Majestic Care Of Bloomington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 107.5 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · F2025-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was labeled with an open date for 1 of 2 kitchen observations. This had the potential to affect 99 out of 99 residents.Findings include:During an initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 9/2/25 at 10:05 a.m., an opened container of ranch dressing, an open container of salsa, an opened container of mustard, and an opened container of vanilla icing were observed without an opened date. The DM was observed to remove the items from the refrigerator, toss them, and he indicated the foods needed to have an open date. On 9/18/25 at 12:15 p.m., the Administrator provided the facility policy, LABELING & DATING GUIDELINES, revised on 12/12/23, and indicated it was the policy currently being used. A review of the policy indicated, All opened and leftover items will be labeled with the date of opening/date stored and discard/use-by date .3.1-21(i)(2)3.1-21(i)(3)

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-09-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing (nursing care designed to maintain functional ability of residents) of passive range of motion for 4 of 4 residents review for mobility. (Resident 3, Resident 25, Resident 70, and Resident 71) Findings include: 1.During an interview on 9/3/25 at 11:20 a.m., Resident 3 indicated she had a stroke and had limited range of motion (decreased ability to move a joint) of her left arm and hand. She did not get exercises anymore. At that time. Resident 3 was observed to have limited range of motion of her left arm and hand.On 9/8/25 at 10:20 a.m., CNA 1 was observed to provide morning care to Resident 3. At that time, no passive range of motion was provided. On 9/8/25 at 10:55 a.m., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side) and dementia.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/16/25, indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact, had limited range of motion on one side of the upper and lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was administered psychotropic medications was monitored for adverse side effects for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 61)Finding includes: On 9/4/25 at 11:10 a.m., Resident 61's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, major depression, and bipolar disorder. The Physician's orders included, but were not limited to:- Ability (antipsychotic medication), 10 mg (milligrams) daily, initiated 1/23/25.- Buproprion (antidepressant medication) 100 mg, twice daily, initiated 8/30/25.- Trazadone (antidepressant medication) 0.5 mg, daily, initiated 5/15/25.- Citalopram (antidepressant medication) 40 mg, twice daily, initiated 8/13/25. The clinical record lacked documentation of the monitoring of adverse side effects for an antipsychotic medication and antidepressant medications. During an interview on 9/8/25 at 2:10 p.m., the Director of Nursing indicated monitoring of adverse side effects were to be documented in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for behavior and mood. (Resident 35)Finding includes:On 9/4/25 at 9:49 a.m., Resident 35's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder.A physicians order, dated 3/10/25, indicated Buspirone HCl Tablet (a medication used to treat anxiety disorder) 5 milligrams three times daily. The order was discontinued on 8/21/25.A physicians order, dated 3/11/25, indicated Escitalopram Oxalate Tablet (a medication used to treat depression and anxiety disorder) 20 milligrams daily.The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/15/25, did not indicate the resident was on antidepressant or antianxiety medications.During an interview with the MDS Coordinator on 9/8/25 at 1:45 p.m., she indicated the resident was taking antianxiety and antidepressant medications during the ARD (Assessment Reference Date) window of the Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 7/15/25. The MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for complete and accurate documentation. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 1/23/25 at 8:20 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis of vertebrae, peripheral vascular disease, neurogenic bladder, and diabetes. An Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/17/24, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact. The physician's order included, but were not limited to: - Cleanse coccyx (tailbone) wound with wound cleanser, apply wound vac (wound dressing that uses suction to remove drainage and encourage new tissue growth) to coccyx at 125 mmHg (millimeters of Mercury) on day shift every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Initiated on 12/16/24 and discontinued on 1/8/25. - Cleanse coccyx wound with wound cleanser, apply calcium alginate, apply kerlex, cover with absorbent dressing on day shift. Initiated on 1/9/25 and discontinued on 1/15/25. -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 213) Finding includes: On 10/30/24 at 9:56 a.m., Resident 213 was observed to be lying asleep in bed with the oxygen concentrator level set at 3 L (liters) per minute and the N/C (nasal cannula) sitting on her face and not in the nostrils. On 10/30/24 at 2:49 p.m., Resident 213 was observed to be lying asleep in bed with the oxygen concentrator level set at 3 L per minute and the N/C sitting on her face and not in the nostrils. On 11/1/24 at 9:38 a.m., Resident 213 was observed to be lying asleep in bed with the oxygen concentrator level set at 3 L per minute and the N/C in her nostrils. On 11/1/24 at 2:33 p.m., Resident 213 was observed to be lying asleep in bed with the oxygen concentrator level set at 3 L per minute and the N/C sitting on her face and not in the nostrils. On 11/4/24 at 11:06 a.m., Resident 213 was observed to be lying asleep in bed with the oxygen concentrator level set at 3 L per minute and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart on the 300 unit was locked for 1 of 8 medication carts observed. (300 Unit Medication Cart) Findings include: On 10/30/24 from 10:18 a.m. until 10:38 a.m., the medication cart outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to be unlocked and unattended by staff. The medication cart contained medications for residents on the 300 unit. During an interview on 10/30/24 at 10:39 a.m., RN 1 indicated she had been at the other end of the hallway providing care to residents from another medication cart, and the medication cart was to be locked if it was unattended by staff. On 11/4/24 at 4:00 p.m., the Director of Nursing provided the Facility Drug Product Storage Requirements, revised 2/22/22, and indicated this was the policy currently used by the facility. A review of the policy indicated, .all drug storage areas shall be kept secure from unauthorized entry and shall be limited to authorized personnel . 3.1-25(m)

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · C2024-11-04 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the posted daily staffing information sheet included the facility name for 5 of 5 daily staffing sheets reviewed. Findings include: On 10/29/24 at 2:30 p.m., the daily nurse staffing information sheet was observed posted near the front entrance door. The staffing information sheet lacked documentation of the facility name. During a review of the posted staffing sheets, dated 10/29/24, 10/30/24, 10/31/24, 11/1/24, and 11/4/24 indicated the staffing information sheets lacked documentation of the facility name. During an interview on 11/4/24 at 3:40 p.m., the Administrator indicated the staffing sheet was printed daily through a new company program. He indicated he was not aware the facility name should be on the report. During a interview on 11/4/24 at 3:58 p.m., the Administrator indicated the facility did not have a policy regarding posted daily staffing information.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN