Richland Bean Blossom Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 74 beds and averages 55.2 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-04-10 · tag F0851 — widespread
  Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) for 22 days out of a quarter (Fiscal Year Quarter 1). Findings include: On 4/6/26 at 10:45 a.m., the facility's Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) was reviewed.The CASPER report indicated the following:- The facility failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day on 10/4/25; 10/18/25; 10/19/25; 10/25/25; 10/26/25; 11/1/25; 11/2/25; 11/8/25; 11/9/25; 11/15/25; 11/16/25; 11/23/25; 11/29/25; 11/30/25; 12/6/25; 12/7/25; 12/13/25; 12/14/25; 12/20/25; 12/21/25; 12/27/25; 12/28/25.- The facility had low weekend staffing.- The facility had a 1 start staffing rating. A review of the staffing sheets from the quarter indicated the facility was fully staffed and had licensed nurse on all of the days listed above. During an interview on 4/9/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-10 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the written notifications required for a transfer/discharge and bed hold policy was provided to the resident and/or the resident representative for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for discharge and hospitalization. (Resident 2, Resident 7, Resident 27 and Resident 53).Findings include: 1. On 4/7/26 at 9:38 a.m., Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, generalized anxiety disorder (a mental health condition characterized by excessive, uncontrollable worry about everyday things, lasting at least six months), major depressive disorder (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities). Resident 27's progress notes indicated the following: - On 12/9/25 at 10:35 p.m., the resident complained chest pain, lower back pain, and shortness of breath. 911 was called and the resident was transported to the hospital. - On 12/15/25, time unknown, the resident returned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff electronically transmitted the MDS (Minimum Data Set) data to the CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid) System within 14 days of completion for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for transmittal data. (Resident 36)Findings include:On 4/9/26 at 10:06 a.m., Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed. An Annual MDS assessment, dated 2/23/26, indicated it was over 120 days past due for submission to CMS.During an interview on 4/10/26 at 11:22 a.m., the MDS coordinator indicated she had 2 care area assessments left to complete on the annual MDS assessment, she had just completed them and had submitted the MDS to CMS.During an interview on 4/10/26 at 12:05 p.m., the Administrator indicated the facility did not have a policy in regard to MDS transmissions.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment accurately reflected a resident's status for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident 4, Resident 27)Findings include: 1. On 4/9/26 at 10:07 a.m., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, bipolar disorder and anxiety. An Annual MDS assessment, dated 3/11/26, indicated the resident was not currently considered by the state Level II PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or related condition. A Level II PASARR was completed on March 31, 2023. During an interview on 4/10/26 at 11:10 a.m., the MDS coordinator indicated she corrected the resident's MDS assessment to accurately reflect the PASARR Level II information. During an interview on 4/10/26 at 12:05 p.m., the Administrator indicated the facility did not have a policy in regard to MDS assessment coding, but followed the RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) manual. 2. On 4/9/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic pain medication was reconciled when it was delivered from the pharmacy. (Resident B) Findings include:During an interview on 12/9/25 at 8:23 a.m., the Administrator indicated, on 9/23/25, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 reported that she was not able to locate Resident B's oxycodone-acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 7.5 milligrams (mg)-325 mg. When LPN 1 called the pharmacy, she was told that 30 oxycodone-acetaminophen 7.5-325 mg tablets had been delivered for Resident B on 9/21/25. LPN 2 had signed the delivery slip for the controlled medications that night but did not follow the proper procedure for reconciling the controlled medications that had been delivered with what was listed on the delivery slip before she signed for them. LPN 2 did not reconcile the narcotic medications she placed in the locked drawer on the medication cart with the narcotic disposition record. The oxycodone-acetaminophen 7.5-325mg that was delivered, on 9/21/25, was never located. LPN 2's employment had been terminated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly respond to grievances from the resident council meetings for 5 of 5 residents interviewed. (Resident 11, Resident 31, Resident 55, Resident 45, Resident 41) Findings include: During a resident council meeting on 5/7/25 at 10:01 a.m., Resident 11, Resident 31, Resident 55, Resident 45, and Resident 41, indicated if a meal included a wet item, such as corn, their bread was often soggy and unappetizing. The resident's indicated they had told staff this was a problem multiple times and it was an ongoing problem. A review of the resident council meeting minutes indicated the following: - On 12/26/24, the residents indicated they would like separate dishware for liquid type foods, such as, cottage cheese, fruit, baked beans, etc. - On 2/27/25, the residents discussed the need of bowls for liquid foods. - On 3/27/25, the residents indicated when liquid foods were on the plate with regular food, the sandwiches, or breads would get soggy. On 5/7/25 at 12:10 p.m., a test tray was obtained from the 300 hall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program for 13 of 13 residents who resided on the secure dementia unit. Findings include: On the following dates and times, residents of the secured dementia unit were observed walking in the hallway, and sitting in the dining area and common area with no structured activities taking place: - On 5/5/25 from 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and from 2:00 p.m. to 3:05 p.m. - On 5/6/25 from 9:40 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. and from 1:40 p.m. to 2:55 p.m. - On 5/7/25 from 9:45 a.m. to 11:55 a.m. and from 1:20 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. - On 5/8/25 from 9:30 a.m. to 11:05 a.m. No activities schedule was observed posted or located on the closed dementia unit. During confidential interviews during the course of the survey, they indicated there had been no activities calendar or schedule posted on the unit for several months, and no scheduled activities had taken place for several months, including the survey period. On occasion, an activities assistant would come to the unit to do unscheduled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff on the secured dementia unit for 13 of 13 residents who resided on the secure dementia unit (Resident 13, Resident 15, Resident 19, Resident 23, Resident 34, Resident 53, Resident 32, Resident 14, Resident 52, Resident 8, Resident 54, Resident 208, and Resident 48). Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 2:10 p.m., LPN 1 was observed attending to Resident 34 who was ambulating in an unsteady manner in the hallway. LPN 1 observed Resident 52 ambulating in an unsteady manner farther down the hallway and instructed Resident 34 to hold to the hallway railing in order to attend to Resident 52. During this time, QMA 1 was assisting a resident in a resident bathroom. CNA 1 was in the shower room with another resident. LPN 1 guided Resident 52 to a chair in the common area and returned to assist Resident 34. On 5/7/25 at 1:30 p.m. LPN 1 was observed assisting Resident 34 to a chair in the common area. CNA 1 was assisting a resident in a resident room. Resident 34 was resistant to sitting and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff served food that had a palatable texture and appearance for 1 of 1 test trays observed. (Resident 11, Resident 31, Resident 55, Resident 45, Resident 41, Resident 17) Findings include: During a resident council meeting on 5/7/25 at 10:01 a.m., Resident 11, Resident 31, Resident 55, Resident 45, and Resident 41, indicated if a meal included a wet item, such as corn, their bread was often soggy and unappetizing. They indicated they had told staff this was a problem multiple times and it was an ongoing problem. On 5/7/25 at 12:10 p.m., a test tray was obtained from the 300 hall cart. The meal included a hamburger on a bun, fried onion rings, and whole kernel corn on a flat plate. The corn was beneath the bun and a few onion rings were on top of the corn. The bottom of the hamburger bun and the onion rings placed on top of the corn were soggy. During an interview on 5/7/25 at 12:15 p.m., the Administrator did not deny the hamburger bun was soggy. During an interview on 5/7/25 at 12:20 p.m., Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-09 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representative were provided informed consent prior to initiating an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 13) Findings include: On 5/6/25 at 2:09 p.m., Resident 13's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, myotonic muscular dystrophy (a genetic disorder characterized by progressive muscle weakness and difficulty relaxing muscles after use), psychosis (significant loss of contact with reality, often characterized by hallucinations and delusions), and senile degeneration of the brain (a decline in cognitive function). A review of physician's orders indicated the following: On 4/29/25, an order for Olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication) 2.5 mg (milligrams) once daily was prescribed for a diagnosis of psychosis. A review of Resident 13's progress notes indicated the following: On 4/29/25, the resident informed staff that she saw an accident take place that had multiple casualties. The resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $613K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN