Parkview Haven

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 37% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 36.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly labeled and stored for 1 of 1 medication carts observed. (North Hall Cart) Finding includes: On 6/24/25 at 2:33 p.m., the North Hall Medication Cart was observed with QMA 2. The following medications were not labeled or stored properly: a. There was a bottle of Vitamin C 500 milligram tablets, Tylenol 500 milligram tablets, and famotidine 20 milligram tablets with Resident 25's name and physician written in black marker. There were no administration instructions for the medications. b. There was a bottle of Tylenol 500 milligram tablets with Resident 25's name and physician written in black marker. There were no administration instructions. c. There was a bottle of aspirin 81 milligram tablets and vitamin D3 25 microgram tablets with Resident 14's name and physician written in black marker. There were no administration instructions. d. There were two bottles of multivitamin tablets with Resident 30's name and physician written in black marker. There were no administration instructions. e.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Baseline Care Plan was complete and accurate related to the use of half side rails for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 183) Finding includes: During an observation and interview on 6/18/25 at 11:15 a.m., Resident 183 was observed sitting up in bed, there were half side rails on each side of the bed. The resident indicated she had a couple of falls out of her bed since she arrived to the facility. On 6/20/25 at 4:45 p.m., Resident 183 was observed sitting up in bed. She indicated the facility got her a longer bed and it was comfortable for her. There were half side rails observed on each side of the bed. Resident 183's record was reviewed on 6/19/25 at 3:52 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, lymphedema of the left lower extremity, colon cancer, and dementia. The resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An Observation document, titled, Restraints/Adaptive Equipment - Side Rails…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were implemented for residents for risk of elopement, pain, and antibiotic therapy for 3 of 15 resident care plans reviewed. (Residents 5, 25, and 6) Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident 5 was complete on 6/19/25 at 4:00 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, paranoid schizophrenia, anxiety, and dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/2/25, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident was independent with bed mobility, transfers, and walking. An Elopement Evaluation, dated 4/7/25, indicated the resident was independent with ambulation. The resident was cognitively impaired and had poor decision-making skills. The resident had a history of wandering into unsafe areas and was a risk for elopement. The section in the assessment related to Elopement Care Plan was not checked as initiated with a comment, already has wanderguard. The June 2025 Physician's Order Summary (POS) indicated an order for a WanderGuard (wearable device…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to update care plans related to safety and fall interventions for 2 of 15 resident care plans reviewed. (Residents 21 and 8) Findings include: 1. On 6/20/25 at 12:13 p.m., Resident 21's room was observed. The call light cord was wrapped around the upper assist rail on the bed and a black zip tie was holding the cord to the assist rail. There was a silver hand bell on top of the resident's dresser. The resident was not in the room at the time. The record for Resident 21 was reviewed on 6/19/25 at 11:59 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia with mood disturbance, general anxiety disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions. The Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 4/29/25, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. She required supervision with bed mobility and ambulation. A Care Plan, updated 4/30/25, indicated the resident was at risk for decline in mood related to depression. She had a history of wanting to self-harm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary treatment and services related to not completing a treatment order as needed and the monitoring and assessment of skin discolorations for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin conditions. (Residents 24 and 4) Findings include: 1. On 6/18/25 at 3:52 p.m., Resident 24 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in the dining area. There were reddened raised areas to the right side of her chin and both sides of her nose. On 6/19/25 at 3:57 p.m., Resident 24 was observed sitting in a wheelchair by the nurses' station. The reddened raised areas were still observed to her chin and nose. On 6/20/25 at 3:12 p.m., Resident 24 was observed lying in bed. The reddened raised areas were still observed to her chin and nose. Record review for Resident 24 was completed on 6/20/25 at 12:21 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, schizophrenia, Alzheimer's, dementia, anxiety, and bipolar disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/27/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall precautions were in place for a resident with a history of falls for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. (Resident 1) Finding includes: On 6/18/25 at 3:54 p.m., Resident 1 was observed seated in her wheelchair in the dining room. There were no anti-lock brakes in place to her wheelchair. On 6/19/25 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 1 was observed seated in her wheelchair in the lounge area watching television. There were no anti-lock brakes in place to her wheelchair. On 6/20/25 at 11:48 a.m., Resident 1 was observed seated in her wheelchair in the dining room eating lunch. There were no anti-lock brakes in place to her wheelchair. The record for Resident 1 was reviewed on 6/20/25 at 2:58 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, vascular dementia, and delusional disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/4/25, indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. She had no falls since the prior assessment. She required substantial/maximal assist with bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor nutritional intake for meals for a resident with history of weight loss for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 6) Finding includes: Resident 6's record was reviewed on 6/19/25 at 11:50 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fractures of right ulna and left femur, cognitive communication deficit, and chronic pain. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 4/25/25, indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired for daily decision making. She required supervision for eating. She had a weight loss of 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in last 6 months and was not on physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. On 12/3/2024, the resident weighed 165 lbs. On 6/2/2025, the resident weighed 145 pounds, which was a 12.12% loss. A Food and Nutrition Care Plan, dated 12/12/24, indicated the resident was consuming 50-75% of meals with no difficulties. She had a weight loss of 19.6 pounds in 6 months. She had been changed to a mechanical soft diet until new dentures…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for self-administration of medications and had a physician's order to self-administer medications, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Residents 139 and 9) Findings include: 1. On 5/28/24 at 11:17 a.m., Resident 139 was observed seated in her recliner in her room. The nebulizer machine on her bedside table was on and she had the mask in place over her mouth and nose. The resident indicated her nebulizer treatment was in progress. There were no staff present in the room or near the room. The resident's record was reviewed on 5/30/24 at 2:35 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/17/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A Physician's Order, dated 5/16/24, indicated ipratropium-albuterol solution 0.5 mg (milligrams)-3 mg/3 ml (milliliters) two times a day. There was a lack of any physician's order for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an area of discoloration was assessed and monitored for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for skin conditions (non-pressure related). (Resident 1) Finding includes: On 5/28/24 at 11:26 a.m., Resident 1 was sitting in the recliner in her room. She had a discoloration noted to the outer portion of her right calf. At the time, Resident 1 indicated her lower leg sometimes bothered her, so she would put some cream on the affected area. On 5/30/24 at 11:37 a.m., Resident 1 was sitting in the recliner in her room. The outer portion of her right calf was discolored. The resident indicated she had put some cream on it, but it was still hurting. Resident 1's record was reviewed on 5/29/24 at 12:13 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, venous insufficiency and peripheral vascular disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/18/24, indicated the resident was moderately impaired for daily decision making. A Physician's Order, dated 2/15/24, indicated a weekly skin assessment was to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders for a pressure ulcer dressing were specific and dressings were in place per physician's orders for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident 1) Finding includes: On 5/28/24 at 11:36 a.m., Resident 1 was observed in her room. She had a nude colored dressing on her right buttocks. There was no date on the dressing. The resident, at that time, indicated she had a wound on her buttocks that caused her some pain. She thought the staff were putting cream on the area. During an observation of the wound on 5/31/24 at 1:29 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) wiped calmoseptine from Resident 1's buttocks. There was no dressing noted to either side of the buttocks. There were two discolored areas on the middle cleft on both cheeks. There were no open areas noted at the time. Resident 1's record was reviewed on 5/29/24 at 12:13 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, venous insufficiency, and peripheral vascular disease. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $389K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN