Saint Anne Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 84 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 166 beds and averages 119.1 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 47 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.49 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · E2026-01-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to remove discontinued medication from 3 of 3 carts reviewed. (Apple Cart, Moon Cart, and 2nd half of 100 hall cart)Findings include: During an observation, on 1/16/26 at 9:51AM, with Qualified Medication Aid 3 (QMA) the Apple cart had the following discontinued medications; Resident 47 an open bottle of guaifenesin DM, Resident 79 an open bottle of guaifenesin DM, and Resident 91 open bottle of guaifenesin DM.During an observation, on 1/16/26 at 10:07AM, with Licensed Practical Nurse 4 (LPN) the Moon cart had the following discontinued medications; Resident 7 an open bottle of guaifenesin DM, and Resident 74 an open bottle of guaifenesin DM.During an observation, on 1/16/26 at 10:09AM, the second half of the 1st floor cart had the discontinued medication, Amitiza 24mcg, labeled for Resident 51. The medication was at the bottom of the cart.In an interview, on 1/16/26 at 10:15AM, LPN 4 indicated discontinued medications were put in the medication room to be disposed of on third shift.In an interview, on 1/16/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessment accuracy for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident 52)Findings include:Resident 52's record was reviewed on 1/13/2025 at 1:35 PM. The matrix indicated Resident 52 had a pressure ulcer- the highest stage was indicated as S.Resident 52's diagnoses included unspecified severe dementia with anxiety, generalized muscle weakness, and difficulty walking.A review of Resident 52's skin check completed on 10/28/2025 indicated Resident 52 had an improving unstageable pressure ulcer.Resident 52's current quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 52 had an unhealed pressure ulcer and an unstageable deep tissue injury.In an interview, on 1/16/2025 at 2:14 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) indicated she was unsure what a stage S pressure ulcer was and indicated Resident 52 did not have a pressure ulcer. The ADON indicated all of Resident 52's pressure ulcers had resolved.On 1/16/2025 at 2:14 PM, the ADON provided a wound assessment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staffing followed competent skills during a mechanical lift transfer for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident B).Findings include:A facility reported incident, dated 9/8/25, indicated during Resident B's transfer, the staff member heard a pop noise. Resident B was assessed, and an x-ray indicated the resident had a left humerus fracture.Resident B's record was reviewed on 10/1/25 at 10:34 AM. Diagnoses included anemia, obesity, hyperglycemia and chronic kidney disease.An order, dated 4/16/25, indicated Resident B should be transferred via Sara lift with 2 staff assistance.An interdisciplinary disciplinary team (IDT) noted, dated 9/16/25, indicated during Resident B's transfer on 9/8/25, Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 2 heard a pop noise. The note indicated QMA 2 transferred Resident B via a Sara lift (sit to stand mechanical lift) onto her bed. The note indicated after the transfer, QMA 2 repositioned Resident B into a lying position on her bed by placing her arm behind Resident B's right shoulder and her other arm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure water temperatures in facility storage tanks were monitored and legionella testing was performed routinely. 118 of 118 residents residing in the facility used water provided by the facility. Findings include: In an interview, on 2/27/25 at 1:04 PM, the Director of Nursing indicated she would provide policies and all records and logs pertaining to the facility's water management and legionella testing. A printed record of an email, dated 2/27/24 at 2:30 PM, indicated the Maintenance Director had contacted a company regarding a request for sample containers for legionella testing. The email indicated containers were being shipped that day or the following day for the facility to conduct legionella testing. A review of the facility assessment indicated the facility had a low probability of the occurrence of a resident with a legionella infection and a low capacity and performance to identify an issue. A review of 2024 temperature logs for water temperatures included spaces to record temperatures for hot water storage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to the ensure residents were free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident B). Findings include: During an interview on 8/14/24 at 11:46 AM, Resident B indicated she kept her credit card in her drawer in her room. Resident B indicated her power of attorney (POA) had noticed multiple charges to Doordash (food delivery company) on the resident's credit card statement. The POA notified the facility. Resident B indicated she was not aware of who in particular made the charges, but the facility talked to Doordash and Doordash told the facility the person who made the order used her personal name and home address. Resident B indicated the facility matched the name and address to an employee at the facility. Resident B indicated she never had the staff purchase items for her with her credit card nor did she give the staff permission to use her credit card. An investigation file was provided by the DON on 8/14/24 at 12:08 PM. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident D). Findings include: A continuous video recording was provided for review by the Administrator on 2/7/24 at 11:39 AM. The video was time stamped 12/27/23 at 4:46 AM. Resident D was observed sitting in a chair in the hallway and Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 4 was observed at the medication cart down the hall. Resident D was observed walking into room [ROOM NUMBER]. QMA 4 followed Resident D into the room. The video showed QMA 4's head bobbing up and down. Resident D was not visible at the time while in the room. QMA 4 was then observed pulling Resident D out of the room with her hands around both the resident's arms. The video showed Resident D resisted and tried to hit QMA 4. QMA 4 was then observed stepping back, Resident D lost his balance and fell to the floor in the hallway into an over the bedside table. Next, QMA 4 and Licensed Pratical Nurse (LPN) 5 were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported −$1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN