Westminster Village Kentuckiana

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 56.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 60 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.88 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 96% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 66.2 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.12 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner related to the drywall hanging down and gaps in construction for 1 of 1 kitchen observations. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 64 of 65 residents residing in the facility. Findings include:On 6/23/26, between 8:30 a.m. and 9:15 a.m., the following was observed in the kitchen: -The ceiling to the left of the food prep table had a taped area that was dislodged with a 4-inch gap. The drywall was hanging down from the area,-A piece of board that had been nailed to the ceiling, measuring 3 feet by 3 feet, was observed bowing on two different sides with a 2-inch gap which was located over a food prep table. A 4-slice toaster was observed directly under it.During an interview on 6/23/26 at 9:03 a.m., the Dietary Manager indicated maintenance staff pulled it down and did not tape it back up. She mentioned it in the morning meeting last Friday, 6/19/26, and it was still hanging down today. On 6/22/26 at 12:56 p.m., the healthcare Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pest control services were timely and effective. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 65 of 65 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 6/23/26 at 11:00 a.m., the pest activity logs were reviewed and indicated the following pest concerns:- rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], staff reported weird looking bugs on 3/7/26- Admissions office, staff reported ants on 3/9/26A- room [ROOM NUMBER], family reported ants on 3/23/26- room [ROOM NUMBER], staff reported ants on 4/28/26- room [ROOM NUMBER], staff reported ants on 5/15/26- room [ROOM NUMBER], staff reported ants on 5/18/26- room [ROOM NUMBER], roaches were reported on 5/19/26- room [ROOM NUMBER], staff reported bugs on 6/8/28- room [ROOM NUMBER], staff reported ants on 6/23/26Review of the pest control treatment services indicated the facility pest service treated the facility on 1/20/26 and 5/11/26.The pest control treatment services lacked documentation of which resident rooms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility to ensure the kitchen equipment, floors, and meal carts were clean and sanitary. This deficient practice affected 64 of 64 residents who currently received meals from the kitchen.Findings Include:1.During the initial kitchen tour, on 1/13/26 at 9:00 a.m., the following areas of concern were observed: -The dish machine had three areas of long white lime streaks going down the front of the dish washer.-The steam table machine had a heavy soil of yellow, brown and black material inside the two doors at the bottom. The same soil was observed along the sliding edge of the two doors and along the edge below the five control knobs.-Inside the two closed food carts, there were multiple brown and white spills on the bottom of the carts. One cart had lunch trays set up waiting for the food.-The floor underneath the flat top grill, had multiple brown spills and grease on it.-The fryer had a moderate amount of brown particles in the oil and along the inside shelf of the fryer. The fryer was greasy and sticky to the touch along the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure glucometers were cleaned per guidelines for infection control when obtaining blood sugar readings for 4 of 4 residents observed for glucometer use. (Residents 71, 45, 33, and 7)Findings include:1. During an observation, on 1/14/26 at 10:59 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4 indicated that each resident had their own glucometer. The LPN entered Resident 71's room and completed the accu-check (blood sugar monitoring). The resident's blood sugar reading indicated 296 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). The LPN administered the required dosage of Lispro insulin. The LPN had placed the glucometer back into the resident's glucometer holder in the top drawer of the medication cart, without cleaning it. There was no visible blood or stains on the glucometer. During an interview, on 1/14/26 at 11:02 a.m., LPN 4 indicated the glucometers were usually cleaned after he had obtained all of each resident's blood sugar readings during the day. I can clean it if you want me to. He obtained the Sani-Cloth wipe and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' choices for likes, dislikes and requests for special food items on their food trays cards were honored at every meal. This deficient practice affected 19 of 64 residents reviewed for tray cards. (Residents 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 17, 20, 34, 38, 40, 51, 55, 57, 58, 62, 63 , 64, 65, and 66) Findings include:During an interview with Resident 7 on 1/13/26 at 9:45 a.m., she indicated that she frequently did not receive what was ordered on her tray card.During an interview with Resident 51 on 1/13/26 at 9:50 a.m., she indicated the kitchen was not following what was written on their tray cards. She indicated that her tray card, under dislikes, listed No Sausage or Eggs, but she still received them every morning anyway. She sent them back every time as she did not eat them. Observation of her tray card at this time, indicated sausage and eggs were listed under the dislike section. Observation of her plate indicated she received sausage and eggs for breakfast.During an observation of the main dining room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of urine received the necessary care and services of brief changes before the brief and bed padding underneath the resident was not overly saturated with urine for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. (Resident 13)Findings include:During an observation, on 1/13/26 at 10:00 a.m., upon entering Resident 13's room, there was a strong odor of urine and feces present. Observation of Resident 13 in bed, indicated the resident was lying on a draw pad under her which was observed to have a light brown stain that covered the whole pad, within an inch of the edges. The resident's brief and pad was observed to be saturated with urine. A second observation of the resident's room, on 1/13/26 at 2:30 p.m., the soiled pad remained on her bed and was still wet to the touch. The resident was in an activity at this time.During an observation of the resident and her bed, from 1/14/26 to 1/21/26, with a confidential informant, the resident's brief was observed to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a history of Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) was provided proper management of the urinary catheter drainage system by maintaining the drainage system off the floor for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. (Resident 33)Findings include:During an observation, on 1/13/25 between 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m., Resident 33 had been in the dining room for 60 minutes with her urinary catheter collection bag and tubing sitting on the floor. The resident had been rolling in her wheelchair back and forth across the catheter tubing with the wheelchair wheels. There were multiple staff members in the dining room at that time. During an observation, on 1/15/26 at 8:30 a.m., Resident 33 was lying in bed and just finished eating her breakfast. Her foley catheter was sitting on the floor with no barrier between the indwelling urinary catheter collection bag and the floor.During an observation, on 1/15/25 at 1:00 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-20 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with the adaptive equipment necessary to maintain independence while eating or drinking for 1 of 1 resident who utilized adaptive feeding equipment reviewed. (Resident 9)Findings include: During a dining room observation, on 1/13/26 at 12:50 p.m., the tray card for Resident 9 indicated he was to have a two handled cup for liquids. No two handled cup was present and he was drinking from plastic cups with no handles for his tea and water.An interview with the Staff Coordinator, on 1/13/26 at 1:00 p.m., she indicated as far as she knew, the resident did not require any specific adaptive devices at meal times.During a second observation of the dining room on 1/16/26 at 12:45 p.m., Resident 9 was observed drinking his shake, water and tea from a regular plastic cup. No two handled cups were in sight.The record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 1/16/2026 at 1:39 p.m., The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, transient cerebral ischemic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-04 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure misappropriation of resident property did not occur for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for misappropriation. (Resident B)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 9/2/25 at 2:24 p.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, diabetes, depression and chronic pain.The physician's order, dated 6/3/25, indicated the resident was to receive Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 5-325 mg (milligrams) every 6 hours as needed for pain.Review of the pharmacy delivery receipt, dated 8/16/25 at 6:45 p.m., indicated the resident's 30 Hydrocodone-Apap (acetaminophen) 5-325 mg were delivered and signed for by LPN 6.The incident report, dated 8/16/25, indicated on 8/19/25 Registered Nurse (RN) 7 called the pharmacy to find out why a narcotic medication that was ordered for Resident B had not been delivered. The pharmacy reported that 30 tablets of the narcotic pain medication was delivered on 8/16/25. The pharmacy sent over the signature page which showed the narcotic pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an assessment was completed by a licensed nurse and authorization given to administer an as needed narcotic pain medication by a qualified medication aide for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident C)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 9/3/25 at 9:55 a.m. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fibromyalgia, depression and pain.The physician's order, dated 6/20/25, indicated the resident was to receive oxycodone with acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 7.5 mg (milligrams) every 4 hours as needed for pain.The August controlled drug record indicated the resident received the as needed pain medication on the following dates and times by Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 10: 7/31/25 at 8:00 p.m., 8/01/25 at 12:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m., 8/09/25 at 9:15 p.m., 8/10/25 at 12:30 a.m., 4:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., 8/11/25 at 12:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m., 8/13/25 at 9:00 p.m., 8/14/25 at 12:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m., 8/15/25 at 12:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN