Evansville Protestant Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 109 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 57 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 49 beds and averages 34.0 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.96 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.02 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.51 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.17 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise care plans and follow interventions to reduce the risk of falls for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for falls with major injury. This deficient practice resulted in two falls with fractures requiring hospitalization and a significant decline in the resident's Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). (Resident 7) Finding includes: On 3/26/25 at 10:11 A.M., Resident 7's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of right femur, fracture of upper end of right humerus, fracture of superior rim of right pubis, and vascular dementia. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 11/23/24, indicated Resident 7 had severe cognitive impairment, required setup assistance of staff (staff sets up/cleans up; resident completes the activity) with eating, required supervision of staff (staff provides verbal cues or touching/steadying assistance as resident completes the activity) for toileting and sit to stand transfers, was independent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-01 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager met required qualifications for 1 of 1 dietary manager qualifications reviewed. Finding includes: During an interview on 3/25/25 at 9:01 A.M., the Dietary Manager indicated she did not have a dietary manager certification and had not enrolled in the program. During an interview on 3/26/25 at 11:27 A.M., the Dietitian indicated she was aware the Dietary Manager was not certified but had not increased her visits; she was currently in the facility once a week. On 3/28/25 at 1:16 P.M., the Dietary Manager's employee file was reviewed. The Dietary Manager job description, signed on 3/11/25, indicated qualifications to accepting the role of dietary manager required completion of state-approved food service management course, or presently enrolled in a program. During an interview on 4/1/25 at 10:59 A.M., the Administrator indicated the facility did not have a written policy related to qualifications of the dietary manager, and the policy was to follow state regulations. 3.1-20(e)

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store and label food under professional standards related to food items not labeled or stored properly for 1 of 1 dietary areas observed. Findings include: During a kitchen walk through on 3/25/25 at 8:44 A.M., the following was observed: Walk in refrigerator: Bag of mixed broccoli, carrots, and celery open to air, no date Chunk of ham, dated 2/15 Carton of molded strawberries A container of bran mixture labeled prepped 3/8 A container of banana cake labeled prepped 3/16 Dry storage room: Rice crispy treats directly on the floor Box of sandwich crackers directly on the floor Walk in freezer: Bag of pepperonis doubled bagged; inside bag dated 12/21/23 and outside bag dated 6/29/24 On 4/1/25 at 10:44 A.M., the Administrator provided a policy titled Food Storage, dated 2017, that indicated Food will be stored a minimum of six inches above the floor . leftover food will be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely. Each item will be labeled and dated before being refrigerated. Leftover…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when lab results were not obtained for a resident with a catheter associated urinary tract infection for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for indwelling catheters and when medication suggestions were made by the pharmacist for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pharmacy reviews with recommendations. (Resident 27 and Resident D) Findings include: 1. On 3/26/25 at 10:22 A.M. Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of bladder. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/27/24, indicated Resident 27 was moderately cognitively impaired, required partial to moderate assistance (staff does less than half of the effort) for toileting, and had an indwelling catheter. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: May re-anchor catheter if becomes dislodged or occluded as needed, Contact Medical Doctor (MD),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans related to high risk medications were developed for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for medication use. (Resident 3, Resident D, Resident 14) Findings include: 1. On 3/25/25 at 2:26 P.M., Resident 3's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Fournier Gangrene, malignant neoplasm of prostate, and chronic pain syndrome. The most current Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/13/25, indicated Resident 3 was cognitively intact, was dependent on transferring, toileting, bathing, and dressing, and received an antibiotic and an opioid during the 7-day look back period. Resident 3 had a pain assessment during this time. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: daptomycin (an antibiotic) 600 milligrams (mg) daily Intravenous (IV) for 28 days per ID (infectious disease), infuse over 60 minutes dated, 3/16/25 to 4/13/25. oxycodone (pain medication) 5 mg administer 1 tablet orally every 4 hours as needed for pain, dated 1/16/25. The current care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's plan of care was implemented for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 29) Finding includes: On 3/26/25 at 10:07 A.M., Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 29 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease. The most recent Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/6/25, indicated Resident 29 was cognitively intact, required setup assistance (staff setup meals before dining) for eating, and had an unplanned weight loss of 5% or more in the last month. The current care plan included, but was not limited to: Recent significant weight loss in part related to increase in diuretic but also due to inadequate calorie intakes; Start date 2/17/25 Ice cream daily for added calories due to weight loss; Start date 3/6/25 During an observation on 3/26/25 at 11:45 A.M., Resident 29 was observed in the dining room and did not receive an ice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated for a urinary tract infection in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for indwelling catheter care. (Resident 27) Finding includes: On 3/26/25 at 10:22 A.M. Resident 27's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of bladder. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/27/24, indicated Resident 27 was moderately cognitively impaired, required partial to moderate assistance of staff (staff does less than half of the effort) for toileting, and had an indwelling catheter. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: May re-anchor catheter if becomes dislodged or occluded as needed, Contact MD (medical doctor); Start date 3/27/24 Foley catheter: Anchor 16 french, 30cc (cubic centimeters) balloon, provide catheter care every shift, supra pubic catheter(a thin tube inserted into the bladder through a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed by a physician since admission for 1 of 2 residents admitted in the last 90 days reviewed for accidents. (Resident 22) Finding includes: On 3/26/25 at 1:55 P.M., Resident 22's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 22 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia. The most recent admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/26/25, indicated Resident 22 was severely cognitively impaired and required partial assistance (staff does less than half of the effort) for toileting and bathing. The clinical record, including assessments, progress notes, and documents, lacked assessment of Resident 22 by a physician in the facility since admission. During an interview on 3/28/25 at 8:22 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated she could not find a physician assessment for Resident 22. On 4/1/25 at 10:47 A.M., the Administrator provided an undated policy titled Physician Services that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were acted upon for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident D) Finding includes: On 3/26/25 at 9:20 A.M., Resident D's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety disorder. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 1/12/25, indicated Resident D was cognitively intact, required setup assistance for eating, was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, and transferring, and received an antianxiety medication during the 7-day look back period. A current care plan, revised 2/21/25, indicated Resident D received antianxiety medication related to an anxiety diagnosis. A care conference was most recently completed on 1/10/25. Care plan conference notes indicated that all current care plans were reviewed. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: buspirone tablet (an antianxiety medication) - 10 milligrams (mg) at bedtime, dated 9/27/24 Discontinued physician orders included, but were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for as needed anti-anxiety medication use. Residents' as needed anti-anxiety medication was ordered for greater than 14 days. (Resident 29 and Resident 27) Findings include: 1. On 3/26/25 at 10:07 A.M., Resident 29's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 29 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease. The most recent Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/6/25, indicated Resident 29 was cognitively intact, and was dependent (staff does all of the work) for transfers. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: alprazolam (anti-anxiety medication) 0.25 milligrams (mg), one tablet by mouth three times daily as needed for pain; Start date 2/27/25 (no end date) The clinical record lacked a physician reassessment of the medication, or indication of contraindication for discontinuation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a catheter change was accurately documented for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for catheter associated urinary tract infections. (Resident 2) Finding includes: On 3/26/25 at 9:08 A.M., Resident 2's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, urine retention. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/26/25, indicated Resident 2 was cognitively intact, required maximal assistance (staff does more than half of the work) for toileting, bathing, and chair to bed transfers, and had an indwelling catheter. Physician orders included, but were not limited to: Change Foley catheter monthly: 18 French with 30 mL (milliliter) balloon on the 27th of the month; 2/1/25-3/2/25. Change Foley catheter monthly: 18 French with 30 mL (milliliter) balloon on the 2nd of the month; Start date 3/2/25. On 3/28/25 at 1:15 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) provided a document titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 50 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN