No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

University Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare

1400 Medical Park Dr, Fort Wayne, IN 46825 · Non profit - Corporation · 104 certified beds · (260) 484-1558 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$15,646 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,646 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
TherapyONE<0.1 mi
5050 N Clinton St · (260) 407-8663 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
5830 N Clinton St · (260) 483-2191 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
KL Market0.3 mi
4606 Parnell Ave · (260) 220-0899 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4031 N Clinton St · (260) 484-2543 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.4%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms28.7%25.2%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.4%0.0%0.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.2%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.6%23.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.6%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.2%3.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.6%23.3%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.3%13.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.7%79.0%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.281.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.601.441.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.6–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
55.4%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 80.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.13 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.23 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-19)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accident prevention interventions were implemented for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for accidents. A resident exited the facility unattended, his whereabouts unknown for approximately 13 hours. He was not noticed to be missing until an hour and half before being found approximately 1 mile away from the facility. (Resident B).Findings include:The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/19/26 when Resident B was last seen about 1:00 a.m. and reported missing at 2:00 p.m. the next day. He was located at 3:15 p.m., approximately 1 mile from the facility on sidewalk of busy 6 lane highway with a speed limit of 45 mph. He was brought back to the facility where he refused to re-enter the building and was escorted by local law enforcement to the hospital for evaluation. The facility Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on June 11, 2026, at 3:03 P.M. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent unsupervised smoking inside the facility and failed to ensure hazardous smoking materials were not accessible to residents who required supervised smoking for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident B). The Immediate Jeopardy began on 1/30/24 when Resident B was observed with cigarettes and lighter smoking in her room. Unsupervised smoking could result in fire or burn injury to herself and other residents residing in the facility. The Chief Operating Officer (COO), Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), Regional Director of Operations (RDO), and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on February 13, 2024 at 1:39 P.M. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on February 14, 2024. Findings include: On 2/12/24 at 12:13 P.M., Resident B's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included Schizoaffective disorder and depression. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 11/9/23, indicated the resident did not experience cognitive impairment.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of adequate hypochlorite (sanitizer) use in the facility dishwasher and sanitary food handling during food service. 82 of 82 residents residing in the facility were served food prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include:1) During a kitchen tour, on 02/15/2026 10:00 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) 2 was observed pulling a rack of wet dishes out of the dishwasher and reloading the dishwasher with dirty dishes. In an observation, on 02/15/2026 10:18 AM, DA 2 and DA 4 were in the dish room washing dishes, with 3 racks of wet dishes observed in the clean area. The Dietary Manager (DM) dipped a test strip into the filled dishwasher testing well during the sanitizing cycle. The test strip turned lavender in color, slightly darker than the 25 parts per million (PPM) indication on the test strip color guide, but not as dark as the 50 ppm color indicator. The DM ran two additional dishwasher cycles, inserting at test strip during the sanitizing cycle with the same color resulting. In a record review, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for medications and wound care for 3 of 19 residents reviewed. ( Resident 36, Resident 82, and Resident 15)2.A record review for Resident 82 began on 2/16/26 at 11:36 AM. Diagnoses included cellulitis, venous statis ulcers, chronic congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, and morbid obesity. A review of Resident 82's current admission MDS, dated [DATE], indicated their BIMS (Basic Interview for Mental Status) score was 15 (cognitively intact). The MDS indicated the resident had medically complex conditions, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, a history of sepsis, Parkinson's disease, cellulitis, and morbid obesity. A review of Resident 82's current Care Plan, titled Resident is at Risk for self-care deficits, indicated the resident had a problem of bilateral lower extremity cellulitis. Interventions included staff assistance for dressing, bathing, and transfers. A Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure safety measures were identified and put into place and hazardous chemicals were stored properly for 3 of 19 residents reviewed. (Resident 1, Resident 35, and Resident 56). Findings include: 1. A record review for Resident 1 began on 2/16/26 at 12:18 PM. Diagnoses included hypertension, seizure disorder, schizoaffective disorder, left side hemiplegia defined as paralysis of one side of the body, post-traumatic stress disorder, and chronic pain. A review of Resident 1's current quarterly MDS, 10/23/25, indicated their BIMS (Basic Interview for Mental Status) score was 13 (cognitively intact). The MDS indicated the resident had medically complex conditions, hypertension, hemiplegia, seizure disorder, anxiety, schizophrenia, post traumatic stress disorder, muscle wasting and atrophy, epilepsy. Resident 1 was taking an antipsychotic, antidepressant, diuretic, opioid, and an anticonvulsant. A review of Resident 1's current Care Plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered according to physician's orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident 5).Findings include:During an observation, on 02/18/2026 10:18 AM, a portable oxygen tank was observed at Resident 5's bedside. The tank was set to deliver 5 liters of oxygen per minute. Resident 5 was not in his room. On 02/18/2026 10:21 AM, Resident 5 was observed propelling his motorized w/c with no oxygen on. In an interview, on 02/18/2026 10:22 AM, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) 6 indicated she did not know why Resident 5 did not have his oxygen in place. Resident 5's record was reviewed on 02/18/2026 10:40 AM. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. A current admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)assessment, dated 11/17/25, indicated Resident 5 had a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9 (cognitively impaired). The MDS indicated Resident 5 used oxygen. A physician order, dated 11/8/2025, indicated Resident 5 should receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registered nurse was on duty for 8 consecutive hours every day. 65 residents resided at the facility. Findings include: On 4/11/25 at 10:14 AM, a review of the as worked nursing schedule, dated 4/3/25 through 4/10/25, indicated the following: On 4/4/25, Registered Nurse (RN) 4 clocked in at 8:44 AM and clocked out at 2:10 PM. On 4/5/25, RN 4 clocked in at 9:49 AM and clocked out at 2:05 PM. On 4/7/25, RN 4 clocked in at 11:20 AM and clocked out at 2:41 PM. In an interview, on 4/11/25 at 10:51, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated RN 4 was the only RN scheduled on 4/4/25 and 4/7/25. The DON indicated they had split the shift with RN 4 on 4/5/25. The DON indicated the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) covered the rest of the required 8 hours on 4/4/25 and 4/7/25. The DON indicated the time clock entries were accurate for RN 4. In an interview, on 4/11/15 at 11:00 AM, the ADON indicated they had been in the facility on 4/4/25 and 4/7/25. There were no time clock entries or other documentation to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure open items in the kitchen and unit refrigerators were labeled, dated, discarded when appropriate, and hair was covered for all employees present in the kitchen. 65 of 65 residents residing in the facility were served food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: During an observation, on 4/7/25 at 9:16 AM, a container of a brown lumpy substance covered with clear plastic wrap and a plastic bag of parsley with its original seal opened, twist ied shut were observed on a shelf in the walk-in cooler. Neither item was labeled or dated. A container of strawberries soaking in red liquid on a shelf in the cooler was dated 3/28. A bag of corn observed in the walk-in freezer was tied closed and did not have an open date. A large, uncovered cart holding trays with food items was observed adjacent to the tray line where two dietary staff members were assembling and serving food items to residents. A tray containing bowls of uncovered lettuce salads and a tray of cups of fruit cocktail was observed on the cart. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a process was in place to correct deficiencies and keep them from re-occurring. 65 residents resided in the building. Findings include: An annual survey completed on 6/7/2024 identified non-compliance of labeling and dating food items in the kitchen. The facility indicated the deficient practice would be corrected by 7/5/24. An annual survey completed on 6/7/2024 identified non-compliance of maintaining facility waste in the dumpster. The facility indicated the deficient practice would be corrected by 7/5/24. See F812 for additional information about current kitchen findings. See F814 for additional information about current maintenance of facility waste findings. A review of the current Quality Assurance and Improvement Program (QAPI) did not include performance improvement plans pertaining to labeling and dating items in the kitchen or maintenance of the facility dumpster. During an interview, on 4/11/25 at 2:30 PM, the Administrator indicated he had reviewed the kitchen and waste container concerns cited last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment was maintained on 3 of 3 units observed. 65 residents resided in the facility. Findings include: During a facility tour, on 4/11/25 from 9:50 AM until 10:07 AM, an air vent above the 200 hall nurses' station was observed to be covered with grey clumps too numerous to count. Near the 300-hall entrance, an air vent was observed to be covered with grey clumps. An air vent near room [ROOM NUMBER], was observed to have grey clumps around the edges. During an observation, on 4/11/25 at 11:14 AM, pencil eraser sized grey clumps too many to count were observed on the vented cover of the return air duct above the hallway near the east nurses' station. The Maintenance Director opened the cover causing clumps to fall to the counter of the nurses' station and nearby floor. The Maintenance Director pulled out the filter covering the circle shaped return air duct and revealed a covering of dust on the outside of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate weights were obtained for 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Resident 48 and Resident 5). Findings include: 1. Resident 48's record was reviewed on 4/7/25 at 1:21 PM. Diagnoses included adult failure to thrive, major depressive disorder, recurrent, and type 2 diabetes without complications. A review of Resident 48's current quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated their Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 13 (cognitively intact, etc.). The MDS indicated Resident 48 had a significant weight loss. A review of Resident 48's current care plan titled .altered nutritional status . indicated the resident had a problem of being severely underweight with a goal date of 5/20/25. Interventions included obtaining weights as indicated and reporting significant changes to the dietician, physician and family. A review of current physician orders did not contain orders specific to obtaining weight. A review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavioral interventions were resident specific for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 37). Findings include: On 4/8/25 at 9:22 AM, Resident 37 was observed sitting in the activity room. Resident 37 was yelling loudly to be assisted to the restroom. An unknown male resident indicated Resident 37 yells all day. Resident 37's record was reviewed on 4/10/25 at 10:28 AM. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, emphysema, cognitive communication deficit and tobacco use. Resident 37's admission Minimum Data Set, (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 8 (moderate cognitive impairment). A physician order, dated 2/13/25, indicated Resident 37 could be treated by counseling services. A physician order, dated 2/14/25, indicated Resident 37 could receive mental health services as needed. A Baseline Care Plan, dated 2/17/25, indicated Resident 37 had a history of substance abuse. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications are stored and labeled properly in 2 of 4 storage areas. Findings include: During a continuous observation, on [DATE] at 1:57 PM - 2:10 PM, the following was observed: In the 200 hall medication room, 6 of 7 boxes of Pulmicort were found to be expired on 12/2024. In an interview, on [DATE] at 1:59 PM, Licensed Practice Nurse (LPN) 10 indicated third shift was supposed check for outdates and the expired medication removed from the current storage area. In the 200 hall medication cart, 2 open vials of insulin did not have an opened date. The insulin was delivered by the pharmacy on 1-2-25. A bottle of liquid Konvomep was expired on [DATE]. The bottle was labeled to refrigerate, but was not refrigerated. In an interview, on [DATE] at 2:05 PM, LPN 10 indicated insulin should be labeled, and the expired medication should be removed from the cart. In an interview, on [DATE] at 01:57 PM, the Director of Nursing indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure notification of significant abnormal results for 1 of 2 reviewed. (Resident 12) Findings include: A review of Resident 12's record on 04/10/25 at 2:53 PM, indicated diagnoses of diabetes type 2, obesity, depression, and hypertension. During a record review, on 4/10/2024 at 2:53 PM, a blood glucose, dated 4/4/25 at 7:31 PM, measured 527 mg/dL. The progress notes did not indicate a physician was notified of a glucose measurement of > 500 mg/dL. During a record review, on 4/10/2024 at 2:53 PM, a blood glucose, dated 4/10/2025 12:01 AM, measured 560 mg/dL. The progress notes did not indicate a physician was notified of >500 blood glucose. In an interview, on 04/10/25 at 3:01 PM, LPN 11 indicated notifying a physician when a glucose measurement was over 500mg/dL was the facility policy. A current policy, dated 9/11/2023, provided by the Director of Nursing, on 4/9/25 at 1:32 PM, indicated the physician should be notified for a glucose > 500 mg/dL. 3.1-49 (2)

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure snacks were available at night for 3 of 24 residents reviewed (Resident B, Resident C and Resident D) Findings include: During an observation, on 4/8/25 at 10:18 AM, the west hall refrigerator contained a few packages of snacks with names of residents written on the packages. No general snacks available to all residents on the unit were observed. No dry storage of snacks was observed on the unit. In an interview, on 4/18/25 at 10:19 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 7 indicated general snacks for all residents were not stored on the unit. She indicated snacks were delivered by the kitchen staff and given to residents when the snacks were received. During an interview, on 4/9/25 at 1:55 PM, Resident B indicated snacks were usually gone in the evening and there was nothing available during the night when a person was hungry. They indicated when snacks were available, they were not always diabetic friendly or easy for people without teeth to consume. During an interview, on 4/9/25 at 1:56 PM, Resident C indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were contained inside the dumpster for 2 of 3 observations. Findings include: During an observation, on 4/7/25 at 9:05 AM, a dumpster lid was observed flipped up leaving the dumpster wide open and fully accessible. A large plastic bag was observed partially hanging out of the dumpster door. Multiple tears were observed in the trash bag with a fast-food cup, lid and straw partially hanging out of the bag. Cups, straws, snack and candy packages, gloves, and plastic bags were observed strewn throughout the lawn near the dumpster. Additional cups, candy and snack wrappers, cigarette packs and straw papers were observed in the parking lot, sidewalks, and grassy enclosures in the parking lot area. During an interview, on 4/7/25 at 9:32 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) indicated all dumpster doors should be closed to prevent rodent access. The DM indicated trash should not be present in the lawn area. During an observation, on 4/7/25 at 1:22 PM, the side door of the dumpster was observed to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain procedures to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections during 3 of 3 observations. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 04/09/25 at 09:53 AM, Licensed practical nurse (LPN) 2 placed her laptop on the mattress of Resident 23. The resident's covered foot contacted the laptop during a blood glucose measurement. LPN 2 placed the laptop and the glucometer on top of the medication cart without disinfecting the devices. LPN 2 placed the glucometer into the drawer of the medication cart. In an interview, on 04/09/25 at 10:05 AM, LPN 2 indicated Resident 23 was the only resident that used the glucometer. 2. During an observation, on 04/09/25 at 10:42 AM, LPN 2 had gloves on, gave an intramuscular injection, removed the gloves, but did not perform hand hygiene before touching the medication cart. In an interview, on 04/09/25 at 10:59 AM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), indicated staff should perform hand hygiene before and after giving medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change in condition following a fall for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident R) Findings include: On 12/16/24 at 10:56 A.M., Resident R's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included, non-alcohol related cirrhosis of the liver with liver cancer, dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and protein-calorie malnutrition. He was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation services following hospitalization for a fall with fractured neck vertebrae. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/1/24, indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment; no signs of delirium; and no behaviors. He required set-up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene. He was independent with bed mobility and required moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, showering and dressing. He was able to walk with his walker and supervision to touch assistance. He was receiving therapy services with speech, physical, and occupational therapies. A care plan, revised on 11/13/24, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was coded accurately for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for assessments (Resident F). Findings include: On 11/25/24 at 11:03 A.M., Resident F's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and lymph edema. The resident had been hospitalized 9/16-9/27/24 due to altered mental status, abnormal labs, and hypotension. An admission Observation form, dated 9/27/24 at 2:30 p.m., indicated the resident had been re-admitted to the facility following hospitalization for encephalopathy (altered brain function). Her skin assessment indicated she had a pressure area to her left heel measuring 6 centimeters (cm) by 6 cm and a pressure wound to her right ankle. The right ankle wound measured 0.5 cm by 0.5 cm. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/3/24, indicated in Section M-Skin Condition, a formal and clinical assessment was completed and the resident was at risk for pressure ulcers. The assessment indicated Resident F had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring and assessments were completed for a resident with a history of substance use disorder, and multiple falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident C). Findings include: A complaint, reported to the Indiana Department of Health on 11/4/24, indicated Resident C had been hospitalized following multiple falls at the facility and acute illness. While hospitalized , a urine drug test was completed and was positive for illegal drugs. The complainant indicated Resident C had a substance use disorder (SUD) but hadn't used any drugs or alcohol the past year. The complainant indicated they were unsure where the resident had gotten the illegal substances from. The complainant indicated the family hadn't been notified of the resident's deteriorating condition and multiple falls. The facility was aware of the resident's SUD prior to admission to the facility. On 11/22/24 at 11:45 A.M., Resident C's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included diabetes,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective behavior care plan, behavioral assessments, behavior monitoring and documentation was completed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for behavioral health (Resident K). Findings include: On 6/25/24 at 10:26 A.M., Resident K's record was reviewed. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, Schizophrenia, and diabetes. She had a history of urinary tract infections (UTI) and had been treated with antibiotics on 2/12/24 for a positive urinalysis and mild confusion and again, on 3/6/24 followed by hospitalization and treatment with intravenous (IV) antibiotics. A quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment, dated 4/27/24, indicated the resident had no cognitive impairment and no behaviors, delusions, or hallucinations. She had several mood indicators including little interest or pleasure in doing things; feeling down, depressed or hopeless; trouble falling asleep or sleeping too much; feeling tired or little energy; poor appetite or overeating; feeling bad about herself; and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner to promote food safety. 59 of 59 residents residing in the facility ate food prepared in the facility kitchen. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 6/2/24 at 9:41 AM red spots of dried liquid in a splattered pattern were observed on the wall containing the kitchen entry door. In the meal service area where bowls of cereal and condiments were stored, a partial piece of toast with jelly with missing portions in a bite pattern on a napkin. A Styrofoam cup filled with oatmeal and a spoon sat next to the toast. Dietary aide (DA) 2 indicated both items belonged to DA 3. The back door leading to the outside of the building was open, leading to a receiving area including the dumpsters. The closest dumpster had open lids and was located about 34 feet from the kitchen door. [NAME] 4 indicated the staff would leave the back door open to help keep the kitchen cool. She indicated she was not aware the door should be shut when not directly attended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a process was in place to identify and correct deficiencies from re-occurring. 59 residents resided in the facility Findings include: The facility annual survey completed on 6/16/23 identified noncompliance regarding labeling and dating of food products. The facility indicated the noncompliance would be corrected by 7/5/23. See F812 for additional information about current kitchen sanitation findings. A QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) committee list was provided by the Executive Director (ED) on 6/3/24 at 11:41 AM. The member list included Executive Director, DON, ADON, Admissions director, MDS coordinator, Medical Records in central supply, Therapy Director, Business Office manager, HR director, Director of Food services, Maintenance Director, Medical Director, Nurse practitioner. The 2nd quarter QAPI Plan, dated 5/24/24, was reviewed. The QAPI Plan indicated segments of care including Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) for environment, human resources, social services, operations,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean environment was maintained in 4 of 5 rooms reviewed. 4 residents resided in the 4 rooms affected (Resident 35, Resident 14, Resident 21, Resident 5, and Resident 32). Findings include: During an observation on 6/2/24 at 10:49 AM, Resident 35's floor (room [ROOM NUMBER]) had multiple dime to quarter sized yellow/orange spots on the right side of the bed. The resident had a foley catheter hanging in this location. The catheter was emptied by staff. On the left side of Resident 35's bed, near the top, 5 disposable chucks/chux pads (incontinence pad used under resident to protect mattresses by containing urine or feces) were observed wadded up and piled on the floor in the corner of the room by the left side near the head of the bed. A strong urine odor was in the room and radiated to the hall. A Mountain Dew and empty pop bottles were on the floor. During an observation on 6/2/24 at 10:32 AM, Resident 14's floor (room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services and assistance was provided to maintain correct posture for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: On 6/2/24 at 12:08 PM, Resident 4 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the hallway. Resident 4 was leaning to the far right bent over at the waist. On 6/2/24 at 12:10 PM a staff member was observed assisting Resident 4 into an upright position. On 6/2/24 at 1:38 PM, Resident 4 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the hallway. Resident 4 was bent over at the waist leaning to the far right. Resident 4's lower body was nearly off the chair. A staff member instructed Resident 4 to straighten up. Resident 4 attempted to raise their torso and was not successful. Resident 4 did not assume an upright position in the wheelchair. On 6/2/24 at 1:40 PM, a staff member was observed assisting Resident 4 to an upright sitting position in the wheelchair. The staff member placed Resident 4's right foot into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision for prevention of falls for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident 4). Findings include: On 6/2/24 at 12:08 PM, Resident 4 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the hallway. Resident 4 was leaning to the far right bent over at the waist. On 6/2/24 at 12:10 PM a staff member was observed assisting Resident 4 into an upright position. On 6/2/24 at 1:38 PM, Resident 4 was observed sitting in their wheelchair in the hallway. Resident 4 was bent over at the waist leaning to the far right. Resident 4's lower body was slightly off the chair. A staff member instructed Resident 4 to straighten up. Resident 4 attempted to raise their torso and was not successful. Resident 4 did not assume and was not assisted to an upright position in the wheelchair. On 6/2/24 at 1:45 PM, a staff member was observed assisting Resident 4 to an upright sitting position in the wheelchair. The staff member placed Resident 4's right foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents respiratory equipment was maintained to prevent contamination for 1 of 2 residents reviewed respiratory care (Resident 38). Findings include: During an observation on 6/2/24 at 11:28 AM, on the bedside stand next to Resident 38's bed, a respiratory face mask was observed lying on top of a nebulizer machine, undated, unbagged, with cloudiness observed on edges of clear plastic mask. A suction machine with an attached suction container full of cloudy light tan liquid was observed next to the nebulizer machine on the bedside stand. The suction container had a clear, plastic tube extending from it open to air. No dates were found on the suction container or tubing. Resident 38's record was reviewed on 6/2/24 at 1:05 PM. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of left middle cerebral artery, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure triggers were identified, communicated, and interventions in place to avoid or alleviate re-traumatization for 2 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 2 and Resident 22). Findings include: 1) On 6/2/24 at 11:22 AM, Resident 2 was observed to have a flat facial expression. In an interview on 6/2/24 at 11:23 AM, Resident 2 avoided eye contact. Resident 2 answered 2 survey questions and abruptly ended the interview. Resident 2's record was reviewed on 6/5/24 at 1:28 PM. Diagnoses included anxiety, major depressive disorder, current nicotine use and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Resident 2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was 15 (no cognitive impairment). The MDS indicated Resident 2 sometimes displayed social isolation. The MDS indicated Resident 2 had not displayed behaviors of verbal aggression, physical aggression, wandering or resistance of care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for 2 of 19 residents reviewed (Resident 21, and Resident 35). Findings include: 1) During an observation and interview on 6/2/24 at 11:42 AM, a cup containing two round white pills were observed on Resident 21's bedside table. Resident 21 indicated the pills were Tylenol and the nurse had left them for him to take when he was ready. He indicated he had never been told that medication needed to be secured if he was not ready to take it at the time it was offered. At the end of the interview, Resident 21 left the room with the pills remaining in the cup at his bedside. Residnet 21 had a roommate in the room. Resident 21's record was reviewed on 6/5/24 at 9:24 AM. Diagnoses included old myocardial infarction, lumbago with sciatica, and low back pain. Resident 21's current quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated his Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15 (cognitively intact).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were contained inside the dumpster for 1 of 2 observations. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 6/2/24 at 9:59 AM, the kitchen door leading to the outside loading dock was propped open. All kitchen staff had been at the opposite end of the kitchen performing meal service. The dumpster was located about 34 feet from the kitchen door. The dumpsters' lids were open with bags of trash inside. A bag of trash was observed on the ground in front of the dumpster torn open. Piles of food debris including partial pieces of pizza, open Chinese food containers with bits of food, fast food cups, straws, and bags, soda bottles and cans, used gloves, lip balm, plastic bags and other debris were lying on the ground around the dumpster, in the grassy area near the dumpster and scattered throughout the parking lot. Cigarette butts, too many to count, were observed on the pavement of the loading area in front of the dumpster area. [NAME] 4 indicated all departments should make sure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-26 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 5 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident B, Resident C, Resident D, Resident E, and Resident F). Findings include: A resident roster was provided by the Administrator on 3/26/24 at 12:45 PM. The roster indicated Resident B, Resident C, Resident E and Resident F were interviewable. In an interview on 3/26/24 at 11:30 AM, Resident B indicated even though a meal ticket, matching the menu was completed, the facility did not serve what was on the menu. Resident B indicated many times she did not receive what was on the meal ticket or menu. She indicated the facility had not informed the residents of the menu change. In an interview on 3/26/24 at 11:47 AM, Resident F indicated often she didn't receive meals per the menu or meal tickets. She indicated the facility had not informed the residents of a menu change. In an interview on 3/26/24 at 12:11 PM, Resident E indicated there had been a few times when the meal served did not match the menu posted. The resident indicated the facility had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure medication and treatment carts were secured/locked for 2 of 3 observations. Findings include: During an continuous observation on 12/5/23 at 1:10 PM - 1:13 PM, 2 medication carts on 200 hall were unlocked and 1 treatment cart on 300 hall was unlocked. There were no staff present at the medication or treatment carts. 3 staff and 2 residents were also observed walking past the carts. During an observation on 12/5/23 at 1:20 PM, the 100 hall treatment cart was unlocked. There were no staff present at the treatment cart. In an interview on 12/5/23 at 1:13 PM, Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 2 indicated all medication carts should be locked when not in use. In an interview on 12/5/23 at 1:20 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 3 indicated all medication and treatment carts should be locked when not in use. A resident roster was provided by the Administrator on 12/5/23 at 1:40 PM. The roster indicated 17 residents resided on the 100 hall, 28 residents resided on the 200 hall and 46 residents resided on the 300 hall. A policy,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident G). Findings include: Resident G's record was reviewed on 12/5/23 at 2 PM. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, edema and dementia. An active order, dated 5/27/2022, indicated weekly weights were to be completed every Friday. The weight log, reviewed 8/2/2023 - 12/2/2023, indicated Resident B was not weighed during the following weeks: 8/13/2023 - 8/19/2023 8/20/2023 - 8/26/2023 9/3/2023 - 9/9/2023 9/10/2023 - 9/16/2023 9/17/2023 - 9/22/2023 10/1/2023 - 10/7/2023 10/8/2023 - 10/14/2023 10/22/2023 - 10/28/2023 10/29/2023 - 11/4/2023 11/12/2023 - 11/18/2023 Resident G's nursing notes indicated there were no refusal and/or documentation of refusal of weights during the missed weekly weights above. During an interview on 12/5/23 at 1:13 PM, Qualified Medication Aide (QMA) 2 indicated orders were to be followed. QMA 2 indicated when the resident refused then the refusal was documented. A policy, dated 12/1/2023, titled Physician Services and Orders, was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure elopement prevention interventions were in place for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. Findings include: During an observation on 10/12/23 at 9:18 AM, the surveyor pulled on the facility entrance door causing an alarm to sound. Resident A came to the front door, entered a code, and pushed the door open. 2 employees voices were heard coming from offices near the front door, but no employee was present in the office area when the surveyor entered the building. Within a few minutes, the Business Office Manager (BOM) came to the receptionist area and greeted the surveyor. She did not inquire how the surveyor as able to enter the facility. Resident A's record was reviewed on 10/12/23 at 11:22 AM. Diagnoses included depression, unspecified, generalized anxiety disorder, and hypothyroidism. A review of Resident A's current admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated her Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,646 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,646 — penalty dated 2024-02-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 88%Medicare 4%Other / private 7%

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$415per resident / day
operating cost
$12,623per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$447per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155567. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next