Envive Of Brookville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 50.8 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 49 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to routinely document physician-ordered daily weights for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for following physician care orders. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 6-30-26 at 11:10 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes, chronic pulmonary (lung) disease (COPD) and morbid obesity (very overweight). His most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4-8-26, indicated he was cognitively intact and was non-ambulatory, required the use of a wheelchair for mobility. Resident B's current order summary, dated 6-30-26, indicated an order was placed on 3-30-26 to obtain daily weights. The order for the daily weights failed to have parameters to notify the physician for weight gain or loss within a defined time period. Weights for Resident B were documented in the clinical record on 3-18-26, 3-30-26, 3-31-26 and 6-3-26. The majority of the dates in which weights were not obtained failed to have any documentation reflective of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and provide education on the 2025-2026 Covid-19 vaccination and maintain documentation of such for 5 of 5 residents reviewed. (Residents 3, 7, 9, 10, and 12) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 3 was reviewed on 3/27/26 at 1:15 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive, treatable lung disease, mainly caused by smoking or long-term irritant exposure, that restricts airflow and causes breathing difficulties) and hypertensive heart disease with heart failure (condition that occurs when chronic high blood pressure forces the heart to work harder, leading to thickened or weakened heart muscle that cannot pump effectively). She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no 2025-2026 Covid-19 vaccination information in the clinical record to indicate she accepted or refused the vaccination or was provided education regarding the vaccination. 2. The clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained dignity by answering call lights in a timely manner, resulting in incontinence leading to residents feeling uncomfortable and embarrassed for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident F and Resident E) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident F was reviewed during the survey. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, obstructive uropathy (a structural or functional blockage of urine flow anywhere along the urinary tract, from the kidneys to the urethra) and weakness. The most recent care plan for Resident F indicated they needed assistance with moderate assistance with toileting. The interventions for their bowel continence included, but were not limited to, assisting to sit on the toilet and providing toileting at the same time every day. The most current minimum data set assessment indicated Resident F was cognitively intact, did not exhibit behaviors, and was frequently incontinent of bowel. An interview completed during the survey with Resident F indicated they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from misappropriation of their narcotic medication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for misappropriation. (Resident B) Findings include:A facility reported incident, dated 1/29/26, indicated a nurse noted a sleeve of 6 narcotic pills were missing from the narcotic box that belonged to Resident B. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 3/25/2026 at 2:21 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic pain syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome (chronic functional gastrointestinal disorder affecting the large intestine, characterized by abdominal pain, bloating, and diarrhea or constipation), and idiopathic chronic gout (a severe, long-term form of inflammatory arthritis). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/8/26, indicated Resident B was cognitively intact for decision making, used opioid medication, received scheduled and prn (as needed) pain medications, had pain frequently, and occasionally their pain would interfere with daily activities. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist a resident with feeding who had weight loss for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 8) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 8 was reviewed on 03/25/2026 at 2:23 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, epilepsy, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), eating difficulties, and schizoaffective disorder (chronic mental health condition combining hallucinations, delusions, and disorganized speech with mania or depression). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/30/25, indicated Resident 8 had severe cognitive impairment though usually understood others, had no behaviors for rejection of care, needed partial/moderate assistance to use suitable utensils to bring food and/or liquid to the mouth and swallow. Resident 8 had a loss of liquids/solids from mouth when eating or drinking, held food in mouth/cheeks or residual food in mouth after meals, and coughed or choked during meals or when swallowing medications. The Electronic Health Record (EHR)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store respiratory supplies correctly at the bedside for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 21) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 21 was reviewed on 3/25/2026 at 1:12 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD/a progressive, irreversible lung disease that restricts airflow and makes breathing difficult) hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid gland producing insufficient hormones), and anxiety disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/24/26, indicated Resident 21 was cognitively intact. During an observation on 3/24/26 at 11:40 a.m., Resident 21 had an oxygen nebulizer with tubing and mask openly lying on an empty bed. The oxygen mask was not in a bag. During an observation and interview on 3/25/26 at 1:23 p.m., Resident 21 had the nebulizer and oxygen tubing and mask lying on an empty bed, covered with a blanket. Resident 21 indicated the nebulizer and mask usually always lay on the bed close to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to schedule an oral surgeon appointment, as referred, and follow-up on a recommendation for a new toothbrush and water flosser for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dental status and services. (Resident 12) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 3/26/26 at 2:26 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a progressive, treatable lung disease mainly caused by smoking or long-term irritant exposure that restricts airflow and causes breathing difficulties) and nicotine dependence (a chronic brain disorder where tobacco use becomes compulsory, causing intense cravings, failed quit attempts, and severe withdrawal symptoms). An interview was conducted with Resident 12 on 3/24/26 at 2:20 p.m. He indicated he needed to see the dentist, because he had holes in his teeth. He thought he was supposed to have an appointment scheduled already. The dental consultation, dated 3/18/26, indicated a recommendation for a specific type of rechargeable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatments were completed and documented on night shift and a resident had a fall intervention in place for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls. (Residents C, G, 7, 9, 24, and 36) Findings include: 1. a) The clinical record 7 was reviewed on 2/25/25 at 12:47 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease. The 1/12/25 Accident & Incident Report and Investigation indicated Resident 7 had a fall from his wheelchair at the nurse's station on 1/12/25 at 6:51 p.m. He attempted to stand up. A CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) ran to try and catch him but was unable to reach him in time. He fell, striking his head on a bedside table. He suffered a laceration to the top of his head, a laceration to his top lip, and was sent to the emergency room. The 1/12/25 emergency department notes indicated he had a large laceration to his scalp that was repaired with a total of nineteen staples and a smaller laceration to his upper lip that was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and document target behaviors for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents C, G, 7, 9, and 36) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 2/25/25 at 12:47 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression and insomnia. The 1/29/25 care plan indicated he used an antidepressant medication related to depression. An intervention was to administer the medication as ordered by the physician and monitor/document side effects and effectiveness every shift. The 2/11/25 care plan indicated he had a diagnosis of insomnia. The physician's orders indicated to administer one 50 milligrams (mg) tablet of sertraline daily, effective 1/9/25, for depression and one 5 mg tablet of melatonin at bedtime, starting 1/8/25, for insomnia/sleeplessness. They indicated to monitor for the following behaviors related to depression, starting 1/1/25: tearfulness, withdrawn, agitation, excessive crying, or social isolation, and at the end of each shift, mark the frequency of how…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for side effects of psychotropic medications, as ordered, for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents C, G, 7, 9, and 36) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 7 was reviewed on 2/25/25 at 12:47 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression. The 1/29/25 care plan indicated he used an antidepressant medication related to depression. An intervention was to administer the medication as ordered by the physician and monitor/document side effects and effectiveness every shift. The physician's orders indicated to administer one 50 milligrams (mg) tablet of sertraline daily, starting 1/9/25, for depression. They indicated to monitor for side effects of psychotropic medications every shift, starting 1/1/25. The February 2025 TAR (treatment administration record) indicated he was not monitored for side effects of psychotropic medications on night shift the entire month. 2. The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 2/27/25 at 11:14 a.m. Her diagnoses…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $813K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN