Hutsonwood At Brazil

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 86 beds and averages 73.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.29 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide range of motion or appropriate interventions for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for range of motion (Residents 69 and 12) resulting in actual harm when a cognitively impaired dependent resident developed contractures of the left hand and arm (Resident 69). Findings include:1. On 1/5/26 at 10:00 a.m., during initial observation, Resident 69 was sitting in a high back wheelchair in the lounge area. Observed the left arm bent upwards at the elbow and the left hand contracted. Nails were pressed into the palm of her hand. No anticontracture devices observed on hand or arm. On 1/6/26 at 10:29 a.m., resident observed sitting in wheelchair in lounge area and noted to have contracture of the left hand and lower left arm. No anticontracture device observed in place. On 1/6/26 at 9:34 a.m., during an interview Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) (10) indicated Resident 69 walked with therapy for a time but acted like she was afraid and they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control measures when handling clothing and waste for prevention of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. (Residents B, C, D, and E). This deficient practice had the potential to affect 75 of the 75 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:During a random observation on 5/11/26 at 11:05 a.m., Receptionist 1 was observed walking out of Resident C and Resident D's room, wearing gloves and holding a pile of clothing in her hands. The clothing was not in a bag and would brush the front of her shirt as she walked. During the observation, Receptionist 1 indicated the clothing was some dirty clothes she was taking to the soiled utility. She indicated she could not find a bag to place them in, so she just donned gloves and was carrying them.1. During an interview on 5/11/26 at 11:50 a.m., Resident C indicated he had not observed staff putting on a gown when they entered his room to care for him. The staff do perform…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
  Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff were trained and competent in infection control measures to prevent food borne illness during 4 observations of the dietary department. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 77 of 77 residents who received food and/or drinks from the kitchen. Findings include: On 1/5/26 at 10:45 a.m., during a kitchen observation with the Dietary Manager, the dishwasher temperature was not within the recommended range for sanitation. Review of the temperature logs indicated the logs were incorrect. The Dietary Manager confirmed the documentation had been recorded inaccurately by the employee. On 1/5/26 at 11:00 a.m., observed the Dietary Manager wash her hands and dried hands on rolled damp paper towels that were on top of the counter in the food prep area. She indicated the dispenser batteries were low, and the paper towel dispenser was not working. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the paper towels were not sanitary. On 1/5/26 at 12:38 p.m., during a follow up in the dietary department…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on observations, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure frozen foods were dated prior to use and failed to ensure dishwasher was sanitizing dishes and utensils at the recommended temperatures for sanitation during 6 dietary observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 77 of 77 residents who receive food and drinks from the kitchen. B. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure ice was distributed in a safe and sanitary manner during 1 of 1 lunch meal service observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that were being served in the main dining room on 1/5/26. Findings include: A. On 1/5/26 at 10:45 a.m., during a kitchen observation with the Dietary Manager the following was noted. The wash temperature of the dishwasher reached 140 degrees. The rinse temperature reached 162 degrees. The Dietary manager indicated the dishwasher was not at the appropriate temperature. Review of the temperature logs for breakfast on 1/5/26 indicated the temperature had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident personal information was protected from exposure, during 1 of 2 medication administration observations (Residents 34, 78, and 8). Findings include:During observation of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 8, on 1/8/26, the following was observed: a. On 1/8/26 at 8:28 a.m., LPN 8 set up the medications to administer to Resident 34. She was observed to use the desk computer to rectify the medications. At the same time, she indicated she was using the desk computer at the nurse's station because the laptop on the medication cart would not stay charged. She left the nurse's station to administer the medications and left the resident's personal information exposed on the computer screen without closing or covering the screen. b. On 1/8/26 at 8:41 a.m., LPN 8 set up the medications to administer to Resident 78. She was observed to use the desk computer to rectify the medications. She left the nurse's station to administer the medications and left the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to initiate or revise interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 12). Findings include:On 1/5/26 at 2:00 p.m., during an initial observation, Resident 12 was observed sleeping in bed. The resident was lying on her back with her head hyperextended. The bed was in the low position. A padded mat was on the floor next to the left side of the bed. The call light was lying on the foot of the bed. On 1/9/26 at 10:00 a.m., the medical record of Resident 12 was reviewed. The most recent admission to the facility was on 9/25/25. admission diagnosis included, but was not limited to, fracture of right femur (bone fracture of the right hip), pain in right hip and Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/1/25, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired and was dependent upon staff for all daily care needs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had physician's order and a care plan for an indwelling urinary catheter (a thin, flexible tube left inside the bladder, typically through the urethra, to continuously drain urine into an external collection bag), failed to ensure the catheter's external urine collection bag (catheter bag) and tubing were prevented from contact with the floor, and failed to ensure the catheter bag was maintained in a dignified manner, for 1 of 1 resident observed for urinary catheter (Resident 21). Findings include: During an initial observation of Resident 21, on 1/6/26 at 9:14 a.m., the resident's catheter bag was observed in contact with the floor. The resident was sitting in her wheelchair next to her bed. During a random observation, on 1/7/26 at 9:04 a.m., the resident was observed in her room in her wheelchair. The resident's catheter tubing was in contact with the floor. During a random observation, on 1/7/26 at 1:06 p.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a resident's medications in a timely manner after their admission to the facility for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services (Resident B). Findings include:Resident B's record was reviewed on 1/9/26 at 10:14 a.m. Census information indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated December 2025, included the following information. -A physician's order, dated 12/19/25, indicated administer ascorbic acid (supplement) 250 milligrams (mg) by mouth daily for muscle wasting. The medication was not administered, on 12/19/25, related to pharmacy delivery tonight. The medication was not administered, on 12/27/25, 12/28/25, and 12/31/25, related to awaiting from pharmacy. The MAR lacked documentation the physician or the pharmacy were contacted regarding the missed administrations. -A physician's order, dated 12/19/25, administer enoxaparin (blood thinner) 30 mg/0.3 milliliters…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure documented physician rationale for a declination of a pharmacy recommendation and failed to ensure a pharmacy recommendation was addressed in a timely manner for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 11 and 13). Findings include:1. Resident 11 record was reviewed on 1/6/26 at 3:46 p.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus (a group of metabolic diseases marked by consistently high blood sugar (glucose) due to the body's inability to produce or properly use insulin), overactive bladder (a common condition marked by a sudden, uncontrollable urge to urinate, often leading to frequent bathroom trips, and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (your kidneys have moderate damage, filtering blood less effectively, leading to waste buildup and potential complications like high blood pressure, anemia (low iron), and fatigue). Facility census information indicated Resident 11…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to assess a resident for pain and administered narcotic medication without documentation of pain symptoms for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident 13). Findings include:On 1/5/26 at 11:00 a.m., observed Resident 13 sleeping in bed. He was not restless and was sleeping soundly. No outward signs of pain observed. On 1/5/26 at 12:30 p.m., observed resident sitting in a high back wheelchair during the noon meal service. Resident was relaxed and no visual indicators of pain noted. The resident was relaxed and looked comfortable On 1/7/26 at 10:40 a.m., the medical record of Resident 13 was reviewed. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. admission diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hemiplegia (a loss of strength in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a relatively mild loss of strength) following cerebral infarction (stroke), dementia (the loss of cognitive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 3 of 7 residents observed during the medication pass. There were 26 opportunities for errors observed with 3 medication errors, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.54 percent (Residents 34, 78, and 8). Findings include:1a. On 1/8/26 at 8:28 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 8 administered medications to Resident 34. The medications included, but were not limited to, fluticasone propionate (Flonase) 50 micrograms (mcg) nasal spray (a corticosteroid medication used to relieve allergy symptoms) 1 spray to each nostril two times daily. The LPN shook the nasal spray container and placed the tip into the resident's left nostril and sprayed. She then placed the tip of the nasal spray into the resident's right nostril and sprayed it. The LPN failed to instruct the resident to pinch off his opposite nostril as she administered the nasal spray. An active physician's order, reconciled on 1/9/26 at 1:57 p.m., indicated to administer 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $841K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN