No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Brownsburg Health Care Center

1010 Hornaday Rd, Brownsburg, IN 46112 · For profit - Corporation · 160 certified beds · (317) 852-3123 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Flagged for abuseResident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$31,540 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $31,540 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-13)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1411 S Green St · (317) 852-3600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
474 Southpoint Cir · (866) 827-7575 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1016 E Main St · (317) 939-2957 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1001 S Odell St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
865 Country Walk Ct · (317) 286-1117

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.1%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight14.8%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.0%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.0%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.2%23.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine71.2%95.4%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.3%23.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.1%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.9%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine29.3%79.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.8%22.2%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.0%10.8%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.551.611.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.461.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.28U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.4%CMS range 37.4–64.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.3–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay7.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
0.63
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.37
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
59.8%
Total nursing turnover
64.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 77.7 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 82 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-13)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-28)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

44 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse between two dementia residents resulting in Resident D obtaining a laceration to the upper lip, nasal fracture, fractures to the 6th, 7th, and 8th ribs, and subsequent change in condition related to weakness from her hospitalization where she is no longer able to walk independently and requires staff assistance to be transported in a wheelchair (Residents D and E) for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse. In addition to the residents in immediate jeopardy, the facility failed to implement effective supervision and interventions to prevent resident-to-resident sexual abuse when a cognitively impaired male resident, (Resident G) entered a cognitively impaired female resident's room (Resident F) removed her pants and briefs and began to masturbate while touching her. This resulted in harm that is not immediate jeopardy for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse when Resident F was documented to have increased anxiety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to have competent and sufficient staff to administer medications and insulin timely to residents as ordered for 5 of 5 residents observed during 1 of 1 medication observation (Residents B, C, E, D, and F). Findings include:On 5/26/26 at 7:08 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 6 was observed at the medication cart. He indicated he was passing medications. The electronic medication administration record was on the computer screen for Resident B. He had medications hi-lighted in red indicating they were overdue. RN 6 prepped Resident B's medications and administered them to the resident at 7:22 p.m. RN 6 indicated he had two new admissions and was running behind. When asked if other nursing staff helped him so he wouldn't be late, he indicated he had assistance available. On 5/26/26 at 7:28 p.m., RN 6 indicated he needed to check Resident C's blood sugar that was due at 5:00 p.m. He took out the monitor and checked Resident C's blood sugar. It was 459, outside of his ordered parameters. Per his sliding scale orders, it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure falls were coded on a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident K). Findings include:Resident K's record was reviewed on 5/26/26 at 10:06 p.m. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was dated 3/2/26. A progress note, dated 3/11/26, indicated the resident had a witnessed fall in the dining room and had a laceration to the forehead and back of head. Follow-up progress notes, dated 3/11/26, indicated the resident was sent to the hospital and returned to the facility with three sutures to the left side of her forehead. A progress note, dated 3/30/26, indicated the resident fell in the bathroom and had a bruise on her forehead. A progress note, dated 4/17/26, indicated the resident stood up from the dining room table, tripped, and fell on her right side. There was no visible injury, but the resident was guarding the right lower extremity and would not straighten the leg. A progress note, dated 4/18/26, indicated the resident's power of attorney (POA) requested the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received ordered monitoring of orthostatic blood pressures and failed to ensure prompt treatment for a fracture after a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident K). Findings include:Resident K's record was reviewed on 5/26/26 at 10:06 p.m. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but were not limited to, dementia (a decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life) with mood disturbance and repeated falls. A physician's order, dated 12/8/21, indicated monitor the resident's pain on a scale of 0 to 10 every shift and document non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions for pain. A physician's order, dated 11/11/22, indicated acetaminophen (pain medication) 325 milligrams (mg), give 2 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/2/26, indicated the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. A progress note, dated 3/11/26, indicated the resident had a witnessed fall in the dining room and had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to effectively cleanse a glucometer (used to check blood sugar) after its usage for 1 of 1 glucometer observed (Residents B and G).Findings include:On 5/26/26 at 7:45 p.m., RN 6 had just finished checking Resident B's blood sugar. He brought the monitor to the cart and pulled out an alcohol prep pad with an ungloved hand and wiped down the strip insertion area for a couple of seconds. Then he left the monitor sitting on the medication cart and continued passing medications to the resident.When asked about cleaning procedures, RN 6 indicated he was out of the wipes they usually used to clean the machine.On 5/26/26 at 8:10 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) arrived and provided a tub of purple top wipes to cleanse the glucometer machine with. RN 6 placed the wipes in the bottom drawer of the medication cart.On 5/26/26 at 8:15 p.m., RN 6 went to Resident G to check his blood sugar without cleaning the monitor with the purple top wipes. RN 6 returned to the medication cart after checking Resident 6's blood sugar and pulled out the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer narcotic medication in accordance with physician's orders and manufactures instructions resulting in lethargy and increased tiredness for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident C).Findings include:During an interview on 3/31/26 at 3:15 p.m., Resident C and her daughter felt Resident C received her medication too close together causing her to be overmedicated. The resident indicated she sometimes could barely keep her eyes open and felt very fatigued. This happened off and on, but not everyday. The resident indicated her doses were not administered on time regularly, and sometimes were very late. She had spoken to the nursing staff about it, but it continued to happen sometimes. A record review for Resident C was completed on 3/31/26 at 1:38 p.m. Diagnoses included stage 3 hypertensive chronic kidney disease, polymyalgia rheumatica (an inflammatory rheumatic disease), lumbago with sciatica (low back pain (lumbago) paired with radiating pain, numbness, or tingling that travels down the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions for catheter collection bags and tubing to prevent contamination for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care (Residents B and E).Findings include: 1. During an observation on 3/31/26 at 3:19 p.m., accompanied by QMA 2, Resident B's catheter bag and tubing were observed. The resident was in bed lying on his left side. His catheter bag was covered in a pillowcase, tied at the top of the bag around the tubing, lying on the floor. The tubing was lying on the floor and rising to, and under the sheet. During the observation, QMA 2 indicated that the catheter bag and tubing should not be on the floor due to risk of contamination. She indicated the catheter bag should be secured to the bed frame, and the tubing and the bag should be off the floor.The clinical record for Resident B was completed on 3/31/26 at 11:42 a.m. Diagnoses included urinary tract infection, obstructive and reflux uropathy (urinary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide RN coverage per the facility assessment, failed to ensure adequate staffing on the memory care (dementia) unit, and failed to ensure adequate staffing to answer call lights and provide showers. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 78 of 78 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:1. Upon the survey entrance on 1/5/26 at 10:00 a.m., the Executive Director (ED) provided a copy of the Facility Assessment. Per the assessment, the facility required a minimum PPD (how many hours are spent with a patient per day) for Registered Nurses (RN) of 0.54 hours daily. A copy of the schedules requested were provided by the Executive Director (ED) on 1/5/26 at 10:33 a.m. Upon reviewing the nursing staffing schedules, the facility did not meet its minimum RN coverage PPD on the following dates: 7/27/25, 11/20/25, 12/3/25, 12/4/25, 12/5/25, 12/6/25, 1/5/26, 1/6/26, 1/7/26, 1/8/26, and 1/9/26. On 1/12/26 at 1:42 p.m. The Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) indicated there should be at least two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program to identify, analyze, and correct systemic quality and safety issues. This failure resulted in the facility's inability to prevent recurrence of known problems and contributed to harm-level and Immediate Jeopardy deficiencies. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 78 of 78 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include:During interview on 1/12/26 at 11:21 a.m., the Regional Director of Operation (RDO) and the Regional Nurse Consultant, (RNC) indicated the faculty had failed to effectively incorporate a QAPI program to help mitigate deficiencies that were identified during the survey period. The Regional Director of Operation (RDO) and the Regional Nurse Consultant, (RNC) acknowledged that under the prior administration, required corporate and facility processes for incident reporting, investigation, and interdisciplinary team (IDT) oversight were not followed. They confirmed that adverse incidents and reportable events…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity by allowing staff to refer to residents using demeaning and task-oriented labels ( feeds/feeders) during meal service and failed to ensure residents were provided the opportunity to accept or decline entry into their rooms when staff walked in without knocking or waiting for a reply. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 4 of 5 residents reviewed for dignity (Residents D, 48, 53, and 37). Findings include:1. During a dining observation on 1/5/26 at 11:59 p.m., a rolling lunch cart was brought to the secured memory care unit and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 25 and Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 15 began to pass lunch trays. As they began to pass trays out, CNA 15 asked, are there any feeds back here? LPN 25 indicated, there are three feeds, and pointed to Residents D, 48 and 53. All residents' meals were served on their plastic trays. The lunch plates, cups, and utensils were not removed and from the tray to be more homelike and less…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to identify repeated grievances and implement effective corrective actions to alleviate ongoing resident complaints related to personal care services, responsiveness to call lights, hygiene care, and staff interactions which demonstrated that corrective measures were ineffective and systemic issues were not addressed for 6 of 6 months of grievances reviewed. Findings include: On 1/9/26 at 1:14 p.m. the Director of Nursing provided copies of the previous 6 months of grievances. A review of grievances, dated July 2025 through December 2025, revealed multiple repeated complaints across residents demonstrating a pattern of unresolved systemic issues which included, but were not limited to: Call light response time and staff attitude, missed or delayed showers and complaints about ADL (activities of daily living) care, and short staffing or staffing concerns. 1. Call light response time and staff attitude. 14 of the 23 grievances were direct complaints about call lights response time and/or staff attitude. Grievances used for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 33 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving resident to resident physical abuse, sexual abuse, and misappropriation of resident's funds were thoroughly investigated, appropriately documented, and followed up by effective corrective actions for 5 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Residents D, E, F, G, and J). Findings include:1. An Indiana Department of Health facility incident report, dated 11/20/25, indicated Resident E was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. Resident D was intrusively wandering into Resident E's room when Resident E made open hand and extended arm contact with Resident D resulting in her losing her balance causing her to hit her mouth on the handrail as she fell. Resident D was assessed and noted to have a deep laceration to upper lip, nosebleed, skin tears to top of left hand and 2nd knuckle. The NP ordered to send Resident D to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. On 1/8/26 at 10:54 a.m., a copy of the incident investigation documentation was provided by the Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' comprehensive care plans were implemented to address their individual needs for 6 of 18 residents reviewed for care plan implementation (Residents D, E, F, G, 3, and 70). Findings include: 1. An Indiana Department of Health facility incident report, dated 11/20/25, indicated Resident E was involved in a resident-to-resident altercation. Resident D was intrusively wandering into Resident E's room when Resident E made open hand and extended arm contact with Resident D resulting in her losing her balance causing her to hit her mouth on the handrail as she fell. Resident D was assessed and noted to have a deep laceration to upper lip, nosebleed, skin tears to top of left hand and 2nd knuckle. The NP ordered to send Resident D to the hospital for evaluation and treatment. On 1/7/26 at 2:51 p.m., Resident D's record was reviewed. She was a long term care resident who resided on the secured memory care unit with diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide consistent, knowledgeable staffing, adequate supervision, and meaningful dementia appropriate activities on the Memory Care (MC) unit. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 14 of 14 residents residing on the Memory Care Unit. Findings include: 1. Upon initial entrance into the memory care unit on 1/5/26 at 10:30 a.m., seven residents were seated in the MC dining room with no staff present. On 1/5/26 at 10:40 a.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 13 entered the unit in a rush and indicated to the several residents gathered in the main dining/activity room, let's see what they have going on for you guys, I have no idea. She briefly looked at the posted activity calendar, then went to the nurses station and returned with a rolling cart. She indicated she was, just going to wing it, as she started passing coffee and snacks and visiting with residents. During an interview on 1/5/26 at 10:45 a.m., QMA 13 indicated she worked all over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date and remove expired medications from use for 3 of 4 medication carts observed for medication storage and 1 of 1 medication room observed for medication storage.Findings include:On 1/5/26 at 12:07 p.m., the 1,2 and 3 hall medication cart was observed. Resident 38 had an albuterol inhaler 0.83% in the cart with no date to indicate when it was opened. Hydrocortisone (steroid)cream was in the medication cart. The 400-hall medication cart was observed. Hydrocortisone cream was in the medication cart. Resident 8 had an insulin pen, Lantus in the cart with a date of 11/26/25. It expired. Diclofenac (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory pain reliever) cream was stored with Miralax (laxative) oral powder. Resident 6 had hydrocortisone cream in the medication cart. He had a Novolog (insulin) kwikpen in the cart dated 12/1/25. It was expired. The 7 and 8 hall medication room had a normal saline bottle in the refrigerator. It lacked a date to indicate when it was opened. The Unit Manager indicated the saline was expired and removed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident's advance directive documentation was accurate and consistent across her medical record and failed to ensure a physician's order was in place for a resident's advance directive wishes for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for advance directives (Residents 1 and 3). Findings include:1. On 1/6/26 at 11:47 a.m., Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. She had a Physician's Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form, dated 10/23/25, which indicated she wished to have a DNR or Do Not Resuscitate advance directive status. The current physician's order, as of the record review on 1/6/26, listed her as a full code. A corresponding Advance Directive Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 10/17/25, indicated Resident 1 as a full code. During an interview on 1/7/2026 at 1:57 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 26 indicated she was certain Resident 1 was a full code resident. After her review of the POST, RN 26 indicated that was a big discrepancy and she would need to talk with the Director of Nursing to ensure the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to reconcile a resident's medication at the time of discharge for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident 86). Findings include:On 1/7/26 at 11:39 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident 86. She had the following diagnosis which included but were not limited to chronic kidney disease, hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and weakness. Resident 86's record lacked documentation her medication reconciliation after discharge. The discharged medications unaccounted for were as follows: lantus (insulin) 100 units per milliliter (u/ml), mirtazapine (antidepressant) 15 milligram (mg), torsemide (diuretic) 20 mg, trazodone (antidepressant) 50 mg, lorazepam (antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg, metoprolol (blood pressure medication) 25 mg, insulin Lispro Junior kwikpen, polymyxin B-trimethoprim (antibiotic eye drop) 10000-0.1 u/ml, acetaminophen (pain reliever) 325 mg, glucagon (medication to raise blood sugar) emergency injection 1mg, glucose oral gel 40% (medication to raise blood sugar), hydroxyzine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided services according to professional standards of care when a resident's wound care orders were transcribed incorrectly or not transcribed at all (Resident 5), a resident's prophylactic antibiotics were not reordered resulting in a delay in surgery (Resident K), when staff failed to administer medications at appropriate times recommended by the manufacturer (Resident 31 and 69), and when an antidepressant had an inaccurate diagnosis for use (Resident 94) for 5 of 78 residents reviewed for professional standards of care concerns. Findings include: 1. On 1/7/26 at 11:22 a.m. Resident 5's medical record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident whose diagnoses included, but were not limited to, a pressure ulcer to the sacral (tailbone) region. Resident 5 had a recently amputated fifth toe (pinky toe) on her left foot with sutures still intact. A progress note, dated 12/23/25, indicated during a dressing change a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) was noted below the suture site. Resident 5's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure non-pressure related wound dressings were changed appropriately and according to physician's orders for 1 of 1 residents (Resident K) reviewed for non-pressure related wound concerns.Findings include: On 1/8/26 at 12:48 p.m. Resident K's wound dressings were observed with the Director of Nursing (DON). Resident K had dressings just under their belly button and on their right outer ankle bone covering open blister wounds that were both dated 12/31/25. The dressing on their right outer ankle had visible bloody drainage on the outside of the dressing. Resident K also had dressings on his left elbow and left heel that had no date on them. On 1/9/26 at 1:16 p.m. Resident K's medical record was reviewed. He was a long-term care Resident whose diagnoses included but were not limited to non-pressure chronic ulcer of the right lower leg. Resident K had an active order to cleanse the wound on their left heel with normal saline, pat it dry and apply a foam dressing every Monday, Wednesday, Friday and every 8…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper wound care and positioning was done according to physician orders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for pressure ulcer concerns. Findings include:On 1/7/26 at 11:44 a.m. Resident 5's medical record was reviewed. She was a long-term care resident whose diagnoses included but were not limited to a pressure ulcer to the sacral (tailbone) region. Resident 5 had a recently amputated fifth toe (pinky toe) on her left foot with sutures still intact.A progress note, dated 12/23/25, indicated during a dressing change a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) was noted below the left lateral suture site.An IU Health Wound Clinic note dated 12/29/25 indicated Resident 5 had a wound to her lateral left foot (the outer edge of the left foot stretching from the heel to the little toe). The note indicated the wound care instructions for that wound were to cleanse the wound with wound cleaner, pat dry with a gauze, paint the eschar (dead, scabbed skin) with betadine (a widely used topical antiseptic that kills…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to remove a resident's supplements from his room and failed to ensure a resident's enabler bars were at a safe distance from her mattress for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 9 and 3).Findings include:1. On 1/5/25 at 10:13 a.m., Resident 9 was lying in his bed. He was unable to move his body. He used an eye gaze computer to communicate with others. On his table there was a large number of supplements. He indicated he took those supplements daily. The supplements included: IS [NAME], biocidin liquid, para 3, LB/GB Complex, Inflammatone, HM-ET Binder, ProbioMed 50, IS [NAME], primal multi, olive oil, vitamin D, Para 1, cyanocobalamin, menaquinone, argine (L argine), and magnesium.On 1/7/26 at 2:39 p.m., a record review was completed for Resident 9. He had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (a progressive neurodegenerative disease that attacks motor neurons in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident K) received their prescribed Oxycodone for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include: On 1/5/26 at 10:45 a.m. Resident K was observed as they sat in their recliner in their room. Resident K appeared to be very thin and frail but was in good spirits and able to have a conversation. Resident K spoke fondly of the dietary staff and indicated the floor staff were good for the most part but there were a few who he didn't care for. At the time of this observation Resident K did not elaborate on those staff members who he didn't care for. On 1/8/26 at 12:22 p.m. the Ombudsman indicated Resident K told her the facility had discontinued his pain medication and issued them a 30-day notice for discharge due to drug test results that the facility determined indicated Resident K had been abusing his opiate pain medication. On 1/8/26 at 12:48 p.m. Resident K was observed as they sat in their recliner in their room. The resident became tearful and indicated when we spoke…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance and ensure infection control practices were followed when a Qualified Medication Aid (QMA) passed medications to 5 residents (Residents E, R, S, T, and U), by touching medications and not properly sanitizing her hands. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 19 of 20 residents who resided on the 100, 200, and 300 hallways. Findings include:During a random medication observation on 9/30/25 at 9:28 a.m., QMA 9 was observed administering medications to Resident R. QMA 9 first performed a blood pressure check and used an ink pen to document the reading in the palm of her left hand. QMA 9 then popped medication tablets out of bubble packs into the palm of her left hand, placed them into a medication cup, and entered the resident's room to administer the medications. While preparing to place a transdermal patch onto Resident R's upper body, QMA 9 was observed to move both sleeves and the neck of Resident R's t-shirt while attempting to find a patch from the day before.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse by staff for 1 of 3 resident reviewed for abuse (Resident B). This deficient practice was corrected on 6/27/25, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: On 6/30/25 at 10:30 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident B. He had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (a progressive neurodegenerative disease that affects motor nerve cells the nerve cells that control voluntary muscle movement), dysphagia (difficulty speaking), and facial weakness. The facility self-reported incident, dated 6/23/25, indicated two Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) pulled on Resident B's arms during care while he shook his head no and expressed discomfort. Resident B indicated the CNA on his right side yanked his arm in bed to pull him to the ground, but the other CNA stopped her. On 6/30/25 at 10:45 a.m., Resident B was interviewed. Resident B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for meal service, toileting, bathing and dressing, and getting residents out of bed, received those services for 8 of 15 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance (Residents C, F, G, H, K, L, N, and S). Findings include: 1. Observations of Resident C included: a. On 4/27/25 at 9:50 a.m., Resident C was observed lying in bed with her eyes closed, the head of the bed was elevated, and the resident's upper torso was slumped to the right. There was paper debris on the floor around the bed. b. On 4/27/25 at 11:51 a.m., the resident remained in the same position with her eyes closed, the head of the bed was elevated, and the resident's upper torso slumped to the right. c. On 4/28/25 at 9:45 a.m., the resident was observed sitting in a manual wheelchair (WC) next to the bed, sitting on a blue transfer pad. The resident indicated she had not yet had breakfast. An untouched breakfast tray of food was observed sitting on top of a small black…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications and wound treatment solutions were secured in the public hallway and in the resident rooms for 5 of 5 residents reviewed for potential accidents (Residents G, S, T, Y, and BB). Findings include: 1. On 4/27/25 at 9:41 a.m., Resident G was observed lying in the bed awake, and a cup of unidentified pills sitting on an over the bed table beside the bed. The resident indicated he had no idea his medications were on the bedside stand as they were out of sight. Resident G's record was reviewed on 4/29/25 at 10:45 a.m. Diagnoses on Resident G's profile included, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, age related physical disability, overactive bladder, depression, and muscle weakness. The admission MDS and state optional assessments, completed on 2/27/25, assessed Resident G as having the ability to make himself understood and to understand others. He had no signs or symptoms of delirium, behavior, or rejection of care. A BIMS score 15/15 indicated the resident was cognitively intact.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly clean and store nebulizer (small machine that turns liquid medication into a mist that can be easily inhaled) and oxygen equipment for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Residents S, V, X, and Z). Findings include: 1. On 4/27/25 at 11:15 a.m., Resident S was observed sitting in a manual wheelchair (WC) at the bedside. The resident had a nasal cannula for oxygen in her nose attached to a bedside concentrator and gestured to her oxygen tubing which she took out of her brief, and indicated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 15 had put the oxygen tubing inside her brief and the resident had untaped her brief to get the tubing out. The resident gestured to her nebulizer sitting on the bed beside her and the nebulizer handheld mouthpiece was unbagged and lying in the middle of the bed among her bedding. A portable oxygen concentrator was observed on a bedside table on the back side of the bed, in the on position, and the attached nasal cannula was laying on the floor. The resident indicated she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate staffing levels to ensure residents received activities of daily living (ADL) care for meal service, toileting, bathing and dressing, medication administration, and getting residents out of bed for 14 of 16 residents reviewed for sufficient nurse staffing (Residents C, F, G, H, J, K, L, N, S, T, V, X, Y, and BB) and for 5 of 7 hallways (200, 400, 500, 700, and 800) observed for sufficient nurse staffing. Findings include: On 4/27/25 at 9:13 a.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5 indicated she was assigned to care for 7 residents on the 100 and 200 hallways by herself. There was no CNA in the facility to care for residents on the 300 and 400 hallways, but she was not sure why. The nursing scheduler QMA 4 had been called in to cover for a nurse call-off on the 400 hallways, but CNA 5 had yet to hear the backup plan to cover the CNA's hours. On 4/27/25 at 9:27 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 7 was observed administering medications on the 300 hallway. He indicated he usually worked double shifts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure specialized dementia care programming was implemented to provide meaningful, engaging and diverse activities and/or opportunities for residents with a diagnosis of dementia for 5 of 15 residents who resided in the specialized secured memory care (MC) unit, (Residents 21, 37, 38, 50 and 63). Findings include: Activities, events, and opportunities for MC unit residents were observed throughout the survey week. Those observations were reconciled with the posted Activity Calendar and special events hosted by the facility that week. While all residents were periodically observed, special focus was directed to Residents 21, 37, 38, 50 and 63. Observations and interviews below are organized by days 1-5, with morning, afternoon, or evening activities specified, as well as two special events hosted by the facility. Day 1, 10/21/24 scheduled activities for MC unit: 9:30 a.m., Morning Social 10:00 a.m., Coffee & Snax 10:30 a.m. Current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-28 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) role was filled for 6 of 12 months reviewed, and all new residents were screened to control infections for tuberculosis (TB) for 5 of 7 newly admitted residents reviewed for implementation of TB screenings (Resident 133, 134, 135, 136, and 184) and one previously admitted resident who did not receive TB screenings for 1 of 3 previously admitted residents (Resident 72). Findings include: 1 During the entrance conference, on 10/21/24, the Executive Director (ED) indicated the Infection Preventionist (IP) was their Regional Director of Operations (RDO). During an interview, on 10/28/24 at 11:08 a.m., the RDO indicated, although he had his IP certification from the CDC, he was not the IP for this facility but their RDO. He assisted with their survey readiness. He indicated he had asked all leadership members, including the Director of Nursing (DON) to get their IP certifications. He indicated this facility did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to code a pressure ulcer correctly on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 72) and failed to code Preadmission Assessment and Resident Review (PASARR) correctly on the MDS for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 14). Findings include: 1. On 10/24/24 at 11:39 a.m., a record review was completed for Resident 72. He had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to paraplegia, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 3 (a full-thickness wound that extends through the skin and into the subcutaneous fat, but not into the muscle, tendon, or bone), essential hypertension (HTN), and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Resident 72 had a wound care assessment dated [DATE]. It indicated he had three pressure ulcers. A stage 3 to his sacrum, a stage 3 to his left medial (middle) knee and a stage 3 to his right medial knee. His MDS, dated [DATE], indicated he had two stage 3 pressure ulcers and one unstageable (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive resident centered care plan was implemented for two residents related to their indwelling urinary catheters for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Residents 68 and 1). Findings include: 1. On 10/21/2024 at 10:39 a.m. Resident 68 was observed. He was propped up on his left side in his bed. There was a sign on his door which indicated he was in enhanced barrier precautions. A urinary collection bag was hung on the side of the bed. On 10/23/2024 at 12:32 p.m., Resident 68's medical record was reviewed. He was a long term care resident who's diagnoses included but were not limited to, retention of urine and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (a condition where the muscles and nerves of the bladder do not work together properly). He had a current physician's order for placement and securement of a urinary foley catheter. Resident 68's comprehensive care plans were reviewed and lacked documentation of a plan of care to address his need for a catheter. 2. On 10/21/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to coordinate treatments and services with hospice after new skin impairment areas were discovered on the bilateral lower extremities (BLE) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for change of condition (Resident B). Findings include: On 10/22/2024 at 9:50 a.m., Resident B was observed as she laid in bed. Here eyes were closed and she was positioned on her back. On 10/22/2024 at 10:12 a.m., Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 23 and an unidentified CNA were observed as they changed Resident B's brief. During her care, Resident B's BLE were observed to be reddened and edematous which extended from below her knees to the top of her ankles. Both CNAs indicated Resident B was totally depended on staff for all care. On 10/22/2024 at 10:23 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 120 indicated she changed Resident Bs' dressings in the morning and any time the dressing was soiled or loose. RN indicated that the resident had stopped eating, and that the hospice nurse came in more frequently to check on the resident and to do wound care since the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all tube feedings were completed according to physician's orders for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for tube feeding (Resident 74 and 134). Findings include: 1. On 10/25/24 at 12:28 p.m., Resident 134's record was reviewed. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to the after-effects of cerebral infarction (stroke) including hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis) on her right dominant side, gastrostomy (g-tube for consuming nutrition), and diabetes mellitus (blood sugar disorder). A progress note, dated 10/17/24 at 9:28 p.m., indicated Resident 134 arrived at the facility after suffering an acute cerebral vascular accident (CVA, stroke). She was to have nothing by mouth (NPO) and had a gastric tube (g-tube). Her sister indicated all medications and Glucerna were provided via her g-tube. Her admission weight was 243 pounds. On 10/23/24, her weight was 235.4. She lost 7.6 pounds in 6 days. Her physician's orders, dated 10/18/24, included but were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident, (Resident 82) who was newly admitted from the hospital, received appropriate and timely interventions to assess and treat her pain, which resulted in her choice to discharge from the facility against medical advice (AMA) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain. Findings include: On 10/25/24 at 12:40 p.m., a closed record review was completed for Resident 82. She had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis (MS, a chronic disease that damages the central nervous system and often causes pain), and pain in right arm due to compartment syndrome, (a serious condition that occurs when pressure increases in a muscle compartment, which can restrict blood flow and cause pain). A nursing progress note, dated 8/10/24 at 12:50 p.m., indicated Resident 82 admitted to the facility, from a local hospital and she was alert and oriented to person, place, time and situation. On 8/10/24 at 2:49 p.m., a pain assessment was completed. It indicated her pain intensity in the past 24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an alternative or additional emergency pharmaceutical services were available to obtain an authorization code for a resident, (Resident 82) when she began to experience pain and needed medication from the emergency medication kit (EDK) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. Findings include: On 10/25/24 at 12:40 p.m., a closed record review was completed for Resident 82. She had the following diagnoses which included but were not limited to, multiple sclerosis (MS, a chronic disease that damages the central nervous system and often causes pain), and pain in right arm due to compartment syndrome, (a serious condition that occurs when pressure increases in a muscle compartment, which can restrict blood flow and cause pain). Resident 82 was admitted to the facility from a local hospital on 8/10/24 at 12:50 p.m. A physician's order for a narcotic pain medication had been entered into the medical record at 3:19 p.m., but by 10:47 p.m., more than 7 hours later that night, she still had not received pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided lunches according to policy for enhanced barrier precaution residents (Resident 17 and 77). Findings include: 1. On 10/21/24 at 12:38 p.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 6 was observed removing Resident 77's lunch from the lunch cart. She did not perform hand hygiene before entering or after leaving her room. Resident 77 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) due to g-tube (for long-term nutrition) and pressure ulcer (skin injury caused by prolonged pressure on an area of the body). On 10/21/24 at 12:39 p.m., QMA 6 was observed removing Resident 17's lunch from the lunch cart. She did not perform hand hygiene before entering or after leaving her room. Resident 17 was on EBP due to her indwelling catheter and wound. On 10/21/24 at 12:45 p.m., QMA 6 was observed entering Resident 17's room with an additional lunch item. She did not complete hand hygiene before entering or upon exiting her room. On 10/21/24 at 1:53 p.m., Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 8 indicated when staff members…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' narcotic medications were protected from diversion resulting in at least 56 missing narcotic medication tablets, from 4 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 1 automated drug unit (ADU - an electronic drug dispensary machine) reviewed for misappropriation of medications (Residents C and D). The deficient practice was corrected on 2/16/24, prior to the start of the survey, and was therefore past noncompliance. Finding includes: An Indiana State Department of Health Survey Report System report, dated 2/1/24, indicated the Director of Nursing (DON) observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 14 had pulled multiple controlled substance medications from an [NAME], the controlled substances pulled did not reflect the medications that were documented as having been administered. 1. On 5/23/24 at 10:56 a.m., Resident C was observed sitting in a wheelchair (wc) in her room. She was alert and talkative, but there were signs of confusion as she talked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-15 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure mandatory staffing information for the payroll-based journal (PBJ) was submitted by the required deadline for 1 of 1 quarters reviewed for PBJ submission. Findings include: The facilities Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports, (CASPER) was reviewed. The report indicated 1-star staffing had been triggered for the 2nd quarter of 2023. During an interview on 9/12/23 at 11:43 a.m., the Regional Director of Operations (RDO) indicated, PBJ data was submitted out of the company's home office in Florida. Unfortunately, an administrative error had been made when the individual home-office staff responsible for the data submission missed the deadline by one day. The company filed an appeal which was denied by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed on ensure narcotic and non-narcotic drugs were received, administered, and accounted for with facility Controlled Substance Accountability Sheets and Medication Disposition Sheets according to policy to prevent possible drug diversion for 6 of 6 residents who passed away in the facility (Resident 66, 68, 119, 121, 122, and 123). Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 3:36 p.m., Resident 119's record was reviewed. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and expired in the facility on [DATE] at 5:55 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (bone marrow disorder) and diabetes mellitus (DM) (blood sugar disorder). Her physician ordered medication included, but were not limited to, lorazepam (anti-anxiety) liquid 2 mg/mL give 0.5 mL by mouth every 2 hours as needed for anxiety, and morphine sulfate (severe pain relief) 20 mg/mL give 0.25 mL by mouth every one hour as needed for pain related to AML. A pain care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with non-pressure wounds received treatments upon her admission to the facility for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds (Resident 52). Findings include: On 9/11/23 at 10:24 a.m., Resident 52 was observed as she was assisted out of bed and into her recliner chair. She wore an oversized nightgown and as she repositioned herself in the bed, the back of her thighs were observed. The skin was discolored, darker in color than the surrounding healthy tissue and closer to the edge of her brief, was redder in color. During an interview on 9/11/23 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 52 indicated she had previously lived in an assisted living facility, until she developed wounds on her bottom, in her groin area and under the skin fold of her stomach. She went to the hospital, and they got a lot better but she had spent so much time in the bed, her legs were weak. She was transferred to the nursing home for rehab to regain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement interventions added post fall for a resident (Resident 57) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for falls, and failed to complete a smoking assessment after a resident had a significant change (Resident 40) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for smoking. Findings include: 1. On 9/13/23 at 1:30 p.m., a comprehensive record review was completed for Resident 57. He had diagnoses that included but were not limited to COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, essential hypertension, age related physical disability, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Resident 57 had a fall on 8/2/23 at 5:00 a.m. He was calling out that he had to use the bathroom. When staff entered the room, they found him lying on the floor with his back next to the bed. He had bruising to this chest and top of right hand, along with abrasions to his left and right buttock and right upper extremity (arm). On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to destroy expired and outdated tuberculin serum and single dose influenza vaccinations for 1 of 3 medication rooms observed. Findings include: On [DATE] at 1:16 p.m., the rehab medication room refrigerator was observed with the IDON (Interim Director of Nursing). There were 4 boxes of individual influenza serum that had an expiration date on the boxes for [DATE]. There were 2 bottles of tuberculin serum that were opened but lacked a date to indicate when the bottles were opened. On [DATE] at 1:32 p.m., the IDON removed the tuberculin serum and influenza serum from the refrigerator and indicated they should be dated and removed when expired. On [DATE] at 11:37a.m., the IDON provided a copy of the information insert of the tuberculin serum. The serum was named Aplisol. It indicated, Vials in use more than 30 days should be discarded due to possible oxidation and degradation may effect potency. 3.1-25(j) 3.1-25(m) 3.1-25(n)

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the glucometer was cleaned prior to resident use, before being placed in a staff member's pocket, cleaned appropriately before being put away, and before it being used on the next resident for 2 of 2 residents observed for glucometer use (Resident 32 and 29). Finding include: On 9/13/23 at 7:38 a.m., Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 14 was observed taking the glucometer out of the 400 hall medication cart (med cart). She did not clean it before taking Resident 32's blood sugar (BS). Afterward, she dropped it into the right pocket of her scrub shirt. Back at the medication cart, she did not clean it and laid it on top of the medication cart. On 9/13/23 at 7:40 a.m., QMA 14 was observed putting it into the top drawer of the medication cart without further cleaning. On 9/13/23 at 3:23 p.m., Resident 32's record was reviewed. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes mellitus (DM) (blood sugar disorder) and dementia (progressive brain disorder). A physician's order indicated to complete…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$31,540 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $31,540 — penalty dated 2026-01-13
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-02-17 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GIBRALTAR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 03/01/2024
SCOOPER REALTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 03/01/2024
WINDSOR SQUARE REALTY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/01/2024
ENGELS, ERINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2014
GENTRY, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
STARKEY, TYLERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2020
WAITE, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2020
WHICKER, TIMOTHYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/12/2022
FENOUGHTY, DEANNAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/10/2023
BROWNSBURG CARE CENTER, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
FORVIS MAZARS, LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2023
OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2024
PEASE BELL CPAS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/14/2018
SIGLER, MELANIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/11/2024
GURWITZ, SOLOMONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/18/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
LTC CONSULTING SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
OPCO IN SKILLED MGMT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024
PIKE, JAMESIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 68%Medicare 6%Other / private 26%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$364per resident / day
operating cost
$11,064per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$288per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155206. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next