Northview Health And Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 59 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 72.4 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.06 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.12 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse from staff for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, as evidenced by CNA 3 placing soap and/or hot sauce in the resident's mouth and expressing threats of washing the resident's mouth out with soap. (Resident B) Using the reasonable person concept, it can be determined that Resident B experienced psychosocial harm from these abusive actions and threats of corporal punishment taking place in her home (the nursing facility). Findings include: During a confidential interview, one of Resident B's representatives indicated they had been contacted by the facility regarding an allegation of Resident B being abused by an employee. They were informed a staff member put either soap, hot sauce, or both on their loved one's mouth (Resident B). Their loved one was cognitively impaired. Resident B did not remember the event. Prior to her cognitive impairment, she would have considered soap or hot sauce in the mouth to be abusive. She might have believed she had done…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care in a respectful and dignified manner for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Residents B and D) Findings include:1. Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 6/22/26 at 12:00 p.m. Diagnoses included left hip osteoarthritis and cerebral infarction without residual effects.A quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/16/26, indicated the resident was impaired in both lower extremities; required substantial to maximum assistance for toilet hygiene, toilet transfers, dressing upper and lower body. The resident was moderately cognitively impaired.During an interview on 6/22/26 at 12:37 p.m., Resident B indicated, on the evening of 6/19/26, CNA 1 was assisting her off the toilet. The resident indicated she had a system for transferring from the toilet to her wheelchair. The resident requested to have the wheelchair positioned in a specific position. CNA 1 did not position the wheelchair as requested and repeatedly asked the resident if she needed her assistance. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-03-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were prepared in advance, signed and approved by a Registered Dietitian, had portion size guidance, and ensured nutritional adequacy. This deficient practice had the potential to impact 72 of 72 residents who ate meals prepared in the facility kitchen.Findings include:During an interview on 3/4/26 at 11:09 a.m., the DON indicated when the survey began the facility had a census of 74. Of the 74 residents, 72 consumed food by mouth and ate meals prepared in the facility kitchen.During an observation of the puree process, on 3/2/26 at 10:33 a.m., [NAME] 11 began to puree the entree of baked potato bar or topped baked potatoes. He had a steam table pan with peeled baked potatoes. The potatoes had flecks of orange and brown on them. During an interview, at the time of the observation, [NAME] 11 indicated the orange flecks were cheese and the brown flecks were bacon. He indicated he did not measure the cheese or bacon to ensure each resident received an adequate amount of protein. He indicated he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported allegations of abuse immediately to the Administrator or designee and failed to ensure self-reported incidents were communicated to the Indiana Department of Health in a manner that was accurate, detailed, complete, and thorough to allow the department to evaluate the need to advocate for the health and safety of the facility residents for 1 of 3 self- reported incidents reviewed. (Resident B) Findings include:Findings include: A Facility Self-Reported Incident, submitted to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) on 1/27/26, indicated the following: The staff overheard CNA 3 make inappropriate comments to Resident B and intervened and directed the CNA to cease interaction with resident. The employee was removed from schedule pending investigation. The nurse practitioner (NP), Director of Nursing (DON), Administrator, and family were notified. The witnessing staff was identified as LPN 4.During a confidential interview, one of Resident B's representatives indicated they had been contacted by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from the potential for further abuse when an alleged perpetrator (CNA 3) was permitted to continue providing care to residents for approximately three hours following an allegation of abuse. (Resident B)Findings include: Findings include: During a confidential interview, one of Resident B's representatives indicated they had been contacted by the facility regarding an allegation of Resident B being abused by an employee. They were informed a staff member put either soap, hot sauce, or both on their loved one's mouth (Resident B). Their loved one was cognitively impaired. Resident B did not remember the event. Prior to her cognitive impairment, she would have considered soap or hot sauce in the mouth to be abusive. She might have believed she had done something wrong and was being punished. In her day, she may have thought some people put soap in a child's mouth for lying or cursing. Resident B probably believed she was being punished. During an interview on 3/2/26 at 2:28 p.m., LPN 4 indicated she did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives with written notice of transfer/discharge and bed hold policy for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Residents 77, 69, and 7)Finding includes: 1.Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed on 3/2/26 at 10:18 a.m. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), Parkinson's disease, and hypertension. A 1/23/26, discharge MDS assessment indicated the resident discharged with a return anticipated. A 1/23/26, progress note indicated Resident 7 complained of pain in the left knee and hip related to a previous fall. A new order to send the resident to the emergency room was obtained. The clinical record lacked indication the resident and/or representative was provided with a copy of the transfer/discharge form and bed hold policy. Review of notice of transfer/discharge forms and bed hold policy, dated 1/23/26, provided by the RN Clinical Support on 3/3/26 at 3:49 p.m., indicated the resident was discharged to the hospital. The documents did not indicate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was permitted to exercise their right to determine their own treatment by denying transfer to an emergency room for reported pain. (Resident 69)Findings include:Resident 69's clinical record was reviewed on 3/2/26 at 1:20 p.m. Diagnoses included right sided hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness), calculus of kidney (kidney stones), urine retention, and presence of ureteral stents.Current physician orders include oxycodone (a narcotic medication) 5 milligrams (mg) by mouth every 4 hours as needed (PRN) for mild to moderate pain and acetaminophen (an analgesic pain reliever) 500 mg by mouth every 8 hours PRN for pain.A 9/4/25, admission, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment indicated the resident was cognitively intact.A 10/2/25 at 3:31 a.m., progress note indicated Resident 69 reported back pain and requested his pain medication. The resident's narcotic pain medication had been provided at 12:36 a.m., and another dose was not available yet. The resident's analgesic pain reliever was offered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff competently administered medication when admission orders were not clarified for 1 of 4 at risk residents with the potential of causing adverse effects. (RN 1 and Resident E)Findings include:Resident E's clinical record was reviewed on 12/30/25 at 2:27 p.m. Diagnoses included displaced fracture of base of neck of right femur, Parkinson's Disease, anxiety disorder, restless leg syndrome, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, and COVID-19. The most current admission MDS (Minimal Data Set) assessment, dated 12/15/25, indicated the resident was dependent for toilet hygiene; required maximum assistance for personal hygiene and dependent to maximum assistance for repositioning and bed mobility. A current care plan, dated 12/26/25, indicated the resident had Parkinson's Disease. Interventions included, give medications as ordered by the physician. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. A current activity of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained during dining by providing assistance with their meal. (Resident 49) Findings include: During a dining observation on 2/21/25 at 12:32 p.m., Resident 49 struggled to get food on her fork. She held the fork upside down and tried to get a bite of a cookie. She attempted to take a bite, and tried again as there was no food on the fork. At 12:46 p.m., CNA 9 asked the resident if she was okay. The resident nodded yes, and continued to unsuccessfully try to get food on her fork. The rest of her food was uneaten and out of her reach. At 12:49 p.m., CNA 9 helped her turn the utensil around and the resident was able to get a few bites of beans into her mouth. The plate with collard greens, fried potatoes, and cornbread remained out of Resident 49's reach. The resident coughed following a bite of beans and CNA 9 told her to take a drink. The drink was not within reach. The resident tried to reach the chocolate pudding, but it was out of reach. At 1:03 p.m., CNA 9 moved the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide notifications of discharges to the Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. (Resident 53 and 30) Findings include: 1. Resident 53's clinical record was reviewed on 2/21/25 at 11:48 a.m. Diagnoses included heart failure, change of fatty liver, generalized muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and need for assistance with personal care. A discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/18/24, indicated the resident discharged with a return anticipated. A Nurse's note, dated 12/18/24 at 6:46 p.m., indicated the resident was transported to the hospital for evaluation due to lethargy. A Nurse's note, dated 12/28/24 at 3:52 p.m., indicated the resident returned from the hospital and was readmitted to the facility. 2. Resident 30's clinical record was reviewed on 2/24/25 at 2:58 p.m. Diagnoses included dementia, generalized muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and need for assistance with personal care. A discharge MDS assessment, dated 1/12/25, indicated the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance and cuing with dining to maximize residents' current abilities for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Residents 49 and 223) Findings include: During a dining observation on 2/21/25 at 12:32 p.m., Resident 49 struggled to get food on her fork. She held the fork upside down and tried to get a bite of a cookie. She attempted to take a bite, and tried again as there was no food on the fork. At 12:46 p.m., CNA 9 asked the resident if she was okay. The resident nodded yes, and continued to unsuccessfully try to get food on her fork. The rest of her food was uneaten and out of her reach. At 12:49 p.m., CNA 9 helped her turn the utensil around and the resident was able to get a few bites of beans into her mouth. The plate with collard greens, fried potatoes, and cornbread remained out of Resident 49's reach. The resident coughed following a bite of beans and CNA 9 told her to take a drink. The drink was not within reach. The resident tried to reach the chocolate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 88 rows in the source record cover these 61 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $473K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN