Transcendent Healthcare Of Boonville - North
305 E North St, Boonville, IN 47601 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 56 certified beds · (812) 897-2810 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $253,955 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-17)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- about 35% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.3% | 11.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 40.9% | 25.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.3% | 11.9% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 43.3% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.1% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.8% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 34.1% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 22.7% | 1.2% | 1.4% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 12.1% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 13.0% | 10.8% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.61 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.31 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 5.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 6.8–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 5.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 10.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 10.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.68 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. Inspectors cited this home for failing to submit its staffing data to CMS (F0851) — see the citation below; CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a facility-wide system to prevent, identify, report, investigate, and control infections for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident 27, Resident 19, Resident 1, and Resident 48). Residents who experienced upper respiratory symptoms were not tested or treated for influenza. The facility did not investigate the cause of or track residents' signs and symptoms. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 27, Resident 1, and Resident 48 being hospitalized . Residents tested positive for influenza A upon arriving at the hospital. Resident 19 was ordered to be sent to the hospital, but expired before she could get there. Resident 27 and Resident 1 expired while in the hospital from complications from influenza A.This Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE], when residents complained of upper respiratory symptoms. The facility failed to test residents for influenza A and track signs and symptoms in order to prevent the spread of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent a resident with a history of exit-seeking/elopement behavior from exiting the facility and leaving the property for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement. This deficient practice resulted in an elopement that occurred during the morning hours of September 1, 2025. The resident was located with the assistance of the local police department, approximately 1.2 miles from the nursing facility, near a previous residence. This Immediate Jeopardy began on September 1, 2025, when the facility failed to ensure Resident C did not exit the facility property through a doorway on the [NAME] Hall at approximately 5:30 A.M. Resident C was not realized to be missing until 7:15 A.M. after staff noticed she was not in her room. A search in and around the facility lasted approximately 30 minutes before local law enforcement was notified and arrived to the facility at approximately 7:50 P.M. Resident C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention measures were in place for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls resulting in major injury. This deficient practice resulted in a fall with a brain bleed. (Resident 5)Finding includes: On 2/11/26 at 9:19 A.M., Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia.A care plan dated 7/23/24 indicated the resident was at risk for falls related to confusion, unaware of safety needs, vision/hearing problems with diagnosis of dementia. Interventions included, but were not limited to:Non-skid strips to shower floor dated 4/28/25Apply Fluorescent tape to armrest for visual guidance dated 8/6/25Dycem (non-slip material to provide grip and stability) in recliner dated 9/2/25Provide spill proof cup for hydration to prevent spills that may cause slipping and falls in room dated 11/21/25Adding non-slip furniture pads under recliner dated 12/18/25.Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-11-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident without pressure-related skin impairment did not develop a pressure injury for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. Following the development of a pressure ulcer, no initial assessment was documented, and no documented treatment was given for 4 days and interventions were not routinely documented as completed by the plan of care. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 12 developing a facility acquired stage III pressure ulcer (Full-thickness skin loss with damage to subcutaneous tissue. The ulcer may extend into the subcutaneous tissue layer. Granulation tissue and epibole [rolled wound edges] are often present. No exposure of bone, tendon, or muscle. The sore looks like a crater and may be foul-smelling on the coccyx that led to a colonization of MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in the wound. (Resident 12) Finding includes: During an observation and interview on 11/7/24 at 12:20 P.M., Resident 12 was lying in bed on a pressure reducing air mattress. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans and follow interventions to reduce the risk of falls for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. This deficient practice resulted in a fall with fractures requiring hospitalization and a fall with a closed head injury requiring hospitalization. (Resident M, Resident P). Findings include: 1. On 9/19/23 at 1:13 P.M., Resident M's clinical record was reviewed. Resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, and Diabetes Mellitus. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/14/23, indicated Resident M had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of 2 or more staff for bed mobility and transfers and a total assistance of 2 or more staff for toileting and bathing, and had no falls since the prior MDS assessment on 4/5/23. Current physician orders included, but was not limited to: Low bed at all times while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-17 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen manager met required qualifications for 1 of 1 dietary manager qualifications reviewed. (Food Services Director) Findings include:During an interview on 2/9/26 at 9:30 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated that she was currently enrolled in the course for dietary manager. She indicated that she missed passing the test by 1 point in 2024 and had to wait to re-enroll and take the course. On 2/9/26 at 2:00 P.M., the manager produced an invoice where she had just registered for the class on [DATE] at 12:00 P.M.On 2/12/26 at 11:00 A.M., the employee record for the Food Service Manager indicated she started her role on 1/2/26.During an interview on 2/13/26 at 8:55 P.M., the Administrator indicated that the dietary manager should be certified and during the survey 2/9/26-2/13/26.On 2/17/26 at 1:55 P.M., the Administrator provided a current, non-dated copy of the [Facility Name] Job Description for the Director of Food Services.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-17 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the required staff were present at the monthly Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) and Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings related to the Infection Preventionist and Medical Director, or designee, and Director of Nursing not being present. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility.Finding includes:During an interview on 2/17/26 at 11:31 A.M., the Administrator indicated the QAA/QAPI committee met monthly. Monthly attendance records of meetings were requested. On 2/17/26 at 2:27 P.M., the Administrator provided QAPI committee meeting attendance sheets for the following dates: 2/20/25 (Infection Preventionist and Director of Nursing not present) 3/19/25 (Infection Preventionist and Director of Nursing not present) 4/22/25 (Infection Preventionist and Director of Nursing not present) 7/28/25 (Infection Preventionist and Medical Director not present) 10/16/25 (Infection Preventionist and Medical Director not present) 1/12/26 (Infection Preventionist not present) 1/16/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-17 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a designated infection preventionist was onsite to implement programs and activities to prevent and control infections. Finding includes: During the entrance conference on 2/9/26 at 10:27 A.M., the Administrator indicated the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) worked from another building. On 2/12/26 at 1:59 P.M., the IP's employee file was reviewed. The Infection Control Nurse job description included duties such as: Make rounds to nursing units for the purpose of case findings, review of environmental sanitation procedures, and supervision of isolation precautions/practices. Visit isolated residents as necessary to ensure that established isolation precautions and aseptic technique are followed. Works in office area(s) as well as throughout the facility. During an interview on 2/13/26 at 9:38 A.M., the IP indicated she worked from another building and came to the facility monthly for QAPI meetings and staff in-services related to infection control. On 2/17/26 at 12:47 P.M., the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly secured, failed to keep insulin refrigerated until opened, and to label and date vials of tuberculin solution with open and expiration dates for 2 of 2 medication carts and the [Pharmacy Name] Medication room refrigerator. (West Medication Cart, East Medication Cart, [Pharmacy Name] Medication Room) FIndings include: 1, On 2/9/26 at 2:19 P.M., during random observation of the [NAME] Medication Cart the following was observed:1 unopened Lantus pen for Resident 26 with no open date or expiration date1 open Lispro insulin pen for Resident 4 with no open date or expiration date 2. On 2/9/26 at 2:27 P.M., during a random observation of the East Medication Cart the following was observed:1 large round white pill number N32 During an interview on 2/9/26 at 2:21 P.M., Qualified Medicine Aide (QMA) 4 indicated insulin should be refrigerated if unopened. During an interview on 2/9/26 at 2:45 P.M., QMA 5 indicated there should be no loose pills in the medication carts if there were a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a sink in a therapy restroom was safely secured to the wall and personel belongings in shared restrooms were labeled with resident names in 4 of 4 shared restrooms reviewed.( Sink in therapy area restroom, Shared restrooms between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], rooms [ROOM NUMBERS])Findings include:1. On 2/12/23 at 9:15 A.M, during random observations of restrooms, the following were observed:In the restroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]:1 bottle of shampoo with no name1 tube of toothpaste with no name2 bottles of lotion with no namesIn the restroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]:1 toothbrush with no name1 tube of toothpaste with no name3 bottles of lotionIn the restroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]:1 bottle of mouthwash with no name1 tube of toothpaste with no name 1 can of shaving cream with no nameIn the restroom between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]:1 tooth cup with no name1 tube of toothpaste with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. A care plan was not developed for residents for use of antibiotics and oxygen use. (Resident 3, Resident 34) Findings include: 1. On 2/12/2026 at 1:43 P.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, unspecified dementia, and Alzheimer's Disease. The current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/15/25, indicated Resident 3 was mildly cognitively intact. She needed supervision to eat, but required partial to moderate assistance for toileting, dressing, hygiene, and transferring. Current physician orders included but were limited to:Cipro 500 mg (Milligrams) BID for 7 d for UTI. Dated 2/7/26. A care conference was conducted on 11/5/2025 at 3:15 P.M., with the resident and Power of Attorney present. The care plan was reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions were in place for 1 of 2 resident reviewed for falls. An intervention for falls was not implemeted.(Resident 21) Finding includes:During a random observation on 2/12/26 at 9:30 A.M., there were no non-skid stripes observed on the floor of Resident 21's During a random observation on 2/13/26 at 8:37 A.M., Resident 21 was observed lying in bed, and no non-skid strips were observed on the left or right floor of the resident's bed. On 2/11/26 at 1:35 P.M., the clinical record for Resident 21 was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, personality disorder, and fracture of the nasal bones, subsequent encounter for fracture for routine healing. The current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 21 was cognitively intact. Resident 21 needed supervision with eating, but required partial to moderate assistance with dressing, mobility, and hygiene also had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented a clinical contraindication when a gradual dose reduction (GDR) was declined for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 2, Resident 4, and Resident 33).Findings include:1. On 2/12/26 at 8:53 A.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/16/25, indicated Resident 2 was moderately cognitively impaired, required partial assistance (staff do half of the work) for toileting, bathing, and transfers, and received antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, and anticonvulsant medication during the seven day lookback period. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Duloxetine HCl Capsule (Drizalma) Delayed Release Particles 30 MG (milligrams) Give one capsule by mouth two times a day related to depression, Start date 8/31/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure vaccinations were provided according to residents' informed consent for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for immunizations. A resident who consented to receive the influenza vaccine did not receive it. A resident who declined to receive the influenza vaccine did receive it. (Resident 48 and Resident 33)Findings include:1. On 2/12/26 at 10:44 A.M., Resident 33's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/13/25, indicated Resident 33 had severe cognitive impairment and received the influenza vaccination on 10/27/25.Physician orders included, but were not limited to:May have immunizations as required including, but not limited to: influenza, pneumonia, and tuberculosis (TB) (first and second step) and annual TB., dated 6/18/25Monitor resident for low grade fever, aches, redness, soreness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the plan of care for 1 of 1 residents observed for catheter care. Catheter care orders and treatments were not completed per the physician orders and the plan of care. (Resident C) Finding includes: During an observation on 3/24/25 at 12:30 P.M., Resident C was observed in the dining room in a wheelchair. Catheter tubing connected to a catheter drainage bag was clipped to the side of the wheelchair. During record review on 3/24/25 at 1:45 P.M., Resident C's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, and dementia. Resident C's most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 1/4/25, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and had an indwelling catheter. Resident C's physician orders included, but were not limited to, monitor Foley catheter output each shift, (ordered 11/18/24), acetic acid irrigation solution 60 milliliters (ml) via irrigation on time a day every Friday for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage of at least 8 hours daily. Weekend RN coverage did not include at least eight (8) hours on two occasions. Finding includes: On 3/25/25 at 10:00 A.M., during a review of the facility's nursing schedule from 3/10/25 through 3/24/25, eight (8) hours of RN coverage was not indicated by the schedule on 3/22/25 or 3/23/25. An RN was scheduled to be in the facility on 3/22/25 from 12:00 A.M. to 7:00 A.M. and on 3/23/25 from 6:30 P.M. to 12:00 A.M. During an interview on 3/25/25 at 10:20 A.M., LPN 15 indicated she worked the weekend of 3/22/25 and 3/23/25 and did not recall that the DON was in the building. LPN 15 indicated the DON was on call during the weekends but did not typically come to the facility to work a full shift. On 3/25/25 at 10:40 A.M , RN 8 provided an undated facility policy titled, Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing. The policy included, .A registered nurse provides services at least eight (8) consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven (7) days a week . This citation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored under proper temperature controls for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms reviewed. Finding includes: On 11/13/24 at 10:40 A.M., the refrigerator in the storage room was observed. The log indicated the last temperature was taken on 5/28/24. The freezer area was covered in ice. Medications in the refrigerator included, but was not limited to, insulin pens. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 10:48 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated the nursing staff should be reading the temperature of the refrigerator at least once a day and documenting it in the log. She was unaware of any reason that it wasn't being done. At that time, the refrigerator temperature was observed to be 46 degrees Fahrenheit. The range on the log sheet indicated a temperature of 33-41 degrees Fahrenheit was acceptable. On 11/14/24 at 10:44 A.M., a current non dated Medication Labeling and Storage Policy was provided by the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator and indicated The facility stores all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 residents observed during medication pass and 4 of 4 residents reviewed for use of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). A pill was dropped on the medication cart, touched with a bare hand, and administered to the resident. Residents with indwelling catheters and open wounds were not placed on precautions as indicated. (Resident 12, Resident 44, Resident 54, Resident 205, Resident 2) Findings include: 1. During an observation and interview on 11/7/24 at 12:20 P.M., Resident 12 was lying in bed on a pressure reducing air mattress. The resident indicated they had a wound on her coccyx that developed in the facility. No signage was present indicating the resident was on EBP and no personal protective equipment (PPE) was observed inside or outside the resident's room. Resident 12's physician orders included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have physician orders for the resident's immediate care for 1 of 1 resident admitted on hospice. One resident failed to have orders for hospice and oxygen. (Resident 204) Finding includes: On 11/12/24 at 9:41 A.M., Resident 204 was observed lying on a mattress on floor with a brief on and covered with sheet with O2 (oxygen) on at 2 lpm (liters per minute) per nasal cannula. On 11/12/24 at 10:26 A.M., Resident 204's clinical records were reviewed. Resident 204 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to liver cell carcinoma, abdominal pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypertension. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment was still in progress. Physician orders included, but were not limited to, the following: haloperidol lactate Concentrate 2 MG/ML (milligram/milliliter) (anxiety medication) Give 2 mg by mouth every 4 hours for Restlessness, dated 11/10/2024 lorazepam Oral Tablet (anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was completed within 14 days after admission for 1 of 5 residents reviewed that were admitted in the last 30 days. A resident admitted on [DATE] did not have a comprehensive assessment completed within 14 days of admission. (Resident 205) Finding includes: On 11/12/24 at 3:14 P.M., Resident 205's clinical records were reviewed. Resident 205 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, aphasia, depression, and gastrostomy status. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 10/24/24, was still in progress. The admission MDS assessment should have been completed on 11/7/24. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 10:29 A.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated she had two weeks to complete the admission MDS assessment. On 11/14/24 at 10:44 A.M., the MDS Coordinator provided an undated MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes Policy, which indicated 1. The assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident specific plan of care was developed for 2 of 14 resident care plans reviewed. A dependent resident was not care planned for ADL's (Activities of Daily Living) and a resident at nutritional risk was not care planned timely following an unplanned significant weight loss. (Resident 25, Resident 44) Findings include: 1. During record review on 11/8/24 at 2:00 P.M., Resident 25 diagnoses included, but was not limited to, bi-polar disorder, anxiety, and major depression. Resident 25's most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 10/12/24, indicated that the resident had a weight loss while not on a prescribed weight loss regimen. A nutritional assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was high risk. Resident 25's documented monthly weights indicated the resident experienced a significant weight loss of greater than 10 % from 3/7/24 weighing 170.9 pounds (lbs) to 146.2 lbs on 3/27/24. Resident 25's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a new diagnosis of schizophrenia followed the professionally accepted diagnostic process for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident received a diagnosis of schizophrenia without documented screening/testing or symptoms. (Resident 25) Finding includes: During an observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 9:50 A.M., Resident 25 was sitting on the bed in her room. Resident 25 was dressed, well groomed, appeared alert and oriented, and answered interview questions appropriately. During a record review on 11/8/24 at 2:00 P.M., Resident 25's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder and schizophrenia (added 12/5/23). Resident 25's most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/12/24, indicated the resident was over the age of 65 and the resident's admission/re-entry date was 1/1/23, the resident was cognitively intact, presented no behaviors, no hallucinations, and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate nutrition was maintained for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition. The registered dietitian did not document a review of a resident's significant weight loss and no plan of care was created following a nutritional assessment that indicated the resident was at risk, and no plan of care was created immediately following a significant weight loss. (Resident 25) Finding includes: During an observation and interview on 11/6/24 at 9:53 A.M., Resident 25 was sitting on the edge of her bed. Resident indicated that she had lost weight and was not on a prescribed weight loss regimen. During record review on 11/8/24 at 2:00 P.M., Resident 25 diagnoses included, but was not limited to, bi-polar disorder, anxiety, and major depression. Resident 25's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 10/12/24, indicated that the resident has a weight loss while not on a prescribed weight loss regimen. A nutritional assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolatedEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were certified as CNAs (Certified Nurse Aides) within 120 days of hire date for 3 of 10 CNAs reviewed for certification. Findings include: On 11/08/24 at 9:42 A.M., Employee Records were reviewed for licenses or certification. The following were listed as CNAs on the Employee Record form. CNA 14 hire date of 4/14/23 worked in dietary until 7/3/24 when she started working as a CNA-not certified CNA 16 hire date of 7/3/24-not certified CNA 18 hire date of 10/5/23-certified in Illinois but not certified in Indiana During an interview on 11/13/24 at 3:18 P.M., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated that CNAs have 120 days after their hire date to become certified. On 11/14/24 at 10:43 A.M., the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator indicated they did not have a policy on CNA certification. We follow the state guidelines. 3.1-14(b)
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provided RN coverage for 8 a day. The nursing schedule reviewed lacked RN coverage for at least 8 hours a day for 3 of 5 weekends reviewed. Finding includes: On 9/3/24 at at 5:30 p.m., the nursing schedule was reviewed for the dates of 8/2/24- 9/3/24. The following dates lacked RN coverage for at least 8 hours a day: 8/3/24, 8/17, 8/31/24. On 9/3/24 the Administrator indicated the schedule provided did not provide RN coverage for at least 8 hours a day every day. On 9/3/24 at 12: 21 p.m., the Administrator provided the current undated policy for departmental supervision, nursing. The policy included, but was not limited to: .2. A registered nurse provides services at least eight (8) consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven (7) days a week . 3.1-17(b)(3)
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete thorough assessments and to provide behavioral monitoring for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for behaviors. Lack of monitoring led to an altercation between residents. (Resident K, Resident H) Findings include: 1. On 11/3/23 at 8:25 A.M., Resident K's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, pseudobulbar effect, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. The most recent annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 10/3/23, indicated Resident K was cognitively intact, required limited assistance of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, eating, and toileting, and had no behaviors. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Venlafaxine HCl ER Oral Capsule Extended Release 24 Hour 150 mg (milligrams) - Give 1 capsule by mouth in the morning related to major depressive disorder, dated 9/28/23 Nuedexta Capsule 20-10 mg (dextromethorphan-quinidine) - Give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment. for 1 of 1 laundry areas and 3 of 3 resident halls. Washers had debris build up, floors had debris build up, and point of contact water temperatures were over 122 degrees F (Fahrenheit). Findings include: 1. On 9/20/23 8:22 A.M., the laundry room was observed. A washer was observed to have debris build up under the lid, a washer door was observed to have debris build up, the back of the washer had scale build up, the plastic piping behind the washer had debris build up, and the service hallway was observed to have debris build up along the walls. On 9/20/23 at 8:30 A.M., Laundry Aide 2 indicated she tries to clean the washers daily, and the build up on the back of the washer is from the (name of town) water. On 9/21/23 at 1:20 P.M., Housekeeper 2 indicated the floor is swept daily on the service hall, mopped if needed. 2. On 9/18/23 from 11:05 A.M. to 11:51 A.M., the following water temperatures…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 16, Resident 27, Resident 38) and lacked documentation of care plan conferences being completed for 11 of 13 residents reviewed for care plan conferences (Resident 1, Resident 14, Resident 16, Resident 20, Resident 46, Resident 7, Resident 22, Resident M, Resident S, Resident F, Resident P) Findings include: 1. On 9/22/23 at 8:15 A.M., Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD and bipolar disease. The most current quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/12/23, indicated Resident 27 was cognitively intact and needed supervision with the assistance of 1 for mobility, transfers, and eating. Progress notes indicated Resident 27 was hospitalized for suicidal ideation on 9/12/23 and returned on 9/13/23. Current care plans included, but were not limited to: The resident has a mood problem r/t (related to) disease process anxiety that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity was respected for 2 of 2 residents during 3 random observations. (Resident P, Resident 48) Findings include: 1. On 9/20/23 at 8:38 A.M., Hospitality Aide (HA) 10 indicated Resident P was already up because she's a feeder. At that time, Resident P was observed in the common area with other residents within hearing distance. On 9/21/23 at 9:53 A.M., the Social Services Director (SSD) indicated Resident P did not have teeth and that she is a feed. At that time, she was in her office, and residents could be heard just outside in the dining area. 2. On On 9/22/23 at 9:35 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 25 was observed walking toward Resident 48 in the common area while speaking with him. LPN 25 indicated to Resident 48 I just can't stop what I'm doing to help you all the time, then walked away from the resident. On 9/22/23 at 2:35 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated staff should not refer to residents as feeders. On 9/22/23 at 2:39 P.M., the DON provided a current non-dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify appropriate parties after a significant change in resident status for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for insulin and 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident T, Resident P) Findings include: 1. On 9/18/23 at 10:52 A.M., Resident T indicated her blood sugars had been running high lately. On 9/19/23 at 11:40 A.M., Resident T's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Diabetes Mellitus. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/15/23, indicated no cognitive impairment. Resident T was totally dependent of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and bathing. Insulin had been administered 7 of 7 days of the look back period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Insulin Aspart FlexPen 100 UNIT/ML (milliliter) Solution pen-injector, Inject as per sliding scale: if 201 - 250 = 6 u (units); 251 - 300 = 9 u; 301 - 350 = 12 u; 351 - 400 = 15 u; 401+ = 18 u and call M.D. (medical doctor), if not reduced, subcutaneously…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment was completed accurately for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for insulin. (Resident 7, Resident P, Resident F) Findings include: 1. On 9/20/23 at 11:10 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, hypertension, edema, and permanent atrial fibrillation. The most recent quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 7/3/23, indicated Resident 7 had moderate cognitive impairment and did not receive an anticoagulant or diuretic during the 7 day look back period (6/26/23 - 7/3/23). Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Rivaroxaban (an anticoagulant medication) Oral Tablet 20 MG (milligrams) - Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to permanent atrial fibrillation, dated 2/5/23 Spironolactone (a diuretic medication) Tablet 25 MG - Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for edema related to congestive heart failure, dated 9/24/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for insulin. A resident did not receive insulin as ordered, and the physician was not notified of blood sugars over 400 as ordered. (Resident T) Finding includes: On 9/18/23 at 10:52 A.M., Resident T indicated her blood sugars had been running high lately, and she was unsure why. She indicated at that time the facility did not offer a diabetic diet, and expected diabetic residents to know what they could and couldn't eat. She indicated she received the same food as all other residents, and had not received education related to what she should and should not eat to regulate her blood sugar. On 9/19/23 at 11:40 A.M., Resident T's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Diabetes Mellitus. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/15/23, indicated no cognitive impairment. Resident T was totally dependent of two staff for bed mobility, transfers, toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for Respiratory Care. Care plans and orders were not revised, and tubing and humidification bottle changes were not documented. (Resident 14, Resident 46, Resident 7) Findings include: 1. On 9/18/23 at 9:48 A.M., Resident 14's oxygen concentrator was observed to have no water in the humidification bottle and the tubing was not dated. On 9/18/23 at 10:36 A.M., Resident 46 was observed wearing a nasal cannula that was not dated. On 9/20/23 at 9:00 A.M., Resident 46 was observed wearing a nasal cannula that was not dated On 9/20/23 at 9:10 A.M., Resident 14's oxygen concentrator was observed to have no water in the humidification bottle and the tubing was not dated. On 9/20/23 at 9:30 A.M., Resident 14's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 14's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and atrial fibrillation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain their highest level of well-being for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia care. (Resident F) Finding includes: On 9/20/23 at 8:35 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 indicated Resident F had behaviors of leaving her room and getting into bed with other residents especially at night. She indicated an alarm box was placed at the top of her door with a motion sensor to alert staff when she was leaving her room at night, but it had not worked well. She indicated she was unsure what they were going to do as a new intervention. On 9/21/23 at 8:41 A.M., Resident F was observed wandering in Resident T's room. On 9/22/23 at 9:25 A.M., Resident F was observed lying in bed. An alarm box was observed hanging from the side rail, with a cord going under the resident. The lights on the box were not lit. At that time, LPN 25 indicated she was unable to tell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for insulin and 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Residents' as needed anti-anxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days (Resident 7, Resident T. Resident P). Findings include: 1. On 9/20/23 at 11:10 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, generalized anxiety disorder. Resident 7 was admitted on [DATE]. The most recent quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 7/3/23, indicated Resident 7 had moderately impaired cognition and an anti-anxiety medication was administered for 7 of 7 days during the look back period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to, the following: Hydroxyzine HCl (an antianxiety medication) tablet 25mg (milligrams) - Give 25 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for itching, dated 5/29/23 with no end date documented. There was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental services were provided for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dental. Residents were not referred to a dentist for acute dental pain or to obtain replacement dentures. (Resident 22, Resident P) Findings include: 1. On 9/19/23 at 9:24 A.M., Resident 22 indicated he had dental pain and was told he was on a list to see a dentist, but hadn't seen anyone yet. On 9/20/23 at 9:07 A.M., Resident 22's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Diabetes Mellitus, and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. The most recent quarterly MDS Assessment (Minimum Data Set), dated 8/10/23, indicated Resident 22 was cognitively intact and had no dental pain. A progress note, date 12/24/22, indicated the resident had a bad tooth and the gum surrounding it was red, swollen, and painful. The note indicated it had been reported to the MD (Medical Doctor) and an appointment would be scheduled with the dentist as soon as possible after the holiday weekend. Documentation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 1 trays tested for temperature. Finding includes: On 9/20/23 at 12:15 P.M., a test tray was obtained. The following temperatures were indicated: Meat loaf -114.7 degrees F (Fahrenheit) Peas and Carrots 110.0 degrees F Potatoes 112.4-degrees F On 9/18/23 at 9:41 A.M., Resident 7 complained of hot foods not hot. On 9/18/23 at 10:12 A.M., Resident 31 complained of hot foods not hot. On 9/18/23 at 10:52 A.M., Resident 11 complained of breakfast being cold. On 9/18/23 at 10:49 A.M., Resident 20 complained the food was cold. On 9/18/23 at 11:26 A.M., Resident 27 indicated she did not like the food because of the temperature variation. During an interview on 9/22/23 at 10:47 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated the temperature for food should be 135 degrees when plated. On 9/22/23 at 10:50 A.M., the Dietary Manager provided a current Food Preparation and Service policy, undated, and indicated food service employees shall prepare and serve food in a manner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was done for 2 of 6 observations of medication administration (Resident L, Resident B) and 1 of 1 observation of a dressing change (Resident T), and the facility failed to ensure toothbrushes were labeled and covered for 1 random observation. Finding includes: 1. On 9/18/23 at 9:14 A.M., LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) 2 was observed to prepare and administer medications to Resident B. Resident B was standing beside the medication cart. No hand hygiene was observed before or after administering the medications. 2. On 9/18/23 at 9:29 A.M., LPN 2 was observed to prepare Resident L's medications, put them in a drawer, lock the cart, leave the medication cart and walk to the medication room. LPN 2 was observed to come back to the cart, unlock it, obtain the prepared medications, go to Resident L's room and administer the medications to Resident L. No hand hygiene was done before preparing or administering the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide training to staff assigned to supervise residents who smoke for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for smoking. A resident violated the facility's smoking policy and the designated staff were not trained in how to handle the situation. (Resident 22) Finding includes: On 9/19/23 at 11:03 A.M., Resident 22 was observed walking out to the smoking area with cigarettes in his hand. Housekeeper 3 handed out cigarettes from individual containers to other residents who smoke, but did not hand cigarettes to Resident 22. Resident 22 was observed smoking. There was not an individual container labeled with Resident 22's name in the box. At that time, Housekeeper 3 indicated Resident 22 kept his cigarettes in his room. On 9/20/23 at 8:59 A.M., Laundry Aide 2 was observed handing out cigarettes to residents. Resident 22 was not handed cigarettes by staff and was observed walking outside with 2 cigarettes in his hand. On 9/20/23 at 9:07 A.M., Resident 22's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-09-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage was disposed of properly for 2 of 2 dumpsters observed on the northwest side of the building. The dumpster was left open and trash bags were not closed and were on the ground around the dumpster. Finding includes: On 9/18/23 at 11:03 A.M., the dumpsters outside of the dining room entrance were observed uncovered. The dumpsters were filled to the top with black plastic trash bags filled with garbage. There were 18 black garbage bags on the ground that were visible with more garbage bags underneath. Some of the garbage bags were not closed. There were flies and bees swarming around the garbage and dumpsters. On 9/21/23 at 8:19 A.M., the dumpster outside of the dining room entrance was observed uncovered. The lids were not fully closed with a black garbage bag half in and half out of one of the dumpsters. On 9/11/23 at 11:15 A.M., the Administrator indicated all trash bags should be tied closed, all trash should be in the receptacle, and the dumpster lid should be closed. He indicated that trash should not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-09-25 · tag F0851 — widespreadElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was sufficiently staffed for 1 of 1 quarters reviewed. Low weekend staffing was triggered by the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) PB&J. (Payroll Based Journal) (April, May, June, 2023) Finding includes: On 9/18/23 at 9:00 A.M., the CMS [NAME] Report was reviewed. The PB&J Data Report for Quarter 3, 2023 (April 1- June 30) indicated: Excessively Low Weekend Staffing was triggered. On 9/21/23 at 1:57 P.M., the Administrator provided the nursing schedules for the third quarter weekends for April, May, June, 2023. The Administrator indicated the facility was not able to provide the exact dates that low weekend staffing triggered on the PB&J. The Administrator indicated he and the DON reviewed the weekend schedules for the third quarter and flagged the days they thought were low staffing compared to the census. The weekend staffing schedules were reviewed and the following dates were flagged for low weekend staffing: Saturday 4/15/23 Sunday 4/16/23 Saturday 4/22/23 Sunday 4/23/23 Saturday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$253,955 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $200,690 — penalty dated 2026-02-17
- $20,400 — penalty dated 2025-09-16
- $24,674 — penalty dated 2024-11-14
- $8,191 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-12 for 1 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-25 for 30 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| CLAXTON, RYAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/27/2025 |
| TRANSCENDENT HEALTHCARE, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2014 |
| TRANSCENDENT HEALTHCARE OF BOONVILLE-NORTH REAL ESTATE, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2014 |
| TRANSCENDENT HEALTHCARE REHABILITATION SERVICES, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 35% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155801. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.