No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Majestic Care Of Connersville

1029 E 5th Street, Connersville, IN 47331 · For profit - Corporation · 113 certified beds · (765) 825-0543 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Oct 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1475 E State Road 44 · (765) 935-8943 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
1449 E 5th St · (765) 825-5151 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1066 East 5th Street

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.9%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms81.4%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.6%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.1%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication52.5%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.1%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.0%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.1%79.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.4%22.2%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.8%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.841.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.971.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.02U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.6–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay5.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 4.1–14.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.471.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.82
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 81.8 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-27)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-10-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from sexual abuse from Resident C towards Resident B and Resident G, resulting in Resident B experiencing anxiety and fear for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for sexual abuse (Resident C, Resident B and Resident G). Findings include:1a. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 10/27/25 at 10:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia, depression, anxiety, hypertension, heart failure and epilepsy. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident C, dated 8/22/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. The resident was independent with ambulation. The clinical record of Resident C indicated the resident resided on the memory care unit from 4/8/25 until 6/30/25. The resident was moved to the Long Term Care unit on 6/30/25. A progress note for Resident C, dated 6/29/25 at 6:12 p.m., indicated the resident was found with his left hand inside a female resident's shirt and had her right breast…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-10-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation and ensure protection from further allegations of sexual abuse resulting in a second allegation of abuse where the resident experienced anxiety and fear for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for sexual abuse (Resident C, Resident B, and Resident G).Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 10/27/25 at 10:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia, depression, anxiety, hypertension, heart failure and epilepsy. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident C, dated 8/22/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. The resident was independent with ambulation. The safety checks for Resident C, dated 10/5/25 through 10/9/25, indicated the resident was being monitored every 15 minutes for sexually acting out. There was no further documentation in the resident's clinical record pertaining to any behaviors that led to the 15-minute checks being initiated. The safety checks for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for sexual abuse (Resident C and Resident G). Findings include:1. The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 10/27/25 at 10:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia, depression, anxiety, hypertension, heart failure and epilepsy. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident C, dated 8/22/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. The resident was independent with ambulation. The safety checks for Resident C, dated 10/5/25 through 10/9/25, indicated the resident was being monitored every 15 minutes for sexually acting out. There was no further documentation in the resident's clinical record pertaining to any behaviors that led to the 15-minute checks being initiated. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 on 10/27/25 at 11:40 a.m., she indicated she was the nurse, on 10/6/25, and Resident C was on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement individualized interventions for a resident with dementia who exhibited behaviors of being sexually inappropriate towards female residents for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident C, Resident B and Resident G). Findings include:A.) The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 10/27/25 at 10:45 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, vascular dementia, depression, anxiety, hypertension, heart failure and epilepsy. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident C, dated 8/22/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. The resident was independent with ambulation. A progress note for Resident C, dated 6/29/25 at 6:12 p.m., indicated the resident was found with his left hand inside a female resident's shirt and had her right breast in his hand and was physically moving his hand around her breast. Writer immediately intervened and separated the residents. Resident C was placed on 15-minute checks. The clinical record of Resident C…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for 3 of 3 rooms observed with peeling and missing paint on the walls. (Resident 10, Resident 12, and Resident 26)Findings include: During an observation of Resident 26's room on 8/21/25 at 12:15 p.m., missing chipped paint was observed all along the wall adjacent to Resident 26's bed. Another observation of Resident 26's room, on 8/25/25 at 1:56 p.m., displayed missing and chipped paint all along the wall adjacent to Resident 26's bed.During an observation of Resident 12's room on 8/21/25 at 12:39 p.m., missing paint was observed on one wall. Another observation of Resident 12's room, on 8/25/25 at 1:57 p.m., displayed missing paint on one wall.During an observation of Resident 10's room on 8/21/25 at 12:40 p.m., missing paint was observed on one wall. Another observation of Resident 10's room, on 8/25/25 at 1:59 p.m., displayed missing paint on one wall.An environmental tour was conducted on 8/26/25 at 11:26 a.m. with the Executive Director (ED) and Director of Maintenance.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were held quarterly for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for care planning. (Resident 1)Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 8/22/25 at 12:51 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus and dementia. The Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated Resident 1 had a care plan meeting, on 8/8/24, and did not have another care plan meeting until 2/6/25. During an interview with the Social Service Director (SSD) on 8/26/25 at 9:56 a.m., she indicated she did not know why Resident 1 did not have a care plan meeting in between the dates of 8/8/24 and 2/6/25. The SSD indicated the memory care social worker who would have been responsible for the meeting was no longer at the facility. The SSD indicated it was social services who were responsible for ensuring care plan meetings were held quarterly for residents. The Care Conferences policy was provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/27/25 at 9:45 a.m. It indicated, .C. The resident/patient,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received showers as preferred for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). (Resident 29)Findings include:The clinical record for Resident 29 was reviewed on 8/22/2025 at 11:43 a.m. The medical diagnosis included traumatic brain injury and anxiety.A Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 7/2025, indicated Resident 29 was cognitively intact, did not reject care, and needed set-up or cleanup assistance for showers. An ADL care plan, revised 07/25/2025, indicated for staff to assist Resident 29 with activities of daily living as needed. A care task, dated 5/26/2025, indicated Resident 29 was to have showers on Wednesday and Saturday evenings, and as needed. Review of the electronic and paper shower documentation for 8/1/2025-8/26/2025 indicated Resident 29 missed a shower on 8/20/2025.Resident council minutes, dated 8/20/2025, indicated Resident 29 had a concern of, .only getting one shower a week.During an interview and observation on 8/21/2025 at 1:49 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were not stored in a medication storage fridge for 1 of 2 medication rooms observed. Findings include: An observation was conducted of the medication storage room on the rehabilitation hallway with Unit Manager (UM) 20 on 8/22/25 at 10:05 a.m. There were four nutritional shakes located in the bottom pull out drawer of the medication storage fridge. UM 20 indicated the facility utilized the bottom drawer of the medication storage fridge for supplements. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing on 8/22/25 at 10:45 a.m. She indicated there was a nourishment fridge meant for supplements and/or food items for the residents. Food items should not be stored in the medication storage fridge. A policy entitled Medication Storage, dated 12/12/23, was provided by the Executive Director on 8/22/25 at 2:17 p.m. The policy indicated ensuring all medications housed on the premises will be stored in the medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a lack of bowel movements, which contributed to not following physician's orders related to PRN (as needed) administration of medications to encourage stooling for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for monitoring of bowel movements. (Resident C) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident C was reviewed on 5-6-25 at 1:30 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia, COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary/lung disease), left femur/hip fracture (4-3-25) and a history of constipation. His most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4-15-25, indicated he was severely cognitively impaired, used a wheelchair for mobility, and was dependent on staff for bed mobility, toileting, bathing, and transfers. It indicated he was not ambulatory. It indicated he had been hospitalized from [DATE] to 4-8-25, related to the recent