Ambassador Healthcare
705 E Main St, Centerville, IN 47330 · For profit - Partnership · 137 certified beds · (765) 855-3424 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $42,078 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-19)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.5% | 11.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.9% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.4% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 1.1% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.1% | 25.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.9% | 11.9% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.0% | 23.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.1% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.8% | 3.6% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.5% | 23.3% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.1% | 13.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.2% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 75.5% | 79.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 17.3% | 22.2% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.5% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.90 | 1.61 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 1.44 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 93 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 42.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 58% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.7%CMS range 42.9–61.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.5–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 42.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 46.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 35.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 5.5–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.19 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 104.5 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.29 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.45 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents ' right to be free from sexual abuse for 3 of 3 male residents by a staff member while providing incontinence care. The staff member was on his first night of orientation without the presence of the regular staff member which he was paired with for his orientation for the shift. This action resulted in mental anguish for all 3 residents. (Residents B, C, D and CNA 3) This deficient practice resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy. The Immediate Jeopardy began on, 3-20-24 at approximately 2:00 a.m., when CNA 3 masturbated 1 of 3 residents. The Administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 4-17-24 at 11:55 a.m. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 3-27-24, but noncompliance remained at the lower scope and severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy. Findings include: The facility filed a reportable incident on 3-20-24 with the Indiana Department of Health, Long Term Care Division, citing concerns related to CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents maintained dignity by assisting residents with toileting needs in a timely manner, resulting in incontinence for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident 14) Findings Include: The clinical record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 5/7/26 at 12:05 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: morbid obesity (body mass index of 40 or higher), essential tremors (progressive neurological disorder that caused involuntary rhythmic shaking), mononeuropathy of bilateral upper limbs (damage to or compression of individual peripheral nerves in both arms or hands), and chronic pain syndrome. The care plan, dated 10/3/25 and revised 12/19/25, indicated Resident 14 had occasional episodes of bladder incontinence. An intervention was to provide moderate assistance with toilet transfers and hygiene. An interview was conducted with Resident 14 on 5/7/26 at 12:16 p.m. The resident indicated she could usually get herself onto the commode, but she needed assistance with wiping…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's bathing time preference for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for choices. (Resident 14)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 5/7/26 at 12:05 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: morbid obesity (body mass index of 40 or higher), essential tremors (progressive neurological disorder that caused involuntary rhythmic shaking), mononeuropathy of bilateral upper limbs (damage to or compression of individual peripheral nerves in both arms or hands), and chronic pain syndrome. The activities of daily living (ADL) care plan, revised on 12/19/25, indicated the resident required moderate assistance with self-care and mobility tasks related to weakness. An intervention was for staff to assist her with any areas of bathing she could not complete, initiated 10/3/25. The preferences and specifications care plan, revised 12/19/25, indicated the resident preferred to take a shower in the morning. An interview was conducted with Resident 14 on 5/7/26 at 12:11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from a resident's PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II determination and PASRR evaluation report for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASRR. (Resident 14)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 14 was reviewed on 5/7/26 at 12:05 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: bipolar disorder (mental health condition that causes extreme, uncontrollable shifts in a person's mood), anxiety, and attention deficit disorder (neurodevelopmental disorder marked by persistent patterns of inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity). The physician's orders indicated Resident 14 was prescribed Aripiprazole (antipsychotic medication) Oral Tablet 5 MG tablet in the morning for bipolar disorder, effective 11/17/25, and Desvenlafaxine Succinate ER (antidepressant medication) Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 100 MG one tablet in the morning for bipolar disorder, effective 11/17/25. The PASRR Level II , dates 3/12/26, indicated she needed to be provided with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to accurately and complete document eternal feeding and flush documentations for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for documentation accuracy. (Resident 98) The clinical record for Resident 98 was reviewed on 5/11/2026 at 11:09 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (progressive neurological disorder) and ventilator dependence. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/14/2026, indicated Resident 98 was cognitively impaired, had verbal outbursts that affected others, did not have weight loss, and was dependent on tube feeding. The assessment indicated Resident 98 had impaired mobility in all four extremities, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, and did not take nutrition by mouth.A care plan, dated 6/5/2024 and revised on 2/25/2026, indicated Resident 98 had specialized needs. The interventions included, but were not limited to, providing specialized dietary management including nothing by mouth and providing supplemental nutrition via enteral feedings.A nutritional care plan, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include the resident's family in a physician follow-up visit with the neurosurgeon's office, at their request, after the resident's back surgery for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for physician appointments. (Resident B)The findings include:During an interview with Resident B's family member on 8/11/25 at 1:30 p.m., she indicated the family and Resident B had a virtual doctor's appointment with neurosurgery scheduled for 7/28/25 at 9:15 a.m. Resident B's family member indicated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 had come into Resident B's room the morning of the appointment and mentioned something about a tablet to use for the appointment and Resident B's family member indicated she was not sure how to use the tablet. So, she wanted LPN 3 to have the doctor's office call her phone because the family, as well as the resident, wanted to speak to the surgeon about Resident B's fall the day before and not having the required back brace at the facility. The family member indicated the resident was capable of participating in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by not providing television (TV) remotes for newly admitted residents to watch TV per their preference for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. (Resident B and Resident D) Findings include: 1. During an interview with Resident B's family member on 8/11/25 at 1:30 p.m., they indicated Resident B was admitted , on 7/26/25, and had a TV remote with no batteries. Resident B's family member indicated the morning Resident B fell, on 7/27/25, he had been asking about his TV and thought he was getting out of bed to turn on the TV when he fell. Resident B's family member indicated the TV remote kept coming up missing during his stay at the facility and he really enjoyed watching TV. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia and atrial fibrillation. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure follow up was conducted on care concerns for a resident and the resident's family who had expressed multiple care concerns via email and follow the facility's policy pertaining to grievances for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident B)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and rib fracture.During an interview with Resident B's family member on 8/11/25 at 1:30 p.m., they indicated they emailed the Admission's Director a list of concerns that Resident B's family had throughout their stay at the facility. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/12/25 at 2:06 p.m., she indicated social services were responsible for filing a grievance.During an interview with the Social Service Director (SSD) on 8/12/25 at 2:25 p.m., she indicated she was aware that Resident B's family had concerns and believed the Admission's Director was handling them. The SSD indicated whoever…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's equipment of an enabler bar was functioning properly, failed to complete a thorough assessment after the resident's fall, and failed to implement fall interventions for a resident at high risk for falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident B)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and fracture of T11-T12 vertebra.An Admit/Readmit Screener, dated 7/26/25, indicated Resident B had recent falls and was at risk for falls. Bilateral side rails for the bed were indicated for safety. A Resident Fall Investigation Checklist was provided by the Executive Director on 8/12/25 at 10:00 a.m. It indicated Resident B had a fall in his room on 7/27/25 at 8:45 a.m. The checklist indicated side rails need to be positioned and bedside rail on left side was stuck down. During an interview with Resident B's family member on 8/11/25 at 1:30 p.m., they indicated Resident B was admitted , on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an inventory sheet with resident belongings for newly admitted residents for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for missing items. (Resident B, Resident D and Resident C)Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 8/11/25 at 11:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure. Resident B was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview on 8/12/25 at 1:30 p.m. with Resident B's family member, they indicated Resident B should have arrived at the facility, on 7/26/25, with a back brace and he did not. Resident B's family member indicated she contacted the hospital Resident B discharged from and they indicated he was discharged with the back brace on him for transport. The family member indicated the facility did not fill out an inventory sheet upon admission. No inventory sheet was documented in Resident B's Electronic Health Record (EHR). During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported to the Indiana Department of Health within two (2) hours of its receipt for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident D)Findings include:In an interview with Resident D on 7-17-25 at 11:20 a.m., she indicated a physical therapist (PT 3) had been rude to her in the recent past when PT 3 told her, Show me what you can do, indicating this occurred after she had kicked me off of physical therapy. She indicated she promptly shared this information with the Social Services Staff and the Executive Director. In an interview with the Executive Director (ED) on 7-17-25 at 1:15 p.m., the ED indicated he did not report this as an allegation of abuse to the state. He indicated as soon as the facility began their investigation, It was very clear it was not abuse, but merely the resident being told something that she did not want to hear by the PT, who tends to be rather direct. On 7-17-25 at 10:36 a.m., the ED provided a copy of a policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 30 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was referred for home health nursing services upon discharge for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge. (Resident B)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 7/17/25 at 11:10 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, mechanical complication of internal left knee prothesis, infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal left knee prosthesis, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 6/18/25. The 6/7/25 admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated he was cognitively intact.An interview was conducted with Resident B on 7/18/25 at 3:03 p.m. He indicated he had an infection in his leg and was on IV (intravenous) antibiotics four times a day while at the facility. When he was discharged from the facility on 6/18/25, they should have ordered nursing services for him, not just therapy. He wasn't able to get the IV antibiotics…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall interventions, as care planned; transfer a resident utilizing a gait belt, as required; ensure position change alarm use was monitored for efficacy on an on-going basis; and ensure position change alarm use was aimed at assisting staff to assess for patterns and routines of residents for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. (Residents 23, 31, 41, and 71) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 71 was reviewed on 4/24/25 at 11:55 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, and stage four pressure ulcer of sacral region. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 1/14/25 Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated she was cognitively intact. She was totally dependent for toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, and putting on/taking off footwear. She required substantial/maximal assistance with eating, oral hygiene, upper body dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy during care for 2 of 2 random observations (Resident 50 and Resident 36). Findings include: 1. During a medication pass observation on 4/28/25 at 10:10 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 11 knocked on Resident 50's door and walked in without waiting for a response. Resident 50 was standing up in front of his wheelchair and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 10 was applying an incontinent brief on the resident. The resident had no clothes on, and the privacy curtain was not pulled. Resident 50 was visible to the hallway. Review of the clinical record of Resident 50, on 4/30/25 at 11:10 a.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, diabetes, depression, and muscle weakness. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/3/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. 2. Review of the clinical record of Resident 36, on 4/28/25 at 10:35 a.m., indicated the diagnoses included,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. The clinical record for Resident 71 was reviewed on 4/24/25 at 11:55 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, and stage four pressure ulcer of sacral region. The 1/14/25 Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated she was cognitively intact. She was totally dependent for toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, and putting on/taking off footwear. She required substantial/maximal assistance with eating, oral hygiene, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene. An observation and interview were conducted with Resident 71 in her room on 4/24/25 at 11:59 a.m. She was lying in bed with the covers over her. Her call light was clipped to her outer cover but was wedged between her left side enabler bar and mattress. Resident 71 attempted to reach for her call light but was unable to reach it. She indicated, I can't reach it. I need my call light. An observation and interview were conducted with Resident 71 in her room on 4/30/25 at 1:14 p.m. She was lying in bed with the covers over her. Her call light cord was wrapped…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable sound levels for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 71) The clinical record for Resident 71 was reviewed on 4/24/25 at 11:55 a.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, and stage four pressure ulcer of sacral region. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 1/14/25 Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated she was cognitively intact. She was totally dependent for toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, and putting on/taking off footwear. She required substantial/maximal assistance with eating, oral hygiene, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene. The physician's orders indicated to check the function and placement of her bed and chair alarm every shift, effective 9/11/23. The 9/11/23 at risk for falls care plan indicated she would climb out of bed and onto the floor mat and unplug her bed alarm. Interventions were bed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care and oral care for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Resident 9, Resident 66 and Resident 23) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/23/25 at 1:05 p.m., Resident 9 had a dark substance underneath her fingernails on both hands. During an observation on 4/28/25 at 9:46 a.m., Resident 9 had a dark substance underneath her fingernails on both hands. During an observation and interview on 4/28/25 at 12:44 p.m., Resident 9 had a dark substance underneath her fingernails on both hands. Resident 9 indicated her fingernails were horrible. During an observation and interview on 4/29/25 at 10:08 a.m., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 12 verified Resident 9 had a black substance under her fingernails. CNA 12 indicated that the aides were supposed to clean her fingernails on bed bath days. Resident 9 received her bed bath on evening shift. CNA 12 indicated she was unsure if Resident 9 was a diabetic,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-30 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely provide optometry services and timely address a resident's missing glasses for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for vision services. (Residents 38 and 91) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 38 was reviewed on 4/24/25 at 12:10 p.m. Her diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cataracts, history of cerebral infarction, and dementia. The 3/26/25 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment indicated she was cognitively intact. An interview and observation were conducted with Resident 38 in her room on 4/24/25 at 12:13 p.m. She indicated she had a hard time seeing, needed glasses, and hadn't seen the optometrist lately. She was not wearing glasses at that time. The physician's orders indicated she may be seen by the optometrist, effective 3/22/19. The 3/30/20 facility optometry provider's Request for Services Consultation indicated to please have the optometrist examine Resident 38. The 6/30/23 eye exam indicated new…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pressure wound interventions for a resident at high risk of developing pressure areas for 1 or 2 residents reviewed for pressure wounds. (Resident 67) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 67 was reviewed on 4/28/2025 at 2:08 p.m. The medical diagnoses included anoxic brain injury and contractures. A Significant Change Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 2/14/2025, indicated Resident 67 was able to participate in his cognition exam, was severely cognitively impaired, and at risk for developing pressure areas. A skin care plan, last revised 4/7/2025, indicated to provide Resident 67 with wound care as ordered. A physician order, dated 4/24/2025, indicated to apply a foam dressing to the top of Resident 67's right foot as a preventative measure. A wound practitioner note, dated 4/28/2025, indicated for Resident 67 to encourage the use of pressure reducing (prevalon) boots at all times. During an observation on 4/29/2025 at 12:01 p.m., Resident 67 was observed in bed. Resident 67's pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and provide interventions for a resident with bilateral hand contractures for 1 of 2 residents revived for range of motion (ROM). (Resident 98) Findings include: Review of the clinical record of Resident 98, on [DATE] at 10:12 a.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anoxic brain damage, anxiety, and respiratory arrest. The admission assessment for Resident 98, dated [DATE], indicated both arms were contracted at varying degrees. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident 98, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. The resident had impairment on both sides of his upper extremities. The plan of care for Resident 98, revised date of [DATE], indicated the resident was at risk for skin breakdown due to bilateral upper extremity contractures. During an observation on [DATE] at 1:20 p.m., Resident 98 was lying in bed, the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers received the care and services required to treat the identified wound and documented the status of the wound routinely. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident B was reviewed on 2-10-25 at 11:02 a.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) with a dependency on supplemental oxygen, a history of TIA's (transient ischemic attacks or mini strokes), opioid abuse in remission, anxiety, polyneuropathy, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease and vascular dementia. His admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12-16-24, indicated Resident B was admitted to the facility with one unstageable pressure ulcer. In a telephone interview on 2-10-25 at 10:30 a.m., with a family member of Resident B, she indicated the skin issue to the coccyx area developed while he was at home, prior to going to an area hospital and then to the facility. A review of Resident B's nursing progress notes, dated 12-7-24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of the root cause of a fall and failed to implement a fall intervention for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident B). Findings include: Review of the clinical record for Resident B, on 1/7/25 at 1:30 p.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pain, hypertension, hypertensive heart disease, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, dementia, abnormal gait, anxiety, and osteoarthritis. A progress note for Resident B, dated 12/2/24 at 1:57 a.m., indicated the resident pushed the call light and was found on the floor next to the bed. The resident stated she had a headache prior to the fall and when she got out of the bed, she slid to the floor. The resident denied hitting her heard. There were no injuries noted. The resident was assisted back to bed. The resident indicated she was going to get a clean shirt and was assisted with changing her shirt. The physician was notified. A progress note…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have complete and accurate documentation of a resident's fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident B). Findings include: Review of the clinical record for Resident B, on 1/7/25 at 1:30 p.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic pain, hypertension, hypertensive heart disease, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, dementia, abnormal gait, anxiety, and osteoarthritis. A progress note for Resident B, dated 12/2/24 at 3:57 a.m., indicated the staff were checking on the resident often during the night. The resident was found sitting on the floor next to her bed. The resident indicated she was sitting on the side of the bed and slid off. There were no injuries noted. The resident was assisted back to bed. The resident's bed was in the lowest position and call light was in reach. The physician was notified. This progress note was struck out with lines through it, dated 12/2/24 at 8:04 a.m., with the strike out reason…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration was conducted in a safe manner and did not include leaving medication at a resident's bedside unattended for 1 of 25 residents rooms observed for unattended medications. (Resident G) Findings include: During random observations of 25 resident rooms for unattended medications on 12/4/24, between 12:58 p.m. and 2:00 p.m., with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON), one resident room was observed with two medication cups of two similar-looking white oblong tablets and observed in close proximity to Resident G. Resident G was observed seated in his recliner with his rollator located adjacent to the recliner. On the rollator, one pill cup containing two large, white oblong tablets were observed, with a second pill cup containing two large, white oblong tablets were observed on his overbed table. All four tablets appeared to resemble each other. Resident G indicated he had asked the nurse who provided the medication to him to leave the meds for him to take later. During the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from physical abuse for 2 of 13 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident K and Resident M) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident K, reviewed on 9/4/24 at 1:37 p.m., indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, cognitive communication deficit, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/1/24, indicated Resident K had severe cognitive impairment. Resident K exhibited other behavioral symptoms not directed towards others one to three days during the lookback period. A progress note written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2, dated 8/31/24 at 7:57 p.m., indicated, [Resident K] observed pacing unit making attempts to grab at peers. He did make contact to the wrist of one female peer and immediately let go when staff intervened. [Resident K] then repeated the grabbing of another female peer twisting her wrist. [Resident K] was redirected and he did let go after nursing staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly report an allegation of sexual abuse and report resident to resident physical altercations to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) for 4 of 13 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident N, Resident P, Resident K and Resident M). Findings include: 1. The incident report filed by the facility to IDOH, dated 9/2/24 at 2:35 a.m., indicated there was an alleged altercation between Resident N and Resident P. During an interview with the Administrator on 9/3/24 at 2:32 p.m., he indicated, on 9/2/24 during third shift, Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 10 reported to Registered Nurse (RN) 11 that Resident N reported to QMA 10 he had entered Resident P's room and touched her genitalia. RN 11 reported the incident to the Administrator and called the police. RN 11 assessed Resident P and there were no findings. Resident N was placed on 1 to 1 with staff. This was an ongoing investigation. During an interview with the Police Chief on 9/3/24 at 2:38 p.m., they indicated the police had obtained a standard Deoxyribonucleic Acid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete initial assessments after a fall and follow-up assessments after residents had a fall with injury for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident D and Resident C) Findings include: 1. Review of the clinical record of Resident D, on 9/3/24 at 11:40 a.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, dementia, unsteadiness on feet, muscle weakness, abnormal gait and anxiety. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident D, dated 6/8/24, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A progress note for Resident D, dated 8/23/24 at 9:01 a.m., indicated the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) met to discuss the resident's fall on 8/22/24. Resident D went into another resident's room and the other resident was helping Resident D leave her room and Resident D fell to the ground. The resident sustained a skin tear to her right elbow and voiced complaints of pain to the elbow. Range of motion (ROM) was per usual. An order was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-05 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and supervise a resident with dementia resulting in the potential for resident-to-resident interaction and failed to monitor and supervise residents on the memory care unit, assess residents, conduct follow-up, and notify family and the physician of inappropriate sexual contact between two residents for 4 of 13 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident N, Resident P, Resident K and Resident L) Findings include: 1a. Review of the clinical record of Resident N, on 9/5/24 at 1:34 p.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, osteoarthritis, major depressive disorder and insomnia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident N, dated 6/14/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. 1b. Review of the clinical record of Resident P, on 9/5/24 at 1:55 p.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, weakness, need for personal care, unsteadiness on feet, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policies and procedures related to abuse prohibition were implemented for the prohibition of staff to resident abuse, for reporting of an allegation of abuse within two hours of the facility learning of the abuse allegation to the Indiana Department of Health's Long Term Care Division and for ensuring all persons with any facts or observations who might have pertinent information related to the alleged abuse were included in the investigation for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for staff to resident abuse. (Residents B, C, D and CNA 3) Findings include: A. The facility filed a reportable incident on 3-20-24 with the Indiana Department of Health, Long Term Care Division, citing concerns related to CNA 3, touching two male residents inappropriately while providing personal care to them during the night shift of 3-19-24 into 3-20-24. The report indicated an investigation had begun and CNA 3 had been suspended, pending results of the investigation. In an interview with the Executive Director (ED) on 4-16-24 at 2:43…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident sexual abuse to the Indiana Department of Health's Long Term Care Division and other state agencies within two hours of the facility being made aware of the abuse. (Residents B, C, D and CNA 3) Findings include: The facility filed a reportable incident on 3-20-24 with the Indiana Department of Health, Long Term Care Division, citing concerns related to CNA 3, touching two male residents inappropriately while providing personal care to him during the night shift of 3-19-24 into 3-20-24. The report indicated an investigation had begun and CNA 3 had been suspended, pending results of the investigation. In an interview with the Executive Director (ED) on 4-16-24 at 2:43 p.m., he indicated on the morning of 3-20-24, he was informed by the Director of Nursing (DON) she had received a report of an allegation of sexual abuse regarding Resident C by CNA 3. On 4-16-24 at 4:55 p.m., the ED provided a copy of a timeline of events surrounding this incident. It indicated the DON received the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure beard restraints were utilized while working with food. This had the potential to affect 89 out of 94 residents who receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: A kitchen tour was conducted on 2/13/24 at 9:45 a.m., with the Dietary Manager (DM). [NAME] 22 was observed in the food preparation area with the DM and they both were observed with having facial hair and no beard restraint was utilized. Another kitchen tour was conducted on 2/13/24 at 10:47 a.m., with the DM and [NAME] 22. The food temperatures were obtained and both DM and [NAME] 22 were standing over the food without wearing a beard restraint. A kitchen observation was conducted on 2/16/24 at 10:43 a.m., with the DM and [NAME] 22 noted with facial hair and no utilization of a beard restraint. A kitchen observation and interview was conducted on 2/16/24 at 1:23 p.m., with the DM indicated [NAME] 22 has a clean cut to his facial hair and would not have to wear a beard restraint. The DM indicated [NAME] 24 and Dietary Staff 26, who were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviewed, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed timely, or at least every 92 days, for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for MDS timeliness. (Resident 36, 73, and 79) Findings include: 1 The clinical record for Resident 36 was reviewed on 2/19/2024 at 11:48 a.m. An admission record for Resident 36 indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of muscle weakness. An admission MDS Assessment for Resident 36 had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/24/2023. No follow up assessment was reflected on the record upon reviewed on 2/19/2024. A discharge assessment for Resident 36 was completed on 2/19/2024 and dated with an ARD date of 9/14/2023. 2. The clinical record for Resident 73 was reviewed on 2/19/2024 at 11:57 a.m. An admission record for Resident 73 indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. A Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident 73 had an ARD date of 9/29/2023. The next MDS assessment had an ARD date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to accurately code dental status for Resident 82, failed to accurately code Resident 79's urinary status, and failed to accurately code falls for Resident 93. This affected 3 of 34 residents reviewed. Findings include: 1. Resident 82 was observed, on 2/14/24 at 11:08 a.m., to have no teeth. Resident 82's record was reviewed on 2/15/24 at 10:53 a.m. The record indicated Resident 82 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, stroke, difficulty swallowing, and cognitive communication deficit. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/7/23, indicated no natural teeth or tooth fragment(s) (edentulous) was not marked, which indicated the resident did have teeth. On 2/19/24 at 2:00 p.m., the MDS coordinator, provided paperwork from her admission assessment where the family had said she had her own teeth, and this was documented on the baseline care plan. The MDS coordinator indicated the MDS should have been been marked for the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to update Resident 12's care plan after refusal to use a lap buddy, failed to update a care plan after Resident 2 had bruising, and failed to update Resident 93's care plan with fall interventions. This affected 3 of 34 residents reviewed for care plan revisions. Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 2/15/24 at 10:42 a.m., Resident 12 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room, watching TV. She did not have a lap buddy (a firm, flat, pillow like device to provide upper body support, help with posture, and reminds residents to ask for help before getting out of their chair) in place. On 2/15/24 at 2:40 p.m., Resident 12 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room, eyes closed, TV on, and had no lap buddy in place. On 2/16/24 at 9:00 a.m., Resident 12 was sitting in her wheelchair in her room, TV on, and had no lap buddy in place. On 2/19/24 at 10:20 a.m., Resident 12 was sitting in her doorway in her wheelchair and had no lap buddy in place. Resident 12's record was reviewed on 2/14/24 at 2:45 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dependent resident with nail care, and failed to ensure facial hair was to a resident's preference. This affected 2 of 7 residents reviewed for activities of daily living care. (Residents 82 and 93) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 2/14/24, at 11:07 a.m., Resident 82's nails were observed to be long with a black substance on the nails of both hands. On 2/15/24, at 10:33 a.m., Resident 82 was observed to have a yellow substance under some of the nails on her right hand, and her left hand had a black substance under 2 of the nails that were observable due to the left hand contracture. On 2/15/24, at 2:38 p.m., Resident 82 sat near the nurse's desk, in a Broda (a specialty chair for comfort and mobility) chair, asleep. The fingernails on her right hand were soiled with a dark substance, her left hand was contracted and unable to view at that time. Resident 82's record was reviewed on 2/15/24, at 10:53 a.m., and indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, stroke, left sided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide in room activities for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for activities (Resident 59). Finding include: During an observation on 2/13/24 at 11:18 a.m., Resident 59 was sitting in her room with no TV or radio on, no magazine, books or any self initiated activities available. The resident was sitting in her recliner staring at the wall. During an observation on 2/14/24 at 2:35 p.m., Resident 59 was sitting in her room with no TV or radio on, no magazine, books or any self initiated activities available. The resident was sitting in her recliner staring at the wall. During an observation on 2/15/24 at 1:48 p.m., Resident 59 was sitting in her room with no TV or radio on, no magazine, books any self initiated activities available. The resident was sitting in her recliner staring at the wall. Review of the record of Resident 59 on 2/19/24 at 1:20 p.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited, schizoaffective disorder, dementia, vascular dementia, unsteadiness on feet, abnormal gait, bipolar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to date a gastrostomy tube (G-Tube) dressing and failed to date the piston irrigation syringe for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for G-Tube (Resident 49). Finding include: During an observation on 2/13/24 at 11:25 a.m., Resident 49's piston irrigation syringe was sitting on her bedside table with no date and the resident's G-tube dressing was not dated. During an observation on 2/14/24 at 2:40 p.m., Resident 49's piston irrigation syringe was sitting on her bedside table with no date and the resident's G-tube dressing was not dated During an observation on 2/15/24 at 1:49 p.m., Resident 49's piston irrigation syringe was sitting on her bedside table dated 2/15/24 and the resident's G-tube dressing was dated 2/15/24. Review of the record of Resident 49 on 2/15/24 at 10:10 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, apraxia, difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, anxiety,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound treatments were signed off as administered, conduct weekly would assessments on a pressure ulcer, and ensure there was not multiple treatments for the same pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 2/16/24 at 2:23 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pressure ulcer of sacral region, peripheral vascular disease, acquired absence of left leg below knee, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic pain. An admission nursing assessment, dated 8/17/23, indicated shearing above coccyx and bilateral buttocks. A wound assessment, dated 8/29/23, indicated a stage 2 pressure ulcer was present to Resident B's coccyx. The coccyx wound was documented as resolved on 9/19/23. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/10/23, indicated a stage 4 pressure ulcer, diabetic foot ulcer, along with infection of the foot. A wound care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide Passive Range Of Motion (PROM) exercises for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Range Of Motion (ROM) (Resident 49). Finding include: During an observation and interview on 2/13/24 at 11:27 a.m., Resident 49 had a left hand contracture with no splint in place. The resident indicated she did not want to wear a splint. During an observation and interview on 2/15/24 at 1:49 p.m., Resident 49 had a left hand contracture. The resident indicated the staff did not provide her with PROM exercises and she would like to participate in a PROM program. Review of the record of Resident 49 on 2/15/24 at 10:10 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, muscle weakness, major depressive disorder, post traumatic stress disorder, apraxia, difficulty walking, unsteadiness on feet, anxiety, hemiplegia/hemiparesis and cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. The plan of care for Resident 49, dated 3/13/23, indicated the resident had left sided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented and failed to transfer a resident in a safe manner for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 87 and Resident 72). Finding include: 1.) During an interview with Resident 87 on 2/13/24 at 11:43 a.m., indicated she had a fall in the last six months, she was unsure what caused her to fall. During an observation on 2/14/24 at 2:50 p.m., Resident 87 was lying in bed, there was no fall mat beside her bed. During an observation on 2/15/24 at 1:56 p.m., Resident 87 was lying in bed, there was no fall mat beside her bed. Review of the record of Resident 87 on 2/19/24 at 2:10 p.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, dementia, muscle weakness, age related physical debility, hypertension, major depressive disorder and rheumatoid arthritis. The Quarterly Minimum Data (MDS) assessment for Resident 87, dated 12/9/23, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. The fall risk assessment for Resident 87,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to date oxygen tubing and storage bag, failed to store oxygen tubing in a sanitary manner when not in use and failed to have a physician order for oxygen therapy for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory therapy (Resident 72 and Resident 2). Findings include: 1.) During an observation 2/13/24 on 11:57 a.m., Resident 72 had a portable oxygen on her wheelchair, the resident was receiving oxygen via nasal cannula. The oxygen tubing and the storage bag was not dated. During an observation on 2/14/24 at 2:45 p.m , Resident 72 had a portable oxygen on her wheelchair, the oxygen tubing and nasal cannula was lying the seat of her wheelchair not stored in the storage bag. The oxygen tubing and the storage bag was not dated. During an observation on 2/15/24 at 1:58 p.m., Resident 72 had a portable oxygen on her wheelchair, the oxygen tubing and nasal cannula was lying the wheelchair wheel not stored in a storage bag. CNA 1 indicated hospice staff must not have put it in the storage bag when they assisted the resident to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$42,078 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $42,078 — penalty dated 2024-04-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITAL | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2011 |
| MANTOOTH, MELISSA | Individual | CONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 07/01/2019 |
| BARDOCZI, STEPHEN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | — | since 09/02/2013 |
| BAYSTON, BRETT | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| BRAND, JOHN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2015 |
| CASTETTER, ANDREA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| HAWKINS, CLAUDE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/01/2013 |
| HORNBECKER, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| BRAVERMAN, KELLY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/01/2021 |
| SELLERS, DANIEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/21/2024 |
| AMBASSADOR CENTERVILLE MANAGEMENT, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/02/2022 |
| FUERST, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/02/2022 |
| KOFMAN, MENACHEM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/02/2022 |
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155490. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.