Heritage Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 327 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 190 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 126.8 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.43 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.76 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.20 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.48 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-07-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents admitted without pressure ulcers were provided effective interventions to prevent the development of an unstageable pressure ulcer on the spine for 1 of 5 residents who met the criteria for review of pressure ulcers. (Resident B) Finding includes: During an observation on 6/27/22 at 10:25 A.M., Resident B was observed laying in bed on Resident's back with blankets covering Resident B's shoulders. During an observation on 6/28/22 at 8:24 A.M., Resident B was observed laying in bed on Resident's back with blankets covering Resident B's shoulders. During an observation on 6/30/22 at 11:34 A.M., Resident B's dressing was changed. Resident B had a small white area on Resident B's spine on the lower portion of the back. On 6/28/22 at 8:58 A.M., Resident B's clinical record was reviewed. Current diagnosis included, but were not limited to, muscle weakness, anemia, heart failure, hypertension, pneumonia, hyponatremia, and respiratory failure. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2022-07-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent falls for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for falls, both residents received fractured femurs from their falls. Resident 41 had five additional falls after the fracture one resulting in a major injury. (Resident 41, Resident 76) Findings include: 1. On 7/1/22 at 10:51 A.M., Resident 41's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, nontraumatic brain dysfunction and dementia. The most recent admission MDS (minimum data set) Assessment, dated 4/7/22, indicated Resident 41 had a severe cognitive impairment, and required assistance of 1 (one) staff for all ADLs (activities of daily living). The MDS indicated Resident 41 had not fallen in the previous 6 months prior to admission, and had fallen 1 (one) time since admission to the facility. A current falls care plan, initiated 3/29/22, indicated at risk for falls related to muscle weakness, impaired balance, impaired cognition, forgetfulness to use walker,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided by the facility met professional standards of quality for 2 of 3 closed records reviewed, and 1 of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Blood pressure medication and an inhaler were not administered as indicated in the physician's orders, and a urinary catheter was not placed as ordered. (Resident L, Resident F, Resident M) Findings include: 1. On 6/5/26 at 2:33 P.M., Resident M's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, obstructive and reflux uropathy and hydronephrosis. The current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/11/26, indicated Resident M was cognitively intact and had an indwelling catheter. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to:May change foley catheter every 21 day and as needed (prn) due to occlusion one time a day every 21 day(s) for obstructive uropathy foley maintenance, dated 3/26/26. Foley catheter size 16 fr (french)/10cc (cubic centimeters) due to diagnosis of urinary retention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices and standards were followed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for wounds. (Resident N and Resident R). Foley catheter tubing was observed on the ground and gloves were not changed between touching soiled surfaces and clean surfaces. Findings include: 1. On 6/4/26 at 11:59 A.M., Resident N was observed sitting in his wheelchair outside in the courtyard. A Foley catheter bag and tubing were hanging under the wheelchair. The tubing was observed touching the ground. At 12:14 P.M., Resident N wheeled himself inside. The catheter tubing dragged the ground into the building and continued to touch the floor once inside the facility. On 6/5/26 at 2:08 P.M., Resident N's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, postpolio syndrome, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and paraplegia. The most current Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 3/19/26, indicated Resident N was cognitively intact,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan conferences were completed quarterly for 13 of 25 residents admitted reviewed for care plans. (Resident 1, Resident 16, Resident 14, Resident 22, Resident 17, Resident 26, Resident 42, Resident 45, Resident 49, Resident 75, Resident 99, Resident 105, Resident 115) Findings include: 1. On 4/22/25 at 9:03 A.M., Resident 26 indicated that the facility did not involve her in reviewing her care plan and that she did not attend care plan conference meetings quarterly. On 4/23/25 at 9:27 A.M., Resident 26's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, generalized anxiety disorder. The most current Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 2/20/25, indicated Resident 26 was cognitively intact, was dependent on staff (staff does all the effort) for transfers, and received an antianxiety medication and opioid during the 7-day lookback period. The most recent care plan conference was dated 10/29/24. On 4/24/25 at 2:30 P.M., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of all medications for 2 of 5 medication carts and 3 of 3 medication rooms observed. Medication refrigerator temperature logs were not filled out, loose pills were observed in medication carts, and medication carts were observed unlocked. (Horizons Unit, Harbor Unit, Wellsprings Unit) Findings include: 1. On 4/21/25 at 8:56 A.M., the Horizons Unit medication storage room was observed. A temperature log dated February 2025 and included a small fridge, small locked fridge, and large fridge, had temperatures listed for 2/1/25, and 2/16/25 through 2/18/25. All other dates were blank. The same form, dated April 2025, had temperatures listed for 4/16/25 through 4/18/25. All other dates were blank. A separate form dated February 2025 included the medication room temperature and a different refrigerator temperature. The form listed temperatures for 2/1/25. All other dates were blank. The same form, dated April 2025, had temperatures listed from 4/16/25 through 4/18/25. All other dates…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for all residents. Hand washing was not adequately performed during medication administration, cups were handled by the rims during a meal observation, clean linen was not handled appropriately, and activity items were not washed after use. (Wellsprings Unit, Registered Nurse (RN) 42, Resident 89) Findings include: 1. During a medication pass on 4/24/25 at 7:52 A.M., RN 42 was observed to enter Resident 236's room with a medication cup of pills. RN 42 placed the medication cup on the bedside table, assisted the resident to put on her pants and shoes, then washed her hands for 11 seconds. RN 42 then obtained the resident's blood pressure, administered the medications in the cup, and assisted to insert the resident's hearing aides. 2. During a lunch observation on 4/21/25 from 11:47 A.M. through 12:15 P.M. on the Wellsprings Unit, the following was observed: Resident 89 was utilizing a cloth…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity was respected for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity. A resident was told to urinate in her brief instead of being assisted to the toilet for staff convenience. (Resident 14) Finding includes: On 4/21/25 at 10:02 A.M., Resident 14 appeared to be teary. She indicated that she was upset about staff treatment of her the night of 4/20/25. She indicated that she was in bed and needed to use the toilet. An agency aide told her that she did not want to help her to the toilet and to urinate in her brief instead because she preferred to change the resident in bed. The resident indicated that she finally did urinate in her brief and the aide changed her. On 4/23/25 at 8:59 A.M., Resident 14's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease. The most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/24/25, indicated that Resident 14 was cognitively intact, required partial to moderate assistance of staff (staff does less than half of the effort)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed within 14 days of admission for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for new admissions. (Resident 335) Finding includes: On 4/22/25 at 1:30 P.M., Resident 335's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, end stage renal disease. Resident 335 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 4/21/25, indicated it was still in process and not completed. The MDS dashboard included a warning that the admission MDS was overdue. On 4/24/25 at 2:30 P.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated that the facility's policy was to follow the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. The most current RAI Manual, dated October 2024, indicated that an admission MDS Assessment completion date was no later than the 14th calendar day of the resident's admission (admission date + 13 calendar days). 3.1-31(d)(1)

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed no less than once every 3 months for 1 of 13 resident quarterly MDS assessments reviewed. (Resident 75) Finding includes: On 4/22/25 at 11:06 A.M., Resident 75's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnosis included, but was not limited to, stage 3 chronic kidney disease. The most recent completed MDS assessment was a significant change MDS assessment, dated 12/24/24. A quarterly MDS assessment, due 3/26/25, was still in progress (13 days late). 3.1-31(d)(3)

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was completed accurately for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 4) Finding includes: On 4/22/25 at 12:27 P.M., Resident 4's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, prediabetes and chronic pain syndrome. The most recent Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 2/19/25, indicated Resident 4 was cognitively intact, received hypoglycemic medication during the 7-day look back period, and did not receive an anticonvulsant during the 7-day lookback period. Current physician orders included, but were not limited to: gabapentin (an anticonvulsant medication) oral capsule 100 milligrams (mg) - Give one capsule by mouth two times a day for pain, dated 1/31/25 The clinical record lacked an order for a hypoglycemic medication. On 4/24/25 at 2:14 P.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated that she marked hypoglycemic in error and meant to mark anticonvulsant. On 4/24/25 at 2:30 P.M., the MDS Coordinator indicated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the development of a resident's comprehensive care plan for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Hospice and 1 of 1 residents reviewed for UTI. (Resident 45, Resident 22) Findings include 1. On 4/22/25 at 11:09 A.M., Resident 45's clinical record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, transient cerebral ischemic attack, occlusion and stenosis of left middle cerebral artery, and need assistance with personal care. The current Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident 45 was dependent on assistance for dressing, transferring and toileting. The current physician order included but was not limited to: Consult (name )Hospice for decline in health dated 3/6/25. There is no care plan for (name) Hospice for Resident 45. During an interview on 4/24/25 at 1:40 P.M., the Director of Nursing indicated there should be an initial care plan if a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN