Majestic Care Of Bedford

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 142 beds and averages 101.1 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.26 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the informed consent prior to an increase or a start of a psychotropic medications for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 13 and 23)Findings include: 1. On 5/13/26 at 11:55 a.m., Resident 13's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with psychotic behaviors and anxiety. The care plan, dated 10/30/25, indicated Resident 13 received psychotropic medication. The intervention was to educate the resident's family about the risks, the benefits and the potential adverse side effects of the prescribed medication, and to obtain the consent as indicated. The Physician Order indicated Rexulti (antipsychotic) 1 milligram (mg) was initiated one time a day for dementia with agitation, on 12/11/25. The December 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Rexulti 1 mg administration was started on 12/12/25. The Psychoactive Medication Consent and Management Agreement, dated 12/14/25, lacked documentation from resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Discharge MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was completed within allotted timeframe for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for resident assessment. (Resident 108)Finding includes:On 5/12/26 at 10:18 a.m., Resident 108's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, alcohol abuse, anxiety and major depressive disorder. A progress note, dated 12/18/25 at 12:50 a.m., indicated Resident 108 was transferred to the emergency room. A progress note, dated 12/18/25 at 11:38 a.m., indicated the resident would be transferred to another Long Term Care facility upon discharge from the hospital.A review of Resident 108's MDS assessments indicated there was no Discharge MDS assessment completed.A review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI), 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.20.1, October 2025, on 5/12/26 11:00 a.m., indicated the Discharge MDS assessment must be completed within 14 calendar days after the discharge date and must be submitted within 14 days after the MDS completion date.During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for 1 of 32 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident 23)Findings include:On 5/13/26 at 11:50 a.m., Resident 23's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease and major depressive disorder. A review of the resident's April 2026, MAR (Medication Administration Record) indicated on 4/2/26, the resident was prescribed mirtazapine (an antidepressant medication) at bedtime for insomnia. A 4/9/26 admission MDS assessment failed to document an antidepressant prescription for the resident.During an interview on 5/13/26 at 12:08 p.m., the MDS coordinator indicated the 4/9/26 MDS assessment was incorrect and should have included the antidepressant medication.410 IAC (Indiana Administrative Code) 16.2-3.1-31(d)

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was current for a resident receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 3)On the following dates and times, Resident 3 was observed in her room receiving oxygen from a humidifying oxygen delivery machine via a nasal cannula: 5/8/26 at 1:54 p.m.5/12/26 at 10:10 a.m. and 12:13 p.m.5/13/26 at 10:35 a.m. During an interview on 5/8/26 at 1:55 p.m., Resident 3 indicated after her last hospitalization she was told to use the oxygen for another 30 days. It was past 30 days, and she was still wearing the nasal cannula and receiving oxygen, because staff told her she needed it. The nasal cannula bothered her, and she did not want to wear it if it was not necessary. On 5/11/26 at 11:05 a.m., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, atrial fibrillation and anxiety. A review of current physician's orders indicated no oxygen was prescribed. The last physician's order for oxygen had a start…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from mental abuse by staff for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. CNA's covered a resident's face with a pillowcase during care. This deficient practice would result in a reasonable person experiencing distress, disorientation, fear, and mental anguish. (Resident B, CNA 2, CNA 3) Finding includes:During an interview on 3/10/26 at 8:21 a.m., CNA 1 indicated staff should not have placed a pillowcase over Resident B's face. CNA 1 would have stopped the staff, removed the pillowcase from Resident B's face and made sure Resident B was okay, removed the staff from resident care areas, and reported what he saw to the Administrator as abuse. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 3/10/26 at 8:50 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, severe intellectual disability, and muscular dystrophy. During an interview on 3/10/26 at 9:53 a.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) indicated she walked into Resident B's room and saw CNA 2 and CNA 3 getting ready to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0741 — failed to have staff trained for behavioral health — isolated
  Ensure that the facility has sufficient staff members who possess the competencies and skills to meet the behavioral health needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based in interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff possessed the skill sets to provide care to a resident with behavior health needs for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behavioral health. (Resident B) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 3/10/26 at 8:50 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral palsy, severe intellectual disability, and muscular dystrophy. A care plan, dated 11/4/25, indicated Resident B exhibited behavioral symptoms of hitting, kicking, and spitting at staff when providing care. The interventions included, but were not limited to, if Resident B becomes resistive to care or combative then postpone care and re-approach, initiated 11/4/24.During an interview on 3/10/26 at 9:53 a.m., the Social Service Director (SSD) indicated she walked into Resident B's room and saw CNA 2 and CNA 3 getting ready to transfer Resident B from his bed to his wheelchair. Resident B's head was not in the pillowcase, but Resident B's entire face was covered with a pillowcase. The SSD told CNA 2 and CNA 3 to stop what…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse when a severely cognitively impaired male resident grabbed another female resident by the hair, grabbed female resident's face causing a scratch, and slapped resident in the face and pushed on their eyes causing a corneal abrasion for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident B, Resident D, Resident E, Resident F) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 6/25/25 at 8:42 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chorea (a neurological disorder that causes involuntary, random, and continuous muscle movements while awake), cerebral palsy, anxiety disorder, and autistic disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/22/25, indicated Resident B was severely cognitively impaired and displayed verbal and physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others. A progress note, dated 6/8/25 at 2:11 p.m., indicated Resident B walked over toward the nurse's desk and as he walked by Resident D, Resident B reached…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received urinary incontinence care for a resident that was incontinent of urine for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary incontinence. (Resident F) Findings include: On 6/25/25 from 10:59 a.m. until 11:07 a.m., observed Resident F sitting in the common area lying back in his wheelchair. There was a stream of urine running down from the wheelchair seat onto the floor where there was a large puddle of urine. Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 1 walked up to Resident F's wheelchair and pushed it forward so the housekeeper could mop the floor. Once the housekeeper was finished mopping the area, he moved Resident F's wheelchair back. At that time, QMA 1 indicated she hadn't addressed Resident F's incontinence because the CNA's were busy and Resident F required a mechanical lift. LPN 1 was standing next to QMA 1 and QMA 1 indicated nurses were allowed to help provide incontinence care. The clinical record for Resident F was reviewed on 6/25/25 at 1:35 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a sanitary manner for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. Food was not discarded by the discard date and food was stored under the condenser fan. This had the potential to affect 85 of 102 residents who were served food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 3/28/25 at 10:30 a.m., during a follow-up tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM), the following was observed: - The walk in refrigerator had a container of liquid salad dressing with an open date of 1/12/25 and a discard date of 2/12/25. - The walk in freezer had an open box of cheddar biscuits directly under the condenser fan, there was ice accumulation noted on the fan directly above the box of food. The biscuits were covered in a plastic bag inside of opened box. During an interview with the DM on 3/28/25 at 10:30 a.m., she indicated that all containers opened were good for 30 days, after 30 days they were to be discarded. The DM indicated that the container of salad dressing should have been discarded on 2/12/25. The DM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the written notification required for a transfer and discharge was provided to the resident and the resident representative for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 41, Resident 74) Findings include: 1. Resident 74's clinical record was reviewed on 3/27/25 at 10:27 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and dementia. Resident 74's progress notes indicated the resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. The clinical record lacked documentation of written notification of the transfer and discharge forms having been provided to the resident representative. During an interview on 3/27/25 at 11:30 a.m., the Administrator indicated the facility did not have documentation which indicated the transfer and discharge forms were provided in writing to Resident 74's representative. 2. Resident 41's clinical record was reviewed on 3/27/25 at 2:54 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN