No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bethel Manor

6015 Kratzville Rd, Evansville, IN 47710 · Government - County · 75 certified beds · (812) 425-8182 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (812) 425-8182 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jul 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4498 N 1st Ave · (812) 436-7280 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4701 N 1st Ave · (812) 464-3656 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6209 Springfield Dr
Park
6101 N 1st Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.6%11.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.5%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.3%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.0%11.9%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.1%23.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.3%3.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.2%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.8%13.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission17.6%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.9%10.8%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.231.611.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.571.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 120 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
38.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 38.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.8%CMS range 52.2–69.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.3–13.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge38.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge24.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.3%CMS range 4.9–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.18
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.31
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
46.4%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 55.8 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.31 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.53 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-22)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents privacy. Staff did not knock on resident doors before entering to deliver meal trays. (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER]) Finding includes: The following was observed during the delivery of meal trays at supper on 3/12/26:At 5:06 p.m., CNA 3 was observed to enter room [ROOM NUMBER] with a meal tray without knocking or announcing himself. At 5:07 p.m., CNA 2 was observed to enter room [ROOM NUMBER] with a meal tray without knocking or announcing herself. At 5:10 p.m., CNA 2 was observed to enter room [ROOM NUMBER] with a meal tray without knocking or announcing herself. At 5:11 p.m., CNA 3 was observed to enter room [ROOM NUMBER] and deliver a meal tray without knocking or announcing himself. At 5:12 p.m., CNA 2 was observed to enter room [ROOM NUMBER] and deliver a meal tray without knocking or announcing herself.At 5:13 p.m., CNA 3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions during 3 of 3 kitchen observations. Food was not labeled correctly, expired food was not disposed of, hairnets were not worn properly, and staff placed their fingers in their mouth during food service. (Main Kitchen, Cottage Kitchen, Dietary [NAME] 9)Findings include: 1. On 8/19/25 at 8:55 A.M., the following was observed during the initial tour of the Main Kitchen:In large reach-in refrigerator:1 gallon jug of coleslaw, dated 7/2 with a best by date of 6/5/25.On the spice rack at the preparation table:2 bottles of chili pepper with no open date1 bottle of lemon pepper with no open date1 bottle of sage with no open date1 bottle of pepper with no open date1 bottle of nutmeg with no open date1 bottle of cinnamon with no open date1 bottle of ginger with no open date1 jar black pepper with no lid or openIn the dry storage area:bag of chips with no open date1 bag of sprinkles with no open date1 bottle of oregano with no open date1 bottle of white vinegar, best by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a plan of care related to recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), or medication used to treat recurrent UTIs, for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for UTIs. (Resident 3) Finding includes:On 8/20/25 at 1:06 P.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease. The most recent Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/27/25, indicated Resident 3's cognition was too low to be assessed, and that Resident 3 was dependent on staff (staff does all of the work) for eating, toileting, bathing, and transfers. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: D-Mannose Oral Capsule 500 MG (milligrams) Give one capsule by mouth one time a day for UTI prevention, Start date 8/9/25 Laboratory results indicated Resident 3 had positive urinary tract infection cultures on 10/17/24, 7/24/25, 8/7/25. A nursing progress note, dated 8/20/25 at 12:56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised after a fall for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for falls. (Resident 7, Resident 54, Resident 3)Findings include:1. On 8/21/25 at 8:39 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The most current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 8/5/25, indicated Resident 7 was not assessed for cognitive impairment due to being rarely or never understood, was independent for transfers and required supervision of staff for toileting, and had no falls since the prior assessment. A care plan conference was completed on 7/29/25. Notes indicated to continue with the current plan of care. A current risk for falls care plan, revised on 6/25/25, indicated Resident 7 had a history of falls with multiple risk factors. A nursing progress note, dated 4/14/25 at 3:44 P.M., indicated Resident 7 sustained a witnessed fall while pacing the hallway faster than her usual pace. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was correctly prepared during 1 of 1 observation of puree altered diet preparation. (Dietary [NAME] 9)Finding includes: On 8/19/25 at 12:07 P.M., Dietary [NAME] 9 was observed preparing one serving of pureed meat loaf. Dietary [NAME] 9 added the following ingredients to the blender:1 slice of meat loaf unknown amount of milk The recipe for Meatloaf Pureed Thick was reviewed. Ingredients for 20 servings included:5 pounds and 12 ounces meatloaf2 and 5/8 teaspoon beef base2 3/4 cup hot water1/3 cup and 2/3 teaspoon food thickener During an interview on 8/19/25 at 12:10 P.M., Dietary [NAME] 9 indicated she should follow the recipe instead of using milk. On 8/22/25 at 10:56 A.M., the Administrator provided a current Puree Recipe policy, dated 3/26/25, that indicated .all pureed items will be prepared using facility-approved, standardized recipes . 3.1-21(a)(3)

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were performed during 2 of 2 random observations. Staff did not use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for a resident on Enhanced Barrier Protection (EBP) and did not clean blood pressure equipment between residents. (Resident 2, Resident 63, and Resident 64)Findings include: 1. On 8/19/25 at 11: 52 A.M., during a random observation of care for Resident 2, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 3 was observed transferring Resident 2 from the bed to a Broda chair without wearing a gown. An Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) sign was observed on the resident's door. On 8/22/25 at 8:22 A.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's Disease and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition. The most current Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 8/19/25, indicated Resident 2 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 2 was dependent on staff for eating, transferring, hygiene, and dressing. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served in a sanitary manner in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 2 of 2 observations of the kitchen. Floors and equipment were soiled. (Kitchen) On 3/4/25 at 9:30 a.m., the kitchen was observed to have the following: 1. The burners on the stove had grease and food build up. 2. Debris was observed on the floor under the two and three compartment sinks, under the racks that held the pots and pans, under stainless steel prep tables, in the dishwasher area, around the hot water heater, under the stove and steam table. 3. The hot water heater had dirt/dust on the top of heater and on the pipes. 4. Five food carts had debris on the surfaces. 5. The side of the steamer unit had debris. The same was observed on 3/5/25 at 11:05 a.m. On 3/5/25 at 11:07 a.m. Dietary Aide 2 indicated night staff are supposed to sweep and mop the floors, including under equipment, all staff have a schedule for what is supposed to be cleaned. On 3/5/25 at 12:01 p.m., the Dietary Manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents requiring assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received adequate assistance with showering/bathing for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for dependent ADL care. (Resident 28, Resident 37, Resident 57, Resident 6) Findings include: On 7/23/24 at 3:10 P.M., multiple Resident's attending the Resident Council meeting voiced concern of not receiving routine showers and/or complete bed baths as scheduled. 1. On 7/23/24 at 10:12 A.M. Resident 28's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease and polyosteoarthritis. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/8/24, indicated Resident 28 was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance from staff for toileting, bathing, and transfers. A self-care deficit care plan, dated 3/26/18, indicated Resident 28 had need for assistance with personal care and should receive a shower twice weekly and partial bath all other days. The Point of Care (POC) (a Certified Nurse Aide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion or mobility received services to maintain or improve mobility for 4 of 4 residents reviewed for restorative therapy. (Resident 6, Resident 28, Resident 52, Resident 55) Findings include: 1. On 7/23/24 at 10:12 A.M. Resident 28's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease and polyosteoarthritis. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/8/24, indicated Resident 28 was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance from staff for toileting, bathing, and transfers. Current care plans included, but were not limited to: Resident requires RNP (Restorative Nursing Program) of ROM (Range of Motion), Date initiated 11/2/22. Resident to perform BLE (bilateral lower extremities) exercises throughout all planes x 20 reps or on cubii pedaler on Level 1 for 15 minutes 3-4x/week, Date initiated: 11/9/23. Resident to perform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dishwasher temperatures and chemicals were within range and logs were completed for 1 of 2 kitchens observed. (Cottage kitchen) Findings include: 1. On 7/21/24 at 10:14 A.M. during an initial kitchen tour of the Cottage, Dietary Aide 40 indicated the dishwasher was a high temperature dishwasher, but she was unsure what the temperature was supposed to be when the machine was running. She indicated there was water on the floor when she came in that morning so she was not certain if the machine was functioning properly and would call maintenance to look at it. At that time, Dietary Aide 40 provided the dishwasher temperature logs for June and July. Sixty-Four of 90 opportunities for wash and rinse temperature testing were not filled out in June. Fifty-one of 61 opportunities for wash and rinse temperature testing were not filled out in July. Dietary Aide 40 indicated she was supposed to fill out the temperature logs at the end of her shift. On 7/22/24 at 9:45 A.M., Dietary Aide [NAME] 10 indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for transmission based precautions, and failed to position fans to prevent cross contamination in the laundry processing area for 1 of 2 random observations of the laundry room. (Resident 57, Resident 60, Resident 17, and Laundry Room) Findings include: 1. On 7/23/24 at 7:57 A.M., a PPE (personal protective equipment) cart was observed outside of Resident 57's room. There was no sign observed indicating instructions for specific use of the PPE or to see the nurse before entering the room. On 7/23/24 at 8:00 A.M., Resident 57's clinical record was reviewed. The clinical record lacked orders, care plans, and progress notes related to transmission based precautions. On 7/23/24 at 8:15 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 23 indicated that Resident 57 was on EBP because he had a feeding tube. 2. On 7/23/24 at 8:15 A.M., LPN 23 indicated Resident 60 was on EBP because he had an indwelling urinary catheter. At that time, she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents that were self administering medications were assessed for capability to self administer medications for 2 of 2 residents observed with medications at bedside (Resident 49, Resident 23) Finding include: 1. On 7/21/24 at 10:16 A.M., Desitin was observed be to be on Resident 49's bedside table with Resident's name and physician noted on the label. On 7/21/24 11:10 A.M., Resident 49's clinical record reviewed. Diagnosis included, but not limited to, Alzheimer's disease with late onset. The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that Resident 49 is severely cognitively impaired, required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, substantial or maximal assistance with bathing, and substantial or maximal assistance with bed mobility. The clinical record lacked any self-administration of medication assessment or care plans. Physician orders included but were not limited to Desitin External Paste 40 % Zinc…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident privacy for 2 of 2 random observations. Resident information was left visible on a computer screen during medication administration. (Resident 13, Resident 16) Finding includes: 1. On 7/24/24 at 10:00 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 was observed gathering medications at a medication cart. When LPN 5 walked away from the medication cart and down the hall, the computer screen was left up with Resident 13's information visible (picture, name, date of birth , and medication list). LPN 5 came back to the cart at 10:04 A.M., and promptly left the cart again to enter a resident's room. At 10:06 A.M., Resident 3 was observed walking by the medication cart. LPN 5 returned to the cart at 10:06 A.M. 2. On 7/24/24 at 11:17 A.M., the medication cart was observed sitting between the nurses station and elevator with the computer screen open and Resident 16's information visible. LPN 5 was observed at that time in the Dining Room with a resident. At 11:19 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 3 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's rights to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 1 residents reviewed. Resident 36 was hit by CNA(Certified Nurse Aide) while receiving care resulting in laceration above the left eye. (Resident 36) Findings include: On 7/22/24 at 10:28 A.M., Resident 36 was observed in a chair smiling. On 7/22/24 at 1:21 P.M., Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE and Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. The current Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 36 was severely cognitively impaired. The resident was dependent on transfer, toileting, and dressing. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Lexapro Tablet 10 MG (Milligrams) (Escitalopram Oxalate)(Antidepressant medication). Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression/anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary care and services upon admission for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for skin impairment. A resident who was admitted with skin impairment did not have treatment orders put in place upon admission. (Resident 101) Finding includes: On 9/4/24 at 11:09 A.M., Resident 101's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified intracapsular fracture of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, chronic kidney disease, stage 4, (severe), type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. An admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 9/3/24, was still in progress and indicated Resident 101's cognition was moderately impaired. Care plans included, but were not limited to: Resident has actual impairment to skin integrity AEB (as evidenced by) diabetic ulcer to left 2nd toe and diabetic ulcer to left heel, and shearing to sacrum r/t (related to)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure person-centered care plans were developed and implemented for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and behaviors. (Resident 37, Resident 49) Finding includes: 1. On 7/23/24 at 1:59 P.M., Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease and anxiety. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/4/24, indicated Resident 37 was severely cognitively impaired, required substantial assistance from staff for toileting and bathing, and was receiving antianxiety, antidepressant, diuretic, antiplatelet, and hypoglycemic medications. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Lexapro (antidepressant medication) 10 mg (milligram) Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime, start date 12/8/23. Ativan (antianxiety medication) 0.5 mg (Lorazepam) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day, start date 4/12/24. Lasix (diuretic medication) 20 mg Give 1 tablet by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. A resident was given the wrong medication resulting in rebound congestion when the medication was discontinued. (Resident 56) Finding includes: On 7/23/24 at 9:23 A.M., Resident 56's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, anxiety, depression, and psychotic disorder. The most recent admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 5/6/24, indicated no cognitive impairment and no behaviors. Resident 56 required supervision with bed mobility, eating, transfers, and toileting. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Nasal spray nasal solution 0.05% (Oxymetazoline HCl) 2 sprays in both nostrils two times a day for allergies, dated 6/3/24 through 7/1/24. (medication if used more than 3 days may cause rebound congestion) Saline nasal solution 0.65% (Saline) 2 sprays in both nostrils four times a day for nasal congestion for 5 days, dated 7/3/24. A Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prevention of pressure ulcers for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injury. Interventions were not followed, and wound assessments were not completed as ordered. (Resident 54, Resident 55) Findings include: 1. On 7/21/24 at 12:42 P.M., Resident 54 was observed lying in bed on her back. When the resident was rolled to the left side, there was no dressing observed covering the pressure area on her sacrum. At that time, the area was observed slightly open in the middle revealing subcutaneous tissue, and the area surrounding the pressure injury was observed a dark pink color indicative of a deeper wound under the skin. No drainage was observed. Granulation tissue (healing connective tissue in the wound bed) was observed in the middle of the wound. At that time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 21 did not indicate anything about a missing dressing. On 7/22/24 at 1:24 P.M., Resident 54 was observed lying on her back with the head of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for falls. Interventions were not updated following falls. (Resident 52, Resident 28, Resident 11 Findings include: 1. On 7/21/24 at 9:43 A.M., Resident 52 indicated she had fallen about a month ago when she lost her footing. At that time, Resident 52 was sitting in a recliner with her walker in front of her. On 7/23/24 at 11:42 A.M., Resident 52's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but were not limited to, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 6/18/24, indicated no cognitive impairment, and no behaviors. Resident 52 required supervision assistance of one staff with transfers. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Up with walker and staff assist and non skid shoes, dated 1/4/24. A current risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was properly labeled and oxygen services were provided according to physician order for 1 of 1 reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 24) Findings include: On 7/21/21 9:14 A.M., Resident 24 was observed sitting in recliner with nasal cannula in nostrils. The tubing was connected to an oxygen concentrator with a date of 6/30/24 written on the side of the tubing. There was also no oxygen warning sign on the outside of the door. On 7/22/24 at 9:40 A.M., Resident 24's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy. The current Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident was mildly cognitively impaired. The resident needed partial assistance with toileting and dressing and was wearing O2 (Oxygen). Current physician orders included but were not limited to:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper interventions were in place for monitoring symptom, side effects, and behaviors of medications for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dementia. (Resident 46, Resident 37) Findings include: 1. On 7/23/24 at 4:09 P.M., Resident 46's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, mood disturbance and anxiety disorder. The current Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident 46 was significantly cognitively impaired. Resident 46 was dependent for bathing, dressing, and toileting. MDS indicated the resident has a diagnosis of No Alzheimer dementia. Current physician orders included but were not limited to: Seroquel Oral Tablet 25 MG (Milligrams) (Quetiapine Fumarate).Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for dementia with mood disturbance related to unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with mood disturbance dated 4/15/24. Xanax Oral Tablet 0.25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine medications were available and dispensed according to physician's orders for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. (Resident 28) Finding includes: On 7/23/24 at 10:08 A.M., Resident 28's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, hyperlipidemia. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/8/24, indicated Resident 28 had severe cognitive impairment and required setup assistance of staff for eating. Current physician orders included, but was not limited to: Pravachol (a medication to treat high cholesterol) Tablet 80 MG (milligrams) - Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hyperlipidemia, dated 7/17/22. The July 2024 MAR (Medication Administration Record) indicated resident did not receive the medication on 7/18, 7/19, and 7/22 because it was on order. The MAR indicated the resident received the medication on 7/20 and 7/21. On 7/23/24 at 10:18 A.M., the pharmacy indicated Resident 28's Pravachol was reordered early the morning of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospice. A resident's as needed anti-anxiety medication was ordered for more than 14 days. (Resident 49) Finding includes: On 7/21/24 at 11:10 A.M., Resident 49's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease with late onset and Anxiety Disorder . The MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/6/24 indicated that Resident 49's cognition was severely impaired and was currently receiving hospice services. Current physician orders included but were not limited to lorazepam oral tablet 0.5 MG, 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for anxiety and agitation related to Anxiety Disorder. The order was dated 6/28/24 with no end date. On 07/25/24 at 10:53 A.M. the DON (Director of Nursing) indicated that PRN antianxiety medications should have been evaluated every 14 days, also that it would have been expected for the end date to be 14 days when order was put in. A Use of Psychotropic Medication Policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders and professional standards for 2 of 26 opportunities, resulting in a medication administration error rate of 7.69%. (Resident 53 and Resident 23) Findings include: 1. On 7/23/24 at 11:35 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 46 was observed preparing a Humalog Kwikpen for insulin administration for Resident 53. An AccuCheck (blood glucose test) indicated the resident had a blood sugar of 313. LPN 46 indicated the resident received sliding scale insulin and was to receive 3 units of insulin Lispro (a fast acting insulin) for a blood glucose reading of 313. LPN 46 set the insulin pen to 3 units. She cleaned the tip of the pen, attached the needle, and administered 3 units of insulin to Resident 53 in her lower left abdomen. LPN 46 did not prime the insulin pen before administration of the medication. 2. On 7/24/24 at 12:02 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 7 was observed preparing a Humalog Kwikpen (Lispro Insulin) for insulin administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-26 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent before administering influenza vaccines for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident 37 and Resident 36) Findings include: 1. On 7/22/24 at 2:00 P.M., Resident 37's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 37 received the influenza vaccine on 10/20/23. The clinical record lacked a signed consent for the influenza vaccination received on 10/20/23. On 7/23/24 at 1:27 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided the most current influenza vaccination consent form signed by Resident 37 dated 4/26/21. 2. On 7/22/24 at 1:45 P.M., Resident 36's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 36 received the influenza vaccine on 10/11/23. The clinical record lacked a signed consent for the influenza vaccination received on 10/11/23. On 7/23/24 at 10:43 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 indicated that it took too long to call every family for influenza vaccination consent every year so if they accepted it once, she did not call them again. At that time, she indicated the floor nurse gave the influenza vaccine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who required restorative nursing services received services for 7 of 8 residents reviewed. (Resident B, Resident C, Resident E, Resident F, Resident G, Resident H, Resident J) Findings include: 1. On 4/18/23 at 8:21 A.M., Resident B was observed sitting in a chair, rocking with her eyes closed, and the TV turned on. On 4/18/23 at 12:44 P.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, age-related osteoporosis and congenital (present form birth) blindness. The most recent Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 1/17/23, indicated Resident B was moderately cognitively impaired and that AROM (active range of motion) restorative therapy was provided 4 of 7 days and walking restorative therapy was provided 2 of 7 days within the seven day look back period. Resident B required extensive assist of 1 staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Care plans included,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents environment remained free from accident hazards for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for falls. New interventions were not implemented following falls. (Resident H, Resident 5) Findings include: 1. On 4/19/23 at 11:40 A.M., Resident H was observed wondering the unit in a wheel chair. On 4/18/23 at 2:41 P.M., Resident H's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia and displaced midcervical fracture of left femur. The Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 3/23/23, indicated Resident H had severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for transferring and dressing. Resident H was a high risk for falls. Resident H's physician orders included, but were not limited to, alarming floor mat, check placement, and functioning every shift, antirollback to wheelchair two times a day for fall reduction measure, and place resident's bed against the wall per family request. Resident H's care plan dated 6/22/22 included, but not limited to:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services of a RN (Registered Nurse) were available at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 2 of 7 days reviewed for nurse staffing. Findings include: On 4/19/23 at 10:30 A.M., the daily nursing assignment sheets were provided for the week of 4/3/23 through 4/10/23 and reviewed. The sheets indicated there was no RN coverage for Saturday, 4/8/23 and Sunday, 4/9/23. During an interview on 4/21/23 at 4:45 P.M., the Administrator indicated there was not RN coverage for those dates and there should have been 8 hours of consecutive RN coverage every day. On 4/21/23 at 4:45 P.M., a current undated Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff policy, was provided by the Administrator and indicated . the facility must use the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week . 3.1-17(b)(3)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for hospice. A resident's as needed anti-anxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. (Resident 46) Finding includes: On 4/18/23 at 12:51 P.M., Resident 46's clinical record was reviewed. The diagnosis included, but was not limited to, anxiety. The Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set) Assessment, dated 3/21/23, indicated Resident 46's cognition was severely impaired and was currently on hospice. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: Lorazepam Intensol Oral Concentrate (anti-anxiety medication) 2 MG (milligram)/ML (milliliter). Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety; restlessness related to anxiety disorder, dated 3/13/23. Resident 46's clinical record lacked any physician reassessment for lorazepam after the initial 14 days after it was ordered. The clinical record lacked a care plan addressing the anti-anxiety medication. During an interview on 4/20/23 at 1:23 P.M., the DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure deteriorated medications carts were disposed of for 2 of 4 medication carts. Loose pills were found in the bottom of the medication cart drawers. (North Hall, South Hall) Findings include: 1. On 4/19/23 at 7:58 A.M., the medication cart on the North Hall was observed to have the following medications laying loose in the bottom of 2 drawers: 1 large white pill #12 1 small round pill with R # 25 1 small round blue pill with no writing 1 small round pill with # 1484 1 oblong peach pill with # 722 1 small round peach pill with PH # 034 1 small round white pill with #10 1/2 yellow pill could not read number 1 large round white pill with PH #020 1 small round white pill with no writing 1 white capsule with SG #179 1 peach round small pill with #OH 034 1 scored small white pill with # AC 152 1/2 small white pill with #49 1 small round clear orange 1 small oblong white pill with no number 1 large oblong pill with K #46 1 large round white pill with no number 1 small red round pill with PH # 32 1 small round red…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-07-26 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post accurate actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift daily for 5 of 6 days during the annual survey period. Finding includes: During an observation on 7/21/24 at 9:30 A.M. a posted nurse staffing data sheet, dated 7/18/24, was observed on the wall outside the 1st floor nurses station. During an observation on 7/22/24 at 2:48 P.M. a posted nurse staffing data sheet, dated 7/22/24, was observed on the wall outside the 1st floor nurses station. The sheet included, but was not limited to, the following information: Census, total number of staff for each shift and total hours of each shift for CNA (Certified Nurse Aide), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), and RN (Registered Nurse). The sheet indicated that .5 RNs worked the evening shift but did not specify which half of the shift the RN worked. The sheet indicated that 2.5 LPNs worked the evening shift but did not specify which half of the shift the LPN worked. On 7/25/24 at 11:35 A.M., the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-04-21 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the posted nurse staffing sheets included the facility census and actual hours worked for 5 of 5 days during the survey. Findings include: On 4/17/23 at 10:30 A.M., a staffing sheet was observed posted in the front entrance of the facility on the wall to the left of the nurse's station. The posted nurse staffing sheet indicated the facility name, current date, and the number of staff scheduled for the following disciplines: RN (Registered Nurse), LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), and CNA (Certified Nurse Aide). The facility's current daily resident census and actual hours worked were not included on the posting. On 4/18/23 at 8:58 A.M., the posted nurse staffing was observed. The number of staff on the evening shift included, but was not limited to, 1.5 LPN, 6.5 CNA, and night shift included, but was not limited to, 5.5 CNA and 7.5 total FTE. It lacked the facility's current daily resident census and actual hours worked. On 4/19/23 at 12:06 P.M., the posted nurse staffing was observed. The for indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HENRY COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 11/01/2013
DYNES, SHELDONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
PIDGEON, JOHNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
SHORE, MARIONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
WARE, DEBORAHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 08/27/2021
BETHEL SANITARIUM INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2013
BECK, RENEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/24/2016
BLYTHE, PAULAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2013
BOWMAN, JOSHUAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2013
CROSS, WALTERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2013
HARTMAN, KENTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/24/2016
LANDESS, JESSEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/23/2017
OETH, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2013
RING, BRIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/01/2022
VOLKMAN, SARAHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
−$199K
Related-party expense-3% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 7%Other / private 39%

This home reported −$199K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$310per resident / day
operating cost
$9,430per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$308per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155607. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next