Willow Crossing Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 50 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 102.3 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of physical and mental abuse by a staff member purposely and forcefully causing a resident to fall from the wheelchair onto the floor. This resulted in the staff member leaving the resident lying on the floor with no assistance, she walked away from the resident going into other resident rooms, while another resident was maneuvering their wheelchair around the resident, and the staff member failed to provide accurate details related to the fall for assessment and follow-up care for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident B). Using the reasonable person concept, it is likely this would lead to fear, confusion, anxiety, and intimidation for Resident B. Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 02/17/2026 at 11:22 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/2025, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, anxiety, and unspecified dementia (decline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to hold parameters and obtaining vital signs for cardiac medications for 7 of 21 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Residents 44, 62, 30, 10, 3, 8, and 104) Findings include:1.The clinical record for resident 44 was reviewed on 03/10/2026 at 10:30 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/01/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hypertension. An open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 12/22/2025, indicated the resident was to be given midodrine 10 milligrams (mg) twice a day for orthostatic hypertension. The staff were to hold, not give, the medication, if the resident's systolic blood pressure (top number) was greater than 130. The January, February, and March 2026 Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) indicated the resident had received the medication on the following days and times when the resident's systolic blood pressure was greater than 130: -On 01/03/2026 from 6:30…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident records in a private manner related to computer screens being left open with resident information visible for 3 random observations. (Residents 32 and 33)Findings include:During an observation, on 03/09/2026 at 10:18 A.M., the computer screen on the 100 Hall Medication Cart 1 was observed to have Resident 32's personal and medical information visible and was left unattended. - On 03/09/2026 at 10:18 A.M., a staff member walked by the medication cart,- On 03/09/2026 at 10:19 A.M., a resident walked by the medication cart, - On 03/09/2026 at 10:19 A.M., a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) walked by the medication cart,- On 03/09/2026 at 10:20 A.M., RN 3 returned to the medication cart. During an observation, on 03/09/2026 at 11:58 A.M., the computer screen on the 100 Hall Medication Cart 2 was observed to have resident information visible and was left unattended. - On 03/09/2026 at 11:59 A.M., the Administrator and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) walked by the medication cart,- On 03/09/2026 at 12:00 P.M.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and observation, the facility failed to ensure appropriate procedure was followed during providing care for a suprapubic urinary catheter replacement for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 78) Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 78 was reviewed on 03/09/2026 at 9:46 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/30/2026, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, neurogenic bladder (dysfunction of the urinary bladder caused by nervous system damage), and obstructive uropathy (structural or functional blockage of urine flow anywhere along the urinary tract). The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. The Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) for February and March 2026, indicated the resident had received the antibiotic Ciprofloxacin 250 milligrams twice a day from 02/25/2026 through 03/03/2026 for a urinary tract infection. The procedure for changing the resident's indwelling suprapubic urinary catheter was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have medications available to residents for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. (Residents 10 and 104)Findings include: 1.The clinical record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 03/10/2026 at 11:50 A.M. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/12/2026, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, non-Alzheimer's dementia (mental decline). An open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 09/09/2025, indicated the resident was to be given Aricept (a dementia medication) 10 mg at bedtime. The January, February, and March, 2026 EMAR indicated the resident did not receive the medication on the following dates due to the medication being unavailable: 01/03/2026, 01/04/2026, 01/11/2026, 01/17/2026, 01/18/2026, 01/25/2026, 01/31/2026, 02/05/2026, 02/07/2026, 02/08/2026, 02/14/2026, 02/15/2026, 02/16/2026, 02/19/2026, 02/21/2026, 02/22/2026, 02/28/2026, 03/01/2026, 03/07/2026, and 03/08/2026. 2. Resident 104's clinical record was reviewed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to track infections for 3 of 12 residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. (Residents 10, 22, and 78)Findings include:1.The clinical record for Resident 10 was reviewed on 03/10/2026 at 11:50 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/12/2026, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to, urinary tract infection. A physician's order, dated 09/19/2025 through 09/24/2025, indicated the resident was to be given Avycaz (an antibiotic medication) 2.5 grams, every 8 hours for resistance to carbapenem (an antibiotic medication), for a urinary tract infection. The Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) indicated the resident had received the medication. The September 2025 Infection Control Tracking Log lacked indication the resident had received an antibiotic in September 2025. A physician's order, dated 11/14/2025 through 11/21/2025, indicated the resident was to be given Cipro (an antibiotic) 250 milligrams (mg), twice a day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a major mental illness was appropriately supervised during a physical/mental outburst for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for behavior health services. (Resident B). Findings include:The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 02/17/2026 at 11:22 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/2025, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, depression, anxiety, unspecified dementia (mental decline), and a history of visual hallucinations. The resident utilized a wheelchair and walker for mobility. An Incident Report, dated 02/11/2026 at 11:23 P.M., indicated Resident B had grabbed a stationary chair that Resident F was sitting in, and made negative comments towards them. The staff intervened to separate the two residents. Resident B continued to go towards the staff and Resident F in an intimidating manner. A Progress Note, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders related to medication hold parameters for 2 of 22 residents reviewed for Quality of Care. (Residents 71 and 5) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 71 was reviewed on 02/17/25 at 9:00 A.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/13/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, heart failure, hypertension, diabetes, and depression. The current open-ended physician's order, with a start date of 09/03/24, indicated the resident was to receive Lisinopril (a blood pressure medication) 10 milligrams (mg), twice a day. The staff were to hold the medication when the systolic blood pressure (SBP) was less than 130 or the heart rate was less than 60. The January and February 2025 Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) indicated the resident had received the medication when the blood pressure was less than 130 or the heart rate was less than 60 on the following dates and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent and ensure a resident's wound was identified prior to the resident developing a Stage III pressure ulcer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 64) Findings include: The resident's clinical record was reviewed on 02/18/25 at 1:29 P.M. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 07/16/24, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, hemiplegia affecting the right dominate side, malnutrition, dementia, peripheral vascular disease, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The resident was always incontinent of bowel and had an indwelling urinary catheter. The resident was dependent on staff for toileting, hygiene, and mobility, including rolling left to right. The resident was at risk for pressure ulcers but had no pressures at the time of the assessment. The resident utilized pressure reducing devices for the bed and chair. The clinical record lacked documentation the resident had been absent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document meal consumption values for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents 55 and 62) Findings include: 1. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/29/25, indicated Resident 55 was cognitively intact. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, urinary tract infection, seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, and bipolar. The resident had experienced weight loss. A Weight Loss Care Plan, with a start date of 01/18/25, included, but was not limited to, the following intervention: Monitor meal consumption and encourage resident to consume 100% (percent) of meals. The January and February 2025 Meal Consumption Record for the resident lacked documented meal intake values for the following dates: - 01/18/25 at dinner, - 01/26/25 at lunch, - 02/03/25 at breakfast, - 02/10/25 at dinner, and - 02/17/25 at breakfast. 2. A Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/27/24, indicated Resident 62 was severely cognitively impaired. The resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store medications appropriately for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed. (Back 200 Medication Cart and Front 100 Medication Cart) Findings include: 1. The Back 200 Medication Cart was observed, on 02/18/25 at 2:33 P.M, with Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 9. The medication cart contained the following loose pills laying loose in the bottom of the drawers: - two small round white tablets, - one small oval white tablet, and - one small oval blue tablet. The medication cart had several bits of debris/paper that were scattered heavily throughout the cart. During an , on 02/18/25 at 2:35 P.M., QMA 9 indicated she didn't clean the medication cart; she just passed the medications. 2. The Front 100 Medication Cart was observed, on 02/18/25 at 2:39 P.M., with QMA 8. The medication cart contained the following loose pills laying loose in the bottom of the drawers. - one small round white tablet, - one medium round white tablet, and - one large round white tablet. The medication cart had several bits of debris/paper that were scattered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN