Elwood Health And Living

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 72.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 61.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.24 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.13 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-03-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from misappropriation of property for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for drug diversion. (Residents B, C, and D) Findings include:During an interview, on 3/10/26 at 10:00 a.m., the DON and Administrator indicated they had been called early in the morning about an unusual occurrence with a shift-to-shift narcotic count. The count had been off by one pill from when the original count was done. LPN 13 indicated she thought she left a pill in a cup in the medication room. She went into the medication room and brought out a pill in a cup. The Administrator and DON had reviewed the camera footage and saw LPN 13 take a pill out of her bag that was in the medication room, place the pill in a med cup, then leave the medication room. During review of camera footage, on 3/10/26 at 12:22 p.m., the DON showed a clip of LPN 13 entering the medication room, getting into her personal backpack, and pulling out a plastic bag of pills. She removed a pill from the bag. She then opened a new…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide accommodations to support a resident's ability to reposition in bed for comfort and safety and to have access to physician ordered respiratory supplies according to their plan of care 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. (Resident 62) Findings include:During an observation, on 3/5/26 at 11:50 a.m., a sign hung on Resident 62's wall. The sign indicated Resident 62 was to only receive nectar thickened liquids when she was in an upright position, no straws, small sips were to be taken, the head of the bed was to be elevated to 90 degrees, and the resident was to be kept up for 30 minutes after meals. Resident 62 was lying on her back in her bed. The head of the bed was not elevated. A white foam cup, dated 3/5/26, with a lid and straw, sat on a bedside table that was positioned across the mid-section of Resident 62. A continuous pressure airway machine (CPAP, a machine to help breathing) sat on a nightstand at the head of the bed. No CPAP mask was present. Resident 62 indicated she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of physical abuse was reported to the State Agency for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident 5)Resident 5's clinical record was reviewed on 3/10/26 at 8:59 a.m. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis) following a cerebral infarction affecting the right dominant side.A progress note, dated 2/15/26 at 3:11 p.m., indicated Resident 5 called for the nurse to come to her room. The resident stated someone was really rough when changing her and her wrist got slammed on the wall. The nurse asked the resident what time it happened and Resident 5 stated it happened overnight. The aides were not paying attention and were in a rush. The resident's wrist was assessed and no redness or swelling were noted. The resident continued to complain of pain in the right wrist.A progress note, dated 2/15/26 at 3:14 p.m., indicated a new order for a right wrist x-ray.An acute care note, dated 2/16/26 at 3:55 p.m., indicated Resident 5 was seen for an acute visit for wrist pain. The resident reported…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision and develop and implement interventions to prevent recurrent falls for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 7 and Resident 6). Findings include: 1.During an observation, on 3/5/26 at 3:03 p.m., Resident 7 walked up and down the unit's hallway. Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed on 3/9/26 at 9:36 a.m. Diagnoses included difficulty walking, low back pain, unspecified dementia, severe, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region without mention of lumbar back pain or lower extremity pain, restless leg syndrome (RLS), and hypertension. Current orders included donepezil (for dementia) 10 mg daily at bedtime (8/9/23), memantine extended release (for dementia) 28 mg daily (7/5/23), acetaminophen 1000 mg daily for pain (2/6/26), activity level: up ad lib (6/8/21), apply gripper socks at bedtime to prevent falls…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the narcotic shift to shift count was completed for 4 of 5 medication carts reviewed. Findings include::During a medication cart observation, on 3/5/26 at 11:07 a.m., the 200-hall back medication cart Narcotic Shift to Shift Count Record was missing signatures on 3/2/26 at 6 p.m. for the oncoming nurse, on 3/3/26 at 6 a.m. for the off going nurse, on 3/3/26 at 10 p.m. for the oncoming nurse, on 3/4/26 at 6 a.m. for the off going nurse, and on 3/5/26 at 9 a.m. for the oncoming nurse. The 200-hall front medication cart was missing signatures on 2/15/26 at 6 a.m. for the oncoming nurse, on 2/15/26 at 2 p.m. for the oncoming nurse, on 2/15/26 at 6 p.m. for the off going nurse, 2/15/26 at 6 p.m., for the oncoming nurse, 2/15/26 at 10 p.m. for the off going nurse, on 2/26/26 at 6 a.m. for the oncoming nurse, on 3/3/26 at 6 a.m. for the off going nurse, 3/3/26 at 10 p.m. for the oncoming nurse, and on 3/3/26 at no time listed for the off going nurse. During the observation, RN 14 indicated the Narcotic Shift to Shift Count…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure it was free of a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 22 and 27) observed during the medication pass. There were 29 opportunities for error observed with 2 medication errors, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.9 percent. Findings include: 1. During a medication administration observation, on 3/10/26 at 8:42 a.m., LPN 6 prepared Resident 27's medications. She knocked on the door and took the prepared pills into the resident's room along with an 8 ounce of cup of water mixed with 17 grams of polyethylene glycol 3350 (laxative). The resident drank about four ounces of the medicated water mix. LPN 6 left the remainder of the medicated water mix on the resident's table. During an interview, on 3/10/26 at 8:57 a.m., LPN 6 indicated she left the of polyethylene glycol 3350 water mix with the resident to sip on. She would go back and check on the resident later. Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed on 3/11/26 at 9:37 a.m. Diagnoses included constipation,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a manner to prevent loose pills in the medication cart drawers for 2 of 3 medication carts reviewed out of 5 facility medication storage carts. (200 hall and 300 hall)Findings include: During a medication cart observation on 3/5/26 at 11:07 a.m., accompanied by RN 14, a blue oblong pill inscribed with A-17 was found loose in the second drawer on the left side of the 200-hallway medication cart. RN 14 indicated that the pill should be destroyed in a drug buster (a drug disposal system). The medication carts were cleaned out weekly. During a medication cart observation on 3/5/26 at 12:19 p.m., accompanied by LPN 5, the following loose pills/capsules were observed in the third drawer from the top of the 300 hallway medication cart: one peach colored capsule inscribed with 215, a pink round pill inscribed with 262, a white round pill inscribed with HP 23, a green oblong pill inscribed with E 45, a pink and orange pill inscribed with EP 102, a white round pill inscribed with L 150, and a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive tableware for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for assistive devices used during dining. (Resident 16) Finding includes:During a dining observation, on 3/6/26 at 12:43 p.m., Resident 16's meal was provided in the dining room on a white plate.During a dining observation, on 3/10/26 at 12:57 p.m., Resident 16's meal was provided in the dining room on a white plate. During an interview, on 3/10/26 at 1:30 p.m., LPN 5 indicated Resident 16 often fed himself but needed increased cuing and staff assistance during the lunch and supper meals. Resident 16 did not use specialty cups, plates, or utensils during meals.Resident 16's clinical record was reviewed on 3/10/26 at 3:45 p.m. Diagnoses included need for assistance for personal care, dysphagia at the oropharyngeal stage (difficulty initiating to swallow), lack of coordination, and dry eye syndrome.Current orders included regular diet with regular texture, thin liquids, and a red plate at meals (2/26/26).An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  A.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize infection prevention and control strategies related to handling of a urinary drainage bag for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for indwelling catheters. (Resident 65)B. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were implemented during perineal care and wound care for a resident with a feeding tube for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for wound care. (Resident 56) Finding includes:A.During an observation, on 3/6/26 at 10:45 a.m., Resident 65's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag hung under his wheelchair. The bag touched the floor. The bag drug on the floor as Resident 65 self-propelled his wheelchair in the hallway. During an observation, on 3/6/26 at 12:13 p.m., Resident 65's urinary catheter drainage bag drug on the floor as Resident 65 self-propelled his wheelchair in the hallway. During an observation, on 3/9/26 at 10:45 a.m., Resident 65's urinary catheter drainage bag drug on the floor as Resident 65 self-propelled his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for a cognitively impaired resident residing on the secured unit resulting in the resident (Resident B) leaving the secured unit twice without supervision.Findings include:Resident B's clinical record was reviewed on 10/27/25 at 10:59 a.m. Diagnoses included anxiety, depression, vascular dementia with behaviors, and stage 3 chronic kidney disease. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A current quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 8/30/25, indicated the resident had no current behaviors and was able to ambulate independently and was severely cognitively impaired.A care plan related to elopement risk, dated 3/22/21, indicated the resident demonstrated exit seeking behaviors. Interventions included escorting the resident outside and use of distractions. A care plan related to exit seeking behaviors, dated 6/8/21, indicated the resident may shake and push/fidget with doors in an attempt to leave the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 98 rows in the source record cover these 61 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $423K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN