George Ade Memorial Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 61.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents, related to one staff member (CNA 1) assisting a resident with a shower who was care planned for two staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's) resulting in the resident falling in the shower and receiving an abrasion to the right knee and a laceration to the right eyebrow that required four sutures. The resident also had a decline in normal functioning related to ambulation after the fall and was diagnosed eight days later with a fractured right hip for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. (Resident D)Finding includes: Resident D's record was reviewed on 11/12/25 at 1:18 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, right hip fracture, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and moderate intellectual disabilities.A Care Plan, dated 7/16/25, indicated a self-care deficit was present related to the impaired cognitive status. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was maintained related to an uncovered urinary catheter bag and a resident's choice was honored for bathing for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity. (Residents G and 57)Findings include: 1.On 3/3/26 at 9:53 a.m. Resident G was observed lying in bed. A urinary catheter bag was hanging from the side of the bed with visible urine in the bag. There was no cover over the bag, and the bag was visible from the hallway. On 3/3/26 at 2:47 p.m. Resident G was observed lying in bed. A urinary catheter bag was hanging from the side of the bed with visible urine in the bag. There was no cover over the bag, and the bag was visible from the hallway. On 3/4/26 at 11:23 a.m. Resident G was observed lying in bed. A urinary catheter bag was hanging from the side of the bed with visible urine in the bag. There was no cover over the bag, and the bag was visible from the hallway. Record review for Resident G was completed on 3/4/26 at 2:23 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, obstructive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was accurately completed related to a Wanderguard alarm (wearable device that alarms when approaching a restricted area) not documented for a resident with history of wandering for 1 of 21 MDS assessments reviewed. (Resident 37) Finding includes:The record for Resident 37 was reviewed on 3/3/26 at 8:59 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and Parkinson's disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/26/26, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required partial to moderate assistance with shower, personal hygiene, and taking footwear on and off. The alarm assessment was marked as 0 indicating not used. The Physician's Order, dated 12/15/25, indicated Wanderguard to right wrist. Monitor for proper placement every shift and functioning daily. During an interview on 3/5/26 at 1:44 p.m., the MDS Coordinator indicated she thought the Wanderguard was discontinued. When asked for policy regarding MDS, she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to update care plans to reflect the resident's transfer status for 1 of 19 resident care plans reviewed. (Resident 16)Finding includes:On 3/2/26 at 3:18 p.m., Resident 16 was observed lying in bed. The resident indicated she required a Hoyer lift (mechanical device to transfer an individual) for staff to transfer her out of bed. Sometimes the facility was short staffed and they would not always have 2 staff members to transfer her out of bed.Record review for Resident 16 was completed on 3/3/26 at 2:14 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to stroke and anxiety.The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/2/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was dependent on staff for transfers.A Care Plan, dated 12/5/24 and revised 3/2/26, indicated the resident had a self care deficit related to impaired mobility. An intervention included for staff to assist with transfers.A Care Plan, dated 12/6/24 and revised 3/2/26, indicated the resident was at risk for falls due to impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide activities to support the psychosocial well-being of cognitively impaired, dependent residents for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities. (Resident H)Finding includes:On 3/2/26 at 10:18 a.m., Resident H was observed lying flat in bed with her eyes open staring at the ceiling. The bed had half side rails with padding on them and the curtain was pulled. The resident was unable to see out into the hall as her bed was furthest from the door. There was no television or music on at the time of observation. The resident was picking at her hair repeatedly. There was an activity occurring in the dining room at the time. On 3/2/26 at 2:59 p.m. and 3:10 p.m., Resident H was observed lying flat in bed with her eyes open staring at the ceiling. The bed had half side rails with padding on them and the curtain was pulled. The resident was unable to see out into the hall as her bed was furthest from the door. There was no television or music on at the time of observation. The resident was picking at her hair…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services related to not notifying the physician when a resident was having frequent diarrhea for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for constipation/diarrhea. (Resident 16) The facility also failed to ensure physician's orders were followed related to a resident's catheter securement device for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for catheters. (Resident 52) Findings include:1. On 3/2/26 at 3:18 p.m., Resident 16 was observed lying in bed. The resident indicated she had been having episodes of diarrhea for a while. Record review for Resident 16 was completed on 3/3/26 at 2:14 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to stroke and anxiety. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/2/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was dependent on staff for transfers and toileting hygiene. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The March 2026 Physician's Order Summary (POS) indicated an order for loperamide (antidiarrheal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment for limited range of motion related to splints not in place for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion (ROM). (Residents G and H)Findings include:1.On 3/2/26 at 11:10 a.m., Resident G was observed sitting in his wheelchair in his room. There was no splint in place to his left hand. The splint was observed on his bed. On 3/3/26 at 2:47 p.m., Resident G was observed lying in bed. There was no splint in place to his left hand. The splint was observed on the seat of his wheelchair. On 3/3/26 at 11:24 a.m., Resident G was observed lying in bed. There was no splint in place to his left hand. The splint was observed on the seat of his wheelchair. He indicated he had a splint that he would wear to on his left hand sometimes. He was unable to put it on himself and unsure when he was supposed to wear it. The resident's record was reviewed on 3/4/26 at 2:23 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia left non dominant side. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with adequate equipment to prevent falls for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident D)Finding includes:Resident D's record was reviewed on 3/3/26 at 3:10 p.m.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/16/25, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff for showering/bathing.An Event: Safety Events - Fall, dated 3/3/26 at 10:27 a.m., indicated the resident had a fall in the shower room while receiving a shower. There were no injuries. A Progress Note, dated 3/3/26, indicated the shower chair tipped in the shower and the resident was lowered to the floor by the CNA. The resident did not hit her head. There were no injuries. The physician and Director of Nursing were notified.During an interview on 3/3/26 at 3:40 p.m., CNA 4 indicated she did not typically work on the unit that Resident D resides on, so for care questions she had to rely on the other aids that were there most often. She was told that the resident usually had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed related to a fluid restriction for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hydration. (Resident 52)Finding includes: Resident 52's record was reviewed on 3/4/26 at 11:31 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, heart failure.The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/2/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Care Plan, revised on 3/3/26, indicated the resident was on a fluid restriction. Interventions included, but were not limited to, fluid restrictions as ordered and monitor and record intake.A Physician's Order, dated 3/1/26, indicated document fluid intake with medication every shift. A Physician's Order, dated 3/2/26, indicated diet: regular and 1,200 milliliters (ml) per day fluid restriction. The Intake: Fluids documentation section indicated the resident had 1,030 ml on 3/1/26, 1,080 ml on 3/2/26, and 900 ml on 3/3/26. The March 2026 Medication Administration Record indicated the resident received 510 ml of fluid on 3/1/26, 540 ml of fluid on 3/2/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care related to oxygen administration, implementing physician's orders, and testing for a resident with respiratory symptoms for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 32 and 12)Findings include:1.On 3/3/26 at 9:39 a.m. Resident 32 was observed seated at a table in the Main Dining Room. Oxygen was in place via nasal cannula and the portable tank was set at 2 liters. On 3/3/26 at 2:52 p.m. Resident 32 was observed in the Main Dining Room doing a coloring activity. Oxygen was in place via nasal cannula and the portable tank was set at 2 liters. On 3/4/26 at 11:29 a.m. Resident 32 was observed seated at a table in the Main Dining Room. Oxygen was in place via nasal cannula and the portable tank was set at 2 liters. Resident 32's record was reviewed on 3/4/26 at 11:58 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, emphysema and asthma. A Physician's Order, dated 3/1/26, indicated oxygen 2-4 liters as needed (PRN) to keep sats above 90%. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to a lack of assessments with changes in condition after a fall including pain, weight bearing, and ambulation status which delayed treatment for a fractured right hip for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident D)Finding includes:Resident D's record was reviewed on 11/12/25 at 1:18 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, right hip fracture, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and moderate intellectual disabilities.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/21/25, indicated a severely impaired cognitive status, physical behaviors and rejection of care were present for one to three days and verbal behaviors were present for four to six days. There was no impairment of the upper and lower extremities. Supervision was required for dressing and hygiene. Bathing had been refused. He was independent for bed mobility, sitting to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN