McGivney Health Care Center
2907 East Smoky Row, Carmel, IN 46033 · Non profit - Corporation · 37 certified beds · (317) 846-0265 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (20% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,189 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-22)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 27.5% | 11.0% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.2% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.9% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.6% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.5% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.5% | 23.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.1% | 3.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.5% | 23.3% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 33.3% | 13.6% | 17.1% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 66% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 37 beds and averages 34.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.91 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.13 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.90 on weekdays — about the same on weekends as weekdays. RN hours go from 0.03 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 20% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-09-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct medication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a significant medication error. (Resident 20) Resident 20 required an intensive care stay in the hospital for 5 days. Finding includes: The record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 9/19/23 at 2:01 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, bradycardia, abnormal weight loss, mood disorder, chronic pain syndrome, and hypertension. A progress note, dated 6/30/23 at 9:25 am, indicated the resident was noted to be lethargic. The skin was cool to touch, he had increased slurring speech, and his speech was garbled. The provider was notified and requested a transfer to the emergency department. An SBAR (situation, background, assessment, and recommendation form), dated 6/30/23 at 9:36 a.m., indicated the resident had a change in mental status and was given another resident's medications. A hospital patient summary report, dated 6/30/23 at 2:46 pm, indicated the admitting diagnosis was an overdose of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for advanced directive was accurate for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident 30)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 30 was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:44 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, bipolar disorder severe depressed without psychotic features, mood affective disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, alcohol abuse with intoxication, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.A physician's order, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 30 was a full code.A physician's order for scope of treatment (POST) form, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 30 did not want to be resuscitated with cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR).A consent/declination to resuscitate form, signed [DATE], indicated Resident 30 did not want to be resuscitated if he had no pulse and was not breathing.A care plan, initiated [DATE] and dated as late reviewed [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications which were ordered as needed (prn) had a 14 day stop date and baseline Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessments were completed for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 6 and 30)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 8/20/25 at 11:23 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, intracranial injury with loss of consciousness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting the left non-dominant side, dementia, traumatic brain injury, delusional disorders, and alcohol abuse. A physician's order, dated 2/14/25, indicated to give Xanax (an antianxiety medication) 0.25 milligrams (mg) every 8 hours as needed for anxiety. The order, dated 2/14/25, did not have a stop date. The physician's order for Xanax 0.25 mg every 8 hours as needed was not discontinued until 5/23/25. The as needed physician's order was current for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident and the resident's representative was provided the written transfer and bed hold notices for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 5)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 5 was reviewed on 8/20/25 at 10:46 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, disorder of the brain, type 2 diabetes mellitus, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, asthma, congestive heart failure, dementia, pseudobulbar affect (PBA), acute necrotizing hemorrhagic encephalopathy, and localized edema. A transfer to the hospital summary, dated 6/3/25 at 7:54 p.m., indicated the resident complained of shortness of breath and difficulty breathing. Despite interventions, the resident's oxygen saturation continued to decrease to 81%. The resident was transported to the hospital by ambulance, and the resident's mother was notified. During an interview, on 8/21/25 at 10:15 a.m., LPN 3 indicated that when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was updated when new diagnoses and antipsychotic medications were added for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 30 and 3)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 30 was reviewed on 8/19/25 at 2:44 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia with other behavioral disturbance, bipolar disorder current episode severe depressed without psychotic features, mood affective disorder, intermittent explosive disorder, alcohol abuse with intoxication, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation. A PASARR level II, dated 11/7/24, indicated Resident 30 had diagnoses of intermittent explosive disorder, intellectual disability, mood disorder, and schizophrenia. A psychosocial note, dated 4/23/25 at 11:28 a.m., indicated Resident 30 had diagnoses of dementia and bipolar. A PASARR level II, dated 11/7/24, did not include the diagnoses of dementia and bipolar. During an interview, on 8/21/25 at 11:35 a.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed to address the resident's medical needs for 2 of 14 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. (Resident 12 and 22) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 8/19/25 at 10:53 a.m., Resident 12 had a urinary catheter and was receiving oxygen therapy.The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 8/20/25 at 10:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, benign prostatic hyperplasia (prostate gland enlargement causing difficulty urinating) with lower urinary tract symptoms, prediabetes, age related physical debility, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic respiratory failure.A physician's order, dated 8/6/25, indicated flush the urinary catheter daily with 40 milliliters (ml) of fluid.A physician's order, dated 8/14/25, indicated to check oxygen saturation every shift, and titrate the oxygen to 4L to maintain an oxygen saturation above 90%.A care plan for the use of a urinary catheter and oxygen therapy was not located in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and updated after Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed for 2 of 14 residents reviewed for care planning. (Resident 4 and 6)Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 4 was reviewed on 8/20/25 at 1:58 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy, schizophrenia, repeated falls, alcohol dependence, and congestive heart failure. A fall note, dated 1/26/25 at 11:30 a.m., indicated the resident was found on the floor with a swollen raised bump on his forehead. An incident note, dated 4/6/2025 at 11:30 a.m., indicated the resident was found walking on his knees. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed for Resident 4 on 6/2/25. A care plan, initiated on 7/28/24 and dated as last reviewed on 7/22/25, did not include Resident 4's falls on 1/26/25 or 4/6/25. A care plan, initiated on 3/20/24 and dated as last reviewed on 7/22/25, indicated Resident 4 was a high risk for falls related to gait and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were obtained according to the physician's order and to assess and treat a resident for constipation for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 31 and 22)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident 31 was reviewed on 8/20/25 at 12:37 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes, edema, and acute kidney failure.A physician's order, dated 7/18/25, indicated to weigh the resident daily related to edema.The Medication Administration Record (MAR) had the following:a. On 7/18/25, no weight was recorded.b. On 7/20/25, no weight was recorded.c. On 8/1/25, no weight was recorded.d. On 8/2/25, no weight was recorded.e. On 8/6/25, no weight was recorded.During an interview, on 8/21/25 at 9:40 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 indicated he could not locate a daily weight for those days.During an interview, on 8/21/25 at 9:43 a.m., Qualified Medication Assistant (QMA) 5 indicated he could not locate those weights in the paper charting. The weights should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were aware of who was responsible to complete catheter care and to document catheter care was provided for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 12)Findings include: During an observation, on 8/19/25 at 10:53 a.m., Resident 12 had a urinary catheter.The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 8/20/25 at 10:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, benign prostatic hyperplasia (prostate gland enlargement causing difficulty urinating) with lower urinary tract symptoms, prediabetes, and age-related physical debility.A physician's order, dated 8/6/25, indicated flush the urinary catheter daily with 40 milliliters (ml) of fluid.A physician's order to complete urinary catheter care on a routine basis was not located in the medical record.Cather care documentation was not located in the medical record.During an interview, on 8/20/25 at 3:03 p.m., Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 6 indicated the nurses completed the cleaning of the urinary catheters.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were obtained for changing and dating oxygen tubing and to ensure humidified water was changed and dated for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory therapy. (Resident 1 and 12)Findings include:During an observation, on 8/19/25 at 10:45 a.m., Resident 1 was observed with a portable oxygen tank set to 2 liters per minute. The oxygen line did not have a date to show when it had last been changed. During an observation, on 8/20/25 at 11:38 a.m., LPN 4 indicated the oxygen line was supposed to be dated and it was not. During an observation, on 8/21/25 at 11:39 a.m., Resident 1's oxygen line did not have a date to show when it was last changed. During an observation, on 8/22/25 at 8:33 a.m., Resident 1's oxygen line did not have a date to show when it was last changed. The clinical record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 8/21/25 at 10:57 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, hypertension, and a history of pneumonia. A physician's order indicated to check Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for eight (8) consecutive hours, seven (7) days a week for 1 of 14 days reviewed for RN coverage. (8/22/25)Findings include:During an observation, on 8/22/25 between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., the facility did not have a Registered Nurse on duty.The staffing records, from 8/16/25 through 8/26/25, listed two RNs as currently employed with the facility: the Director of Nursing and the Infection Preventionist. The facility staffing records did not indicate a RN was on duty 8/22/25.The facility was unable to provide documentation to show that an RN had been on duty for the night, day, or evening shift on 8/22/25.During an interview, on 8/26/25 at 9:47 a.m., the Executive Director indicated the facility followed the state regulations.A current facility policy, titled Nursing Staffing Hours, dated 2020 and received from the Executive Director on 8/26/25 at 9:35 a.m., indicated .The requirements for long-term care facilities require a skilled nursing facility provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure spoiled food was discarded in 1 of 2 dry food storage areas reviewed for food storage. (the basement food storage area)Findings include:During an observation, on 8/19/25 at 11:12 a.m., bananas, with a received date of 8/6/25, were brown and black with a white growth substance on the stem. The bananas had spots which were oozing liquid and some bubbles forming.During an interview, on 8/21/25 at 11:40 a.m., the kitchen manager indicated the bananas needed to be thrown away as they were spoiled.A current facility policy, titled Expired Food, dated as last revised on 3/2/21 and received from the Activity Director on 8/22/25 at 11:30 a.m., indicated .DISPOSING OF SPOILED FOOD OR POSSIBLY CONTAMINATED: Place the food, i.e. expired, swollen metal cans or suspected glass jar in a heavy opaque or black garbage bag 3.1-21(i)(3)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were in place and followed for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. (Resident 12 and 31)Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 8/19/25 at 10:53 a.m., Resident 12 had a urinary catheter.The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 8/20/25 at 10:31 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, benign prostatic hyperplasia (prostate gland enlargement causing difficulty urinating) with lower urinary tract symptoms, prediabetes, and age-related physical debility.A physician's order, dated 8/6/25, indicated flush the urinary catheter daily with 40 milliliters (ml) of fluid.A physician's order for enhanced barrier precautions was not located in the medical record.There were no signs related to enhanced barrier precautions in the room or on Resident 12's door.During an observation, on 8/21/25 at 1:23 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 completed catheter care for Resident 12. A gown was not worn during the procedure.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in 1 of 18 rooms. (room [ROOM NUMBER])Findings include:During an observation, on 8/19/25 at 3:04 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was found to have two beds, two nightstands, two clothing wardrobes, and one dresser. Two residents were occupying the room.During an interview, on 8/19/25 at 3:04 p.m., Resident 21 indicated he liked his room and had no concerns with the size.During an interview, on 8/19/25 at 3:07 p.m., Resident 23 indicated he liked this room and had no concerns with the size of the room.During an interview, on 8/25/25 at 11:05 a.m., the Executive Director indicated there had been no physical changes to the room which had a previous room waiver since the last survey.A bed inventory form, dated 8/25/25, indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] contained two beds.A review of the facility measurements for room [ROOM NUMBER] indicated the bedroom did not provide 80 square feet per resident. room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan which addressed constipation, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, and pain for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan which addressed constipation, insomnia, hyperlipidemia, and pain for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. (Resident 11 and 26) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 9/25/24 at 10:59 a.m., Resident 11 indicated he was often constipated. The clinical record for Resident 11 was reviewed on 9/27/24 at 11:01 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, muscle weakness, abnormal weight loss, and chronic idiopathic constipation. A physician's order, initiated on 2/20/23, indicated to give Linzess Oral Capsule (a medication for constipation) 145 micrograms (mcg) once a day related to chronic idiopathic constipation. A physician's order, initiated on 3/2/22, indicated to give Miralax Powder (a medication for constipation) 17 grams/scoop in the morning for constipation.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory results for the monitoring and effectiveness of a cholesterol medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 26) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 26 was reviewed on 9/26/24 at 2:25 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pain in an unspecified joint, insomnia, and mixed hyperlipidemia. A physician's order, initiated on 8/27/21, indicated to give Lipitor (a medication for high cholesterol) 10 milligrams daily at bedtime for mixed hyperlipidemia. A laboratory result, dated 2/11/22, indicated the resident had a high triglyceride level of 188. There were no other laboratory results in the record to indicate a lipid profile (a blood test to monitor the lipid levels in the blood) had been monitored after 2/11/22. There were no entries in the record to indicate laboratory orders had been received and/or were pending. During an interview, on 10/2/24 at 10:07 a.m., the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse indicated the facility did not have a policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and document a resident's delusions related to the use of an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 28) Finding includes: The clinical record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 10/1/24 at 9:21 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, psychotic disorder with delusions, alcohol abuse, and hyperlipidemia. A physician's order, with a start date of 4/5/24, indicated to give Zyprexa (an antipsychotic medication) 7.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth at bedtime for a psychotic disorder with delusions. A care plan, with a revision date of 1/28/21, indicated the resident displayed at times delusions he believed he was incarcerated and he planned to discharge. A care plan, with a revision date of 4/12/24, indicated the resident used the psychotropic medication Zyprexa related to psychosis with delusions. During an interview, on 10/1/24 at 9:58 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated Resident 28 did have delusions. Behaviors should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was properly stored in a kitchen refrigerator for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety. (the refrigerator) Finding includes: During an observation, on 9/27/24 at 11:02 a.m., there was thawing meat stored above a gallon of milk, next to yogurt and a grocery sack of green bell peppers which belonged to a resident and were unlabeled in a kitchen refrigerator. During an interview, on 9/27/24 at 11:09 a.m., the Kitchen Manager indicated the milk should be stored on the top rack and not under the thawing meat. They should not store residents' food in the kitchen refrigerator. They have a refrigerator for storing residents' food downstairs in storage. A current policy, titled McGivney Health Care Center Food and Nutrition Policy, dated as last revised 3/1/17 and received from the Executive Director on 10/2/24 at 10:30 a.m., indicated .Uncooked and raw animal products and fish will be stored separately in drip-proof containers and below fruits, vegetables and other ready-to-eat foods .All foods belonging to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet per resident in 1 of 18 rooms reviewed for living space. (room [ROOM NUMBER]) Finding includes: During the entrance conference, on 9/25/24 at 10:12 a.m., the Director of Nursing indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] continued to have a room size waiver. During an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] with Maintenance Staff 4, on 9/25/24 at 9:44 a.m., the room was found to contain two beds and two free standing wardrobes which were used for clothing and storage of personal items belonging to the two occupants of the room. A review of the facility measurement indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] was 153.83 square feet and according to Life Safety code the double occupancy of the room allowed 76.9 square feet of living space per resident. During an interview, on 9/30/24 at 2:34 p.m., Resident 29 indicated he liked his room and felt he had enough space for himself and his roommate. During an interview, on 9/30/24 at 2:49 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-09-22 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered bedtime snacks each evening. There was a 15-hour time lapse between the supper meal and breakfast. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 35 of 35 residents who resided in the facility. Finding includes: A dining schedule, provided at entrance, indicated the facility supper time was 5:00 p.m., and breakfast was at 8:00 a.m., which was a 15-hour time lapse between these meals. During an interview, on 9/20/23 at 11:00 a.m., CNA 10 indicated the cook on the evening shift would gather a cart of snacks including peanut butter and jelly sandwiches and crackers. The facility staff did not pass out the snacks although they were available for any resident who wanted them. Usually, the residents who wandered and were up all night would get the snacks. During an interview, on 9/20/23 at 11:41 a.m., Resident 6 indicated she did not get a snack at night and the facility staff did not ask her if she wanted a snack. When she did ask for a snack, the staff would tell her they did not have any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thaw out meat safely and have the sanitizing solution (used to disinfect tables and counters) bucket levels at the recommended range to kill bacteria. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 35 of 35 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include: During the kitchen observation, on 9/17/23 at 11:00 a.m., with the Dietary Staff 19 the following were observed: a. The sink contained 2 large plastic bags of frozen chicken. The sink had no cold water in the sink and the chicken was thawing at room temp. b. The red sanitizer bucket was tested three times. Dietary Staff 19 placed a test strip into the bucket and the testing strip did not change colors. She tested the bucket again using a strip from a different container and the testing strip did not change color. She then took a third container, and the testing strip did not change colors. The containers for all three sanitizing solution testing strips indicated the ranges for the solution were numbered 10, 25, 50, 100 and 200 and should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Executive Director (ED) failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) was completing the infection surveillance and antibiotic stewardship for the infection control program, to ensure the facility had policies for infection surveillance and antibiotic stewardship, to ensure policies were reviewed annually, to ensure QAPI (quality assurance and performance improvement) meetings had documentation of items reviewed during the meetings, to ensure the facility was staffed according to the needs listed in the facility assessment and to ensure the facility environment was clean and in good repair. Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 9/19/23 at 11:12 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she did not have an infection control binder. There was no infection surveillance or map of the type of infections at the facility or documentation if there were any trends of infections. She indicated she was not familiar with any type of criteria for the appropriate use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document an annual review of the infection control policies, to ensure multiple use glucometers were clean and to ensure soiled clothing was not thrown on the floor for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for incontinence care (Resident 6). Findings include: 1. A current policy, titled COVID-19 Vaccination Requirements, received from the Executive Director (ED) at entrance did not have an effective date or a date reviewed. A current policy, titled Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations, received from the ED at entrance had an effective date of 2016 and no revision or date reviewed. During an interview, on 9/19/23 at 12:21 p.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated the facility did not date their policies to show they had reviewed them annually. 2. During a medication storage observation, on 9/18/23 at 3:00 p.m., the long hall medication storage cart was observed to have the following: a. There was one glucometer sitting on top of the sticky top drawer and it was not in any type of wrapping or container. 3. During a medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish policies and a program for antibiotic stewardship, to monitor the use of antibiotics including the use of standardized tools for the appropriateness of antibiotics prescribed and to have a system of surveillance for residents with repeated urinary tract infections (UTIs) for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for UTIs. (Resident 186 and 32) Finding includes: 1. During the entrance conference, the facility failed to provide a policy on antibiotic stewardship and infection surveillance. The Infection Control binder provided by the facility at entrance was dated 2022 and June 2022 was the last entry in the binder. The facility had monthly logs printed by the pharmacy which included the resident name, type of infection, signs and symptoms, and antibiotic utilized. The log did not include if the infection and signs and symptoms met the standardized criteria for the use of the antibiotic. The log did not include if the antibiotic was appropriate for the culture and sensitivity reports for UTIs. During an interview, on 9/19/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-22 · tag F0882 — patternDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) was knowledgeable, had completed the facility infection surveillance and antibiotic stewardship documentation, and was not also the acting Director of Nursing (DON) for 1 of 1 Infection Preventionist reviewed. (The DON) Finding includes: During the entrance conference, the Executive Director (ED) provided an IP certificate for the DON which was completed on 6/14/23. During an interview, on 9/18/23 at 4:20 p.m., the ED indicated there was no job description for the IP nurse. The DON job description included the duties of the IP. During an interview, on 9/19/23 at 11:12 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she did not have an infection control binder and only had an antibiotic log which was printed out by the pharmacy monthly. She did not have any type of monitoring for infections other than the monthly log printed from the pharmacy. There was no surveillance or map of the type of infections at the facility or documentation if there were any trends of infections. She indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of a weekly weight gain and a blood sugar outside the call parameters for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for notification of change. (Resident 1 and 12) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 9/21/23 at 11:34 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes myelitis, dementia, and hypertension. A care plan, revised 2/9/17, indicated the resident was on a diuretic (furosemide) due to hypertension. The interventions included, but were not limited to, weekly weight and notify the physician per protocol. A physician's order, dated 10/1/20, indicated to weigh the resident weekly and if there was a greater than 3-pound weight gain notify the physician. A facility vital sign documentation indicated the following weights: a. The weight, on 8/25/22, was 209 pounds (lbs.). b. The weight, on 9/1/22, was 216 lbs. The resident had a 7 lb. weight gain in one week. There was no documentation to indicate the physician was notified of the 7-pound weight gain. During an interview, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a significant medication error which resulted in a resident requiring an intensive care stay of 5 days in the hospital was reported to the State Agency for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for reporting. (Resident 20) Finding includes: The record for Resident 20 was reviewed on 09/19/23 at 2:01 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with other behavioral disturbance, bradycardia, abnormal weight loss, mood disorder, chronic pain syndrome, and hypertension. A progress note, dated 6/30/23 at 9:25 am, indicated the resident was noted to be lethargic. The skin was cool to touch, he had increased slurring speech, and his speech was garbled. The provider was notified and requested a transfer to the emergency department. An SBAR (situation, background, assessment, and recommendation form), dated 6/30/23 at 9:36 a.m., indicated the resident had a change in mental status and was given another resident's medications. A hospital patient summary report, dated 6/30/23 at 2:46 pm, indicated the admitting diagnosis was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a new diagnosis of systolic heart failure was included in the MDS (Minimum Data Set) under medical diagnoses for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for assessments. (Resident 32) Finding includes: The record for Resident 32 was reviewed on 9/19/23 at 11:31 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, depressive episode, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, restlessness and agitation, pain in the right leg, and delusional disorders. A progress note, dated 4/4/23 at 12:09 p.m., indicated the resident had swollen arms, pitting edema to both ankles and abdomen. She had diminished lung sounds noted throughout the lobes. The provider was notified, and a new order was received to send the resident to the emergency department for evaluation and treatment. A hospital discharge summary note, dated 4/9/23 at 1:25 p.m., indicated a new diagnosis of acute systolic heart failure exacerbation. The echocardiogram indicated an ejection fraction (percentage of blood pumped out with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure another PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) level I was completed when the resident was prescribed an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 29) Finding includes: The record for Resident 29 was reviewed on 9/20/23 at 4:30 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusion. A PASARR level I, dated 9/4/20, indicated the resident had no mental health medication and no level II was required due to situational symptoms. The level I screen indicated a PASARR disability was not present because of the following reason: Low level behavioral health symptoms were present. However, those appear to be situational. If the individual's symptoms or behaviors did not improve or resolve within 30-60 days of this screen, then the nursing facility must submit an updated status change level I screen to reevaluate the need for a PASARR level II behavioral health evaluation. A physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a new seizure diagnosis had a care plan for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care plans. (Resident 22) Finding includes: The record for Resident 22 was reviewed on 9/19/23 at 12:19 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, epileptic seizures, and fracture of nasal bone. A physician's order, dated 7/14/23, indicated lacosamide (a seizure medication) 150 mg (milligrams) twice daily for seizures. A progress note, dated 7/14/23 at 12:12 a.m., indicated the resident was walking down the hall going to the shower. He was noted hitting the wall and banister while starting to seize. He had issues breathing and a seizure with full tonic-clonic movement. The seizure activity lasted 3 minutes. A hospital discharge note, dated 7/17/23, indicated the resident had a 3-minute grandmal seizure witnessed at the extended care facility. Facility staff indicated the resident had no previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and investigate a fall with a major injury for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 186) Finding includes: The record for Resident 186 was reviewed on 9/20/23 at 1:37 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, non-traumatic chronic subdural hemorrhage, generalized anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. A progress note, dated 7/22/23 at 3:13 p.m., indicated the resident was experiencing episodes of increased confusion, stumbling during ambulation, and did not feed himself during mealtimes. The resident was sent to the hospital. A hospital presenting symptoms details report, dated 7/22/23, indicated the resident had increased confusion. The resident was not eating on his own at the long-term care (LTC) facility as he usually did and had an unwitnessed fall. The emergency department work up showed the resident had an acute on chronic subdural hematoma (usually caused by a head…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident being treated for a urinary tract infection was provided timely incontenent care and was free from wearing two incontinent briefs, failed to obtain a culture and sensitivity after a urinalysis, and failed to prevent a recurrent urinary tract infection for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary tract infections. (Resident 6 and 32) Findings include: 1. During an interview, on 9/22/23 at 2:20 p.m., Resident 6 indicated she had been waiting two hours to have her wet brief changed and her buttock was hurting. The resident asked the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 13 at noon to be changed and was still waiting. During an observation, on 9/22/23 at 2:31 p.m., Qualified Medication Assistant (QMA) 11 and CNA 12 entered the resident's room to provide peri-care. QMA 11 indicated Resident 6 had a strong urine odor. QMA 11 opened the left side of the incontinent brief and tucked the end of the incontinence brief under the resident's left side. The resident was wearing two briefs. The staff turned the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was 24 hours of CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) coverage during the day and evening shift according to the facility assessment, failed to ensure staff were able to complete documentation on the Medication Administration Record (MAR), and failed to ensure a resident was provided timely incontinent care for 8 shifts and 2 of 2 residents reviewed for sufficient staffing. (5/28/23 day shift, 5/27/23 evening shift, 5/21/23 evening shift, 5/7/23 evening shift, 5/6/23 day and evening shift, and 4/30/23 day and evening shift, and Residents 28 and 6) Finding includes: 1. A payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report, for the third quarter of 2023, indicated the facility triggered for low weekend staffing. During an interview, on 9/19/23 at 2:53 p.m., the Executive Director (ED) indicated the facility assessment showed the need for 24 hours Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) coverage during the day and evening shifts. This would be a total of 3 CNAs for the day and evening shifts. If the facility was using agency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was in the facility for 8 hours each day during a 24-hour period for 27 days of the third quarter reviewed for sufficient staffing. (April 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, 29, and 30, May 6, 7, 13, 14, 20, 21, 27, 28, and 29, June 3, 4, 10, 11, 17, 18, 24 and 25, 2023). Finding includes: A Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report, for the third quarter of 2023, indicated the facility did not have RN coverage for April 1, April 2, April 7, April 8, April 9, April 15, April 16, April 22, April 29, April 30, May 6, May 7, May 13, May 14, May 20, May 21, May 27, May 28, May 29, June 3, June 4, June 10, June 11, June 17, June 18, June 24 and June 25, 2023. The facility assessment, received at entrance and updated on 6/6/2023, indicated the facility was to have 8 hours of RN coverage each day. During an interview, on 9/19/23 at 11:03 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she started working as the DON at the end of February. She was the only RN who worked at the facility. She was at the facility 4 days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure performance reviews were completed for nurse aides at least every 12 months for 5 of 5 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) reviewed for employee records. (CNA 14, CNA 15, CNA 16, CNA 17, and CNA 10) Finding includes: During a record review, on 9/18/23 at 1:55 p.m., the employee records indicated there were several missing in-services. During an interview, on 9/20/23 at 2:53 p.m., the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated she had not done any performance reviews for CNAs and could not provide any. A current position description, titled Director of Nursing, created on March 2019 and received from the Executive Director (ED) indicated .Evaluates the work performance of all nursing personnel During an interview, on 9/21/23 at 2:33 p.m., the ED indicated he had no policy for providing staffing performance reviews. 3.1-14(h)(1) 3.1-14(h)(2) 3.1-14(h)(3)
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post nurse staffing information in an area which could be clearly seen for 35 of 35 residents and visitors reviewed for nurse staffing. Finding includes: During an observation, on 9/19/23 at 11:10 a.m., there was no posted nurse staffing sheet around the nurse's station or noted in the facility. During an interview, on 9/19/23 at 11:15 a.m., the Activities Director indicated the facility did not post nurse staffing data but kept it in a binder. During an observation, on 9/19/23 at 11:20 a.m., the daily staffing sheet was in a binder behind the nurse's station. The daily staffing sheet was not posted in an area easily visible for residents and visitors. During an interview, on 9/21/23 at 2:33 p.m., the ED (Executive Director) indicated he had no policy about posting nurse staffing but it should be posted in the facility. 3.1-17(b)
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure by mouth (PO) medications, injectable medications and eye drops were stored separately, medications and food were not stored together, medications were labeled when opened and glucometers were stored in a separate bag for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed and 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed. (long hall cart, short hall cart and the medication room) Findings include: 1. During a medication storage observation, on 9/18/23 at 3:00 p.m., the long hall medication storage cart was observed to have the following: a. One bottle of lidocaine (a numbing injectable medication) was stored with a bottle of eye drops. b. The top drawer of the medication cart had lots of debris, dirt, and a brownish sticky substance all over the bottom. c. There was one glucometer sitting on top of the sticky top drawer and it was not in any type of wrapping or container. d. The bottom drawer on the right had lots of debris and dirt on it. e. The bottom drawer on the left had debris, dirt, and sticky substances on it. 2. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Administration Records (MARs) were documented completely to identify if the residents did or did not receive the prescribed medication for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for medication administration documentation. (Residents 6 and 28) Findings include: 1. The record for Resident 6 was reviewed on 9/20/23 at 2:19 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, depressive disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. A MAR, dated for the month of August 2023, indicated the following medications were not signed as administered or not administered: a. Aspirin (Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and blood thinner) 81 mg (milligram) one tablet daily on 8/25 and 8/31/23 at 9:00 a.m. b. Cyclobenzaprine (muscle relaxant) HCI 10 mg one tablet daily on 8/25 and 8/31/23 at 9:00 a.m. c. Doxepin (antidepressant) HCI 10 mg one tablet daily on 8/24/23 at 9:00 a.m. d. Famotidine (antacid) 40 mg one tablet daily on 8/25 and 8/31/23 at 9:00 a.m. e.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolatedSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Review (QAPI) committee had documentation of quarterly meetings, documentation of problem areas identified, documentation of staff feedback regarding identified problems and documentation if the problems had improved or worsened. Findings include: During an interview, on 9/21/23 at 2:32 p.m., the ED indicated the QAPI meets monthly although they only did QAPI reports 4 times a year. They would review falls, urinary tract infections (UTIs), activities and behaviors. They were also looking at staffing. He indicated there were no meeting minutes for the items reviewed. They were looking at falls and would communicate all the information verbally. There was no documentation about any processes being changed or implementation of new interventions or reports about the effectiveness of the changes. The QAPI meetings were used for the facility clinical meetings since they did not meet for daily or weekly clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the influenza vaccination after consenting to be vaccinated for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for infection control. (Resident 26) Finding includes: The record for Resident 26 was reviewed on 9/20/23 at 9:21 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, dementia, and heart disease. The record did not show he had received an influenza vaccine in 2022. An influenza vaccine consent was received by the resident's representative and was signed on 2/2/22. During an interview, on 9/20/23 at 10:54 p.m., the ED (Executive Director) indicated the resident did sign a consent for the 2022 influenza vaccine. He did not receive the vaccine because he slipped through the cracks. During an interview, on 9/21/23 at 2:33 p.m., the ED indicated he did not have a policy on providing influenza vaccinations to residents. A current policy, titled Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations, effective date 2016 and received at entrance conference indicated .The resident's medical record includes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a facility employee had documentation of receiving the Covid-19 vaccination or had obtained an exemption for the vaccine for 1 of 3 employees reviewed for Covid-19 vaccinations. (Activity Director) Finding includes: The Activity Director's record was reviewed on 9/20/23 at 9:21 a.m., which indicated the Activities Director did not have the Covid-19 vaccine or had documentation supporting refusal for the vaccine. During an interview, on 9/20/23 at 11:07 a.m., the ED (Executive Director) indicated the Activities Director was not Covid-19 vaccinated and did not have any documentation to support refusal or education for the vaccination. A current policy, titled COVID-19 Vaccination Requirements received at entrance conference, indicated .Providers participating in Medicare and Medicaid programs must ensure staff are fully vaccinated for COVID-19, unless exempt 3.1-18(b)(6)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-22 · tag F0912 — isolatedProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet (sq. ft.) per resident in 1 of 18 rooms. (room [ROOM NUMBER]) Finding includes: During the entrance conference, on 9/17/23 at 1:07 p.m., the Executive Director indicated there had been no physical changes to the room which had a previous room waiver since the last survey on 7/26/22. He indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] had two beds, two residents, and currently had a waiver. During an observation, on 9/18/23 at 3:26 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] was found to have 2 beds. It was noted two residents were occupying the room. A review of the facility measurements for room [ROOM NUMBER] indicated the bedroom did not provide 80 square feet per resident. room [ROOM NUMBER] was 153.83 sq. ft., and according to Life Safety Code the double occupancy in room [ROOM NUMBER] measured out to 76.9 sq. ft. per resident. A Bed Inventory form indicated room [ROOM NUMBER] was a Title 19 NF (Medicaid) room and was certified for two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms and the dining room were clean, painted, and free of debris and dirt for 4 of 36 rooms and 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for environment. (room [ROOM NUMBER], 1, 11, 13, and dining room) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 9/17/23 at 1:55 p.m., the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] had 4 brown round areas and 2 patches near the resident head of the bed which were painted the wrong color. 2. During an observation, on 09/17/23 at 11:23 a.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had no closet in the room. There was a clothes basket and belongings on the floor in the room. There was 1 small 2-layer plastic bin for some clothes. 3. During an observation, on 9/18/23 at 3:25 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER]'s-bathroom shower had a rusty drain and 3 spots where the shower floor was peeled. 4. During an observation, on 9/17/23 at 12:44 p.m., room [ROOM NUMBER] had approximately 2-foot black scuffs mark under the windows and missing trim by the closet. 5. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,189 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $8,189 — penalty dated 2023-09-22
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-20 for 8 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2015 |
| BAYSTON, BRETT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BRAND, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| CASTETTER, ANDREA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| COMPTON, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| FUNK, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2011 |
| HAWKINS, CLAUDE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2013 |
| HORNBECKER, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| PATRICK, LORI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2022 |
| REAGAN, JULIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 02/21/2025 |
| SCHMITS, FRED | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2015 |
| BRAVERMAN, KELLY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2021 |
| EMMINGER, DEBORAH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| SELLERS, DANIEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/24/2024 |
| GIBAULT CARE, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2015 |
| BANKS, JOE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/27/2024 |
| SHERA, RANDALL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/02/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $434K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155855. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.