mottling of black, white, light brown, pink color in the corners where the shower floor and shower walls meet. On 09/11/23 at 12:11PM, V3 Housekeeping said, I have sprayed bleach on the area and scrubbed it, the color will not come off. On 09/11/23 at 12:28PM, V4 Maintenance said, I have not received any complaints about dark or black caulk around the shower. I get work orders on items that I need to attend to. Any staff member can fill out a work order. Residents usually have the receptionist fill out the work order. We do have lime build up. The water softener is not working. On 09/11/23 V6 CNA-Certified Nursing Assistant provided a list of residents that used the 300-hall shower. The list shows…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with contractures or who were at risks of developing contractures received range of motion for 5 of 6 residents (R27, R22, R56, R23 and R59) reviewed for range of motion in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R27's admission Record, printed by the facility on 4/12/23, showed he had diagnoses including cerebral palsy, anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. R27's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed he was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene. The assessment showed R27 had a limitation in range of motion to his bilateral upper and lower extremities. R27's plan of care. with a target date of 6/27/23, showed he requires passive range of motion (PROM) exercises to his extremities related to limited mobility and contractures to his upper and lower extremities. The plan of care showed R27 would participate in PROM exercise to bilateral lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure call lights were being answered in a timely manner for 2 of 2 residents (R7 & R67) reviewed for dignity in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. On 4/11/23 at 1:56 PM, R7 stated she must wait 45 minutes for her call light to be answered and receive assistance. R7 stated she must wait so long to be taken to the bathroom that she will wet herself. R7 stated it makes her feel awful and she cries about it. R7 stated this usually happens in the morning. R7 stated she will put her call light on in the morning and sometimes falls asleep while waiting for it to be answered. R7 stated staff will turn off the call light and leave and never ask her what she needed. R7's roommate (R46 - resident council president) was present and stated she has seen staff come in, turn off the call light and just leave without asking R7 what she needed. R7 stated it gets so bad that she will wet herself and she doesn't know how to fix the problem. The admission Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received a bath/shower weekly and complete cleansing of a resident's peri-area was done after an incontinence episode for 2 of 2 residents (R25 & R23) reviewed for activities of daily living in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. On 4/11/23 at 10:28 AM, V6 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Supervisor and V10 CNA were at R25's bedside. R25 was disheveled and had greasy hair. R25 was upset and crying. R25 stated she was in isolation for a couple of weeks because she had a UTI (urinary tract infection) and she didn't get a shower. V6 and V10 stated when a resident is on isolation the get bed baths. R25 stated she did not get a bed bath for two weeks. V6 stated residents were to get showers or bed baths twice per week. The shower/bathing schedule depends on the room the resident is in. V6 and V10 stated they did not know why R25 did not receive a bed bath. V6 stated skin sheets were done with showers and bed baths.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident with seizure-like activity when the resident was outside smoking. The facility also failed to transfer a resident to a shower chair in a safe manner. This applies to 2 of 9 residents (R46, R25) reviewed for safety and supervision in the sample of 19. The findings include: R46's admission Record, printed by the facility on 4/12/23, showed she had diagnoses including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, obsessive compulsive disorder, PTSD, and dissociative and conversion disorder. R46's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed R46 was cognitively intact (BIMS score of 15). On 4/11/23 at 12:04 PM, R8 came in from the outside smoking area and informed this surveyor that R46 had just had a seizure while they were outside smoking. R8 said one of the other residents (a male was all she would say) held R46's head while she was having the seizure, so she did not hit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered as prescribed. This applies to 1 of 2 residents (R57) reviewed for oxygen use in the sample of 19. The findings include: R57's admission Record, printed 4/13/23 shows his diagnoses to include acute respiratory failure, personal history of COVID-19, heart failure, muscle weakness and cognitive communication deficit. R57's 12/20/22 MDS (Minimum Data Set) shows he needs extensive assistance with all his ADL's (Activities of daily living). The same MDS shows his is moderately cognitively impaired. On 4/11/23 at 9:44 AM, R57 was sitting in wheel chair and had his O2 (oxygen) on his nose using a nasal cannula. R57's O2 canister's dial was indicating it was empty (needle at the bottom of the dial, in the red zone). On 4/11/23 at 9:50 AM, V8, (Activity Director), asks R57 if he wants to attend an activity and R57 started to self propel himself out room slowly with his portable O2 canister's dial indicating it was empty. On 4/11/23 at 12:21 PM, V9 CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) assists…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide incontinent care in a manner to prevent infection and failed to clean urine from the floor and from a non-skid pad to prevent cross contamination for 3 of 3 residents (R27, R23 and R22) reviewed for infection control in the sample of 19. The findings include: 1. R27's admission Record, printed by the facility on 4/12/23, showed he had diagnoses including cerebral palsy, anxiety disorder, and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. R27's facility assessment dated [DATE] showed he was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, dressing and personal hygiene. The assessment showed R27 had a limitation in range of motion to his bilateral upper and lower extremities. R27's ADL (activities of daily living) plan of care, with a target date of 6/27/23, showed he is totally dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene. R27's incontinence plan of care, with a target date of 6/27/23, showed he is incontinent of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$673,254 in federal fines across 8 penalties. 4 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $72,640 — penalty dated 2026-06-10
- $143,650 — penalty dated 2026-03-31
- $60,140 — penalty dated 2025-12-19
- $163,761 — penalty dated 2025-04-30
- $80,417 — penalty dated 2025-02-13
- $17,292 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
- $19,760 — penalty dated 2024-10-11
- $115,594 — penalty dated 2024-05-15
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-29 for 35 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-23 for 91 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-08 for 24 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-03 for 43 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $109K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145222. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.