femur/hip fracture and repair. A review of the progress notes reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain the entry door into the main kitchen resulting in rodents entering the (west) building for 1 of 2 kitchens observed. This had the potential to affect the 42 residents that resided in the west building. Findings include: The resident listing provided by the Administrator on 9/25/24 at 11:00 a.m., indicated there were 42 residents residing in the west building. During an observation and interview with the Dietary Manager on 9/25/24 at 11:05 a.m., there were mice traps set in the west building kitchen and the east kitchen. The Dietary Manager indicated a pest control company came every month and checked the traps. During an observation on 9/25/24 at 12:30 p.m., the west building kitchen door to the outside was shut and did not have a seal around the door. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 on 9/25/24 at 1:28 p.m., indicated she had seen a mouse in Resident H's room in the west building last week and reported it to the Maintenance staff. During an interview with the Pest Control…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 5 of 7 residents reviewed for environment (Resident 18, Resident 1, Resident 75, Resident 38, and Resident 64). Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 7/23/24 at 12:40 p.m., Resident 18's bedroom was bare. The resident had no personal belongings and no pictures. The resident had a broken clock on the wall. During an observation, on 7/25/24 at 10:52 a.m., Resident 18's bedroom was bare. The resident had no personal belongings and no pictures. The resident had a broken clock on the wall. Review of the record of Resident 18, on 7/29/24 at 10:38 a.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, hypertension, major depressive disorder, Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and moderate intellectual disabilities. The plan of care for Resident 18, dated 8/3/22, indicated the resident desired to remain in the facility long term. The interventions included, but were not limited to, encourage resident and family to create a familiar and homelike…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer residents' medication as ordered; notify the physician of a weight gain, as ordered; clarify a resident's medication order; ensure a resident's compression stockings were in place, as ordered; and follow-up on a physician's order for gastrostomy tube removal for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis, 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication, 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema, and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feeding. (Residents 14, 45, 52, and 64) Findings include: 1. The clinical record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 7/26/24 at 2:15 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, end stage renal disease and hypotension. The dialysis care plan indicated he required hemodialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday. He left the facility at 6:00 a.m. and returned around 11:30 a.m. The goal was for him to be free from complications related to dialysis. An intervention was to administer medications, as ordered.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide fresh fluids and keep fluids within reach for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for hydration (Resident 54, Resident 18 and Resident 1). Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 7/24/24 at 11:36 a.m., Resident 54 was lying in bed, the resident had a 1/4 a cup of juice on the bedside table, the table was across the room out of reach of the resident, and the resident did not have any water in his room. During an observation, on 7/25/24 at 10:54 a.m., Resident 54 was lying in bed, the resident had no water or any type of fluids in his room. During an observation, on 7/25/24 at 12:53 p.m., Resident 54 was lying in bed, the resident had no water or any type of fluids in his room. During an observation, on 7/26/24 at 11:47 a.m., Resident 54 was lying in bed, the resident had a Styrofoam cup with ice water in it on the bedside table, the table was across the room and out of the resident's reach. Review of the record of Resident 54, on 7/29/24 at 11:28 a.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide in room self-initiated activities for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities (Resident 1). Finding include: During an observation and interview with Resident 1, on 7/23/24 at 12:44 p.m., they were lying in bed, awake, and staring at the ceiling. Their television was unplugged with no music, books, magazines, puzzles, daily chronicle, or any type of activity was available for the resident. The resident indicated she did not like her room. During an observation and interview with Resident 1, on 7/25/24 at 11:00 a.m., they were lying in bed, awake, and staring at the ceiling. Their television remained unplugged with no music, books, magazines, puzzles, daily chronicle, or any type of activity was available for the resident. The resident indicated she hated her room. The resident indicated she did not necessarily like to do activities with other people. So, she stayed to herself and did her own thing. The resident refused to tell the writer what her favorite activity was. Review of the record of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's urinary catheter drainage bag and/or tubing remained free of contact with the floor for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. (Resident 33) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 33 was reviewed on 7/26/2024 at 11:35 a.m. The medical diagnoses included obstructive uropathy, urinary tract infections, and dysuria. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 5/3/2024, indicated that Resident 33 was mildly cognitively impaired, had an indwelling urinary catheter, and needed extensive assistance of staff for toileting needs. A urinary catheter care plan, revised on 2/23/2023, indicated that Resident 33 was at risk for complications and infection related to utilizing an indwelling catheter for treatment of obstructive uropathy. A physician order, dated 6/11/2024, indicated that Resident 33 utilized an indwelling catheter for obstructive uropathy. An observation of Resident 33, on 7/23/2024 at 2:10 p.m., indicated he was sitting in his wheelchair by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to routinely assess a resident receiving pain medications and administer narcotic pain medication for a resident with chronic pain for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain. (Resident 12) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 12 was reviewed on 7/25/2024 at 1:15 p.m. The medical diagnosis included chronic pain syndrome. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 5/20/2024, indicated that Resident 12 was cognitively intact, received routine and as needed pain medication, and was almost constantly in pain. A pain care plan, revised on 3/8/2024, indicated Resident 12 was at risk for pain related to her chronic pain syndrome. A care planned intervention of administering medications as ordered was dated 5/3/2021. A physician order, dated 7/11/2024, indicated for Resident 12 to receive tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) three times a day routinely for pain. A physician order, dated 5/18/2023, indicated for Resident 12 to receive Tylenol 650 mg by mouth every six hours routinely for pain. During an interview, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0776 — isolated
    Provide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely follow-up on scheduling a resident's appointment for a CT (computerized tomography-diagnostic imaging procedure that uses x-rays and computers to create detailed images of the inside of the body) scan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions. (Resident 52) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 52 was reviewed on 7/26/24 at 2:15 p.m. His diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteoarthritis and end stage renal disease. An observation and interview was conducted with Resident 52 on 7/25/24 at 2:29 p.m. He was lying in bed in his room. He indicated he knew he was supposed to have a CT scan of his back, but the facility never followed up with him on when the appointment would be. The physician's orders indicated a referral for a CT scan of the spine without contrast including cervical, lumbar, and thoracic spine with a local hospital provider, effective 7/10/24. The 7/10/24 order note indicated the following, New order received by NP (nurse practitioner) for a CT scan of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was seen for routine dental services for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for dental services. (Resident 1) Findings include: During an observation and interview with Resident 1, on 7/25/24 at 11:00 a.m., she indicated it was difficult for her to eat because she did not have any teeth. The resident indicated she would like to have dentures. The resident was observed to have no lower or upper teeth. Review of the record of Resident 1, on 7/25/24 at 11:50 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinsonism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, diabetes, atherosclerotic heart disease, major depressive disorder, paranoid personality disorder, and conversion disorder with seizures. The Annual Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident 1, dated 4/4/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. The resident was edentulous (no natural teeth). During an interview with Social Services 1, on 7/26/24 at 11:04 a.m., indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document treatments were completed, or refused, and failed to document if enteral feeding were administered, or refused, for 1 of 23 residents reviewed for documentation (Resident C). Finding include: Review of the record of Resident C, on 7/26/24 at 2:14 p.m., indicated the diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, quadriplegia, dependence on respirator (ventilator) status, neuromuscular dysfunction, tracheotomy and gastrostomy (g-tube) status. During an interview with the Corporate Director of Respiratory, on 7/29/24 at 2:42 p.m., he verified the following treatments were not documented as completed, or refused on the May 2024 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and verified that the enteral g-tube feeding was not documented as provided or refused. The May 2024 TAR for Resident C indicated Dakins (1/2 strength) external solution to left buttock every shift. Apply wound cleanser, Dakins moistened fluffed gauze, and cover with an ABD (abdominal) pad. There was no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide colostomy care in a manner to promote dignity for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for colostomy care (Resident G). Findings include: Review of the clinical record of Resident G on 5/22/24 at 11:55 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, colostomy status, and depression. During an interview with Resident G on 5/21/24 at 3:00 p.m. indicated that 3 to 4 days ago, a nurses aide ran out of the correct fitting nursing supplies during the evening shift and placed a regular clear plastic trash bag over his stoma site and it was not changed with a correct fitting colostomy bag until the following morning. The resident indicated that my dignity was crushed when they did this and it made me feel worthless. During an interview with CNA 7 on 5/22/24 at 12:05 p.m., indicated she was working second shift and Resident G did not have a colostomy bag over his stoma. She indicated that she was told that they had ran out of the colostomy bags and had nothing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a plan of care for a resident who would refuse to wear a pulse oximeter for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident J). The finding include: Review of the clinical record of Resident J on 5/21/24 at 2:45 p.m. indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, dependence on respirator (ventilator) status, and anxiety disorder. The physician Recapulation (recap), dated May 2024, indicated Resident J had order continuous pulse oximeter. During an observation and interview on 5/21/24 at 1:05 p.m., Resident J was lying in bed with no pulse oximeter on or in his room. Resident J indicated he refused to wear his pulse oximeter. During an Interview 5/21/24 at 1:30 p.m. with Respiratory Therapist (RT) 1 indicated that Resident J refused to wear the pulse oximeter. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) 5/22/24 at 12:30 p.m. indicated that it was Social Services responsibility to implement a care plan for Resident J's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an interdisciplinary team review of a post fall event that would include a root cause analysis and implementation of fall interventions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident B) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident B was reviewed on 5/24/24 at 10:47 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, encephalopathy, anemia, hypertension, repeated falls, psychotic disorder, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. A fall care plan, initiated on 7/18/22 and revised on 5/17/24, indicated Resident B was at risk for falls related to history of falls, cognitive deficits, dementia, and use of medications. The interventions added most recently was on 3/28/24 for the following: Bed in lowest position while in bed, Provide reacher, & Bright colored tape to call light on bed. A fall report, dated 5/6/24, indicated the following, .CNA [certified nursing aide] yelled for nurse. upon entering dining room resident was lying on the floor, no injuries noted at this time. Resident helped writer and CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide colostomy services with professional standards when reviewing 1 out of 3 residents for colostomy care (Resident G). The findings include: The clinical record for Resident G reviewed on 5/22/24 at 11:55 a.m., indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but was not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, colostomy status, and depression. The physician Recapulation (recap), dated for May 2024, indicated colostomy care every shift and as needed and to rinse colostomy bag with water after emptying . During an observation on 5/21/24 at 1:52 p.m. with QMA 4, Resident G had a colostomy bag intact with clear tape reinforced around it. During an interview with Resident G on 5/22/24 at 11:32 a.m. the resident indicated that staff used a small trash bag instead of a colostomy bag to cover his stoma. The residient also indicated that he took a picture with his phone of the trash bag over his stoma to provide proof to the facility that the staff had done this. During an interview with CNA 7 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have pulse oximeter (measures oxygenated hemoglobin in the blood and heart rate) in place as ordered by the physician for ventilator residents, failed to ensure Respiratory Therapist was knowledgeable where to locate respiratory supplies, failed to provide education to the resident on the importance of wearing the pulse oximeter and failed to notify the physician of the resident's refusal to wear the pulse oximeter for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident C and Resident J). Findings include: 1.) Review of the record of Resident C on 5/22/24 at 1:40 p.m., indicated the resident's diagnosis included, but were not limited to, chronic respiratory failure with or without hypoxia or hypercapnia, diabetes, acute embolism with chronic kidney disease, anemia, anxiety, paraplegia, dependence on ventilator and tracheotomy status. The May 2024 Recapitulation for Resident C, indicated the resident was ordered to have an continuous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan, for blood pressure medications, for a resident with hypertensive heart disease. This affected 1 of 28 residents reviewed for care plan development. (Resident 21) Findings include: Resident 21's record was reviewed on 2/07/24 at 1:36 p.m. The record indicated Resident 21 had diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, presence of cardiac pacemaker, pulmonary hypertension, and hypertensive heart disease without heart failure. Current physician's orders indicated the resident received the following medications: Amlodipine 10 milligrams by mouth, one time a day, for hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 110, with a start date of 12/11/23. Lisinopril 20 milligrams by mouth, one time a day, for hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, with a start date of 10/16/23. Clonidine 0.1 milligrams by mouth, two times a day, hold for systolic blood pressure less than 150 and/or diastolic blood pressure less than 80, for hypertensive heart disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident and their representative(s) are invited to care plan meetings for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plan meetings. (Resident 40) Findings include: The clinical record of Resident 40 was reviewed on 2-9-24 at 10:10 a.m. It indicated she has been a resident of the facility for over one year. A review of her most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12-12-23, indicated she was cognitively intact. In an interview with Resident 40 on 2-5-24 at 2:33 p.m., she indicated she could not recall being asked to participate in a care plan meeting or previously participating in a care plan meeting and would like to do so. In a review of care plan meeting notes, the clinical record reflected Resident 40 had participated in care plan meetings on 8-10-23, 10-3-23 and 12-11-23, but did not participate or attend a care plan meeting on 9-13-23. A review of the IDT [interdisciplinary team] Care Plan Conference Summary, for 9-13-23, the the form queried if the resident was unable to attend, what other methods…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident had facial hair to their preferences for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. (Resident 28) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 28 was reviewed on 2/8/2024 at 1:45 p.m. The medical diagnosis included muscle weakness. An annual Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 12/23/2023, indicated Resident 28 was moderately cognitively impaired. An interview and observation of Resident 28 on 2/6/2024 at 11:02 a.m. indicated she was in her wheelchair. She has some noticeable facial hair upon her upper lip. She stated she used to be able to take care of it by herself, but she's been needing more help recently and prefers to not have facial hair. An interview with Unit Manager 3 on 2/7/2024 at 1:00 p.m. indicated that Resident 28 needs extensive assistance with activities of daily living and utilizes a mechanical lift for transfers. An observation on 2/9/2024 at 11:35 a.m., indicated Resident 28 was sitting in the dining room with other residents listening to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to administer pain medication according to the physician's orders, for 1 of 3 medication administration pass opportunities. (Resident 41) Findings include: During a medication pass observation, on 2/08/24, at 8:58 a.m., QMA 4 prepared hydrocodone (narcotic pain medication)and acetaminophen 5/325 milligrams (mg), 1 tablet, and 1/2 of a hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5/375 mg tablet and administered the medication to resident 41. The medication as given equaled 7.5 mg of hydrocodone and 487.5 mg of acetaminophen which was 162.5 mg more than the prescribed order for acetaminophen for each medication administration. The physician's order, dated 5/12/23, indicated the following order: Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 7.5-325 MG (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain Resident 41's record was reviewed on 2/12/24 at 11:45 a.m. and indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid factor of multiple sites, fibromyalgia (widespread pain), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions of nonskid strips were in place for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 15) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 15 was reviewed on 2/5/2024 at 1:45 p.m. The medical diagnosis included traumatic brain injury. A fall care plan with an interventions, dated 4/29/2021, indicated Resident 15 was to have nonskid strips in front of his toilet to avoid slippage. An interview and observation on 2/5/2024 at 1:00 p.m., indicated Resident 15 did not have nonskid strips in front of his toilet. He stated in the morning he gets himself out of bed and he feels like the floor is too slick beside his bed and in the bathroom. He stated he is afraid of falling and he is supposed to have those black strips on the floor. An observations on 2/5/2024 at 1:25 p.m. after CNA 2 had left the bathroom in Resident 15's room indicated that Resident 15 did not have nonskid strips in front of his toilet. A policy entitled, Fall Management, was provided by the DON on 2/9/2024 at 10:35 a.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each medication in the medication cart was appropriately labeled, including directions for use, for 1 of 4 medication cart observations. (Resident 31) Findings include: During a medication cart observation of the 300 hall with LPN 3 on 2-12-24 at 10:30 a.m., a Basaglar Pen, of 100 units per milliliter strength, was observed lying in an upper drawer, without a protective bag nor directions for use present. The pen did have the name of Resident 31 present, along with the expiration date, the lot number and a handwritten date of 12-28 on the pen. In an interview with LPN 3 at this time, he indicated he could not locate a bag for this medication which typically has the above information, as well as the specific directions for use. LPN 3 indicated it appeared with the date of 12-28-23 as the open date, the medication should have been discarded due to expiration date of greater than a month. An additional eight (8) pens of the same medication were located in the refrigerator of the 300 hall medication storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Weekly Nursing Summary Assessment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Weekly Nursing Summary Assessment accuracy. (Resident 16) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 16 was reviewed on 2/8/2024 at 1:35 p.m. The medical diagnosis included dementia. An Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 12/23/2023, indicated Resident 16 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident 16's Medication Administration Record for January 2024 indicated Resident 16 received as needed (or PRN) Tylenol for pain on 1/5/2024 and 1/17/2024. A Weekly Nursing Summary Assessment for Resident 16, dated 1/6/2024, indicated Resident 16 did not received any PRN pain medication in the last seven days. A Weekly Nursing Summary Assessment for Resident 16, dated 1/20/2024, indicated Resident 16 did not received any PRN pain medication in the last seven days. A policy entitled, Documentation in the Medical Record, was provided by the DON on 2/9/2024 at 10:35 a.m. The policy indicated, .Each resident's medical record shall contain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment on the 300-hallway due to strong urine odor present near Resident G's room. Findings include: Observations were conducted of the 300-hallway to where there was a urine odor present near and around Resident G's room on the following date(s)/time(s): 8/16/23 at 1:15 p.m., 8/16/23 at 2:39 p.m., 8/17/23 at 9:12 a.m., 8/18/23 at 9:29 a.m., 8/18/23 at 10:16 a.m., & 8/18/23 at 11:42 a.m. An interview conducted with Housekeeping Staff 3, on 8/17/23 at 9:33 a.m., indicated she had worked at the facility for about 4 months. The urine odor comes and goes but she was unsure where it's coming from. She conducted cleaning to all rooms on the 300-hallway daily. She doesn't have any special instructions to clean Resident G's room regarding frequency. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 4, on 8/17/23 at 9:35 a.m., indicated there was a urine odor near Resident G's room. Resident G tends to refuse showers and care. An observation was conducted, on 8/18/23 at 11:42 a.m., to where there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcers were assessed upon admission/readmission to the facility, ensure treatments were initiated timely for identified pressure ulcers, follow-up with recommendations from a wound care provider, and ensure ongoing treatment for pressure ulcers for 2 of 6 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident H and Resident J) Findings include: 1a. The clinical record for Resident H was reviewed on 8/18/23 at 10:27 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis of vertebra, pressure ulcer of sacral region, diabetes mellitus, chronic pain syndrome, and contracture. An admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/10/23, indicated Resident H was cognitively intact along with a stage 2 pressure ulcer, a stage 4 pressure ulcer, and 3 deep tissue injuries documented as noted upon admission to the facility. An impaired skin integrity care plan, revised 8/22/23, indicated Resident H had a stage 3 pressure ulcer to left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to implement the fall interventions for Resident K for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: The clinical record for Resident K was reviewed on 8/22/2023 at 3:35 p.m. The medical diagnoses included bipolar disorder and acquired absence of the left and right leg. A Quarterly minimum data set assessment, dated for 6/20/2023, indicated Resident K was cognitively intact. A fall risk assessment, dated for 11/14/2022, indicated Resident K was a high risk for falls. A nursing progress note, dated for 3/9/2023, indicated Resident K had attempted to self-transfer back to bed, resulting in a fall. An intradisciplinary team note, dated for 3/16/2023, indicated the team reviewed Resident K's fall from 3/9/2023 and would implement an intervention of assisting Resident K back to bed after smoke breaks. During an interview with Resident K on 8/21/2023 at 1:29 p.m., she indicated staff does not always offer to assist her back to bed after smoking. During an interview with CNA 8 on 8/22/2023 at 1:45 p.m., she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-9.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.0M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 5%Other / private 24%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$396per resident / day
operating cost
$12,024per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$362per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155491. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next