Vermillion Convalescent Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 78.6 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.76 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.90 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident was assessed and a physician order was obtained prior to utilizing an audible bed and chair alarm for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for falls (Resident B). Findings include:On 6/17/26 at 12:35 p.m. during an initial observation and interview, Resident B sat in the main dining room with her husband. She was alert with some confusion noted during the interview. The resident indicated she had some falls but had not been hurt any of the times she fell. The resident was sitting in her wheelchair on a black air filled cushion and an incontinent pad. No anti-skid material was observed in the wheelchair. Observed anti-tip bars to the lower bottom of the wheelchair. The bars were upside down. No alarm observed on the chair. The husband indicated there was an alarm on the bed and usually there was a chair alarm and indicated the staff must have forgotten to put the chair alarm back on when they had gotten her up earlier. On 6/17 26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed during the medication pass and appropriate infection control techniques were utilized for 5 of 5 residents medication passes observed (Residents 33, 36, 48, 28, and 62). B. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) (use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities) were followed for 2 of 5 residents' medication passes observed (Residents 33 and 10). Findings include:A. On 8/15/25 at 8:06 a.m., Registered Nurse (RN) 22 was observed preparing medication for Resident 33. During the preparation, one of the pills fell onto the medication cart. RN 22 picked up the pill bare-handed and placed it into the medication cup. RN 22 entered Resident 33's room, put on gloves, and completed the resident's accu-check (finger stick to check blood sugar). The resident's blood sugar was 69 milligrams (mg)/deciliter (dl). RN 22 did not perform hand hygiene before or after the accu-check. At the same…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure informed consent documents for psychotropic medications had been obtained, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Residents 73 and 1). Findings include: 1.Resident 73's record was reviewed on 8/14/25 at 11:43 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, severe, with agitation (dementia that severely impacts daily life and functioning with agitation), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disorder that gradually impairs memory, thinking, and reasoning skills, eventually affecting the ability to perform simple tasks), anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness that interferes with daily life), and irritability and anger. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/15/25, indicated the resident had severe cognitive deficit, physical behavioral symptoms directed towards…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within the reach of the residents for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for call light placement (Residents 25 and 23).Findings include:1. On 8/14/2025 at 1:32 p.m., during initial routine observation, observed Resident 25 sleeping in bed. Call light was not within reach of the resident. Unable to locate the call light. On 8/15/2025 at 1:34 p.m., observed Resident 25 sitting in a recliner in her room. The call light was attached to the middle of the curtain within the folds of the curtain residents bed at the foot of the bed. The resident was unable to answer any interview questions. On 8/18/25 at 10:40 a.m., during an interview Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 6 indicated she makes sure the call light was within reach of residents even if the resident did not use the call light. On 8/18/25 at 11:50 a.m., during an interview Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 8 indicated she would make sure the call light was within reach of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided showers as preferred for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for choices (Resident 51). Findings include: During an interview, on 8/13/25 at 3:28 p.m., Resident 51 indicated she thought that the staff often forgot about her, and she did not receive her showers as scheduled. She was unable to recall when her last shower was. Resident 51's record was reviewed on 8/15/25 at 10:10 a.m. A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/6/25, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance with showers and toileting. A care plan, dated 5/15/25, indicated the resident requires assistance from 1-2 staff in preforming activities of daily living (ADL's) related to shortness of breath, pain, and incontinence. Interventions included, but were not limited to, offer bathing choices, showers/baths per schedule and more frequently if requested and as needed, and nail care as needed. Review of shower schedule indicated Resident 51 was to receive her showers on Tuesday and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical and verbal abuse for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 1).Findings include:On 8/18/25 at 9:36 a.m., an allegation of abuse was reported by the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC). Review of facility reported incident indicated an allegation of abuse was reported to IDOH on 8/16/25 at 8:40 a.m., by the facility Administrator. The report indicated Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) 8 and 12 were caring for Resident 1's roommate in the first bed. Both CNAs saw CNA 11 at the bedside of Resident 1 in the same room, pulling Resident 1's hand off of the side rail, pushing the resident's arm into his stomach, speaking abruptly to the resident, and using profanity. The CNAs 8 and 12 immediately intervened and prevented further interaction between CNA 11 and the resident. A skin tear was noted to Resident 1's right arm. The CNA 11 responded that it was there last night and she didn't do it. However, one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the administrator was notified immediately of an allegation of abuse of 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident 1). Findings include:On 8/18/25 at 9:36 a.m., an allegation of abuse was reported by the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC). Review of facility reported incident indicated an allegation of abuse was reported to IDOH on 8/16/25 at 8:40 a.m., by the facility Administrator. The report indicated Certified Nursing Aides (CNAs) 8 and 12 were caring for Resident 1's roommate in the first bed. Both CNAs saw CNA 11 at the bedside of Resident 1 in the same room, pulling Resident 1's hand off of the side rail, pushing the resident's arm into his stomach, speaking abruptly to the resident, and using profanity. The CNAs 8 and 12 immediately intervened and prevented further interaction between CNA 11 and the resident. A skin tear was noted to Resident 1's right arm. The CNA 11 responded that it was there last night and she didn't do it. However,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fingernail care was provided for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs) (Resident 23). Findings include: On 8/13/25 at 11:13 a.m., Resident 23's fingernails on the right hand were observed to be long and jagged with dark debris underneath them. On 8/14/25 at 10:12 a.m., Resident 23 was observed up in his wheelchair. The resident's fingernails on the right hand remained long and jagged with dark debris underneath them. On 8/15/25 at 1:49 p.m., Resident 23 was observed lying in bed. The resident's fingernails on the right hand remained long and jagged with dark debris underneath them. On 8/18/25 at 9:12 a.m., Resident 23 was observed up in his wheelchair. The resident's fingernails on the right hand remained long and jagged with dark debris underneath them. Resident 23's record was reviewed on 8/18/25 at 9:26 a.m. Diagnoses on the resident's profile included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (brain tissue death due to lack of blood supply) unspecified and hemiplegia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure they communicated effectively with the wound specialist nurse practitioner (NP) when a resident developed a new pressure ulcer and failed to ensure appropriate infection control techniques were utilized during a dressing change for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident 3). Findings include:On 8/15/25 at 2:39 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 10 and the Director of Nursing (DON) were observed completing Resident 3's dressing changes to the coccyx (tailbone) and right hip. LPN 10 washed her hands, donned gloves, and removed the dressings from the resident's coccyx and right hip while wearing the same gloves. LPN 10 removed her gloves and donned a new pair of gloves but did not perform hand hygiene during the glove change. LPN 10 cleansed the wound to the resident's coccyx, removed her gloves, and donned a new pair but did not perform hand hygiene during the glove change. LPN 10 applied skin prep (protective skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a indwelling urinary catheter (catheter; a tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to drain urine) was kept from touching the floor, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident 73).Findings include: During a random observation, on 8/13/25 at 3:22 p.m., the resident was observed sitting in his wheelchair in the activity room. His catheter bag (bag where urine was collected) was covered with a cloth covering and was in contact with the floor. During a random observation, on 8/15/25 at 11:03 a.m., the resident was observed sitting in his wheelchair at the activity room table. The catheter bag was covered with a cloth covering and the tubing was in contact with the floor. Resident 73's record was reviewed on 8/14/25 at 11:43 a.m. The profile indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, infection and inflammatory reaction due to indwelling urethral catheter (germs have entered the urinary tract through the catheter, causing an infection), urinary tract…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN